{"paper_id":"cb003168-6d90-467c-a2b8-b6c8d2361cb6","body_text":"In recent years, the fertility problem of infertile women has become a major challenge for reproductive doctors. Assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) are an important alternative to solve the problem of infertile women. However, the success of pregnancy depends on various factors, including gamete quality, uterine receptivity and immune factors. Among them, the key factors affecting infertile women are the decrease in the number and quality of oocytes.\nAt present, indicators for evaluating ovarian reserve function include age, follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), and antral follicle count (AFC). Among them, AMH is a member of the transforming growth factor β (TGF- β ) superfamily. It is a dimer glycoprotein formed by disulfide bonds. In women, antral follicles and small follicles secrete AMH, which has the effect of promoting growth and differentiation. The level of AMH is positively correlated with the number of antral follicles and small follicles in the ovary. Studies have shown that AMH can not only reflect the number of antral follicles but also the quality of oocytes ( 1 ,  2 ). Generally, it is believed that AMH is maintained throughout the menstrual cycle and it is stable ( 3 – 5 ). Therefore, AMH is considered to be the best indicator to evaluate ovarian reserve. The role of AMH in ART has always been one of the research hotspots in the field of assisted reproduction. Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) is a key part of assisted reproductive technology and plays a vital role in the success or failure of treatment. Several clinical studies have shown that patients with low AMH levels have a higher cancellation rate of oocytes retrieval cycles because of low ovarian response ( 6 – 9 ). Some researchers also pointed out that AMH levels are correlated with the number of oocytes retrieved, fertilization rate, number of embryos available and clinical pregnancy ( 10 – 12 ). However, the relationship between AMH and the number of oocytes retrieved in infertile women at different ages is yet to be studied.\nHerein, we analyze the correlation between AMH and the number of retrieved oocytes obtained by COH in women of different ages and explores the factors affecting  in vitro  fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) in clinical pregnancy of infertile women to provide a basis for infertile women to choosing assisted reproduction strategies.\n\nThis is a retrospective study of infertile women who received IVF-ET or intracytoplasmic sperm injection and embryo transfer ICSI-ET treatment in the reproductive center of XX hospital from October 2018 and September 2019. Estimate sample size based on “multi-stage random sampling survey”. The sample size was estimated to obtain the prevalence within 1 of the true value at 1 level of significance. This kind of sample design has an impact, called design effect on sampling variability. As a result of this impact, the obtained sample size was multiplied by 1.5 and the outcome was taken as the final sample size. Patients who (1) underwent IVF-ET or ICSI-ET treatment; (2) promoted ovulation through long, short or antagonist programs; and (3) had bilateral ovaries based on transvaginal color Doppler ultrasound were included. Patients with (1) metabolic abnormalities or endocrine diseases (such as polycystic ovary syndrome, diabetes, abnormal thyroid function, Cushing syndrome, etc.); (2) chromosomal abnormalities in either spouse; (3) a history of ovarian surgery; (4) infectious diseases, autoimmune diseases, allergic diseases, tumors, hepatitis and other diseases; (5) a history of thrombosis or family history; and (6) endometriosis were excluded.\nPatient data on medical records, age, body mass index (BMI), years of infertility, basic FSH, basic luteinizing hormone (LH), basic estradiol (E 2 ), AMH level, AFC, gonadotropins (Gn) medication days, Gn dosage, endometrial thickness (mm) on transplantation day, the number of oocytes obtained, the number of mature oocytes obtained, the number of embryos transferred and clinical pregnancy status etc. were collected.\nThe blood samples of all patients were stored at -20°C and tested by an enzyme-linked immunoassay kit (ELISA, AMH quantitative test kit, Guangzhou Kangrun Biotechnology Co., Ltd.). The minimum detectable AMH concentration was 0.06 ng/ml, the relevant coefficient (r) ≥0.9900, the relative deviation of the measurement results was within 10% and the coefficient of variation (CV) ≤ 10%.\nAccording to the development and morphological evaluation of the oocyte, the oocyte is divided into three classes, mature oocyte (MII stage): the endogenous foaming of the oocyte cytoplasm disappears and the first polar body can be seen in the perivitelline space; the intermediate mature oocyte (MI phase): the endogenous foaming of the oocyte cytoplasm disappears and the perivitelline space is not seen first in the polar body; immature oocytes (GV stage): germinal follicles can be seen in the cytoplasm. Based on the oocyte maturity criterion, the number of mature oocytes obtained in this study was that obtained at the MII stage ( 13 ).