{"paper_id":"7161d545-46e9-477c-94cd-fae5bf866551","body_text":"Abstract\nThis chapter interrogates the long-standing assumption that chronic pain, particularly gynecological pain, cannot be communicated. Drawing from feminist disability studies, rhetorical theory, and trauma studies, the chapter challenges foundational thinkers like Elaine Scarry and Ludwig Wittgenstein who frame pain as inherently inexpressible. Instead, it argues that endometriosis pain communicates through embodied rhetoric that defies traditional, logocentric language. Using Jay Dolmage’s concept of mētis and Remi Yergeau’s theory of disability as a narrative condition, the chapter asserts that pain speaks not in spite of its illegibility but because of it. By analyzing patient-generated texts such as The Pain Dictionary and survey responses from advocacy organizations, the chapter contends that individuals with endometriosis forge shared linguistic meaning through metaphor, sensation, and community storytelling. These narratives reject the clinical impulse to dismiss pain as “all in one’s head” and instead reframe it as an act of resistance against medical misogyny and ableism. The chapter ultimately repositions endometriosis not as a failure of language, but as a demand for new rhetorical paradigms: ones that validate pain as a legitimate, epistemologically rich form of knowledge. Through this framework, feminist disability rhetoric emerges as a crucial methodology for understanding chronic pelvic pain and reclaiming agency.\nAccess this chapter\nTax calculation will be finalised at checkout\nPurchases are for personal use only\nSimilar content being viewed by others\nNotes\n- 1.\nThis will be particularly important when discussing the literature of endometriosis in the final chapters, where I argue that using language and writing are integral to creating change for women and people of color within the medical system.\n- 2.\nPlease see Denial and Anger for more on this history.\n- 3.\nDolmage’s mētis is distinct from the Métis Nation of Ontario. The Métis Nation was established in 1993 in order to proclaim self-governance and focus on “nation-building” as a collective. They also strive to preserve Métis culture and improve the quality of life of Métis children (“The Métis Nation of Ontario”).\nReferences\nBiss, Eula. 2007. The pain scale. Creative Nonfiction 32:65–84.\nBullo, Stella. 2018. Exploring disempowerment in women’s accounts of endometriosis experiences. Discourse & Communication 12 (6): 569–586.\nBullo, Stella. 2019. “I feel like I am being stabbed by a thousand tiny men”: The challenges of communicating endometriosis pain. Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine 24:1–17.\nCleghorn, Elinor. 2021. Unwell women: Misdiagnosis and myth in a man-made world. New York: Penguin.\nCohen, Milton, and John Quinter. 2019. Is “chronic pain” a meaningful diagnosis? In Meanings of pain, ed. Simon van Rysewyk, vol. 2, 249–260. Cham: Springer Nature.\nDahlhamer, James, Jacqueline Lucas, Carla Zelaya, Richard Nahin, Sean Mackey, Lynn DeBar, Robert Kerns, Michael Von Korff, Linda Porter, and Charles Helmick. 2018. Prevalence of chronic pain and high-impact chronic pain among adults—United States, 2016. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 67:1001–1006.\nDolmage, Jay T. 2014. Disability rhetoric. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.\nEndoWhat? [@endowhat]. 2022. What does your pain feel like? Instagram, March 16. https://instagram.com/p/CbLUBKAOP7o/.\nFauconnier, Arnaud, Elsa Dagongeville, Cyrille Huchon, Yves Ville, and Bruno Falissard. 2009. Measurement of acute pelvic pain intensity in gynecology: A comparison of five methods. Obstetrics and Gynecology 113 (2, Part 1): 260–269.\nFishbain, D. A. 1999. The association between chronic pain and suicide. Seminars in Clinical Neuropsychiatry 4 (3): 221–227.\nGarland-Thomson, Rosemarie. 2002. Integrating disability, transforming feminist theory. NWSA Journal 14 (3): 1–32.\nHedva, Johanna. 2016. Sick woman theory. Self-published essay. https://www.maskmagazine.com/not-again/struggle/sick-woman-theory.