{"paper_id":"4c3cceca-276f-436d-9fdf-0f8469ded42d","body_text":"Measuring life satisfaction of self-help groups:... | F1000Research <!-- --> <!-- --> <!-- This is commented out to fix display problems on mobile devices. We may use it again once we implement a responsive design that supports native device resolutions. --> \"use strict\";function _typeof(t){return(_typeof=\"function\"==typeof Symbol&&\"symbol\"==typeof Symbol.iterator?function(t){return typeof t}:function(t){return t&&\"function\"==typeof Symbol&&t.constructor===Symbol&&t!==Symbol.prototype?\"symbol\":typeof t})(t)}!function(){var t=function(){var t,e,o=[],n=window,r=n;for(;r;){try{if(r.frames.__tcfapiLocator){t=r;break}}catch(t){}if(r===n.top)break;r=r.parent}t||(!function t(){var e=n.document,o=!!n.frames.__tcfapiLocator;if(!o)if(e.body){var r=e.createElement(\"iframe\");r.style.cssText=\"display:none\",r.name=\"__tcfapiLocator\",e.body.appendChild(r)}else setTimeout(t,5);return!o}(),n.__tcfapi=function(){for(var t=arguments.length,n=new Array(t),r=0;r 3&&2===parseInt(n[1],10)&&\"boolean\"==typeof n[3]&&(e=n[3],\"function\"==typeof n[2]&&n[2](\"set\",!0)):\"ping\"===n[0]?\"function\"==typeof n[2]&&n[2]({gdprApplies:e,cmpLoaded:!1,cmpStatus:\"stub\"}):o.push(n)},n.addEventListener(\"message\",(function(t){var e=\"string\"==typeof t.data,o={};if(e)try{o=JSON.parse(t.data)}catch(t){}else o=t.data;var n=\"object\"===_typeof(o)&&null!==o?o.__tcfapiCall:null;n&&window.__tcfapi(n.command,n.version,(function(o,r){var a={__tcfapiReturn:{returnValue:o,success:r,callId:n.callId}};t&&t.source&&t.source.postMessage&&t.source.postMessage(e?JSON.stringify(a):a,\"*\")}),n.parameter)}),!1))};\"undefined\"!=typeof module?module.exports=t:t()}(); dataLayer = dataLayer || []; // Standard GTM initialization - Google Consent Mode handles consent automatically (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start': new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0], j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src= 'https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl+ '>m_auth=hzk0Vc3qFsQYhCrIoHz68A>m_preview=env-1>m_cookies_win=x';f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f); })(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-MWFK8L5J'); ;window.NREUM||(NREUM={});NREUM.init={distributed_tracing:{enabled:true},privacy:{cookies_enabled:true},ajax:{deny_list:[\"bam.nr-data.net\"]}}; ;NREUM.loader_config={accountID:\"438030\",trustKey:\"438030\",agentID:\"772317073\",licenseKey:\"97f8f67f26\",applicationID:\"772317073\"} ;NREUM.info={beacon:\"bam.nr-data.net\",errorBeacon:\"bam.nr-data.net\",licenseKey:\"97f8f67f26\",applicationID:\"772317073\",sa:1} ;/*! For license information please see nr-loader-spa-1.236.0.min.js.LICENSE.txt */ (()=>{\"use strict\";var e,t,r={5763:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{P_:()=>l,Mt:()=>g,C5:()=>s,DL:()=>v,OP:()=>T,lF:()=>D,Yu:()=>y,Dg:()=>h,CX:()=>c,GE:()=>b,sU:()=>_});var n=r(8632),i=r(9567);const o={beacon:n.ce.beacon,errorBeacon:n.ce.errorBeacon,licenseKey:void 0,applicationID:void 0,sa:void 0,queueTime:void 0,applicationTime:void 0,ttGuid:void 0,user:void 0,account:void 0,product:void 0,extra:void 0,jsAttributes:{},userAttributes:void 0,atts:void 0,transactionName:void 0,tNamePlain:void 0},a={};function s(e){if(!e)throw new Error(\"All info objects require an agent identifier!\");if(!a[e])throw new Error(\"Info for \".concat(e,\" was never set\"));return a[e]}function c(e,t){if(!e)throw new Error(\"All info objects require an agent identifier!