{"paper_id":"68b5c350-2aaa-4d11-85c8-27646e403754","body_text":"1 \n \nwww.bio-protocol.org/e3763     \nBio-protocol 10(18): e3763. \nDOI:10.21769/BioProtoc.3763\n \n \n  Copyright Escudero-Lara et al. \nThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0). \n \nSurgical Induction of Endometriosis in Female Mice \nAlejandra Escudero-Lara1, David Cabañero1, 2, #, * and Rafael Maldonado1, 3, #, * \n \n1Laboratory of Neuropharmacology, Department of Experimental and Health Sciences, Universitat \nPompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain; 2Institute of Research, Development and Innovation in Healthcare \nBiotechnology of Elche (IDiBE), Universidad Miguel Hernández. Elche, Alicante, Spain; 3IMIM (Hospital \ndel Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain \n*For correspondence: dcabanero@umh.es; rafael.maldonado@upf.edu \n#Contributed equally to this work \n \n[Abstract] Endometriosis is a common gynecological disease characterized by the presence of \nendometrial tissue outside the uterine cavity. It is frequently associated with pain, infertility and a reduced \nquality of life, and it lacks adequate treatment. Several rodent models of endometriosis have been \ndeveloped through heterologous and homologous transplantation of endometrial tissue into the \nabdominal compartment. Here we describe a surgical procedure to generate a syngeneic model of \nendometriosis in immunocompetent mice with intact uterine and ovarian tissues. In this model, four \nuterine fragments from a donor mouse at diestrus are sutured to the abdominal wall of a recipient mouse. \nOne month after surgeries, endometrial implants develop into cysts with glandular epithelium and stroma, \nmimicking the endometriotic lesions observed in women with endometriosis. Therefore, this mouse \nmodel provides a valuable tool to study the pathophysiology of endometriosis and the efficacy of \npotential treatments. \nKeywords: Endometriosis, Female, Mouse, Model, Surgery, Syngeneic \n \n[Background] Endometriosis is a chronic gynecological condition defined by the growth of endometrial \ntissue outside the uterus, mainly in pelvic and abdominal surfaces (Zondervan et al., 2018). It affects \n10% of women in reproductive age and it is associated with pain, infertility and reduced quality of life \n(Fourquet et al. , 2011; Márki et al. , 2017; Zondervan et al. , 2018) . Available pharmacological and \nsurgical therapies for endometriosis have undesired effects and fail providing long- term alleviation of \nthe symptoms (Fal cone and Flyckt, 2018). Hence, new therapeutic strategies are needed, and their \ndevelopment relies on the establishment of animal models that recapitulate the pathophysiological and \nbehavioral features of clinical endometriosis. \n  Endometriosis occurs spontaneously in human and nonhuman primates (D’Hooghe et al. , 1992; \nHadfield et al., 1997). In baboons, endometriosis has also been experimentally induced by injection of \nmenstrual effluent into the pelvis (D’Hooghe et al. , 1995), resulting in a model that closely mimics \nendometriosis in women. However, the use of nonhuman primates is limited by economical and ethical \nissues (D’Hooghe et al. , 2009). In this scenario, rodents are cost -effective and widely available, \nrepresenting a very useful tool for endometriosis research (Grümmer, 2006). Different heterologous and \nhomologous rodent models have been developed to study the etiology of endometriosis and the efficacy \nPlease cite this article as: Escudero-Lara et. al., (2020). Surgical Induction of Endometriosis in Female Mice,Bio-protocol 10 (18): e3763. DOI:\n10.21769/BioProtoc.3763.