{"paper_id":"5b8fdfaf-54f3-4a0f-9cfd-f76e22c3875d","body_text":"The IL-1 system includes an interesting array of at least 21 distinct molecules encompassing receptors, co-receptors, ligands, and endogenous antagonists ( Dinarello, 2009 ). IL-1α and IL-1β (collectively referred to as IL-1) serve as soluble and principally extracellular activators of the IL-1 system, whereas IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1RA) is a competitive inhibitor that prevents IL-1α and IL-1β from interacting with the IL-1 receptor 1 (IL-1R1). IL-1R1, in turn, associates with IL-1 receptor accessory protein (IL-1RAP) to create a transmembrane signaling complex that initiates IL-1-dependent intracellular signaling ( Korherr et al., 1997 ). Somewhat unique to the IL-1 system is the existence of two distinct types of IL-1Rs, namely IL-1R1 and the type 2 IL-1 receptor (IL-1R2). IL-1R1, as noted above, is responsible for IL-1 signal transduction. IL-1R2 serves as an endogenous inhibitor of IL-1 signaling ( Fig. 1 ). IL-1R2 was first characterized by  McMahon et al. in 1991  ( McMahan et al., 1991 ) and is considered the prototypical decoy receptor. More recently, analogous decoy receptors have been identified for IL-18 and TNF ( Mantovani et al., 2001 ). The purpose of these non-signaling receptors is still somewhat unclear, but functionally, they serve as important negative regulators.\nThe IL-1 pathway regulates inflammation, angiogenesis, hematopoiesis and cognition ( Rachal Pugh et al., 2001 ,  Shieh et al., 1991 ). As the first interleukin to be characterized, IL-1 was initially termed endogenous pyrogen for its ability to produce fever in animals and humans. Subsequent work demonstrated the importance of IL-1 to a variety of sickness behaviors, including anorexia, lethargy, locomotion and social exploration ( Dantzer, 2001 ). Confirming the mechanistic importance of IL-1 to sickness were experiments demonstrating that IL-1 antagonism mitigates LPS-dependent reductions in social exploration and food-motivated behavior in mice ( Laye et al., 2000 ,  Bluthe et al., 1992 ,  Kent et al., 1992 ). Overall, much of what is known about IL-1 bioaction is derived from work using IL-1 and IL-1R1 knock out (KO) mice or administered IL-1RA. Given the near absence of IL-1R2 mouse models and IL-1R2 recombinant/synthetic molecules/analogues, the functional role of IL-1R2 is often extrapolated from work with IL-1RA. IL-1R2, however, is quite unique and is likely much more than a redundancy within the system of endogenous IL-1 antagonists.\n\nIn humans, the IL-1R2 gene (IL1R2) is located on the long arm of chromosome 2 at band 2q12. In mice, IL1R2 is found in the centromere proximal position of chromosome 1 ( Copeland et al., 1991 ). In both humans and mice, the genes for IL-1R2 and IL-1R1 are adjacent ( Dale and Nicklin, 1999 ,  Sims et al., 1995 ) with the IL-1R2 and IL-1R1 demonstrating similar transmembrane regions but only a 28% homology in their extracellular domains. The IL-1R2 cDNA and amino acid sequences are similar across species. Examination of bovine IL-1R2 cDNA yielded a sequence homology of 79%, 69% and 69% when compared to human, mouse and rat, respectively ( Yu et al., 1997 ). The amino acid sequence of bovine IL-1R2 is 71% identical with human, 58% identical with mouse and 59% identical with rat.\n\nIL-1R2 mRNA,  in vivo , is up-regulated following middle cerebral artery occlusion, ( Wang et al., 2000 ), acute hypoxia ( Johnson et al., 2007 ) and LPS administration ( Herman et al., 2010 ,  Gabellec et al., 1996 ).  