{"paper_id":"d108ffa0-7bc5-4873-95d3-abeaf7612737","body_text":"Ovarian cancer is the fifth leading cause of cancer-associated mortality among women in the United States and is the most lethal gynecological cancer in the developed world. Ovarian cancer is histologically and genetically diverse and can be broadly classified into three groups: epithelial, germ cell and stromal cell tumors. More than 90% of ovarian cancers are epithelial ovarian cancers (EOCs). EOCs can be broadly divided into Type I and Type II tumors ( 1 ). Type I tumors include clear cell, endometrioid, mucinous and low-grade serous carcinomas and are often associated with identifiable precursor lesions. Clear cell and endometrioid EOCs are typically associated with endometriosis. The most common high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) is Type II EOCs. In contrast to Type I EOCs, at the time of diagnosis, HGSOCs have typically spread to other tissues within the peritoneal cavity. Small-cell carcinoma of the ovary, hypercalcemic type (SCCOHT) is a highly malignant and aggressive tumor that typically occurs in women younger than forty years old. Although SCCOHT was speculated to be epithelial, sex cord, germ cells, and neuroendocrine, SCCOHT is now categorized as miscellaneous ovarian neoplasms.\nDespite the great recent progress in the genomic understanding of the diverse subtypes of ovarian cancer, therapeutic approaches for ovarian cancer patients have not evolved in parallel. The standard care remains surgical debulking followed by chemotherapy. Thus, a personalized approach based on the genetic make-up of different subtypes of ovarian cancer is urgently needed to improve patient outcomes. The development of such personalized therapeutic approaches relies on a combination of genetic profiling and a deep understanding of how certain genetic alterations contribute to malignant phenotypes of tumors and their-associated microenvironments. This review will focus on frequent genetic alterations in SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complexes in a set of genetically well-defined subtypes of ovarian cancer ( Figure 1  and  Table 1 ), offering both mechanistic insights and therapeutic implications.\n\nDNA exists in the form of nucleosomes by wrapping around histone proteins in cells. Thus, accessibility of nucleosomes is a key determinant of gene transcription and expression. Chromatin remodeling complexes are evolutionally conserved multi-subunit epigenetic regulators. They control gene accessibility by sliding, dissociating and replacing nucleosomes using energy derived from ATP hydrolysis. The ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling complexes include five different classes: SWI/SNF, ISWI, CHD, INO80 and SWR1. Relevant to this review, SWI/SNF genetic alterations occur in ~20% of all human cancers ( 2 ), which ranks the complex as the most frequently mutated epigenetic regulator in human cancers ( 3 ).\nSWI/SNF complexes were initially discovered by yeast genetic screening based on mating-type switch (SWI) and nutrient switch (SNF). Subsequent characterization revealed multi-subunit protein complexes that regulate gene transcription in an ATP-dependent manner from yeast to human. Human SWI/SNF complexes include BAF complex that contains either BAF250a (ARID1A) or BAF250b (ARID1B) subunits, and PBAF complex that contains BAF180 (PBRM1) and BAF200 (ARID2). Both BAF and PBAF complexes contain one of the two mutually exclusive catalytic ATPases, either BRG1 (encoded by  SMARCA4 ) or BRM (encoded by  SMARCA2 ). All SWI/SNF complexes contain core subunits such as BAF155 (encoded by  SMARCC1 ), BAF170 (encoded by  SMARCC2 ), and BAF47 (encoded by  SMARCB1 ). In addition to these core subunits, additional accessory subunits are associated with SWI/SNF complexes, which makes the SWI/SNF complexes highly variable in a cellular context-dependent manner.