{"paper_id":"9b403647-1dc4-47fd-958d-ec10a1a6763c","body_text":"Abstract\nExternal adenomyosis refers to deep infiltrative endometriosis (DIE) arising within the outer myometrium/uterine serosa with a variable depth of the invasion of the myometrium but with an intact junctional zone. It has been recently introduced into the literature as a separate entity to describe in MRI. Even if the spelling contains the term adenomyosis, external and internal adenomyosis are different conditions. External adenomyosis is highly associated with DIE or with endometriomas. The by far more common posterior type of external adenomyosis is almost always found in association with extensive DIE of the posterior compartment. Anterior external adenomyosis is typically found with or without continuity to DIE of the bladder, the uterovesical fold, or the round ligaments. Having exact information on the location, extent, and severity is an important criterion for treatment decisions.\nAccess this chapter\nTax calculation will be finalised at checkout\nPurchases are for personal use only\nSimilar content being viewed by others\nReferences\nBergeron C, Amant F, Ferenczy A. Pathology and physiopathology of adenomyosis. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;20:511–21.\nChapron C, Vannuccini S, Santulli P, Abrão MS, Carmona F, Fraser IS, Gordts S, Guo SW, Just PA, Noël JC, Pistofidis G, Van den Bosch T, Petraglia F. Diagnosing adenomyosis: an integrated clinical and imaging approach. Hum Reprod Update. 2020;26:392–411.\nHabiba M, Guo SW, Benagiano G. Are adenomyosis and endometriosis phenotypes of the same disease process? Biomol Ther. 2023;14(1):32i.\nBourdon M, Santulli P, Marcellin L, Maignien C, Maitrot-Mantelet L, Bordonne C, Plu Bureau G, Chapron C. Adenomyosis: an update regarding its diagnosis and clinical features. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2021;50:102228.\nMarcellin L, Santulli P, Bourdon M, Maignien C, Campin L, Lafay-Pillet MC, Millischer AE, Bordonne C, Borghese B, Dousset B, Chapron C. Focal adenomyosis of the outer myometrium and deep infiltrating endometriosis severity. Fertil Steril. 2020;114:818–27.\nVan den Bosch T, Van Schoubroeck D. Ultrasound diagnosis of endometriosis and adenomyosis: state of the art. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;51:16–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2018.01.013.\nPados G, Gordts S, Sorrentino F, Nisolle M, Nappi L, Daniilidis A. Adenomyosis and infertility: a literature review. Medicina. 2023;59(9):1551.\nZondervan KT, Becker CM, Missmer SA. Endometriosis. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:1244–56.\nKoninckx PR, Martin DC. Deep endometriosis: a consequence of infiltration or retraction or possibly adenomyosis externa? Fertil Steril. 1992;58:924–8.\nZegers-Hochschild F, Adamson GD, Dyer S, Racowsky C, de Mouzon J, Sokol R, Rienzi L, Sunde A, Schmidt L, Cooke ID, Simpson JL, van der Poel S. The international glossary on infertility and fertility care, 2017. Hum Reprod. 2017;32:1786–801.\nTellum T, Munro MG. Classifications of adenomyosis and correlation of phenotypes in imaging and histopathology to clinical outcomes: a review. Curr Obstet Gynecol Rep. 2022;11:1–11.\nHarmsen MJ, Van den Bosch T, de Leeuw RA, Dueholm M, Exacoustos C, Valentin L, Hehenkamp WJK, Groenman F, De Bruyn C, Rasmussen C, Lazzeri L, Jokubkiene L, Jurkovic D, Naftalin J, Tellum T, Bourne T, Timmerman D, Huirne JAF. Consensus on revised definitions of Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) features of adenomyosis: results of modified Delphi procedure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022;60:118–31.\nChapron C, Tosti C, Marcellin L, Bourdon M, Lafay-Pillet MC, Millischer AE, et al. Relationship between the magnetic resonance imaging appearance of adenomyosis and endometriosis phenotypes. Hum Reprod. 2017;32:1393–401. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dex088.\nDi Donato N, Montanari G, Benfenati A, Leonardi D, Bertoldo V, Monti G, Raimondo D, Seracchioli R. Prevalence of adenomyosis in women undergoing surgery for endometriosis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014;181:289–93.\nNaftalin J, Hoo W, Pateman K, Mavrelos D, Holland T, Jurkovic D. How common is adenomyosis? A prospective study of prevalence using transvaginal ultrasound in a gynaecology clinic. Hum Reprod. 2012;12:3432–9.\nWeiss G, Maseelall P, Schott LL, et al. Adenomyosis a variant, not a disease? Evidence from hysterectomized menopausal women in the Study of Womenʼs Health Across the Nation (SWAN). Fertil Steril. 2009;91:201–6.