{"paper_id":"c6f2944d-cf0d-4d3b-953f-c940da805a80","body_text":"Endometriosis is defined as the presence of functional ectopic endometrial tissue outside the lining of the uterine cavity. It affects 4–17% of women in the reproductive age  [1] . Endometriosis affecting the gastrointestinal tract has been reported in 3–37% of menstruating women. It is seen in the recto-sigmoid, caecum, small bowel and the Appendix in decreasing order of frequency. Involvement of the ileum is quite rare and it causing small bowel obstruction is highly uncommon  [2] ,  [3] ,  [4] . Only few case reports have been reported so far, all requiring emergency surgery. However, laparoscopic management of such disease involving a terminal ileal stricture with appendicular involvement causing subacute partial mechanical obstruction has not been reported to the best of our knowledge.\nWe report one such case of small bowel obstruction that was clinic-radiologically diagnosed as possible Crohn’s disease but was histopathologically found to be due to endometriosis. We also highlight that cyclical abdominal pain with increasing intensity may hint towards endometriosis in a menstruating patient as a cause of small bowel obstruction.\n\nA 44 year old lady presented with severe generalized abdominal pain since two days along with multiple episodes of non-projectile, non-bilious vomiting and diarrhea. She had been admitted in another institution for similar complaints twice in the past month. On both occasions, she was managed conservatively for gastroenteritis with bowel rest and antibiotics. She complained of abdominal pain during every menstruation since six months that reduced with oral analgesics. However, the intensity of pain would increase with every cycle and since two months; she also experienced associated diarrhea and tenesmus. She was not on any contraceptive pills. She had undergone a caesarean section ten years ago. She was otherwise stable, her abdomen was soft with diffuse tenderness and bowel sounds were present. Her abdominal radiograph showed small bowel obstruction with faecal loading in the ascending colon. Computed Tomography (CT) revealed a concentric infective/inflammatory thickening of the distal ileum with significant luminal narrowing of the ileocaecal junction and terminal short segment of ileum with proximal ileal dilatation. No complete mechanical obstruction was seen. Mild edematous thickening of the bowel loops with prominent vasa recta, mild surrounding fat stranding and inter bowel fluid ( Fig. 1 ). The findings were suggestive of a subacute partial small bowel obstruction probably due to Crohn’s disease. The colonoscopy showed a tight short ileal stricture just inside the ileocaecal junction. Balloon dilatation was attempted. The narrowing recurred as soon as the balloon was withdrawn, hence it failed ( Fig. 2 ). The patient was managed conservatively but she continued to be symptomatic. Three days later, a colonoscopy was repeated and this time dilatation was done upto 15 mm. Submucosal hemorrhages were seen in the colon with ileocaecal ulceration. A differential diagnosis of tuberculosis was also considered. Despite the dilatation, her symptoms did not subside and the patient was taken for a diagnostic laparoscopy. Intraoperatively, a distal ileal stricture with multiple enlarged lymph nodes were seen. A lump was seen at the tip of the appendix, however the base appeared normal ( Fig. 3 ). No other abnormality was found. A laparoscopic right hemicolectomy was done. Postoperatively, the patient recuperated well and was gradually put on diet. The specimen grossly showed a dilated ileal segment, with the stricture being 2.5 cm in length. Pathologically, the ileum showed multiple endometritic foci with fibroblastic proliferation with a secondary stricture. The Appendix also showed multiple endometriotic foci. The immunohistochemistry (IHC) studies showed the glands to be positive for estrogen, progesterone receptors and vimentin. The stroma was positive for CD10 and vimentin. This confirmed the endometrial origin. No mucosal involvement was seen ( Fig. 4 ). However, the caecum and ascending colon were free from endometriosis. Thirty lymph nodes were resected, all of which showed reactive inflammatory changes. The patient was discharged after a week on full diet. She is on regular follow-up with no cyclical complaints and is not on any hormonal therapy.