In vitro,  AtT-20 cells treated with IL-1β or TNF-α can increase the number of IL-1R2 gene transcripts within 3 hrs ( Bristulf and Bartfai, 1995 ). Depending on the stimulus, time of peak expression of IL-1R2 mRNA varies from 2 h following acute hypoxia ( Johnson et al., 2007 ) or LPS administration ( Herman et al., 2010 ) to 12 h post cerebral artery occlusion ( Wang et al., 2000 ). The half-life of IL-1R2 transcripts is 110 min in primary murine dendritic cells treated with LPS ( Zeisel et al., 2011 ). Given the rapidity of IL-1R2 mRNA up-regulation and its relatively short half-life, IL-1R2 appears to be an early response gene. Support for this contention is in the identification of an NF-κB binding site within the IL-1R2 promoter region ( Yan et al., 2008 ).\n\nIL-1R2, in humans and non-human primates, is a protein comprised of 398 amino acids. In mice and rats, it is slightly longer at 410 and 416 amino acids, respectively. As a decoy receptor, IL-1R2 cannot signal. This is due to its lack of an intracellular TIR domain, a conserved region shared by IL-1R1 and the Toll-like receptors (TLRs) as part of the IL-1/TLR superfamily ( Dunne and O’Neill, 2003 ,  Xu et al., 2000 ). Interestingly, Heguy et al. constructed a functional receptor by combining the extracellular and transmembrane domains of IL-1R2 with the intra-cytoplasmic domain of IL-1R1 ( Heguy et al., 1993 ). With three immunoglobulin-like extracellular domains and a single helical transmembrane domain, IL-1R2 is structurally similar to IL-1R1. IL-1R2, however, lacks approximately 200 cytoplasmic amino acids critical to the TIR ( Slack et al., 2000 ). Thus, with only a 29 amino acid cytoplasmic region, IL-1R2 is a 68 kDa glycoprotein in comparison to IL-1R1 which is 80 kDa ( Sims et al., 1988 ).\nThe affinity of IL-1R2 for IL-1β is 10 −10  M, while its affinity for IL-1α is 100 times less at 10 −8  M. IL-1R1 binds IL-1α at 10 −10  M, but binds IL-1β at 10 −9  M ( McMahan et al., 1991 ). In addition, the affinity of IL-1R1 for IL-1RA is similar to its affinity for IL-1α and IL-1β ( Symons et al., 1995 ). In contrast, IL-1R2 binds IL-1RA approximately 100 times less effectively than IL-1R1 ( McMahan et al., 1991 ). These differences in affinity suggest that IL-1R2 and IL-1RA may have different biologic roles.\nThe IL-1R2 receptor exists in both membrane bound and soluble forms (sIL-1R2). Generation of sIL-1R2 appears to occur via two mechanisms. First, alternative splicing has been shown to generate sIL-1R2 in patients with autoimmune inner ear disease (AIED) ( Vambutas et al., 2009 ). How alternatively spliced sIL-1R2 is secreted is currently not known. Second, matrix metalloproteinases can cleave full-length membrane bound IL-1R2, shedding the extracellular domain as a 45–47 kDa sIL-1R2 ( Orlando et al., 1997 ). This IL-1R2 ectodomain liberation appears to require aminopeptidase regulator of TNFR1 shedding (ARTS-1) ( Cui et al., 2003 ). Interestingly, IL-1R2 shedding can occur slowly (hrs) in response to IL-4, IL-13 and glucocorticoids ( Colotta et al., 1996 ,  Colotta et al., 1994 ) and rapidly (mins) in response to N-formyl-methionine-leucine-phenylalanine, LPS, TNF, reactive oxygen species and phorbol esters ( Penton-Rol et al., 1999 ,  Orlando et al., 1997 ,  Sambo et al., 1996 ,  Colotta et al., 1995 ).\nLike IL-1R2, sIL-1R2 binds circulating IL-1. The IL-1β/sIL-1R2 dissociation rate is very low, and from a physiological perspective, the IL-1β/sIL-1R2 interaction has been deemed essentially irreversible ( Arend et al., 1994 ). This makes it unlikely that sIL-1R2 acts as an IL-1 carrier or a protein that protects IL-1 from degradation. Interestingly, sIL-1R2 can sequester pro-IL-1β, interfering with the ability of caspase-1 to enzymatically generate mature IL-1β from its pro-form ( Symons et al., 1995 ).