{"paper_id":"51b509c5-695f-424d-8194-48ade483c277","body_text":"The advancement of human civilization has coincided with the usage of plants as herbal remedies to cure a wide range of diseases ( Choudhury et al., 2023 ,  Lone et al., 2023 ). The World Health Organization estimates that, at the end of the 20th century, about 80 % of the world's population received their primary healthcare from traditional medicines, which mainly used plant extracts or their active ingredients ( Tahir et al., 2023 ,  Mir et al., 2022 ). Synthetic medications have greatly improved human health and are essential tools in the battle against a variety of diseases ( Qayoom et al., 2023 ,  Jamal, 2023 ). However, overuse of synthetic medications has been shown in recent years to have harmful consequences on human health ( Krishnan et al., 2023 ,  Sofi et al., 2023 ). Scientists are working to create new medications with fewer adverse effects. Since traditional medical systems are more natural, favourable to the environment, and free of side effects, they are gaining high popularity ( Jan et al. ,  Khan et al., 2021 ). Therefore, people still prefer plant-based natural cures over synthetic pharmaceuticals, even with all of the benefits that modern synthetic medications offer. Because they contain many vital phytoconstituents in distinct plant parts, most medicinal plants are unique in their ability to treat and cure a variety of human health issues ( Anand, Jacobo-Herrera, Altemimi, & Lakhssassi, 2019 ). Medicinal plants include a variety of bioactive compounds with pharmacological effects, including anticancer, antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant properties ( Bourais et al., 2023 ). The primary goal of this work is to provide a complete overview as possible of the scientific contributions supporting the traditional medicine and medical herbalism applications of plants belonging to the genus  Geranium , which have particular biological activities.\nThe  Geranium  genus consists of about 400 species, most of which are distributed in the Northern Hemisphere, primarily in temperate climates ( Graça, Ferreira, & Santos, 2020 ). Some species are distributed in tropical regions but in the montane environment at high altitudes. However, species also grow naturally in Australia, New Guinea, South and North Africa, and islands in the Pacific and Atlantic Oceans. Many species are cultivated from North America to Eurasia ( Graça et al., 2020 ). In warmer climates, a large number of plants are annual, passing through the hottest season as seeds, or if perennial habit, they may have a tuber and disappear in summer. Most native species found in Alpine regions develop slowly. The perennial species, some of which are well over 1 m tall, are typically present in grasslands or at the edges of woods. There are 27  Geranium  species in India, with maximum diversity in tropical, hilly regions, and temperate Himalayas, including the Deccan peninsula, north-eastern, and Western Ghats region. Kashmir Himalaya is home to one endemic species,  G. clarke  Yeo ( Wagh et al., 2015 ). Since ancient times, the species of  Geranium  have been utilized in numerous conventional health systems across the globe, such as Indian Ayurveda, Traditional Chinese medicine, and various indigenous medical practices, by means of herbal formulations, ( Bhat et al., 2022 ,  Graça et al., 2020 ). Accordingly, it has been claimed that many plants in this genus are utilised to cure a variety of illnesses.  G. robertianum  has been used for the treatment of haemorrhage, diarrhoea, mouthwash, wounds, gall stones, and burns ( Renda, Celik, Korkmaz, Karaoglu, & Yayli, 2016 ).  G. ruizii  have been used for the treatment of diabetes, inflammation, and chronic diarrhea ( Ikeda et al., 2014 ). The species of the  Geranium  genus have significant pharmacological activities such as anticancer, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antimicrobial properties ( Bhat et al., 2022 ,  Graça et al., 2020 ).\nSystematic computer searches of large, well-known scientific databases, including “Web of Science” and “Scopus,” yielded relevant information. Periodically, data published as peer-reviewed literature that was sourced from primary sources not included in these databases was also incorporated. Information from primary or secondary sources that did not meet these two criteria was not taken into consideration for this review. To expand the knowledge base on the biological activities of the  Geranium  genus, this review also included species whose bioactivity is documented based on  in-vitro  or  in-vivo  research but were not reported to be employed in traditional medicine or herbalism practise. This review includes works that were released up until the end of 2022. The scientific names of plants were verified using the internet database “The Plant List” ( Hidayat et al., 2023 ). This assisted in locating misspellings and the usage of synonyms for various species. If a species' botanical name was unclear or imprecise, it was eliminated. Very few scientific reports regarding the chemical profiling and pharmacological activities of extracts derived from  Geranium  species. Therefore, we must have up-to-date knowledge of this genus and its ethnomedicinal, phytochemical, and pharmacological uses, which will enable us to design future studies of this genus.\n\nThere are over 840 species in the Geraniaceae family ( Kalwij, 2012 ). The plants of the genus  Geranium  are mainly annual or perennial shrubs or herbs globally distributed, primarily in subtropical and temperate climates ( Fiz et al., 2008 ,  Graça et al., 2020 ). This family’s species are categorized into six genera:  Geranium, Pelargonium, California, Monsonia, Hypseocharis,  and  Erodium . The species are biennial, annual, herbaceous, or perennial, and some plants have woody bases; while some contain tubers. Petiolate leaves with toothed or lobed divisions that have stipules are usually aglandular or glandular-hairy and palmately divided. The lower leaves may be alternate; however, the stem leaves are typically opposite. The  Geranium  flowers are usually purplish, pink, or bluish-pink and are borne as solitary or pairs or in smaller umbels encircled by bracteoles. With five hairy sepals and a mucronate tip, the flowers are radially symmetrical. The size of sepals usually increases as the fruit matures. The nectary is near the base of the five equal petals, which can be clawed and occasionally have notches at the tips. Ten stamens are present in polyandrous flowers, grouped in two whorls, with the outer whorl’s anthers dehiscing before the inner whorl’s. In order to prevent self-pollination, the gynoecium has a style that is divided into 5 stigmas that mature after the dehiscence of anthers. After fertilization, the 5 mericarps each consist of only a single seed ( Graça et al., 2020 ).