{"paper_id":"c924ef95-dd80-473c-ad43-bfeee4c032d0","body_text":"Predicting high-intensity focused ultrasound efficacy in adenomyosis treatment based on magnetic resonance (MR) radiomics and clinical-imaging features\nAffiliations & Notes\nDepartment of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China\nArticle Info\nPublication History:\nReceived August 22, 2024; Revised November 9, 2024; Accepted December 9, 2024; Published online December 14, 2024\nDOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2024.106778 External LinkAlso available on ScienceDirect External Link\nCopyright: © 2024 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.\nLinked Articles\nDownload started\nOkReferences\n1.\nLi, Z. ∙ Zhang, J. ∙ Song, Y. ...\nUtilization of radiomics to predict long-term outcome of magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound ablation therapy in adenomyosis\nEur Radiol. 2021; 31:392-402\n2.\nUpson, K. ∙ Missmer, S.A.\nEpidemiology of adenomyosis\nSemin Reprod Med. 2020; 38:89-107\n3.\nEkin, M. ∙ Cengiz, H. ∙ Öztürk, E. ...\nGenitourinary symptoms in patients with adenomyosis\nInt Urogynecol J. 2013; 24:509-512\n4.\nMoawad, G. ∙ Kheil, M.H. ∙ Ayoubi, J.M. ...\nAdenomyosis and infertility\nJ Assist Reprod Genet. 2022; 39:1027-1031\n5.\nSzubert, M. ∙ Koziróg, E. ∙ Olszak, O. ...\nAdenomyosis and infertility-review of medical and surgical approaches\nInt J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18:1235\n6.\nChinese experts' consensus on diagnosis and treatment of adenomyosis\nZhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2020; 55:376-383\n7.\nDason, E.S. ∙ Maxim, M. ∙ Sanders, A. ...\nGuideline No. 437: diagnosis and management of adenomyosis\nJ Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2023; 45:417-429.e1\n8.\nJeng, C.J. ∙ Ou, K.Y. ∙ Long, C.Y. ...\n500 cases of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablated uterine fibroids and adenomyosis\nTaiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 59:865-871\n9.\nSiedek, F. ∙ Yeo, S.Y. ∙ Heijman, E. ...\nMagnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (MR-HIFU): technical background and overview of current clinical applications (Part 1)\nRofo. 2019; 191:522-530\n10.\nLee, J.S. ∙ Hong, G.Y. ∙ Park, B.J. ...\nUltrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment for uterine fibroid & adenomyosis: a single center experience from the Republic of Korea\nUltrason Sonochem. 2015; 27:682-687\n11.\nGong, C. ∙ Yang, B. ∙ Shi, Y. ...\nFactors influencing the ablative efficiency of high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) treatment for adenomyosis: a retrospective study\nInt J Hyperthermia. 2016; 32:496-503\n12.\nFan, L.X. ∙ Zhang, Y. ∙ Yang, L.L. ...\nAnalysis of related factors influencing postoperative recurrence of adenomyosis treated with HIFU\nArch Gynecol Obstet. 2024; 309:1765-1773\n13.\nZhong, Q. ∙ Yang, M.J. ∙ Hu, Y. ...\nFactors influencing treatment decisions in HIFU treatment of adenomyosis: a retrospective study\nFront Surg. 2022; 9, 941368\n14.\nChen, Y. ∙ Lin, S. ∙ Xie, X. ...\nSystematic review and meta-analysis of reproductive outcomes after high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) treatment of adenomyosis\nBest Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2024; 92, 102433\n15.\nSchrager, S. ∙ Yogendran, L. ∙ Marquez, C.M. ...\nAdenomyosis: diagnosis and management\nAm Fam Physician. 2022; 105:33-38\n16.\nO'Shea, A. ∙ Figueiredo, G. ∙ Lee, S.I.\nImaging diagnosis of adenomyosis\nSemin Reprod Med. 2020; 38:119-128\n17.\nZhang, M. ∙ Bazot, M. ∙ Tsatoumas, M. ...\nMRI of adenomyosis: where are we today?\nCan Assoc Radiol J. 2023; 74:58-68\n18.\nCelli, V. ∙ Dolciami, M. ∙ Ninkova, R. ...\nMRI and adenomyosis: what can radiologists evaluate?\nInt J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19\n19.\nLambin, P. ∙ Leijenaar, R.T.H. ∙ Deist, T.M. ...