\n\nIL-1R2 is natively found on neutrophils, B-cells, monocytes and macrophages ( Colotta et al., 1996 ,  McMahan et al., 1991 ). It can also be induced in keratinocytes and endothelial cells ( Lukiw et al., 1999 ,  Groves et al., 1995 ,  McMahan et al., 1991 ). Monocytes at rest possess 1.3 × 10 3  receptors/cell and after 24 hrs of IL-13 treatment express 3.5 × 10 3  receptors/cell. In comparison, 12.0 × 10 3  sIL-1Rs/cell were elaborated into the media in the same time period ( Colotta et al., 1996 ). IL-1R1 is expressed by almost all cell types, at least at low levels ( Dower et al., 1985 ). This suggests that IL-1R2 protects specific cell types from IL-1. sIL-1R2, on the other hand, is ubiquitously present in the plasma of healthy individuals ( Giri et al., 1994 ) at a relatively high concentration when compared to serum IL-1β and IL-1RA. In healthy women, serum concentrations of sIL-1R2 are nearly two-fold higher than IL-1RA (570.5 ± 79.1 pg/mL vs 11,328.9 ± 384.9 pg/mL) ( Chun et al., 2012 ) while serum IL-1β is essentially undetectable in healthy human subjects (0.3 ± 0.5 pg/mL) ( Hasdai et al., 1996 ). It remains unclear why the basal expression of IL-1R2 exceeds that of basal IL-1. It is also unknown if any or all of the IL-1R2s are occupied by IL-1 in the healthy state.\n\nMonoclonal antibody blocking studies show that when IL-1 is prevented from interacting with IL-1R2, IL-1 bioaction in neutrophils, lymphocytes and monocytes is not inhibited ( Sims et al., 1993 ,  Colotta et al., 1993 ). Blocking the IL-1/IL-1R1 interaction in neutrophils and monocytes does prevent IL-1-induced production of IL-6, IL-8 and TNF-α ( Sims et al., 1993 ). As recently reviewed by Weber et al, the initial step in IL-1 signaling is IL-1 binding to IL-1R1 with subsequent IL-1R1 heterodimerization with IL-1RAP ( Greenfeder et al., 1995 ). The IL-1R1/IL-1RAP complex then scaffolds a functional signaling complex comprised of myeloid differentiation factor 88 (MyD88), IL-1 receptor-associated kinases (IRAK) and TNF-receptor associated factor 6 (TRAF-6) resulting in the activation of the NF-κB and mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK) ( Weber et al., 2010 ). IL-1R2 serves as a negative regulator of IL-1 signaling by competing with IL-1R1 for IL-1 and by complexing with IL-1RAP once it binds IL-1, thereby sequestering both the ligand and the accessory protein required for signal transduction ( Malinowsky et al., 1998 ,  Lang et al., 1998 ). Additionally, sIL-1R2 can bind IL-1 and bind soluble IL-1RAP (sIL-1RAP) ( Smith et al., 2003 ), which is a product of IL-1RAP alternative splicing ( Jensen et al., 2000 ). The interaction of sIL-1R2 with sIL-1RAP increases the affinity of sIL-1R2 for IL-1 by over 100-fold without impacting affinity for IL-1RA. Current evidence, however, does not support an interaction between IL-1, sIL-1R2 and full-length IL-1RAP ( Smith et al., 2003 ).\n\nIL-1-mediated inflammation contributes to the pathology of many diseases including rheumatoid arthritis, adult-onset Still’s disease, type 2 diabetes, gout, systolic heart failure and pustular psoriasis ( Dinarello et al., 2012 ). Therefore, inhibition of IL-1 signaling is considered a major therapeutic target. Experimentally, transfection or overexpression of IL-1R2 has been used to create anti-inflammatory profiles in animal models of collagen induced arthritis ( Bessis et al., 2000 ), IL-1-induced inflammation ( Rauschmayr et al., 1997 ) and cardiac allograft surgery ( Simeoni et al., 2007 ).  