\n\nThe photochemistry of about 300 temperate species of the  Geranium  genus is now generally well understood ( Mabberley, 1997 ). Hegnauer’s chemistry of dictionary states that a minimum of 55 species have undergone chemical analysis ( Hegnauer, 1966 ). Additionally, extensive research has been done on three familiar species, including  G. robertianum  (commonly known as Herb Robert, a European medicinal plant),  G. macrorrhizum  (an oil-obtaining plant), and  G. thumbergii  (a Japanese medicinal species). The ellagitannin geraniin, which received its name after crystallizing from  Geranium thunbergii , it is the  Geranium  genus's most unique single compound. This secondary metabolite is found in all types of leaves in the  Geranium  species. Secondary metabolites of plants are extracted mainly by Cold maceration and Soxhlet extraction method, as shown in  Fig. 1 . When  G. thunbergii  leaf extracts are taken orally, geraniin (1), in contrast to nearly all other hydrolyzable tannins, does not produce an astringent flavour ( Okuda, Yoshida, & Hatano, 1992 ).  Geranium  species are well recognized for being rabbit-proof, and the high level of leaf tannin is thought to be the cause of this potential .  Germacrone is another naturally occurring compound whose name likely derives from the  Geranium  genus; large quantities of the sesquiterpene compound germacrone were obtained from the  G. macrorrhizum . Geraniol (a monoterpene) (2) is also obtained from the  G. macrorrhizum , derived from geraniol oil obtained from  Pelargonium , a closely related genus of  Geranium. Geranium  oil cannot be considered a feature of  Pelargonium  or  Geranium  because it is found in the oils of hundreds of medicinal plants across nature. There is very little data on germacrone or geraniol extensively found in  Geranium . Most research has focused on the flavonoid components, namely two classes of phenolic tannins ( Bhat et al., 2023 ) . The whole diversity of plant polyphenols found in the aerial and root portions of  Geranium  is described in the current account. The structure of different phytochemical compounds identified from different species of the genus  Geranium  is shown in  Fig. 2 . Fig. 1 Extraction of plant material by cold maceration method using various solvents. The solvent used in extraction usually depends on the active constituent, e.g. alkaloids and glycosides, by using alcohol and water in different proportions. Fig. 2 Structure of different phytochemical compounds (Leaf, floral, and exudate flavonoids; hydrolyzable and condensed tannins) identified from different species of the  Geranium  genus.\nExtraction of plant material by cold maceration method using various solvents. The solvent used in extraction usually depends on the active constituent, e.g. alkaloids and glycosides, by using alcohol and water in different proportions.\nStructure of different phytochemical compounds (Leaf, floral, and exudate flavonoids; hydrolyzable and condensed tannins) identified from different species of the  Geranium  genus.\nG. macrorrhizum  aerial portions produced an essential oil including two familiar monoterpenoids i, e β-citronellol and geraniol (2), in addition to many sesquiterpenes. These include α-elemene, α-curcumene, and germacrone (3), which together account for up to 50 % of the oils (I.  Ognyanov et al., 1958 ). The essential oils of other species of  Geranium  are not well documented.\nLeaf flavonoids are mainly flavonol, and widely recognized querstein (4) is prevalently present. According to ( Bate-Smith, 1972 ), quercetin is usually accomplished by the lesser homologue kaempferol (5) in 93 % of the sample and by the greater homologue myricetin in 13 % of the sample analysis of acid-hydrolyzed leaf tissue from 78 plant species. The geographic distribution of the species is somewhat associated with variation in this fundamental flavonol pattern. Plants from the central Eurasian region have a primitive pattern, which includes myricetin (6) as the predominant compound. In contrast, American and Mediterranean species exhibit an advanced pattern characterized by high kaempferol. Even though it is evident that the above-mentioned three flavonol compounds exist in the glycosidic combination in the  Geranium  genus, there are few studies on the glycosidic pattern among most species.\nAdditionally, a survey on the use of HPLC on  Geranium  leaves was conducted by ( Okuda et al., 1980 ). These researchers have revealed that the 3-galactoside known as hyperin (7) frequently occurs in the genus as quercetin (9), which was observed in ethanolic extracts of 12 out of 15  Geranium  species studied. The concentration of hyperin ranges from 0.03 to 1.6 % dry weight, with an average range of 0.43 %. In  G. thunbergii  (Japanese species), quercetin 3-galactoside (8) appears to be deficient; however, leaves of this plant consist of either combination of kaempferol 3,7-dirhamnoside (9) and kaempferol 3-arabinoside-7-rhamnoside or separately kaempferol 3-rhamnoside (10) ( Harborne & Williams, 2002 ).\nThe flavonol glycosides of the medicinal plant  G. robertianum , have been well studied; six monoglucosides are obtained from aerial parts, which include quercetin 7-glucoside (11), quercetin 3-galactoside (8), kaempferol, quercetin 3-glucoside (12) and quercetin 7-rhamnoside (13). Along with monoglucosides, there are seven 3-diglycosides, and only four out of seven were characterized entirely, including 3-rutinosides and 3-rhamnosylgalactosides of quercetin and kaempferol. Although it is unclear if  G. robertianum  varies in the amount of flavonol glycosides, it should be noted that ( Okuda, Mori, & Hatano, 1980 ) were unable to identify the quercetin 3-galactoside mentioned by ( Kartnig & Bucar-Stachel, 1991 ) in their specific sample.