{"paper_id":"7d4289ba-d5eb-47e3-9bbf-a35ad5bc4203","body_text":"Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 March 2009\nMenorrhagia, or heavy regular menstrual bleeding, represents a major health burden to women. Trials comparing abdominal hysterectomy (AH) with transcervical resection of the endometrium (TCRE) for the condition have shown that, although the duration and severity of convalescence is less with TCRE, AH produces a permanent solution to heavy bleeding while TCRE fails in a proportion of women by 2 years. However, by 2 years, TCRE costs only 71% that of AH. This paper presents a cost-utility analysis to assess which procedure is more cost-effective overall. Under most plausible parameter values and on the basis of health state values elicited from a sample of women with menorrhagia, AH is likely to be considered more cost-effective than TCRE if purchasers are willing to pay an additional cost of at least £6,500 per extra quality-adjusted life-year generated by AH.\n- Type\n- General Essays\n- Information\n- International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 14 , Issue 2 , Spring 1998 , pp. 302 - 319\n- Copyright\n- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1998\n1.Bradlow, J., Coulter, A., & Brooks, P.Patterns of referral, Oxford. Oxford: Health Services Research Unit, 1992.Google Scholar\n2.Bridgman, S. A.Increasing operative rates for dysfunctional uterine bleeding after endometrial ablation [letter]. Lancet, 1994, 344, 893.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\n3.Briggs, A., Sculpher, M. J., & Buxton, M.Uncertainty in the economic evaluation of health care technologies: The role of sensitivity analysis. Health Economics, 1994, 3, 95–104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\n4.Brooks, R.EuroQol: The current state of play. Health Policy, 1996, 37, 53–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\n5.Brown, J., & Sculpher, M. J.Economics of screening programs to prevent cervical cancer. Contemporary Reviews in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1993, 5, 221–229.Google Scholar\n6.Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy (CIPFA). Health service trends, vol. 2—Detailed tables. London: Health Care Financial Management Association, 1990.Google Scholar\n7.Clarke, A., Black, N., Rowe, P., et al. Indications for and outcome of total abdominal hysterectomy for benign disease: A prospective cohort study. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1995, 102, 611–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\n8.Coulter, A., Kelland, J., Peto, V., et al. Treating menorrhagia in primary care: An overview of drug trials and a survery of prescribing practice. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1995, 11, 456–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar\n9.Coulter, A., Peto, V., & Doll, H.Patients' preferences and general practitioners' decisions in the treatment of menstrual disorders. Family Practice, 1994, 11, 67–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\n10.Coulter, A., Peto, V., & Jenkinson, C.Quality of life and patient satisfaction following treatment for menorrhagia. Family Practice, 1994, 11, 394–401.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\n11.Daly, E., Gray, A., Barlow, D., et al. Measuring the impact of menopausal symptoms on quality of life. British Medical Journal, 1993, 307, 836–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\n12.Dicker, R. C., Greenspan, J. R., Strauss, L. T., et al. Complications of abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy among women of reproductive age in the United States. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1982, 144, 841–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\n13.Drummond, M. F., Brandt, A., Luce, B., et al. Standardizing methodologies for economic evaluation in health care. Internationa/Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1993, 9, 26–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\n14.Drummond, M. F., Mason, J., Torrance, G.Cost-effectiveness league tables: Think of the fans. Health Policy, 1995, 31, 231–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\n15.Dwyer, N., Hutton, J., & Stirrat, G. M.Randomized controlled trial comparing endometrial resection with abdominal hysterectomy for the surgical treatment of menorrhagia. