{"paper_id":"af74a738-5fc1-4e64-807c-feb57f142cbf","body_text":"Abstract\nPurpose\nTo evaluate the feasibility, safety and perioperative outcome of single-incision laparoscopic hysterectomy (SILH) using conventional laparoscopic instruments for treatment of patients with symptomatic leiomyoma and/or adenomyosis.\nMethods\nA retrospective study (Canadian Task Force Classification II-2) was carried out at a tertiary referral university hospital from August 2009 to January 2010. Women diagnosed with leiomyoma/adenomyosis and scheduled to undergo SILH were enrolled. The criteria included uterine size ≤16 weeks’ gestation on pelvic examination, no suspected malignancy on sonography, normal cytology and contraindications for vaginal hysterectomy. The medical records of all consecutive patients undergoing SILH were reviewed. The main outcome measurements were the feasibility and safety of SILH in terms of conversion rate, body mass index (BMI), uterine weight, operative time, estimated blood loss, drop in hemoglobin level and complications.\nResults\nEleven consecutive patients diagnosed with leiomyoma (10) and adenomyosis (1) underwent SILH successfully during the study period, without conversion or requirement of any extra port. The mean age and BMI of the patients were 47.4 ± 4.27 years and 25.2 ± 4.61 kg/m2, respectively. The average clinical uterine size and uterine weight were 13.2 ± 2.48 weeks’ gestation and 281.6 ± 152.89 g, respectively. The mean operative time was 163.3 ± 20.46 min. The mean estimated blood loss and drop in hemoglobin level were 114.5 ± 48.65 ml and 0.33 ± 0.62 g/dl, respectively. No intra-operative complication occurred. Postoperative febrile morbidity was found in two patients. The follow-up at 14 days and 6 weeks postoperatively was uneventful.\nConclusions\nSILH using conventional laparoscopic instrumentation might be a feasible and safe alternative to standard multiple incision laparoscopic hysterectomy in selected patients with symptomatic benign uterine tumor. The potential advantages of our technique are: it is simple and cost-effective, due to the use of conventional, user-friendly laparoscopic instruments. Additional studies on SILH are needed to demonstrate its safety, define selective criteria and determine any benefits over conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy.\nSimilar content being viewed by others\nReferences\nRomanelli JR, Earle DB (2009) Single-port laparoscopic surgery: an overview. Surg Endosc 23:1419–1427\nCanes D, Desai MM, Aron M, Haber GP, Goel RK, Stein RJ, Kaouk JH, Gill IS (2008) Transumbilical single-port surgery: evolution and current status. Eur Urol 54:1020–1029\nWheeless CR Jr (1969) A rapid, inexpensive and effective method of surgical sterilization by laparoscopy. J Reprod Med 3:65–69\nPelosi MA, Pelosi MA III (1991) Laparoscopic hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy using a single umbilical puncture. N J Med 88:721–726\nHernandez JM, Morton CA, Ross S, Albrink M, Rosemurgy AS (2009) Laparoendoscopic single site cholecystectomy: the first 100 patients. Am Surg 75:681–685\nKaouk JH, Haber GP, Goel RK, Desai MM, Aron M, Rackley RR, Moore C, Gill IS (2008) Single-port laparoscopic surgery in urology: initial experience. Urology 71:3–6\nLaw WL, Fan JK, Poon JT (2010) Single-incision laparoscopic colectomy: early experience. Dis Colon Rectum 53:284–288\nTacchino RM, Greco F, Matera D (2010) Laparoscopic gastric banding without visible scar: a short series with intraumbilical SILS. Obes Surg 20:236–239\nFader AN, Escobar PF (2009) Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) in gynecologic oncology: technique and initial report. Gynecol Oncol 114:157–161\nFagotti A, Fanfani F, Marocco F, Rossitto C, Gallotta V, Scambia G (2009) Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) for ovarian cyst enucleation: report of first 3 cases. Fertil Steril 92:1168.e13–1168.e16\nFanfani F, Fagotti A, Scambia G (2009) Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery for total hysterectomy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 109:76–77\nJung YW, Kim YT, Lee DW, Hwang YI, Nam EJ, Kim JH, Kim SW (2010) The feasibility of scarless single-port transumbilical total laparoscopic hysterectomy: initial clinical experience. Surg Endosc 24:1686–1692\nKim TJ, Lee YY, Kim MJ, Kim CJ, Kang H, Choi CH, Lee JW, Kim BG, Bae DS (2009) Single port access laparoscopic adnexal surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 16:612–615\nLangebrekke A, Qvigstad E (2009) Total laparoscopic hysterectomy with single-port access without vaginal surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 16:609–611\nMereu L, Angioni S, Melis GB, Mencaglia L (2010) Single access laparoscopy for adnexal pathologies using a novel reusable port and curved instruments. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 109:78–80\nYoon G, Kim TJ, Lee YY, Kim CJ, Choi CH, Lee JW, Kim BG, Bae DS (2009) Single-port access subtotal hysterectomy with transcervical morcellation: a pilot study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 17:78–81\nPhongnarisorn C, Srisomboon J (2007) Surgical morbidity associated with total laparoscopic hysterectomy in women with prior diagnostic excision of the cervix. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 33:519–523\nLee YY, Kim TJ, Kim CJ, Kang H, Choi CH, Lee JW, Kim BG, Lee JH, Bae DS (2009) Single-port access laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a novel method with a wound retractor and a glove. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 16:450–453\nBonilla DJ, Mains L, Whitaker R, Crawford B, Finan M, Magnus M (2007) Uterine weight as a predictor of morbidity after a benign abdominal and total laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Reprod Med 52:490–498\nCondous G, Bignardi T, Alhamdan D, Van CB, Van HS, Timmerman D, Lam A (2009) What determines the need to morcellate the uterus during total laparoscopic hysterectomy? J Minim Invasive Gynecol 16:52–55\nConflict of interest\nNone.\nAuthor information\nAuthors and Affiliations\nCorresponding author\nRights and permissions\nAbout this article\nCite this article\nPhongnarisorn, C., Chinthakanan, O. Transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic hysterectomy with conventional laparoscopic instruments in patients with symptomatic leiomyoma and/or adenomyosis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 284, 893–900 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-010-1770-0\nReceived:\nAccepted:\nPublished:\nIssue date:\nDOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-010-1770-0","source_license":"CC0","license_restricted":false}