\nFive native Egyptian  Geranium  species have been characterized in diverse ways by four additional flavonol glycosides that have not yet been studied. Kaempferol 3-rutinoside-4′-glucoside (14) is the most distinctive, observed in  G. rotundifolium  and  G. yemense . In  G. dissectum,  quercetin 3-glucuronide (15) is present remarkably ( Saleh, El-karemy, Mansour, & Fayed, 1983 ). In the above-mentioned five Egyptian species, quercetin 3-galactoside is lacking. According to ( Harborne & Williams, 2002 ), the  Geranium  genus also contains other flavonoids, such as glycosylflavones; However, they have not been studied further. They have been observed mainly in the case of  G. phaeum . Compared to five glycosyl flavones: orientin (16), vitexin (17), vicenin (18), and isovitexin (19), flavonol glycosides derived from quercetin are minor components ( Boutard & Lebreton, 1975 ).\nThe majority of  Geranium  species feature attractive blooms that range in colour from purple, blue, and red to white and pink. Those floral colours are primarily due to anthocyanins and flavonol glycosides, but very little investigation has been done on anthocyanins in the genus  Geranium . An extensive investigation has been carried out in bluish-purple flowers in  G. sanguinea  and  G. pratense  and the Johnsons blue, a cultivated hybrid obtained from  G. pratense  and  G. himalayense . The three plants listed above contain the main anthocyanin malvidin 3,5-diglucoside (20) ( Markham, Mitchell, & Boase, 1997 ). Petals of these  Geranium  species contain four other flavonol glycosides in addition to anthocyanin, which include; 3-sophorosides of kaempferol, 3-glucosides, and 3-sophorosides of myricetin. Invitro studies have revealed that 3-sophorosides of kaempferol (21) are the essential co-pigment that imparts a blue colour to the flowers of plants. Moreover, a cell sap pH of between 6.8 and 6.6 is responsible for the distinctive features of floral colour development in  Geranium  species. Although it appears to be a singular property of nature, this is essential to the full-colour intensity seen in these blossoms ( Markham et al., 1997 ).\nTrichomes or glandular hairs are frequently present on the upper leaf surface of  Geranium  species. By gently rinsing leaf surfaces in a solvent like acetone, it is possible to study the chemical components of these trichomes independently of the components found inside leaves. In addition to the hydrocarbons and terpenoids usually found at the surface, the species leaves consist of a combination of lipid-soluble flavonoids, typically flavonol methyl ethers. These phytocompounds have been discovered from the leaves of  G. lucidum  and  G. macrorrhizum . These two species of plants consist of some myricetin, quercetin, or 14 kaempferol methyl ethers. ( Ivancheva & Wollenweber, 1989 ; I. V.  Ognyanov, 1972 ) revealed that the leaf surface of  G. macrorrhizum  consists of kaempferol 3- methyl ether (22) and 3,5,7.2′,4,6′- hexahydroxyflavone (a novel flavonol). The evidence supporting the new flavonol has been reexamined, and it appears that a known flavonol was mistakenly identified.\nThe chemical geraniin, which was initially crystallized from  G. thunbergii  leaf extracts, is the main hydrolyzable tannin of the genus  Geranium . Japan has traditionally utilised this plant for medicinal purposes. Over the years, many people have taken aqueous extracts of  G. thunbergia  as an antidiarrheal to regulate digestive function ( Okuda et al., 1992 ). More than 10 % of the dried leaf's weight is made up of geraniin. Interestingly, geraniin does not possess the typical astringency associated with plant tannins; instead, it crystallizes as yellow substances. Geraniin is a chemical compound derived from a glucose molecule with two hexahydroxygallic acid residues disubstituting the 2,4 and 3,6 positions. Moreover, the sugar's C-1 has a galloyl ester group attached. Gallic acid is converted synthetically into geraniin by employing pentagalloylglucose as a precursor. Since HPLC has found geraniin in each of the 15 species examined, it would seem that geraniin is the distinctive hydrolysable tannin of the genus  Geranium  ( Okuda et al., 1980 ).\nGeraniin and its related molecule, ellagic acid (23), co-occur in the  Geranium  plant leaves. According to ( Bate-Smith, 1962 ), the leaves of four out of the six plants he surveyed,  G. robertianum ,  G. meeboldii ,  G. phaeum,  and  G. sylvatixum  contained ellagic acid. The main sites for producing ellagic acid are rhizomes and roots of the plants, which have been observed in some sixty-one plant species ( Hegnauer, 1966 ). Gallic acid (24), which is thought to be an ellagic acid precursor, has also been consistently seen in the roots ( Hegnauer, 1966 ) and leaves ( Bate-Smith, 1962 ). Gallic acid (phenolic acid) has been identified from the roots of  G. nepalensis ,  G. pratense , and  G. maculatum .\nBoth hydrolyzable and condensed tannins are present in the  Geranium  species, although their distribution in various organs varies greatly. According to ( Bate-Smith, 1972 ), the rootstock is the main site where proanthocyanidin (condensed tannin) is mainly found. Only a few of the sixty  Geranium  species studied had considerable proanthocyanidin content in their leaves. These species are  G. incanum  (South Africa),  G. platypetalum  (Armenia),  G. sinense  (China),  G. lindenianum  (Venezuela),  G. renardii  (Caucasus), and  G. polyanthes  (Eurasia).  Geranium  contains proanthocyanidins based on prodelphinidin, procyanidin, or a combination of the two. However, the two procyanidin precursors, (−)-epicatechin (27) and (+)-catechin (26), have been found in the roots of  G. palustre  and  G. pratense , suggesting that the procyanidins are most likely of a common kind of proanthocyanidins ( Hegnauer, 1966 ). It has been determined that the levels of ellagitannin and procyanidin (25) in fresh rhizomes of  G. sylvaticum  are roughly equal. In contrast,  G. pratense  has just one-seventh of the procyanidin content and six-sevenths of the ellagitannin content ( Hegnauer, 1966 ).  Geranium  species have historically been used as significant sources of tanning material in the leather industry due to the high tannin amount in their roots. This conventional method has been employed with at least two species;  G. wallichianum  and  G. nepalense .