\n\n\n                 \n2 \n \nwww.bio-protocol.org/e3763     \nBio-protocol 10(18): e3763. \nDOI:10.21769/BioProtoc.3763\n \n \n  Copyright Escudero-Lara et al. \nThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0). \nof compounds on its development and symptoms. On the one hand, heterologous models involve \nxenotransplantation of human endometrial ti ssue–ectopic, eutopic or cultured stromal and epithelial \ncells–into immunodeficient mice (Greaves et al., 2017). These models allow the evaluation of potential \ntherapies on endometriotic lesions that maintain human histological characteristics (Hull et al., 2008), \nhowever, the lack of a normal immunological response represents an important limitation for the study \nof this chro nic inflammatory condition. On the other hand, homologous models have been developed \nthrough surgical transplantation or injection of endometrial tissue from the same animal or a syngeneic \ndonor into the peritoneal cavity of immunocompetent animals ( Vernon and Wilson, 1985; Somigliana  \net al., 1999; Fattori et al., 2020). Syngeneic transplantation of endometrial tissue avoids complications \nrelated to the resection of one uterine tissue from the same animal and allows studying the contribution \nof host and donor cells on endometriosis (Zhao et al. , 2016). Among syngeneic models, the one \npresented here involves suturing of uterine fragments and has the advantage of high reproducibility of \nthe lesions, allowing easy identification and size comparison when testing disease-modifying drugs. \n  Here we describe the implementation of a syngeneic surgical model of endometriosis in \nimmunocompetent mice with intact uterine tissue and ovarian function. This model reproduces the \nectopic endometrial growths observed in clinical endometriosis as well as some of its symptoms, \nincluding persistent pain hypersensitivity in the lower abdomen, anx iety-related behavior and potential \ncognitive deficits (Escudero- Lara et al. , 2020). Furthermore, we have used this model to show the \nefficacy of Δ9 -tetrahydrocannabinol limiting the development of endometriosis and its pain- related \nmanifestations (Escudero -Lara et al. , 2020). Since the present approach allows the use of \nimmunocompetent mice with an unaltered estrous cycle, we consider this resource a model with high \nconstruct and face validity, valuable for identification and assessment of novel therapeutic strategies for \nendometriosis. \n \nMaterials and Reagents \n \n1. 24 x 60 mm coverslips (Deltalab, Euroturbo®, catalog number: D102460) \n2. 200 µl pipette tips (Daslab, catalog number: 162006) \n3. Microscope slides (Avantor, VWRTM, catalog number: 631-1553) \n4. Rolled cotton 100% (Acofarma, Acofar®, catalog number: 4957051) \n5. Iodine-povidone (Meda Pharma SAU, Betadine®, catalog number: 716720.4) \n6. No. 15 Sterile Disposable Scalpels (Swann Morton, catalog number: 0505) \n7. Petri dishes (BD, FalconTM, catalog number: 353001) \n8. 0.7 METRIC, 45 cm (6-0 18’’) silk sutures (Alcon, catalog number: 184801) \n9. 26 G needles (BD, MicrolanceTM, catalog number: 300300) \n10. 1 ml syringes (BD, PlastipakTM, catalog number: 303172) \n11. Reaction tubes, 1.5 ml (Sarstedt, catalog number: 72.690.001) \n12. Isoflurane-absorbing charcoal filter (Bickford, OMNICON f/air, catalog number: 80120) \n13. 8-week-old female C57Bl/6J mice (Charles Rivers Laboratories, JAXTM, strain code: 632) \nPlease cite this article as: Escudero-Lara et. al., (2020). Surgical Induction of Endometriosis in Female Mice,Bio-protocol 10 (18): e3763. DOI:\n10.21769/BioProtoc.3763.\n\n\n                 \n3 \n \nwww.bio-protocol.org/e3763     \nBio-protocol 10(18): e3763. \nDOI:10.21769/BioProtoc.3763\n \n \n  Copyright Escudero-Lara et al. \nThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0). \nNote: Housed in cages of four to five mice with water and food available ad libitum. Housing \nconditions are maintained at 21 ± 1 °C and 55 ± 10% relative humidity in a 12 h light/dark cycle \n(light on from 8 AM to 8 PM). \n14. Saline solution 0.9% sodium chloride (ERN, Vitulia, catalog number: 999791.5) \n15. Distilled water (dH2O) \n16. Medical Oxygen (Abelló Linde, Conoxia®, catalog number: 652547.0) \n17. Isoflurane (Virbac, Vetflurane®, catalog number: 575837-4) \n18. Ophthalmic ointment (Nicox, Xilin, catalog number: 171324) \n19. Optimal cutting temperature compound (O.C.T) (Sakura Finetek, Tissue-Tek® O.C.T.TM, catalog \nnumber: 4583) \n20. Cryomolds (Sakura Finetek Tissue-Tek® Cryomold®, catalog number: 4565) \n21. Papanicolaou's solution 1a Harris' hematoxylin solution (Merck Millipore, catalog number: \n104302) \n22. Eosin G or Y 0.5% alcoholic (Diapath, catalog number: C0353) \n23. Xylene Cyanol FF (Sigma-Aldrich, catalog number: X4126) \n24. Mounting medium for microscopy (Deltalab, VITROCLUD®, catalog number: A20250) \n25. Gelatin (Sigma-Aldrich, catalog number: G9391) \n26. KCr(SO4)2·12H2O (Merck Millipore, EMSURE®, catalog number: 101036) \n27. NaH2PO4·2H2O (Sigma-Aldrich, catalog number: 71505) \n28. Na2HPO4·12H2O (Sigma-Aldrich, catalog number: 71649) \n29. NaCl (Sigma-Aldrich, catalog number: S7653) \n30. PFA (Merck Millipore, catalog number: 104005) \n31. NaOH (Merck Millipore, catalog number: 109137) \n32. Sodium azide (Sigma-Aldrich, catalog number: S2002) \n33. Sucrose (Merck Millipore, catalog number: 107687) \n34. 