{"paper_id":"bd3c6724-dadc-4eb0-8573-cc90dbe01fa8","body_text":"EN\nValidity and Reliability of The Turkish Version of The Pelvic Pain Impact Questionnaire\nAbstract\nIntroduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Turkish translation of the Pelvic Pain Impact Questionnaire(PPIQ-T).\nMaterial and Methods: This study was conducted with 110 female patients (mean age of 43.67±11.71years), who were being treated as inpatients or outpatients in the Obstetrics and Gynecology Department. Necessary permission for PPIQ was obtained and translation procedures were applied in terms of cultural adaptation. Test-retest and internal consistency were used for reliability. The correlation between the McGill Pain Instrument(MPQ) and the Short Form-36(SF-36) was looked at to determine the construct validity of the questionnaire. Additionally, exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were used to test the factorial validity of the PPIQ.\nResults: Test-retest reliability's intraclass correlation coefficient(ICC) was 0.95, while the Cronbach alpha value was 0.92. Significant correlation was determined between PPIQ and SF-36 questionnaires (r= 0.62-0.78, p<0.001), and MPQ (r=0.85, p<0.001). The KMO coefficient was 0.87, according to exploratory factor analysis (EFA). Confirmatory Factor Analysis(CFA) values were found Chi-Square as 31.142, df as 18, RMSEA as 0.08, and p<0.05.\nConclusion: The study's results indicated that the PPIQ-T can be utilized to evaluate patients with CPP in a variety of contexts and for treatment planning.\nKeywords\nReferences\n- 1. Engeler D et al. EAU guidelines on chronic pelvic pain. 2022. https://uroweb.org/individual-guidelines/non-oncology-guidelines/\n- 2. Ahangari A. Prevalence of chronic pelvic pain among women: an updated review. Pain physician 2014;17(2):E141-147.\n- 3. Vincent K. Chronic pelvic pain in women. Postgrad Med J 2009;85(999):24-29.\n- 4. Howard HS. Sexual adjustment counseling for women with chronic pelvic pain. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2012;41(5):692-702.\n- 5. Fall M, Baranowski AP, Elneil S, Engeler D, Hughes J, Messelink EJ et al. EAU guidelines on chronic pelvic pain. Eur Urol 2010;57(1):35-48.\n- 6. Dick ML. Chronic pelvic pain in women: assessment and management. Aust Fam Physician 2004;33(12):971-976.\n- 7. Sewell M, Churilov L, Mooney S, Ma T, Maher P & Grover SR. Chronic pelvic pain–pain catastrophizing, pelvic pain and quality of life. Scand J Pain 2018;18(3):441-448.\n- 8. Cox L, Ayers S, Mala K, Penny J. Chronic pelvic pain and quality of life after laparoscopy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2007;132:214–219.\nDetails\nPrimary Language\nEnglish\nSubjects\nHealth Care Administration\nJournal Section\nResearch Article\nPublication Date\nMay 31, 2023\nSubmission Date\nSeptember 22, 2022\nAcceptance Date\nMarch 6, 2023\nPublished in Issue\nYear 2023 Volume: 7 Number: 2\nAPA\nKurt, T. K., Taşpınar, B., & Taspinar, F. (2023). Validity and Reliability of The Turkish Version of The Pelvic Pain Impact Questionnaire. Journal of Basic and Clinical Health Sciences, 7(2), 705-712. https://doi.org/10.30621/jbachs.1178880\nAMA\n1.Kurt TK, Taşpınar B, Taspinar F. Validity and Reliability of The Turkish Version of The Pelvic Pain Impact Questionnaire. JBACHS. 2023;7(2):705-712. doi:10.30621/jbachs.1178880\nChicago\nKurt, Tuğçe Keziban, Betül Taşpınar, and Ferruh Taspinar. 2023. “Validity and Reliability of The Turkish Version of The Pelvic Pain Impact Questionnaire”. Journal of Basic and Clinical Health Sciences 7 (2): 705-12. https://doi.org/10.30621/jbachs.1178880.\nEndNote\nKurt TK, Taşpınar B, Taspinar F (May 1, 2023) Validity and Reliability of The Turkish Version of The Pelvic Pain Impact Questionnaire. Journal of Basic and Clinical Health Sciences 7 2 705–712.\nIEEE\n[1]T. K. Kurt, B. Taşpınar, and F. Taspinar, “Validity and Reliability of The Turkish Version of The Pelvic Pain Impact Questionnaire”, JBACHS, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 705–712, May 2023, doi: 10.30621/jbachs.1178880.\nISNAD\nKurt, Tuğçe Keziban - Taşpınar, Betül - Taspinar, Ferruh. “Validity and Reliability of The Turkish Version of The Pelvic Pain Impact Questionnaire”. Journal of Basic and Clinical Health Sciences 7/2 (May 1, 2023): 705-712. https://doi.org/10.30621/jbachs.1178880.\nJAMA\n1.Kurt TK, Taşpınar B, Taspinar F. Validity and Reliability of The Turkish Version of The Pelvic Pain Impact Questionnaire. JBACHS. 2023;7:705–712.\nMLA\nKurt, Tuğçe Keziban, et al. “Validity and Reliability of The Turkish Version of The Pelvic Pain Impact Questionnaire”. Journal of Basic and Clinical Health Sciences, vol. 7, no. 2, May 2023, pp. 705-12, doi:10.30621/jbachs.1178880.\nVancouver\n1.Tuğçe Keziban Kurt, Betül Taşpınar, Ferruh Taspinar. Validity and Reliability of The Turkish Version of The Pelvic Pain Impact Questionnaire. JBACHS. 2023 May 1;7(2):705-12. doi:10.30621/jbachs.1178880\nCited By\nThe Association Between Urinary Incontinence With Pelvic Pain and Sensory‐Motor Function in Older Women With Stroke\nNeurourology and Urodynamics\nhttps://doi.org/10.1002/nau.25613Pelvic pain, sexual distress and satisfaction: cross-sectional study\nThe Journal of Sexual Medicine\nhttps://doi.org/10.1093/jsxmed/qdaf042","source_license":"CC0","license_restricted":false}