\nIn  G. viscosissimum  and  G. richardsonii , tartaric acid is typically accumulated in the aerial portions. In the members of the Geraniaceae family, this organic acid is frequently present; however, this organic acid is not always found in all  Geranium  species ( Stafford, 1961 ). When  G. sanguineum  and  G. robertianum  were analyzed, tartaric acid was absent, but citric and malic acids were present ( Harborne & Williams, 2002 ).\n\nSince ancient times, the species of  Geranium  have been utilized in numerous conventional health systems across the globe, such as Indian Ayurveda, Traditional Chinese medicine, and various indigenous medical practices, by means of herbal formulations ( Williamson, 2002b ). Accordingly, it has been claimed that many plants in this genus are utilised to cure a variety of illnesses, as shown in  Table 1 . Table 1 Ethnomedicinal importance of various species of the  Geranium  genus, including  G. pratense, G. robertianum, G. wallichianum, etc . The species of this genus are mainly found in China and India. Species of the  Geranium  Genus Country name Ethnomedicinal importance References G. pratense Europe, China, and Japan Bacillary dysentery (Acute) ( Williamson, 2002b ) G. robertianum USA, Japan, Europe, North Africa, China, South America, and India Hemorrhage, dispersal of kidney, diarrhoea, mouthwash, wounds, gall stones, and burns. ( Williamson, 2002b ) G. wallichianum India Toothache, headache, otorrhoea, rheumatic pain, diarrhoea, body pain, backache, fever, astringent, ophthalmia, cough and cold, styptic, cough, wounds, dysentery, and jaundice ( Agnihotri et al., 2014 ,  Kumar et al., 2015 ,  Shaheen et al., 2012 ,  Thakur et al., 2016 ) G. aculeolatum Burundi Diarrhoea, ringworm, and purulent rashes ( Ngezahayo, Havyarimana, Hari, Stévigny, & Duez, 2015 ) G. ayavacense Peru Astringent, gingivitis, hypoglycaemic, gastric lesions, ulcerative stomatitis, and gastritis. ( Aranda-Ventura, Villacrés, Mego, & Delgado, 2014 ) G. himalayense India Indigestion ( Agnihotri et al., 2014 ) G. macrorrhizum Poland, Bulgaria, and Romania Dysentery, antiviral, diarrhoea, gastrointestinal ulcers, styptic in haematuria, and menorrhagia ( Williamson, 2002b ) G. lucidum India Astringent and Diuretic ( Agnihotri et al., 2014 ) G. dissectum Lebanon Rheumatic disorders ( Marc, 2008 ) G. maximowiczii China Rheumatic disorders ( Küpeli, Tatli, Akdemir, & Yesilada, 2007 ) G. molle Portugal Cancer, stomach ache, uterus inflammation, gingivitis, antiseptic and eye inflammation ( Neves, Matos, Moutinho, Queiroz, & Gomes, 2009 ) G. nepalense India Astringent, ulcers, jaundice, endometriosis, itching, antibacterial, stomach disorders, renal disorders, fever, wounds, diuretic, toothache, eczema, and diarrhoea ( Agnihotri et al., 2014 ,  Dutt et al., 2015 ,  Singh and Rawat, 2011 ,  Williamson, 2002b ) G. rivulare India Ulcers and Insect bites ( Williamson, 2002b ) G. polyanthes India Headache and ulcers ( Singh & Rawat, 2011 ) G. platyanthum China and Japan Pain, numbness of limbs, and rheumatic disorders ( Williamson, 2002b ) G. pusillum India Wounds, analgesic, and astringent ( Agnihotri et al., 2014 ) G. purpureum Portugal Cancer, hepatic protective, gall-bladder ailments, Antiulcerative, gastritis, intestinal antispasmodic, vulnerary, sea-sickness, analgesic, and gastric protective ( Novais et al., 2004 ,  Singh and Rawat, 2011 ) G. ruizii Peru Diabetes, inflammation, and chronic diarrhea ( Ikeda et al., 2014 ) G. seemannii Central America, Mexico, and the Caribbean Obesity, laxative, and diuretics ( Alonso-Castro, Domínguez, Zapata-Morales, & Carranza-Álvarez, 2015 ) G. sibiricum India Wounds, astringent, and diuretic ( Agnihotri et al., 2014 ) G. niveum Mexico Analgesic, purgative, infectious diarrhoea, gastrointestinal disorders, fever, kidney pain, urological problems, diabetes, skin tumours, dermatological conditions ( Alonso-Castro et al., 2011 ,  Calzada et al., 1998 ) G. phaeum Bulgaria, Serbia Astringent, inflammation of gastric mucous membranes, aphrodisiac ( Chalchat, Petrovic, Maksimovic, & Gorunovic, 2002 ) G. mexicanum Mexico, Venezuela Laxative in infants, antispasmodic, rashes, wounds ( Williamson, 2002a ) G. incanum South Africa Diarrhoea, menstruation ( Amabeoku, 2009 ,  Steenkamp, 2003 ) G. bellum Mexico Fever, pain, gastrointestinal disorders ( Bautista et al., 2015 ) G. carolinianum China Diarrhoea, rheumatic arthritis ( Li et al., 2008 ) G. core-core Chile Cataracts, shock, fever, astringent, toothache, inflammatory conditions ( Rodriguez et al., 1994 ) G. koreanum China Itching, bruising, enteritis, chronic diarrhoea, liver disorders ( Oh et al., 2015 ) G. strictipes China Enteritis, diarrhoea, chronic gastritis ( Zuo et al., 2008 ) G. tuberosum Cyprus Cardiovascular, skin ( González-Tejero et al., 2008 ) G. wilfordii China Chronic rheumatism, gastrointestinal disorders, diarrhoea, dysentery ( Williamson, 2002a ,  Zhang et al., 2013 ) G. sanguineum Eastern Europe Haemorrhage, diarrhoea ( Williamson, 2002a )\nEthnomedicinal importance of various species of the  Geranium  genus, including  G. pratense, G. robertianum, G. wallichianum, etc . The species of this genus are mainly found in China and India.\nIn parallel with the growing fascination with herbal remedies overall, a comprehensive assessment of the characteristics of medicinal plants belonging to the genus  Geranium  has been undertaken, mainly over the previous 20 years. Many studies examining various biological features of a reasonably broad number of species from this genus can currently be found in the specialized literature.