{"paper_id":"ab429a24-31bb-4ede-add0-ea5afeccab77","body_text":"Embryonal Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is a rare tumor arising from the embryonal mesenchyme and is primarily a childhood and adolescent malignancy. It is one of the most common childhood soft tissue sarcomas. 1  It accounts for 4 to 6% of all malignancies in this age group, while in adults, it comprises less than 1% of all malignancies. 1 , 2  RMS commonly affects the head and neck region, while the female genital tract remains the second most common presentation site. Other affected sites include the extremities, the trunk, and the retroperitoneum, apart from other uncommon sites reported in the literature, such as the thorax, gastrointestinal tract (GIT), anus, and perianal regions. 3  In the female genital tract, the vagina is the most commonly affected site, and embryonal RMS commonly presents as botryoid RMS in the vagina. The uterine cervix is an uncommon site for the development of embryonal RMS, and this tumor comprises 0.2% of the malignant tumors of the uterus affecting adult females. The ratio of incidence of cervical primary embryonal RMS compared to its vaginal counterpart is 1:5, while the survival rates are known to be 60% and 90%, respectively. 3 , 4  The diagnosis of this variant rests primarily upon clinical suspicion clubbed with appropriate histopathological and immunohistochemical evaluation. Since these tumors are highly infrequent among adults, they can be easily missed or misdiagnosed in the absence of a green eye.\nThe classification of rhabdomyosarcoma subtypes is critical in terms of prognosis and therapeutic definition. Generally, alveolar and pleomorphic subtypes have a poor prognosis, but the embryonal subtype has a relatively better prognosis. Morphological and molecular characteristics will be discussed to support risk stratification and therapeutic choice. We present a case of an anaplastic variant of RMS presenting as a cervical polyp in a 36-year- old female\n\nA 36-year-old female presented to the Gynecology Out Patient Department (OPD) with chief complaints of dyspareunia and post-coital bleeding. The gynecological evaluation revealed the presence of a large cervical polyp arising from the endocervix, which bled on touch. She had no other significant co-morbidity and was worked up for the polyp’s surgical excision. Intraoperatively, disproportional bleeding followed the polyp’s removal.\nThe polyp measured 5x3cm and presented a blood-stained external surface. It was fully processed. The histological examination revealed a stromal tumor ( Figure 1 ) composed of marked cytological atypia with nuclear pleomorphism, high N:C ratio, and markedly pleomorphic cells with scant cytoplasm and bizarre nuclei, with the presence of binucleation and undifferentiated atypical blastemal cells with conspicuous nucleoli.\nBrisk mitosis was noted with 1-2 atypical mitotic figures per high-power field (1-2/HPF). A few strap cells were also present scattered within the tumor cells. The tumor cells encroached upon the blood vessels, but no frank vascular invasion was noted. Areas of hemorrhage and necrosis were also present. Atrophic endometrial glands were also found within the tumor.\nThe overall microscopy of the polyp connoted a diagnosis of a high-grade genitourinary stromal neoplasm with the differentials being (i) pleomorphic undifferentiated uterine sarcoma, (ii) high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma, (iii) dedifferentiated cervical leiomyosarcoma, and (iv) rhabdomyosarcoma.\nImmunohistochemical (IHC) evaluation revealed tumor cell reactivity to Vimentin, Desmin, Myo D1, and Myogenin but was non-reactive for SMA and CK7 ( Figure 2 ). The Ki 67 proliferative index was 50-60% in the most proliferative focus.\nThe final microscopy with IHC studies established a diagnosis of Embryonal RMS of the uterine cervix, an anaplastic variant.\nThe patient was referred to a higher oncology center for further evaluation and management. Her PET CT revealed a 3.9x4x3.3cm, non-FDG avid lesion involving the posterior lip and the body of the cervix ( Figure 3 ).\nSimilarly, the contrast-enhanced MRI (CE-MRI) scan concurred with the above findings by confirming the presence of an endocervical canal lesion having a lobulated appearance, extending into the posterior fornix and penetrating the posterior cervical myometrium. This lesion measured 28x59x47mm. However, no invasion into the uterus or the urinary bladder was noted.\nBased on the above radiological features, the patient underwent total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection (TAH+BSO+B/L PLND), and the excised specimens were evaluated histopathologically.\nGrossly, the uterus presented with an exophytic polypoidal growth measuring approximately 6x4x2.5cm, arising from the endocervical canal with unremarkable involvement of the remaining endometrial cavity ( Figure 4A  and  4B ). The endometrial thickness was 1.6 cm. The microscopy of the polypoidal mass concorded with the initial biopsy findings and the presence of a cambium layer, with tumor cells showing focal rhabdomyoblastic differentiation and brisk mitosis. Although IHC features were the same as on the initial biopsy, the Ki67 proliferation index of this tumor was slightly higher at 60-70% in most proliferative areas.\nThe final histopathological diagnosis of the TAH+BSO+B/L PLND specimen concluded to be cervical embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma, an anaplastic variant with no lymphovascular invasion (LVI) or perineural invasion (PNI) or extension into the myometrium or the adjacent Fallopian tubes or ovaries with the dissected lymph nodes being free of tumor.