{"paper_id":"7c3e3d2b-d3cd-4731-8e72-24a59db5fa07","body_text":"Abstract\nOvarian tumors like most other gynecological conditions like endometriosis, leiomyoma, PID, etc. are known to throw surprises on the operating table. Before posting a patient with an ovarian tumor for surgery, one has to keep in mind that the tumor could be benign, borderline, or malignant. Borderline ovarian tumors are not premalignant tumors, but a separate category of ovarian tumors with a unique behavior of their own. They have an excellent prognosis even when advanced. A successful surgery for ovarian tumors depends a lot on a thorough preoperative workup, and in many cases the benign, borderline, or the malignant nature of the tumor is confirmed only after receiving the frozen section report. The surgery that needs to be performed, in many cases depends on the frozen section report. In contrast, the surgery to be performed for a case of endometriosis, leiomyoma, PID, etc. is straightforward and depends on the patient’s age and fertility issues. This may not be the case in cases of ovarian tumors—the patient may be a young nulligravida with a suspected benign tumor, but the frozen section may reveal an aggressive malignancy. The important points to be kept in mind while operating on ovarian tumors are\n-\nAny intraoperative spillage of an early stage malignancy results in upstaging of the disease, and this can be very significant in the overall prognosis of young patients who have a long life ahead.\n-\nA complete staging is essential. If proper staging is missed, then it has a bearing on the subsequent management and overall prognosis of the disease.\n-\nAvailability of frozen section during surgery is very important since it has a bearing on what surgery needs to be performed.\nAnother important point that has to be kept in mind before planning to operate on a patient with ovarian tumor is that the disease load can be huge with extensive involvement of abdominal organs, but the ovarian tumor itself could be relatively small. Conversely, a patient with abdominal pain and distention could have metastatic ovarian tumor with the primary malignancy not being overtly symptomatic.\nAccess this chapter\nTax calculation will be finalised at checkout\nPurchases are for personal use only\nSimilar content being viewed by others\nReferences\nSaha S, Robertson M. Meigs’ and pseudo-Meigs’ syndrome. Australas J Ultrasound Med. 2012;15(1):29–31.\nHauptmann S, Friedrich K, Redline R, Avril S. Ovarian borderline tumors in the 2014 WHO classification: evolving concepts and diagnostic criteria. Virchows Arch. 2017;470(2):125–42.\nHatami H, Mohsenifar Z, Alavi SN. The diagnostic accuracy of frozen section compared to permanent section: a single center study in Iran. Iran J Pathol. 2015;10(4):295–9.\nAl-Agha OM, Nicastri AD. An in-depth look at Krukenberg tumor: an overview. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2006;130(11):1725–30.\nWu F, et al. Clinical characteristics and prognostic analysis of Krukenberg tumor. Mol Clin Oncol. 2015;3(6):1323–8.\nMenczer J, Ben-Shem E, Golan A, Levy T. The significance of normal pretreatment levels of CA125 (<35 U/mL) in epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Rambam Maimonides Med J. 2015;6(1):e0005.\nMalati T, Kumari RG, Yadagiri B. Application of tumor markers in ovarian malignancies. Indian J Clin Biochem. 2001;16(2):224–33.\nBacalbasa N, Stoica C, Mirea G, Belescu I. Endometrial carcinoma associated with ovarian granulosa cell tumors—a case report. Anticancer Res. 2015;35(10):5547–50.\nAyhan A, Salman MC, Velipasaoglu M, Sakinci M, Yuce K. Prognostic factors in adult granulosa cell tumors of the ovary: a retrospective analysis of 80 cases. J Gynecol Oncol. 2009;20(3):158–63.\nKorkmazer E, Solak N, Tokgoz VY. Assessment of thickened endometrium in tamoxifen therapy. Turk J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;11(4):215–8.\nRamljak V, Muhaxhiri MA, Kelcec IV. Cytology in diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Libri Oncol. 2015;43(1–3):33–9.\nHuang C, Hong M, Ding D. A review of ovary torsion. Ci Ji Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2017;29(3):143–7.\nBurks FN, Santucci RA. Management of iatrogenic ureteral injury. Ther Adv Urol. 2014;6(3):115–24.\nvan Ramshorst GH, et al. Abdominal wound dehiscence in adults: development and validation of a risk model. World J Surg. 2010;34(1):20–7.\nRema P, Ahmed I. Fertility sparing surgery in gynecologic cancer. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2014;64(4):234–8.\nFiechtinger M, Rodriguez-Wallberg KA. Fertility preservation in women with cervical, endometrial or ovarian cancers. Gynecol Oncol Res Pract. 2016;3:8.\nBouchard-Fortier G, Kim RH, Allen L, Gupta A, May T. Fertility-sparing surgery for the management of young women with embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma of the cervix: a case series. Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2016;18:4–7.\nBandyopadhyay A, Chakraborty J, Chowdhury AR, Bhattacharya A, Bhattachrya P, Chowdhury MK. Fine needle aspiration cytology of ovarian tumors with histological correlation. J Cytol. 2012;29(1):35–40.\nMathur SR. Ovarian cancer: role of cytology. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol. 2007;27(Suppl 1).\nAuthor information\nAuthors and Affiliations\nRights and permissions\nCopyright information\n© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.\nAbout this chapter\nCite this chapter\nPodder, A.R., Seshadri, J.G. (2020). Ovarian Tumor: Challenges During Surgery. In: Atlas of Difficult Gynecological Surgery. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8173-7_5\nDownload citation\nDOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8173-7_5\nPublished:\nPublisher Name: Springer, Singapore\nPrint ISBN: 978-981-13-8172-0\nOnline ISBN: 978-981-13-8173-7\neBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)","source_license":"CC0","license_restricted":false}