{"paper_id":"64efde56-2823-4c02-8f35-2bacf6f050a5","body_text":"The goal of genetics is to identify key proteins in order to better understand the pathophysiology of a disease, to define new therapeutic targets and to find diagnostic biomarkers. Migraine is a highly disabling, complex brain disorder with a strong familial aggregation. Twin and family studies conducted in the 1990s demonstrated the existence of hereditary factors in migraine [ 1 ,  2 ]. In these studies, the estimated heritability of migraine ranged from 35% to 60%. In population-based studies, the relative risk of migraine for a first-degree relative of an index case was 1.5- to 4-fold compared with the general population [ 3 ]. The risk was higher for relatives of cases with higher pain scores and attack frequency, early age of onset, and migraine with aura (MwA).\nMore recent studies estimate the heritability of migraine to be about 42%. They also reinforce the idea that migraine is a complex disease resulting from interactions between genes and the environment, interactions between genes themselves, and as yet unknown factors [ 3 ]. Heritability is higher in MwA than in migraine without aura (MO) [ 4 ].\nMigraine is predominantly polygenic, with multiple genetic variants, each with a minor-effect size, accumulating to lead to the disease. A portion of MwA cases could be explained by the conjunction of a small number of genetic variants with moderate effect size, or by a single variant with a major functional effect as in monogenic migraines [ 5 ] (Fig.  1 ). In these much rarer disorders, a pathogenic mutation in a single gene is sufficient to produce the disease with almost complete penetrance. The classical example of monogenic migraine is familial hemiplegic migraine (FHM), which is inherited in an autosomal dominant fashion [ 6 ]. Migraines can also be part of the clinical spectrum of other hereditary neurological conditions, such as cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL). Other examples will be discussed further in this paper. Fig. 1 Overview of migraine and genetics. An overview of the complex genetic architecture of migraine, from polygenic model on the left, to monogenic model on the right.  Created with BioRender.com\nOverview of migraine and genetics. An overview of the complex genetic architecture of migraine, from polygenic model on the left, to monogenic model on the right.  Created with BioRender.com\n\nHemiplegic migraine (HM) is a rare disease with an estimated prevalence of 0.01% in the general population [ 6 ,  7 ]. Familial HM, diagnosed when at least one first- or second-degree relative also has HM, accounts for two-third of the cases. Sporadic HM (SHM), diagnosed in the absence of family history, accounts for one-third of cases. HM attacks begin during youth (mean age of onset 12–17 years old), and comprise motor weakness during the aura, always associated with at least one other symptom of typical aura (visual, sensory, speech and language) and often with brainstem aura symptoms (70%) [ 8 ,  9 ]. The frequency of attacks varies from more than one per week to a few over the course of a lifetime, with an average of 3 to 4 per year [ 10 ]. Duration of HM aura is often longer than that of typical aura (several days to weeks) [ 11 – 13 ]. Severe attacks with confusion, coma, fever, seizures and reversible brain edema may occur [ 14 – 17 ], sometimes triggered by mild head trauma [ 18 – 20 ]. HM can be pure or associated with a combination of early-onset epilepsy, cerebellar ataxia, learning disabilities, and/or mental retardation, which may begin before or after HM onset [ 21 – 25 ].\nFHM is primarily a monogenic disorder, with an autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance and high penetrance; 70–90% of individuals with a pathogenic mutation clinically express the disease. FHM is genetically heterogeneous and is subdivided into FHM1, FHM2 and FHM3, based on the presence of mutations in the  CACNA1A ,  ATP1A2  and  SCN1A  genes, respectively [ 6 ,  26 – 28 ] (Table  1 , Fig.  2 ). The  PRRT2  gene should be added to the main FHM genes because recent data have shown that  PRRT2  is involved at least as frequently as  SCN1A  [ 29 ,  30 ]. For convenience, we will therefore refer to FHM4 for HM associated with  PRRT2  mutations. Other genes have been reported in a small number of cases and families, and additional data are needed before they can be considered causal (Table  2 ). Table 1 The four major genes implicated in familial hemiplegic migraine Genes Approximate number of cases and families reported in the literature a Percentage of affected subjects in four cohorts: a. Sutherland et al, 2020 [ 29 ] b. Pelzer et al, 2018 [ 21 ] c. Riant et al 2022 [ 30 ] d. Hiekkala et al, 2018 [ 31 ] Nature of causative mutations Protein encoded and role Involvement of the gene in other conditions [ 32 ] FHM1: CACNA1A > 600 cases 150 families a. 16/203 (7%) b. 107/? c. 26/697 (3.7%) d. 1/293 (0.34%) Missense mutations (Gain of function) Rare large exonic deletion or deletion in 5′ non coding end promoter Alpha-1 subunit of neuronal Ca v 2.1 (P/Q type) voltage-gated calcium channels ➔ Control of neuronal excitability at the presynaptic level of glutamatergic synapsis Episodic ataxia type 2 (loss of function) Spinocerebellar ataxia type 6 (SCA6) Lennox-Gastaut syndrome or Dravet syndrome, autism spectrum disorder (gain and loss of function) Possibly involved in Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo Dyskinesia Rett syndrome Paroxysmal tonic upward gaze FHM2: ATP1A2 > 900 cases 160 families a. 20/203 (10%) b. 75/? c. 44/697 (6.3%) d. 2/293 (0.68%) Missense mutations Rare small deletions or truncating mutations, frameshift Catalytic alpha-2 subunit of the glial and neuronal ATP-dependent trans membrane Na + /K + -pump ➔ Clearance of extracellular K +  and production of a Na +  gradient necessary for glutamate reuptake Alternating hemiplegia of childhood Rapid-onset dystonia parkinsonim Cerebellar ataxia-areflexia-progressive optic atrophy Severe childhood epilepsies, encephalopathy and polymicrogyria Mental retardation FHM3: SCN1A >  120 cases 20 families a. 4/203 (1.7%) b. 26/? c. 15/697 (2.1%) d. 0/293 Missense mutations (gain of function) Alpha-1 subunit of neuronal Na v 1.1 voltage-gated sodium channels ➔ Propagation of action potentials of cortical neurons, especially in GABAergic inhibitory interneurons Early onset epileptic encephalopathies (cryptogenic generalized epilepsy, cryptogenic focal epilepsy, myoclonic–astatic epilepsy, Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, infantile spasm, Rasmussen encephalitis FMH4: PRRT2 > 120 cases 40 families a. 5/203 (2.2%) b. 1/47 (2.1%) c. 30/697 (3.5%) d. not screened Missense mutations Pre-synaptic proline-rich transmembrane protein ➔ Interaction with the synaptosomal-associated protein 25 (SNAP25), suggesting a role in the fusion of synaptic vesicles to the plasma membrane Paroxysmal kinesigenic dyskinesia Benign familial infantile epilepsy Infantile convulsions with choreoathetosis Episodic ataxia Paroxysmal torticollis Intellectual disability a Based on research on Pubmed using keywords “name of the gene (example:  CACNA1A )” and “migraine” or “name of the gene” and “headache”. Articles in other language than English, focusing on mice studies or other conditions than migraine were excluded. Each case where family history was not detailed was considered as sporadic and did not count as one family Fig. 2 Genetics of familial hemiplegic migraine (FHM). Glutamatergic synapse of the central nervous system with proteins encoded by genes involved in familial hemiplegic migraine and their functional roles.  