\nThe patient is currently undergoing chemoradiotherapy and is on regular follow-up.\n\nRMS is a highly malignant skeletal muscle neoplasm. Horn and Enterline 5  initially classified it into alveolar, embryonal, the botryoid variant of embryonal and pleomorphic RMS; however, in 2013, the WHO classification 6  of skeletal muscle tumors modified the RMS histologic classification, describing sclerosing RMS as a separate entity, and not a subtype of embryonal RMS. The current WHO classification subclassifies RMS into embryonal, alveolar, spindle cell/sclerosing, and pleomorphic variants and does not separate the botryoid subtype. 2 , 6 , 7  In recent years, anaplastic or pleomorphic and embryonal RMS have emerged as the two main subtypes of RMS based on the microscopic features of the cells distributed around a central area or cells resembling immature skeletal myoblasts. This distinction is supported by the recognition that the anaplastic variant is often associated with balanced chromosomal translocations involving chromosomes 2 or 1 and 13 (referred to here as t(2;13) and t(1;13)), originally detected by cytogenetics. However, a small but substantial fraction of patients with this variant do not harbor one of these translocations, and these tumors are biologically and clinically similar to embryonal RMS. 8  Additionally, pleomorphic RMS is a morphologically uncommon variant of RMS that typically occurs in adults. Like the embryonal variant, unifying molecular genetic aberrations in pleomorphic RMS are unclear. The spindle cell/sclerosing RMS variant is more common in children. The tumors in the head/neck region seem more likely to carry specific somatic mutations and have a poorer prognosis. 9\nEmbryonal RMS is the most common type and accounts for 60% of all rhabdomyosarcomas. 7  It is a malicious variant of RMS and arises from the embryonal mesenchyme. It accounts for 4-6% of all childhood malignancies. 7  It is further categorized into sarcoma botryoides and anaplastic variants. The anaplastic variant is an uncommon variant of embryonal RMS and comprises roughly 8-27% of all embryonal RMS. 10 , 11  It is primarily a childhood malignancy and is almost always associated with TP53 mutations and a poor prognostic outcome. 12  The 2008 and 2021 reports from Soft Tissue Sarcoma Committee for the Children’s Oncology Group mentioned that embryonal RMS most commonly presented in the 1 st  decade of life, with approximately 82% of these cases having  TP53  mutations. 10 , 11\nAlthough rhabdomyosarcoma is considered relatively common among children with vaginal sarcoma, embryonal cervical rhabdomyosarcoma is extremely rare and usually occurs in women in the second and third decades of life. 13  Approximately 1% of all adult malignancies are sarcomas, and rhabdomyosarcomas account for less than 5% of all adult sarcomas. 14  As per the literature review of this malignancy given by Connor and Disilvestro 12  in 2015, there have been less than 40 reported cases of cervical embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma in adult women in the last 50 years. Additionally, of all the malignancies affecting the uterine cervix, the incidence of RMS is reported to be about 0.4 to 1%. 15\nMost cervical RMS cases are known to occur sporadically, with no recognized predisposing factors; however, a small proportion of cases are also associated with genetic conditions. Li-Fraumeni cancer susceptibility syndrome, evident by a clustering of soft tissue malignancies (including sarcomas), has been discovered in a family to be caused by a heterozygous germline p53 mutation. 16  It has also recently been associated with constitutional mismatch repair-deficiency syndrome and dysplasia syndrome. Dehner et al. 14  in their study of 14 cases of cervical embryonal RMS, also found a link of embryonal RMS to the pleuropulmonary blastoma family of tumors with confirmed  DICER1  mutations.\nThe pathogenesis of embryonal RMS of the cervix remains unclear; however, several reports implicate germline mutations involving the  DICER1  gene. The  DICER1  gene codes for endoribonuclease, which has an important role in the biogenesis of microRNAs and the control of protein translation. 17  Apellaniz-Ruiz et al. 16  in their study of embryonal RMS and adenosarcomas of the gynecological tract, have observed that almost all cases of gynecologic embryonal RMS may harbor  DICER1  alterations. This pathological germline variation in  DICER1  may create a predisposition to hereditary cancer syndrome - DICER1 syndrome, characterized by developing multiple benign and malignant tumors. This presents a similarity with the study of Dehner et al. 14  where they linked the development of cervical embryonal RMS to the blastoma family of tumors with  DICER1  mutation. Additionally, inactivating mutations of the p53 tumor suppressor gene located on chromosome 17 have also been described. 17 , 18\nIn the cervix, embryonal RMS is known to predominantly present as a cervical polyp, commonly associated with bleeding, as was our patient’s presentation. The initial clue for diagnosing our case on gross evaluation was the size of the polyp and its gross appearance. Cervical RMS often presents as a large polyp with many myxoid areas. It may also present as multiple polyps. 2  Our case did present with a large polyp; however, its surface was blood-stained, so the presence of myxoid areas could not be ascertained grossly.