\nMammalian SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complexes are implicated in a number of important biological processes such as transcription, replication, repair, recombination and chromatin structure. However, the most extensively studied role of the complexes is gene expression regulation through altering transcription. It is well recognized that SWI/SNF complexes may function as either transcription activators or repressors in a context-dependent manner. SWI/SNF complexes can interact with both histones and DNA. For example, ARID subunits of SWI/SNF complexes bind to AT rich DNA sequences, while a number of the SWI/SNF subunits interact with histones through domains such as bromodomains (e.g., the catalytic subunits BRG1 and BRM). In addition, AP-1 transcription factors such as FOS/JUN have been shown to recruit the BAF chromatin remodeling complex to establish accessible chromatin ( 4 ). This allows external signaling to regulate gene transcription. In addition to promoters, SWI/SNF complexes are also recruited to enhancers and clusters of active enhancers (the so-called super-enhancers) ( 5 , 6 ). Interestingly, disease-causing mutations in the subunits of SWI/SNF complexes cause disassembly of most SWI/SNF complexes at promoters and typical enhancers, while having minimal effects on super-enhancer-associated complexes ( 5 ). This raises the possibility that the distribution pattern of SWI/SNF complexes with disease-causing inactivating mutations may promote tumorigenesis while maintaining cell identity. This may also explain why SWI/SNF mutations exhibit a high degree of tissue specificity.\n\nEndometriosis-associated ovarian clear cell carcinomas (OCCC) and ovarian endometrioid carcinomas (OEC) are the second and third most common histological subtypes that together account for ~25% of epithelial ovarian cancer cases. OCCC ranks second as the cause of death from epithelial ovarian cancer and is associated with a poorer prognosis compared to other ovarian cancer subtypes ( 7 ). OCCC typically has a low response rate to platinum-based standard care for ovarian cancer. Radiation therapy is potentially beneficial for a subset of OCCC. However, for advanced stage disease, there is currently no effective therapy. Notably, in Japan, its prevalence is higher than in western countries, with an estimated incidence of ~25% of epithelial ovarian cancer.\nBased on saturation of mutational analysis of the Cancer Genome Atlas datasets,  ARID1A  is the most frequently mutated epigenetic regulator across human cancers ( 3 ). OCCC and OEC are among the types of cancer with highest  ARID1A  mutation rate. The discovery of somatic  ARID1A  mutations in over 50% OCCC and 30% OEC represents a major advance in these histological subtypes ( 8 , 9 ). Over 90% of the  ARID1A  mutations observed in EOC are frame-shift or nonsense mutations that result in loss of ARID1A protein expression ( 8 – 10 ). Notably, loss of ARID1A correlates with late-stage disease and predicts early recurrence ( 11 ). Thus, there is an even greater need for targeted therapies that are selective for  ARID1A -mutated EOC.\nDespite  ARID1A  mutation correlation with loss of ARID1A protein expression, only ~30% of the OCCCs with  ARID1A  mutations have both alleles affected ( 9 ). This suggests that  ARID1A  mutation might be haploinsufficient. ARID1A and ARID1B are two mutually exclusive subunits of the BAF complex. Notably, ARID1B is upregulated when ARID1A is inactivated ( 12 , 13 ). Inactivation of ARID1B is synthetically lethal with  ARID1A  mutation ( 12 ). However, ARID1A and ARID1B simultaneous loss has been observed ( 14 ). This raises the possibility that residue BAF complexes containing either ARID1A or ARID1B may sustain the survival of these cancer cells. Alternatively, the PBAF complex may compensate for loss of BAF complexes in these cells.