{"paper_id":"78f09f7d-be3c-4f9a-a258-a146fc96d1dc","body_text":"Abstract\nProximal tubal disease accounts for 10 ~ 25 % of tubal infertility. The underlying causes of tubal damage include pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), pelvic and abdominal surgery or endometriosis. Hysteroscopy and laparoscopy with chromopertubation (HLC) is considered as the “gold standard” for evaluating the integrity of the uterine cavity and for establishing tubal status. There are two treatment options for proximal tubal disease, namely, tubal surgery and in-vitro fertilisation (IVF). The success of surgical treatment depends on careful selection of cases. Tubal cannulation should be attempted prior to tubal anastomosis. Laparoscopy guided hysteroscopic tubal cannulation (LHTC) in women with proximal tubal block produces encouraging results regardless of whether one or both tubes are blocked. The overall pregnancy rate of LHTC is around 38 %. In women with proximal tubal block, LHTC and IVF are both effective treatment options.\nAccess this chapter\nTax calculation will be finalised at checkout\nPurchases are for personal use only\nSimilar content being viewed by others\nReferences\nSwart P, Mol BW, van der Veen F, van Beurden M, Redekop WK, Bossuyt PM. The accuracy of hysterosalpingography in the diagnosis of tubal pathology: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 1995;64:486–91.\nSulak PJ, Letterie GS, Coddington CC, Hayslip CC, Woodward JE, Klein TA. Histology of proximal tubal occlusion. Fertil Steril. 1987;48:437–40.\nNational Institute for Clinical Excellence. Fertility: assessment and treatment for people with fertility problems. In: Clinical guideline. London: NICE; 2004.\nSaunders RD, Shwayder JM, Nakajima ST. Current methods of tubal patency assessment. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(7):2171–9.\nWatrelot A, Dreyfus JM, Andine JP. Evaluation of the performance of fertiloscopy in 160 consecutive infertile patients with no obvious pathology. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:707–11.\nDarai E, Dessolee L, Lecuru F, Soriano D. Transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy compared with laparoscopy for the evaluation of infertile women: a prospective comparative blind study. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:2379–82.\nSowa M, Shimamoto T, Nakano R, Sato M, Yamada R. Diagnosis and treatment of proximal tubal obstruction by fluoroscopic transcervical fallopian tube catheterization. Hum Reprod. 1993;8:1711–4.\nThompson KA, Kiltz RJ, Koci T, Cabus ET, Kletzky OA. Transcervical fallopian tube catheterization and recanalization for proximal tubal obstruction. Fertil Steril. 1994;61:243–7.\nWoolcott R, Petchpud A, O'Donnell P, Stanger J. Differential impact on pregnancy rate of selective salpingography, tubal catheterization and wire-guide recanalization in the treatment of proximal Fallopian tube obstruction. Hum Reprod. 1995;10:1423–6.\nBa SD, Badiane M, Ba AA, Niang EH, Ba AL, Agaicha A. Selective salpingography in the treatment of infertility caused by proximal tubal obstruction: apropos of 122 cases treated in Dakar. Sante. 1999;9:81–4.\nAtallah N, Karam R. Selective salpingography and transcervical tubal recanalization: technique, indications, results. Apropos of 53 proceedings. J Med Liban. 1999;47:154–8.\nPapaioannou S, Afnan M, Girling AJ, Coomarasamy A, Ola B, Olufowobi O, McHugo JM, Hammadieh N, Sharif K. Long-term fertility prognosis following selective salpingography and tubal catheterization in women with proximal tubal blockage. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:2325–30.\nHayashi M, Hoshimoto K, Ohkura T. Successful conception following Fallopian tube recanalization in infertile patients with a unilateral proximally occluded tube and a contralateral patent tube. Hum Reprod. 2003;18:96–9.\nRawal N, Haddad N, Abbott GT. Selective salpingography and fallopian tube recanalisation: experience from a district general hospital. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;25:586–8.\nAl-Jaroudi D, Herba MJ, Tulandi T. Reproductive performance after selective tubal catheterization. J Minim Invas Gyn. 2005;12:150–2.\nVerma A, Krarup K, Donuru A. Selective salpingography and fallopian tube catheterisation by guidewire. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;29:315–7.\nAnil G, Tay KH, Loh SF, Yong TT, Ong CL, Tan BS. Fluoroscopy-guided, transcervical, selective salpingography and fallopian tube recanalisation. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2011;31:746–50.\nCobellis L, Argano F, Castaldi MA, Acone G, Mele D, Signoriello G, Colacurci N. Selective salpingography: preliminary experience of an office operative option for proximal tubal recanalization. Eur J Obstet Gyn R B. 2012;163:62–6.\nSakumoto T, Shinkawa T, Izena H, Sakugawa M, Takamiyagi N, Inafuku K, Kanazawa K. Treatment of infertility associated with endometriosis by selective tubal catheterization under hysteroscopy and laparoscopy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993;169:744–7.\nAllahbadia GN, Mangeshikar P, Dhungat PBP, Desai SK, Gudi AA, Arya A. Hysteroscopic fallopian tube recanalization using a flexible guide cannula and hydrophilic guide wire. Gynaecol Endosc. 2000;9:31–5.\nDas S, Nardo LG, Seif MW. Proximal tubal disease: the place for tubal cannulation. Reprod Biomed Online. 2007;15:383–8.\nMekaru K, Yagi C, Asato K, Masamoto H, Sakumoto K, Aoki Y. Hysteroscopic tubal catheterization under laparoscopy for proximal tubal obstruction. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011;284:1573–6.\nChung Jacqueline PW, Haines CJ, Kong Grace WS. Long-term reproductive outcome after hysteroscopic proximal tubal cannulation-an outcome analysis. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012;52:470–5.\nSpiewankiewicz B, Stelmachow J. Hysteroscopic tubal catheterization in diagnosis and treatment of proximal oviductal obstruction. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 1995;22:23–7.\nRahimunnisa S, Tanwar R, Prasad S. Ultrasound versus tactile cannulation in the treatment of proximal tubal obstruction. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2009;106:216–7.\nTomazevic T, et al. Microsurgery and in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer for infertility resulting from pathological proximal tubal blockage. Hum Reprod. 1996;11:2613–7.\nHou HY, Chen YQ, Li TC, Hu CX, Chen X, Yang ZH. Outcome of laparoscopy guided hysteroscopic tubal catheterization for infertility due to proximal tubal obstruction. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014;21(2):272–8.\nMol BW, Collins JA, Burrows EA, van der Veen F, Bossuyt PM. Comparison of hysterosalpingography and laparoscopy in predicting fertility outcome. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:1237–42.\nTanaka Y, Tajima H, Sakuraba S, Shimokawa R, Kamei K. Renaissance of surgical recanalization for proximal fallopian tubal occlusion: falloposcopic tuboplasty as a promising therapeutic option in tubal infertility. J Minim Invas Gyn. 2011;18:651–9.\nTanaka Y, Tajima H. Falloposcopic tuboplasty as an option for tubal infertility: an alternative to in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(1):441–3.\nMoon HS, Joo BS, Park GS, Moon SE, Kim SG, Koo JS. High pregnancy rate after microsurgical tubal reanastomosis by temporary loose parallel 4-quadrant sutures technique: a long long-term follow-up report on 961 cases. Hum Reprod. 2012;27(6):1657–62.\nDubuisson JB, Chapron C, Ansquer Y, Vancher-Lavenu MC. Proximal tubal occlusion: is there an alternative to microsurgery? Hum Reprod. 1997;12(4):692–8.\nRansom M, Garcia A. Surgical management of cornual-isthmic tubal obstruction. Fertil Steril. 1997;68:887–91.\nDas K, Nagel T, Malo J. Hysteroscopic cannulation for proximal tubal obstruction: a change for the better? Fertil Steril. 1995;63:1009–15.\nAuthor information\nAuthors and Affiliations\nCorresponding author\nEditor information\nEditors and Affiliations\nRights and permissions\nCopyright information\n© 2015 Springer-Verlag London\nAbout this chapter\nCite this chapter\nChen, Y.Q., Hou, H.Y., Li, TC. (2015). Proximal Tubal Disease. In: Metwally, M., Li, TC. (eds) Reproductive Surgery in Assisted Conception. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4953-8_2\nDownload citation\nDOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4953-8_2\nPublisher Name: Springer, London\nPrint ISBN: 978-1-4471-4952-1\nOnline ISBN: 978-1-4471-4953-8\neBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)","source_license":"CC0","license_restricted":false}