\nMany researchers have studied the antibacterial properties of the  Geranium  genus. The general overview of the antimicrobial activity of the  Geranium  genus is shown in  Fig. 3 . The extracts of many species of  Geranium  were tested against various bacterial strains, as shown in  Table 2 . This investigation primarily used aqueous and alcoholic extracts of plants of different geographic origins. The two main screening methods used to evaluate the antibacterial potential were broth microdilution and disc diffusion methods. A broad range of inhibitory action was detected in the extracts of plants, and in most cases, minimum inhibitory concentration (MICs) was reported. The antimicrobial potential of  Geranium  species (essential oils) has been far less studied than that of solid–liquid extracts. Several hydrodistilled essential oils were tested for their ability to inhibit various bacterial strains, including several plant pathogens. Research studies have evaluated the antimicrobial potential of the  Geranium wallichianum  dry extracts (ethanolic, ethyl acetate, methanolic and petroleum ether), as shown in  Table 3  ( Mir et al., 2022 ). Three fungal strains that had their antifungal potential assessed were among the nine microbial strains identified for the investigation, whereas six were bacterial strains such as  N. mucosa, K. pneumoniae, M. luteus, S. pneumonia, E. coli, H. influenzae, C. paropsilosis C. albicans , and  C. glabrata  were chosen. The antimicrobial potential of different  G. wallichianum  extracts (ethanolic, petroleum ether, ethyl acetate, and methanolic) was obtained in this study. The antibacterial efficacy of various  G. wallichianum  extracts has exhibited remarkable antimicrobial potential against diverse microbial isolates. MICs of positive antifungal and antibacterial drugs like amphotericin B and ciprofloxacin, respectively, were determined through the broth dilution method. The MIC of various extracts demonstrated significant antimicrobial properties. The ethyl acetate extracts showed the highest antimicrobial potential compared to the other three extracts. The MIC values of the  G. wallichianum  extract (ethyl acetate) against  H. influenzae, M. luteus, K. pneumoniae, E. coli, N. mucosa and S. pneumoniae  were 6.25, 3.12, 25, 100, 25 and 12.5 μg/mL, respectively .  Compared to various bacterial strains, plant extracts demonstrated less efficient antimicrobial potential against the three fungal strains, such as  C. paropsilosis ,  C. glabrata , and  C. albicans . Fig. 3 The general overview of antimicrobial activity of the  Geranium  genus. Phytocompounds were identified using the LC-MS technique, followed by  in-silco  molecular docking and MD simulation. Table 2 MIC (Minimum inhibitory concentration) values of various  Geranium  species essential oils against different bacterial strains. Various positive controls were taken for the determination of MIC: Ampicillin, Streptomycin, Chloramphenicol and Tetracycline. Geranium  species Part used Bacillus cereus Bacillus cereus Bacillus subtilis Micrococcus flavus Mycobacterium smegmatis Staphylococcus aureus Staphylococcus aureus Streptococcus agalactiae Staphylococcus pseudintermedius Streptococcus canis Staphylococcus aureus Clostridium perfringens Listeria monocytogenes References G. asphodeloide aerial portion – 0.355 – – 0.355 – – – – – 3.50 – – ( Uzun et al., 2004 ) G. columbinum aerial parts – – 14 7 – 1.750 – – – – 6 0.437 – ( Radulovic et al., 2011 ) G. lucidum whole part – – 13.4 13.4 – 3.35 – – – – 0.312 1.675 – ( Radulovic et al., 2011 ) G. macrorrhizum aerial portion – – 0.001 – – 0.039 – – – – 0.625 – – ( Radulović et al., 2010 ) G. psilostemon aerial portion – – – – 4.220 – – – – – – – – ( Renda et al., 2016 ) G. purpureum aerial portion – 4.22 – – 3.365 – – – – – – – – ( Renda et al., 2016 ) G. pyrenaicum aerial portion – 3.365 – – 0.335 0.335 – – – – – – – ( Renda et al., 2016 ) G. robertianum leaves – 0.16 – – – 1.25 5 2.5 2.5 – – – ( Renda et al., 2016 ) G. sanguineum whole plant 5 – – – – 5 – – – 5 – – ( Renda et al., 2016 ) Table 3 In-vitro  antimicrobial potential of different extracts of  Geranium wallichianum  D. Don using Broth dilution method. Positive antimicrobial drugs were also taken. Strains MIC (µg/mL) ETH MT PE EA AMF-B/CIP K. pneumoniae 25 6.25 25 25 0.039 E. coli 50 100 100 100 0.625 N. mucosa 25 25 25 25 03.12 S. pneumoniae 25 25 12.5 12.5 0.625 M. luteus 3.12 6.25 1.56 3.12 1.25 H. influenzae 25 25 25 6.25 1.25 C. glabrata 400 400 400 400 2 0.5 C. Paropsilosis 400 400 400 400 2 0.5 C. albicans 6.25 200 400 400 1.25 Where CIP; Ciprofloxacin (standard antimicrobial drug and AMF-B: Amphotericin-B (standard antifungal drug); PE: petroleum ether, ETH; ethanolic, MT; methanolic, and EA: ethyl acetate.\nThe general overview of antimicrobial activity of the  Geranium  genus. Phytocompounds were identified using the LC-MS technique, followed by  in-silco  molecular docking and MD simulation.\nMIC (Minimum inhibitory concentration) values of various  Geranium  species essential oils against different bacterial strains. Various positive controls were taken for the determination of MIC: Ampicillin, Streptomycin, Chloramphenicol and Tetracycline.\nIn-vitro  antimicrobial potential of different extracts of  Geranium wallichianum  D. Don using Broth dilution method. Positive antimicrobial drugs were also taken.\nWhere CIP; Ciprofloxacin (standard antimicrobial drug and AMF-B: Amphotericin-B (standard antifungal drug); PE: petroleum ether, ETH; ethanolic, MT; methanolic, and EA: ethyl acetate.\nKosuge et al. (1985)  first examined the anticancer potential of the plants of the  Geranium  genus; they carried out this work on  G. nepalense  ( Kosuge et al., 1985 ). In this study, 90 Chinese herbal species were supposed to have anticancer potential; the  G. nepalense  extracts (methanolic and aqueous) were among the few to demonstrate considerable  invitro  cytotoxic effects against HeLa (cervical cancer cells). At a 0.1 mg/mL dosage, both extracts showed more than 75 % growth inhibition.\nKashiwada et al. (1992)  revealed that aqueous acetate (80 %) extract from  G. thunbergii  has an effective cytotoxic effect against RPMI-7951 melanoma cancer cells with an ED 50  value of 20 µg/mL ( Kashiwada, Nonaka, Nishioka, Chang, & Lee, 1992 ). Nearly 900 natural product extracts in comparison to paclitaxel were subjected to high-throughput screening for their ability to suppress the division of MDA-MB-231 cells by having an antimitotic impact.  G. maculatum  (ethanolic extract) exhibits a moderate growth inhibition potential (IG 50  value of 0.06 mg/mL) (; E.  Mazzio, Badisa, Mack, Deiab, & Soliman, 2014 ). According to studies by Mazzio and Soliman, the  G. maculatum  extract (ethanolic) was also found to be cytotoxic to the Neuro 2-a murine neuroblastoma cell line, with an LC 50  value of 1.170 mg/ml (E. A.  Mazzio & Soliman, 2009 ).  Kim (2016)  observed that aqueous ethanolic extract (70 %) of  G. krameri  possesses low cytotoxicity against a B16F10 murine skin cancer cell line (ID 50  value of 469 µg/mL) (H.