\n\nThe etiology of endometriosis remains unknown. It was first described in the sigmoid colon by Sampson in 1921  [5] . He popularized the theory of retrograde menstruation causing implantation and growth on the serosal surface of abdominal and pelvic organs  [6] . The Minh’s theory implied it to occur due to metaplastic transformation of pleuripotent peritoneal mesothelium. Donnez et al., attributed it to metaplasia in the mullerian remnants  [7] . Recently, a ‘neurological hypothesis’ implies that the lesions infiltrate the large bowel wall along the nerves distant from the primary lesion  [8] . A variety of genetic alterations and unknown environmental factors contribute to the disease  [9] .\nEndometriotic sites may be intra-peritoneal or extra-peritoneal. The intra-peritoneal sites include ovaries (30%), utero-sacral and large ligaments (18–24%), fallopian tubes (20%), pelvic peritoneum, pouch of Douglas, and gastrointestinal (GI) tract whereas the latter affect cervical portion (0.5%), vagina and recto-vaginal septum, round ligament and inguinal hernia sac (0.3–0.6%), navel (1%), abdominal scars after gynecological surgery (1.5%) and caesarian section (0.5%). Extra abdominal involvement is extremely rare  [3] ,  [4] ,  [10] ,  [11] . Our patient not only had the rare ileal involvement, but also the Appendix showed endometriotic deposits. Such a dual involvement has not been reported so far.\nClinically, symptoms of endometriosis are often non specific leading to the diagnostic dilemma  [12] . Gastrointestinal endometriosis present with unsettling episodes of abdominal pain, abdominal distention, tenesmus, constipation and diarrhea  [11] . The true incidence of endometriosis causing bowel obstruction is unknown  [13] . Symptoms are generally cyclical but may be continuous with progression of the disease. This may point towards the rare pathology causing obstruction.\nThe preoperative diagnosis remains elusive due to clinical similarities to the multiple other causes of small bowel obstruction namely inflammatory bowel disease, irritable bowel syndrome, infectious and ischaemic colitis and malignancy. Intestinal endometriosis can mimic adenocarcinoma with local invasion and rapid growth  [14] .\nRadiological imaging may be inconclusive. Since the disease does not involve the mucosa, endoscopy and barium enema is not helpful  [15] . However Magnetic Resonance Imaging seems to have a higher sensitivity  [16] ,  [17] . Laparoscopy is considered gold standard. The diagnosis can be confirmed only on histology.\nSmall bowel endometriosis is seen only in bowel serosa and deposits are usually not larger than 2 cm in size. The mucosa is not involved probably due to poor nerve supply. Patchy ‘grey glistening’ lesions are seen  [17] . Lymph nodal involvement has also been reported attributing to lymphatic dissemination from the intestinal endometriotic foci  [18] ,  [19]\nGastrointestinal endometriosis is usually found as an incidental finding on laparotomy. Asymptomatic and mildly symptomatic cases may be treated using hormonal treatment. However, acute obstructive cases may be dealt with surgery  [11] . Suspicion of malignancy may also warrant a radical resection.\nThe commonest site of gastrointestinal endometriosis is the rectosigmoid. Isolated involvement of the ileum has also been reported in 1–7%. The disease causing obstruction is rare, less than 1%  [20] . Dual involvement of the terminal ileum and the Appendix is extremely rare. The incidence of intestinal resection for bowel obstruction is 0.7%  [20] . Very few reports describe laparoscopic management of the disease causing obstruction.\nThe management includes hormonal therapy and surgery. The former with danazol or gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogs may be used in patients without obstruction. However, resection of the involved bowel remains the choice of treatment for complicated or unresolved cases.\nTable 1  summarizes similar cases that have been reported so far. Most cases presented with either partial or complete small bowel obstruction attributed to other causes. Most underwent emergent surgery. Hormonal therapy is not popular in acute cases of obstruction.\nOur case highlights the progressive nature of the disease. Our patient earlier had pain only during menstruation which later progressed to repeated episodes of crampy pain with diarrhea and tenesmus. Despite, endoscopic balloon dilatation of the ileal stricture, the symptoms continued. The tight terminal ileal stricture was eventually managed by laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. Histology confirmed the diagnosis.\n\nEndometriosis as a cause of small bowel obstruction with appendicular involment remains a rare entity. A preoperative diagnosis is difficult due to lack of pathognomic clinical and radiological findings. However, a high index of suspicion is required in women in the reproductive age group. Cyclical symptoms of increasing intensity may hint towards the diagnosis.","source_license":"CC0","license_restricted":false}