\nIn addition to  ARID1A  mutation, OCCC and OEC are characterized by activation of the PI3K/AKT pathway through activating  PIK3CA  mutation or inactivating the tumor suppressor  PTEN . Notably,  ARID1A  mutation often co-exists with  PIK3CA  mutation or  PTEN  inactivation. This suggests that  ARID1A  mutation synergizes with  PIK3CA  mutation or  PTEN  loss to promote OCCC or OEC. Indeed, genetic mouse modeling studies show that ARID1A loss, PIK3CA activation or PTEN loss alone is not sufficient to drive tumorigenesis ( 15 , 16 ). However, a combination of ARID1A loss with either PIK3CA activation or PTEN loss results in the development of OCCC or OEC, respectively ( 15 , 16 ). Interestingly, PIK3IP1, a suppressor of the PI3K/AKT signaling, is a target of ARID1A-mediated transcription activation ( 17 ). Thus, ARID1A loss may synergize with activation of PI3K/AKT signaling through further enhancing the oncogenic signaling.\nTP53  and  ARID1A  mutation are typically mutually exclusive in OCCC and OEC ( 18 ). This mutational pattern typically occurs for  TP53  and  ARID1A  mutations in other cancer types ( 19 ). This suggests that ARID1A and TP53 may function in the same pathway. The current literature supports that ARID1A regulates p53’s function in both cell growth arrest and apoptosis. ARID1A is a co-activator of p53 for the expression of its target genes such as p21 in mediating cell growth arrest ( 18 ). However, ARID1A regulates p53’s role in apoptosis by affecting lysine 120 acetylation of p53 (p53K120Ac) through transcriptionally repressing HDAC6 ( 19 ). p53K120Ac’s mitochondrial localization promotes apoptosis through decreasing mitochondrial membrane potential. p53K120Ac levels are regulated by acetyltransferase TIP60 and deacetylase HDAC6. ARID1A inactivation upregulates HDAC6 to decrease p53K120Ac. Thus, ARID1A regulates the p53 pathway through two independent mechanisms: 1) controlling cell growth arrest by acting as a co-activator of p53 for its target cell cycle regulating genes such as p21; and 2) modulating apoptosis through transcription-independent, mitochondria-localizing p53K120Ac posttranslational modification by upregulating HDAC6.\nThe presence of  ARID1A  mutation in contiguous atypical endometriosis, the precursor lesions of OCCC and OEC, supports that  ARID1A  mutation is an early event during tumorigenesis ( 9 ). The driver role of  ARID1A  mutation has been validated using genetic mouse models with conditional ARID1A knockout ( 15 , 16 ). Interestingly, recurring  ARID1A  mutations are present in cases of deep-infiltrating endometriosis without concurrent malignancy ( 20 ). In contrast to EOC-associated endometriosis, deep-infiltrating endometriosis rarely leads to cancer. This suggests that intrinsic and/or tissue microenvironmental factors cooperate with  ARID1A  mutation to drive tumorigenesis in EOC-associated endometriosis. Revelation of these mechanistic insights will be critical in evaluating cancer risk associated with different types of endometriosis and developing potential cancer preventive measures for women with endometriosis.\nSCCOHT is a rare but highly aggressive ovarian malignancy that occurs mostly in young women. The traditional treatment of SCCOHT is surgical removal followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. Most adjuvant chemotherapy combinations include a platinum agent, but the prognosis of the disease remains dismal. In addition, radiation therapy is increasingly being incorporated, but the survival benefit remains inconclusive.\nNotably, SCCOHT is a monogenic disease with  SMARCA4  being the likely driver mutation ( 21 – 23 ).  SMARCA4  encodes the BRG1 catalytic subunit of BAF complexes. BRG1 acts as a tumor suppressor in these tumors. In contrast to  ARID1A  mutation in OCCCs, both alleles of the  SMARCA4  gene are inactivated in SCCOHT ( 21 , 23 ). This biallele inactivation can be due to one germline and one somatic mutation, loss of heterozygosity of the wildtype allele with a germline or somatic genetic inactivation, or two separate somatic mutations. Despite no family history of the disease, up to 50% of patients carry a germline mutation ( 22 ).