{"paper_id":"4e6f0591-c634-4297-aa7b-397444599efd","body_text":"Ovarian cancer is one of the most frequent and lethal gynecological malignancies affecting women worldwide, with a particularly high \nincidence and mortality rate in India population based registries generally report ASR values roughly in the 4-8 per 100,000 ranges, with \nurban registries such as Delhi and Pune at the higher end [ 1 ]. Ovarian cancer as an important but \nless common female malignancy globally, with an age standardized incidence around 6-7 per 100,000 women per year, consistent with GLOBOCAN \n2020 estimates of about 314,000 new cases worldwide in 2020 [ 2 ]. It is often referred to as a \n\"silent killer\" due to the absence of specific early symptoms and the lack of effective screening tools for timely detection [ 3 ]. \nThe disease largely arises from the ovarian surface epithelium, where chronic overstimulation by female hormones-such as estrogen, luteinizing \nhormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH)-can cause epithelial erosion and neoplastic transformation [ 4 ]. \nOvarian cancer is often asymptomatic in its early stages and thus most patients have widespread disease at the time of investigation \n[ 5 ]. Among various biomarkers, cancer antigen 125 (CA125), a high-molecular-weight glycoprotein \nderived from coelomic epithelium, is widely recognized as a tumor marker in epithelial ovarian carcinoma [ 5 ]. \nCA125 is expressed as a membrane bound protein at the surface of cells that undergo metaplastic differentiation into mullerian type \nepithelium or released in soluble form in bodily fluids [ 7 ]. It is normally expressed in tissues of \nMullerian origin, including the endometrium, fallopian tubes and peritoneum, but not on the ovarian surface epithelium [ 8 ]. \nA huge number of novel biomarkers have been presented as promising in the diagnosis of ovarian cancer but CA125 is in the top and currently \nmost used in clinical practice [ 9 ]. Elevated serum levels of CA125 are observed in approximately \n80-95% of women with clinically detectable ovarian cancer, particularly in advanced stages [ 9 ]. The \nnormal reference range for serum CA125 is considered below 35U/ml. Additionally, more people are reporting benign gynaecological diseases \nsuch endometriosis and pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) in part because of improved awareness and diagnosis [ 10 ]. \nAn estimated 6-10% of women of reproductive age worldwide suffer with endometriosis, which is becoming more widely acknowledged as a significant \ncontributor to infertility and persistent pelvic pain [ 11 ]. Benign disorders include endometriosis, \nPID, fibroids, pregnancy, menstruation and benign ovarian cysts can cause mild to moderate rise of CA-125 \n[ 9 ].\nAlthough CA125 is not an effective screening tool for asymptomatic women due to limited specificity and false positives in benign \nconditions [ 6 ], it remains an important diagnostic aid in women at high risk of ovarian cancer such \nas those with a family history of hereditary ovarian malignancies when used in combination with pelvic ultrasonography and transvaginal \nsonography [ 12 ]. Because benign disease can also raise CA 125, a single value just above 35 U/mL has \nlimited specificity; very high values (for example >200 U/mL) in a woman with an adnexal mass, especially postmenopausal, are much more \nsuggestive of malignancy than benign pathology [ 13 ]. Age, body mass index (BMI), parity, smoking and \nsocioeconomic status have also been identified as potential risk modifiers associated with altered CA125 levels and disease progression \n[ 9 ]. The present study was undertaken to measure serum CA125 levels in patients with ovarian tumors \nand to correlate these values with clinical diagnosis, demographic factors, and tumor type. By comparing patients with benign and malignant \novarian tumors to healthy controls, the study aims to evaluate the diagnostic significance of CA125 and its association with known risk \nfactors, thereby enhancing its clinical interpretability in the Indian population. CA125 is considered an important predictive and \nprognostic biomarker in CA125-positive ovarian cancers and plays a significant role in the diagnosis, prognosis, and monitoring of \ntreatment response in ovarian cancer patients. The protective effect of early and multiple pregnancies is believed to result from a reduced \nnumber of lifetime ovulatory cycles and hormonal fluctuations, whereas late marriage and delayed or absent childbearing prolong uninterrupted \novulation, which has been associated with an increased risk of ovarian carcinogenesis. Therefore, it is of interest to evaluate the \ndiagnostic significance of serum CA125 levels and their association with clinical and demographic risk factors in patients with ovarian \ntumors.