{"paper_id":"6c40b0cf-0767-467f-b256-6877f645bba9","body_text":"Causes of Menorrhagia in Females Between 21-50 Years of Age Attending the Out Patient Department of Naseer Teaching Hospital\nDOI:\nhttps://doi.org/10.37762/jgmds.2-1.56Keywords:\nMenorrhagia, Fibroid uterus, endometrial polypAbstract\nOBJECTIVES:\nTo determine the causes of menorrhagia\nMATERIAL AND METHODS:\nThis case series study was conducted in the department of obstetrics and Gyneacology Naseer Teaching Hospital Peshawar over a period of one year from June 2006 to May 2007. Eighty patients with menorrhagia were studied between ages of 21-50 years. All patients were thoroughly investigated for the causes of menorrhagia. All the patients having menstrual blood loss of more than eight days or history of passage of clots or having hemoglobin less than l0g/ dl were included in the study and patients having pubertal menorrhagia, less than 20 years of age or postmenopausal patients, on hormonal replacement therapy were excluded from the study.\nRESULTS:\nOut of total eighty patients, the commonest age group was above 40 years i.e.63.75% (n=51). The most common cause of menorrhagia was fibroid uterus in 47.5% (n=38) cases followed by adenomyosis in 25% (n=20) cases, endometrial polyp in 7.5% (n=6) cases, endometrial hyperplasia in 6.25% (n=5) cases, injectable progestogens in 6.25% (n=5) cases, intrauterine contraceptive device in 5% (n=4) cases. 30 patients (37.5%) were multipara, 25 (31.25%) were grand multipara and 25 (31.25%) were great grand multipara.All of them were anemic. Severe anemia (hemoglobin < 6 gm%) was found in one case (1.25%), moderate anemia (hemoglobin 6-8 gm%) in 45 cases (56.25%) and mild anemia (hemoglobin 8-10 gm%) in 34 cases (42.75%). Abdominal ultrasound alone was done in 63 cases (70.75%), and transvaginal ultrasound in 17 patients (21.25%). The diagnosis of fibroid uterus, endometrial polyp and endometrial hyperplasia was confirmed on ultrasound.\nCONCLUSION:\nIn my study fibroid uterus (47.5%), adenomyosis (25%), endometrial polyp (7.5%) and endometrial hyperplasia (6.25%) were the common causes in patients presenting with menorrhagia to Naseer Teaching Hospital causing disruption and psychological problem for females.\nDownloads\nMetrics\nReferences\nACOG committee on Practice Bulletins Gynecology, ACOG Practice bulletin, management of anovulatory bleeding. Int J Gynaecol obstet. 2001; 72:263-71 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7292(01)00357-5\nLyer V, Farquhar C, Jepson R. oral contraceptive pills for heavy menstrual bleeding Cochrane Data base syst. Rev.2000; (2): CD 000154\nHall berg L, Hogdahl AM, Nilsson L, Rybo G. Menstrual blood loss-a population study. Variation at different ages and attempts, to define normality. Acta obstet Gynecol scand 1966;45:320-51 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/00016346609158455\nWarner PE, crotchety H, Lumsden MA, Campbell- Brown M. Douglas A, Murray GD. Menorrhagia is the 80 ml blood loss criterion useful in management of complaint of menorrhagia. Am J obstet Gynecol. 2004; 190:1224-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2003.11.016\nMichael J, Gynnon O, Donovon. Update on endometrial ablation recent advances obstetrics and Gynaecology vol 23, 2005;159-68\nMr. A. Meenakshi, Dr Metilda Bhuvaneshwari International Journal of scientific and Research publications, volume3, june 2013 2250-3153\nInvine GA, Cemeron DR medical management of menorrhagia in pace review and answer, London, Royal College of obstetricians and Gynaecologists press; 1997:35-8\nJanssen CA, Scholten Pc, Heintz AP, Menorrhagia a search for epidemiological risk markers Matuntas 1997; 28: 19-25 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-5122(97)00065-0\nWegieka G, Baird DD, Hertz- picciottor I, Harlaw SD, SteegeJF, Hall Mc, etal Self- reported heavy bleeding associated with uterine leiomyomata obstet leiomyomata Obstet. Gynecol 2003, 10,:431-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-7844(02)03121-6\nDewaay Dj, Syoop