In vitro , the expression IL-1R2 has been suppressed by pro-inflammatory agents like LPS ( Penton-Rol et al., 1999 ) and interferon-γ (INF-γ) ( Chang et al., 2009 ). Increased IL-1R2 expression has been induced by immunosuppressive and anti-inflammatory agents such as dexamethasone ( Re et al., 1994 ), prostaglandins ( Spriggs et al., 1992 ), glucocorticoids, IL-4 ( Colotta et al., 1993 ), IL-13 ( Colotta et al., 1994 ), IL-27 ( Kalliolias et al., 2010 ) and aspirin ( Daun et al., 1999 ). In transgenic mice over-expressing IL-1R2 in the epidermis, phorbol ester-induced epidermal and dermal inflammation is blunted. Engineered to over-express IL-1R2 on keratinocytes, these mice are protected from IL-1-induced acute cutaneous vascular leakage. Interestingly, the anti-IL-1 effect observed was predominantly local, and induced IL-1R2 over-expression did not inhibit immune responses when mice were challenged systemically with IL-1 ( Rauschmayr et al., 1997 ).\nGiven that glucocorticoids increase the expression of IL-1R2 and sIL-1R2, the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis may be critical to their up-regulation. In mice, LPS administration is associated with increased circulating levels of corticosterone and adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH). Similarly, intravenous injection of IL-1β induces hypothalamic production of corticotropin releasing factor (CRF) and ACTH ( Rivier, 1994 ). In contrast, administration of anti-IL-1 antibodies decreases endotoxin-mediated ACTH production ( Rivier et al, 1989 ). Recently, Ohmori et al. found that psychologically stressed PhD students had increased gene expression of IL-1R2 in blood cells ( Ohmori et al, 2005 ), indicating a link between the HPA axis and IL-1R2. Although the direct effect of the HPA axis on IL-1R2 and vice versa is not known, it is reasonable to hypothesize that IL-1R2 expression is triggered by the HPA axis resulting in a diminution of IL-1 signaling in the brain.\nFinally, evidence for the importance of IL-1 in human disease pathogenesis is provided by the use of recombinant IL-1RA (anakinra) in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis ( Dinarello, 2011 ,  Dinarello, 2009 ).  Table 1  highlights the role of IL-1R2 in specific diseases and conditions where its function is best elucidated.\nIL-1 is implicated in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Interestingly, increased concentrations of sIL-1R2 are found in the synovial fluid ( Arend et al., 1994 ) and plasma of individuals with RA ( Jouvenne et al., 1998 ). Levels of sIL-1R2 negatively correlate with severity of disease, implicating sIL-1R2 as a natural antagonist of IL-1-driven joint destruction. In contrast, plasma levels of IL-1RA correlate positively with disease progression, suggesting that IL-1RA is a marker of acute inflammation tied to episodic disease exacerbation ( Jouvenne et al., 1998 ). Due to the ability of IL-1R2 to block IL-1 driven joint destruction, IL-1R2 may be a better therapeutic for RA than IL-1RA. Advantages of IL-1R2 over IL-1RA as a therapeutic is its longer half-life (reduced treatment intervals) and its ability to sequester IL-1RAP and sIL-1RAP.  What is not yet clear is the volume of distribution of IL-1R2 in comparison to IL-1RA . However, given its size and avidity for IL-1RAP, it may have use as a joint space injectable, which would reduce complications associated with systemic anti-IL-1 therapy.\nSupport for IL-1R2 as an anti-arthritic is seen in animal models. In the mouse collage-induced arthritis (CIA) model, recombinant IL-1R2 delivered via implanted human keratinocytes engineered to overexpress human sIL-1R2 (hsIL-1R2) reduced joint concentrations of IL-6 and myeloperoxidase, and also mitigated the histologic and clinical presentation of arthritis ( Bessis et al., 2000 ). In a rabbit model of RA, intravenous administration of sIL-1R2 substantially reduced joint swelling and erosion ( Dawson et al., 1999 ).