\nSimilar to the mutual exclusivity between ARID1A and ARID1B, BRG1 and BRM are the mutually exclusive catalytic subunits of SWI/SNF complexes. Notably, cells with BRG1 loss are compensated by residual BRM-containing SWI/SNF complexes ( 24 ). However, BRM is also absent in SCOOHT due to epigenetic silencing ( 25 ). Both BRG1 and BRM are typically lost simultaneously in SCOOHT. Thus, SCOOHT cells are likely devoid of SWI/SNF complexes. It will be interesting to examine whether the survival of these cells depends on other non-SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complexes.\nEmerging evidence suggests that SCCOHT is highly immunogenic. The majority of SCCOHT are associated with expression of PD-L1, an immunosuppressive checkpoint protein, in both tumor and stromal cells such as macrophages ( 26 ). This correlates with strong T-cell infiltration. Thus, the PD-L1 pathway may act as an adaptive immune-resistant mechanism in SCCOHT. These findings suggest that although SCCOHT is a monogenic disease with low-mutational burden, it is a highly immunogenic tumor type.\n\nHigh-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) is the most common subtype (>70% of EOC cases) and accounts for the majority of EOC-associated mortalities. Analysis of HGSOC patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) revealed that  CARM1  is amplified in >10% and overexpressed in an additional ~10% of spontaneous HGSOC ( 27 ). In comparison, somatic  BRCA1/2  mutations occur in ~3–4% of these cases for each gene, which are among the most commonly mutated genes in HGSOC. HGSOC is genetically heterogeneous. Thus, it is imperative that therapeutic strategies must be personalized by targeting distinct molecular subsets of HGSOC.\nCARM1, also known as PRMT4, is a type I protein arginine methyltransferase (PRMT) that asymmetrically dimethylates protein substrates on arginine residues.  CARM1  is located at 19p13.2. Emerging evidence suggests that CARM1 functions as an oncogene in human cancers. High levels of CARM1 expression have been observed in several cancer types, including breast, colon and prostate. Interestingly,  CARM1  amplification does not typically occur in HGSOC with mutations in  BRCA1/2 . Thus, there is an even greater need for developing therapeutic approaches that correlate with CARM1 status. This is because platinum-based chemotherapy, the current standard of care, and emerging treatment with PARP inhibitors are typically more effective in patients with  BRCA1/2  inactivation.\nSWI/SNF subunits such as  ARID1A  are not mutated in HGSOC where  CARM1  is amplified ( 27 ). Interestingly, BAF155, a core subunit of the SWI/SNF complex is a substrate of CARM1 ( 28 ). Indeed, BAF155 methylation (BAF155Me) is regulated by CARM1 in HGSOCs ( 27 ). Thus, SWI/SNF complexes are regulated by CARM1 in HGOSCs.\n\nSince the discovery of  ARID1A  mutation in endometriosis-associated OCCC and OEC, and  SMARCA4  mutation in SCCOHT, several targeted therapeutic strategies have been explored in preclinical settings. Some of these newly discovered approaches are entering clinical trials ( Table 2 ). These targeted approaches can be broadly divided into the following categories: 1) epigenetic synthetic lethality; 2) activation of pro-apoptotic role of wildtype p53; 3) checkpoint blockaded immunotherapy; 4) DNA damage signalling inhibitors; and 5) cellular kinase signalling pathways.\nThe antagonistic roles of SWI/SNF and polycomb proteins in gene transcription were initially suggested from genetic studies in  Drosophila  ( 29 ). In mammalian cells, recruitment of BAF complexes results in a rapid eviction of polycomb complexes in an ATP-dependent manner ( 30 , 31 ). This suggests a synthetic lethality between inaction of the SWI/SNF complex and inhibition of polycomb activity. EZH2, the catalytic subunit of polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2), silences gene expression by generating the lysine 27 trimethylation mark on histone H3 (H3K27Me3). Highly specific small molecule EZH2 inhibitors have been developed ( 32 – 34 ). Inhibition of EZH2 activity by these newly developed small molecule inhibitors suppresses the growth of  ARID1A -mutated OCCC or OEC ( 17 , 35 , 36 ) and  SMARCA4 -mutated SCCOHT cells ( 37 ). In contrast, EZH2 inhibitors have minimal effects on the growth of  ARID1A  or  SMARCA4  wildtype cells. In contrast to chemotherapy or existing targeted therapies, EZH2 inhibitors’ growth inhibitory effects take longer treatment to achieve. This feature of EZH2 inhibitors may reflect the requirement of cell division to dilute H3K27Me3 to a threshold to be effective. The best assay to achieve this effect is to perform the experiments either in three dimensional cultures using Matrigel extracellular matrix or in anchorage-independent growth in soft agar.