{"paper_id":"c04b23b0-e036-47ff-93c4-805f0da1b569","body_text":"Abstract\nEndometriosis is a benign disease characterized by endometrial glands and stroma outside the endometrial cavity. We reported two cases of endometriosis of the abdominal wall, with subcutaneous and intramuscular localization, that became symptomatic a few years after a cesarean intervention. These cases have a clinical pattern quite similar to cutaneous endometriosis, but they are more difficult to diagnose through physical examination because they are barely palpable. In this sense, coupled with suggestive symptoms, ultrasound examination can confirm the clinical suspicion of endometriosis without the use of computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging.\nSimilar content being viewed by others\nReferences\nRokitansky K (1860) U ¨ ber Uterusdru ¨sen-Neubildung. Z Gesellschaft Aerzte (Wien) 16:577–581\nFuldeore MJ, Soliman AM (2017) Prevalence and symptomatic burden of diagnosed endometriosis in the United States: national estimates from a cross-sectional survey of 59,411 women. Gynecol Obstet Invest 82:453–461\nDavis AC, Goldberg JM (2017) Extrapelvic endometriosis. Semin Reprod Med 35:98–101\nBozkurt M, Çil AS, Bozkurt DK (2014) Intramuscular abdominal wall endometriosis treated by ultrasound-guided ethanol injection. Clin Med Res 12:160–165\nVan den Bosch T, Van Schoubroeck D (2018) Ultrasound diagnosis of endometriosis and adenomyosis: state of the art. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 51:16–24\nCocco G, Boccatonda A, D’Ardes D et al (2018) Mantle cell lymphoma: from ultrasound examination to histological diagnosis. J Ultrasound 21:339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-018-0318-1\nAlnafisah F, Dawa SK, Alalfy S (2018) Skin endometriosis at the caesarean section scar: a case report and review of the literature. Cureus 10:e2063\nMistrangelo M, Gilbo N, Cassoni P et al (2014) Surgical scar endometriosis. Surg Today 44:767–772\nBurghaus S, Hildebrandt T, Fahlbusch C et al (2019) Standards used by a clinical and scientific endometriosis center for the diagnosis and therapy of patients with endometriosis. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 79:487–497\nBurney RO, Giudice LC (2012) Pathogenesis and pathophysiology of endometriosis. Fertil Steril 98:511–519\nWang PH, Juang CM, Chao HT et al (2003) Wound endometriosis: risk factor evaluation and treatment. J Chin Med Assoc 66:113–119\nOosterlynck DJ, Cornillie FJ, Waer M, Vandeputte M, Koninckx PR (1991) Women with endometriosis show a defect in natural killer activity resulting in a decreased cytotoxicity to autologous endometrium. Fertil Steril 56:45–51\nBetrán AP, Ye J, Moller AB et al (2016) The increasing trend in caesarean section rates: global, regional and national estimates: 1990–2014. PLoS ONE 11:e0148343\nZhao Y, Zhang J, Zamora J et al (2017) Increases in caesarean delivery rates and change of perinatal outcomes in low- and middle-income countries: a hospital-level analysis of two WHO surveys. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 31:251–262\nWicherek L, Klimek M, Skret-Magierlo J et al (2007) The obstetrical history in patients with Pfannenstiel scar endometriomas—an analysis of 81 patients. Gynecol Obstet Invest 63:107–113\nHufnagel D, Li F, Cosar E et al (2015) The role of stem cells in the etiology and pathophysiology of endometriosis. Semin Reprod Med 33:333–340\nHirsch M, Begum MR, Paniz É et al (2018) Diagnosis and management of endometriosis: a systematic review of international and national guidelines. BJOG 125:556–564\nKavoussi SK, Lim CS, Skinner BD et al (2016) New paradigms in the diagnosis and management of endometriosis. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 28:267–276\nGuerriero S, Saba L, Pascual MA et al (2018) Transvaginal ultrasound vs. magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing deep infiltrating endometriosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 51:586–595\nBatur A, Yavuz A, Ozgokce M et al (2016) The utility of ultrasound elastography in differentiation of endometriomas and hemorrhagic ovarian cysts. J Med Ultrason 43:395–400\nFawzy M, Amer T (2015) Efficacy of transabdominal sonoelastography in the diagnosis of caesarean section scar endometrioma: a pilot study. J Obstet Gynaecol 35:832–834\nSavelli L, Manuzzi L, Di Donato N et al (2012) Endometriosis of the abdominal wall: ultrasonographic and Doppler characteristics. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 39:336–340\nAuthor information\nAuthors and Affiliations\nCorresponding author\nEthics declarations\nConflict of interest\nAuthors declare no conflicts of interest.\nResearch involving human participants and/or animals\nNot applicable.\nInformed consent\nWritten informed consent was obtained by both patients.\nAdditional information\nPublisher's Note\nSpringer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.\nRights and permissions\nAbout this article\nCite this article\nCocco, G., Ricci, V., Boccatonda, A. et al. Focused ultrasound for the diagnosis of non-palpable endometriotic lesions of the abdominal wall: a not-uncommon surgical complication. J Ultrasound 23, 183–187 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-019-00425-x\nReceived:\nAccepted:\nPublished:\nVersion of record:\nIssue date:\nDOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-019-00425-x","source_license":"CC0","license_restricted":false}