\nEndometriosis is a pathologic process in which endometrial epithelium manifests outside the internal uterine environment ( Gazvani and Templeton, 2002 ). Peritoneal fluid from women with endometriosis demonstrates elevated levels of IL-1, and it is thought that IL-1-mediated inflammation is a key component in the manifestation and/or progression of endometriosis ( Kondera-Anasz et al., 2005 ,  Taketani et al., 1992 ). Early stage endometriosis is associated with lower concentrations of serum sIL-1R2 ( Kharfi and Akoum, 2002 ) with values averaging 10,008.3 ± 273.5 pg/mL versus 11,328.9 ± 384.9 pg/mL for healthy fertile women ( Chun et al., 2012 ). In addition, extra-uterine endometrial tissue has reduced IL-1R2 ( Akoum et al., 2001 ) and sIL-1R2 protein expression when compared to its intra-uterine counterpart ( Akoum et al., 2007 ). Interestingly, menstruation is a robust localized inflammatory process characterized by tissue necrosis and acute inflammation. While evidence of behavioral change related to neuroimmune activation is suggested by some menstruation-associated sickness-like symptoms, frank sickness behavior is remarkably absent given the pronounced neutrophilic infiltrates. Therefore, containment of the inflammatory response and communication of its presence to the brain must be highly regulated. Whether or not IL-1R2 is essential to this process is unknown. However, given the significant symptomology of endometriosis (especially pain) in comparison to menstruation, it is likely that locally generated IL-1R2 is important to preventing IL-1-associated sickness symptoms from manifesting.\nIn endometriosis, IL-1β appears to drive vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and monocyte chemotactic protein 1 (MCP1) secretion. Transfection of cultured endometriotic cells to enhance IL-1R2 generation reduces VEGF and MCP1 production by these cells ( Akoum et al., 2007 ). Further evidence that IL-1R2 can dampen the progression of endometriosis is seen in nude mice implanted with human endometrial tissue. In these studies, hsIL1-R2 administered intraperitonially curtailed number, volume and dissemination of endometrial implants, as well as suppressed expression of various adhesion, angiogenesis, tissue remodeling and cell survival factors ( Khoufache et al., 2012 ). It is not known whether pain and/or sickness behaviors associated with endometriosis are impacted by exogenously administered IL-1R2.\nBecause IL-1 is a central mediator of myocardial reperfusion injury and a key contributor to immune responses leading to acute graft rejection, neutralizing IL-1 via endogenous IL-1 antagonists may be prudent. Gene therapy to specifically up-regulate IL-1R2 reduced allograft rejection and prolonged graft survival in a rat model of heart transplantation ( Simeoni et al., 2007 ). In these studies, donor heart was transfected with an adenoviral driven vector, AdIL-1R2-Ig, constructed to increase expression of sIL-1R2 immediately prior to transplantation. Transfected hearts had a reduction in infiltrating macrophages and CD4+ T cells as well as fewer TNF-α and TGF-β gene transcripts ( Simeoni et al., 2007 ). As seen in RA and endometriosis, localized expression and/or delivery of IL-1R2 may be especially beneficial.