{"paper_id":"575fb9c1-c877-4968-819a-78df700e37bf","body_text":"- Office Care of Women\n- Office Care of Women\n- Copyright page\n- Dedication\n- Contents\n- Contributors\n- Preface\n- Section I Health promotion\n- Section II Office interventions\n- Section III Pregnancy\n- Section IV Gynecology\n- Chapter 14 Office care of the pediatric-adolescent gynecologic patient\n- Chapter 15 Amenorrhea\n- Chapter 16 Abnormal uterine bleeding\n- Chapter 17 Office care of sexually transmitted infections\n- Chapter 18 Office management of pelvic pain and dyspareunia\n- Chapter 19 Office management of pelvic masses\n- Chapter 20 Office management of incontinence\n- Chapter 21 Office management of pelvic relaxation\n- Chapter 22 Vulvovaginal disease\n- Chapter 23 Office care of patients with leiomyomata of the uterus\n- Chapter 24 Sexual dysfunction\n- Chapter 25 Office management of endometriosis\n- Section V Reproductive endocrinology and infertility\n- Section VI Nongynecologic conditions\n- Index\n- References\nfrom Section IV - Gynecology\nPublished online by Cambridge University Press: 05 May 2016\nBy\nBook contents\n- Office Care of Women\n- Office Care of Women\n- Copyright page\n- Dedication\n- Contents\n- Contributors\n- Preface\n- Section I Health promotion\n- Section II Office interventions\n- Section III Pregnancy\n- Section IV Gynecology\n- Chapter 14 Office care of the pediatric-adolescent gynecologic patient\n- Chapter 15 Amenorrhea\n- Chapter 16 Abnormal uterine bleeding\n- Chapter 17 Office care of sexually transmitted infections\n- Chapter 18 Office management of pelvic pain and dyspareunia\n- Chapter 19 Office management of pelvic masses\n- Chapter 20 Office management of incontinence\n- Chapter 21 Office management of pelvic relaxation\n- Chapter 22 Vulvovaginal disease\n- Chapter 23 Office care of patients with leiomyomata of the uterus\n- Chapter 24 Sexual dysfunction\n- Chapter 25 Office management of endometriosis\n- Section V Reproductive endocrinology and infertility\n- Section VI Nongynecologic conditions\n- Index\n- References\nA summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.\n- Type\n- Chapter\n- Information\n- Office Care of Women , pp. 198 - 210Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016\nPowers, RD, Guertler, AT. Abdominal pain in the ED: stability and change over 20 years. Am J Emerg Med 1995;13:301–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\nCentre for Maternal and Child Enquiries (CMACE). Saving Mothers’ Lives: reviewing maternal deaths to make motherhood safer: 2006–08. The Eighth Report on Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom. BJOG 2011;118(Suppl. 1):17.Google Scholar\nHarris, RD, Holtzman, SR, Poppe, AM. Clinical outcome in female patients with pelvic pain and normal pelvic US findings. Radiology 2000;216:440–443.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\nReiter, RC, Gambone, JC. Nongynecologic somatic pathology in women with chronic pelvic pain and negative laparoscopy. J Reprod Med 1991;36:253–259.Google ScholarPubMed\nWorkowski, KA, Berman, S; Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines 2010. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). MMWR Recomm Rep 2010 Dec 17;59(RR-12):1–110. Erratum in: MMWR Recomm Rep 2011 Jan 14;60(1):18.Google Scholar\nBongard, F, Landers, DV, Lewis, F. Differential diagnosis of appendicitis and pelvic inflammatory disease: a prospective analysis. American Journal of Surgery 1985;150(1):90–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\nPadilla, LA, Radosevich, DM, Milad, MP. Accuracy of the pelvic examination in detecting adnexal masses. Obstet Gynecol 2000;96(4):593–8.Google ScholarPubMed\nMorino, M, Pellegrino, L, Castagna, E, et al. Acute nonspecific abdominal pain: a randomized, controlled trial comparing early laparoscopy versus clinical observation. Ann Surg 2006;244:881–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\nGaitán, HG, Reveiz, L, Farquhar, C. Laparoscopy for the management of acute lower abdominal pain in women of childbearing age. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011;1: CD007683. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD007683.pub2.Google Scholar\nDecadt, B, Sussman, L, Lewis, MO, et al. Randomized clinical trial of early laparoscopy in the management of acute non-specific abdominal pain. Br J Surg 1999;86:1383–6.Google ScholarPubMed\nDeWitt, J, Reining, A, Allsworth, JE, Peipert, JF. “Tuboovarian Abscesses: Is Size Associated with Duration of Hospitalization & Complications?” Obstetrics and Gynecology International 2010; 2010, Article ID 847041, 5 pages. doi:10.1155/2010/847041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar\nCohen, SB, Wattiez, A, Seidman, DS, et al. Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for detorsion and sparing of twisted ischaemic adnexa. JSLS 2003;7:295–9.Google Scholar\nLatthe, P, Latthe, M, Say, L, et al. WHO systematic review of prevalence of chronic pelvic pain: a neglected reproductive health morbidity. BMC Public Health 2006;6:177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\nAhangari, A. Prevalence of chronic pelvic pain among women: an updated review. Pain Physician 2014;17:E141–7.Google ScholarPubMed\nLatthe, P, Mignini, L, Gray, R, et al. Factors predisposing women to chronic pelvic pain: systematic review. BMJ 2006 Apr 1;332(7544):749–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\nMathias, SD, Kupperman, M, Liberman, RF, et al. Chronic pelvic pain: prevalence, health-related quality of life, and economic correlates. Obstet Gynecol 1996;87:321–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\nZondervan, KT, Yudkin, PL, Vessey, MP, et al. The community prevalence of chronic pelvic pain in women and associated illness behaviour. Br J Gen Pract 2001;51:541–7.Google ScholarPubMed\nKroenke, K, Spitzer, RL, Williams, JB. The patient health questionnaire-2: validity of a two-items depression screener. Medical Care 2003;41:1284–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar\nJamieson, DJ, Steege, JF. The association of sexual abuse with pelvic pain complaints in a primary care population. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;177:1408–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar\nRaphael, KG, Widom, CS, Lange, G. Childhood victimization and pain in adulthood: a prospective investigation. Pain 2001;92:283–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\nGottlieb, AS. Domestic violence: a clinical guide for women’s health care providers. Obstetrician & Gynaecologist 2012;14:197–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar\nHoward, FM. The role of laparoscopy in the evaluation of chronic pelvic pain: pitfalls with a negative laparoscopy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1996;4:85–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\nNational Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.Ovarian Cancer. The recognition and initial management of ovarian cancer. NICE clinical guideline 122. London: NICE; 2011 [http://guidance.nice.org.uk/CG122/NICEGuidance/pdf/English].Google Scholar\nOkaro, E, Condous, G, Khalid, A, et al. The use of ultrasound-based “soft marker” for the predictions of pelvic pathology in women with chronic pelvic pain – can we reduce the need of laparoscopy. BJOG 2006;113(3):251–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar\nMeneses, LQ, Uribe, S, Tejos, C, et al. Using magnetic resonance phase-contrast velocity mapping for diagnosing pelvic congestion syndrome. Phlebology 2011;26:157–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\nAlbee, RB Jr, Sinervo, K, Fisher, DT. Laparoscopic excision of lesions suggestive of endometriosis or otherwise atypical in appearance: relationship between visual findings and final histologic diagnosis. J Minim invasive Gynaecol 2008;15:32–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\nMarana, R, Paielli, FV, Muzii, L, et al. [The role of laparoscopy in the evaluation of chronic pelvic pain.] Minerva Ginecol 1993;45:281–6.Google ScholarPubMed\nKresch, AJ, Seifer, DB, Sachs, LB, Barrese, I. Laparoscopy in 100 women with chronic pelvic pain. Obstet Gynecol 1984;64:672–4.Google ScholarPubMed\nDunselman, GA, Vermeulen, N, Becker, C, et al. ESHRE guideline: management of women with endometriosis. Hum Reprod 2014 Mar;29(3):400–12. doi:10.1093/humrep/det457.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\nSoysal, ME, Vicdan, K, Soysal, S, Ozer, S. A controlled trial of goserelin and medroxyprogesterone acetate in the treatment of pelvic congestion. Human Reproduction 2001;16(5):931–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\nBrown, J, Pan, A, Hart, RJ. Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues for pain associated with endometriosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010;12:CD008475. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD008475.pub2.Google Scholar\nFarmer, JE, Prentice, A, Breeze, A, et al. Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues for endometriosis: bone mineral density. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003;4:CD001297. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001297.Google Scholar\nBedaiwy, MA, Casper, RF. Treatment with leuprolide acetate and hormonal add-back for up to 10 years in stage IV endometriosis patients with chronic pelvic pain. Fertil Steril 2006;86:220–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\nSator-Katzenschlager, SM, Scharbert, G, Kress, HG, et al. Chronic pelvic pain treated with gabapentin and amitriptilyne. Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift 2005;117(21–22):761–8.Google Scholar\nPeters, AA, van Dorst, E, Jellis, B, et al. A randomized clinical trial to compare two different approaches in women with chronic pelvic pain. Obstet Gynecol 1991;77:740–4.Google ScholarPubMed\nSrivastava, D. Efficacy of sacral neuromodulation in treating chronic pain related to painful bladder syndrome/interstitial cystitis in adults. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2012;28:428–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\nHaugstad, GK, Haugstad, TS, Kirste, UM, et al. Mensendieck somatocognitive therapy as treatment approach to chronic pelvic pain: results of a randomized controlled intervention study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006 May;194(5):1303–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\nFarquhar, CM, Rogers, V, Franks, S, et al. A randomized controlled trial of medroxyprogesterone acetate and psychotherapy for the treatment of pelvic congestion. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1989 Oct;96(10):1153–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\nSwank, DJ, Swank-Bordewijk, SC, Hop, WC, et al. Laparoscopic adhesiolysis in patients with chronic abdominal pain: a blinded randomised controlled multi-centre trial. Lancet 2003;361(9365):1247–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\nElcombe, S, Gath, D, Day, A. The psychological effects of laparoscopy on women with chronic pelvic pain. Psychol Med 1997;27:1041–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\nHillis, SD, Marchbank, PA, Peterson, HB. The effectiveness of hysterectomy for chronic pelvic pain. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1995;86(6):941–5.Google ScholarPubMed\nDaniels, JP, Middleton, L, Xiong, T, et al. Individual patient data meta-analysis of randomised evidence to assess the effectiveness of laparoscopic uterosacral nerve ablation in chronic pelvic pain. Hum Reprod Update. 2010 Nov–Dec;16(6):568–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\nAndrews, J, Yunker, A, Reynolds, WS, et al. Noncyclic Chronic Pelvic Pain Therapies for Women: Comparative Effectiveness [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2012 Jan. (Comparative Effectiveness Reviews, No. 41.) Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK84586. Assessed July 2014.Google ScholarPubMed\nSchultz, WW, van Andel, P, Sabelis, I, Mooyaart, E. Magnetic resonance imaging of male and female genitals during coitus and female sexual arousal. BMJ 1999 Dec 18–25;319(7225):1596–600.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\nFriedrich, EG. Vulvar vestibulitis syndrome. J Reprod Med 1987 Feb; 32(2):110–14.Google ScholarPubMed\nSturdee, DW, Panay, N; International Menopause Society Writing Group. Recommendations for the management of postmenopausal vaginal atrophy. Climacteric 2010 Dec;13(6):509–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\nCui, Y, Zong, HT, Yan, HL, et al. Treating dyspareunia associated with postmenopausal vulvar and vaginal atrophy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Sex Med 2014;11:487–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\nFerreira, JR, Souza, RP. Botulinum toxin for vaginismus treatment. Pharmacology 2012;89(5–6):256–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\nSmith, PC. The outcome of treatment for pelvic congestion syndrome. Phlebology 2012 Mar;27(Suppl 1):74–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\nBeard, RW, Kennedy, RG, Gangar, KF, et al. Bilateral oophorectomy and hysterectomy in the treatment of intractable pelvic pain associated with pelvic congestion. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1991;98:988–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\nAccessibility compliance for the HTML of this chapter is currently unknown\nand may be updated in the future.\nTo save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.\nNote you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.\nFind out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.\n- Office management of pelvic pain and dyspareunia\n-\n- Book: Office Care of Women\n- Online publication: 05 May 2016\nTo save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.\n- Office management of pelvic pain and dyspareunia\n-\n- Book: Office Care of Women\n- Online publication: 05 May 2016\nTo save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.\n- Office management of pelvic pain and dyspareunia\n-\n- Book: Office Care of Women\n- Online publication: 05 May 2016","source_license":"CC0","license_restricted":false}