\nMechanistically, ARID1A activates, whereas EZH2 inhibits, ARID1A/EZH2 direct target genes ( 17 ). PIK3IP, an ARID1A/EZH2 target PIK3K inhibitor, plays a key role in the observed selectivity ( 17 ). There is evidence to suggest that non-catalytic activity of PRC2 may also contribute to the observed selectivity against SWI/SNF inactivation ( 35 ). However, catalytic activity-independent function of PRC2, such as genetic knockdown of EZH2, suppresses the growth of ovarian cancer cells regardless of the mutational status of SWI/SNF complexes. Thus, only the catalytic activity of PRC2 may constitute a therapy window in selectively targeting cancers with mutations in SWI/SNF complexes with precision.\nEpigenetic gene silencing is often achieved by a coordinated action of histone modifying co-repressors. HDAC2 interacts with EZH2 in an ARID1A status-dependent manner ( 13 ). HDAC2 functions as a co-repressor of EZH2 to suppress the expression of EZH2/ARID1A target tumor suppressor genes such as PIK3IP1 to inhibit proliferation and promote apoptosis. Indeed, growth inhibition and apoptosis induced by HDAC2 and EZH2 inhibition are comparable in  ARID1A -mutated cells. Consistently,  ARID1A  mutation confers sensitivity to pan-HDAC inhibitors such as SAHA in OCCC. This is correlated with enhanced growth suppression induced by the inhibition of HDAC2 activity in  ARID1A -mutated cells. These studies highlight the immediate translational potential by repurposing FDA-approved pan-HDAC inhibitors for  ARID1A -mutated ovarian cancers.\nBRD2 is a member of the bromodomain and extra terminal domain (BET) family of proteins. In an unbiased screen, inhibition of BRD2 was predominantly lethal in  ARID1A  mutated OCCC cells ( 38 ). This correlates with a suppression of the expression of multiple SWI/SNF subunits including the ARID1A mutually exclusive subunit ARID1B, supporting the notion that sensitization of  ARID1A -mutated cell to BRD2 inhibition is due to synthetic lethality with  ARID1A  mutation and ARID1B suppression. Indeed, small molecule BET inhibitors suppress proliferation of  ARID1A -mutated OCCCs. However, the response to BET inhibitors is heterogeneous and does not have a perfect separation based on  ARID1A  mutational status. This is consistent with the complex nature of BET inhibitor-induced changes in transcriptional profiles.\nMutual exclusivity between  ARID1A  and  TP53  mutations is observed across human cancer types ( 16 , 19 ). This raises the possibility of targeting wildtype p53 in  ARID1A -mutated cancers. ARID1A inactivation upregulates HDAC6, and HDAC6 directly deacetylates the apoptosis-promoting p53K120Ac post-translational modification ( 19 ). p53K120Ac selectively regulates apoptosis but does not affect the expression of cell cycle regulatory p53 target genes such as  CDKN1A  ( 19 ). Thus,  ARID1A  mutation contributes to inactivation of p53’s apoptosis-promoting function by suppressing apoptosis-promoting p53K120Ac. HDAC6 activity is essential in  ARID1A -mutated ovarian cancers. Inhibition of HDAC6 activity using a clinically applicable small molecule inhibitor significantly improved the survival of mice bearing  ARID1A -mutated tumors ( 19 ). This correlated with the suppression of growth and dissemination of  ARID1A -mutated, but not wildtype, tumors. These findings also suggest that stabilizers of wildtype p53 (such as Nutlin) may have a similar therapeutic benefit as inhibition of HDAC6 in  ARID1A -mutated cells. However, knockdown of other SWI/SNF subunits such as BRG1 does not affect HDAC6 inhibitor sensitivity ( 19 ). This is due to a compensation of BRG1 loss by the mutually exclusive catalytic subunit BRM on the  HDAC6  gene promoter ( 19 ). This suggests that HDAC6 upregulation is unique to ARID1A inactivation, likely due to non-redundant roles played by ARID1A, ARID1B and ARID2 in regulating gene transcription.