\nIndividuals critically ill with sepsis or operative trauma have significant elevations in IL-1RA and sIL-1R2. Increased sIL-1R2 in such cases is mainly associated with more dire inflammation ( Pruitt et al., 1995 ). For example, acute meningococcal infections raise plasma IL-1RA and sIL-1R2, but the highest sIL-1R2 concentrations are found in those with endotoxemia, complement-activation and shock. In contrast to the serum concentration of IL-1RA, which rapidly wanes during recovery, sIL-1R2 continues to increase ( van Deuren et al., 1997 ). A confounding factor is that administration of dexamethasone to patients with bacterial meningitis (so as to reduce neuroinflammation and cerebral edema) ( Hoffman and Weber, 2009 ), may also induce production of IL-1R2 ( Vambutas et al., 2009 ). Direct relevance of IL-1R2 to sickness has been demonstrated in animals, but to a very limited extent. In IL-1 treated mice, blockade of brain IL-1R2 with a neutralizing antibody increases IL-1-induced sickness behavior ( Cremona et al., 1998 ). In these studies, mice administered i.c.v IL-1β+ i.c.v anti-IL-1R2 antibody ate significantly less than mice receiving i.c.v. IL-1β+ IgG ( Cremona et al., 1998 ). Unfortunately, this is a rare example of how IL-1R2 impacts the brain and behavior.\nType 2 diabetes (T2D) is a disease driven by inflammation ( Donath and Shoelson, 2011 ). In a leptin resistant mouse model of T2D ( db/db  mice) ( Chen et al., 1996 ),  db/db  mice have impaired up-regulation of IL-1RA and IL-1R2 in response to both LPS and IL-1β. These mice also display prolonged LPS- and IL-1β-induced sickness behaviors ( O’Connor et al., 2005 ). In response to acute hypoxia,  db/db  mice are delayed in recovery, and this delay is coupled to a failure of  db/db  mice to up-regulate the endogenous inhibitors of IL-1β ( Johnson et al., 2007 ). For IL-1RA, this is likely due to the importance of leptin in driving IL-1RA gene expression ( Maedler et al., 2004 ). Why IL-1R2 gene expression is impacted in the  db/db  mouse remains unclear, but it could be due to the role of leptin in fostering M2 macrophage activation ( Kredel et al., 2012 ), due to M2 macrophages being a key source of IL-1R2 ( Mantovani et al., 2009 ). As would be predicted, high-fat diet (HFD) fed mice have dysregulated expression of IL-1R2. In this model of diabesity, IL-1R2 gene transcripts are reduced in the brain. Interestingly, fasting increased IL-1R2 gene transcripts in the hypothalamus of lean mice, but not in the hypothalamus of HFD-fed mice ( Lavin et al., 2011 ). These findings support leptin as a regulator of IL-1R2 gene transcripts and suggest that diabesity-associated leptin resistance may impair its expression. Due to its presence in the hypothalamus, IL-1R2 may also be important to appetite regulation.\nIL-1 induced inflammation appears to contribute to the atherosclerotic process by increasing leukocyte adhesion and transmigration and enhancing foam cell and fatty streak formation ( von der Thusen et al., 2003 ,  Elhage et al., 1998 ). Interestingly, macrophages from hyperlipidemic patients have decreased IL-1R2 mRNA and protein expression, as does a macrophage cell line treated  in vitro  with lipoproteins. Taken together, these findings indicate that IL-1-dependent inflammation is relatively unchecked during atheroma formation ( Pou et al., 2011 ). Currently, no research has examined if exogenous IL-1R2 can mitigate atherosclerosis, but Tedui et al. has shown that administration of IL-1RA to ApoE KO mice decreases lesion size ( Tedui et al., 2010 ).\nAIED is hypothesized to be a systemic autoimmune disease where unique sequestered cochlear antigens cause abnormal responses in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PCMCs) ( Vambutas et al., 2009 ). In terms of IL-1R2, autologous perilymph from individuals with AIED does not evoke expression of membrane associated IL-1R2 when incubated with the same individuals peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). sIL-1R2 up-regulation, however, is seen. Glucocorticoid-responsive IL-1R2 is variably impacted by AIED. Therefore, IL-1R2 protein expression in PBMCs from patients with AIED may be able to predict whether an individual will be responsive to steroid therapy ( Vambutas et al., 2009 ).