Created with BioRender.com Table 2 Other genes potentially implicated in familial hemiplegic migraine (FHM) Genes potentially implicated Number of cases and families reported in literature Percentage of affected subjects in the cohort by Sutherland et al, 2020 [ 29 ] Protein encoded and role Involvement of the gene in other conditions References PKND 4 2 0,4% PKND protein ➔ Interaction with proteins of the synaptic termini to modulate the release of neurotransmitters Main gene for paroxysmal non-kinesigenic dyskinesia [ 33 ,  34 ] SLC4A4 15 11 3,9% Na + −HCO3 NBCe1 cotransporter ➔ Expressed in astrocytes, regulation of synaptic pH and neurotransmission Renal tubular acidosis [ 35 – 37 ] ATP1A3 3 3 0,9% α3 subunit of the Na+/K + -ATPase pump ➔ Maintain of electrochemical gradients across neuronal membranes and regulation of excitability at inhibitory synapses Alternating hemiplegia of childhood [ 38 ,  39 ] SLC1A3 4 4 0,4% EAAT1 transporter ➔ Capture of glutamate into astrocytes Episodic ataxia type 6 [ 40 – 43 ] SLC2A1 6 6 1,3% Glucose transporter GLUT1 (or EAAT2) ➔ Entry of glucose into the brain across the blood-brain barrier Paroxysmal exercise-induced dyskinesia, De Vivo disease and GLUT1 deficiency syndrome [ 33 ,  44 – 47 ] ATP1A4 15 13 5.2% Sodium/potassium-transporting ATPase subunit alpha-4 Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease, Axonal, Type 2Dd Alternating hemiplegia of childhood [ 29 ,  48 ]\nThe four major genes implicated in familial hemiplegic migraine\na. 16/203 (7%)\nb. 107/?\nc. 26/697 (3.7%)\nd. 1/293 (0.34%)\nMissense mutations (Gain of function)\nRare large exonic deletion or deletion in 5′ non coding end promoter\nAlpha-1 subunit of neuronal Ca v 2.1 (P/Q type) voltage-gated calcium channels\n➔ Control of neuronal excitability at the presynaptic level of glutamatergic synapsis\nEpisodic ataxia type 2 (loss of function)\nSpinocerebellar ataxia type 6 (SCA6)\nLennox-Gastaut syndrome or Dravet syndrome, autism spectrum disorder (gain and loss of function)\nPossibly involved in\nBenign paroxysmal positional vertigo\nDyskinesia\nRett syndrome\nParoxysmal tonic upward gaze\na. 20/203 (10%)\nb. 75/?\nc. 44/697 (6.3%)\nd. 2/293 (0.68%)\nMissense mutations\nRare small deletions or truncating mutations, frameshift\nCatalytic alpha-2 subunit of the glial and neuronal ATP-dependent trans membrane Na + /K + -pump\n➔ Clearance of extracellular K +  and production of a Na +  gradient necessary for glutamate reuptake\nAlternating hemiplegia of childhood\nRapid-onset dystonia parkinsonim\nCerebellar ataxia-areflexia-progressive optic atrophy\nSevere childhood epilepsies, encephalopathy and polymicrogyria\nMental retardation\na. 4/203 (1.7%)\nb. 26/?\nc. 15/697 (2.1%)\nd. 0/293\nAlpha-1 subunit of neuronal Na v 1.1 voltage-gated sodium channels\n➔ Propagation of action potentials of cortical neurons, especially in GABAergic inhibitory interneurons\na. 5/203 (2.2%)\nb. 1/47 (2.1%)\nc. 30/697 (3.5%)\nd. not screened\nPre-synaptic proline-rich transmembrane protein\n➔ Interaction with the synaptosomal-associated protein 25 (SNAP25), suggesting a role in the fusion of synaptic vesicles to the plasma membrane\nParoxysmal kinesigenic dyskinesia\nBenign familial infantile epilepsy\nInfantile convulsions with choreoathetosis\nEpisodic ataxia\nParoxysmal torticollis\nIntellectual disability\na Based on research on Pubmed using keywords “name of the gene (example:  CACNA1A )” and “migraine” or “name of the gene” and “headache”. Articles in other language than English, focusing on mice studies or other conditions than migraine were excluded. Each case where family history was not detailed was considered as sporadic and did not count as one family\nGenetics of familial hemiplegic migraine (FHM). Glutamatergic synapse of the central nervous system with proteins encoded by genes involved in familial hemiplegic migraine and their functional roles.  Created with BioRender.com\nOther genes potentially implicated in familial hemiplegic migraine (FHM)\nPKND protein\n➔ Interaction with proteins of the synaptic termini to modulate the release of neurotransmitters\nNa + −HCO3 NBCe1 cotransporter\n➔ Expressed in astrocytes, regulation of synaptic pH and neurotransmission\nα3 subunit of the Na+/K + -ATPase pump\n➔ Maintain of electrochemical gradients across neuronal membranes and regulation of excitability at inhibitory synapses\nEAAT1 transporter\n➔ Capture of glutamate into astrocytes\nGlucose transporter GLUT1 (or EAAT2)\n➔ Entry of glucose into the brain across the blood-brain barrier\nCharcot-Marie-Tooth Disease, Axonal, Type 2Dd\nAlternating hemiplegia of childhood\nClinical studies of patients with mutations in the four major FHM genes have shown that attacks of HM are similar regardless of the gene involved, and that prolonged auras with confusion are possible in all FHM types. The association of HM with epilepsy is present in 7% of overall HM patients [ 7 ,  49 ], but seems more frequent in FHM2 [ 50 ].\nConversely, different mutations in the same gene can influence the phenotype. In FHM1, the two mutations most commonly involved in severe attacks with coma and fever are T666M and S218L [ 17 ]. Moreover, the nature of the mutated gene also influences the spectrum of manifestations associated with HM attacks [ 6 ]. Febrile comas are frequent in FHM1 (up to 30%), possible in FHM2 (up to 15%), and have not been described in FHM3 and FHM4 [ 17 ,  51 ]. Cerebellar ataxia is common in FHM1 [ 52 – 56 ]; a phenomenon of repeated transient blindness was observed only in FHM3 [ 57 ]; mental retardation has been described in FHM1, 2 and 4 [ 22 – 24 ]; and finally, the association of HM with paroxysmal dyskinesia or hypersomnia is suggestive of FHM4 [ 30 ]. Finally, there is great variability in HM attacks and associated manifestations between individuals who carry different mutations in the same gene, and even between affected family members who carry the same mutation. This variability suggests that other genetic or environmental factors can modulate the clinical phenotype [ 26 ].\nCACNA1A , localized on 19p13, was the first identified HM gene [ 58 ]. It encodes the main α1 pore-forming subunit of the neuronal voltage-gated calcium channels Ca V 2.1 or P/Q. These channels are expressed in synaptic endings in the brain and the cerebellar, and play a role in controlling neurotransmitter release. More than 25  CACNA1A  mutations have been identified in FHM1. Most are missense mutations resulting in a gain of function, which increases Ca 2+  influx, glutamatergic neurotransmission and neuronal excitability [ 59 ].\nThere are two transgenic FHM1 knock-in (KI) mouse models [ 60 ,  61 ]. KI mice for the R192Q mutation, which causes pure FHM1, show no clinical abnormalities. KI mice for the S218L mutation, which causes very severe FHM1, show cerebellar ataxia, transient hemiparesis and epilepsy. FHM1-KI mice exhibit increased Ca V 2.1 currents and neurotransmitter release, loss of balance between excitatory and inhibitory cortical neurotransmissions, enhanced cortical excitatory transmission in visual cortex [ 62 ] and increased susceptibility to cortical spreading depression (CSD). These transgenic mice have also been shown to exhibit head pain [ 63 ], increased trigeminal activity, tissue anoxia during prolonged aura, increased sensitivity to cerebral ischemia, and altered trigeminal nociception mediated by CGRP [ 64 ].\nThe  CACNA1A  gene is also mutated in other neurological disorders. Episodic ataxia type 2 (EA2), characterized by paroxysmal ataxia, dizziness and nausea, is associated with  CACNA1A  mutations responsible for loss of function and decreased Ca 2+  influx [ 65 ]. Spinocerebellar ataxia type 6 (SCA6), characterized by progressive cerebellar ataxia, is caused by an expansion of a CAG repeat in the terminal portion of  CACNA1A , which results in toxic degeneration of cerebellar Purkinje cells [ 16 ].\nThe  ATP1A2  gene on 1q23.2 encodes the α2 isoform of the catalytic subunit of the A1A2 ATP-dependent transmembrane pump (α 2  Na + /K + -ATPase) [ 66 ]. In the CNS of adults, this pump is primarily expressed in astrocytes, where it provides extracellular K +  clearance and produces a Na +  gradient necessary for glutamate reuptake from the synaptic cleft. More than 80  ATP1A2  mutations have been identified in FHM2. Missense mutations are the most common, but small deletions, a stop-codon altering mutation, and an exonic duplication have also been reported. These mutations result in a variable loss of function of the α 2  Na + /K + -ATPase pump. The mutated pumps are reported to have lower glutamate uptake, slowing down recovery from neuronal excitation and promoting excitatory cortical transmission, thereby facilitating the initiation of CSD waves. There are several models of FHM2-KI transgenic mice. Heterozygous transgenic mice show no clinical abnormalities but have increased susceptibility to CSD [ 67 ,  68 ]. Mice with partially knock-out (KO) of  ATP1A2  also show increased susceptibility to CSD [ 69 ]. Another mouse model with complete KO of  ATP1A2  in astrocytes showed episodic paralysis and spontaneous waves of CSD with decreased EEG activity [ 70 ]. These animals had abnormalities in brain metabolism with increased serine and glycine. A serine- and glycine-free diet suppressed attacks of paralysis in these mutants.