\nIn  SMARCA4 -mutated SCCOHT, PD-L1 is expressed in both tumor and stromal cells, and strong T-cell infiltration is observed in the majority of tumors ( 26 ). Consistently, emerging clinical evidence suggests that checkpoint blockades such as anti-PD-1 are effective in SCCOHTs ( 26 ). This suggests that inactivation of SWI/SNF complexes may sensitize tumors to checkpoint blockade immunotherapy. In clear cell renal cell cancer (ccRCC), patients who responded positively to anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 therapy often carry loss of function mutation in the  PBRM1  subunit of the PBAF complex ( 39 ). In an independent loss of function screen in melanoma cells, PBAF-specific BRD7, ARID2 and PBRM1 were identified as positive hits in conferring susceptibility to T cell-mediated killing ( 40 ). The PBAF complex contributes to cancer cell immune resistance through control of interferon gamma (IFNγ)-stimulated gene expression. Notably, PBAF cooperates with EZH2 in silencing IFNγ target gene expression. Indeed, EZH2 inhibition enhances checkpoint blockage immunotherapy and the recruitment of cytotoxic T cells into the tumor microenvironment ( 41 , 42 ).\nInterestingly, ARID1A interacts with the mismatch repair (MMR) protein MSH2, and ARID1A inactivation impairs MMR ( 43 ). Similar findings were also observed when the catalytic subunit SMARCA4 was depleted, suggesting that the SWI/SNF complex may be required for MMR. Consistently,  ARID1A  mutations are associated with a high mutation load in the TCGA datasets and  ARID1A  mutations are enriched in tumors with microsatellite instability. Notably, MMR-deficiency is linked to the susceptibility to immune checkpoint blockade due to an increase in neoantigen load and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. Indeed, in an ovarian cancer syngeneic mouse model, ARID1A inactivation renders ovarian tumors more sensitive to an anti-PD-L1 treatment. However, anti-PD-L1 treatment only marginally improved the survival of ARID1A-deficient mice ( 43 ). This suggests that combinational approaches are necessary to improve the efficacy of checkpoint blockade therapy in  ARID1A  mutated cancers.\nARID1A inactivation sensitizes cells to inhibition of the DNA damage checkpoint kinase ATR by clinically applicable inhibitors ( 44 ). This correlates with defects in topoisomerase 2A and cell cycle progression induced by ARID1A inactivation. Consequently, ATR inhibition triggers premature mitotic entry, genomic instability and apoptosis. Consistently, ARID1A is recruited to DNA double strand breaks through its interaction with ATR ( 45 ). In HCT116 colon cancer cell line with or without ARID1A knockout models, ARID1A inactivation leads to impaired checkpoint activation and sensitizes cells to DNA damage-inducing treatment such as PARP inhibitors. In addition to these targeted approaches, there is evidence to suggest that radiation therapy might be beneficial for a subset of OCCC patients. However, it is unclear whether  ARID1A  mutation can predict response to radiation therapy in OCCC patients.\nConsistent with the finding that ARID1A mutation and PI3K/AKT signaling are epistatic in driving OCCC and OEC ( 15 , 16 ), ARID1A positively regulates the expression of PIK3IP1, an inhibitor of PI3K ( 17 ).  ARID1A  mutational status in OCCCs correlates with an increase in phosphor-AKT levels. Several studies show that  ARID1A -mutated cells are more sensitive to inhibition of PI3K/AKT signaling using small molecule inhibitors ( 15 ). In addition, ARID1A cooperates with PI3K/AKT regulated NFκb signaling to promote the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL6 ( 46 ). Inhibition of NFκb activity or neutralization of the secreted IL6 is tumor suppressive in ARID1A inactivated OCCCs ( 15 , 46 ).