{"paper_id":"9ce80585-5b3a-4120-bb11-a48f48de08c9","body_text":"Abstract\nRegulation of the actin cytoskeleton is essential for epithelial cell polarity and protein trafficking within human uterine epithelium. The actin-binding protein cofilin is involved in regulation of actin dynamics by promoting actin branching and cytoskeleton reorganization. Dual immunohistochemical staining of cofilin and G-actin (represented by DNAse I staining) revealed cofilin-G-actin colocalization in the apical side of luminal epithelial cells of human uterine endometrium during the proliferative phase of the menstrual cycle. Interestingly, during the secretory phase of the menstrual cycle, cofilin was only present on the basolateral side. To determine whether the disease endometriosis causes a different pattern of actin remodeling, we investigated an established baboon model of induced endometriosis. The cofilin pattern in the secretory phase of baboons with endometriosis was similar to the proliferative phase in normal animals; cofilin was observed in the apical parts of luminal and glandular epithelium. A phosphatase regulating the activity of cofilin, slingshot (SSH1), revealed a similar staining pattern within these tissues. These patterns were confirmed through quantitative image analysis. Quantification of messenger RNA (mRNA) detected upregulated SSH1 and suggested a progesterone resistance-related pattern of nuclear steroid hormone receptors, but no change in membrane progesterone receptors (mPR alpha or mPR beta) was observed in endometriosis. Our data indicate that the severe dyssynchrony during menstrual cycle phases in endometriosis is connected with improper cytoskeleton rearrangements. We suggest that cofilin-mediated actin reorganization in uterine epithelial cells might be important in preparation for blastocyst implantation; dysregulation of this reorganization may lead to decreased fertility in endometriosis.\nSimilar content being viewed by others\nReferences\nAdissu HA, Asem EK, Lelievre SA. Three-dimensional cell culture to model epithelia in the female reproductive system. Reprod Sci. 2007;14(8 suppl):11–19\nMellman I, Nelson WJ. Coordinated protein sorting, targeting and distribution in polarized cells. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2008;9(11):833–845\nLi R, Gundersen GG. Beyond polymer polarity: how the cytoskeleton builds a polarized cell. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2008;9(11):860–873\nNishida E, Maekawa S, Muneyuki E, Sakai H. Action of a 19K protein from porcine brain on actin polymerization: a new functional class of actin-binding proteins. J Biochem. 1984;95(2):387–398\nPaavilainen VO, Bertling E, Falck S, Lappalainen P. Regulation of cytoskeletal dynamics by actin-monomer-binding proteins. Trends Cell Biol. 2004;14(7):386–394\nBamburg JR. Proteins of the ADF/cofilin family: essential regulators of actin dynamics. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 1999;15:185–230\nHuang TY, DerMardirossian C, Bokoch GM. Cofilin phosphatases and regulation of actin dynamics. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2006;18(1):26–31\nAgnew BJ, Minamide LS, Bamburg JR. Reactivation of phosphorylated actin depolymerizing factor and identification of the regulatory site. J Biol Chem. 1995;270(29):17582–17587\nBamburg JR, Bernstein BW. ADF/cofilin. Curr Biol. 2008;18(7):R273–R275\nNiwa R, Nagata-Ohashi K, Takeichi M, Mizuno K, Uemura T. Control of actin reorganization by Slingshot, a family of phosphatases that dephosphorylate ADF/cofilin. Cell. 2002;108(2):233–246\nGohla A, Birkenfeld J, Bokoch GM. Chronophin, a novel HAD-type serine protein phosphatase, regulates cofilin-dependent actin dynamics. Nat Cell Biol. 2005;7(1):21–29\nNishida E, Maekawa S, Sakai H. Cofilin, a protein in porcine brain that binds to actin filaments and inhibits their interactions with myosin and tropomyosin. Biochemistry. 1984;23(22):5307–5313\nGohla A, Bokoch GM. 14-3-3 regulates actin dynamics by stabilizing phosphorylated cofilin. Curr Biol. 2002;12(19):1704–1710\nKligys K, Claiborne JN, DeBiase PJ, et al. The slingshot family of phosphatases mediates Rac1 regulation of cofilin phosphorylation, laminin-332 organization, and motility behavior of keratinocytes. J Biol Chem. 2007;282(44):32520–32528\nSoosairajah J, Maiti S, Wiggan O, et al. Interplay between components of a novel LIM kinase-slingshot phosphatase complex regulates cofilin. EMBO J. 2005;24(3):473–486\nEskenazi B, Warner ML. Epidemiology of endometriosis. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 1997;24(2):235–258\nGupta S, Goldberg JM, Aziz N, Goldberg E, Krajcir N, Agarwal A. Pathogenic mechanisms in endometriosis-associated infertility. Fertil Steril. 2008;90(2):247–257\nde Ziegler D, Borghese B, Chapron C. Endometriosis and infertility: pathophysiology and management. Lancet. 2010;376(9742):730–738\nSlater M, Cooper M, Murphy CR. The cytoskeletal proteins alpha-actinin, Ezrin, and talin are De-expressed in endometriosis and endometrioid carcinoma compared with normal uterine epithelium. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2007;15(2):170–174\nIhnatovych I, Livak M, Reed J, de Lanerolle P, Strakova Z. Manipulating actin dynamics affects human in vitro decidualization. Biol Reprod. 2009;81(1):222–230\nMurphy CR. Uterine receptivity and the plasma membrane transformation. Cell Res. 2004;14(4):259–267\nFazleabas AT, Brudney A, Chai D, Langoi D, Bulun SE. Steroid receptor and aromatase expression in baboon endometriotic lesions. Fertil Steril. 