\");a[e]=(0,i.D)(t,o),(0,n.Qy)(e,a[e],\"info\")}var u=r(7056);const d=()=>{const e={blockSelector:\"[data-nr-block]\",maskInputOptions:{password:!0}};return{allow_bfcache:!0,privacy:{cookies_enabled:!0},ajax:{deny_list:void 0,enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:10},distributed_tracing:{enabled:void 0,exclude_newrelic_header:void 0,cors_use_newrelic_header:void 0,cors_use_tracecontext_headers:void 0,allowed_origins:void 0},session:{domain:void 0,expiresMs:u.oD,inactiveMs:u.Hb},ssl:void 0,obfuscate:void 0,jserrors:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:10},metrics:{enabled:!0},page_action:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:30},page_view_event:{enabled:!0},page_view_timing:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:30,long_task:!1},session_trace:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:10},harvest:{tooManyRequestsDelay:60},session_replay:{enabled:!1,harvestTimeSeconds:60,sampleRate:.1,errorSampleRate:.1,maskTextSelector:\"*\",maskAllInputs:!0,get blockClass(){return\"nr-block\"},get ignoreClass(){return\"nr-ignore\"},get maskTextClass(){return\"nr-mask\"},get blockSelector(){return e.blockSelector},set blockSelector(t){e.blockSelector+=\",\".concat(t)},get maskInputOptions(){return e.maskInputOptions},set maskInputOptions(t){e.maskInputOptions={...t,password:!0}}},spa:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:10}}},f={};function l(e){if(!e)throw new Error(\"All configuration objects require an agent identifier!\");if(!f[e])throw new Error(\"Configuration for \".concat(e,\" was never set\"));return f[e]}function h(e,t){if(!e)throw new Error(\"All configuration objects require an agent identifier!\");f[e]=(0,i.D)(t,d()),(0,n.Qy)(e,f[e],\"config\")}function g(e,t){if(!e)throw new Error(\"All configuration objects require an agent identifier!\");var r=l(e);if(r){for(var n=t.split(\".\"),i=0;i {r.d(t,{D:()=>i});var n=r(50);function i(e,t){try{if(!e||\"object\"!=typeof e)return(0,n.Z)(\"Setting a Configurable requires an object as input\");if(!t||\"object\"!=typeof t)return(0,n.Z)(\"Setting a Configurable requires a model to set its initial properties\");const r=Object.create(Object.getPrototypeOf(t),Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptors(t)),o=0===Object.keys(r).length?e:r;for(let a in o)if(void 0!==e[a])try{\"object\"==typeof e[a]&&\"object\"==typeof t[a]?r[a]=i(e[a],t[a]):r[a]=e[a]}catch(e){(0,n.Z)(\"An error occurred while setting a property of a Configurable\",e)}return r}catch(e){(0,n.Z)(\"An error occured while setting a Configurable\",e)}}},6818:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{Re:()=>i,gF:()=>o,q4:()=>n});const n=\"1.236.0\",i=\"PROD\",o=\"CDN\"},385:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{FN:()=>a,IF:()=>u,Nk:()=>f,Tt:()=>s,_A:()=>o,il:()=>n,pL:()=>c,v6:()=>i,w1:()=>d});const n=\"undefined\"!=typeof window&&!!window.document,i=\"undefined\"!=typeof WorkerGlobalScope&&(\"undefined\"!=typeof self&&self instanceof WorkerGlobalScope&&self.navigator instanceof WorkerNavigator||\"undefined\"!=typeof globalThis&&globalThis instanceof WorkerGlobalScope&&globalThis.navigator instanceof WorkerNavigator),o=n?window:\"undefined\"!=typeof WorkerGlobalScope&&(\"undefined\"!=typeof self&&self instanceof WorkerGlobalScope&&self||\"undefined\"!=typeof globalThis&&globalThis instanceof WorkerGlobalScope&&globalThis),a=\"\"+o?.location,s=/iPad|iPhone|iPod/.test(navigator.userAgent),c=s&&\"undefined\"==typeof SharedWorker,u=(()=>{const e=navigator.userAgent.match(/Firefox[/\\s](\\d+\\.