{"paper_id":"50192fc8-e2e7-498c-b5c9-d86335a76a12","body_text":"Zusammenfassung\nEtwa ein Drittel aller Frauen in der Postmenopause erlebt klimakterische Beschwerden, die zur Hormonersatztherapie Anlass geben. Der therapeutische Nutzen einer Östrogensubstitution ist dabei eindeutig belegt, zumal Östrogenmangelerscheinungen letztlich alle Organsysteme betreffen können. Eine besondere Herausforderung stellt dabei die Hormonsubstitution der postmenopausalen Frau mit Endometriose und/oder Myomen dar, denn beide benignen Erkrankungen sind hormonabhängig und können durch eine Hormonersatztherapie negativ beeinflusst werden. Beide Erkrankungen treten selten postmenopausal auf, können jedoch die Lebensqualität der betroffenen Frauen stark beeinflussen. Eine HRT ist aber auch bei diesen Patientinnen möglich, sofern im Vorfeld eine genaue Nutzen-Risiken-Evaluation erfolgt und die HRT denjenigen Patientinnen vorbehalten ist, die unter starken klimakterischen Beschwerden leiden. Bei einer aktiven postmenopausalen Endometriose bzw. symptomatischem Myom sollte zunächst operativ behandelt werden. Soll eine Östrogentherapie erfolgen, muss das Risiko einer malignen Entartung bedacht werden. In jedem Fall ist die Kombinationstherapie einer Östrogenmonotherapie vorzuziehen. Aktuelle Daten weisen darauf hin, dass eine HRT mit Tibolon und Aromataseinhibitoren erfolgversprechend und nebenwirkungsarm zu sein schein.\nAbstract\nAbout one third of all postmenopausal women need hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and hypoestrogenism affects most organ systems. The therapeutic benefit of HRT is well proven and in postmenopausal women with endometriosis and/or uterine myoma represents a special challenge. Both benign diseases are estrogen-dependent and can be negatively influenced by HRT. Cases of endometriosis/uterine myoma in postmenopausal women are rare but can severely influence the quality of life of those women affected. A HRT is still feasible as long as the advantages and disadvantages are taken into account but should be reserved for patients with severe hypoestrogenism. In cases of active endometriosis and symptomatic myoma surgical therapy should be preferentially performed. As estrogen replacement can be associated with a higher risk of recurrence or malignant transformation, combined preparations should be chosen instead of estrogen monotherapy. Although there is no firm evidence tibolone and aromatase inhibitors appear to be the optimal choice.\nSimilar content being viewed by others\nLiteratur\nPunnonen R, Klemi PJ, Nikkanen V (1980) Postmenopausal endometriosis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 11(3):195–200\nFatemi HM, Al-Turki HA, Papanikolaou EG et al (2005) Successful treatment of an aggressive recurrent post-menopausal endometriosis with an aromatase inhibitor. Reprod Biomed Online 11(4):455–457\nAl Kadri H, Hassan S, Al-Fozan HM et al (2009) Hormone therapy for endometriosis and surgical menopause. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 21(1):CD005997. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD005997.pub2\nManero MG, Royo P, Olartecoechea B et al (2009) Endometriosis in a postmenopausal woman without previous hormonal therapy: a case report. J Med Case Rep 18(3):135. doi:10.1186/1752-1947-3-135\nBendon CL, Becker CM (2012) Potential mechanisms of postmenopausal endometriosis. Maturitas 72(3):214–219. doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2012.04.010\nStern RC, Dash R, Bentley RC et al (2001) Malignancy in endometriosis: frequency and comparison of ovarian and extraovarian types. Int J Gynecol Pathol 20(2):133–139\nOxholm D, Knudsen UB, Kryger-Baggesen N et al (2007) Postmenopausal endometriosis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 86(10):1158–1164\nBorgfeldt C, Andolf E (2004) Cancer risk after hospital discharge diagnosis of benign ovarian cysts and endometriosis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 83(4):395–400\nPalep-Singh M, Gupta S (2009) Endometriosis: associations with menopause, hormone replacement therapy and cancer. Menopause Int 15(4):169–174. doi:10.1258/mi.2009.009041\nButtram VC Jr, Reiter RC (1981) Uterine leiomyomata: etiology, symptomatology, and management. Fertil Steril 36(4):433–445\nCramer SF, Patel A (1990) The frequency of uterine leiomyomas. Am J Clin Pathol 94(4):435–438\nChiaffarino F, Parazzini F, La Vecchia C et al (1999) Diet and uterine myomas. Obstet Gynecol 94(3):395–398\nChen L, Bouley DM, Harris BT et al (2001) MRI study of immediate cell viability in focused ultrasound lesions in the rabbit brain. J Magn Reson Imaging 13(1):23–30\nKjerulff KH, Langenberg P, Seidman JD et al (1996) Uterine leiomyomas. Racial differences in severity, symptoms and age at diagnosis. J Reprod Med 41(7): 483–490\nMarshall LM, Spiegelman D, Manson JE et al (1998) Risk of uterine leiomyomata among premenopausal women in relation to body size and cigarette smoking. Epidemiology 9(5):511–517\nRoss RK, Pike MC, Vessey MP et al (1986) Risk factors for uterine fibroids: reduced risk associated with oral contraceptives. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 293(6543):359–362\nGöretzlehner G, Lauritzen C, Göretzlehner U (Hrsg) (2007) Praktische Hormontherapie in der Gynäkologie, 5. Aufl. De Gruyter, Berlin, S 16–27\nCust MP, Gangar KF, Hillard TC et al (1990) A risk-benefit assessment of estrogen therapy in postmenopausal women. Drug Saf 5(5):345–358\nKeck C, Neulen J, Meinert B (Hrsg) (1997) Endokrinologie reproduktionsmedizin andrologie. Georg Thieme, Stuttgart, S 39–49\nPalomba S, Sena T, Noia R et al (2001) Transdermal hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women with uterine leiomyomas. Obstet Gynecol 98(6):1053–1058\nPalomba S, Sena T, Morelli M et al (2002) Effect of different doses of progestin on uterine leiomyomas in postmenopausal women. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 102(2):199–201\nPolatti F, Viazzo F, Colleoni R et al (2000) Uterine myoma in postmenopause: a comparison between two therapeutic schedules of HRT. Maturitas 37(1):27–32\nColacurci N, De Franciscis P, Cobellis L et al (2000) Effects of hormone replacement therapy on postmenopausal uterine myoma. Maturitas 35(2):167–173\nArcher DF, Hendrix S, Gallagher JC et al (2006) Endometrial effects of tibolone. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 92(3):911–918\nFedele L, Bianchi S, Raffaeli R et al (1999) Comparison of transdermal estradiol and tibolone for the treatment of oophorectomized women with deep residual endometriosis. Maturitas 32:189–193\nSoliman NF, Hillard TC (2006) Hormone replacement therapy in women with past history of endometriosis. Climacteric 9(5):325–335\nKenemans P, Bundred NJ, Foidart JM et al (2009) LIBERATE Study Group. Safety and efficacy of tibolone in breast-cancer patients with vasomotor symptoms: a double-blind, randomised, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol 10(2):135–146. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70341−70343\nGregoriou O, Konidaris S, Botsis D et al (2001) Long term effects of tibolone on postmenopausal women with uterine myomas. Maturitas 40(1):95–99\nFedele L, Bianchi S, Raffaelli R et al (2000) A randomized study of the effects of tibolone and transdermal estrogen replacement therapy in postmenopausal women with uterine myomas. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 88(1):91–94\nAmsterdam LL, Gentry W, Jobanputra S et al (2005) Anastrozole and oral contraceptives: a novel treatment for endometriosis. Fertil Steril 84:300–304\nPolyzos NP, Fatemi HM, Zavos A et al (2011) Aromatase inhibitors in post-menopausal endometriosis. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 9:90. doi:10.1186/1477-7827-9-90\nSoysal S, Soysal ME, Ozer S et al (2004) The effects of postsurgical administration of goserelin plus anastrozole compared to goserelin alone in patients with severe endometriosis: a prospective randomized trial. Hum Reprod 19:160–167\nChwalisz K, Perez MC, Demanno D et al (2005) Selective progesterone receptor modulator development and use in the treatment of leiomyomata and endometriosis. Endocr Rev 26:423–438\nChwalisz K, Mattia-Goldberg C, Lee M et al (2004) Treatment of endometriosis with the novel selective progesterone receptor modulator (SPRM) Asoprisnil. Fertil Steril 82:S83–S84\nVarelas FK, Papanicolaou AN, Vavatsi-Christaki N et al (2007) The effect of anastrozole on symptomatic uterine leiomyomata. Obstet Gynecol 110:643–649\nParsanezhad ME, Azmoon M, Alborzi S et al (2010) A randomized controlled clinical trial comparing the effects of aromatase inhibitor (letrozole) and gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (triptorelin) on uterine leiomyoma volume and hormonal status. Fertil Steril 93:192–198\nGurates B, Parmaksiz C, Kilic G et al (2008) Treatment of symptomatic uterine leiomyoma with letrozole. Reprod Biomed Online 17(4):569–574\nInteressenkonflikt\nDer korrespondierende Autor gibt für sich und seine Koautoren an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.\nAuthor information\nAuthors and Affiliations\nCorresponding author\nAdditional information\nSDS und JB: geteilte Erstautorenschaft.\nRights and permissions\nAbout this article\nCite this article\nSchäfer, S., Braun, J. & Kiesel, L. Hormontherapie bei gynäkologischen, nichtmalignen Erkrankungen. Gynäkologe 46, 165–169 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00129-012-3071-0\nPublished:\nIssue date:\nDOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00129-012-3071-0","source_license":"CC0","license_restricted":false}