CH, Nygaard IE, Davis WA, Van Voorhis B. Natural History of uterine polyps and leiomyomata Obstet. Gynaecol 2002; 100: 3-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00006250-200207000-00002\nPhillp CS. Faiz A. Dowling N, Dilly A, Michael LA, Ayers C, etal Age and prevalence of bleeding disorders in women with menorrhagia Obstet Gynecol 2005: 61-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000148889.15061.fb\nJames A, Matcher DB, Myers ER. Testing of von willebrand disease in women with menorrhagia: a system review obstet Gynecol 2004;104: 381-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000133487.55682.7b\nDijkuizen FP, mal Bub Bongers MY, Brolmann HA, Heintz AP cost effectiveness of transvaginal sonography and saline infused sonography in the evaluation of menoorhagia Int .J Gyencol Obstet 2003, 83: 45-52 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7292(03)00080-8\nHutchins Uterine fibroids Diagnosis and indications for treatment Obstet Gynecol clin North Amm 1995;22 (4): 659-65 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-8545(21)00659-8\nVan Eijkkeren. Menorrhagia ;current drug treatment concepts .Drugs 1992;43-201-09 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-199243020-00006\nShaws RW. Treating the patient with menorrhagia Br. J. obstet gynaecol 1994; 101: 1-12\nA huja, Kriplani. Von willebrand disease: a rare cause of puberty menorrhagia. Aust NZ obstet Gynaecol 1995;35(3): 337-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1479-828X.1995.tb01999.x\nManolitasas, uterine arteriovenous malformation :a rare cause of uterine haemorrhage Aust NZ obstet Gynaecol 1994; 334(2) 197-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1479-828X.1994.tb02691.x\nMazhar SB. Transcervical endometrial resection for menorrhagia: A review of 117 consecutive cases. J coll Physician surg Pak 1995; 5 (2) 5-7\nJohnstone shabaya Misheso (2012) Menorrhagia and the Levonorgestril intrauterine system hysterectomy Dr. Ayman Al-Hendy ( Ea), ISBN: 978-953-51-0434-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5772/30708\nShagufta Shaheen, Shahnaz Akhter, Naeema utman, causes of menorrhaiga and its pathological diagnosis by dilatation and curettage. JPM1 2005 vol 19 No.1: 62-66\nGoldrath and Husain. The hysterosopic management of endometrial leiomyomatosis J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparose 1997; 4 (2) 263-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1074-3804(97)80021-7\nMary E, Rimiza MD. Dysfunctional uterine bleeding. Pediatr Review 2002 ; 23 :227-33 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/pir.23-7-227\nCote I, Jacobs P, Cumming DC. Use of health services associated with increased menstrual loss in United States. AmJ Obstet Gynaecol 2003 ; 188:343-8. September 2015- March 2016 8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2003.92\nGoldrrath M.office hysteroscopy and sanction curettage in the evaluation of abnormal uterine bleeding. Cameron IT, Fraser IS, Smith SIC. Clinical disorders of the endometrium and menstrual cycle. Oxford University Press ; 1998.P 148-54\nMackenzie MD, Johnson NP. Menstrual cycle characteristics and risk of endometriosis. Am J Obsetet Gynecol 2001;180 : 1040-9\nSteiner RA. Fink D. Abnormal menstrual bleeding. Schweiz Rundsch Med prax 2002 Nov. 13 ; 91:1967-74 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1024/0369-8394.91.46.1967\nGoldstein SR Menorrhagia and abnormal uterine bleeding before the menopause Best Pract Res Clin obstet Gynaecol 2004 ; 18(1):59-69 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2003.10.003\nFayyaz S, Majeed SS. Audit of gynaecological hysterectomies. J Post grad. Med Inst 2001, 15(2) : 208-12\nLuqman m, Bukhari L. Abnormal excessive uterine haemorrhage : a histopathological study Pak J Pathol 1998; 9 : 20-3\nDownloads\nPublished\nHow to Cite\nIssue\nSection\nLicense\nCopyright (c) 2015 Anjum Ara, Dr., Naheed Rahim, Dr.\nThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.","source_license":"CC0","license_restricted":false}