100% ethanol (Merck Millipore, EMSURE®, catalog number: 1009831) \n35. Gentamicin (Laboratorios Normon, Genta-Gobens®, catalog number: 999037.7) \n36. Meloxicam (Boehringer Ingelheim, Metacam®, catalog number: 210028) \n37. Methylene blue (Scharlau, EsssentQ®, catalog number: AZ02030025) \n38. Gelatinized microscope slides (see Recipes) \n39. 0.3 mg/ml gentamicin (see Recipes) \n40. 0.2 mg/ml meloxicam (see Recipes) \n41. 0.01 M phosphate buffered saline (PBS) (see Recipes) \n42. 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) (see Recipes) \n43. Cryoprotectant solution: 30% sucrose with 0.1% sodium azide (see Recipes) \n44. 96% and 70% ethanol (see Recipes) \n45. 0.01% methylene blue in saline solution (see Recipes) \n  \nPlease cite this article as: Escudero-Lara et. al., (2020). Surgical Induction of Endometriosis in Female Mice,Bio-protocol 10 (18): e3763. DOI:\n10.21769/BioProtoc.3763.\n\n\n                 \n4 \n \nwww.bio-protocol.org/e3763     \nBio-protocol 10(18): e3763. \nDOI:10.21769/BioProtoc.3763\n \n \n  Copyright Escudero-Lara et al. \nThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0). \nEquipment \n \n1. P20 pipette (Gilson, model: PIPETMAN® P20, catalog number: F123600) \n2. Plastic staining jars and baskets (Brand, Brand®, catalog number: 471800) \n3. Light microscope (Leica Microsystems, model: DM6000 B) with camera (Leica Microsystems, \nmodel: DFC300 FX) \n4. Anesthesia circuit including isoflurane vaporizer (Midmark, Isoflurane VIP 3000 ®-Well-Fill, \ncatalog number: 91305430), tubing, regulating valves, nose cones and induction chamber \n(Midmark, catalog number: 93805108) (Figure 1) \n5. Cold light source (Leica Microsystems, model: CLS 50 X) \n6. Electric hair-clipper (BBraun, Aesculap®, model: ISIS, catalog number: GT421) \n7. Heating pads (Daga, catalog number: N2P 220-230) \n8. Small serrated-semi curved tip forceps (Allgaier Instrumente, A-line endoscopy, catalog number: \n08-515-005) \n9. Haemostatic forceps (Allgaier Instrumente, A-line endoscopy, catalog number:13-028-120) \n10. Rounded tip scissors (Medicon, catalog number: 02.50.62) \n11. Dissection scissors (Medicon, catalog number: 02.70.14) \n12. Microdissection scissors (Dimeda, catalog number: 09.102.11) \n13. Cryostat (Leica Biosystems, model: CM3050) \n14. Macro Zoom Microscope (Olympus, model: MVX10) with camera (Olympus, model: DP71) \n15. -80 °C freezer (Thermo Fisher, -86 C ULT Freezer, model: 917) \n \n \nFigure 1. Anesthesia circuit. A. Isoflurane vaporizer. B. Nose cone. C. Induction chamber. \n \nSoftware \n \n1. Leica Application Suite software v4.0 (Leica Microsystems, www.leica-microsystems.com) \nPlease cite this article as: Escudero-Lara et. al., (2020). Surgical Induction of Endometriosis in Female Mice,Bio-protocol 10 (18): e3763. DOI:\n10.21769/BioProtoc.3763.\n\n\n                 \n5 \n \nwww.bio-protocol.org/e3763     \nBio-protocol 10(18): e3763. \nDOI:10.21769/BioProtoc.3763\n \n \n  Copyright Escudero-Lara et al. \nThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0). \n2. Cell^D Life Science documentation software (Matrix Optics, www.matrixoptics.com) \n \nProcedure \n \nA. Selection of donors in diestrus: estrous cycle determination \n1. Place the mouse on the cage grid, and gently pull the tail backwards to induce the mouse \ngripping the grid and pulling forward. With the other hand, grasp the mouse by the scruff of the \nneck and pin the tail between the palm and the fourth finger of the hand holding the scruff. \n2. Place the pipette tip at the opening of the vaginal canal and flush the vagina 5 times