\\d+)/);return Array.isArray(e)&&e.length>=2?+e[1]:0})(),d=Boolean(n&&window.document.documentMode),f=!!navigator.sendBeacon},1117:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{w:()=>o});var n=r(50);const i={agentIdentifier:\"\",ee:void 0};class o{constructor(e){try{if(\"object\"!=typeof e)return(0,n.Z)(\"shared context requires an object as input\");this.sharedContext={},Object.assign(this.sharedContext,i),Object.entries(e).forEach((e=>{let[t,r]=e;Object.keys(i).includes(t)&&(this.sharedContext[t]=r)}))}catch(e){(0,n.Z)(\"An error occured while setting SharedContext\",e)}}}},8e3:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{L:()=>d,R:()=>c});var n=r(2177),i=r(1284),o=r(4322),a=r(3325);const s={};function c(e,t){const r={staged:!1,priority:a.p[t]||0};u(e),s[e].get(t)||s[e].set(t,r)}function u(e){e&&(s[e]||(s[e]=new Map))}function d(){let e=arguments.length>0&&void 0!==arguments[0]?arguments[0]:\"\",t=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]?arguments[1]:\"feature\";if(u(e),!e||!s[e].get(t))return a(t);s[e].get(t).staged=!0;const r=[...s[e]];function a(t){const r=e?n.ee.get(e):n.ee,a=o.X.handlers;if(r.backlog&&a){var s=r.backlog[t],c=a[t];if(c){for(var u=0;s&&u {let[t,r]=e;return r.staged}))&&(r.sort(((e,t)=>e[1].priority-t[1].priority)),r.forEach((e=>{let[t]=e;a(t)})))}function f(e,t){var r=e[1];(0,i.D)(t[r],(function(t,r){var n=e[0];if(r[0]===n){var i=r[1],o=e[3],a=e[2];i.apply(o,a)}}))}},2177:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{c:()=>f,ee:()=>u});var n=r(8632),i=r(2210),o=r(1284),a=r(5763),s=\"nr@context\";let c=(0,n.fP)();var u;function d(){}function f(e){return(0,i.X)(e,s,l)}function l(){return new d}function h(){u.aborted=!0,u.backlog={}}c.ee?u=c.ee:(u=function e(t,r){var n={},c={},f={},g=!1;try{g=16===r.length&&(0,a.OP)(r).isolatedBacklog}catch(e){}var p={on:b,addEventListener:b,removeEventListener:y,emit:v,get:x,listeners:w,context:m,buffer:A,abort:h,aborted:!1,isBuffering:E,debugId:r,backlog:g?{}:t&&\"object\"==typeof t.backlog?t.backlog:{}};return p;function m(e){return e&&e instanceof d?e:e?(0,i.X)(e,s,l):l()}function v(e,r,n,i,o){if(!1!==o&&(o=!0),!u.aborted||i){t&&o&&t.emit(e,r,n);for(var a=m(n),s=w(e),d=s.length,f=0;f<d;f++)s[f].apply(a,r);var l=T()[c[e]];return l&&l.push([p,e,r,a]),a}}function b(e,t){n[e]=w(e).concat(t)}function y(e,t){var r=n[e];if(r)for(var i=0;i {r.d(t,{E:()=>n,p:()=>i});var n=r(2177).ee.get(\"handle\");function i(e,t,r,i,o){o?(o.buffer([e],i),o.emit(e,t,r)):(n.buffer([e],i),n.emit(e,t,r))}},4322:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{X:()=>o});var n=r(5546);o.on=a;var i=o.handlers={};function o(e,t,r,o){a(o||n.E,i,e,t,r)}function a(e,t,r,i,o){o||(o=\"feature\"),e||(e=n.E);var a=t[o]=t[o]||{};(a[r]=a[r]||[]).push([e,i])}},3239:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{bP:()=>s,iz:()=>c,m$:()=>a});var n=r(385);let i=!1,o=!1;try{const e={get passive(){return i=!0,!1},get signal(){return o=!0,!1}};n._A.addEventListener(\"test\",null,e),n._A.removeEventListener(\"test\",null,e)}catch(e){}function a(e,t){return i||o?