\nSCN1A  on 2q24.3 encodes the α 1  subunit forming the pore of Na V 1.1 channels [ 71 ]. These voltage-dependent neuronal sodium channels are involved in the genesis and propagation of action potentials in cortical neurons, particularly in GABAergic inhibitory interneurons [ 72 ].  SCN1A  was already known as an epilepsy gene with over 100 missense and nonsense mutations identified in various forms of childhood epilepsies. A dozen  SCN1A  mutations, mainly missense variants leading to a gain of function, have been identified in FHM3. Their functional consequences are complex [ 73 ,  74 ]. The mouse model carrying the L1649Q variant showed an increased susceptibility to CSD. The L1649Q mutation results in a defect in Na + channel inactivation with increased Na + currents and hyperactivity of inhibitory interneurons.\nPRRT2  encodes the PRRT2 protein, which plays an important role in brain development, synapse formation, and neurotransmitter release. PRRT2 is expressed in presynaptic terminals and interacts with proteins of the exocytosis complex. Mutations in  PRRT2  have now been identified in several dozen cases of FHM4, two-thirds of which have pure FHM, and one-third of which have FHM associated with epilepsy, mental retardation or dyskinesia [ 21 ,  75 – 80 ]. Mutations in  PRRT2  are also associated with several other neurological diseases, including benign familial infantile epilepsy (BFIE), infantile seizure syndrome with choreoathetosis (ICCA) and paroxysmal kinesigenic dyskinesia (PKD) [ 81 ,  82 ].\nThe different mutations in  PRRT2  (point duplication, small deletions, missense, total deletions) all induce a loss of function leading to haploinsufficiency. A given  PRRT2  mutation can be associated with several diseases. Indeed, the c.649dupC mutation is common in FHM4, but is also the main causative mutation in PKD and BFIE.\nPRRT2-KO mice exhibit paroxysmal abnormal movements upon acquisition of locomotion, develop abnormal audiogenic motor behaviors in adulthood, and have a lowered seizure threshold [ 83 ]. Their excitatory hippocampal neurons display increased excitability. Human and murine homozygous KO-PRRT2 neurons in culture express overactive Na V 1.2 and Na V 1.6 channels, indicating that PRRT2 inhibits voltage-gated sodium channels.\nFurther experiments are needed to understand the factors underlying the great phenotypical variability associated with  PRRT2  mutations, and the potential influence of modifier genes or of the non-mutated allele.\nMutations in several other genes have been identified in HM (Table  2 ) [ 29 ]. All these genes were already known to be involved in other inherited diseases. In a large cohort of index HM cases from New-Zealand and Australia, analysis of potential new HM genes increased the diagnosis rate from 21% to 27,8% ( PKND  0,4%;  SLC4A4  3,9%;  ATP1A3  0,9%;  SLC1A3  0,4%;  SLC2A1  1,3%) [ 29 ]. Analysis of other large cohorts of index cases, as well as functional studies assessing CSD in animal models would be important to confirm that these genes actually cause FHM.\nAmong index cases suspected of having HM and referred for genetic diagnosis, a minority has a mutation in one of the four major genes, 15% in a French cohort of 697 patients [ 78 ], and 21% in a New Zealand and Australian cohort of 230 patients [ 29 ]. These two independent studies yielded similar results, with the most frequent mutations found in the  ATP1A2  gene (6,3–10%) followed by  CACNA1A  (3,7–7%),  PRRT2  (2,2-3,5%) and finally,  SCN1A  (1,7 -2,1%). In contrast, a Dutch study of a cohort of 301 patients found higher rates of mutations in major genes:  CACNA1A  in 107/301 (35.5%),  ATP1A2  in 75/301 (24.9%),  SCN1A  in 26/301 (8.6%), and  PRRT2  in 1 /47 (2.1%) [ 21 ]. In addition, only three mutations were identified in a Finnish cohort of 293 HM patients: one in  CACNA1A  (0.34%) and two in  ATP1A  2(0.68%) [ 31 ]. The  PRRT2  gene was not screened in the Finnish study [ 31 ]. These differences could be due to different recruitment methods of the cohorts.\nIn typical HM cases in whom there are no mutations in the four main genes, additional single-gene variants may be identified by future systematic studies, such as exome studies, and full genome sequencing. New variants with large-effect sizes are expected to be involved in only a small proportion of familial and sporadic cases. In other cases of HM, the inheritance may be polygenic, involving multiple variants with each a small-effect size, or oligogenic, with a combination of one or few variants with a moderate-effect size with or without multiple pro-migraine variants of small-effect size.\nSHM, diagnosed in the absence of any affected relative, can result from a de novo mutation of one of the FHM genes in a subject whose two parents do not have a mutation [ 47 ,  84 – 88 ]. These de novo mutations can be passed to offspring, transforming SHM into FHM. SHM can also result from mutations in known FHM genes with low penetrance, mosaicism in the transmitting parent, or pathogenic variants in as yet unknown genes. Other SHM types might have a different mode of inheritance, either recessive with compound heterozygotes or polygenic [ 26 ]. Finally, environmental and psychosocial factors including exposure to stress, psychological and physical trauma, abuse, or negative life events may also play an important role in SHM. According to the US military personnel HM cohort, the incidence of HM was zero from 1997 to 2007, and then steadily increased, with a 25-fold increase in new cases between 2008 and 2017 [ 89 ].\nFHM is a model of hereditary severe migraine with aura. Some authors have suggested that the mechanisms of FHM, namely increased sensitivity to CSD, may be involved in common migraine, with and without aura. Danish studies have shown that the risk of migraine with typical aura (eg without motor deficit) was increased in individuals with FHM compared with the general population, whereas the risk of MO was similar [ 90 ,  91 ]. Thus, FHM is a major model for migraine aura associated with cortical excitability, with subsequent headache triggered by CSD, and FHM genes do not play a major role in the genetics of the common varieties of migraine [ 92 ,  93 ]. A recent study has identified a polymorphism in the FHM1  CACNA1A  gene as a susceptibility locus for common varieties of migraine, among 122 other loci [ 94 ].\n\nTRESK is a two-pore K +  channel responsible for maintaining membrane excitability. By a free flow of K +  ions, it contributes to the formation of leakage currents in the trigeminal ganglion and dorsal root ganglia. It is therefore though to play a role in pain processing mechanisms. Mice with a functional knock-out of TRESK show a ‘painful’ behavioural phenotype, and exhibit hyperexcitability of the dorsal root and trigeminal ganglia. In addition, in the trigeminal ganglion, TRESK expression is restricted to nociceptive neurons [ 5 ,  95 ].\nA frameshift mutation in  KCNK18 , which encodes the TRESK channel, was described in a large family with visual MwA following autosomal dominant inheritance [ 96 ]. All family members with migraine carried the p.(F139Wfs*24) mutation, which has been shown to exert a dominant negative effect resulting in complete loss of TRESK function and increased neuronal excitability [ 97 ].\nThe causal link between TRESK mutations and migraine has been called into question by the discovery of another mutation with a dominant negative effect, C110R, in individuals without migraine [ 98 ]. However, further research revealed that the p.(F139Wfs*24) variant introduces an alternative start codon that shortens the TRESK protein and damages its function resulting in hyperexcitability of nociceptors. Such effects were not observable for C110R [ 97 ,  99 ]. Another missense mutation in the KCNK18 gene (W101R) was identified in a 12-year-old male with migraine with brainstem aura and intellectual disability. This variant was inherited from his mother, who had migraine with aura [ 100 ]. Further investigations revealed impaired TRESK channel function associated with this variant [ 101 ]. In another study, pharmacological inhibition of TRESK influenced the response to capsaicin, a TRPV1 receptor agonist, and resulted in increased CGRP release and meningeal blood flow [ 102 ]. These data suggested that MwA can be caused by a rare genetic variant inducing a major functional effect.