\nElevated levels of sIL-1R2 are found in the cerebrospinal fluid of individuals with Alzheimer’s disease ( Garlind et al., 1999 ). Since Alzheimer’s disease is characterized by chronic glial inflammation ( Tuppo and Arias, 2005 ), increased sIL-1R2 may be a marker of disease progression. Whether dementing illness-associated increases in expression of endogenous antagonists to IL-1 represent compensatory anti-inflammation or have a causative role in memory loss, is not currently known. Given the sensitivity of memory to changes in IL-1/IL-1RA balance, it would not be surprising if increased CNS IL-1R2 in Alzheimer’s disease was not only a response to neurodegeneration, but also a negative affecter of memory.\nA genome-wide candidate gene study suggested a causative role for IL-1R2 in the pathogenesis of ulcerative colitis ( Anderson et al., 2011 ). How this supports the hypothesis that ulcerative colitis is caused by a dysregulated mucosal immune response against commensal gut flora ( Xavier and Podolsky, 2007 ) needs significant further study.\n\nSince its discovery in 1991 ( McMahan et al., 1991 ), IL-1R2 has been characterized as a decoy receptor responsible for capturing IL-1 and reducing IL-1 bioavailability. Given that it can disrupt IL-1R1/IL-1RAP heterodimerization, and that its soluble form can function like a binding protein, the biology of IL-1R2 is varied and complex. Since sIL-1R2 can interact with sIL-1RAP, it is also possible that sIL-1R2 could foster improved IL-1 bioaction because sIL-1RAP may interfere with the ability of IL-1R1 to heterodimerize with membrane-associated IL-1RAP ( Smith et al., 2003 ). In essence, sIL-1RAP may be a functional homologue of sIL-1R2. Additional work is needed to determine if such competing properties exist and are relevant to the IL-1 system.\nAlthough anakinra is a valuable therapeutic tool, it has a short  in vivo  half-life which necessitates daily injection ( Kaiser et al., 2012 ). Furthermore, anakinra has an affinity for IL-1R1 similar to that of IL-1. Thus, a 100–1,000-fold excess of anakinra relative to IL-1 is recommended for efficient blockade of IL-1 signaling ( Gabay et al., 2010 ). IL-1R2 is an attractive candidate as a therapeutic because of its higher affinity for IL-1β and lower affinity for IL-1RA when compared to IL-1R1. Recently, the soluble IL-1 receptor rilonacept was introduced and is FDA approved for cryopyrin-associated periodic syndromes that include familial cold autoinflammatory syndrome and Muckle-Wells Syndrome (Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc, 2008). With similar decoy properties as sIL-1R2, it is a fusion protein containing the extracellular domains of IL-1R1 and IL-1RAP coupled to the Fc region of human IgG1. This IL-1R1 analogue can bind IL-1β and IL-1α with high affinity and has a higher affinity for IL-1β than IL-1RA ( Dinarello et al., 2012 ,  Stahl et al., 2009 ,  Economides et al., 2003 ). Adding to its therapeutic appeal is it’s once per wk dosing schedule (Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc, 2008).\nFinally, KO animal models have contributed significantly to the understanding of numerous inflammatory bioactives. An IL-1R2 KO mouse has been developed (Taconic, Germantown, NY), but almost no information is available on the phenotype of these mice. Given the potential for significant regional differences in IL-1R2 expression within the whole body and within individual organs, tissue-specific IL-1R2 KO mice are especially important to furthering the understanding of IL-1R2 bioaction.","source_license":"public-domain-us","license_restricted":false}