{"paper_id":"9477d2b3-a064-4e86-9246-06bd23507539","body_text":"The journey of new life begins with the formation of an embryo, which must be implanted in the uterus to establish a functional interaction between mother and fetus in mammals ( 1 ). Embryo implantation and placentation are key steps in the establishment of this communication and are required for a successful pregnancy. As the blastocyst acquires implantation competency, the endometrium differentiates to become receptive to the embryos under the regulation of estrogen (E2) and progesterone (P4) ( 2 ). Upon completion of implantation, the outer trophectoderm (TE) of the blastocyst begins to differentiate and forms the placenta, a transient organ that acts as a barrier between the mother and fetus ( 3 ). The placenta facilitates the exchange of nutrients and oxygen while protecting the fetus from harmful substances ( 4 ). Disturbance to implantation and placentation may lead to pregnancy-related complications, such as recurrent pregnancy loss, infertility, pre-eclampsia, fetal growth restriction, preterm birth, and stillbirth ( 5 ). Thus, a better understanding of the underlying molecular networks of embryo implantation and placentation will help to advance our understanding of the causes of pregnancy complications.\nEpigenetic control is the process by which gene expression is regulated by chemical modifications to DNA and its associated proteins, without altering the underlying genetic code ( 6 ). These modifications act like switches, turning genes on or off, and allowing cells to respond to changing environmental signals, and have been implicated in a wide range of biological processes, including development, aging, and disease ( 7 ). It includes a range of chemical changes, such as DNA methylation, non-coding RNA (ncRNA) expression, and histone modification we aimed at in this review. Histones can be modified in a variety of ways, including methylation, acetylation, phosphorylation, ubiquitylation and poly (ADP)-ribosylation ( 8 ). These histone modifications affect chromatin compaction and accessibility of transcription factors or cofactors, thereby regulating gene transcriptional activation or silencing. The enzymes involved in catalyzing this histone modification can be classified as \"writer\" and \"eraser\". \"Writer\" refers to the enzymes that add histone modifications to histones, such as histone methyltransferases, histone acetyltransferases, and so on. “Eraser” removes specific modifications, including histone demethylases and histone deacetylases ( 9 ). The study of histone modification has been a rapidly growing field in recent years, and have discovered that changes in histone modification patterns are associated with a range of diseases, including cancer, cardiovascular disease, and neurodevelopmental disorders ( 10 ,  11 ).\nRecent studies have revealed that histone modifications play critical roles in determining the success of embryo implantation and placenta development, providing valuable insights into the underlying molecular mechanisms. In this review, we present the current findings of implantation and placentation events in various model systems and in humans, primarily focusing on the impact of histone modifications on the embryo-uterus dialogues during gestation ( \n Figure 1 \n ). A better understanding of the roles of histone modification in these processes may reveal new predictive and therapeutic targets for pregnancy-related complications.\nHistone modifications required for mouse embryo implantation and placentation. The upper panel illustrates the crucial writers and erasers involved in histone methylation (EZH2, Menin, and PR-Set7), histone acetylation (Hdac3, Sirt1 and P300), and histone ubiquitination (PRC1) during mouse embryo implantation. These modifications contribute to stroma decidualization by regulating critical gene expression (e.g.,  Wnt4 ,  Ccnd2 ,  Cola1/2 ,  Ptx3 , and  IGFBP1 ). In the lower panel, histone modifications, including methylation and acetylation, are shown to be essential for placentation. Changes in histone methylation by writers (EED/EZH2, Suv39h1/2) or erasers (Kdm3a/4c/5b, LSD1) control gene expression required for trophoblast stemness, self-renew, invasion and differentiation. Acetylation regulators, including histone acetylases (CBP/P300) and deacetylases (Hdac1/2/6), are involved in TSC epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and differentiation.