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1993, 100, 237–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\n16.Effective Health Care. The management of menorrhagia: Effective Health Care Bulletin No. 9. Leeds: Nuffield Institute for Health, University of Leeds, 1995.Google Scholar\n17.Froberg, D. G., & Kane, R. L.Methodology for measuring health-state preferences, I: Measurement strategies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1989, 42, 345–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\n18.Furlong, W., Feeny, D., Torrance, G. W., et al. Guide to design and development of health-state utility instrumentation, CHEPA Working Paper No.90–9, Hamilton, Ontario: CHEPA, McMaster University, 1990.Google Scholar\n19.Gannon, M. J., Holt, E. M., Fairbank, J., et al. A randomized trial comparing endometrial resection and abdominal hysterectomy for the treatment of menorrhagia. British Medical Journal, 1991, 303, 1362–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\n20.Gath, D., Osborn, M., Bungay, G., et al. Psychiatric disorder and gynaecological symptoms in middle aged women: A community survey. British Medical Journal, 1987, 294, 213–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\n21.Gerard, K., Dobson, M., & Hall, J.Framing and labelling effects in health descriptions: Quality adjusted life years for treatment of breast cancer. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1993, 46, 77–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\n22.Gerard, K., & Mooney, G.QALY league tables: Handle with care. Health Economics, 1993, 2, 59–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\n23.Hospital episode statistics, vol. 1: Finished consultant episodes by diagnosis, operation and specialty. London: HMSO, 1995.Google Scholar\n24.Jenkinson, C., Peto, V., & Coulter, A.Measuring change over time: A comparison of results from a global single item of health status and the multi-dimensional SF-36 health status survey questionnaire in patients presenting with menorrhagia. Quality of Life Research, 1994, 3, 317–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar\n25.Johnnesson, M.The ranking properties of healthy-years equivalents and quality-adjusted life-years under certainty and uncertainty. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1995, 11, 40–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar\n26.Krabbe, P. F. M., Essink-Bot, M. L., & Bonsel, G. J.On the equivalence of collectively and individually collected responses: Standard gamble and time trade-off judgements of health states. Medical Decision Making, 1996, 16, 120–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar\n27.Laupacis, A., Feeny, D., Detsky, A. S., et al. How attractive does a new technology have to be to warrant adoption and utilization? Tentative guidelines for using clinical and economic evaluations. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 1992, 146, 473–81.Google ScholarPubMed\n28.Llewellyn-Thomas, H., Sutherland, H. J., Tibshirani, R., et al. Describing health states: Methodologic issue in obtaining values for health states. Medical Care, 1984, 22, 543–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\n29.Loomes, G., & McKenzie, L.The use of QALYs in health care decision making. Social Science and Medicine, 1989, 28, 299–308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\n30.Maynard, A.Developing the health care market. Economic Journal, 1991,101,1277–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar\n31.McNeil, B. J., Pauker, S. G., Sox, H. C., et al. On the elicitation of preferences for alternative therapies. New England Journal of Medicine, 1982, 306, 1259–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\n32.Mehrez, A., & Gafni, A.Quality-adjusted life years, utility theory and healthy-years equivalents. Medical Decision Making, 1989, 9, 142–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\n33.Mohide, E. A., Torrance, G. W., Streiner, D. L., et al. Measuring the well-being of family caregivers using the time trade-off technique. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1988, 41, 475–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\n34.O'Connor, A. M. C., Boyd, N. F., Warde, P., et al. Eliciting preferences for alternative drug therapies in oncology: Influence of treatment outcome description, elicitation technique and treatment experience on preferences. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 1987, 40, 811–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\n36.Peto, V., Coulter, A., & Bond, A.Factors affecting general practitioners’ recruitment of patients into a prospective study. Family Practice, 1993, 10, 207–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\n37.Pinion, S. B., Parkin, D. E., & Abramovich, D. R.Randomized trial of hysterectomy, endometrial laser ablation and transcervical endometrial resection for dysfunctional uterine bleeding. British Medical Journal, 1994, 309, 979–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\n38.Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (RCOG) Medical Audit Unit. Fifth bulletin: MISTLETOE report. Manchester: RCOG Medical Audit Unit, 1995.Google Scholar\n39.Sculpher, M. J., Bryan, S., Dwyer, N., et al. An economic evaluation of transcervical endometrial resection versus abdominal hysterectomy for the treatment of menorrhagia. British Journal of Obstretrics and Gynecology, 1993, 100, 244–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\n40.Sculpher, M. J., Dwyer, N., Byford, S., et al. Randomized trial comparing hysterectomy and transcervical endometrial resection: Effect on health-related quality of life and costs two years after surgery. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1996, 103, 142–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\n41.Sculpher, M. J., Michaels, J., McKenna, M., et al. A cost-utility analysis of laser-assisted angioplasty for peripheral arterial occlusions. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1996, 12, 104–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\n42.Siddle, N., Sarrel, P., & Whitehead, M.The effect of hysterectomy on the age at ovarian failure: Identification of a subgroup of women with premature loss of ovarian function and literature review. Fertility and Sterility, 1987, 47, 94–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\n43.Torrance, G. W.Utility approach to measuring health—related quality of life. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 1987, 40, 593–600.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\n44.Torrance, G. W.Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal—A review. Journal of Health Economics, 1986, 5, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar\n45.Torrance, G. W., Thomas, W. H., & Sackett, D. L. A utility maximisation model for evaluation of health care programs. Health Services Research, 1972, 118–33.Google Scholar\n46.Vessey, M. P., Villard-Mackintosh, L., McPherson, K., et al. The epidemiology of hysterectomy: Findings in a large cohort study. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1992, 99, 402–07.CrossRefGoogle Scholar\n47.Williams, A. The measurement and valuation of health: A chronicle. Center for Health Economics Discussion Paper 136, York: CHE, University of York, 1995.Google Scholar\n- 38\n- Cited by\nCited by\nCrossref Citations\nFattore, Giovanni\nand\nLazzaro, C.\n1999.\nAnalisi dei costi del trattamento della menorragia: un confronto tra isterectomia, ablazione endometriale e un sistema intrauterino di rilascio di levonorgestrel (Mirena).\nPharmacoEconomics Italian Research Articles,\nVol. 1,\nIssue. 1,\np.\n1.\nLethaby, Anne\nShepperd, Sasha\nFarquhar, Cindy\nCooke, Inez\nand\nLethaby, Anne\n1999.\nCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.\nSUBAK, LESLEE L.\nand\nCAUGHEY, AARON B.\n2000.\nMeasuring Cost-Effectiveness of Surgical Procedures.\nClinical Obstetrics and Gynecology,\nVol. 43,\nIssue. 3,\np.\n551.\nSculpher, Mark\nand\nGafni, Amiram\n2001.\nRecognizing diversity in public preferences: The use of preference sub‐groups in cost‐effectiveness analysis.\nHealth Economics,\nVol. 10,\nIssue. 4,\np.\n317.\nPanoskaltsis, Theodore A.\nBassett, Paul A.\nand\nFrappell, Jonathan M.\n2002.\nTranscervical endometrial resection in 197 women. Hysterectomy rate and associated risk factors after a 5–8‐year follow‐up period.\nGynaecological Endoscopy,\nVol. 11,\nIssue. 2-3,\np.\n99.\nDickersin, Kay\nMunro, Malcolm\nLangenberg, Patricia\nScherer, Roberta\nFrick, Kevin D\nWeber, Anne M\nJohns, Alan\nPeipert, Jeffrey F\nand\nClark, Melissa\n2003.