{"paper_id":"8917a78a-21ef-4451-adbd-09bd14baaa0d","body_text":"Zusammenfassung\nMuzinöse Ovarialtumoren stellen die zweithäufigste Gruppe neben den serösen Tumoren dar, wobei die Zystadenome mehr als 80 % ausmachen. Muzinöse Zystadenome, Borderlinetumoren/atypisch proliferierte muzinöse Tumoren und Karzinome unterscheiden sich dabei weder durch die klinische Symptomatik noch durch das durchschnittliche Erkrankungsalter. Borderlinetumoren/atypisch proliferierte muzinöse Tumoren und Karzinome treten typischerweise unilateral im Stadium I auf und haben eine exzellente Prognose. Sie sind häufig Zufallsbefunde oder zeigen eine unspezifische abdominelle Symptomatik. Der Erkrankungsgipfel liegt um das 50. Lebensjahr. Implantate bzw. peritoneale Metastasen sowie Bilateralität eines muzinösen Ovarialtumors sollten den dringenden Verdacht auf eine Metastase eines gastrointestinalen Malignoms nach sich ziehen. Weder eine Mikroinvasion, definiert durch eine Invasion bis max. 5 mm, noch ein intraepitheliales Karzinom, charakterisiert durch hochgradige Atypien, beeinflussen die Prognose von Borderlinetumoren.\nMuzinöse Karzinome zeigen meistens ein konfluentes, drüsiges Wachstumsmuster mit labyrinthartigen Strukturen, während ein destruktives, infiltratives oder gar knotiges histologisches Wachstumsmuster an die Möglichkeit einer Metastase denken lassen sollte. Die seltenen Wandknoten in Borderlinetumoren können einer sarkomartigen spindelzelligen Proliferation, aber auch anaplastischen Karzinomen ähneln, beeinflussen aber meist nicht die Prognose. Immunhistochemisch kann die Abgrenzung insbesondere zu Metastasen aus dem oberen Gastrointestinaltrakt schwierig sein (CK7+ und variable Expression von CK20 sowie CDX2). Pax8-Positivität spricht für ein Primum aus dem Ovar, muss aber nicht gegeben sein. Muzinöse Tumoren in Assoziation mit Teratomen des Ovars ähneln immunhistochemisch Kolontumoren (CK7−/CK20+/CDX2+). Die seltenen endozervikal differenzierten muzinösen Tumoren werden nun als seromuzinöse Tumoren bezeichnet. Sie enthalten 2 und mehr unterschiedliche Zelltypen, sind häufig mit Endometriose assoziiert und scheinen molekulargenetisch den endometrioiden Tumoren verwandt zu sein.\nAbstract\nMucinous ovarian neoplasms represent the second largest group of epithelial ovarian tumors after serous neoplasms, of which benign cystadenomas constitute more than 80 %. Mucinous cystadenomas and carcinomas cannot be distinguished by the clinical features or the mean age of onset of the disease. They typically occur unilaterally, are confined to the adnexae (FIGO stage I) and clinically present with non-specific abdominal symptoms or are diagnosed by chance. The mean age of disease onset is around 50 years old. The prognosis is excellent. Implants, peritoneal metastases and bilateral occurrence of ovarian mucinous neoplasms should lead to the suspicion of metastasis particularly from a gastrointestinal tumor. Neither microinvasion defined as a maximum extent of invasion of 5 mm, nor intraepithelial carcinoma characterized by high grade atypia without invasion, affect the prognosis of mucinous borderline tumors. Mucinous carcinomas typically show confluent glandular, expansile growth that leads to a labyrinth-like pattern. A destructive infiltrative or nodular growth pattern, however, should lead to the consideration of metastasis. Mural nodules that may reveal a spindle cell sarcomatous or anaplastic carcinomatous pattern occur infrequently in mucinous and do not affect the prognosis. Pax8 positivity is indicative of a primary ovarian neoplasm. In this case, however, mucinous tumors associated with teratomas may show the colonic immunoreaction pattern (CK7−/CK20+/CDX2+). The rare mucinous tumors with endocervical differentiation are now designated as seromucinous tumors and consist of two or more distinct cell types, are frequently associated with endometriosis and seem to show a molecular genetic relationship to endometrioid neoplasms.