\nRadiomics: the bridge between medical imaging and personalized medicine\nNat Rev Clin Oncol. 2017; 14:749-762\n20.\nLi, C. ∙ He, Z. ∙ Lv, F. ...\nAn interpretable MRI-based radiomics model predicting the prognosis of high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation of uterine fibroids\nInsights Imaging. 2023; 14:129\n21.\nZheng, Y. ∙ Chen, L. ∙ Liu, M. ...\nPrediction of clinical outcome for high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation of uterine leiomyomas using multiparametric MRI radiomics-based machine leaning model\nFront Oncol. 2021; 11, 618604\n22.\nFan, T.Y. ∙ Zhang, L. ∙ Chen, W. ...\nFeasibility of MRI-guided high intensity focused ultrasound treatment for adenomyosis\nEur J Radiol. 2012; 81:3624-3630\n23.\nLiu, X. ∙ Wang, W. ∙ Wang, Y. ...\nClinical predictors of long-term success in ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation treatment for adenomyosis: a retrospective study\nMedicine (Baltimore). 2016; 95:e2443\n24.\nShui, L. ∙ Mao, S. ∙ Wu, Q. ...\nHigh-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for adenomyosis: two-year follow-up results\nUltrason Sonochem. 2015; 27:677-681\n25.\nYu, J.W. ∙ Yang, M.J. ∙ Jiang, L. ...\nFactors influencing USgHIFU ablation for adenomyosis with NPVR ≥ 50\nInt J Hyperthermia. 2023; 40, 2211753\n26.\nZhang, L. ∙ Rao, F. ∙ Setzen, R.\nHigh intensity focused ultrasound for the treatment of adenomyosis: selection criteria, efficacy, safety and fertility\nActa Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017; 96:707-714\n27.\nQin, S. ∙ Jiang, Y. ∙ Wang, F. ...\nDevelopment and validation of a combined model based on dual-sequence MRI radiomics for predicting the efficacy of high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation for hysteromyoma\nInt J Hyperthermia. 2023; 40, 2149862\n28.\nLi, J. ∙ Wang, W. ∙ Liao, L. ...\nAnalysis of the nonperfused volume ratio of adenomyosis from MRI images based on fewshot learning\nPhys Med Biol. 2021; 66, 045019\n29.\nOrsini, L.F. ∙ Salardi, S. ∙ Pilu, G. ...\nPelvic organs in premenarcheal girls: real-time ultrasonography\nRadiology. 1984; 153:113-116\n30.\nKeserci, B. ∙ Duc, N.M.\nMagnetic resonance imaging features influencing high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation of adenomyosis with a nonperfused volume ratio of ≥90% as a measure of clinical treatment success: retrospective multivariate analysis\nInt J Hyperthermia. 2018; 35:626-636\n31.\nZhou, M. ∙ Chen, J.Y. ∙ Tang, L.D. ...\nUltrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation for adenomyosis: the clinical experience of a single center\nFertil Steril. 2011; 95:900-905\n32.\nMa, S. ∙ Lv, F.J. ∙ Zheng, Y.N. ...\nValue of T2WI combined with DWI in predicting the non-perfusion volume ratio of HIFU treatment of adenomyosis\nJ Chin Clin Med Imaging. 2023; 34:46-50\nChinese\n33.\nWang, W. ∙ Wang, Y. ∙ Tang, J.\nSafety and efficacy of high intensity focused ultrasound ablation therapy for adenomyosis\nAcad Radiol. 2009; 16:1416-1423\n34.\nBurla, L. ∙ Sartoretti, E. ∙ Mannil, M. ...\nMRI-based radiomics as a Promising noninvasive diagnostic technique for adenomyosis\nJ Clin Med. 2024; 13:2344\n35.\nDu, C.C. ∙ Wang, Y.Q. ∙ Qu, D.C. ...\nMagnetic resonance imaging T2WI hyperintense foci number and the prognosis of adenomyosis after high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment\nInt J Gynaecol Obstet. 2021; 154:241-247\n36.\nBaker, K.G. ∙ Robertson, V.J. ∙ Duck, F.A.\nA review of therapeutic ultrasound: biophysical effects\nPhys Ther. 2001; 81:1351-1358\n37.\nGong, C. ∙ Setzen, R. ∙ Liu, Z. ...\nHigh intensity focused ultrasound treatment of adenomyosis: the relationship between the features of magnetic resonance imaging on T2 weighted images and the therapeutic efficacy\nEur J Radiol. 2017; 89:117-122","source_license":"public-domain-us","license_restricted":false}