-S.  Kim, 2016 ).\nDifferent aqueous (infusion and decoction) and organic extracts (ethyl acetate, acetone, n-hexane, and methyl chloride, obtained by successive extraction from  Geranium robertianum  were assessed against various human cancer cell lines, such as cervical (HeLa), non-small cell lung (NCIH460), breast (MCF-7) and hepatocellular (HepG2) hepatocellular (HepG2) carcinomas ( Mir et al., 2023 ; Barros et al. ). All these extracts possessed cytotoxic potential (GI 50  values range of 55.68–236 µg/mL). The acetone extract of  G. robertianum  has the most significant cytotoxic effect with GI 50  values from 57 to 60 µg/mL against various human cancer cell lines. Ellipticine, a potent anti-cancer drug, was utilized as a positive control and showed GI50 ranges between 0.91 and 2.29 µg/mL. The same author conducted a similar investigation on  Geranium molle  against the similar above-mentioned cell lines, which revealed the same findings with the extract of acetone, showing GI 50  values ranging from 50 to 85 µg/mL ( Graça et al., 2016b ).\nSohretoglu et al. examined the cytotoxic potential of various  G. tuberosum  and  G. psilostemon  extracts; often employed against a KB human epidermoid cancer cell line in traditional Turkish medicine ( Şöhretoğlu, Genç, & Harput, 2017 ). Various extracts of these two plants, such as aqueous, 80 % ethyl acetate, methanol, petroleum ether, and butanol, showed a concentration-dependent cytotoxic effect in the range of 10–0.1 µg/mL.  G. tuberosum  and  G. psilostemon  aqueous extracts showed proliferation inhibition of approximately 65 % and 55 %, respectively, when compared to doxorubicin (standard) at a concentration of 10 µg/mL. The butanol and ethyl acetate extracts exhibited less than 30 % anticancer potential at the same concentration.\nHerrera-Calderon et al. (2018)  recently evaluated the cytotoxicity of  G. ruizii  aqueous ethanol extract against different breast cancer cell lines; H-460, MCF-7, HT-29, K-562 (myelogenous leukaemia), M-14 (melanoma) and Du-145 (prostate) (Herrera‑Calderon et al., 2018). The extract DU-145 cell line had strong anticancer potential with an IC 50  value of >15.63 µg/mL. The anticancer potential of positive control standard; 5-fluorouracil is more than plant extracts with IC 50  values ranged from 0.33 to 4.08 µg/mL. The general view of the anticancer potential of plant extracts is shown in  Fig. 4 . Fig. 4 The general view of anticancer activity of plant extracts of the  Geranium  genus. After the extraction of plant material, compounds were identified using TLC, HPLC and NMR techniques. These compounds were subjected to  in-vitro  and  in-vivo  anticancer studies.\nThe general view of anticancer activity of plant extracts of the  Geranium  genus. After the extraction of plant material, compounds were identified using TLC, HPLC and NMR techniques. These compounds were subjected to  in-vitro  and  in-vivo  anticancer studies.\nDifferent  Geranium  species are used internally to treat diarrhoea problems ( Williamson, 2002b ,  Williamson, 2002a ), but many  Geranium  species have yet to be explored. Secretory diarrhea, which develops when water is secreted into the intestinal lumen rather than absorbed, is one of the mechanisms in diarrhea etiology and can quickly result in severe dehydration ( Field, 2003 ). In Sprague-Dawley rats, extracts of  G. mexicanum  (aerial portions) were reported to exhibit antisecretory action ( Velázquez, Calzada, Torres, González, & Ceballos, 2006 ). The aqueous plant extract demonstrated 42.1 per cent inhibition compared to loperamide (43.3 %); it is taken as a standard for the treatment of diarrhoea. However, the methanolic extract exhibits a more significant antisecretory potential of 93.4 % inhibition than positive control loperamide. Both methanolic and aqueous extracts of the roots lack antisecretory potential.\nAmabeoku (2009)  revealed that the aqueous extract ( G. incanum  leaves) had antipropulsive and antidiarrhoeal potential in albino mice with oil-induced diarrhoea, lowering various diarrhoeal episodes and decreasing the faecal output, with a net outcome same as that of loperamide ( Amabeoku, 2009 ). In Wistar rats, diarrhoea induced by castor oil,  G. ocellatum  aqueous leaf extract, showed a remarkable anti-diarrheal activity, significantly lowering the total amount and weight of wet faeces. A maximum of 78.87 % was observed when diarrhoea rats were treated with the plant extract, and 79.52 % inhibition was observed when treated with loperamide ( George & Joseph, 2012 ).\nAcharya et al. (2014)  revealed that the methanolic extract of  G. viscosissimum  (leaves) at a dosage of 50 mg/ml in Dimethyl sulfoxide could prevent invitro egg hatch of  Haemonchus contortus  with EG 50  of 0.63 mg/mL ( Acharya, Hildreth, & Reese, 2014 ).  Haemonchus contortus  is a gastrointestinal nematode parasite that severely reduces livestock production ( Preston et al., 2014 ).  G. incanum  methanolic extract collected after the sequential plant extraction method with methylene chloride, ethyl acetate, and n-hexane was observed to induce approximately 85 per cent larvae paralysis of  Haemonchus contortus  (20 mg/ml) within 24 h of contact ( Olalekan, Robert, & Thozamile, 2015 ).\nKupeli et al. (2007) assessed the anti-inflammatory potential of  G. finitimum  aqueous extracts, which was produced by partitioning a crude methanolic extract between water and chloroform, using three inflammation models; Swiss albino mice, prostaglandin E2, and carrageenan-induced paw oedema and TPA induced ear oedema ( Kupeli, 2007 ). Positive control anti-inflammatory drug (indomethacin) with a concentration of 10 mg/Kg, the plant extract at the concentration of 100 mg/Kg, significantly reduced both carrageenan (26.6 % inhibition after 3 hrs post-injection, compared to 38 per cent for indomethacin), and prostaglandin E2 induced paw oedema (25.3 % inhibition after 24 min post-injection, compared to 13 per cent for indomethacin) also TPA induced ear oedema weight (42.4 % inhibition after 4 hrs of post-injection, compared to 59.7 % for indomethacin). An intragastrically administered dose of 1.69 g/Kg of a 50 % aqueous-ethanol  G. wilfordii  extract significantly reduced the thickening in the paw oedema caused by carrageenan one hour after carrageenan injection in Sprague-Dawley rats for