{"paper_id":"c7570951-5d04-49b9-a82f-defb6aa2e2bf","body_text":"Abstract\nRobotic-assisted surgery has enabled more surgeons to perform delicate video laparoscopic surgeries. In gynecology, robotic surgery is used for benign and malignant diseases, with the flagship da Vinci platform approved in 2005. New other platforms are also fighting for market space. This chapter addresses the various platforms available to date with a focus on da Vinci, the various gynecological procedures, and perspectives for the future.\nAccess this chapter\nTax calculation will be finalised at checkout\nPurchases are for personal use only\nSimilar content being viewed by others\nReferences\nMargossian H, Garcia-Ruiz A, Falcone T, Goldberg JM, Attaran M, Miller JH, Gagner M. Robotically assisted laparoscopic tubal anastomosis in a porcine model: a pilot study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 1998;8:69–73.\nAlkatout I, Mettler L, Maass N, Ackermann J. Robotic surgery in gynecology. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2016;17:224–32.\nOleynikov D. Robotic surgery. Surg Clin N Am. 2008;88:1121–30.\nFreschi C, Ferrari V, Melfi F, Ferrari M, Mosca F, Cuschieri A. Technical review of the da Vinci surgical telemanipulator. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg. 2013;9:396–406.\nGosrisirikul C, Don Chang K, Raheem AA, Rha KH. New era of robotic surgical systems. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2018;11:291–9.\nGomes MTV, Machado AMN, Podgaec S, Barison GAS. Initial experience with single-port robotic hysterectomy. Einstein. 2017;15:476–80.\nHan ES, Advincula AP. Robotic surgery: advancements and inflection points in the field of gynecology. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2021;48:759–76.\nRao PP. Robotic surgery: new robots and finally some real competition! World J Urol. 2018;36:537–41.\nPeters BS, Armijo PR, Krause C, Choudhury SA, Oleynikov D. Review of emerging surgical robotic technology. Surg Endosc. 2018;32:1636–55.\nJena A-K-T. Home—avateramedical. www.avatera.eu/en/avatera-system. 2020. Accessed 5 Jan 2022.\nChang KD, Raheem AA, Choi YD, Chung BH, Rha KH. Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy using the Revo-i robotic surgical system: surgical technique and results of the first human trial. BJU Int. 2018;122:441–8.\nProfile V. Medicaroid’s hinotori surgical robot system approved in Japan. 2020.\nKoukourikis P, Rha KH. Robotic surgical systems in urology: what is currently available? Investig Clin Urol. 2021;62:14–22.\nMillan B, Nagpal S, Ding M, Lee JY, Kapoor A. A scoping review of emerging and established surgical robotic platforms with applications in urologic surgery. SIUJ. 2021;2:300–10.\nMoon AS, Garofalo J, Koirala P, Vu M-LT, Chuang L. Robotic surgery in gynecology. Surg Clin North Am. 2020;100:445–60.\nLawrie TA, Liu H, Lu D, Dowswell T, Song H, Wang L, Shi G. Robot-assisted surgery in gynaecology. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;4:CD011422.\nGiacomoni A, Concone G, Di Sandro S, Lauterio A, De Carlis L. The meaning of surgeon’s comfort in robotic surgery. Am J Surg. 2014;208:871–2.\nVisco AG, Advincula AP. Robotic gynecologic surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;112:1369–84.\nWhite S, Agarwal S, Ratnayake A. Anaesthesia for robotic gynaecological surgery. In: Textbook of gynecologic robotic surgery; 2018. p. 9–12.\nEinarsson JI, Hibner M, Advincula AP. Side docking: an alternative docking method for gynecologic robotic surgery. Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2011;4:123–5.\n[No title]. https://www.intuitive.com/en-us/-/media/ISI/Intuitive/Pdf/xi-x-ina-catalog-no-pricing-us-1052082.pdf. Accessed 4 Apr 2022.\nMonterossi G, Pedone Anchora L, Gueli Alletti S, Fagotti A, Fanfani F, Scambia G. The first European gynaecological procedure with the new surgical robot Hugo™ RAS. A total hysterectomy and salpingo-oophorectomy in a woman affected by BRCA-1 mutation. Facts Views Vis ObGyn. 2022;14:91–4.\nMcCarus SD. Senhance robotic platform system for gynecological surgery. JSLS. 2021;25:e2020.00075. https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2020.00075.\nMontlouis-Calixte J, Ripamonti B, Barabino G, Corsini T, Chauleur C. Senhance 3-mm robot-assisted surgery: experience on first 14 patients in France. J Robot Surg. 2019;13:643–7.\nPanico G, Campagna G, Vacca L, Caramazza D, Pizzacalla S, Rumolo V, Scambia G, Ercoli A. The Senhance ® assisted laparoscopy in urogynaecology: case report of sacral colpopexy with subtotal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy for pelvic organ prolapse : video article, to see the video use this link: https://qrco.de/bbdi3G. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2020;12:245–8.\nSiaulys R, Klimasauskiene V, Janusonis V, Ezerskiene V, Dulskas A, Samalavicius NE. Robotic gynaecological surgery using Senhance® robotic platform: single Centre experience with 100 cases. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2021;50:102031.\nFalavolti C, Gidaro S, Ruiz E, Altobelli E, Stark M, Ravasio G, Ravasio G, Lazzaretti SS, Buscarini M. Experimental nephrectomies using a novel Telesurgical system: (the Telelap ALF-X)-a pilot study. Surg Technol Int. 2014;25:37–41.\nRaheem AA, Troya IS, Kim DK, Kim SH, Won PD, Joon PS, Hyun GS, Rha KH. Robot-assisted fallopian tube transection and anastomosis using the new REVO-I robotic surgical system: feasibility in a chronic porcine model. BJU Int. 2016;118:604–9.\nMorton J, Hardwick RH, Tilney HS, Gudgeon AM, Jah A, Stevens L, Marecik S, Slack M. Preclinical evaluation of the versius surgical system, a new robot-assisted surgical device for use in minimal access general and colorectal procedures. Surg Endosc. 2021;35:2169–77.\nThomas BC, Slack M, Hussain M, Barber N, Pradhan A, Dinneen E, Stewart GD. Preclinical evaluation of the Versius surgical system, a new robot-assisted surgical device for use in minimal access renal and prostate surgery. Eur Urol Focus. 2021;7:444–52.\nPuntambekar SP, Goel A, Chandak S, Chitale M, Hivre M, Chahal H, Rajesh KN, Manerikar K. Feasibility of robotic radical hysterectomy (RRH) with a new robotic system. Experience at galaxy care laparoscopy institute. J Robot Surg. 2021;15:451–6.\nJena A-K-T. Made in Germany—avateramedical. https://www.avatera.eu/en/company/made-in-germany. Accessed 9 Jan 2022.\nWhooley S. Johnson & Johnson discloses two-year delay for ottava robot. In: MassDevice; 2021. https://www.massdevice.com/johnson-johnson-hits-snag-in-ottava-surgical-robot-development/. Accessed 4 Apr 2022.\nDiaz-Arrastia C, Jurnalov C, Gomez G, Townsend C Jr. Laparoscopic hysterectomy using a computer-enhanced surgical robot. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:1271–3.\nPayne TN, Dauterive FR. A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008;15:286–91.\nPitter MC, Gargiulo AR, Bonaventura LM, Lehman JS, Srouji SS. Pregnancy outcomes following robot-assisted myomectomy. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:99–108.\nRivas-López R, Sandoval-García-Travesí FA. Robotic surgery in gynecology: review of literature. Cir Cir. 2020;88:107–16.\nTruong M, Kim JH, Scheib S, Patzkowsky K. Advantages of robotics in benign gynecologic surgery. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2016;28:304–10.\nGomes MTV, Costa Porto BT, Parise Filho JP, Vasconcelos AL, Bottura BF, Marques RM. Safety model for the introduction of robotic surgery in gynecology. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2018;40:397–402.\nBarakat EE, Bedaiwy MA, Zimberg S, Nutter B, Nosseir M, Falcone T. Robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and abdominal myomectomy: a comparison of surgical outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117:256–66.\nGiudice LC. Clinical practice. Endometriosis. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:2389–98.\nKho RM, Andres MP, Borrelli GM, Neto JS, Zanluchi A, Abrão MS. Surgical treatment of different types of endometriosis: comparison of major society guidelines and preferred clinical algorithms. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;51:102–10.\nRestaino S, Mereu L, Finelli A, et al. Robotic surgery vs laparoscopic surgery in patients with diagnosis of endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Robot Surg. 2020;14:687–94.\nLuu THA, Jean Uy-Kroh M. New developments in surgery for endometriosis and pelvic pain. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2017;60:245–51.\nSoares T, Oliveira MA, Panisset K, Habib N, Rahman S, Klebanoff JS, Moawad GN. Diaphragmatic endometriosis and thoracic endometriosis syndrome: a review on diagnosis and treatment. Horm Mol Biol Clin Invest. 2021;43:137. https://doi.org/10.1515/hmbci-2020-0066.\nDelara R, Suárez-Salvador E, Magrina J, Magtibay P. Robotic excision of full-thickness diaphragmatic endometriosis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020;27:815.\nKo KJ, Lee K-S. Robotic Sacrocolpopexy for treatment of apical compartment prolapse. Int Neurourol J. 2020;24:97–110.\nRamirez PT, Frumovitz M, Pareja R, et al. Minimally invasive versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:1895–904.\nFalconer H, Palsdottir K, Stalberg K, et al. Robot-assisted approach to cervical cancer (RACC): an international multi-center, open-label randomized controlled trial. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2019;29:1072–6.