\nIASP announces revised definition of pain. 2020. International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP), July 20. https://www.iasp-pain.org/publications/iasp-news/iasp-announces-revised-definition-of-pain/.\nJackson, Gabrielle. 2019. Pain and prejudice: A call to arms for women and their bodies. London: Piatkus.\nJones, Cara E. 2016. The pain of endo existence: Toward a feminist disability studies reading of endometriosis. Hypatia 31 (3): 554–571.\nLau, Travis Chi Wing. 2020. Pain, my kin. Brevity, September 21. http://www.brevity.wordpress.com/2020/09/21/pain-my-kin/.\nMargaret, Price. 2015. The bodymind problem and the possibilities of pain. Hypatia 30 (1): 268–284. https://doi.org/10.1111/hypa.12127.\nNadeau, Stephen E., Jeffrey K. Wu, and Richard A. Lawhern. 2021. Opioids and chronic pain: An analytic review of the clinical evidence. Frontiers in Pain Research 2:1–15.\nPrendergast, Catherine. 2001. On the rhetorics of mental disability. In Embodied rhetorics: Disability in language and culture, ed. James C. Wilson and Cynthia Lewiecki-Wilson, 45–60. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.\nProject V. 2021. The pain dictionary: #Painstories from people with endometriosis. London: Bodyform.\nPrzybylo, Ela, and Breanne Fahs. 2018. Feels and flows: On the realness of menstrual pain and cripping menstrual chronicity. Feminist Formations 30 (1): 206–229.\nRichards, J. S., C. Nepomuceno, M. Riles, and Z. Suer. 1984. Assessing pain behavior: The UAB pain behavior scale. Pain 14:393–398.\nScarry, Elaine. 1985. The body in pain: The making and unmaking of the world. New York: Oxford University Press.\nSchott, G. D. 2004. Communicating the experience of pain: The role of analogy. Pain 108:209–212.\nSheppard, Emma. 2019. Chronic pain as fluid, BDSM as control. Disability Studies Quarterly 39 (2): https://dsq-sds.org/article/view/6353/5250.\nSiebers, Tobin. 2010. In the name of pain. In Against health: How health became the new morality, ed. Jonathan M. Metzl and Anna Kirkland, 183–194. New York: New York University Press.\nStinson, Jennifer N., Tricia Kavanaugh, Janet Yamada, Navreet Gill, and Bonnie Stevens. 2006. Systematic review of the psychometric properties, interpretability and feasibility of self-report pain intensity measures for use in clinical trials in children and adolescents. Pain 125 (1): 143–157.\nThe Métis Nation of Ontario. 2023. The Métis Nation of Ontario. https://www.metisnation.org/about-the-mno/.\nWendell, Susan. 2017. Unhealthy disabled: Treating chronic illnesses as disabilities. In The disability studies reader, ed. Lennard J. Davis, 160–172. New York: Routledge.\nWittgenstein, Ludwig. 1973. Philosophical investigations (3rd ed.). Translated by G. E. M. Anscombe. New York: Pearson. Originally published 1953.\nWoolf, Virginia. 1948. On being ill. In The moment and other essays, ed. Leonard Woolf, 9–23. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and Co.\nYergeau, Remi. 2018. Authoring autism: On rhetoric and neurological queerness. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.\nYong, Jason R., Peter M. Mullins, and Neil Bhattacharyya. 2022. Prevalence of chronic pain among adults in the United States. Pain 163 (2): 328–332.\nAuthor information\nAuthors and Affiliations\nCorresponding author\nRights and permissions\nCopyright information\n© 2026 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG\nAbout this chapter\nCite this chapter\nRovito, M. (2026). (Reconstruction) Pain Is a Sentence, and I Am Its Author: Embodied Knowledge, Rhetoric, and the Language of Endometriosis. In: Cripping Endometriosis. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-15681-5_5\nDownload citation\nDOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-15681-5_5\nPublished:\nPublisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham\nPrint ISBN: 978-3-032-15680-8\nOnline ISBN: 978-3-032-15681-5\neBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)","source_license":"CC0","license_restricted":false}