\nA study of 200,000 exome-sequenced UK Biobank participants conducted in 2022 found the frameshift variant p.(F139Wfs*24) in 196 (0.10%) of the 193,433 participants classified as controls and in 10 (0.14%) of the 7194 migraine cases ( p  = 0.33) [ 103 ]. The authors concluded that  KCNK18  should no longer be regarded as being involved in migraine etiology. A major limitation of this study is that the clinical status of healthy controls was not assessed in details. This may imply that a proportion of the 193,433 participants may in fact have been affected by migraine, as mis- and underdiagnosis of migraine and migraine aura is highly common [ 104 ]. Studies of cohorts of patients with a firm diagnosis of MwA and well characterized healthy controls are needed to further elucidate the role of  KCNK18  and its product, TRESK in migraine.\nFASPS, which causes an extreme tendency to wake-up early in the morning, can be caused by mutation in a circadian clock gene,  CSNK1D , which codes for casein kinase 1 delta (CKIδ). In the two large families with a CKIδ mutation, the sleep disorder was associated with migraine [ 105 ]. Transgenic mice expressing T44A variant of  CSNK1D  displayed a high propensity for nitroglycerin-induced mechanical hyperalgesia, and a reduced threshold for CSD. These findings suggest that migraine may be caused by a mutation in a gene that encodes neither an ion channel nor a protein involved in glutamate signaling. In addition, the link between migraine and FASPS is consistent with the known role of hypothalamus in migraine [ 106 ,  107 ].\nROSAH syndrome (retinal dystrophy, optic nerve edema, splenomegaly, anhidrosis, migraine headache) is an autosomal dominant condition caused by a missense mutation in the  ALPK1  gene which was identified in five families.  ALPK1  encodes Alpha Kinase 1, which plays a role in inflammation, cellular trafficking, and possibly also affects CGRP activity [ 26 ,  108 ]. Its role in migraine is unknown.\nCADASIL (Cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy) is the commonest type of familial cerebral small-vessel disease responsible for recurrent lacunar stroke, leading to dementia and premature death [ 27 ,  109 ]. CADASIL is caused by  NOTCH3  mutations, which cause progressive destruction of vascular smooth muscle cells [ 110 ]. Migraine is very common in CADASIL (up to 75%), mainly migraine with typical aura, but also hemiplegic migraine or migraine without aura. Migraine is often the first manifestation of the disease, 15 to 20 years before cerebral infarctions [ 111 ,  112 ]. Mutant mice, either knock-in for a CADASIL mutation or  NOTCH3 -knock-out, have shown increased sensitivity to CSD [ 113 ].\nRetinal vasculopathy with cerebral leukodystrophy (RVCL) caused by mutations in  TREX1 , and disorders due to  COL4A1  and  COL4A2  mutations are other small-vessel diseases that frequently involve migraines [ 27 ].\nThe study of these conditions, especially CADASIL, showed that gene expressed only in vessels could be implicated in migraine, which was later on confirmed by studies in polygenic migraines.\n\nIdentification of gene variants involved in migraine has proven difficult, and there have been 30 years of studies without significant results. Because MO and MwA display strong familial aggregation, which may suggest Mendelian inheritance, the initial hope was that the techniques used successfully in FHM would identify the genes for the most common migraines. Initial studies showed that the FHM genes were not involved in the common varieties of MO and MwA. Linkage analysis studies identified dozens of loci that were presented as possibly containing genes involved in migraine, but these were never discovered [ 5 ,  114 ].\nResearchers turned to genome-wide association study (GWAS), which examines millions of polymorphisms called SNPs (single nucleotide polymorphisms) in very large cohorts of patients and healthy controls. Each SNP is a variation in the genetic code at a single DNA base pair. More than 100 million SNPs exist in the human genome, and 4–5 million SNPs are distributed throughout an individual genome [ 115 ]. A GWAS identifies SNPs that are significantly associated with the disease of interest, by assessing differences in allele frequencies between large numbers of patients and controls. For each SNP, the level of significance is very difficult to reach (5 × 10 − 8 ) because of the multiplicity of tests performed.\nIn 2010, the first GWAS identified a single migraine susceptibility locus [ 116 ] (Table  3 ) Over the past decade, the International Headache Genetics Consortium (IHGC;  www.headachegenetics.org/ ) has conducted several migraine GWAS, and with increasing sample sizes, the number of associated genetic variants has progressively increased [ 117 – 119 ]. The 2016 migraine GWAS, including 59,674 migraine sufferers and 316,078 controls, identified 38 distinct genomic loci associated with migraine [ 120 ]. Tissue expression enrichment analyzes clearly demonstrated the enrichment in genes involved in arterial and smooth-muscle function [ 120 ,  121 ]. The other pathways identified were the neuronal pathway [ 122 ], and the pathway related to homeostasis of iron ions and other metals [ 120 ]. Table 3 Genome wide association studies in migraine from 2010 to 2022 Article Population Number of SNPs tested Number of loci identified, P  < 5 × 10 −8 Number of new loci, P  < 5 × 10 − 8 Genes or nearest genes Origin Migraine (n) MO (n) MwA + MO (n) MwA only (n) Controls (n) Antilla et al., 2010 [ 116 ] Europeans 2748 17 2142 589 10,747 429,912 1 12 a 1 12 a Intergenic between MTDH/AEG-1 and PGCP MTDH/AEG-1 PGCP, SMYD3, INSIG2, TRPM8, MYLK4, ZNF311, NAV2, COG3, SGCZ, AQP9 . a Ligthart et al., 2011 [ 123 ] Europeans 2446 NA NA NA 8534 2,394,913 0 10 a 0 10 a - NGFR, AGBL1, MACC1, LIPG, AGA, KIF20B, BMP2, IGLL1, TSPAN2, KDM4C. a Chasman et al., 2012        [ 117 ] American women with European ancestry 5122 1826 1177 18,108 2,608,509 0 7 b 0 7 b - PRDM16, TRPM8, SEPT7, C8orf79, LRP1 . b Freilinger et al., 2012        [ 124 ] Europeans 2326 2326 0 0 4580 Approximately 1.4 M 1 12 a 1 12 a MEF2D MEF2D, HFM1, RABGAP1L, MARCH4, TGFBR2, RGS12, PHACTR1, FHL5, ADAM28, ASTN2, INA, MMP17 . a Anttila et al., 2013 [ 118 ] European descent 23,285 7107 5118 95,425 Approximately 2.3 M 12 5 AJAP1, TSPAN2, FHL5, c7orf10, MMP16, PRDM16, MEF2D, TRPM8, TGFBR2, PHACTR1, ASTN2, LRP1. Gormley et al., 2016        [ 120 ] European descent 59,674 8348 6332 316,078 8,045,569 38 28 LRP1/STAT6/SDR9C7, PRDM16, FHL5/UFL1, TSPAN2/NGF, TRPM8/HJURP, PHACTR1, MEF2D, SLC24A3, FGF6, C7orf10, PLCE1, KCNK5, ASTN2, MRVI1, HPSE2, CFDP1, RNF213, NRP1, SPR149, JAG1, REST/SPINK2, ZCCHC14, HEY2/NCOA7, WSCD1/NLRP1, GJA1, TGFBR2, ITPK1, ADAMTSL4/ECM1, CCM2L/HCK, YAP1, MED14/USP9X, DOCK4/IMMP2L, CARF, ARMS2/HTRA1, IGSF9B, MPPED2, NOTCH4. Chen et al., 2017 [ 125 ] Asians (Han Chinese) 1005 1005 0 0 1053 642,832 0 4 c 0 4 c - DLG2, GFRA1, UPP2, GPR39. c Chang et al., 2018 [ 126 ] African-Americans 380 123 40 2129 522,471 1 1 Near NMUR2 and GLRA1 Choquet et al., 2021 [ 127 ] Multiethnic (East Asian, African American, Hispanic/Latino, European descent) 88,526 NA NA NA 841,795 Over 10 M 79 45 JAG1, LEPR, REST, HEY2, NGF, TGFB1, HOXB3, LRP1, PLCE1, HOXB2, HOXB6, YAP1, POLR2A, AMBRA1, TJP2, EP300, LRP4, ARHGAP1, ECM1, HOXB5, HOXB1, MRVI1, ZC3H7B, HTRA1, RPRD2, ZCCHC14, STAT6, MAPKAPK2, C7orf10, KCNK5, C20orf112, ZBTB4, POU4F1, C14orf37, IQCK, C1orf51, LINC00472, BTBD16, MPPED2, YRDC, PRPF3, ARID4A, GPRC5B, THADA, ZNF408, TMEM51, CHRNB1, CHST6, MTF1, MEF2D, INPP5B, CKAP5, RNF213, DGKZ, TSPAN2, CFDP1, KIAA0586, FHL5, ATG13, TIMM9, F2, PSMA3, GPR26, PLEKHA1, TMEM170A, PHB, SLC24A3, L3MBTL2, TARS2, DYRK3, MRPS21, FXN, CHRM4, TMEM91, CHADL, MANEAL, HARBI1, RANGAP1, IER3IP1, UFL1, C1orf122, TRPM8, PHACTR1, ACTR10, NCOA7, C11orf49, PRDM16, SLC45A1-RERE, TMEM51, TSPAN2-NGF, MSL3P1-TRPM8, MIR4791-EFHB, LINC00472-RIMS1, GJA1-HSF2, FXN, ASTN2-LOC100128505, GATA3-SFTA1P, MRGPRE-ZNF195, CALCB, FGF23-FGF6, LRP1-MIR1228, B3GNTL1-METRNL, LINC00310-KCNE2. Hautakangas