\n\nThe process of embryo implantation in both humans and mice involves a series of pivotal events, including 1) the establishment of receptivity in the uterine cavity; 2) the attachment reaction between the trophoblast and endometrial epithelium; 3) the interplay between trophoblast cells, endometrial epithelium, and stromal cells during the invasion of trophoblast cells and initiation of decidualization ( 12 ). Despite variations in the manner of blastocyst invasion into the endometrial lining among different species, many features of the implantation and decidualization process exhibit a commonality. Consequently, the molecular regulation of implantation and decidualization holds many similarities between humans and model organisms ( 1 ). Due to experimental difficulties and ethical restrictions, our understanding of human implantation still relies predominantly on animal models, particularly the mouse. The Cre-loxP system represents a potent investigative tool for discerning the physiological functions of genes across various organs ( 13 ). To conduct effective targeted knockout studies, it is necessary to utilize tissue-specific promoters to drive the expression of Cre recombinase ( \n Table 1 \n ). Utilizing genetically modified mouse models and human clinical tissues, epigenetic regulations have been proven important in regulating the establishment of endometrial receptivity, blastocyst attachment and subsequent decidualization in recent years.\nMouse models expressing cre recombinase in the uterus.\nH3K27me3 exerts a repressive effect on gene transcription ( 21 ). To investigate the importance of H3K27me3 in decidualization, researchers isolated primary endometrial stromal cells (ESCs) from human endometrial tissues and induced decidualization in  vitro . Transcriptome and epigenome profiles of the cells were obtained, revealing certain alterations in H3K27ac and H3K27me3 at the promoter regions of genes critical for decidualization, such as WNT4, ZBTB16, PROK1, and GREB1. This finding suggests the significance of H3K27me3 in the decidualization process ( 22 ). Brosens’s group has reported a significant decrease in the level of H3K27 methylation at the promoter distal end of decidual markers PRL and IGFBP-1, during the process of endometrial stroma-decidua transformation in human endometrium ( 23 ). Furthermore, studies have established that the generation and erasure of H3K27me3 in decidual stromal cells during pregnancy plays a critical role in the maintenance of gestation ( 24 ). The transcriptional silencing of specific gene targets by H3K27me3 helps to maintain uterine quiescence and prevents decidual expression of parturition-inducing hormone receptors, manifesting type 1 immunity and generating myofibroblasts for wound-healing responses. On the other hand, genome-wide H3K27 demethylation in late gestation allows for target gene upregulation and decidual activation, leading to labor entry ( 24 ).\nPolycomb repressive complex 2 subunit (Ezh2), a core component of polycomb repressive complexes 2, is a histone methyltransferase that catalyzes mono-, di-, and tri-methylates histone H3 at lysine 27 ( 25 ). Given the extensive function of H3K27me3 in the process of implantation, researchers use  Pgr-cre  mouse model to conditional delete  Ezh2  in the uterus in order to further explore the roles of H3K27me3 in implantation ( 26 – 29 ). Osokine et al. provide evidence of the critical role of Ezh2 in the regulation of wound healing responses in the decidual stromal cells during early pregnancy. They demonstrated that Ezh2 confers resistance to TGF-β-mediated wound healing signals in the decidual cells. Conversely, the loss of EZH2 from the decidua leads to fibroblast activation, the induction of TGF-β target genes, and ultimately, pregnancy failure ( 28 ). H3K27me3-related gene silencing is canceled after EZH2 deletion, leading to dysregulated cell-cycle regulators expression, causing severe epithelial and stromal differentiation defects and failed embryo invasion ( 29 ). Unlike those studies using  Pgr-Cre  to conditional knockout  Ezh2 , deletion of  Ezh2  using  Amhr2-Cre  leads to marked defects in uterine adenogenesis. The deficient uterine adenogenesis was accompanied by impaired uterine function and pregnancy loss ( 30 ). These findings confirm the essential roles of  Ezh2 -mediated H3K27me3 in implantation.\nThe H3K4me3 modification can be methylated by the mixed-lineage leukemia MLL1/2 complex and is predominantly located in the gene transcription start region, where it functions as a transcriptional activator ( 31 ). Menin, as a crucial component of the MLL complex, can regulate gene transcription through H3K4me3 ( 32 ). Liu et al. utilized a combination of genetic, biochemical, and pharmacological approaches to prove that  Men1  conditional knockout in uterus disrupts the appropriated differentiation of decidual stromal cells through regulating the expression of  Ptx3  in an H3K4me3 dependent manner. The reduction in  Ptx3  expression subsequent to  Men1  ablation leads to the aberrant activation of ERK1/2, resulting in a decrease in BMP2 induction and impaired decidualization ( 33 ).  