{"paper_id":"b1c99cf6-ba61-401a-b07f-085e1038b14e","body_text":"Vol.:(0123456789)1 3\nh\nttps://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-022-00950-x\nCORRECTION\nCorrection to: Dysregulation of miR‑202‑3p Affects Migration \nand Invasion of Endometrial Stromal Cells in Endometriosis \nvia Targeting ROCK1\nMing Zhang1,2,3 · Yuanzhen Zhang1,2,3,4 · Li Li1 · Ling Ma1 · Chun Zhou1\n \n© Society for Reproductive Investigation 2022\nCorrection to: Reproductive Sciences (2020) 27:731–742\nhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-019-00079-4\nThe original article can be found online at https:// doi. or g/ 10. 1007/ \ns43032- 019- 00079-4\n.\n * Ming Zhang \n whu_mz@163.com\n Yuanzhen Zhang \n zhangyuanzhen@whu.edu.cn\n Li Li \n activity13@163.com\n Ling Ma \n 810323923@qq.com\n Chun Zhou \n zcxn26@qq.com\n1 Reproductive Medicine Center, Zhongnan Hospital, Wuhan \nU\nniversity, No.169 East Lake Road, Wuhan 430071, Hubei, \nChina\n2 Hubei Clinical Resear ch Center for Prenatal Diagnosis \nand Birth Health, Wuhan 430071, Hubei Province, \nPeople’s Republic of China\n3 Hubei Provincial Key Laboratory of Developmentally \nOr\niginated Disease, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430071, \nHubei Province, People’s Republic of China\n4 Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Zhongnan Hospital, \nW\nuhan University, Wuhan 430071, Hubei Province, \nPeople’s Republic of China\nIn the original article, the representative images for wound-\nhealing results of the miR-202-3p inhibitors experiments at \n0 h and 12 h in Fig. 2B were erroneously selected when the \nauthors compiled the pictures. When the errors were noticed, \nthe authors checked the original data and provided the cor -\nrect pictures. It should be emphasized that the inadvertent \nerrors have no material impact on the conclusions of this \narticle. Consequently, the authors ask for a replacement of \nthe Fig. 2 in the original article with the corrected version \nof Fig. 2 as shown here. The authors all agree to this Cor -\nrection, and would like to apologize for any inconvenience \ncaused to the readers by these changes.\nPublished online: 25 April 2022\nReproductive Sciences (2022) 29:1963–1964\n\n1 3\nFig. 2  Effects of miR-202-3p \non the viability, migration and \ninvasion of ESCs. A, miR-\n202-3p was overexpressed or \nsuppressed in ESCs by specific \nmimics or inhibitors transfec-\ntion. Relative cell viability was \nassessed by MTT assay. *, mim-\nics v.s. mimics NC, P < 0.05; \n#, inhibitors v.s. inhibitors NC, \nP < 0.05. B, Wound-healing \nassay was used to evaluate ESCs \nmigratory capacity after miR-\n202-3p mimics or inhibitors \ntransfection. The wound width \nwas observed under a light \nmicroscope (× 100) and quanti-\nfied at the indicated time points \n(0, 12 and 24 h). *, P < 0.05 \nv.s. 0 h; **, P < 0.01 v.s. 0 h. C, \nInvasion ability of ESCs was \ndetermined using Transwell \ninvasion assay. **, mimics \nv.s. mimics NC, P < 0.01; ##, \ninhibitors v.s. inhibitors NC, \nP < 0.01. Control, normal \ncomplete medium; mimics NC, \nmimics negative control; mim-\nics, miR-202-3p mimics; inh. \nNC, inhibitors negative control; \ninhibitors, LNA miR-202-3p \ninhibitors\n1964 Reproductive Sciences  (2022) 29:1963–1964","source_license":"CC0","license_restricted":false}