five days. This effect was much stronger than the 0.1 mg/kg of acetylsalicylic acid, which is taken as a positive control ( Huang et al., 2015 ). The extract demonstrated potential action against the TNF-α, an essential signalling protein in many inflammatory responses, under the influence of concentration, according to research done in vitro by the same authors using L929 murine fibrosarcoma cells. Anti-inflammatory potential in percentage inhibition of various extracts of  Geranium  species such as methanol, ethanol, ethyl acetate, and Aqueous using different  in vivo  animal models is shown in  Table 4 . Table 4 Anti-inflammatory potential in percentage inhibition of various extracts of  Geranium  species such as methanol, ethanol, ethyl acetate, and Aqueous using different  in vivo  animal models. Positive controls (standard) are also used, such as indomethacin, aspirin, and diclofenac. Geranium  species Extract used/standard Methods/Animal Models Conc. of extract Conc. of standard %age Inhibition of extract %age Inhibition of standard References G. finitimum Methanol/Indomethacin Carrageenan-induced paw oedema 100 mg/Kg 10 mg/Kg 26.6 38 % ( Küpeli et al., 2007 ) G. wilfordii Ethanol/Aspirin Carrageenan-induced paw oedema 1.69 g/kg 0.1 mg/kg 33.3 % 35.6 ( Huang et al., 2015 ) G. thunbergii Ethanol LPS stimulated RAW 264.7 cells 50 µg/mL – 60 % – ( Sung et al., 2018 ) G. bellum Aqueous acetone/diclofenac carrageenan-induced paw oedema 300 mg/kg 30 mg/Kg 41.1 % 47.2 % ( Velázquez-González et al., 2014 ) G. sibiricum Ethanol Phorbol-12-myristate 13-acetate plus calcium ionophore A23187 (PMACI) 50–200 mg/mL – 52 % – ( Shim, Oh, & Lim, 2009 ) G. nepalense Ethyl acetate/aspirin TPA-induced ear oedema 2.5 g/Kg 0.6 g/kg – – ( Lu, Li, Li, Liang, & Shen, 2012 ) G. pratense Aqueous/indomethacin PGE2-induced hind paw edema (100 mg/kg 10 mg/kg 38.4 % 32.4 % ( Piwowarski et al., 2014 ) G. carolinianum Aqueous/indomethacin Fresh egg white-induced acute paw oedema 500 mg/Kg 5 mg/Kg 40.5 % 69.7 ( Li et al., 2016 ) G. koreanum Dichloromethane Acute Reflux Esophagitis-Induced Rats 200 µg/mL – 89 % – ( Nam, Nan, & Choo, 2018 )\nAnti-inflammatory potential in percentage inhibition of various extracts of  Geranium  species such as methanol, ethanol, ethyl acetate, and Aqueous using different  in vivo  animal models. Positive controls (standard) are also used, such as indomethacin, aspirin, and diclofenac.\nReactive oxygen species (ROS) consists of alkoxyl, hydroperoxyl, hydroxyl, superoxide, and alkoxyl radicals ( Mehraj et al., 2022 ). Two nitrogen free radicals include nitric acid and nitrogen dioxide. Free radicals of nitrogen and oxygen can be transformed into reactive species that are not radicals, like hypochlorous acid, hydrogen peroxide, and peroxynitrite. Under both pathological and physiological circumstances, aerobic cells produce reactive nitrogen species, ROS, and reactive chlorine species ( Evans & Halliwell, 2001 ). Thus, radical and non-radical species are included in RNS and ROS. The antioxidant system keeps these species at extremely low steady-state concentrations, but when their formation rises, they could be able to outpace the antioxidant system’s scavenger function, causing oxidative stress and harm to biological targets  ( Fig. 5 ) . The antioxidant potential has been the most evaluated biological activity in the  Geranium  genus; there are about 30 species of  Geranium  studied in various geographical regions. Different analytical methods have been utilized to assess the antioxidant potential of various  Geranium  extracts. The 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) free radical scavenging method has been used for most evaluations; it is widely utilized in vitro to determine antioxidant potential due to its speed, simplicity, and low cost in contrast to other methods ( Alam & Bristi, 2013 ). Ferric-reducing antioxidant power (FRAP), hydroxyl radical scavenging, and reducing power are some other electron transfer-based assays that have also been utilized in some cases. The antioxidant potential of various  Geranium  species has been evaluated:  G. bellum  ( Camacho-Luis et al., 2008 ),  G. sibiricum  and  G. robertianum  ( Ben Jemia, Aidi Wannes, Ouchikh, Bruno, & Kchouk, 2013 ), and  Geranium purpureum  ( Şöhretoğlu, Sakar, Sabuncuoğlu, Özgüneş, & Sterner, 2011 ). Antioxidant potential and total phenolics content of  Geranium  species were determined using various methods such as DPPH, FRAP, and ABTS, as shown in  Table 5 . Fig. 5 Generation of radical oxygen species (ROS) in the cell in different ways, including radiations, cell uptake of microbes, enzymatic reaction, etc. Table 5 Antioxidant potential and total phenolics content of  Geranium  species, using various methods such as DPPH, FRAP, and ABTS method. Different solvents, like ethanol, methanol, ethyl acetate, and water, were used. Geranium  species Part used Extract Method Antioxidant activity Total phenolics content References G. sibiricum Whole plant Aqueous DPPH (IC 50 ) 2.92 µg/mL 169.46 mg GAE/g ( Wu et al., 2010 ) G. tuberosum Aerial parts Ethyl acetate DPPH (%age inhibition) 90 – ( Söhretoglu, Sakar, Ekizoglu, & Özalp, 2007 ) G. sanguineum Aerial roots Methanol DPPH (IC 50 ) 13.86 ± 0.84 µg/mL 34.60 % (w/w) ( Sokmen et al., 2005 ) G. thunbergii leaves and Stem Methanol IAC water-soluble substances 598.7 ± 10.9 µmol AA/g 53.3 ± 2.8 mg GAE/g ( Kim et al., 2008 ) G. sylvicatum Aerial parts Methanol/Aqueous DPPH (IC 50 ) 30 µg/mL – ( Nikolova, Tsvetkova, & Ivancheva, 2010 ) G. tuberosum Aerial parts Methanol/Aqueous H 2 O 2 – ILP (%age inhibition) 50 – ( Şöhretoğlu, Sakar, Sabuncuoğlu, Özgüneş, & Sterner, 2009 ) G. wallichianum Roots Ethyl acetate DPPH (IC 50 ) 19.05 ± 0.90 µg/mL – ( Ismail et al., 2009 ) G. wilfordii Whole plant Methanol/Aqueous FRAP 347.33 ± 7.99 µmol Fe 2+ /g 14.98 ± 0.64 mg GAE/g ( Gan et al., 2010 ) G. lucidum Aerial parts Methanol/Aqueous DPPH (IC 50 ) 45 µg/mL – ( Nikolova et al., 2010 ) G. molle Whole plant Aqueous DPPH (IC 50 ) 324 ± 9 µg/mL 79 ± 1 mg GAE/g ( Graça et al., 2016b ) G. nepalense Whole plant Ethanol/Aqueous DPPH (IC 50 ) 46.3 ± 0.84 µg/mL 169.4 ± 7.84 mg GAE/g ( Sim, Jang, Lee, Jung, & Cho, 2017 ) G. niveum Roots Methanol/Chloroform DPPH (IC 50 ) 7.3 µg/mL – ( Calzada et al., 1998 ) G. pratense Leaves & flowers Aqueous DPPH (%age