{"paper_id":"9f34a78b-146d-496e-ab29-281ca3c64996","body_text":"Abstract\nAim: To assess the degree of inflammatory-necrotic destructive process in the body of reproductive age women of with ovarian endometriomas after surgical treatment using different types of energy.\nMaterials and methods. A comprehensive clinical and laboratory examination and surgical treatment by laparoscopic access were performed on 120 women of reproductive age with ovarian endometriomas, of which group I consisted of 60 patients who received intraoperative LOTUS ultrasonic scalpel, group II consisted of 60 patients who underwent bipolar coagulation of ovarian tissues. The examination protocol included an assessment of the clinical course of the postoperative period, indicators of general and biochemical blood tests, including biochemical markers of tissue destruction products. Statistical data processing was performed using a computer program “Statistica 13. 3.721”.\nResults. The analysis of clinical and laboratory studies in reproductive age women of with ovarian endometriomas revealed a higher effectiveness of the LOTUS ultrasound system compared to bipolar coagulation, as indicated by a 1.3-fold increase in the number of women with a low degree of tissue trauma and a 1.4-fold decrease in the number of women with an average degree of tissue trauma ( p˂0.05), a 1.3-fold decrease in patients with leukocytosis, a 1.2-fold decrease in patients with an elevated level of C-reactive protein, a lower content of tissue destruction products in the blood of patients (p˂0.05), as well as a 1.2-fold shortening of the postoperative rehabilitation period (p<0.05).\nConclusion. Quantitative scoring of surgical trauma in reproductive age women of with ovarian endometriomas objectively demonstrated the effectiveness of intraoperative use of the LOTUS ultrasound system compared to bipolar coagulation of ovarian tissue (p˂0.05). The fact of a less traumatic operation when using the LOTUS ultrasound system was confirmed by clinical and laboratory data, including a lower content of tissue destruction products in the blood of patients: MSM 280 by 1.3 times, MSM 254 by 1.2 times, KFNK by 1.2 times, TBK- ap by 1.5 times and a 2.2-fold higher level of ETI (p˂0.05).\nReferences\nAllaire C, Bedaiwy MA, & Yong P. J. [Diagnosis and management of endometriosis]. Cmaj. 2023. 195(10), E363-E371. DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.220637.\nGriffiths MJ, Horne AW, Gibson DA, Roberts N. Saunders P.T. [Endometriosis: recent advances that could accelerate diagnosis and improve care]. Trends in Molecular Medicine. 2024. 30 (9): 875-889. DOI: 10.1016/j.molmed.2024.06.008.\nDyndar OA, Dymarska OZ [Medical-social audit of reproductive age women with ovarian endometriomas]. Medical Science of Ukraine (MSU). 2024. 20(1), 4-11. [In Ukrainian] DOI: 10.32345/2664-4738.1.2024.01.\nGruber TM, Mechsner S. [Pathogenesis of Endometriosis: The Origin of Pain and Subfertility]. Cells. 2021; 10 (6): 1381. DOI: 10.3390/cells10061381.\nInternational working group of AAGL, ESGE, ESHRE and WES, Tomassetti C, Johnson N. P, Petrozza J, Abrao M. S, Einarsson J. I, De Wilde R. L. [An international terminology for endometriosis]. Human Reproduction Open, 2021(4), hoab029. DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoab029.\nAlshehre SM, Narice BF, Fenwick MA, Metwally M. [The impact of endometrioma on in vitro fertilisation/intra-cytoplasmic injection IVF/ICSI reproductive outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis]. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2021. 303 3-16. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-020-05796-9.\nMoreno-Sepulveda J, Romeral C, Niño G, Pérez-Benavente A. [The effect of laparoscopic endometrioma surgery on anti-müllerian hormone: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis]. JBRA assisted reproduction. 2022. 26(1), 88. DOI: 10.5935/1518-0557.20210060.\nKhmil SV, Vizniak TB, Khmil MS, Romanchuk LI, Pidhaina IY. [Endometrios – associated infertility: new approaches to diagnostic and treatment]. Achievements of Clinical and Experimental Medicine. 2023. (4), 26–34. [In Ukrainian]. DOI: 10.11603/1811-2471.2022.v.i4.13494.\nTroìa L, Biscione A, Colombi I, Luisi S. [Management of Endometriosis in Teenagers. Endometriosis Pathogenesis]. Frontiers in Gynecological Endocrinology. 