et al., 2022     [ 94 ] Europeans 102,084 15,055 14,624 771,257 10,843,197 123 86 PRDM16, CAMTA1, TMEM51, INPP5B, MACF1, C1orf87, LEPR, RP4-598G3.1, TGFBR3, TSPAN2, ADAMTSL4, MEF2D, RABGAP1L, PLA2G4A, MAPKAPK2, KIF26B, THADA, ANKRD36C, ZEB2,  AC064865.1 , RNU6-546P, MYO3B, HOXD10, CARF, TRPM8, TGFBR2, ATRIP, HNRNPA3P8, CADM2, C3orf38, ITGB5, GPR149, SEC63P2, SPINK2, ANKDD1B, SSBP2, ZNF474, SNX24, POU4F3, TIGD6|HMGXB3, NKX2–5, NSD1, PHACTR1, PRL, IER3, EHMT2, KCNK5, KRT19P1, FHL5, REV3L, GJA1, PCMT1, SUGCT, MLXIPL, TSPAN12, PTK2B, RP11-573 J24.1, NFIB, RP11-373A6.1, TJP2, ZNF462, ASTN2, EHMT1, RNA5SP299, MLLT10, PLCE1, HPSE2, CNNM2, RBM20, HTRA1, GPR26, INPP5A, MRGPRE, MRVI1, INSC, MPPED2, AMBRA1, RAB3IL1, RBM14-RBM4|RBM4, YAP1, SPATA19, FGF6, PDZRN4, LRP1, ATP2B1, RP11-690 J15.1, NCOR2, LRCH1, RNF219-AS1, COL4A1, RP11-384 J4.2, LRFN5, ARID4A, DLST, IFT43, ITPK1, SERPINA1, ABHD17C, HMOX2, CFDP1, ZCCHC14, SMG6, ZBTB4, HOXB3, RP11-81 K2.1, MRC2, TBC1D16, RNF213, RBBP8, SKOR2, FECH, CACNA1A, SUGP1, B9D2|TMEM91, JAG1, SLC24A3, C20orf112, ZMYND8, MRPS6, RUNX1, AC006547.14, FAM47A, MED14 MO  Migraine without aura,  MwA  Migraine with Aura,  M  Millions,  NA  Non Applicable,  SNPs  Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms a Significant association with  p -values ≤5 × 10 − 5 b Significant association with  p -values ≤5 × 10 − 6 c Significant association with  p -values ≤5 × 10 − 4\nGenome wide association studies in migraine from 2010 to 2022\n1\n12 a\n1\n12 a\nIntergenic between MTDH/AEG-1 and PGCP\nMTDH/AEG-1 PGCP, SMYD3, INSIG2, TRPM8, MYLK4, ZNF311, NAV2, COG3, SGCZ, AQP9 . a\n0\n10 a\n0\n10 a\n-\nNGFR, AGBL1, MACC1, LIPG, AGA, KIF20B, BMP2, IGLL1, TSPAN2, KDM4C. a\n0\n7 b\n0\n7 b\n-\nPRDM16, TRPM8, SEPT7, C8orf79, LRP1 . b\n1\n12 a\n1\n12 a\nMEF2D\nMEF2D, HFM1, RABGAP1L, MARCH4, TGFBR2, RGS12, PHACTR1, FHL5, ADAM28, ASTN2, INA, MMP17 . a\n0\n4 c\n0\n4 c\n-\nDLG2, GFRA1, UPP2, GPR39. c\nMO  Migraine without aura,  MwA  Migraine with Aura,  M  Millions,  NA  Non Applicable,  SNPs  Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms\na Significant association with  p -values ≤5 × 10 − 5\nb Significant association with  p -values ≤5 × 10 − 6\nc Significant association with  p -values ≤5 × 10 − 4\nIn a third recent migraine GWAS from 2021, 79 independent loci were significantly associated with migraine [ 127 ]. Of note, this was an ethnically diverse study that included adult individuals (28,852 cases vs. 525,717 controls) from East Asian, African American, and Hispanic/Latino descent.\nThe most recent migraine GWAS published in 2022 by Hautakangas et al. [ 94 ] included 102,084 cases and 771,257 controls and identified 123 distinct loci associated with migraine, of which 86 were novel compared to the 2016 GWAS. Additional analyses even increased the number of independent SNPs to 167. Enrichment analyses in the 2022 migraine GWAS clearly pointed to both vascular and central nervous system tissues and cell types. The newly identified loci involve genes encoding known migraine drug targets, namely calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP, encoded by  CALCA/CALCB), ) and serotonin 1F receptor ( HTR1F ). The former is the target for CGRP antibodies, and the latter for ditans. In addition, an analysis of about 30,000 patients from the 2022 GWAS with a precise diagnosis of the type of migraine (eg, MO or MwA) showed that three risk variants were specific for MwA (including a SNP in  CACNA1A  the FHM1 gene), two were specific for MO and nine were associated with both types.\nGiven that some risk loci were found in the Hautakangas 2022 GWAS only, some in the Choquet 2021 GWAS only, and some in both studies, there are now about 180 migraine risk loci.\nIn addition to these large GWAS including mainly cases with European ancestries, other smaller GWAS conducted in Asia replicated some of the results obtained in European cases and yielded other new SNPs [ 128 ]. Another GWAS study conducted in Asian population identified eight novel susceptibility loci correlated with age of migraine onset [ 129 ].\nAltogether, migraine GWAS have identified more than 180 low-effect-size genetic variants all across the genome, with enrichment in vascular and neuronal cells/tissues, confirming that migraine is a polygenic neurovascular disorder. Recent GWAS demonstrated that all migraine varieties share common molecular mechanisms, and that MO and MwA have specific genetic risk factors and distinct mechanisms. Due to the large size of the samples, clinical data in GWAS were limited and did not permit to study other migraine varieties, such as “pure” MwA (patients having only attacks of MwA and never MO) or chronic MO.\nFuture studies will have to determine which are the causal genes modified by the SNPs, which are mostly located in non-coding regions, and do not necessarily affect the closest gene. A first challenging step will be to select the list of most-likely causal genes based on GWAS results. For example, the intronic SNP rs9349379 near  PHACTR1  is a proven risk loci for migraine, coronary artery disease, fibromuscular dysplasia, hypertension and cervical artery dissection [ 130 ]. A functional study showed that this SNP had no effect on  PHACTR1  but on the gene encoding endothelin-1 (ET-1; EDN1), a strong vascular smooth muscle cells constrictor located 600 kB upstream of the risk SNP [ 130 ]. More recent data suggested that SNP rs9349379 may in fact regulate the expression of  PHACTR1 , and not  EDN1 , and that  PHACTR1  could have a role in arterial compliance [ 131 ]. This debate on a single SNP shows that enormous amounts of experiments will be necessary to study the 180 migraine SNPs.\nIn addition, some variants not identified by the mean of GWAS could also be implicated in migraine susceptibility through gene-gene interactions. A case-control study suggested that synergetic effects between a variant in  NRXN2 , coding a component of the synaptic vesicle machinery, and two other genes,  GABRE  and  CASK,  were associated with migraine [ 132 ].\nThe almost 200 variants identified by the latest GWAS each explain only a small fraction of the genetic risk, and their sum do not explain the full heritability of migraine. The Polygenic Risk Score (PRS) assesses the individual genetic risk of migraine as the sum of all SNPs and alleles that increase the risk of migraine carried by an individual. The PRS may be used to analyze the genetic links between the different primary headaches and the different forms of migraine, and between migraine and its comorbidities. The PRS can also assess pharmacogenetic effects [ 5 ].\nIn a study of 1589 migraine sufferers from the Finnish population, familial cases had a significantly higher PRS than non-familial cases [ 133 ]. The genetic burden was higher in MwA and FHM compared to MO, and was associated with an earlier age of onset of migraine. These data show that migraine is primarily due to an accumulation of minor variants that produce a favorable (pro-migraine) genetic background, and not to highly deleterious single gene mutations. Noteworthy, a recent study using a PRS derived from 38,872 variants associated with migraine in 8602 subjects in Finland showed a correlation between PRS and migraine diagnoses according to ICHD3 criteria [ 134 ]. Non-headache, non-migraine headache, probable migraine, migraine headache, migraine with typical visual aura and hemiplegic migraine formed a continuum along the increasing PRS, which paves the way for the potential concept of genetic classifications [ 134 ].