inhibition) 13 – ( Myagmar & Aniya, 2000 ) G. psilostemon Aerial parts EtOAc DPPH (%age inhibition) 80 – ( Söhretoglu et al., 2007 ) G. purpureum Leaves Ground material Protection factor 3.1 – ( Proestos, Boziaris, Nychas, & Komaitis, 2006 ) G. ruizii Whole plant EtOH/H2O DPPH (%age inhibition) 23.7 – ( Söhretoglu et al., 2007 ) G. robertianum Whole plant Aqueous DPPH (EC 50 ) 65 ± 1 µg/mL 228 ± mg GAE/g ( Graça et al., 2016a ) G. pyrenaicum Aerial parts MeOH/H2O DPPH (IC 50 ) 13.61 µg/mL – ( Nikolova et al., 2010 ) G. lasiopus Aerial parts Ethyl acetate DPPH (%age inhibition) 80.143 – ( Şöhretoğlu, Ekizoğlu, Özalp, & Sakar, 2008 ) G. glaberrimum Aerial parts Ethyl acetate DPPH (%age inhibition) 90 – ( Söhretoglu et al., 2007 ) G. ayavacence Whole plant Aqueous DPPH (IC 50 ) 19 µg/mL – ( Okuhama et al., 2002 ) G. bellum Aerial parts Ethyl acetate ABTS (%age inhibition) 95 – ( Camacho-Luis et al., 2008 ) G. caeruleum Aerial parts Methanol/Aqueous DPPH (IC 50 ) 30 µg/mL – ( Nikolova et al., 2010 ) G. collinum Aerial parts Ethanol/Aqueous DPPH (IC 50 ) 0.027 ± 0.002 mg/mL 131.7 ± 7.86 mg GAE/g ( Sapko, Chebonenko, Utarbaeva, Amirkulova, & Tursunova, 2016 ) G. favosum Whole plant Dichloromethane DPPH (%age inhibition) 16.38 0.254 ± 0.02 mg GAE/g ( Adam et al., 2018 ) G. columbinum Aerial parts Methanol/Aqueous DPPH (IC 50 ) 30 µg/mL – ( Nikolova et al., 2010 )\nGeneration of radical oxygen species (ROS) in the cell in different ways, including radiations, cell uptake of microbes, enzymatic reaction, etc.\nAntioxidant potential and total phenolics content of  Geranium  species, using various methods such as DPPH, FRAP, and ABTS method. Different solvents, like ethanol, methanol, ethyl acetate, and water, were used.\nLeishmania  tropica is the causative agent of the neglected tropical illness leishmaniasis ( Kaye & Scott, 2011 ). This parasite is peculiar to approximately 100 countries and has an annual incidence rate of about 1.2 million. Conventionally prescribed antileishmanial medications are frequently ineffective, toxic and extremely costly. Antimonials were once thought to be promising treatments for leishmaniasis, but because  Leishmania tropica  has become resistant to them, the medication has lost its efficacy. Therefore, the scientific community is working to create substitute treatments for it. Since then, a lot of research has been done to create Magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) for the treatment of leishmaniasis. Various MNPs have been used for the cytotoxic evaluation against Leishmanial parasites in various  in-vitro  investigations ( Hameed et al., 2019 ). However, the cytotoxicity activity of biogenic NiONPs against  L. tropica  has not received much attention.\nResearch conducted by ( Khalil et al., 2018 ) on the antileishmanial activity of biogenic NiONPs was determined against  L. tropica . According to this study, leishmanial parasites were subjected to 1–200 μg ml −1  concentration of NiONPs for 72 h and demonstrated concentration-dependent suppression of  Leishmania tropica . As the concentration of NiONPs increased, there was also an increase in antileishmanial activity. NiONPs demonstrated remarkable antileishmanial potential against  L. tropica  promastigotes with an IC 50  value of 22.12 μg mL −1 . Similarly, IONPs showed antileishmanial activity against  L. tropica  amastigotes with an IC 50  of 26.58 μg mL −1 , which is confirmed by previous investigations of biogenic NiONPs ( Khalil et al., 2018 ). Future medications utilizing NiONP materials may have potent antileishmanial drug delivery due to reduced IC 50  and dose dependence. An overview of various methods of synthesis of nanoparticles from plant extracts is shown in  Fig. 6 . Fig. 6 An overview of the several processes used to produce nanoparticles from plant extracts. Nanoparticles are synthesized by three methods: chemical synthesis (chemical reaction), physical synthesis (laser ablation) and biological synthesis (extraction of bioactive substances).\nAn overview of the several processes used to produce nanoparticles from plant extracts. Nanoparticles are synthesized by three methods: chemical synthesis (chemical reaction), physical synthesis (laser ablation) and biological synthesis (extraction of bioactive substances).\n\nMany plants in the genus  Geranium  provide positive biological activities that have been scientifically proven. Many species appear to have clear therapeutic capability for a range of ailments, based on studies conducted to evaluate the corresponding biological activity. Numerous novel compounds have been shown to provide a variety of therapeutic benefits, such as anticancer activity, cholinesterase inhibition, antiparasitic activities, and antifungal and antiviral activities. These studies authenticate the wide range of the  Geranium  plant’s pharmacological applications, possibly serving as a vast drug discovery resource. Additionally, it might clarify the medicinal benefits of herbal medications derived from  Geranium . A lot needs to be explored concerning the biological and phytochemical investigation of the phytochemistry of the  Geranium  species. The biological components of other species of  Geranium  remain unexploited. Secondly, all biological activities of isolated compounds are carried out  in-vitro  experiments, and significantly fewer reports are documented in the  in-vivo  studies. The biological activities of constituents derived from  Geranium  should be evaluated in  in-vitro  and  in-vivo  models to study and utilize this genus for diverse attributes further. The  Geranium  genus is rich in new and novel compounds, but only a few species are current study subjects. More new compounds from other species should be studied in detail in the future. The studies on the pharmacological effects of compounds derived from  Geranium  are inclusive. Still, current research is limited to extracts, so it is essential to concentrate on the effects of  Geranium  compounds and the future relationship between structure and activity.\n\nThe research was funded by Deanship of Postgraduate Studies and Scientific Research at Majmaah University, Saudi Arabia, for supporting this work under Project Number No. R-2024-962.\n\nThe authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.","source_license":"CC-BY-4.0","license_restricted":false}