\nSimilar content being viewed by others\nLiteratur\nAnglesio MS, Kommoss S, Tolcher MC et al (2013) Molecular characterization of mucinous ovarian tumours supports a stratified treatment approach with HER2 targeting in 19 % of carcinomas. J Pathol 229:111–120\nBell DA (1991) Mucinous adenofibromas of the ovary. A report of 10 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 15:227–232\nCuatrecasas M, Villanueva A, Matias-Guiu X et al (1997) K-ras mutations in mucinous ovarian tumors: a clinicopathologic and molecular study of 95 cases. Cancer 79:1581–1586\nCzernobilsky B, Dgani R, Roth LM (1983) Ovarian mucinous cystadenocarcinoma with mural nodule of carcinomatous derivation. A light and electron microscopic study. Cancer 51:141–148\nGarrett AP, Lee KR, Colitti CR et al (2001) k-ras mutation may be an early event in mucinous ovarian tumorigenesis. Int J Gynecol Pathol 20:244–251\nHart WR (2005) Mucinous tumors of the ovary: a review. Int J Gynecol Pathol 24:4–25\nKhunamornpong S, Settakorn J, Sukpan K et al (2011) Mucinous tumor of low malignant potential („borderline“ or „atypical proliferative“ tumor) of the ovary: a study of 171 cases with the assessment of intraepithelial carcinoma and microinvasion. Int J Gynecol Pathol 30:218–230\nKim KR, Lee HI, Lee SK et al (2007) Is stromal microinvasion in primary mucinous ovarian tumors with „mucin granuloma“ true invasion? Am J Surg Pathol 31:546–554\nKobel M, Kalloger SE, Huntsman DG et al (2010) Differences in tumor type in low-stage versus high-stage ovarian carcinomas. Int J Gynecol Pathol 29:203–211\nKoskas M, Uzan C, Gouy S et al (2011) Prognostic factors of a large retrospective series of mucinous Borderlinetumors of the ovary (excluding peritoneal pseudomyxoma). Ann Surg Oncol 18:40–48\nKurman RJ, Carcangiu ML, Herrington CS et al (Hrsg) (2014) WHO classification of tumours of female reproductive organs. IARC Press, Lyon\nLaury AR, Perets R, Piao H et al (2011) A comprehensive analysis of PAX8 expression in human epithelial tumors. Am J Surg Pathol 35:816–826\nLee KR, Scully RE (2000) Mucinous tumors of the ovary: a clinicopathologic study of 196 Borderlinetumors (of intestinal type) and carcinomas, including an evaluation of 11 cases with „pseudomyxoma peritonei“. Am J Surg Pathol 24:1447–1464\nLee KR, Young RH (2003) The distinction between primary and metastatic mucinous carcinomas of the ovary: gross and histologic findings in 50 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 27:281–292\nMckenney JK, Soslow RA, Longacre TA (2008) Ovarian mature teratomas with mucinous epithelial neoplasms: morphologic heterogeneity and association with pseudomyxoma peritonei. Am J Surg Pathol 32:645–655\nProvenza C, Young RH, Prat J (2008) Anaplastic carcinoma in mucinous ovarian tumors: a clinicopathologic study of 34 cases emphasizing the crucial impact of stage on prognosis, their histologic spectrum, and overlap with sarcomalike mural nodules. Am J Surg Pathol 32:383–389\nRiopel MA, Ronnett BM, Kurman RJ (1999) Evaluation of diagnostic criteria and behavior of ovarian intestinal-type mucinous tumors: atypical proliferative (borderline) tumors and intraepithelial, microinvasive, invasive, and metastatic carcinomas. Am J Surg Pathol 23:617–635\nRodriguez IM, Irving JA, Prat J (2004) Endocervical-like mucinous Borderlinetumors of the ovary: a clinicopathologic analysis of 31 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 28:1311–1318\nRodriguez IM, Prat J (2002) Mucinous tumors of the ovary: a clinicopathologic analysis of 75 Borderlinetumors (of intestinal type) and carcinomas. Am J Surg Pathol 26:139–152\nRonnett BM, Shmookler BM, Diener-West M et al (1997) Immunohistochemical evidence supporting the appendiceal origin of pseudomyxoma peritonei in women. Int J Gynecol Pathol 16:1–9\nRonnett BM, Shmookler BM, Sugarbaker PH et al (1997) Pseudomyxoma peritonei: new concepts in diagnosis, origin, nomenclature, and relationship to mucinous borderline (low malignant potential) tumors of the ovary. Anat Pathol 2:197–226\nRonnett BM, Yan H, Kurman RJ et al (2001) Patients with pseudomyxoma peritonei associated with disseminated peritoneal adenomucinosis have a significantly more favorable prognosis than patients with peritoneal mucinous carcinomatosis. Cancer 92:85–91\nSeidman JD, Cho KR, Ronnett BM et al (2011) Surface epithelial tumors of the ovary. In: Kurman RJ, Ellenson LH, Ronnett BM (Hrsg) Blaustein’s pathology of the female genital tract. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, S 679–784\nSeidman JD, Khedmati F (2008) Exploring the histogenesis of ovarian mucinous and transitional cell (Brenner) neoplasms and their relationship with Walthard cell nests: a study of 120 tumors. Arch Pathol Lab Med 132:1753–1760\nSeidman JD, Kurman RJ, Ronnett BM (2003) Primary and metastatic mucinous adenocarcinomas in the ovaries: incidence in routine practice with a new approach to improve intraoperative diagnosis. Am J Surg Pathol 27:985–993\nShappell HW, Riopel MA, Smith Sehdev AE et al (2002) Diagnostic criteria and behavior of ovarian seromucinous (endocervical-type mucinous and mixed cell-type) tumors: atypical proliferative (borderline) tumors, intraepithelial, microinvasive, and invasive carcinomas. Am J Surg Pathol 26:1529–1541\nSzych C, Staebler A, Connolly DC et al (1999) Molecular genetic evidence supporting the clonality and appendiceal origin of Pseudomyxoma peritonei in women. Am J Pathol 154:1849–1855\nTanaka H, Kobayashi T, Yoshida K et al (2011) Low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm with disseminated peritoneal adenomucinosis involving the uterus, mimicking primary mucinous endometrial adenocarcinoma: a case report. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 37:1726–1730\nVang R, Gown AM, Barry TS et al (2006) Immunohistochemistry for estrogen and progesterone receptors in the distinction of primary and metastatic mucinous tumors in the ovary: an analysis of 124 cases. Mod Pathol 19:97–105\nVang R, Gown AM, Barry TS et al (2006) Ovarian atypical proliferative (borderline) mucinous tumors: gastrointestinal and seromucinous (endocervical-like) types are immunophenotypically distinctive. Int J Gynecol Pathol 25:83–89\nVang R, Gown AM, Barry TS et al (2006) Cytokeratins 7 and 20 in primary and secondary mucinous tumors of the ovary: analysis of coordinate immunohistochemical expression profiles and staining distribution in 179 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 30:1130–1139\nVang R, Gown AM, Farinola M et al (2007) p16 expression in primary ovarian mucinous and endometrioid tumors and metastatic adenocarcinomas in the ovary: utility for identification of metastatic HPV-related endocervical adenocarcinomas. Am J Surg Pathol 31:653–663\nVang R, Gown AM, Wu LS et al (2006) Immunohistochemical expression of CDX2 in primary ovarian mucinous tumors and metastatic mucinous carcinomas involving the ovary: comparison with CK20 and correlation with coordinate expression of CK7. Mod Pathol 19:1421–1428\nVang R, Gown AM, Zhao C et al (2007) Ovarian mucinous tumors associated with mature cystic teratomas: morphologic and immunohistochemical analysis identifies a subset of potential teratomatous origin that shares features of lower gastrointestinal tract mucinous tumors more commonly encountered as secondary tumors in the ovary. Am J Surg Pathol 31:854–869\nWu CH, Mao TL, Vang R et al (2012) Endocervical-type mucinous Borderlinetumors are related to endometrioid tumors based on mutation and loss of expression of ARID1A. Int J Gynecol Pathol 31:297–303\nYemelyanova AV, Vang R, Judson K et al (2008) Distinction of primary and metastatic mucinous tumors involving the ovary: analysis of size and laterality data by primary site with reevaluation of an algorithm for tumor classification. Am J Surg Pathol 32:128–138\nZaino RJ, Brady MF, Lele SM et al (2011) Advanced stage mucinous adenocarcinoma of the ovary is both rare and highly lethal: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Cancer 117:554–562\nKaern J, Tropé CG, Abeler VM (1993) A retrospective study of 370 borderline tumors of the ovary treated at the Norwegian Radium Hospital from 1970 to 1982. A review of clinicopathologic features and treatment modalities. Cancer 71(5):1810–1820\nSkomedal H, Kristensen GB, Abeler VM et al (1997) TP53 protein accumulation and gene mutation in relation to overexpression of MDM2 protein in ovarian borderline tumours and stage I carcinomas. J Pathol 181(2):158–165\nEinhaltung ethischer Richtlinien\nInteressenkonflikt. S. Lax und A. Staebler geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht. Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.\nAuthor information\nAuthors and Affiliations\nCorresponding author\nRights and permissions\nAbout this article\nCite this article\nLax, S., Staebler, A. Muzinöse Ovarialtumoren. Pathologe 35, 327–335 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00292-014-1912-4\nPublished:\nIssue date:\nDOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00292-014-1912-4","source_license":"public-domain-us","license_restricted":false}