\n\nThe present cross-sectional comparative study was conducted to evaluate serum CA125 levels in patients diagnosed with ovarian tumors \nand to correlate their levels with clinical diagnosis and associated risk factors. For that total of 150 female subjects, aged above 20 \nyears, in which 50 control group healthy women without any adnexal pathology, 50 benign ovarian tumors and 50 malignant ovarian tumors \ndiagnosed with histopathological confirmed malignant ovarian tumors. All participants were enrolled from the department of Biochemistry, \nDarbhanga medical college.\n\nA 2 ml of venous blood collected from the antecubital vein by syringe with all antiseptic precaution. The serum was separated and stored \nat -80°C for farther analysis. Serum CA125 levels were estimated using a through Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) as per protocol. \nA detailed clinical history was obtained from each participant, covering age, parity, smoking habits, BMI and socioeconomic status.\n\nAll data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical analysis was performed using the student's t-test and \none-way ANOVA, followed by appropriate post hoc tests to assess the significance of differences among groups. Correlations between serum \nCA125 levels and clinical parameters (age, BMI, smoking, parity and socioeconomic status) were evaluated using the Pearson correlation \ncoefficient. A p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.\n\nThe present study included 150 female patients divided into three groups: 50 healthy controls, 50 patients with benign ovarian tumors \nand 50 patients with malignant ovarian tumors. All study participants were above 20 years of age. The clinical and demographic parameters \nstudied were age, body mass index (BMI), smoking habits, parity and socioeconomic status and their correlation with serum CA125 levels was \nevaluated. The mean serum CA125 level in the control group was 18.50 ± 12.35 U/ml in the range of 2 - 44 U/ml, it was observed that \nin benign ovarian tumor group it was 186.48 ± 103.20 U/ml and in the malignant ovarian tumor group it was 1045.28 ± 281.96 \nU/ml. The difference between the three groups was statistically significant (p < 0.005) showed in Table 1 (see PDF). This finding \nindicates a progressive increase in serum CA125 concentration from normal to benign and malignant conditions. The age specific incidence \nrate (ASIR) for ovarian cancer revealed that the disease affects the women [ 14 ]. A significant \ninverse correlation was observed between age and serum CA125 levels among healthy controls (p = 0.001), indicating a gradual decline of \nCA125 levels with increasing age. In benign ovarian tumor cases, serum CA125 levels also decreased with age (p < 0.005) Figure 1 (see PDF). \nHowever, in malignant ovarian tumor patients, CA125 levels showed a positive correlation with age, increasing steadily in older age groups \n(p < 0.005).\nHigher level of CA125 observed in obese women. Individuals with a BMI of 30Kg/m 2  or higher have a 23 % higher risk of cancer \nthan non-obese individuals [ 15 ]. The mean serum CA125 levels increased with rising BMI in all study \ngroups. In the control group, the mean levels were 11.29 ± 6.98 U/ml for BMI < 25 kg/m 2 , 16.56 ± 11.31 U/ml \nfor BMI 25-29 kg/m 2  and 35.20 ± 17.6 U/ml for BMI ≥ 30 kg/m 2  (p < 0.005). A similar trend was noted in \nmalignant ovarian tumor cases where levels rose from 948.57 ± 308.28 U/ml (< 25 kg/m 2 ) to 1099.41 ± 273.79 \nU/ml (> 30 kg/m 2 ; p < 0.005) as showed in Figure 2 (see PDF). These findings demonstrate a positive association between \nobesity and elevated CA125 concentration. In the control group, there was no significant difference in CA125 levels between smokers (SM) \n(19.15 ± 11.53 U/ml) and non-smokers (NSM) (19.99 ± 11.61 U/ml; p = 0.654). However, in the benign and malignant groups, \nsmokers had significantly higher CA125 concentrations (221.52 ± 113.92 U/ml and 1065.89 ± 265.27 U/ml, respectively; \np < 0.005**) as showed in Figure 3 (see PDF), suggesting that smoking may influence tumor-related antigen expression. Serum CA125 levels declined \nwith increasing parity across all study groups. Among healthy controls, mean values were 27.73 ± 9.55 U/ml (nulliparous), 22.53 \n± 12.00 U/ml (primiparous) and 9.8 ± 7.94 U/ml (multiparous; p < 0.005). A similar trend was observed in malignant \novarian tumor patients, where mean levels were 1061.30 ± 255.87 U/ml, 1025.43 ± 243.23 U/ml and 998.93 ± 235.06 \nU/ml respectively (p < 0.005) as showed in Figure 4 (see PDF). These findings indicate that lower parity is a potential risk factor for \nelevated CA125 levels and malignant transformation. Serum CA125 levels showed a positive association with socioeconomic status. In the \ncontrol group, mean CA125 levels were 270.16 ± 89.04 U/ml for high socioeconomic status, 161.00 ± 84.71 U/ml for middle and \n130.33 ± 80.60 U/ml for low status (p < 0.005) as showed in Figure 5 (see PDF). A similar pattern was noted in benign and malignant groups, \nsuggesting lifestyle and dietary factors associated with higher socioeconomic classes may contribute to increased