\nAccording to embryo development speed and morphological score, embryos are divided into 4 Grades, Grade I: uniform blastomere size, homogeneous and transparent cytoplasm, no debris; Grade II: uniform blastomere size, with debris <20%; Grade III: unequal size of blastomeres, with more fragments (20–50%); Grade IV: unequal size of blastomeres, fragments >50%. Based on these embryo quality determination standards, Grades I and II embryos were high-quality embryos in our laboratory.\nR a t e   o f   r e t r i e v e d   m a t u r e   o o c y t e s = n u m b e r   o f   r e t r i e v e d   m a t u r e   o o c y t e s / n u m b e r   o f   r e t r i e v e d   o o c y t e s ( % )\nC l i n i c a l   p r e g n a n c y   r a t e = n u m b e r   o f   c l i n i c a l   p r e g n a n c y   c y c l e s / n u m b e r   o f   h y p e r s t i m u l a t i o n   c y c l e s   ( % )\nAll data were reported as number and percentage, while continuous data were reported as mean ± standard deviation (SD). We used the chi-square (χ 2 ) test or the Fisher’s exact test to compare categorical data. Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test was applied to compare nonnormally continuous variables. Pearson correlation and multiple linear regression were used to analyze the correlation between AMH level and the number of oocytes obtained. Logistic regression models were used to evaluate the influencing factors of clinical pregnancy. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 23.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, Ill). A value of  p  < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.\n\nA total of 314 patients aged between 22 and 43 years old were selected, with an average age of 31.0 ± 4.5 years old. The infertility period was between 0 and 21 years, with an average age of 4.4 years. Detailed patient characteristics are shown in  \n Table 1 \n .\nBaseline clinical parameters of the patients.\nBMI, body mass index; FSH, follicle stimulating hormone; LH, luteinizing hormone E 2 , estradiol; AMH, Anti-Mullerian hormone; Gn, gonadotropins.\nIn this study, the ages of the female patients were divided into three groups: 22–28, 29–35, and 36–43 years old. The duration of infertility varied among the age groups ( \n Table 2 \n ). The average duration of infertility increased with an increase in age. Women between the ages of 36 and 43 had the longest duration of infertility, with an average of about 5.7 years. The total dosage of basal FSH and Gn increased with an increase in age, while basal LH, basic E 2 , basic prolactin (PRL), basic testosterone (T), AMH, and the number of oocytes harvested and the number of MII retrieved oocytes all showed a decreasing trend. Age (woman and man), infertility years, basic PRL, and AMH showed significant differences in different age groups.\nBaseline data of different age groups of women.\nBMI, body mass index; FSH, follicle stimulating hormone; LH, luteinizing hormone E 2 , estradiol; AMH, Anti-Mullerian hormone; Gn, gonadotropins.\nFigure 1 \n  shows the average and SD of AMH levels for women of different ages. There was a significant difference in the AMH levels among the three age groups. In addition, AMH levels decreased with increasing age ( \n Table 3 \n ). AMH levels of women aged 22–28 were significantly higher than those aged 29–35. However, AMH levels of women aged 29–35 were significantly higher than those aged 36–43. Similarly, AMH levels of women aged 22–28 were significantly higher than those aged 36–43.\nAMH levels in women of different ages.\nAMH levels in women of different ages.\nAMH, Anti-Mullerian hormone.\nFigure 2 \n  and  \n Table 4 \n  show the correlation between the AMH level and the number of oocytes obtained in women of different ages. Overall, in women of all ages, the level of AMH was positively correlated with the number of oocytes retrieved ( r  = 0.335,  p  < 0.001;  \n Figure 2A \n ). The level of AMH was positively correlated with the number of retrieved oocytes in women aged 22–28 ( r  = 0.164,  p  < 0.061;  \n Figure 2B \n ) but not statistically significant due to the small sample size and sampling errors. In addition, the level of AMH was positively correlated with the number of oocytes obtained in women aged 29–35 ( r  = 0.356,  p  < 0.001;  \n Figure 2C \n ). Moreover, there was a positive correlation between the level of AMH and the number of oocytes obtained in women aged 36–43 ( r = 0.461,  p  < 0.001;  \n Figure 2D \n ).\nRelationship between AMH levels and the number of retrieved oocytes in different age groups.  (A)  Overall relationship.  (B)  22–28 years.  (C)  29–35 years.  (D)  36–43 years.