{capture:!!e,passive:i,signal:t}:!!e}function s(e,t){let r=arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2]&&arguments[2],n=arguments.length>3?arguments[3]:void 0;window.addEventListener(e,t,a(r,n))}function c(e,t){let r=arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2]&&arguments[2],n=arguments.length>3?arguments[3]:void 0;document.addEventListener(e,t,a(r,n))}},4402:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{Ht:()=>u,M:()=>c,Rl:()=>a,ky:()=>s});var n=r(385);const i=\"xxxxxxxx-xxxx-4xxx-yxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx\";function o(e,t){return e?15&e[t]:16*Math.random()|0}function a(){const e=n._A?.crypto||n._A?.msCrypto;let t,r=0;return e&&e.getRandomValues&&(t=e.getRandomValues(new Uint8Array(31))),i.split(\"\").map((e=>\"x\"===e?o(t,++r).toString(16):\"y\"===e?(3&o()|8).toString(16):e)).join(\"\")}function s(e){const t=n._A?.crypto||n._A?.msCrypto;let r,i=0;t&&t.getRandomValues&&(r=t.getRandomValues(new Uint8Array(31)));const a=[];for(var s=0;s {r.d(t,{Bq:()=>n,Hb:()=>o,oD:()=>i});const n=\"NRBA\",i=144e5,o=18e5},7894:(e,t,r)=>{function n(){return Math.round(performance.now())}r.d(t,{z:()=>n})},7243:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{e:()=>o});var n=r(385),i={};function o(e){if(e in i)return i[e];if(0===(e||\"\").indexOf(\"data:\"))return{protocol:\"data\"};let t;var r=n._A?.location,o={};if(n.il)t=document.createElement(\"a\"),t.href=e;else try{t=new URL(e,r.href)}catch(e){return o}o.port=t.port;var a=t.href.split(\"://\");!o.port&&a[1]&&(o.port=a[1].split(\"/\")[0].split(\"@\").pop().split(\":\")[1]),o.port&&\"0\"!==o.port||(o.port=\"https\"===a[0]?\"443\":\"80\"),o.hostname=t.hostname||r.hostname,o.pathname=t.pathname,o.protocol=a[0],\"/\"!==o.pathname.charAt(0)&&(o.pathname=\"/\"+o.pathname);var s=!t.protocol||\":\"===t.protocol||t.protocol===r.protocol,c=t.hostname===r.hostname&&t.port===r.port;return o.sameOrigin=s&&(!t.hostname||c),\"/\"===o.pathname&&(i[e]=o),o}},50:(e,t,r)=>{function n(e,t){\"function\"==typeof console.warn&&(console.warn(\"New Relic: \".concat(e)),t&&console.warn(t))}r.d(t,{Z:()=>n})},2587:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{N:()=>c,T:()=>u});var n=r(2177),i=r(5546),o=r(8e3),a=r(3325);const s={stn:[a.D.sessionTrace],err:[a.D.jserrors,a.D.metrics],ins:[a.D.pageAction],spa:[a.D.spa],sr:[a.D.sessionReplay,a.D.sessionTrace]};function c(e,t){const r=n.ee.get(t);e&&\"object\"==typeof e&&(Object.entries(e).forEach((e=>{let[t,n]=e;void 0===u[t]&&(s[t]?s[t].forEach((e=>{n?(0,i.p)(\"feat-\"+t,[],void 0,e,r):(0,i.p)(\"block-\"+t,[],void 0,e,r),(0,i.p)(\"rumresp-\"+t,[Boolean(n)],void 0,e,r)})):n&&(0,i.p)(\"feat-\"+t,[],void 0,void 0,r),u[t]=Boolean(n))})),Object.keys(s).forEach((e=>{void 0===u[e]&&(s[e]?.forEach((t=>(0,i.p)(\"rumresp-\"+e,[!1],void 0,t,r))),u[e]=!1)})),(0,o.L)(t,a.D.pageViewEvent))}const u={}},2210:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{X:()=>i});var n=Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty;function i(e,t,r){if(n.call(e,t))return e[t];var i=r();if(Object.defineProperty&&Object.keys)try{return Object.defineProperty(e,t,{value:i,writable:!0,enumerable:!1}),i}catch(e){}return e[t]=i,i}},1284:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{D:()=>n});const n=(e,t)=>Object.entries(e||{}).map((e=>{let[r,n]=e;return t(r,n)}))},4351:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{P:()=>o});var n=r(2177);const i=()=>{const e=new WeakSet;return(t,r)=>{if(\"object\"==typeof r&&null!