\nNitecki R, Ramirez PT, Frumovitz M, Krause KJ, Tergas AI, Wright JD, Rauh-Hain JA, Melamed A. Survival after minimally invasive vs open radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol. 2020;6:1019–27.\nObermair A, Asher R, Pareja R, et al. Incidence of adverse events in minimally invasive vs open radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer: results of a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;222:249.e1–249.e10.\nSalvo G, Pareja R, Ramirez PT. Minimally invasive radical trachelectomy: considerations on surgical approach. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2021;75:113–22.\nDargent D, Martin X, Sacchetoni A, Mathevet P. Laparoscopic vaginal radical trachelectomy. Cancer. 2000;88:1877–82.\nWalker JL, Piedmonte MR, Spirtos NM, Eisenkop SM, Schlaerth JB, Mannel RS, Spiegel G, Barakat R, Pearl ML, Sharma SK. Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: gynecologic oncology group study LAP2. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:5331–6.\nLucidi A, Chiantera V, Gallotta V, Ercoli A, Scambia G, Fagotti A. Role of robotic surgery in ovarian malignancy. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2017;45:74–82.\nMagrina JF, Zanagnolo V, Noble BN, Kho RM, Magtibay P. Robotic approach for ovarian cancer: perioperative and survival results and comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy. Gynecol Oncol. 2011;121:100–5.\nGallotta V, Cicero C, Conte C, Vizzielli G, Petrillo M, Fagotti A, Chiantera V, Costantini B, Scambia G, Ferrandina G. Robotic versus laparoscopic staging for early ovarian cancer: a case-matched control study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017;24:293–8.\nNezhat FR, Finger TN, Vetere P, Radjabi AR, Vega M, Averbuch L, Khalil S, Altinbas SK, Lax D. Comparison of perioperative outcomes and complication rates between conventional versus robotic-assisted laparoscopy in the evaluation and management of early, advanced, and recurrent stage ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2014;24:600–7.\nBush SH, Apte SM. Robotic-assisted surgery in gynecological oncology. Cancer Control. 2015;22:307–13.\nMinig L, Iserte PP, Zorrero C, Zanagnolo V. Robotic surgery in women with ovarian cancer: surgical technique and evidence of clinical outcomes. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016;23:309–16.\nIavazzo C, Gkegkes ID. Port-site metastases in patients with gynecological cancer after robot-assisted operations. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015;292:263–9.\nSeror J, Bats A-S, Bensaïd C, Douay-Hauser N, Ngo C, Lécuru F. Risk of port-site metastases in pelvic cancers after robotic surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015;41:599–603.\nMolpus KL, Wedergren JS, Carlson MA. Robotically assisted endoscopic ovarian transposition. JSLS. 2003;7:59–62.\nBaiocchi G, Vieira M, Moretti-Marques R, Mantoan H, Faloppa C, Damasceno RCF, Paula SOC, Tsunoda AT, Ribeiro R. Uterine transposition for gynecological cancers. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2021;31:442–6.\nOdetto D, Saadi JM, Chacon CB, Wernicke A, Ribeiro R. Uterine transposition after radical trachelectomy. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2021;31:1374–9.\nMarques RM, Tsunoda AT, Dias RS, Pimenta JM, Linhares JC, Ribeiro R. Robotic uterine transposition for a cervical cancer patient with pelvic micrometastases after conization and pelvic lymphadenectomy. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020;30:898–9.\nCorinti M, Ramos GGF, Bezerra VA, Barison GA, Moretti-Marques R, Vieira Gomes MT. Robotic-assisted laparoscopy for abdominal cerclage and correction of amniotic fistula. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021;28:S139.\nBarmat L, Glaser G, Davis G, Craparo F. Da Vinci-assisted abdominal cerclage. Fertil Steril. 2007;88:1437.e1–3.\nAuthor information\nAuthors and Affiliations\nEditor information\nEditors and Affiliations\nRights and permissions\nCopyright information\n© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG\nAbout this chapter\nCite this chapter\nMoretti-Marques, R., Corinti, M., Alvarenga-Bezerra, V., Martins, L.M., Gomes, M.T.V. (2023). Robotic Devices in Gynecology. In: Manzano, J.P., Ferreira, L.M. (eds) Robotic Surgery Devices in Surgical Specialties. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35102-0_13\nDownload citation\nDOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35102-0_13\nPublished:\nPublisher Name: Springer, Cham\nPrint ISBN: 978-3-031-35101-3\nOnline ISBN: 978-3-031-35102-0\neBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)","source_license":"CC0","license_restricted":false}