\nThe relationship between AMH and the number of eggs obtained in different age groups.\nAMH, Anti-Mullerian hormone.\nAge, number of years of infertility, BMI, basic FSH, basic LH, basic E 2 , basic PRL, basic T, basic progesterone (P), AMH, intimal thickness, number of oocytes harvested, and total Gn dosage of pregnant and non-pregnant patients were compared. The total number of Gn days, the number of embryos transferred, the number of MII oocytes and the rate of mature oocytes were statistically significant in the female age, the number of oocytes obtained and the number of embryos transferred between the two groups. The average age of women in the pregnant group and the non-pregnant group was 30.6 ± 4.4 years and 32.2 ± 4.6 years, respectively. The average age of the pregnant group was lower than that of the non-pregnant group ( p  < 0.001). The number of oocytes obtained and the number of embryos transferred was significantly higher in the pregnant group than in the non-pregnant group and the difference was statistically significant ( \n Table 5 \n ).\nComparison of data between pregnant group and non-pregnant group.\nBMI, body mass index; FSH, follicle stimulating hormone; LH, luteinizing hormone E 2 , estradiol; AMH, Anti-Mullerian hormone; Gn, gonadotropins.\nAMH levels were classified into low (<2.74), medium (2.74–5.66) and high (≥5.66) according to tertiles. Age (woman and man), basic LH, the number of oocytes obtained, the total amount of Gn, the number of embryos transferred, the number of MII oocytes, basic FSH, basic PRL, and the thickness of the intima were significantly different among the three AMH groups. As shown in  \n Table 6 \n , the female and male patients in the high AMH group were the youngest, 29.40 ± 4.0 and 31.6 ± 4.8 years old, respectively, while the patients in the low AMH group were the oldest, 32.60 ± 4.5 and 34.9 ± 6.5 years old, respectively. The high AMH group had a lower basal FSH level of 8.2 ± 2.5 mIU/ml, while the low AMH level group had the highest basal LH level of 9.9 ± 4.1 mIU/ml. LH and the number of oocytes obtained, the number of embryos transferred and the number of MII oocytes of the high AMH group were higher. PRL of the middle-level AMH group was the highest, 16.52 ± 16.38. The Gn dosage of the high AMH group was the lowest, 1998.0 ± 726.9 ( \n Table 6 \n ).\nComparison of data of different AMH levels.\nBMI, body mass index; FSH, follicle stimulating hormone; LH, luteinizing hormone E 2 , estradiol; AMH, Anti-Mullerian hormone; Gn, gonadotropins.\nStatistically significant variables were included in the multivariate logistic regression model. The results showed that age (OR = 0.574 95% CI: 0.350–0.940,  p  = 0.027), AMH (OR = 1.430 95% CI: 1.130–1.820,  p  = 0.003) and the number of oocytes obtained (OR = 1.360 95% CI: 1.030–1.790,  p  = 0.032) were independent factors influencing clinical pregnancy ( \n Table 7 \n ).\nLogistic regression analysis of clinical pregnancy and abortion factors.\nBMI, body mass index; FSH, follicle stimulating hormone; LH, luteinizing hormone E 2 , estradiol; AMH, Anti-Mullerian hormone; Gn, gonadotropins.\n\nIn recent years, due to low ovarian reserve, infertile women have faced problems such as low pregnancy rate and live birth rate, which has become a major challenge for reproductive physicians. The number and quality of women’s oocytes decrease with age but the fertility of women of the same age varies greatly, hence, the accuracy of predicting pregnancy outcome by age only is low. The level of AMH remains relatively constant during the menstrual cycle and can reflect ovarian reserve. Therefore, the application of AMH in advanced-age ARTs has become one of the research hotspots among local and international scholars. A total of 314 advanced-age infertile women were included in this study and the AMH variation range of different age groups of infertile women was established. The correlation between AMH and the number of ovulation-inducing women in different age groups was analyzed, and the independent influence of clinical pregnancy was explored. This should help to guide elderly infertile women seeking IVF treatment.\nBecause of the lack of a standardized method to measure AMH levels and variation in AMH levels caused by different methods ( 6 ,  14 ), it is necessary to establish a reference range for AMH for different age groups. The patients included in this study were aged 22–43 years old, with an average age of 31.0 ± 4.5 years. The patients were divided into three groups according to their ages. The levels of AMH of patients of different age groups were described and compared. It was found that the average AMH level increased with age. The levels of AMH exhibited a decreasing trend and varied widely in each age group. This is consistent with the results of previous studies ( 15 ,  16 ). AMH is considered the most reliable indicator of ovarian reserve. AMH can reflect the number of antral follicles