\nThe known small-effect-size pro-migraine variants do not explain the full heritability of migraine. The “missing heritability” may be explained by several hypothesis. First, there are probably hundreds of other small-effect-size variants, which increase the risk of migraine but fall below the required levels of significance in GWAS. Second, persons with multiple disease associated SNPs may have an additive effect conferring a greater overall risk. Third, technical limitations in short read sequencing and Sanger analyses may account for part of this “missing heritability”. Finally, variants with minor or moderate-effect-size probably explain a part of the missing heritability, and cannot be identified by GWAS. A study sequenced the genomic areas associated with migraine in a large cohort of patients and identified four rare variants altering regulatory areas close to four variants discovered by GWAS [ 135 ]. Another study analyzed RNA sequencing using a coexpression network of aorta, trigeminal ganglion and visual cortex, combined with a whole sequence genoming. The authors identified a ‘gene module’, a set of coexpressed genes, in the visual cortex that had increased mutations in migraine. Pathway analysis of this module revealed association with hormonal signaling, Alzheimer’s disease, serotonin receptors and heterotrimeric G protein signaling pathway. Noteworthy, mutations in two genes involved in glutamate signalling,  CACNA1B  and  ATXN1 , were found in several migraine families [ 136 ]. Using whole-exome sequencing in small populations, new SNPs have been associated with responsiveness to verapamil as a preventive therapy [ 137 ], and neurological outcome, including migraine, after head trauma [ 138 ]. Finally, “private” large-size-effect variants may be identified by chance, such as in the very rare families carrying mutations of  KCNK18  or  CSNK1D . In these families, the strong penetrance of the migraine phenotype could result from the cosegregation of the “private” large-size-effect mutation and a pro-migraine genetic background due to a high PRS, whereas most carriers of the same rare variant would not express a migraine phenotype thanks to a non-permissive genetic background. Some authors have even hypothesized that FHM would not be truly autosomal dominant but the result of a rare mutation on a pro-migraine background.\nThe genetics of migraine thus seems very complex, based on the interaction of hundreds of common small-effect-size variants with rare variants affecting regulatory areas, and with possible “private” moderate to large-effect-size variants.\nThe comorbidities of migraine are diseases whose prevalence is increased in migraine sufferers compared to controls and for which certain pathological mechanisms could be shared (Fig.  3 ). Genetics is a tool to explore some of the common mechanisms, firstly by identification of genes associated with both conditions (GWAS), secondly, by estimation of the genetic correlation, namely the proportion of variance the two conditions share due to genetics (genetic correlation studies), and finally, by evaluation of causal relationships between two conditions by using genetic variants as proxies of an exposure (Mendelian randomization [MR] studies) [ 5 ,  139 ]. Fig. 3 Shared genetic background of migraine and its comorbid diseases. Genetic relation of migraine and some of its clinically most relevant comorbidities. Dotted arrow: Genetic association or correlation as demonstrated by GWAS or genetic correlation studies. Solid arrow: Causal association of genetic variants as demonstrated by Mendelian randomization studies. +, liability to one disease increases risk for the comorbidity; −, liability to one disease decreases risk for the comorbidity; ADHD, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder; BP, blood pressure; CAD, coronary artery disease; CeAD, cervical artery dissection.  Created with BioRender.com\nShared genetic background of migraine and its comorbid diseases. Genetic relation of migraine and some of its clinically most relevant comorbidities. Dotted arrow: Genetic association or correlation as demonstrated by GWAS or genetic correlation studies. Solid arrow: Causal association of genetic variants as demonstrated by Mendelian randomization studies. +, liability to one disease increases risk for the comorbidity; −, liability to one disease decreases risk for the comorbidity; ADHD, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder; BP, blood pressure; CAD, coronary artery disease; CeAD, cervical artery dissection.  Created with BioRender.com\nWith regard to genetic studies of associations and correlations, several large studies based on the comparison of GWAS data have shown the existence of a shared genetic susceptibility between migraine and various disorders, including psychiatric disorders [ 140 ,  141 ], ischemic stroke [ 142 ], coronary artery disease [ 143 ], hypertension [ 144 ,  145 ], sleep disorders [ 146 ], and also endometriosis [ 147 ], fibromuscular dysplasia [ 148 ], type 2 diabetes, hyperlipidemia, autoimmune diseases, asthma, other respiratory conditions [ 144 ], restless legs syndrome [ 149 ] and hemostatic profile [ 150 ]. In contrast, one study found no causal link between genetic susceptibility to migraine and Alzheimer’s disease, intelligence, and brain size [ 151 ].\nMendelian randomization studies have provided evidence of causal associations between genetic variants predisposing for migraine and those predisposing for some of the above-mentioned conditions. Findings of Mendelian randomization studies on migraine and comorbid conditions are summarized in Table  4 . Table 4 Mendelian randomization studies for causal associations of genetic variants predisposing for migraine and its comorbid disorders and traits Comorbidity/Trait Number of patients included Direction of causality examined Main finding(s) Reference Migraine Comorbidity/Trait Cardio−/vascular comorbidities Ischemic Stroke GERA cohort, UK Biobank and International Headache Genetics Consortium: 85,726 migraine cases and 803,292 controls MEGASTROKE consortium: 40,585 cases and 406,111 controls One-directional No causal associations of migraine and ischemic stroke Shu et al. [ 152 ] Stroke (ischemic and hemorrhagic) International Headache Genetics Consortium: Any migraine: 59,674 cases and 316,078 controls MwA: 6332 cases and 144,883 controls MO: 8348 cases and 139,622 controls MEGASTROKE consortium: All stroke: 40,585 cases and 406,111 controls Ischemic stroke: 34,217 cases and 406,111 controls Hemorrhagic stroke: 3223 cases and 3725 controls One-directional No causal association of migraine and stroke, ischemic stroke, and hemorrhagic stroke Migraine liability possibly associated with decreased large-artery atherosclerosis risk Lee et al. [ 153 ] Stroke and Cervical Artery Dissection International Headache Genetics Consortium: Any migraine: 59,674 cases and 316,078 controls MwA: 6332 cases and 144,883 controls MO: 8348 cases and 139,622 controls MEGASTROKE consortium: CeAD: 1393 cases and 14,416 controls All stroke: 40,585 cases and 406,111 controls Ischemic stroke: 34,217 cases and 406,111 controls Large artery stroke: 4373 cases and 297,290 controls Cardioembolic stroke: 7193 cases and 355,68 controls Small vessel stroke: 5386 cases and 343,560 controls One-directional Migraine liability associated with increased risk for CeAD Migraine liability associated with decreased risk of large artery stroke Daghlas et al. [ 154 ] Coronary artery disease and atrial fibrillation International Headache Genetics Consortium: 59,674 migraine cases and 316,078 controls Coronary artery disease: 76,014 cases and 264,785 controls Myocardial infarction: 43,676 cases and 128,199 controls Angina: 10,618 cases and 326,065 controls Atrial fibrillation: 60,620 and 970,216 One-directional Migraine liability associated with decreased risk of coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, and angina, but not on atrial fibrillation Daghlas et al. [ 143 ] Blood pressure International Headache Genetics Consortium: 59,674 cases and 316,078 controls 757,601 Bidirectional Genetically predicted elevated DBP and SBP, and decreased PP associated with increased migraine risk Migraine liability associated with increased SBP and PP, but not DBP Guo et al. [ 145 ] Forty-seven traits from the UK Biobank International Headache Genetics Consortium: 59,674 cases and 316,078 controls UK Biobank and a combined meta-analysis: for DBP  n  > 1 million individuals One-directional Genetically predicted elevated DBP associated with increased migraine risk Siewert et al. [ 144 ] Cardiovascular risk factors and lifestyle Alcohol, coffee consumption, smoking 7759 cases and 504,902 controls FinnGen study: 6687 cases and 144,780 controls UK Biobank: 1072 cases and 360,122 controls Bidirectional Genetically predicted alcohol and coffee consumption inversely associated with migraine risk, smoking initiation associated with increased migraine risk Migraine liability inversely associated