==r){if(e.has(r))return;e.add(r)}return r}};function o(e){try{return JSON.stringify(e,i())}catch(e){try{n.ee.emit(\"internal-error\",[e])}catch(e){}}}},3960:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{K:()=>a,b:()=>o});var n=r(3239);function i(){return\"undefined\"==typeof document||\"complete\"===document.readyState}function o(e,t){if(i())return e();(0,n.bP)(\"load\",e,t)}function a(e){if(i())return e();(0,n.iz)(\"DOMContentLoaded\",e)}},8632:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{EZ:()=>u,Qy:()=>c,ce:()=>o,fP:()=>a,gG:()=>d,mF:()=>s});var n=r(7894),i=r(385);const o={beacon:\"bam.nr-data.net\",errorBeacon:\"bam.nr-data.net\"};function a(){return i._A.NREUM||(i._A.NREUM={}),void 0===i._A.newrelic&&(i._A.newrelic=i._A.NREUM),i._A.NREUM}function s(){let e=a();return e.o||(e.o={ST:i._A.setTimeout,SI:i._A.setImmediate,CT:i._A.clearTimeout,XHR:i._A.XMLHttpRequest,REQ:i._A.Request,EV:i._A.Event,PR:i._A.Promise,MO:i._A.MutationObserver,FETCH:i._A.fetch}),e}function c(e,t,r){let i=a();const o=i.initializedAgents||{},s=o[e]||{};return Object.keys(s).length||(s.initializedAt={ms:(0,n.z)(),date:new Date}),i.initializedAgents={...o,[e]:{...s,[r]:t}},i}function u(e,t){a()[e]=t}function d(){return function(){let e=a();const t=e.info||{};e.info={beacon:o.beacon,errorBeacon:o.errorBeacon,...t}}(),function(){let e=a();const t=e.init||{};e.init={...t}}(),s(),function(){let e=a();const t=e.loader_config||{};e.loader_config={...t}}(),a()}},7956:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{N:()=>i});var n=r(3239);function i(e){let t=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1],r=arguments.length>2?arguments[2]:void 0,i=arguments.length>3?arguments[3]:void 0;return void(0,n.iz)(\"visibilitychange\",(function(){if(t)return void(\"hidden\"==document.visibilityState&&e());e(document.visibilityState)}),r,i)}},1214:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{em:()=>v,u5:()=>N,QU:()=>S,_L:()=>I,Gm:()=>L,Lg:()=>M,gy:()=>U,BV:()=>Q,Kf:()=>ee});var n=r(2177);const i=\"nr@original\";var o=Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty,a=!1;function s(e,t){return e||(e=n.ee),r.inPlace=function(e,t,n,i,o){n||(n=\"\");var a,s,c,u=\"-\"===n.charAt(0);for(c=0;c 2?n-2:0),o=2;o {r(A[T],e,w),r(E[T],e,w)})),r(l._A,\"fetch\",y),t.on(y+\"end\",(function(e,r){var n=this;if(r){var i=r.headers.get(\"content-length\");null!==i&&(n.rxSize=i),t.emit(y+\"done\",[null,r],n)}else t.emit(y+\"done\",[e],n)})),t}const O={},j=[\"pushState\",\"replaceState\"];function S(e){const t=function(e){return(e||n.ee).get(\"history\")}(e);return!l.il||O[t.debugId]++||(O[t.debugId]=1,s(t).inPlace(window.history,j,\"-\")),t}var P=r(3239);const C={},R=[\"appendChild\",\"insertBefore\",\"replaceChild\"];function I(e){const t=function(e){return(e||n.ee).get(\"jsonp\")}(e);if(!l.il||C[t.debugId])return t;C[t.debugId]=!0;var r=s(t),i=/[?&](?:callback|cb)=([^&#]+)/,o=/(.*)\\.([^.]+)/,a=/^(\\w+)(\\.|$)(.*)$/;function c(e,t){var r=e.match(a),n=r[1],i=r[3];return i?c(i,t[n]):t[n]}return r.inPlace(Node.prototype,R,\"dom-\"),t.on(\"dom-start\",(function(e){!function(e){if(!e||\"string\"!=typeof e.nodeName||\"script\"!==e.nodeName.toLowerCase())return;if(\"function\"!=typeof e.addEventListener)return;var n=(a=e.src,s=a.match(i),s?s[1]:null);var a,s;if(!n)return;var u=function(e){var t=e.match(o);if(t&&t.length>=3)return{key:t[2],parent:c(t[1],window)};return{key:e,parent:window}}(n);if(\"function\"!