{"paper_id":"58054e51-8483-4813-9682-2be15ad81343","body_text":"References\nZorbas KA, Economopoulos KP, Vlahos NF (2015) Continuous versus cyclic oral contraceptives for the treatment of endometriosis: a systematic review. Arch Gynecol Obstet 292(1):37–43. doi:10.1007/s00404-015-3641-1\nSeracchioli R, Mabrouk M, Frascà C, Manuzzi L, Montanari G, Keramyda A, Venturoli S (2010) Long-term cyclic and continuous oral contraceptive therapy and endometrioma recurrence: a randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril 93(1):52–56\nSeracchioli R, Mabrouk M, Frascà C, Manuzzi L, Savelli L, Venturoli S (2010) Long-term oral contraceptive pills and postoperative pain management after laparoscopic excision of ovarian endometrioma: a randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril 94(2):464–471\nMuzii L, Maneschi F, Marana R, Porpora MG, Zupi E, Bellati F, Angioli R, Benedetti Panici P (2011) Oral estroprogestins after laparoscopic surgery to excise endometriomas: continuous or cyclic administration? Results of a multicenter randomized study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 18(2):173–178\nConflict of interest\nThe authors declare no conflict of interest.\nAuthor information\nAuthors and Affiliations\nCorresponding author\nAdditional information\nThis comment refers to the article available at doi:10.1007/s00404-015-3641-1 and an author’s reply to this comment is available at doi:10.1007/s00404-015-3780-4.\nRights and permissions\nAbout this article\nCite this article\nMuzii, L., di Tucci, C., Achilli, C. et al. Continuous versus cyclic oral contraceptives for endometriosis: any conclusive evidence?. Arch Gynecol Obstet 292, 477–478 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-015-3776-0\nReceived:\nAccepted:\nPublished:\nIssue date:\nDOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-015-3776-0","source_license":"CC0","license_restricted":false}