\nIn a focused drug screen, tyrosine-kinase inhibitor Dasatinib was identified as a synthetic lethal drug in  ARID1A -mutated OCCC cells ( 47 ). The sensitivity of ARID1A-inactivated cells to Dasatinib is associated with G1-S cell cycle checkpoint and is p21 and pRb dependent. YES1 kinase plays a key role in the observed growth inhibition induced by Dasatinib in ARID1A inactivated cells. In addition, FDA-approved, tyrosine-kinase inhibitor Ponatinib was identified to show antitumor activity in SCCOHT with  SMARCA4  mutations ( 48 ). This is due to inhibition of multiple receptor tyrosine kinases by Ponatinib.\n\nAlthough HGSOCs typically lack genetic mutations in the subunits of SWI/SNF complexes, recent discovery suggests that CARM1 regulates the antagonism between SWI/SNF and PRC2 complexes ( 27 , 28 ). CARM1-mediated methylation of the SWI/SNF subunit BAF155 leads to the switch from BAF155 to EZH2 at the promoters of the pro-apoptotic EZH2/BAF155 target genes. Indeed, CARM1 upregulated HGSOC are selectively sensitive to EZH2 inhibitors ( 27 ).\nThus, in three different subtypes of ovarian cancer, the antagonism between SWI/SNF and PRC2 complexes are altered in three distinct manners, namely  ARID1A  mutation in OCCC and OEC,  SMARC4  mutation in SCCOHT, and CARM1 upregulation in HGSOC. The molecular basis of the observed histological subtype specificities of SWI/SNF alterations is intriguing. One possibility is that this reflects different roles played by these SWI/SNF subunits during tissue development and differentiation. However, for potential therapeutic strategies, these different flavors of antagonism between SWI/SNF and PRC2 complexes can all be leveraged for using small molecule EZH2 inhibitors.\n\nSince the discoveries of specific SWI/SNF subunit mutations in various histological subtypes of ovarian cancer, substantial progress has been made in both understanding the mechanistic basis of how these alterations contribute to tumorigenesis and the development of mechanism-guided precision medicine. Some of these newly discovered approaches are moving into clinical development ( Table 2 ).\nPrevious clinical experience with targeted therapy and emerging evidence with checkpoint blockade immunotherapy show that one single agent will not likely deliver a cure for cancer due to intrinsic and/or acquired resistance. Thus, combinatory therapies offer the best hope for eventual defeat of ovarian cancer with SWI/SNF alterations, one subtype at a time. However, these combinatory strategies will be personalized based on the genetic and immunological makeup of a patient’s tumor. Given the emerging potential of immunotherapy and the power of epigenetic modulation of immune response in tumor microenvironments, a combination of epigenetic and immunological therapies will likely be most promising.\nEZH2 inhibition will not only induce synthetic lethality in ovarian tumor cells with  ARID1A  mutation,  SMARCA4  mutation or  CARM1  amplification, but also enhance the recruitment of cytotoxic T cells to the tumor microenvironment ( 42 ). Likewise, HDAC6 inhibitors induce apoptosis in  ARID1A -mutated tumor cells ( 19 ), while enhancing T cell activation and improving the function of antigen-presenting cells to boost anti-tumor immunity ( 49 ). Similarly, BET inhibitors suppress PD-L1 expression and enhance T cell function ( 50 ). In contrast, targeted small-molecule inhibitors of cell signaling pathways or DNA damage agents may negatively impact tumor immunoenvironments. In summary, we propose that a combination of epigenetic inhibitors (e.g., EZH2, HDAC6, pan-HDAC or BET inhibitors) and immunotherapy such as checkpoint blockades (e.g., anti-PD-L1 or anti-PD1) has significant potential in transforming the clinical management of subtypes of ovarian cancer with SWI/SNF alterations. These mechanistic and clinical insights could serve as a paradigm for developing therapeutics for other cancer types with SWI/SNF alterations, the most frequent epigenetic change in human cancers.","source_license":"public-domain-us","license_restricted":false}