\nSun M, Xu P, Zou G, Wang J, Zhu L, Zhang X. Extrinsic adenomyosis is associated with postoperative recurrence of ovarian endometrioma. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022;12(8):815628. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.815628.\nBazot M, Daraï E. Role of transvaginal sonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of uterine adenomyosis. Fertil Steril. 2018;109:389–97.\nKishi Y, Suginami H, Kuramori R, Yabuta M, Suginami R, Taniguchi F. Four subtypes of adenomyosis assessed by magnetic resonance imaging and their specification. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;207:114.e1–7.\nZhang M, Bazot M, Tsatoumas M, et al. MRI of adenomyosis: where are we today? Curr Obstet Gynecol Rep. 2022;11:225–37.\nJha P, Sakala M, Chamie LP, Feldman M, Hindman N, Huang C, Kilcoyne A, Laifer-Narin S, Nicola R, Poder L, Shenoy-Bhangle A, Tong A, VanBuren W, Taffel MT. Endometriosis MRI lexicon: consensus statement from the society of abdominal radiology endometriosis disease-focused panel. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2020;45:1552–68.\nSiegelman ES, Oliver ER. MR imaging of endometriosis: ten imaging pearls. Radiographics. 2012;32:1675–91.\nChamié LP, Blasbalg R, Pereira RM, Warmbrand G, Serafini PC. Findings of pelvic endometriosis at transvaginal US, MR imaging, and laparoscopy. Radiographics. 2011;31(4):E77–100.\nLazzeri L, Morosetti G, Centini G, Monti G, Zupi E, Piccione E, et al. A sonographic classification of adenomyosis: interobserver reproducibility in the evaluation of type and degree of the myometrial involvement. Fertil Steril. 2018;110:1154–61.\nVan den Bosch T, de Bruijn AM, de Leeuw RA, Dueholm M, Exacoustos C, Valentin L, Bourne T, Timmerman D, Huirne JAF. Sonographic classification and reporting system for diagnosing adenomyosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019;53:576–82.\nKhan KN, Fujishita A, Koshiba A, Kuroboshi H, Mori T, Ogi H, et al. Biological differences between intrinsic and extrinsic adenomyosis with coexisting deep infiltrating endometriosis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2019;39:343–53.\nRousset P, Florin M, Bharwani N, Touboul C, Monroc M, Golfier F, Nougaret S, Thomassin-Naggara I, ENDOVALIRM Group. Deep pelvic infiltrating endometriosis: MRI consensus lexicon and compartment-based approach from the ENDOVALIRM group. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2023;104(3):95–112.\nLeyendecker G, Bilgicyildirim A, Inacker M, Stalf T, Huppert P, Mall G, Böttcher B, Wildt L. Adenomyosis and endometriosis. Re-visiting their association and further insights into the mechanisms of auto-traumatisation. An MRI study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015;291:917–32.\nGracia M, de Guirior C, Valdés-Bango M, et al. Adenomyosis is an independent risk factor for complications in deep endometriosis laparoscopic surgery. Sci Rep. 2022;12:7086.\nLarsen SB, Lundorf E, Forman A, Dueholm M. Adenomyosis and junctional zone changes in patients with endometriosis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011;157:206–11.\nDonnez J, Dolmans MM, Fellah L. What if deep endometriotic nodules and uterine adenomyosis were actually two forms of the same disease? Fertil Steril. 2019;111:454–6.\nBourdon M, Oliveira J, Marcellin L, Santulli P, Bordonne C, Maitrot Mantelet L, et al. Adenomyosis of the inner and outer myometrium are associated with different clinical profiles. Hum Reprod. 2021;36:349–57.\nMarcellin PS, Bortolato S, Morin C, Millischer AE, Borghese B, Chapron C. Anterior focal adenomyosis and bladder deep infiltrating endometriosis: is there a link? J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018;25:896–901.\nRousset P, Bischoff E, Charlot M, Grangeon F, Dubernard G, Paparel P, Lega JC, Golfier F. Bladder endometriosis: preoperative MRI analysis with assessment of extension to ureteral orifices. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2021;102:255–63.\nBusard MP, Mijatovic V, Lüchinger AB, Bleeker MC, Pieters-van den Bos IC, Schats R, van Kuijk C, Hompes PG, van Waesberghe JH. MR imaging of bladder endometriosis and its relationship with the anterior uterine wall: experience in a tertiary referral centre. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81:2106–11.\nFedele L, Bianchi S, Zanconato G, Bergamini V, Berlanda N, Carmignani L. Long-term follow-up after conservative surgery for bladder endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 2005;83:1729–33.\nCelli V, Dolciami M, Ninkova R, Ercolani G, Rizzo S, Porpora MG, Catalano C, Manganaro L. MRI and adenomyosis: what can radiologists evaluate? Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19:5840.