\nSurgical treatments outcomes project for dysfunctional uterine bleeding (STOP-DUB): design and methods.\nControlled Clinical Trials,\nVol. 24,\nIssue. 5,\np.\n591.\nGarside, Ruth\nStein, Ken\nWyatt, Katrina\nRound, Ali\nand\nPitt, Martin\n2004.\nA cost–utility analysis of microwave and thermal balloon endometrial ablation techniques for the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding.\nBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology,\nVol. 111,\nIssue. 10,\np.\n1103.\nvan der Wilt, Gert Jan\nMeulendijks, Carina F.M.\nand\nThijssen, Robbert F.A.\n2005.\nExperience with shared decision making in gynaecological practice: treatment decisions in patients with dysfunctional uterine blood loss.\nEuropean Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology,\nVol. 120,\nIssue. 2,\np.\n210.\nYou, Joyce H.S.\nSahota, Daljit Singh\nand\nMoYuen, Pong\n2006.\nA cost-utility analysis of hysterectomy, endometrial resection and ablation and medical therapy for menorrhagia.\nHuman Reproduction,\nVol. 21,\nIssue. 7,\np.\n1878.\nCritchley, Hilary O.D.\nRobertson, Kevin A.\nForster, Thorsten\nHenderson, Teresa A.\nWilliams, Alistair R.W.\nand\nGhazal, Peter\n2006.\nGene expression profiling of mid to late secretory phase endometrial biopsies from women with menstrual complaint.\nAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology,\nVol. 195,\nIssue. 2,\np.\n406.\nLiu, Zhimei\nDoan, Quan V.\nBlumenthal, Paul\nand\nDubois, Robert W.\n2007.\nA Systematic Review Evaluating Health-Related Quality of Life, Work Impairment, and Health-Care Costs and Utilization in Abnormal Uterine Bleeding.\nValue in Health,\nVol. 10,\nIssue. 3,\np.\n183.\nZowall, H\nCairns, JA\nBrewer, C\nLamping, DL\nGedroyc, WMW\nand\nRegan, L\n2008.\nCost‐effectiveness of magnetic resonance‐guided focused ultrasound surgery for treatment of uterine fibroids.\nBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology,\nVol. 115,\nIssue. 5,\np.\n653.\nYou, Joyce H.S.\nSahota, Daljit Singh\nand\nYuen, Pong Mo\n2009.\nUterine artery embolization, hysterectomy, or myomectomy for symptomatic uterine fibroids: a cost-utility analysis.\nFertility and Sterility,\nVol. 91,\nIssue. 2,\np.\n580.\nKilonzo, Mary M.\nSambrook, Alison M.\nCook, Jonathan A.\nCampbell, Marion K.\nand\nCooper, Kevin G.\n2010.\nA Cost-Utility Analysis of Microwave Endometrial Ablation versus Thermal Balloon Endometrial Ablation.\nValue in Health,\nVol. 13,\nIssue. 5,\np.\n528.\nLete, I.\nCristóbal, I.\nFebrer, L.\nCrespo, C.\nArbat, A.\nHernández, F.J.\nand\nBrosa, M.\n2011.\nEconomic evaluation of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system for the treatment of dysfunctional uterine bleeding in Spain.\nEuropean Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology,\nVol. 154,\nIssue. 1,\np.\n71.\nFergusson, Rosalie J\nLethaby, Anne\nShepperd, Sasha\nand\nFarquhar, Cindy\n2013.\nEndometrial resection and ablation versus hysterectomy for heavy menstrual bleeding.\nCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews,\nSanghera, Sabina\nFrew, Emma\nKai, Joe\nGupta, Janesh\nand\nElizabeth Roberts, Tracy\n2013.\nAn assessment of economic measures used in menorrhagia: A systematic review.\nSocial Science & Medicine,\nVol. 98,\nIssue. ,\np.\n149.\nWasiak, Radoslaw\nFilonenko, Anna\nVanness, David J.\nLaw, Amy\nJeddi, Mark\nWittrup-Jensen, Kim U.\nStull, Donald E.\nSiak, Steven\nand\nJensen, Jeffrey T.\n2013.\nImpact of Estradiol Valerate/Dienogest on Work Productivity and Activities of Daily Living in Women with Heavy Menstrual Bleeding.\nJournal of Women's Health,\nVol. 22,\nIssue. 4,\np.\n378.\nWymer, Kevin M.\nShih, Ya-Chen Tina\nand\nPlunkett, Beth A.\n2014.\nThe cost-effectiveness of a trial of labor accrues with multiple subsequent vaginal deliveries.\nAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology,\nVol. 211,\nIssue. 1,\np.\n56.e1.\nPynnä, Kristiina\nVuorela, Piia\nLodenius, Leena\nPaavonen, Jorma\nRoine, Risto P.\nand\nRäsänen, Pirjo\n2014.\nCost‐effectiveness of hysterectomy for benign gynecological conditions: a systematic review.\nActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica,\nVol. 93,\nIssue. 3,\np.\n225.","source_license":"CC0","license_restricted":false}