\nThe clinical manifestations of cervical RMS include serosanguinous vaginal discharge and a polyp-like mass protruding through the vagina. 2  Our patient, similarly, presented with postcoital bleeding. Other clinical symptoms include amenorrhea or menorrhagia. 19  Advanced cases may present with cervical pain radiating to the back, bladder irritation, and tenesmus. Terminal stages of the malignancy give rise to anemia and cachexia and may even develop hydronephrosis. 2\nMicroscopically, it is characterized by hypocellular and hypercellular areas with a loose, myxoid stroma. Perivascular condensations of tumor cells in the less cellular regions are common. Marked pleomorphism is noted, along with abundant atypical mitosis and atypical rhabdomyoblasts. Immunohistochemistry reveals tumor cells’ reactivity to vimentin, desmin, actin, myoglobin, MyoD1, and myogenin. IHC is essential for a confirmatory diagnosis. 19 , 20\nHistopathologically, this tumor needs to be differentiated from other benign and malignant mimics such as cervical mesodermal polyp (pseudosarcoma botryoides), rhabdomyoma, cervical adenosarcoma, pleomorphic undifferentiated uterine sarcoma, high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma, and dedifferentiated cervical leiomyosarcoma.\nTables 1  and  2  differentiate embryonal RMS from its benign and malignant mimics, respectively.\nDue to uncommon occurrences of these tumors, there is limited literature evaluating optimal therapy. Hence, there is no uniform consensus on the management approach to these tumors. However, over the decades, there has been a paradigm shift in management strategies for cervical embryonal RMS. Although ultra-radical surgeries like pelvic exenteration were considered the treatment of choice in the late 1960s, outcomes were often unsatisfactory. In the 1970s, limited surgery with adjuvant chemotherapy and/or irradiation showed improved survival. Surgical aggressiveness has gradually reduced from mutilating exenterative procedures to simple local excisions. 48\nThe current management of cervical embryonal RMS depends primarily on the patient’s age. Since it is more common among younger females, conservative management to retain the genitourinary organs is the preferred modality. Other factors taken into account are the histologic subtype, size, site of origin, disease extent at presentation, and residual disease after treatment. Since cervical RMS is less aggressive than its vaginal counterpart, fertility-sparing options can be considered for managing the cervix’s early stage of embryonal RMS. The Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study Group (IRSG) states fertility-sparing surgery and chemotherapy as an appropriate treatment for patients with localized disease but not applicable for advanced-stage and metastatic disease. The primary principle for surgical management of cervical embryonal RMS is complete resection of the primary tumor with the surrounding margin of normal tissue. 7\nThe spectrum of surgical therapy now includes radical hysterectomy with or without lymphadenectomy, vaginectomy, cervicectomy, polypectomy, local excisions, and diathermy loop excisions. Embryonal RMS of the cervix are mostly either treated with surgery alone or with adjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. 48\nThe literature indicates regional lymph node removal as an option in patients presenting with low-risk disease manifestations but a recommended compulsion in patients with high-risk disease. 7\nAdditionally, RMS is also known to be a chemosensitive tumor. Adjuvant chemotherapy targets micro lymphatic metastases if any. Even with adjuvant chemotherapy regimens, there is no uniform agreement in managing these tumors. Most investigators have used a combination of two or three chemotherapeutic agents. The most widely used chemotherapy regimen is VAC (Vincristine -Actinomycin- Cyclophosphamide), which is the current gold standard chemotherapy regimen utilized for the management of cervical embryonal RMS, including botryoid RMS. 48\nTrials with Ifosfamide also proved successful as a chemotherapeutic agent in the management of cervical RMS, in combination with vincristine and actinomycin (VIA regimen). However, in Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study - IV (IRS IV), patients were randomized to receive chemotherapy with VAC or VAI. No significant difference in outcome was noted, and the American investigators elected the VAC as the gold-standard due to the lower cost and nephrotoxicity of cyclophosphamide. 7\nThe survival rate in patients with cervical embryonal RMS depends upon a number of factors, where (i) the tumor stage and (ii) the modality of management are important determining factors. Most patients can survive disease-free for more than 12 months for early-stage malignancy through surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. Additionally, research has shown that for adult rhabdomyosarcoma, surgery combined with VAC chemotherapy can have an overall survival of 55% and a disease-free survival rate of 64% at 2 years. 14 , 49\n\nEmbryonal RMS of the uterine cervix is a rare malignancy in adults with a relatively poor prognostic outcome. Although rare, it should be suspected in a patient with vaginal bleeding and a large cervical polyp. Histopathology combined with appropriate immunohistochemistry plays a major role in the pathological detection of the tumor and, thereby, planning apposite management. Timely detection of this rare adult tumor can go a long way in improving the patient's survival.","source_license":"CC-BY-4.0","license_restricted":false}