Pr-set7 , as a methyltransferase of H4K20me1, has been reported to have a crucial role in regulating gland development of uterus and promoting the maintenance of pregnancy ( 34 ).\nAs early as the 1970s, scholars had confirmed that treatment with E2 in the mouse and rat uterus resulted in an increase in histone acetylation levels ( 35 ,  36 ). Histone deacetylase blockers and HDAC inhibitors enhance proliferative and morphogenetic effects of E2 on the mouse uterus ( 37 ,  38 ). Moreover, H3K27ac is upregulated during decidualization and is significantly enriched at the distal promoter of the decidualization marker IGFBP1 ( 39 ), These findings suggest that histone acetylation plays a crucial role in regulating uterine receptivity and decidualization during implantation, possibly through modulation of ER and PR in response to E2 and P4.\nHdac3 is a class I histone deacetylases (Hdac) family, which is dependent on Zn 2+  and responsible for transferring the acetyl group from acetylated histone proteins ( 40 ). Conditional ablation of  Hdac3  using  Pgr-cre  mouse model resulted in infertility caused by impaired implantation and decidualization. The loss of  HDAC3  caused decidualization defects due to abnormal activation of  Col1a1  and  Col1a2  genes, and this regulatory mechanism is conserved in human endometrium ( 41 ). In addition, the application of HDAC inhibitors to endometrial stromal cells enhances the histone acetylation levels of the TIMP-1 and TIMP-3 promoter regions, promoting gene transcription and suppressing the invasion of trophoblast ( 42 ).\nSirtuin1 (SIRT1) is a member of the sirtuin family of Class III histone deacetylases which has been reported to be involved in the regulation of cellular senescence and aging ( 43 ). Sirt1 mediates the deacetylation of histones and non-histone proteins in an NAD + -dependent manner ( 44 ). Regarding histones, SIRT1 exhibits the ability to deacetylate several lysine residues, including lysine 26 of histone H1 (H1K26), lysine 9, 14, 18, and 56 of histone H3 (H3K9, H3K14, H3K18, and H3K56), and lysine 6, 12, and 16 of histone H4 (H4K6, H4K12, and H4K16). By modulating the acetylation status of these specific lysine sites, SIRT1 plays a crucial role in regulating the transcription of relevant genes ( 45 ,  46 ). In addition to its impact on histones, SIRT1 also targets numerous non-histone proteins, including various transcription factors and co-factors. Notable examples include p53, HSF1, HIF-1α, NF-κB, p300, and KAT5. Through deacetylation, SIRT1 directly influences the functions of these proteins, thereby exerting broader effects on cellular processes ( 47 – 51 ). Recent studies using the  Pgr-cre  mouse model have confirmed that deletion of  Sirt1  resulted in impaired decidualization and pregnancy failure ( 52 ,  53 ). Moreover, the uterus exhibits signs of premature aging after  Sirt1  deletion ( 52 ). Interestingly, utilizing  Pgr-cre  to achieve uterine  Sirt1  overexpression also caused decidualization abnormalities and pregnancy failure ( 54 ). SIRT1 overexpression in endometriotic lesions worsens endometriosis development, but the application of Sirt1 inhibitor EX527 shows improvement ( 54 ). Although EX527 has already undergone a clinical trial for Huntington's disease and its safety was validated ( 55 ), the safety of EX527 for a developing embryo or fetus is a major concern. Therefore, further verification is needed to determine whether EX527 can be a promising drug for patients with pregnancy failure caused by decidualization abnormalities.\nThe process of human decidualization is associated with a significant increase in histone acetylation levels in the promoter regions of decidualization markers, such as IGFBP-1 and PRL. This increase makes transcriptional factors more accessible, thus promoting transcription ( 56 ,  57 ). Further research revealed that during decidualization, C/EBP and FOXO1 bind to the enhancer region of IGFBP-1, promoting its expression and increasing H3K27ac levels with the help of C/EBP's recruitment of p300 ( 39 ). Application of histone acetylation inhibitors in the uterine endometrial cells promoted the expression of glycodelin, a secretory protein that is induced by progesterone exposure during the early secretory phase following ovulation and remains present until the start of menstruation or the establishment of pregnancy ( 38 ,  58 ). HOXA10 is a crucial transcription factor that regulates uterine receptivity during implantation ( 59 ). HOXA10 can be acetylated by PCAF at K338 and K339 sites, which subsequently suppresses the expression of ITGB3 in endometrial epithelium, hindering embryonic implantation ( 60 ).