2003;80(suppl 2):820–827\nFazleabas AT, Brudney A, Gurates B, Chai D, Bulun S. A modified baboon model for endometriosis. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2002;955:308–317\nRozen S, Skaletsky H. Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. Methods Mol Biol. 2000;132:365–386\nFernandes MS, Pierron V, Michalovich D, et al. Regulated expression of putative membrane progestin receptor homologues in human endometrium and gestational tissues. J Endocrinol. 2005;187(1):89–101\nRomero-Sanchez M, Peiper SC, Evans B, et al. Expression profile of heptahelical putative membrane progesterone receptors in epithelial ovarian tumors. Hum Pathol. 2008;39(7):1026–1033\nIshizuka M, Hatori M, Dohi O, et al. Expression profiles of sex steroid receptors in desmoid tumors. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2006;210(3):189–198\nZitao L, Kuokkanen S, Pal L. Steroid hormone receptor profile of premenopausal endometrial polyps. Reprod Sci. 2010;17(4):377–383\nNakamura Y, Suzuki T, Inoue T, et al. Progesterone receptor subtypes in vascular smooth muscle cells of human aorta. Endocr J. 2005;52(2):245–252\nStrakova Z, Reed J, Ihnatovych I. Human transcriptional coactivator with PDZ-binding motif (TAZ) is downregulated during decidualization. Biol Reprod. 2010;82(6):1112–1118\nHastings JM, Jackson KS, Mavrogianis PA, Fazleabas AT. The estrogen early response gene FOS is altered in a baboon model of endometriosis. Biol Reprod. 2006;75(2):176–182\nBernstein BW, Bamburg JR. ADF/cofilin: a functional node in cell biology. Trends Cell Biol. 2010;20(4):187–195\nKarlsson AB, Maizels ET, Flynn MP, et al. Luteinizing hormone receptor-stimulated progesterone production by preovulatory granulosa cells requires protein kinase a-dependent activation/ dephosphorylation of the actin dynamizing protein cofilin. Mol Endocrinol. 2010;24(9):1765–1781\nXu YL, Wang DB, Liu QF, Chen YH, Yang Z. Silencing of cofilin-1 gene attenuates biological behaviours of stromal cells derived from eutopic endometria of women with endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2010;25(10):2480–2488\nPollard TD, Borisy GG. Cellular motility driven by assembly and disassembly of actin filaments. Cell. 2003;112(4):453–465\nLuxford KA, Murphy CR. Changes in the apical microfilaments of rat uterine epithelial cells in response to estradiol and progesterone. Anat Rec. 1992;233(4):521–526\nLuxford KA, Murphy CR. Reorganization of the apical cytoskeleton of uterine epithelial cells during early pregnancy in the rat: a study with myosin subfragment 1. Biol Cell. 1992;74(2):195–202\nLuxford KA, Murphy CR. Cytoskeletal control of the apical surface transformation of rat uterine epithelium. Biol Cell. 1993;79(2):111–116\nTerry V, Shaw TJ, Shorey CD, Murphy CR. Actin-binding proteins undergo major alterations during the plasma membrane transformation in uterine epithelial cells. Anat Rec. 1996;246(1):71–77\nBirkenfeld J, Betz H, Roth D. Identification of cofilin and LIM-domain-containing protein kinase 1 as novel interaction partners of 14-3-3 zeta. Biochem J. 2003;369(pt 1):45–54\nMatsuzaki S, Canis M, Vaurs-Barriere C, Boespflug-Tanguy O, Dastugue B, Mage G. DNA microarray analysis of gene expression in eutopic endometrium from patients with deep endometriosis using laser capture microdissection. Fertil Steril. 2005;84(suppl 4):1180–1190\nGrewal S, Carver JG, Ridley AJ, Mardon HJ. Implantation of the human embryo requires Rac1-dependent endometrial stromal cell migration. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105(42):16189–16194\nBulun SE. Endometriosis. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(3):268–279\nFazleabas AT. Progesterone resistance in a baboon model of endometriosis. Semin Reprod Med. 2010;28(1):75–80\nLessey BA, Palomino WA, Apparao KB, Young SL, Lininger RA. Estrogen receptor-alpha (ER-alpha) and defects in uterine receptivity in women. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2006;4(suppl 1):S9\nZhu Y, Bond J, Thomas P. Identification, classification, and partial characterization of genes in humans and other vertebrates homologous to a fish membrane progestin receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100(5):2237–2242\nZhu Y, Rice CD, Pang Y, Pace M, Thomas P. Cloning, expression, and characterization of a membrane progestin receptor and evidence it is an intermediary in meiotic maturation of fish oocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100(5):2231–2236\nThomas P. Characteristics of membrane progestin receptor alpha (mPRalpha) and progesterone membrane receptor component 1 (PGMRC1) and their roles in mediating rapid progestin actions. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2008;29(2):292–312\nAuthor information\nAuthors and Affiliations\nCorresponding author\nRights and permissions\nAbout this article\nCite this article\nMorris, K., Ihnatovych, I., Ionetz, E. et al. Cofilin and Slingshot Localization in the Epithelium of Uterine Endometrium Changes During the Menstrual Cycle and in Endometriosis. Reprod. Sci. 18, 1014–1024 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1177/1933719111401663\nPublished:\nIssue date:\nDOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1933719111401663","source_license":"CC0","license_restricted":false}