with 20 μl \nof saline solution in and out. \n3. Place the resulting fluid onto a gelatinized slide. \n4. Let the drop air-dry. \n5. Stain with 0.01% methylene blue for 2 min. \n6. Wash twice in distilled water for 2 min. \n7. Let air-dry. \n8. Take images of stained cells using the 40x objective of a light microscope to determine the stage \nof the estrous cycle (Figure 2): \na. In proestrus, most cells are nucleated. \nb. In estrus, mostly cornified epithelial cells are present. \nc. In metestrus, cornified epithelial cells and leukocytes are found. \nd. In diestrus, leukocytes are predominant, and some nucleated and cornified epithelial cells \nare present. \n \n \nFigure 2. Vaginal cytology from mice in each stage of the estrous cycle.  A. Proestrus. B. \nEstrus. C. Metestrus. D. Diestrus . Nucleated epithelial cells, cornified epithelial cells, and \nleukocytes are indicated by black, green and red arrows, respectively. Scale bar = 50 μm. \n \nB. Obtention of endometrial and control tissues: excision of uterine fragments and abdominal fat \n1. Euthanize the donor mouse in diestrus by cervical dislocation. \nPlease cite this article as: Escudero-Lara et. al., (2020). Surgical Induction of Endometriosis in Female Mice,Bio-protocol 10 (18): e3763. DOI:\n10.21769/BioProtoc.3763.\n\n\n                 \n6 \n \nwww.bio-protocol.org/e3763     \nBio-protocol 10(18): e3763. \nDOI:10.21769/BioProtoc.3763\n \n \n  Copyright Escudero-Lara et al. \nThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0). \n2. Make a midline incision on the abdomen using a scalpel and excise the uterus (Figures 3A and \n3B). \n3. Place the uterus in a Petri dish containing cold saline solution (4 ºC, on ice) (Figure 3C). \n4. Place abdominal fat of a size similar to the uterus in another Petri dish containing cold saline \nsolution (Figure 3D). \n5. Strip one excised uterine horn and open it longitudinally with microdissection scissors, exposing \nthe endometrium (Figures 3E and 3F). \nNote: Keep the other uterine horn unopened and in cold saline solution until used to induce \nendometriosis on a second recipient mouse. \n6. Use a new scalpel to cut the uterine horn or the fat in four squares with each side measuring  \n2 x 2 mm (Figures 3G and 3H). \n7. Keep the uterine fragments in cold saline solution until needed. \n \n \nFigure 3. Excision of uterine fragments and abdominal fat . A. A midline incision (dashed \nline) is made on the abdomen of the euthanized donor mouse. B. The uterus (blue arrow) and \nthe abdominal fat (black arrow) are exposed through the incision. C. The uterus is excised and \nplaced in a Petri dish containing cold saline solution. D. Abdominal fat tissue is also excised and \nplaced in another Petri dish containing cold saline solution. E. The uterine horns are stripped. F. \nOne uterine horn is opened longitudinally, exposing the endometrium. G. The opened uterine \nhorn is cut in four fragments of 2 x 2 mm that are used for the endometriosis surgery. H. \nPlease cite this article as: Escudero-Lara et. al., (2020). Surgical Induction of Endometriosis in Female Mice,Bio-protocol 10 (18): e3763. DOI:\n10.21769/BioProtoc.3763.\n\n\n                 \n7 \n \nwww.bio-protocol.org/e3763     \nBio-protocol 10(18): e3763. \nDOI:10.21769/BioProtoc.3763\n \n \n  Copyright Escudero-Lara et al. \nThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0). \nAbdominal fat is also cut in similar-sized fragments that are used for the control surgery. \n \nC. Surgical induction of endometriosis: peritoneal implantation of ectopic endometrium \n1. Anesthetize the recipient mouse with 4% V/V isoflurane in medical oxygen (2 L /min) in the \ninduction chamber. \n2. Once anesthetized, place the mouse on top of a heating pad and maintain anesthesia with 2.5% \nV/V isoflurane in medical oxygen (2 L/min) using a nose cone. \n3. Apply ophthalmic ointment to avoid drying of the eyes. \n4. Shave the abdomen of the mouse using an electric hair-clipper. \n5. Clean the skin with a piece of cotton soaked in iodine-povidone solution (Figure 4A). \n6. Make a 1 cm midline incision on the skin using a scalpel, ending approximately 0.5 cm cranial \nto the vaginal ending. \n7. Insert closed rounded tip scissors between the skin and the abdominal wall and open them to \ndetach the skin from the muscle.  \n8. Make a 1 cm incision on the abdominal wall using the small scissors and use blunt forceps to \nexpose its inner surface (Figure 4B). \n9. Suture the uterine fragments into the abdominal wall (two on each side of the incision) with loose \nsquare knots of 6-0 black silk. Uterine fragments must be sutured with the endometrial surface \nfacing the peritoneal cavity (Figures 4C and 4D). \n10. Close the muscular abdominal wall with three loose square knots of 6-0 black silk (Figure 4E). \n11. Close the skin with three square knots of 6-0 black silk. \n12. Clean the skin with a piece of cotton soaked in povidone-iodine solution (Figure 4F). \n13. Leave the animal lying over one side in a clean cage partially placed over a heating pad until it \nrecovers. \nNotes: \na. Whenever the use of analgesics and antibiotics does not interfere with the purpose of the \nexperiment, give meloxicam (2 mg/kg, subcutaneously, injection volume 10 ml/kg) and \ngentamicin (1 mg/kg, intraperitoneally, injection volume 3 ml/kg) right after surgery and 24 h \nlater. \nb. To induce endometriosis to a second recipient mouse, repeat the procedure from Step B4 using \nthe remaining uterine horn excised from the same donor mouse. \n \nPlease cite this article as: Escudero-Lara et. al., (2020). Surgical Induction of Endometriosis in Female Mice,Bio-protocol 10 (18): e3763. DOI:\n10.21769/BioProtoc.3763.\n\n\n                 \n8 \n \nwww.bio-protocol.org/e3763     \nBio-protocol 10(18): e3763. \nDOI:10.21769/BioProtoc.3763\n \n \n  Copyright Escudero-Lara et al. \nThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0). \n \nFigure 4. Surgical induction of endometriosis. A. The abdomen of an anesthetized recipient \nmouse is shaved and cl eaned with iodine -povidone solution. B. The inner surface of the \nabdominal wall is exposed through a 1 cm incision. C and D. Two fragments of uterine tissue or \nfat from a donor mouse are sutured on each side of the incision. E. The muscular abdominal \nwall is closed with three loose square knots. F. The skin is closed with three square knots and \ncleaned with iodine-povidone solution. \n \nD. Control mice: peritoneal implantation of abdominal fat \nTo obtain control mice repeat the procedure from Section C, substituting the Step C9 by suturing \nthe fat fragments into the abdominal wall (two on each side of the incision) with loose square knots \nof 6-0 black silk. \n \nE. Confirmation of endometriosis: histology of endometriotic lesions \nNote: Establish the time of necropsy according to the purpose of the experiment. Control mice \nshould not develop endometriotic lesions. \n1. Perform a vaginal lavage as described in Section A if the stage of the estrous cycle at the time \nof sample collection needs to be considered. \n2. Euthanize the mouse by cervical dislocation.  \n3. Use dissection scissors to make a dorsal incision in the back of the mouse at the level of the \npelvis and peel the skin (Figure 5A). \n4. Remove the spine from S1 to L1 by making a first cut at the level of the most caudal rib and a \nsecond cut 1 cm caudal to the first one. Then, cut both sides along the spinal column (Figure \n5A). \nNote: Spinal cord and dorsal root ganglia can be isolated from the extracted fragment of spinal \ncolumn and used for biochemical and immunohistochemical analyses. \nPlease cite this article as: Escudero-Lara et. al., (2020). Surgical Induction of Endometriosis in Female Mice,Bio-protocol 10 (18): e3763. DOI:\n10.21769/BioProtoc.3763.