\nThe Polycomb Repressive Complex 1 (PRC1) is an essential chromatin-based repressor of gene transcription which catalyzes monoubiquitination of histone H2A (H2AK119ub1) and stabilizes H3K27me3 modification. The PRC1’s catalytic center is comprised of the RING1A or RING1B protein and one of the six PCGF proteins ( 61 ). Inhibition of H2AK119ub1 disrupted the normal progression of decidualization, confirming the critical role of H2AK119ub1 mediated by PRC1 in decidualization ( 62 ). Xin et al. also reported that BMI1, a crucial component of PRC1, interacts with PR and the E3 ubiquitin ligase E6AP in a manner independent of PRC1, and mediates PR ubiquitination, allowing the uterus to respond to P4 during the establishment of uterine receptivity. Additionally, aberrantly low expression of BMI1 was observed in endometrial samples of patients with recurrent implantation failure, providing a potential target for the treatment of recurrent-implantation-failure ( 63 ).\nLactylation modification is a novel protein post-translational modification type induced by lactate that was first reported in 2019, and studies have shown that lactylation modification plays an important role in cancer, immunity, and other fields ( 64 – 66 ). Yang et al. found that during the pregnancy of sheep, the lactate content in the endometrial tissue and embryo significantly increased, as well as the H3K18la modification. The target genes regulated by H3K18la are mainly related to GSH metabolism and function. Moreover, the application of inhibitors to block glycolysis leads to a decrease in implantation capability in mice, while the application of lactate significantly rescued implantation capability. These findings suggest that histone lactylation plays an important role in the implantation process ( 67 ).\n\nAs the blastomeres proceed with development, the initial determination of cell fate commences, culminating in the gradual formation of the inside cells and outside cells, ultimately giving rise to two distinct lineages, the ICM and TE ( 68 ). During this period, cells from both lineages undergo loss of totipotency and are constrained to their respective lineage differentiation trajectories ( 69 ). In this fate-determining process, covalent histone modifications play critical roles.  In vitro  and in  vivo  experiments have demonstrated that deletion of SETDB1, a H3K9 methyltransferase, in mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs) induces their differentiation towards the TE lineage ( 70 ,  71 ). SUV39H1, another H3K9 methyltransferase, also suppresses ICM-associated gene expression during TE lineage development ( 72 ,  73 ). These studies indicated that the commitment of ICM versus TE is precisely regulated by the incorporation of H3K9me3 at specific chromatin domains by distinct histone methyltransferases. In addition to H3K9me3, H3K27me3, as a transcriptional repressive-associated histone modification, also plays a critical role in TE and ICM lineage differentiation ( 72 ,  73 ). There is a significant difference in the global H3K27me3 level between ICM and TE. In the ICM lineage, promoter regions of TE-associated genes are enriched with H3K27me3 modification, while H3K27me3 enrichment on  Cdx2  and  Gata3  genes gradually decreases during TE lineage differentiation and development ( 72 ,  73 ). These findings suggest the importance of H3K27me3 in cell fate determination. Interestingly,  Hdac1  binds to self-renewal-related genes  Oct4 ,  Sox2 , and  Nanog  in the ICM lineage, and to lineage-regulating genes  Cdx2 ,  Elf5 , and  Eomes  in the TE lineage, accompanied by transcriptional activation-associated modification H3 acetylation ( 74 ). These findings suggest that although the two lineages have differences, they also share similarities, such as Hdac1 binding to target genes in different lineages to maintain their respective self-renewal abilities ( 74 ).\nThe development of the placenta starts with contact between the blastocyst TE and the endometrial epithelium in both humans and mice. The blastocyst penetrates the endometrium  via  its trophoblastic cells and embeds deeply, accompanied by an abundance of proliferation and differentiation of these cells, which constitutes the primary placenta structure ( 3 ). Although both mouse and human placentas share a hemochorial nature, they exhibit distinct variations in their overall morphology ( 75 ).