and is directly proportional to the number of oocytes obtained in hyperstimulation ( 17 ,  18 ). Studies have shown that patients with the same AMH level of different ages have a lower number of ovulation-stimulation than patients in the elderly group, which indicates that age is one of the key factors in the study of ovarian stimulation effects ( 19 ). This study compared the correlation between the level of AMH and the number of oocytes obtained in infertile women of different ages and found that the level of AMH in infertile women was positively correlated with the number of oocytes obtained. A further comparison of the levels of AMH in different age groups showed that the levels of AMH in women aged 29–43 were linearly correlated with the number of oocytes harvested, with a statistical significance, which is consistent with findings from previous research ( 20 – 22 ).\nWe also compared the pregnant and the non-pregnant groups and found that there were statistical differences in the age, the number of oocytes retrieved and the number of embryos transferred between the two groups, suggesting that these three variables could be factors affecting clinical pregnancy.\nAfter classifying the levels of AMH in advanced-age infertile women into three groups (low, medium and high), we found that age, basic LH, number of oocytes harvested, total Gn dosage, number of embryos transferred, number of MII oocytes, basic FSH, basic PRL and intimal thickness were significantly different among the groups. However, our findings are different from a German study ( 8 ) perhaps due to the age of the included population; age affects the outcome of assisted pregnancy.\nA European study of women over 40 years of age found that compared with the non-pregnant group, patients in the pregnant group had lower ages and higher levels of AFC and AMH, but considered that AMH was related to those over 40 years of age.\nThe pregnancy outcome in women based on IVF-ET is not relevant ( 23 ). Some researchers believe that AMH can predict the clinical pregnancy of IVF in elderly women. Lee analyzed the relationship between the level of AMH and clinical pregnancy in women older than 40 years and reported that AMH is an independent factor that can predict pregnancy ( 24 ). The present study further compared the clinical data of the pregnant and the non-pregnant groups and the data of patients with different AMH levels. There were differences in factors such as age, AMH and the number of oocytes obtained between the groups. After incorporating them into the multivariate logistic regression model, age, AMH and the number of oocytes obtained were independent factors in clinical pregnancy. Two European and American studies also found that age and AMH were independent factors predicting IVF pregnancy outcome, which is consistent with our results ( 25 ,  26 ).\nThis study had some strengths and weaknesses. First, to reduce selection bias, this study only included patients in the first IVF cycle. In addition, patients were further grouped by age to reduce the heterogeneity caused by age changes and the relationship between the number of oocytes obtained and AMH was analyzed by age. However, this study had a small sample size and is a retrospective study with many confounding factors. Furthermore, some variables were not considered in the study.\n\nWe found that the level of AMH in infertile women decreased with age and the number of oocytes obtained in infertile women aged 29–43 was positively correlated with AMH. Age, AMH and the number of oocytes obtained were independent factors influencing clinical pregnancy. Moreover, the number of oocytes and embryo transferred in the pregnant group was significantly higher than that in the non-pregnant group. Furthermore, the clinical pregnancy was affected by age, AMH and number of oocytes. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to retrospectively analyze the correlation between AMH and the number of oocytes obtained by COH in women of different ages. This information could help understand the relationship between AMH and IVF-ET IN clinical pregnancy.\n\nThe raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.\n\nThe studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by Ethics Committee of Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University. Written informed consent for participation was not required for this study in accordance with the national legislation and the institutional requirements.\n\nXS and YL conceived and designed the study. SL and XL collected patient data, XM and LL reviewed and edited the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.\n\nThe study was supported by the project of Luzhou science and Technology Bureau (no. 16188) and Science Foundation of Southwest Medical University (no. 2016217).\n\nThe authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.","source_license":"CC-BY-4.0","license_restricted":false}