{"paper_id":"7e05030a-6e2f-40b0-9dfb-c71d631f0f9a","body_text":"Abstract\nAdenomyosis is defined as a benign invasion from the endometrium into the myometrium, producing a diffuse increase in the uterus, showing under a microscope non-neoplastic endometrial glands and stroma surrounded by hypertrophic and hyperplastic myometrium [1]. Siegler and Camilien [2] define adenomyosis as the presence of endometrial and corium glandular cells on more than 2.5 mm from the endometrium-myometrium interface.\nAccess this chapter\nTax calculation will be finalised at checkout\nPurchases are for personal use only\nSimilar content being viewed by others\nReferences\nBird CC, McElin TW, Manalo-Estrella P. The elusive adenomyosis of the uterus-revisited. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1972;112:583–93.\nSiegler AM, Camilien L. Adenomyosis. J Reprod Med. 1994;39:841–53.\nBazot M, Cortez A, Emile D, Rouger J, Chopier J, Antonie J, Uzan S. Ultrasonography compared with magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: correlation with histopathology. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:2427–33.\nReinhold C, McCarthy S, Bret PM, et al. Diffuse adenomyosis: comparison of endovaginal US and MR imaging with histopathologic correlation. Radiology. 1996;199:151–8.\nAzziz R. Adenomyosis: Current perspectives. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am. 1989;16:221–35.\nPanganamamula UR, Harmanli OH, Isik-Akbay EF, Grotegut CA, Dandolu V, Gaughan JP. Is prior uterine surgery a risk factor for adenomyosis? Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104:1034–8.\nLee NC, Dicker RC, Rubin GL, Ory HW. Confirmation of the preoperative diagnoses for hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1984;150:283–7.\nKunz G, Beil D, Huppert P, Noe M, Kissler S, Leyendecker G. Adenomyosis in endometriosis prevalence and impact on fertility. Evidence from magnetic resonance imaging. HumReprod. 2005;20:2309–16.\nKunz G, Herbertz M, Beil D, Huppert P, Leyendecker G. Adenomyosis as a disorder of the early and late human reproductive period. Reprod BioMed Online. 2007;15:681–5.\nBazot M, Darai E, Hourani R, Thomassin I, Cortez A, Uzan S, Buy JN. Deep pelvic endometriosis: MR imaging for diagnosis and prediction of extension of disease. Radiology. 2004;232:379–89.\nBrosens JJ, de Souza NM, Barker FG, Paraschos T, Winston RM. Endovaginal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of adenomyosis uteri: identifying the predictive characteristics. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995;102:471–4.\nBazot M, Dara E, Rouger J, Detchev R, Cortez A, Uzan S. Limitations of transvaginal sonography for the diagnosis of adenomyosis, with histopathological correlation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002;20:603–11.\nKeepek K, Tuncay YA, Goynumer G, Tutai E. Transvaginal sonography in the diagnosis of adenomyosis: which findings are most accurate? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;30(3):314–5.\nTogashi K, Ozasa H, Konishi I, et al. Enlarged uterus: differentiation between adenomyosis and leiomyoma with MR imaging. Radiology. 1989;171:531–4.\nTamai K, Koyama T, Umeoka S, Saga T, Fujii S, Togashi K. Spectrum of MR features in adenomyosis. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;20:583–602.\nAtri M, Reinhold C, Mehio AR, Chapman WB, Bret PM. Adenomyosis: US features with histologic correlation in an in-vitro study. Radiology. 2000;215:783–90.\nChopra S, Lev-Toaff AS, Ors F, Bergin D. Adenomyosis: common and uncommon manifestations on sonography and resonance imaging. J Ultrasound Med. 2006;25(5):617–27.\nHricak H, Alpers C, Crooks LE, Sheldon PE. Magnetic resonance imaging of the female pelvis: initial experience. AJR. 1983;141:1119–28.\nDueholm M, Lundorf E, Hansen ES, Sorensen JS, Ledertoug S, Olesen F. Magnetic resonance imaging and transvaginal ultrasonography for the diagnosis of adenomyosis. Fertil Steril. 2001;76:588–94.\nReinhold C, Atri M, Mehio A, et al. Diffuse uterine adenomyosis: morphologic criteria and diagnostic accuracy of endovaginal sonography. Radiology. 1995;197:609–14.\nFedele L, Bianchi S, Dorta M, Arcaini L, Zanotti F, Carinelli S. Transvaginal sonography in the diagnosis of diffuse adenomyosis. Fertil Steril. 1992;58:94–7.\nBotsis D, Kassanos D, Antoniou G, Pyrgiotis E, Karakitsos P, Kalogirou D. Adenomyoma and leiomyoma: differential diagnosis with transvaginal sonography. J Clin Ultrasound. 1998;26:21–5.\nBatzer FR, Hansen L. Bizarre sonographic appearance of an adenomyoma and its presentation. J Ultrasound Med. 1996;15:599–602.\nFedele L, Bianchi S, Dorta M, Zanotti F, Brioschi D, Carinelli S. Transvaginal ultrasonography in the differential diagnosis of adenomyoma and leiomyoma. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;167:603–6.\nAuthor information\nAuthors and Affiliations\nCorresponding author\nEditor information\nEditors and Affiliations\nRights and permissions\nCopyright information\n© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland\nAbout this chapter\nCite this chapter\nDe Nicola, A.L.A., de Souza, L.R.M.F. (2017). Adenomyosis. In: de Souza, L., De Nicola, A., De Nicola, H. (eds) Atlas of Imaging in Infertility. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13893-0_7\nDownload citation\nDOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13893-0_7\nPublished:\nPublisher Name: Springer, Cham\nPrint ISBN: 978-3-319-13892-3\nOnline ISBN: 978-3-319-13893-0\neBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)\nKeywords\nThese keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.","source_license":"CC0","license_restricted":false}