CA125 expression. Direct \ncomparison revealed that CA125 levels were substantially higher in malignant tumors (1045.28 ± 281.96 U/ml) compared to benign \ntumors (186.48 ± 103.20 U/ml; p < 0.005**) as showed in Figure 6 (see PDF). The increasing trend of serum CA125 levels with tumor \nstage and size further supports its diagnostic and prognostic value in ovarian malignancy. Serum CA125 levels were significantly higher in \nmalignant ovarian tumors compared with benign tumors and healthy controls, indicating its diagnostic value. CA125 levels increased with \nage in malignant cases but decreased in controls and benign tumors. Higher BMI and smoking were associated with elevated CA125, while \nhigher parity showed a protective effect. These findings support CA125 as a useful biomarker for ovarian cancer detection and risk \nassessment.\n\nCA125 is a useful diagnostic and prognostic marker that rises substantially from healthy controls to benign and then malignant ovarian \ntumors and in this study its levels also showed significant associations with age, BMI, smoking, parity and socioeconomic status \n[ 6 ]. The markedly higher values in malignant cases are consistent with reports that 80-90% of women \nwith advanced epithelial ovarian cancer have CA125 levels above the conventional cut-off of 35 U/ml [ 16 ]. \nThe findings reinforce that, while not disease-specific, CA125 remains the most widely used and clinically recommended tumor marker in \nthe diagnosis and follow-up of ovarian cancer [ 17 ]. At the same time, the findings highlight that \nCA125 values are not static, but are significantly influenced by demographic, reproductive and lifestyle factors, which must be considered \nwhen interpreting results [ 18 ]. Age-related analysis revealed an inverse correlation between age and \nCA125 levels in healthy and benign groups, whereas a positive correlation was observed among malignant cases [ 19 ]. \nConversely, the progressive rise with increasing age in malignant cases suggests that CA125 expression may be enhanced by age-related genomic \ninstability, chronic inflammation, or delayed detection of advanced-stage tumors in older women [ 20 ]. \nThe positive association between body mass index and CA125 in tumor groups suggests that obesity-related hormonal and inflammatory changes \nmay amplify tumor marker expression and potentially reflect higher risk or more advanced disease [ 21 ]. \nSmoking had little or even negative association with CA125 in healthy women but showed a positive association in benign and malignant \novarian tumors, indicating that tobacco exposure may interact with tumor biology or antigen metabolism rather than simply raising baseline \nlevels [ 22 ]. Low fertility, especially nulliparity, showed a strong association with higher CA125 \nin ovarian tumors, supporting the well-known link between reduced parity, higher lifetime ovulatory cycles and increased ovarian cancer \nrisk [ 23 ]. Parity emerged as another key determinant, with CA125 levels decreasing progressively \nwith increasing parity in all groups [ 24 ]. Nulliparous women had the highest CA125 values, while \nmultiparous women demonstrated significantly lower concentrations [ 25 ]. Reduced parity is a well-\nestablished risk factor for ovarian cancer, possibly due to uninterrupted ovulatory cycles leading to repeated epithelial injury and \ninflammation [ 26 ]. Socioeconomic status (SES) also showed a positive association with serum CA125 \nlevels. Women from higher socioeconomic backgrounds had greater CA125 values across all groups [ 27 ]. \nThis pattern may reflect lifestyle factors, dietary habits, delayed childbearing or increased exposure to environmental risk contributors \ncommon in higher SES populations [ 28 ]. Finally, the direct comparison between benign and malignant \ntumors demonstrated a stark rise in CA125 levels in malignancy, affirming its diagnostic value [ 29 ]. \nThe strong statistical association emphasizes the utility of CA125 not only for diagnosis but also for distinguishing benign from malignant \novarian masses [ 30 ]. Overall, this study reinforces CA125 as an easy, rapid and sensitive test with \nsubstantial diagnostic and prognostic utility but underscores that its optimal use requires contextual interpretation alongside age, BMI, \nsmoking, fertility, socioeconomic factors and clinical-imaging findings rather than as an isolated screening tool. The risk of ovarian \nmalignancy algorithm, which divides women with adnexal masses into low- or high-risk groups based on serum HE4 and CA-125, can achieve \ndiagnostic accuracy of 90-95% in some trials.\n\nThe authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to \ninfluence the work reported in this paper.\n\nThe authors received no funding.\n\nAvailability of data is not applicable as this study involves publicly available data.\n\nConsent for publication is not applicable as this study involves publicly available data.","source_license":"CC-BY-4.0","license_restricted":false}