\nIn humans, upon contact with the decidual, a portion of trophoblastic cells undergo fusion to form primary syncytium, which penetrates the decidual layer and embeds deeply ( 4 ,  76 ). The trophoblasts with stemness undergo differentiation to form functional trophoblast subtypes, including cytotrophoblasts (CTB), syncytiotrophoblasts (STB), and extravillous trophoblasts (EVT) to fulfill the placental functions ( 77 ). These cells gradually form a villous-like structure, composed of fetal vessels and mesenchymal stroma. The CTB and STB which are located at the outer layer of the placental villi, absorb nutrients from the maternal blood and form the maternal-fetal barrier that provides protection for the fetus ( 77 ,  78 ). Meanwhile, the EVT migrates and invades the decidual layer and even the myometrium to anchor the placenta firmly in the uterus and remodel the spiral arteries of the uterus to establish maternal-fetal blood circulation ( 76 – 78 ).\nIn mice, TE continues to proliferate to form extraembryonic ectoderm (EXE) and the ectoplacental cone (EPC). The extraembryonic mesoderm appears at E6.5 and gives rise to the allantois and the extraembryonic mesodermal layers of the amnion and chorion ( 3 ,  79 ). At E8.5, the fusion of the allantois with the chorion constitutes a key event in placenta maturation. The fusion facilitates the invagination of blood vessels derived from the extraembryonic mesoderm into the trophoblastic layer of the chorion, forming the key structure of the placenta-the labyrinth layer ( 79 ). As the labyrinth layer of the placenta expands, the trophoblasts differentiate into syncytiotrophoblasts (STB) and sinusoidal trophoblast giant cells (TGC) to fulfill their respective roles in placental function ( 3 ).\nAlthough mice and humans have different placental structures and key developmental genes, conditional knockout mice remain the main model for investigating placental development due to their shared classification as hemochorial placentas and the convenience of genetic manipulation ( 4 ). The mouse models that express Cre specifically in different trophoblast cell types are used to investigate the function and potential mechanisms of different genes ( \n Table 2 \n ).\nMouse models expressing cre recombinase in the trophoblast.\nDuring embryonic development, cells undergo the first lineage specification event, leading to the formation of either the embryonic or extra-embryonic lineage, the latter of which will develop into the placenta. In this process, there is a widespread loss of H3K27me3 in promoter regions, followed by rapid dynamics during the morula to blastocyst transition. ( 87 ,  88 ). Yang et al. reported that H3K27me3 and DNA methylation regulates key developmental genes in embryonic and extra-embryonic cells. This helps to maintain the highly regulated developmental plasticity in the embryonic cells, as well as restricting the developmental potential of the extra-embryonic cells ( 89 ). During pluripotent cell development, many genes bound by PRC2 have both the repressive H3K27me3 mark and the activating H3K4me3 mark. The H3K4me3/H3K27me3 bivalent state is absent in developmental genes until lineage differentiation initiates, and most bivalent genes are repressed ( 90 ). This regulatory mechanism allows genes to be silenced as key developmental regulators while being primed for future activation (or repression), and thus generally transition to monovalent configurations upon differentiation. In the embryonic lineage, PRC1 and poised RNAP are not recruited to the PRC2-bound genes. However, in the extra-embryonic lineage, bivalent genes are selectively targeted by Suv39h1-mediated H3K9me3 repression, which determines the initial fate ( 72 ).\nMaternal H3K27me3-mediated imprinting can mediate gene silencing in DNA hypomethylated regions during embryonic development ( 88 ). In trophoblast, the paternal imprinting of the Kcnq1 and IC2 domain on the distal end of mouse chromosome 7 is mainly achieved through H3K27me3 and H3K9me2 mediated by Polycomb complex, rather than relying on DNA methylation ( 91 – 93 ). Moreover, oocyte-derived H3K27me3 also plays a vital role in maintaining non-canonical gene imprinting in extraembryonic lineage cells ( 94 ). The significance of Polycomb complex in gene imprinting has been demonstrated through the whole-body knockout mouse model and triploid compensation experiments, which revealed that Eed knockout resulted in abnormal expression of the paternal imprinting gene  Mash2  ( 95 ). Animal cloning can be achieved through somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT), but the success rate is relatively low and often results in abnormal placental development. H3K27me3-mediated gene imprinting may be a key factor ( 96 ). Additionally, aberrant upregulation of H3K27me3-mediated clustered miRNAs from Sfmbt2 has been identified as the major cause of abnormal placental hyperplasia in SCNT mice ( 97 ).