with alcohol consumption, not associated with coffee consumption or smoking initiation Yuan et al. [ 155 ] Coffee consumption MwA: 6332 cases and 144,883 controls MO: 8348 cases and 139,622 controls UK Biobank: 375,833 participants One-directional Genetically predicted increase of coffee consumption not associated with the risk of any migraine, MwA or MO Chen et al. [ 156 ] Smoking HUNT study: 7522 cases and 35,342 controls One-directional No causal relationship between smoking intensity and migraine Johnsen et al. [ 157 ] Brain morphometry and cognition Cognition and brain volume International Headache Genetics Consortium: 59,674 migraine cases and 316,078 controls Alzheimer’s disease: 71,880 cases and 383,378 controls Measure of general intelligence: 269,867 subjects Measure of intracranial volume: 11,373 subjects Seven subcortical brain volumes ∼ 13,000 subjects One-directional Migraine liability not associated with Alzheimer’s disease, intelligence, or any brain volume measures Daghlas et al. [ 151 ] Brain morphometry International Headache Genetics Consortium: 59,674 migraine patients vs 316,078 controls ENIGMA and CHARGE consortia, UK biobank, ABCD cohort: 66,000 participants Bidirectional Genetically determined smaller total brain, hippocampal and ventral diencephalon volume possibly associated with increased migraine risk Migraine liability associated with larger volume of the amygdala Mitchell et al. [ 158 ] Sleep disorders Insomnia finn-a-G6_MIGRAINE: 3650 migraine cases and 83,167 controls UK Biobank: 13,597 migraine cases and 449,336 controls UK Biobank: 462,341 participants Bidirectional Genetically determined insomnia significantly associated with increased migraine risk Migraine liability not associated with insomnia risk Chu et al. [ 159 ] Sleep disturbances International Headache Genetics Consortium: 59,674 cases and 316,078 controls UK Biobank: ≥ 237,627 participants Bidirectional Difficulty awakening and liability to insomnia symptoms associated with increased risk of migraine Migraine liability slightly associated with increased napping frequency Daghlas et al. [ 146 ] Gastroenterological conditions Irritable bowel syndrome UK Biobank: 1072 cases and 360,122 controls 1121 cases and 360,073 controls One-directional Genetically determined irritable bowel syndrome associated with increased migraine risk Chen et al. [ 160 ] Gynecological conditions Endometriosis International Headache Genetics Consortium: 59,674 migraine cases and 316,078 controls 17,054 cases (all stages of endometriosis) and 191,858 controls One-directional No causal association Adewuyi et al. [ 147 ] Laboratory parameters Clinical chemistry tests (HDL-C, LDL-C, TG, iron, diseases of liver) 29,209 cases and 172,931 controls Chemistry test values and data on medically relevant disorders from 23,986 to 452,264 participants One-directional No causal associations Tanha et al. [ 161 ] Seventy-nine metabolic traits International Headache Genetics Consortium: 59,674 migraine cases and 316,078 controls From 6263 to 24,925 Bidirectional Genetically predicted shorter length of fatty acids and higher level of a lysophosphatidylethanolamine, LPE(20:4) associated with increased migraine risk Tanha et al. [ 162 ] Nineteen lipoprotein subfractions International Headache Genetics Consortium: 54,552 cases and 297,970 controls 47,713 participants Bidirectional Lipoprotein subfractions not causally related with migraine Guo et al. [ 163 ] Serum calcium International Headache Consortium: 23,285 cases and 95,425 controls 39,400 participants One-directional Genetically predicted increase in serum calcium levels associated with increased migraine liability Yin et al. [ 164 ] Twelve blood-based measures of hemostasis International Headache Genetics Consortium: 59,674 cases and 316,078 controls CHARGE Consortium Hemostasis Working Group: n  = 2583 to  n  = 120,246 Bidirectional Increased FVIII, vWF, and phosphorylated fibrinopeptide A and decreased fibrinogen associated with increased migraine risk (especially MA) Migraine liability not associated with measures of hemostasis Guo et al. [ 150 ] Vitamine D Levels GWAS 1 (Hautakangas et al.): 48,975 cases and 540,381 controls GWAS 2 (Choquet et al.): 28,852 cases and 525,717 controls GWAS 3 (FinnGen): 10,536 cases and 208,845 controls UK Biobank 417,580 participants Bidirectional Genetically determined increase in circulating vitamin D levels associated with a decreased migraine risk Migraine not associated with vitamin D levels Niu et al. [ 165 ] Circulating Insulin-Like Growth Factor 1 Levels GWAS 1 (FinnGen): 10,536 cases and 208,845 controls GWAS 2 (Choquet et al.): 28,852 cases and 554,569 controls UK Biobank 363,228 participants Bidirectional Genetically determined increase in IGF1 levels associated with decreased risk of migraine Migraine not associated with IGF1 levels Abuduxukuer et al. [ 166 ] DNA methylation International Headache Genetics Consortium: 59,674 cases and 316,078 controls DNA methylation quantitative trait loci from whole blood,  n  = 639 and fetal brain,  n  = 166 One-directional Not provided Hannon et al. [ 167 ] Socioeconomic outcomes School absence and educational attainment Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children: 6113 participants One-directional Migraine liability not associated with school absence or educational attainment in childhood and adolescence Hughes et al. [ 168 ] Nineteen social and socioeconomic outcomes UK Biobank: 10,603 cases, 326,394 controls One-directional Migraine liability associated with reduced chance of having a weekly leisure or social activity Harrison et al. [ 169 ]\nMendelian randomization studies for causal associations of genetic variants predisposing for migraine and its comorbid disorders and traits\nGERA cohort, UK Biobank and International Headache Genetics Consortium: 85,726 migraine cases and\n803,292 controls\nInternational Headache Genetics Consortium:\nAny migraine: 59,674 cases and 316,078 controls\nMwA: 6332 cases and 144,883 controls\nMO: 8348 cases and 139,622 controls\nMEGASTROKE consortium:\nAll stroke: 40,585 cases and 406,111 controls\nIschemic stroke: 34,217 cases and 406,111 controls\nHemorrhagic stroke: 3223 cases and 3725 controls\nNo causal association of migraine and stroke, ischemic stroke, and hemorrhagic stroke\nMigraine liability possibly associated with decreased large-artery atherosclerosis risk\nInternational Headache Genetics Consortium:\nAny migraine: 59,674 cases and 316,078 controls\nMwA: 6332 cases and 144,883 controls\nMO: 8348 cases and 139,622 controls\nMEGASTROKE consortium:\nCeAD: 1393 cases and 14,416 controls\nAll stroke: 40,585 cases and 406,111 controls\nIschemic stroke: 34,217 cases and 406,111 controls\nLarge artery stroke: 4373 cases and 297,290 controls Cardioembolic stroke: 7193 cases and 355,68 controls\nSmall vessel stroke: 5386 cases and 343,560 controls\nMigraine liability associated with increased risk for CeAD\nMigraine liability associated with decreased risk of large artery stroke\nCoronary artery disease: 76,014 cases and 264,785 controls\nMyocardial infarction: 43,676 cases and 128,199 controls\nAngina: 10,618 cases and 326,065 controls\nAtrial fibrillation: 60,620 and 970,216\nGenetically predicted elevated DBP and SBP, and decreased PP associated with increased migraine risk\nMigraine liability associated with increased SBP and PP, but not DBP\nUK Biobank and a combined meta-analysis:\nfor DBP  n  > 1 million individuals\n7759 cases and 504,902 controls\nFinnGen study: 6687 cases and 144,780 controls\nUK Biobank: 1072 cases and 360,122 controls\nGenetically predicted alcohol and coffee consumption inversely associated with migraine risk, smoking initiation associated with increased migraine risk\nMigraine liability inversely associated with alcohol consumption, not associated with coffee consumption or smoking initiation\nMwA: 6332 cases and 144,883 controls\nMO: 8348 cases and 139,622 controls\nUK Biobank:\n375,833 participants\nAlzheimer’s disease: 71,880 cases and 383,378 controls Measure of general intelligence: 269,867 subjects\nMeasure of intracranial volume: 11,373 subjects\nSeven subcortical brain volumes ∼ 13,000 subjects\nInternational Headache Genetics Consortium:\n59,674 migraine patients vs 316,078 controls\nGenetically determined smaller total brain, hippocampal and ventral