{"paper_id":"93ab0ad7-4f21-4428-9864-ad738e424c04","body_text":"National Utilization Trends of Inpatient Procedures for Symptomatic Uterine Fibroids and Adenomyosis: A 10-Year Analysis\nAffiliations & Notes\naDivision of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina\nbErnest H. Wood Distinguished Professor & Chair, Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina\ncDivision of Cancer Epidemiology, Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina\ndAssociate Professor, Vice Chair of Health Equity & Community Engagement, Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina\neAssistant Professor, Interventional Radiology Residency Program Director, Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina\nArticle Info\nPublication History:\nPublished online December 9, 2024\nFootnotes:\nThe authors state that they have no conflict of interest related to the material discussed in this article. All authors are non-partner/non-partnership track/employees.\nDOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2024.11.031 External LinkAlso available on ScienceDirect External Link\nCopyright: © 2024 American College of Radiology\nLinked Articles\nDownload started\nOkVisual Abstract\nKey Words\nReferences\n1.\nViswanathan, M. ∙ Hartmann, K. ∙ McKoy, N. ...\nManagement of uterine fibroids: an update of the evidence\nEvid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2007; 1-122\n2.\nHerve, F. ∙ Katty, A. ∙ Isabelle, Q. ...\nImpact of uterine fibroids on quality of life: a national cross-sectional survey\nEur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018; 229:32-37\n3.\nKohi, M.P. ∙ Spies, J.B.\nUpdates on uterine artery embolization\nSemin Intervent Radiol. 2018; 35:48-55\n4.\nDariushnia, S.R. ∙ Nikolic, B. ∙ Stokes, L.S. ..., Society of Interventional Radiology Standards of Practice Committee\nQuality improvement guidelines for uterine artery embolization for symptomatic leiomyomata\nJ Vasc Interv Radiol. 2014; 25:1737-1747\n5.\nde Bruijn, A.M. ∙ Smink, M. ∙ Lohle, P.N.M. ...\nUterine artery embolization for the treatment of adenomyosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis\nJ Vasc Interv Radiol. 2017; 28:1629-1642.e1\n6.\nStewart, E.A. ∙ Cookson, C.L. ∙ Gandolfo, R.A. ...\nEpidemiology of uterine fibroids: a systematic review\nBJOG. 2017; 124:1501-1512\n7.\nUpson, K. ∙ Missmer, S.A.\nEpidemiology of adenomyosis\nSemin Reprod Med. 2020; 38:89-107\n8.\nDivakar, H.\nAsymptomatic uterine fibroids\nBest Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2008; 22:643-654\n9.\nHasselrot, K. ∙ Lindeberg, M. ∙ Konings, P. ...\nInvestigating the loss of work productivity due to symptomatic leiomyoma\nPLoS One. 2018; 13, e0197958\n10.\nde Bruijn, A.M. ∙ Smink, M. ∙ Hehenkamp, W.J.K. ...\nUterine artery embolization for symptomatic adenomyosis: 7-year clinical follow-up using UFS-Qol questionnaire\nCardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2017; 40:1344-1350\n11.\nManagement of symptomatic uterine leiomyomas\nACOG practice bulletin, number 228\nObstet Gynecol. 2021; 137:e100-e115\n12.\nBorah, B.J. ∙ Laughlin-Tommaso, S.K. ∙ Myers, E.R. ...\nAssociation between patient characteristics and treatment procedure among patients with uterine leiomyomas\nObstet Gynecol. 2016; 127:67-77\n13.\nGupta, J.K. ∙ Sinha, A. ∙ Lumsden, M.A. ...\nUterine artery embolization for symptomatic uterine fibroids\nCochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;, CD005073\n14.\nSandberg, E.M. ∙ Tummers, F. ∙ Cohen, S.L. ...\nReintervention risk and quality of life outcomes after uterine-sparing interventions for fibroids: a systematic review and meta-analysis\nFertil Steril. 2018; 109:698-707.e1\n15.\nde Bruijn, A.M. ∙ Ankum, W.M. ∙ Reekers, J.A. ...\nUterine artery embolization vs hysterectomy in the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids: 10-year outcomes from the randomized EMMY trial\nAm J Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 215:745.e1-745.e12\n16.\nWang, C. ∙ Kuban, J.D. ∙ Lee, S.R. ...\nUtilization of endovascular and surgical treatments for symptomatic uterine leiomyomas: a population health perspective\nJ Vasc Interv Radiol. 2020; 31:1552-1559.e1\n17.\nMeier, S.K. ∙ Pollock, B.D. ∙ Kurtz, S.M. ...\nState and government administrative databases: Medicare, National Inpatient Sample (NIS), and State Inpatient Databases (SID) programs\nJ Bone Joint Surg Am. 2022; 104:4-8\n18.