\nDuring the process of placenta maturation until the end of pregnancy, there are substantial changes in the epigenome of cytotrophoblasts. Lv et al. have reported that in trophoblast, EZH2 suppresses CDX1 expression to regulate its invasion through an H3K27me3-dependent manner ( 98 ). To further investigate the impact of EZH2 on placental development, Nugent et al. used  Cyp19-cre  to conditionally knockout  Ezh2 in the  placenta. After EZH2 deletion, female fetuses became more vulnerable to prenatal stress. But the placental morphology and function changes after EZH2 knockout remain obscure ( 99 ).\nH3K9 methylation is a histone modification associated with transcriptional repression and is reported to regulate the function of trophoblast ( 100 ,  101 ). Kdm3a is a demethylase that specifically targets H3K9 methylation. Chakraborty et al. have demonstrated that under hypoxic conditions, HIF downregulates H3K9 methylation at the Mmp12 promoter through Kdm3a, which promotes transcriptional expression of MMP9 and enhances trophoblast invasion ( 100 ). Meanwhile, methyltransferase Suv39h2 regulates H3K9 methylation and is involved in the pluripotency and differentiation of mTSC. Knockout of SUV39H2 in mTSC leads to significant changes in the landscape of H3K9 methylation and triggers differentiation ( 101 ).\nH3K4me3 is predominantly enriched at the transcription start site of active genes to activate transcription ( 102 ). KDM5B, as a demethylase of H3K4me3, regulates the self-renewal and H3K4 methylome in mTSC ( 103 ). Lsd1 can erase out monomethyl and dimethyl groups from H3K4me2/3 or H3K9me2/3 to activate or silence gene transcription ( 104 ,  105 ). Knockout of Lsd1 leads to abnormal development of EXE and ultimately embryo death ( 106 ). It has been demonstrated that  Lsd1  directly suppresses the expression of Ovol2 to maintain proper development of the EXE ( 106 ).  Lsd1  also regulates mitochondrial homeostasis in mTSC through the target gene  Sirt4  ( 107 ). Furthermore,  Lsd1  forms a complex with  Jdjm2b  and  Tfap2c  at critical gene promoters to activate transcription and safeguard the identity of mTSC ( 108 ). The abnormal H3K4me3 in the extraembryonic lineage caused by assisted reproductive technology (ART) procedures also results in developmental abnormalities. Knocking down the modifying enzyme  Kmt2e  can restore the expression of the corresponding genes and promote embryonic development ( 109 ). Besides, H3K4me3 expression is also found downregulated in human preeclampsia placenta ( 110 ).\nA recent study reported that human iPSCs can be induced to differentiate into trophoblast-like stem cells ( 111 ), which has important implications for both basic research and potential clinical applications. Interestingly, Yu et al. found that H3K36me2 modification plays a critical role in regulating the induction of pig iPSCs into trophoblast-like stem cells.  Kdm4c , as a demethylase of H3K36me3/2, activates the expression of  Cdx2  to promote this trans-differentiation process ( 112 ).\nThe establishment of a model using human trophoblast stem cells (hTSC) is of great importance for investigating the processes of trophoblast proliferation and differentiation during human placental development ( 113 ). In this context, the addition of the histone deacetylase inhibitor VPA proved to be particularly effective in promoting hTSC proliferation during the establishment phase, while other inhibitors like SAHA or TSA showed similar effects. These findings underscore the significance of histone acetylation in maintaining the pluripotency and proliferation of hTSCs, although the precise underlying mechanism remains unclear. During the differentiation of primary cytotrophoblasts, significant decreases in H3K27ac, H3K14ac, and H3ac are detected. This observation has been further validated in the Bewo, an epithelial cell line isolated from the placenta of a patient with choriocarcinoma ( 114 ). Moreover, the examination of placental tissues from pregnancy-related diseases revealed alterations in H3K8ac, H3K27ac, H3K9ac, and the histone deacetylase SIRT1 to varying extents, indicating a potential involvement of histone acetylation in the pathological mechanisms underlying placental diseases ( 110 ,  115 – 118 ).