\nBazot M, Daraï E, Benagiano GP, Reinhold C, Favier A, Roman H, Donnez J, Bendifallah S. ENDO_STAGE magnetic resonance imaging: classification to screen endometriosis. J Clin Med. 2022;11:2443.\nThomassin-Naggara I, Monroc M, Chauveau B, et al. Multicenter external validation of the deep pelvic endometriosis index magnetic resonance imaging score. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6(5):e2311686.\nBazot M, Cortez A, Darai E, Rouger J, Chopier J, Antoine JM, et al. Ultrasonography compared with magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: correlation with histopathology. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:2427–33.\nMargit Dueholm M, Lundorf E, Hansen ES, Solgård Sørensen J, Ledertoug S, Olesen F. Magnetic resonance imaging and transvaginal ultrasonography for the diagnosis of adenomyosis. Fertil Steril. 2001;76:588–94.\nReinhold C, McCarthy S, Bret PM, Mehio A, Atri M, Zakarian R, Glaude Y, Liang L, Seymour RJ. Diffuse adenomyosis: comparison of endovaginal US and MR imaging with histopathologic correlation. Radiology. 1996;199(1):151–8.\nTellum T, Matic GV, Dormagen JB, Nygaard S, Viktil E, Qvigstad E, Lieng M. Diagnosing adenomyosis with MRI: a prospective study revisiting the junctional zone thickness cutoff of 12 mm as a diagnostic marker. Eur Radiol. 2019;29:6971–81.\nKubik-Huch RA, Weston M, Nougaret S, Leonhardt H, Thomassin-Naggara I, Horta M, Cunha TM, Maciel C, Rockall A, Forstner R. European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) guidelines: MR imaging of leiomyomas. Eur Radiol. 2018;28:3125–37.\nDi Donato N, Montanari G, Benfenati A, Leonardi D, Bertoldo V, Monti G, Raimondo D, Seracchiol R. Prevalence of adenomyosis in women undergoing surgery for endometriosis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014;181:289–93.\nKeckstein J, Saridogan E, Ulrich UA, et al. The #Enzian classification: a comprehensive non-invasive and surgical description system for endometriosis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021;100:1165–75.\nLazzeri L, Di Giovanni A, Exacoustos C, Tosti C, Pinzauti S, Malzoni M, Petraglia F, Zupi E. Preoperative and postoperative clinical and transvaginal ultrasound findings of adenomyosis in patients with deep infiltrating endometriosis. Reprod Sci. 2014;21:1027–33.\nExacoustos C, Manganaro L, Zupi E. Imaging for the evaluation of endometriosis and adenomyosis. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2014;28:655–81.\nExacoustos C, Lazzeri L, Martire FG, Russo C, Martone S, Centini G, Piccione E, Zupi E. Ultrasound findings of adenomyosis in adolescents: type and grade of the disease. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2022;29:291–299.e1.\nDi Donato N, Bertoldo V, Montanari G, Zannoni L, Caprara G, Seracchioli R. Question mark form of uterus: a simple sonographic sign associated with the presence of adenomyosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;46:126–7.\nZannoni L, Ambrosio M, Raimondo D, Arena A, Del Forno S, Borghese G, Paradisi R, Seracchioli R. Question mark sign and transvaginal ultrasound uterine tenderness for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: a prospective validation. J Ultrasound Med. 2020;39:1405–12.\nChiang CH, Chang MY, Hsu JJ, et al. Tumor vascular pattern and blood flow impedance in the differential diagnosis of leiomyoma and adenomyosis by color doppler sonography. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1999;16:268–75.\nChampaneria R, Abedin P, Daniels J, Balogun M, Khan KS. Ultrasound scan and magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: systematic review comparing test accuracy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010;89:1374–84.\nAcknowledgments\nI express many thanks to Professor Isabelle Thomassin-Naggara, Paris, for helping me with US and MRI cases.\nAuthor information\nAuthors and Affiliations\nCorresponding author\nEditor information\nEditors and Affiliations\nRights and permissions\nCopyright information\n© 2025 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG\nAbout this chapter\nCite this chapter\nForstner, R. (2025). Mediocentral Compartment: Uterus: External Adenomyosis. In: Thomassin-Naggara, I. (eds) Imaging of Endometriosis: A Comparative Guide of US, MRI and Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-82750-1_8\nDownload citation\nDOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-82750-1_8\nPublished:\nPublisher Name: Springer, Cham\nPrint ISBN: 978-3-031-82749-5\nOnline ISBN: 978-3-031-82750-1\neBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)","source_license":"CC0","license_restricted":false}