\n\n\n                 \n9 \n \nwww.bio-protocol.org/e3763     \nBio-protocol 10(18): e3763. \nDOI:10.21769/BioProtoc.3763\n \n \n  Copyright Escudero-Lara et al. \nThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0). \n5. Carefully pull out the intestines to allow the examination of the abdominal wall (Figure 5B). \n6. Excise the cystic endometriotic lesions and remove the surrounding fat tissue using dissection \nscissors and forceps. Special care should be taken to avoid lancing the fluid-filled cysts (Figure \n5C). \n7. Place the endometriotic lesions in reaction tubes with paraformaldehyde 4% and allow tissue \nfixation for 4 h at 4 °C. \n8. Wash 3 x 5 min with 0.01 M PBS at room temperature. \n9. Keep samples in sucrose 30% with 0.1% sodium azide for 6 days to cryoprotect the tissue. \n10. T ake the samples out of the sucrose solution, remove sucrose excess with filter paper, embed \nin cryomolds filled with O.C.T . and store at -80 °C. \n11. Section samples at 20 μm with a cryostat and mount onto gelatinized slides. Store at -20 °C. \n12. Stain with hematoxylin and eosin: \na. Leave the slides in staining baskets and allow them to thaw. \nb. Sink in 100% ethanol for 5 min. \nc. Sink in 96% ethanol for 5 min. \nd. Sink in 70% ethanol for 5 min. \ne. Wash with distilled water. \nf. Immerse in Papanicolaou's solution 1a Harris' hematoxylin solution for 5 min. \ng. Wash in distilled water for 2 min. \nh. Immerse in Eosin G or Y 0.5% alcoholic for 30 s. \ni. Sink in 70% ethanol for 5 min. \nj. Sink in 96% ethanol for 5 min. \nk. Sink in 100% ethanol for 5 min. \nl. Clear with Xylene Cyanol FF for 5 min. \nm. Mount coverslip with mounting medium for microscopy. \nn. Allow to dry horizontally for 3 days. \n13. Capture images of stained sections using a macro zoom microscope for assessment of diameter \nand histological features (Figure 5D). \n  \nPlease cite this article as: Escudero-Lara et. al., (2020). Surgical Induction of Endometriosis in Female Mice,Bio-protocol 10 (18): e3763. DOI:\n10.21769/BioProtoc.3763.\n\n\n                 \n10 \n \nwww.bio-protocol.org/e3763     \nBio-protocol 10(18): e3763. \nDOI:10.21769/BioProtoc.3763\n \n \n  Copyright Escudero-Lara et al. \nThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0). \n \nFigure 5. Endometriotic lesions recovered 32 days after surgical induction of \nendometriosis. A. Removal of the spine from S1 to L1 (dashed lines). B. Uterine fragments \nimplanted into the abdominal wall develop into cysts. C. Endometriotic cyst of approximately  \n2.5 mm diameter. D. Hematoxylin and eosin stained section of an endometriotic lesion showing \nthe presence of stroma (orange arrow) and glandular epithelium (blue arrow). Scale bar = 1 mm. \n \nNotes \n \n1. Use different scalpels and silk sutures for uterine fragments or fat, and for muscle and skin. \n2. Mice should be monitored daily for at least 3 days after surgeries. If a mouse removes the skin \nsutures, briefly anesthetize with isoflurane (4% V/V for induction, 2.5% V/V for maintenance), \nwash the incision site with saline solution and clos e the skin with 6- 0 black silk square knots. \nAfterwards, disinfect with iodine-povidone solution. \n3. Mice should be supervised following an adaptation of the Morton and Griffiths guidelines on the \nrecognition of pain, distress and discomfort (Morton and Griffiths, 1985). This adapted protocol \nconsiders four variables, and a score is assigned for each variable: \na. Weight loss: \n0 Normal. There is no weight loss or the animal grows normally. \n1 Weight loss less than 10%. \n2 Weight loss between 10 and 20%. Alteration in the appearance or amount of stool. \n3 Weight loss greater than 20%. The animal does not consume water or food. \nb. Coat appearance: \n0 Normal. \n1 Hair in poor condition. \n2 Hair in poor condition and ocular or nasal secretions. \n3 Piloerection. \nc. Movement/posture/behavior of the animal: \n0 Normal. \n1 Small changes. \nPlease cite this article as: Escudero-Lara et. al., (2020). Surgical Induction of Endometriosis in Female Mice,Bio-protocol 10 (18): e3763. DOI:\n10.21769/BioProtoc.3763.\n\n\n                 \n11 \n \nwww.bio-protocol.org/e3763     \nBio-protocol 10(18): e3763. \nDOI:10.21769/BioProtoc.3763\n \n \n  Copyright Escudero-Lara et al. \nThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0). \n2 Moderate changes. \n3 Inactivity, aggressiveness, self-mutilation or vocalizations. \nd. Aspect of the incision site: \n0 Normal. \n1 Slight redness. \n2 Local edema. \n3 Infection, darkening (signs of necrosis). \nThe final score is calculated as the sum of the scores obtained for each variable, and it \ndetermines the application of corrective actions: \na. 0 to 3. The mouse does not require any corrective action. \nb. 4 to 7. The mouse requires