{"paper_id":"b00e4d75-2523-4647-87a6-cf7e850b67e9","body_text":"Comparison of ovarian reserve after laparoscopic cystectomy in patients with ovarian endometriosis differ in cyst size: A systematic review and meta-analysis\nWeihe Liu and Tingting Zhao were first two authors are joint first authors.\nAbstract\nBackground\nWhether cyst size affects ovarian reserve before and after surgery remains controversial.\nObjective\nThe objective of this study is to determine whether cyst size causes differences in pre- and post-ovarian reserve impairment among patients with endometrioma.\nSearch Strategy\nPubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure were searched from inception to October 13, 2023.\nSelection Criteria\nWe included prospective studies comparing the ovarian reserve parameters of patients with endometrioma preoperatively and at different time points postoperatively between large and small groups, determined by self-defined cut-off values in eligible studies.\nData Collection and Analysis\nBias was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Standardized mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used for outcome measures.\nMain Outcome Measure(s)\nThe main outcome measures are serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) and antral follicle count (AFC) preoperatively and at different time points postoperatively (primary and secondary aims).\nMain Results\nSeven trials (603 participants) were included, all of which qualified for meta-analysis. Irrespective of the cut-off values, the SMD showed that the serum AMH level was significantly lower in large groups at 1 month postoperatively (SMD = −0.515 ng/mL, 95% CI [−0.858, −0.172], P = 0.003, = 44.3%). Subgroup analyses indicated that when the cut-off values were limited to 5 cm in diameter, the AMH levels were significantly lower in large groups (SMD = −0.822 ng/mL, 95% CI [−1.605, −0.039], P = 0.040, = 58.3%) 1 month after the surgery, and when cut-off values were limited to 7 cm, even at 3 months postoperatively, the serum AMH levels of patients with large endometrioma were still significantly lower than those with small endometrioma (SMD = −0.531 ng/mL, 95% CI [−0.818, −0.245], P = 0.000, = 0.0%). However, when cut-off values were not limited, the serum AMH levels did not differ significantly (P > 0.05) between the groups preoperatively and at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Additionally, there were no significant differences (P > 0.05) in the AFC between the groups preoperatively and 1 month postoperatively.\nConclusion\nAMH in patients with different endometrioma sizes recovered to the same level at 6 months postoperatively. Our study provides guidance for the clinical prognostic assessment of patients with large endometriomas after laparoscopic cystectomy.\nSystematic review registration: CRD42023481967(PROSPERO).\nCONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT\nThe authors report no conflict of interest.\nDATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT\nData is available from the authors upon reasonable request.","source_license":"public-domain-us","license_restricted":false}