diencephalon volume possibly associated with increased migraine risk\nMigraine liability associated with larger volume of the amygdala\nfinn-a-G6_MIGRAINE: 3650 migraine cases and 83,167 controls\nUK Biobank: 13,597 migraine cases and 449,336 controls\nUK Biobank:\n462,341 participants\nGenetically determined insomnia significantly associated\nwith increased migraine risk\nMigraine liability not associated with insomnia risk\nUK Biobank:\n≥ 237,627 participants\nDifficulty awakening and liability to insomnia symptoms associated with increased risk of migraine\nMigraine liability slightly associated with increased napping frequency\nUK Biobank:\n1072 cases and 360,122 controls\nCHARGE Consortium Hemostasis Working Group:\nn  = 2583 to  n  = 120,246\nIncreased FVIII, vWF, and phosphorylated fibrinopeptide\nA and decreased fibrinogen associated with increased migraine risk (especially MA)\nMigraine liability not associated with measures of hemostasis\nGWAS 1 (Hautakangas et al.): 48,975 cases and 540,381 controls\nGWAS 2 (Choquet et al.): 28,852 cases and 525,717 controls\nGWAS 3 (FinnGen): 10,536 cases and 208,845 controls\nUK Biobank\n417,580 participants\nGenetically determined increase in circulating vitamin D levels associated with a decreased migraine risk\nMigraine not associated with vitamin D levels\nGWAS 1 (FinnGen): 10,536 cases and 208,845 controls\nGWAS 2 (Choquet et al.): 28,852 cases and 554,569 controls\nUK Biobank\n363,228 participants\nGenetically determined increase in IGF1 levels associated with decreased risk of migraine\nMigraine not associated with IGF1 levels\nAvon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children:\n6113 participants\nNineteen social and socioeconomic\noutcomes\nUK Biobank:\n10,603 cases, 326,394 controls\n\nA 2018 British GWAS studied 74,461 individuals who had had a headache interfering with daily activities in the previous month and 149,312 controls [ 170 ]. The majority of patients probably had tension headache and less often migraine. This study identified 28 headache susceptibility loci of which 14 had already been identified by GWAS in migraine, and 14 were new. The majority of the potential headache genes were neuronal and not vascular. This study also found a shared genetic background between the headache phenotype and many psychological traits associated with vulnerability to depression and negative emotions, highlighting the importance of links between psychiatric conditions and painful conditions.\nAnother recent GWAS including 2084 Taiwanese patients and 11,822 age- and sex-matched controls identified two loci, rs10493859 in  TGFBR3  and rs13312779 in  FGF23 , both functionally relevant to vascular function and migraine, to be significantly associated with self-reported headache [ 171 ].\nUntil recently, studies on genetics of Cluster headache (CH) have been dominated by candidate gene studies with conflicting findings [ 172 ,  173 ]. A first Italian GWAS on 99 patients and 360 controls identified  ADCYAP1R1  and  MME  gene variants as possibly associated with susceptibility for CH [ 174 ]. These findings were not replicated in a larger Swedish cohort [ 175 ]. In 2021, two GWAS out of which one included Dutch cases ( n  = 840) and controls ( n  = 1457) and Norwegian cases ( n  = 144) and controls ( n  = 1800) [ 176 ], and the second one UK cases ( n  = 852) and controls ( n  = 5614) and Swedish cases ( n  = 591) and controls ( n  = 1134) [ 177 ] independently identified four risk loci for CH on chromosome 1, chromosome 2 (two loci), and chromosome 6, respectively. Subsequently, a meta-analysis of both studies analyzing 8,039,373 variants confirmed a significant association of all 8 index variants (in the 4 loci) and identified three additional loci with genome-wide significance on chromosomes 7, 10 and 19. The nearest genes to the loci on chromosome 2 and 6 are  MERTK  and  UFL1/FHL5 , respectively. Interestingly, as stated in Table  3 ,  UFL1/FHL5  has previously been identified as a migraine risk locus [ 120 ].\nChronic migraine is the most disabling form of migraine, and causes for migraine chronification remain incompletely understood. In order to identify genetic variants contributing to migraine chronification, a comparison of patients with chronic migraine and patients with episodic migraine is necessary, whereas most studies attempting to find genetic risk factors have compared chronic migraineurs to healthy controls. Recent studies comparing chronic and episodic migraine have found genetic variants in the  TRPM8  gene [ 178 ], the  TRPV1  gene [ 179 ], and HLA class I alleles [ 180 ] to be associated with chronic migraine.\nPrevious to these studies, a candidate gene-association study examined 144 SNPs from 48 candidate genes in patients with chronic or high-frequency episodic migraine compared to healthy controls, and did not reveal any significant findings [ 181 ].\nThe first study assessing whole-genome sequencing data in patients with chronic compared to episodic migraine did not show any significant difference [ 182 ].\nFurther studies are needed to determine the proportion of genetic and environmental factors in chronic migraine.\nGenetic factors strongly influence the absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion of drugs. Studies addressing genetic factors underlying treatment response to triptans have described  GNB3 C825T  gene polymorphism to be associated with a better response to triptans in CH patients, and polymorphisms in the  PRDM16, SLC6A4  and  DRD2  genes to be associated with a better, inconsistent and worse response to triptans in migraine patients, respectively [ 183 ]. Another study showed that a polygenic risk score doubling the risk of migraine was associated with a better response to triptans [ 184 ].\nRecently, whole-exome sequencing in a discovery cohort of migraine patients treated by verapamil (definitive responders  n  = 21 and definitive non-responders n = 14), followed by genotyping in a confirmation cohort ( n  = 185), identified 13 SNP, which were highly correlated with the changes in the number of migraine days [ 137 ].\nIn the future, determining the genetic profile of an individual could allow the choice of treatments with the best profile of efficacy and tolerance [ 5 ].\nMitochondrial dysfunction has been suspected to contribute to migraine pathophysiology, since migraine-like headache is a clinical feature of several mitochondrial diseases [ 185 – 187 ], presumable mitochondrial biomarkers have been found to be elevated in migraine patients [ 188 ], and several studies have reported mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) candidate variants possibly associated with migraine [ 189 ,  190 ]. However, the first GWAS assessing 775 mitochondrial DNA variants in 4021 migraine sufferers and 14,288 controls found no migraine-associated variants, ruling out the mitochondrial hypothesis suggested by older studies [ 191 ]. Limitations discussed by the authors were the diagnosis of migraine based on a questionnaire covering symptoms during the past 12 months instead of a clinical interview, and the absence of consideration of heteroplasmic variation, copy-number variations and epigenetic changes.\n\nGenetics of migraine have made significant progress over the past 15 years [ 5 ,  28 ,  114 ]. The study of monogenic migraines identified key proteins of the susceptibility to CSD and helped to better appreciate the links between migraine and vascular disorders. GWAS have identified multiple susceptibility genes revealing several complex networks of “pro-migraine” molecular abnormalities, mainly neuronal and vascular (Fig.  1 ). Genetics has also underscored the importance of genetic factors shared between migraine and its major co-morbidities including depression and high blood pressure. Very large-scale studies are still needed to map all of the susceptibility loci to migraine and then to understand how these genomic variants lead to migraine cell phenotypes. Ultimately, the main pathophysiological mechanism in a given patient, neuronal or vascular or otherwise, could be determined through its genetic risk profile. Pharmacogenetics could help predict the therapeutic response and thus help prescribe the treatment with the best safety and efficacy profile.","source_license":"CC-BY-4.0","license_restricted":false}