\nUsing  Sirt1 -null embryos and established mTSC, it was discovered that mTSC were unable to differentiate properly following  Sirt1  knockout ( 119 ). Similarly, Xiong et al. achieved trophoblast-specific knockout of  Sirt1  using  Elf5-cre  and observed the same phenotype, indicating that  Sirt1  knockout might activate key genes in trophoblasts and disrupt their developmental trajectory ( 120 ). In addition, Histone deacetylase 1 and 2 have been found critical in driving hTSC differentiation by controlling the expression of  TEAD4, TP63, OVOL1  and  CGB  ( 114 ). Additionally, HDAC6 has been proven required for trophoblast stem cell differentiation  via  directly deacetylates histones on the epithelial gene promoters such as Claudin 6 and Occludin during epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) of TS cells ( 121 ).\nBesides deacetylases, histone acetyltransferases have also been found important in trophoblast. Cbp is widely expressed and capable of acetylating both histone and non-histone proteins ( 122 ). Abell and colleagues discovered that the absence of Map3k4 in mTSC leads to EMT, through a mechanism in which the knockout of Map3k4 prevents the direct phosphorylation of Cbp by JNK, thereby promoting the acetylation of histone proteins H2A and H2B and facilitating the transcription of relevant genes ( 123 ). P300 is an originally identified coactivator of CBP. It plays a crucial role in acetylation of H3K9 and K3K27 associated with 11β-HSD2 expression in syncytiotrophoblasts ( 124 ).\nCitrullination is a post-translational modification (PTM) that is catalyzed by the peptidyl arginine deiminase (PAD) enzyme family, which includes PADI1-4 and PADI6 ( 125 ). Recent findings shed light on the significance of histone citrullination. Ballasy et al reported that  Padi2  and  Padi3 , the most widely expressed members of the PAD enzyme family in mTSCs, play a crucial role in regulating differentiation. Knockout of  Padi2  and  Padi3  resulted in decreased expression of  CDX2  and  SOX2 , leading to a bias towards trophoblast giant cell (TGC) differentiation. Additionally, deletion of  Padi2  and  Padi3  had a substantial impact on the epigenomic landscape of mTSC, resulting in a reduction in H3K9me3 and DNA methylation. Further investigation showed that decreased DNA methylation of differentiation genes, such as  Gata3 ,  Peg3 ,  Socs3 , and  Hand1 , was the main cause of their increased expression during differentiation ( 126 ). Furthermore, histone lactylation has also been found to play a regulatory role in trophoblast cells. In patient with preeclampsia, the placenta showed a significant increase in the H3K18la modification compared to the control group. The activation of target genes  FN1  and  SERPINE1  by H3K18la promotes placental fibrosis ( 127 ), indicating the functional significance of histone lactylation in placental pathology.\n\nIn recent years, emerging evidence has underscored the significance of epigenetic regulations during embryo implantation and placentation, highlighting their crucial role in these processes. Here, we focused specifically on histone modifications and summarized the key findings in this field. Despite increased knowledge on the topic, there are still many unknowns regarding the molecular basis of histone modifications and their roles in the interaction between the embryo and the uterus during gestation. Specifically, while considerable attention has been given to histone methylation and acetylation in the context of embryo implantation and placentation, further investigations are required to fully unravel the complexities of the epigenetic regulatory network involved, encompassing other types of modifications as well. In addition, despite the increasing studies of various histone modification factors at the maternal-fetal interface, comprehending the physiological and pathological functions, as well as the underlying mechanisms of these factors, remain major challenges in this field.\nMoreover, the existing models used in relevant research have certain limitations, primarily relying on traditional cell lines and conditional knockout mouse models. Unfortunately, many essential genes crucial for implantation and placentation cannot be thoroughly studied, as their knockout often leads to embryonic lethality or developmental defects. Hence, there is an urgent need to develop inducible Cre systems with uterus/placenta-specific gene promoters, enabling a more precise assessment of histone modifications throughout different stages of pregnancy. Additionally, considering the disparities between mice and humans, it is imperative to develop more diverse models, such as organoids and cell chips, to overcome the current limitations and effectively identify therapeutic targets for diseases such as implantation failure, preeclampsia, and fetal growth restriction.\n\nSB wrote the manuscript, ZT summarized the mouse models and prepared the figure, SZ and DC discussed the outline and revised the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.","source_license":"CC-BY-4.0","license_restricted":false}