\nHouchens, R. ∙ Ross, D. ∙ Elixhauser, A. ...\nNationwide Inpatient Sample redesign final report\nAgency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD, 2014\n19.\nDuclos, A. ∙ Voirin, N.\nThe p-control chart: a tool for care improvement\nInt J Qual Health Care. 2010; 22:402-407\n20.\nMarsh, E.E. ∙ Al-Hendy, A. ∙ Kappus, D. ...\nBurden, prevalence, and treatment of uterine fibroids: a survey of U.S. women\nJ Womens Health (Larchmt). 2018; 27:1359-1367\n21.\nZurawin, R.K. ∙ Fischer, J.H.I.I. ∙ Amir, L.\nThe effect of a gynecologist-interventional radiologist relationship on selection of treatment modality for the patient with uterine myoma\nJ Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010; 17:214-221\n22.\nSpencer, E.B. ∙ Stratil, P. ∙ Mizones, H.\nClinical and periprocedural pain management for uterine artery embolization\nSemin Intervent Radiol. 2013; 30:354-363\n23.\nDuvnjak, S. ∙ Andersen, P.E.\nIntra-arterial lidocaine administration during uterine fibroid embolization to reduce the immediate postoperative pain: a prospective randomized study\nCVIR Endovasc. 2020; 3:10\n24.\nYoon, J. ∙ Valenti, D. ∙ Muchantef, K. ...\nSuperior hypogastric nerve block as post-uterine artery embolization analgesia: a randomized and double-blind clinical trial\nRadiology. 2018; 289:248-254\n25.\nStewart, J.K. ∙ Patetta, M.A. ∙ Burke, C.T.\nSuperior hypogastric nerve block for pain control after uterine artery embolization: effect of addition of steroids on analgesia\nJ Vasc Interv Radiol. 2020; 31:1005-1009.e1\n26.\nLudwig, P.E. ∙ Huff, T.J. ∙ Shanahan, M.M. ...\nPregnancy success and outcomes after uterine fibroid embolization: updated review of published literature\nBr J Radiol. 2020; 93, 20190551\n27.\nMohan, P.P. ∙ Hamblin, M.H. ∙ Vogelzang, R.L.\nUterine artery embolization and its effect on fertility\nJ Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013; 24:925-930\n28.\nMara, M. ∙ Maskova, J. ∙ Fucikova, Z. ...\nMidterm clinical and first reproductive results of a randomized controlled trial comparing uterine fibroid embolization and myomectomy\nCardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2008; 31:73-85\n29.\nZanolli, N.C. ∙ Bishop, K.C. ∙ Kuller, J.A. ...\nFibroids and fertility: a comparison of myomectomy and uterine artery embolization on fertility and reproductive outcomes\nObstet Gynecol Surv. 2022; 77:485-494\n30.\nMcEnteggart, G.E. ∙ Naeem, M. ∙ Skierkowski, D. ...\nReadability of online patient education materials related to IR\nJ Vasc Interv Radiol. 2015; 26:1164-1168\n31.\nHansberry, D.R. ∙ Kraus, C. ∙ Agarwal, N. ...\nHealth literacy in vascular and interventional radiology: a comparative analysis of online patient education resources\nCardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2014; 37:1034-1040\n32.\nTrivedi, P.S. ∙ Guerra, B. ∙ Kumar, V. ...\nHealthcare disparities in interventional radiology\nJ Vasc Interv Radiol. 2022; 33:1459-14567.e1\n33.\nMarchak, K. ∙ Singh, D. ∙ Malavia, M. ...\nA review of healthcare disparities relevant to interventional radiology\nSemin Intervent Radiol. 2023; 40:427-436\n34.\nSolberg, L.I. ∙ Asche, S.E. ∙ Sepucha, K. ...\nInformed choice assistance for women making uterine fibroid treatment decisions: a practical clinical trial\nMed Decis Making. 2010; 30:444-452\n35.\nHarada, T. ∙ Khine, Y.M. ∙ Kaponis, A. ...\nThe impact of adenomyosis on women’s fertility\nObstet Gynecol Surv. 2016; 71:557-568\n36.\nBuggio, L. ∙ Dridi, D. ∙ Barbara, G.\nAdenomyosis: impact on fertility and obstetric outcomes\nReprod Sci. 2021; 28:3081-3084\n37.\nMailli, L. ∙ Patel, S. ∙ Das, R. ...\nUterine artery embolisation: fertility, adenomyosis and size—what is the evidence?\nCVIR Endovasc. 2023; 6:8\n38.\nde Bruijn, A.M. ∙ Lohle, P.N. ∙ Huirne, J.A. ...\nUterine artery embolization versus hysterectomy in the treatment of symptomatic adenomyosis: protocol for the randomized QUESTA trial\nJMIR Res Protoc. 2018; 7:e47\n39.\nStewart, J.K. ∙ Myers, E. ∙ Petrozza, J. ...\nReproductive outcomes of patients undergoing uterine artery embolization for uterine fibroids: proceedings from the Dr. James B. Spies Summit for Uterine Fibroid Research—a society of Interventional Radiology Foundation research consensus panel\nJ Vasc Interv Radiol. 2024; 35:1288-1295","source_license":"public-domain-us","license_restricted":false}