the application of corrective actions. \nc. Equal to 8. The mouse should be euthanized. \n*Euthanasia will be practiced if the score for any of the variables is 3. \nCorrective measures include cleaning the wound with disinfectant and applying topical antibiotic, \nplacing the cage on top of a heating pad and supplying nutrient -enriched hydrating gel or food \npellets soaked in water to facilitate feeding. \n \nRecipes \n \n1. Gelatinized microscope slides \na. Prepare 0.5% gelatin-coating solution \n0.5 g gelatin \n0.5 g KCr(SO4)2·12H2O \ndH2O up to 400 ml \nstir at 50 °C until dissolved \nb. Gelatinize slides \nPlace the slides in staining baskets \nSoak the baskets 3 x 30 s in 0.5% gelatin-coating solution, waiting 30 s between immersions \nBlot excess solution onto filter paper and cover the baskets containing the slides \nwith aluminum foil \nDry in an incubator at 37 °C for 24 h \n2. 0.3 mg/ml gentamicin  \n31.25 µl gentamicin \n5 ml saline solution 0.9% sodium chloride \n3. 0.2 mg/ml meloxicam \n0.2 ml meloxicam \n4.8 ml saline solution 0.9% sodium chloride \n4. 0.01 M phosphate buffered saline (PBS) \na. Prepare Solution A: 0.2 M sodium phosphate monobasic \nPlease cite this article as: Escudero-Lara et. al., (2020). Surgical Induction of Endometriosis in Female Mice,Bio-protocol 10 (18): e3763. DOI:\n10.21769/BioProtoc.3763.\n\n\n                 \n12 \n \nwww.bio-protocol.org/e3763     \nBio-protocol 10(18): e3763. \nDOI:10.21769/BioProtoc.3763\n \n \n  Copyright Escudero-Lara et al. \nThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0). \n3.12 g NaH2PO4·2H2O \ndH2O up to 100 ml \nb. Prepare Solution B: 0.2 M sodium phosphate dibasic \n28.65 g Na2HPO4·12H2O \ndH2O up to 400 ml \nc. Prepare 0.1 M phosphate buffer (PB), pH 7.4 \n100 ml Solution A \n400 ml Solution B \n500 ml dH2O \nd. Prepare 0.1 M PBS \n9 g NaCl \n1,000 ml 0.1 M PB \ne. Prepare 0.01 M PBS \n100 ml 0.1 M PBS \n1,000 ml dH2O \n5. 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) \n10 g PFA \n1 ml 1 M NaOH \n0.1 M PB (see Recipe 3) up to 250 ml \n6. Cryoprotectant solution: 30% sucrose with 0.1% sodium azide \na. Prepare 0.01 M PBS (see Recipe 3) \nb. Prepare 20% sodium azide solution \n2 g sodium azide \ndH2O up to 10 ml \nc. Prepare cryoprotectant solution \n30 g sucrose \n0.5 ml 20% sodium azide \n0.01 M PBS up to 100 ml \n7. 96% and 70% ethanol \na. 96% ethanol \n480 ml 100% ethanol \n20 ml dH2O \nb. 70% ethanol \n350 ml 100% ethanol \n150 ml dH2O \n8. 0.01% methylene blue in saline solution \n2 mg methylene blue \n20 ml saline solution 0.9% sodium chloride \n \nPlease cite this article as: Escudero-Lara et. al., (2020). Surgical Induction of Endometriosis in Female Mice,Bio-protocol 10 (18): e3763. DOI:\n10.21769/BioProtoc.3763.\n\n\n                 \n13 \n \nwww.bio-protocol.org/e3763     \nBio-protocol 10(18): e3763. \nDOI:10.21769/BioProtoc.3763\n \n \n  Copyright Escudero-Lara et al. \nThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0). \nAcknowledgments \n \n“Instituto de Salud Carlos III”, “Redes temáticas de investigación cooperativa en salud –Red de \ntrastornos adictivos” (#RD16/0017/0020), “Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades”, \nMCIU (#SAF2017-84060-R-AEI/FEDER-UE), “Generalitat de Catalunya- Agència de Gestió d'Ajuts \nUniversitaris i de Recerca -AGAUR\" (#2017 -SGR-669 and #ICREA Acadèmia2015) to R.M. are \nacknowledged. \n  This protocol was adapted from an established published procedure to induce endometriosis to \nrats (Somigliana et al., 1999), and has already been used by our group (Escudero-Lara et al., 2020). \n \nCompeting interests \n \nThe authors declare no conflicts of interest. \n \nEthics \n \nAnimal experimentation: All animal procedures were conducted in accordance with standard ethical \nguidelines (European Communities Directive 2010/63/EU and NIH Guide for Care and Use of \nLaboratory Animals, 8th Edition) and approved by autonomic (Generalitat de Catalunya, \nDepartament de Territori i Sostenibilitat) and local (Comitè Ètic d'Experimentació Animal, CEEA -\nPRBB) ethical committees. \n \nReferences \n \n1. D'Hooghe, T. M., Bambra, C. S., Isahakia, M. and Koninckx, P. R. (1992). Evolution of \nspontaneous endometriosis in the baboon (Papio anubis, Papio cynocephalus) over a 12-month \nperiod. Fertil Steril 58(2): 409-412. \n2. D'Hooghe, T. M., Bambra, C. S., Raeymaekers, B. M., De Jonge, I., Lauweryns, J. M. and \nKoninckx, P. R. (1995). Intrapelvic injection of menstrual endometrium causes endometriosis in \nbaboons (Papio cynocephalus and Papio anubis). Am J Obstet Gynecol 173(1): 125-134. \n3. D'Hooghe, T. M., Kyama, C. M., Chai, D., Fassbender, A., Vodolazkaia, A., Bokor, A. and \nMwenda, J. M. (2009). Nonhuman primate models for translational research in endometriosis.  \nReprod Sci 16(2): 152-161. \n4. Escudero-Lara, A., Argerich, J., Cabanero, D. and Maldonado, R. (2020). Disease-modifying \neffects of natural Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol in endometriosis-associated pain. Elife 9: e50356. \n5. Falcone, T. and Flyckt, R. (2018). Clinical Management of Endometriosis.  Obstet Gynecol  \n131(3): 557-571. \n6. Fattori, V., Franklin, N. S., Gonzalez -Cano, R., Peterse, D., Ghalali, A., Madrian, E., Verri, W. \nA., Jr., Andrews, N., Woolf, C. J. and Rogers, M. S. (2020). Nonsurgical mouse model of \nPlease cite this article as: Escudero-Lara et. al., (2020). Surgical Induction of Endometriosis in Female Mice,Bio-protocol 10 (18): e3763. DOI:\n10.21769/BioProtoc.3763.\n\n\n                 \n14 \n \nwww.bio-protocol.org/e3763     \nBio-protocol 10(18): e3763. \nDOI:10.21769/BioProtoc.3763\n \n \n  Copyright Escudero-Lara et al. \nThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0). \nendometriosis-associated pain that responds to clinically active drugs. Pain 161(6): 1321-1331. \n7. Fourquet, J., Baez, L., Figueroa, M., Iriarte, R. I. and Flores, I. (2011).  Quantification of the \nimpact of endometriosis symptoms on health-related quality of life and work productivity. Fertil \nSteril 96(1): 107-112. \n8. Greaves, E., Critchley, H. O. D., Horne, A. W. and Saunders, P. T. K. (2017). Relevant human \ntissue resources and laboratory models for use in endometriosis research. Acta Obstet Gynecol \nScand 96(6): 644-658. \n9. Grümmer, R. (2006). Animal models in endometriosis research.  Hum Reprod Update 12(5): \n641-649. \n10. Hadfield, R. M., Yudkin, P. L., Coe, C. L., Scheffler, J., Uno, H., Barlow, D. H., Kemnitz, J. W. \nand Kennedy, S. H. (1997). Risk factors for endometriosis in the rhesus monkey (Macaca \nmulatta): a case-control study. Hum Reprod Update 3(2): 109-115. \n11. Hull, M. L., Escareno, C. R., Godsland, J. M., Doig, J. R., Johnson, C. M., Phillips, S. C., Smith, \nS. K., Tavare, S., Print, C. G. and Charnock -Jones, D. S. (2008). Endometrial-peritoneal \ninteractions during endometriotic lesion establishment. Am J Pathol 173(3): 700-715. \n12. Márki, G., Bokor, A., Rigo, J. and Rigo, A. (2017). Physical pain and emotion regulation as the \nmain predictive factors of health-related quality of life in women living with endometriosis. Hum \nReprod 32(7): 1432-1438. \n13. Morton, D. B. and Griffiths, P. H. (1985). Guidelines on the recognition of pai n, distress and \ndiscomfort in experimental animals and an hypothesis for assessment.  Vet Rec 116(16): 431-\n436. \n14. Somigliana, E., Vigano, P., Rossi, G., Carinelli, S., Vignali, M. and Panina-Bordignon, P. (1999). \nEndometrial ability to implant in ectopic sites can be prevented by interleukin -12 in a murine \nmodel of endometriosis. Hum Reprod 14(12): 2944-2950. \n15. Vernon, M. W. and Wilson, E. A. (1985). Studies on the surgical induction of endometriosis in \nthe rat. Fertil Steril 44(5): 684-694. \n16. Zhao, Y., Chen, Y., Kuang, Y., Bagchi, M. K., Taylor, R. N., Katzenellenbogen, J. A. and \nKatzenellenbogen, B. S. (2016). Multiple Beneficial Roles of Repressor of Estrogen Receptor \nActivity (REA) in Suppressing the Progression of Endometriosis.  Endocrinology 157(2): 900-\n912. \n17. Zondervan, K. T., Becker, C. M., Koga, K., Missmer, S. A., Taylor, R. N. and Vigano, P. (2018). \nEndometriosis. Nat Rev Dis Primers 4(1): 9. \nPlease cite this article as: Escudero-Lara et. al., (2020). Surgical Induction of Endometriosis in Female Mice,Bio-protocol 10 (18): e3763. DOI:\n10.21769/BioProtoc.3763.","source_license":"CC-BY-4.0","license_restricted":false}