2021. 9: 51-63. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-57866-4_6.\nMartire FG, Piccione E, Exacoustos C, Zupi E. [Endometriosis and adolescence: The impact of dysmenorrhea]. Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. 12(17), 5624. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12175624.\nSalliss ME, Farland LV, Mahnert ND, Herbst-Kralovetz MM. [The role of gut and genital microbiota and the estrobolome in endometriosis, infertility and chronic pelvic pain]. Human reproduction update. 2022. 28(1), 92-131. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmab035.\nSidhu A, Dahiya N, Eathorne A, Armour M, Barto W, Condous G. Surgical [Outcomes After Colorectal Surgery for Intestinal Deep Endometriosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study]. Turk J Colorectal Dis. 2024. 34(1): 13-18. DOI: 10.4274/tjcd.galenos.2024.2023-12-1.\nCasalechi M, Spina G, Reschini M, Di Stefano G, Mondini I, Marinello D, Viganò P. [P-275 Advanced hemostasis assessment in endometriosis: strengthening confidence in the safety of hormonal treatments]. Human Reproduction. 2024. 39(1), deae108-643. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deae108.643.\nGao X, Jin Y, Zhang G. [Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Impact of Various Hemostasis Methods on Ovarian Reserve Function in Laparoscopic Cystectomy for Ovarian Endometriomas]. Alternative Therapies in Health & Medicine. 2024. 30(8): p312. Available on: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38064608/.\nBortot B, Di Florio R, Merighi S, Peacock B, Lees R, Valle F, Biffi S. [Platelets as key cells in endometriosis patients: Insights from small extracellular vesicles in peritoneal fluid and endometriotic lesions analysis]. The FASEB Journal. 2024. 38(24): e70267. DOI: 10.1096/fj.202402499R.\nCusack B, Buggy DJ. [Anaesthesia, analgesia, and the surgical stress response]. BJA education. 2020. 20(9): 321-328. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjae.2020.04.006.\nBoyko VV, Likhman VM. Shevchenko OM, Merculov AO, Ponomarova KV. [Сriteria for assessing endogenous intoxication in patients with multiple peritonitis]. Wiadomości Lekarskie monthly journal. 2022. 75(12): 3050–3054. DOI: 10.36740/wlek202212127.\nDeckers P, Ribeiro SC, Simoes RDS, Miyahara C, Baracat EC. [Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of bipolar electrocoagulation during laparoscopic ovarian endometrioma stripping on ovarian reserve]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2017. 140(1): 11–17. DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.12338.\nCrestani A, Merlot B, Dennis T, Roman H. [Laparoscopic sclerotherapy for an endometrioma in 10 steps]. Fertility and Sterility. 2022. 117(5): 1102–1103. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.01.036.\nD’Alterio MN, Saponara S, Agus M, Laganà AS, Noventa M, Loi ES, Angioni S. [Medical and surgical interventions to improve the quality of life for endometriosis patients: a systematic review]. Gynecological Surgery. 2021. 18(1): 13. DOI: 10.1186/s10397-021-01096-5.\nLing X, Lu J, Wang X, Liu L, Liu L, Wang Y, Yu Z. [Ovarian tumorB1-mediated heat shock transcription factor 1 deubiquitination is critical for glycolysis and development of endometriosis]. Iscience. 2022. 25(11): 105363. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.105363.\nPostovitenko KP, Storozhuk LO, Seleznyova IB, Storozhuk BG, Dovgalyuk TV. [The state of hemostasis in patients with CKD VD stage with some comorbid conditions]. Reports of Vinnytsia National Medical University. 2020. 24(2): 253-260. DOI: 10.31393/reports-vnmedical-2020-24(2)-10.\nKorniichuk YV, Grushanska NH, Kostenko VM. [Prevention of mineral metabolism of disorders in lactating rabbits]. Scientific Messenger of LNU of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies. Series: Veterinary Sciences. 2020. 22(97): 147-156. DOI: 10.32718/nvlvet9724.\nDyndar OA, Dymarska OZ. [Women of reproductive age endogenous intoxication level assessment after surgical treatment of endometriosis]. Ukrainian Journal «Health of Woman» 2024. 4 (173): 15-20 [In Ukrainian]. DOI: 10.15574/HW.2024.4(173).1520.\nThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.","source_license":"CC0","license_restricted":false}