=typeof u.parent[u.key])return;var d={};function f(){t.emit(\"jsonp-end\",[],d),e.removeEventListener(\"load\",f,(0,P.m$)(!1)),e.removeEventListener(\"error\",l,(0,P.m$)(!1))}function l(){t.emit(\"jsonp-error\",[],d),t.emit(\"jsonp-end\",[],d),e.removeEventListener(\"load\",f,(0,P.m$)(!1)),e.removeEventListener(\"error\",l,(0,P.m$)(!1))}r.inPlace(u.parent,[u.key],\"cb-\",d),e.addEventListener(\"load\",f,(0,P.m$)(!1)),e.addEventListener(\"error\",l,(0,P.m$)(!1)),t.emit(\"new-jsonp\",[e.src],d)}(e[0])})),t}var k=r(5763);const H={};function L(e){const t=function(e){return(e||n.ee).get(\"mutation\")}(e);if(!l.il||H[t.debugId])return t;H[t.debugId]=!0;var r=s(t),i=k.Yu.MO;return i&&(window.MutationObserver=function(e){return this instanceof i?new i(r(e,\"fn-\")):i.apply(this,arguments)},MutationObserver.prototype=i.prototype),t}const z={};function M(e){const t=function(e){return(e||n.ee).get(\"promise\")}(e);if(z[t.debugId])return t;z[t.debugId]=!0;var r=n.c,o=s(t),a=k.Yu.PR;return a&&function(){function e(r){var n=t.context(),i=o(r,\"executor-\",n,null,!1);const s=Reflect.construct(a,[i],e);return t.context(s).getCtx=function(){return n},s}l._A.Promise=e,Object.defineProperty(e,\"name\",{value:\"Promise\"}),e.toString=function(){return a.toString()},Object.setPrototypeOf(e,a),[\"all\",\"race\"].forEach((function(r){const n=a[r];e[r]=function(e){let i=!1;[...e||[]].forEach((e=>{this.resolve(e).then(a(\"all\"===r),a(!1))}));const o=n.apply(this,arguments);return o;function a(e){return function(){t.emit(\"propagate\",[null,!i],o,!1,!1),i=i||!e}}}})),[\"resolve\",\"reject\"].forEach((function(r){const n=a[r];e[r]=function(e){const r=n.apply(this,arguments);return e!==r&&t.emit(\"propagate\",[e,!0],r,!1,!1),r}})),e.prototype=a.prototype;const n=a.prototype.then;a.prototype.then=function(){var e=this,i=r(e);i.promise=e;for(var a=arguments.length,s=new Array(a),c=0;c e())),t};function m(e,t){i.inPlace(t,[\"onreadystatechange\"],\"fn-\",E)}function b(){var e=this,t=r.context(e);e.readyState>3&&!t.resolved&&(t.resolved=!0,r.emit(\"xhr-resolved\",[],e)),i.inPlace(e,f,\"fn-\",E)}if(function(e,t){for(var r in e)t[r]=e[r]}(o,p),p.prototype=o.prototype,i.inPlace(p.prototype,J,\"-xhr-\",E),r.on(\"send-xhr-start\",(function(e,t){m(e,t),function(e){h.push(e),a&&(y?y.then(A):u?u(A):(w=-w,x.data=w))}(t)})),r.on(\"open-xhr-start\",m),a){var y=c&&c.resolve();if(!u&&!c){var w=1,x=document.createTextNode(w);new a(A).observe(x,{characterData:!0})}}else t.on(\"fn-end\",(function(e){e[0]&&e[0].type===d||A()}));function A(){for(var e=0;e {r.d(t,{t:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.ajax},6660:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{A:()=>i,t:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.jserrors,i=\"nr@seenError\"},3081:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{gF:()=>o,mY:()=>i,t9:()=>n,vz:()=>s,xS:()=>a});const n=r(3325).D.metrics,i=\"sm\",o=\"cm\",a=\"storeSupportabilityMetrics\",s=\"storeEventMetrics\"},4649:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{t:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.pageAction},7633:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{Dz:()=>i,OJ:()=>a,qw:()=>o,t9:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.pageViewEvent,i=\"firstbyte\",o=\"domcontent\",a=\"windowload\"},9251:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{t:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.pageViewTiming},3614:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{BST_RESOURCE:()=>i,END:()=>s,FEATURE_NAME:()=>n,FN_END:()=>u,FN_START:()=>c,PUSH_STATE:()=>d,RESOURCE:()=>o,START:()=>a});const n=r(3325).D.sessionTrace,i=\"bstResource\",o=\"resource\",a=\"-start\",s=\"-end\",c=\"fn\"+a,u=\"fn\"+s,d=\"pushState\"},7836:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{BODY:()=>A,CB_END:()=>E,CB_START:()=>u,END:()=>x,FEATURE_NAME:()=>i,FETCH:()=>_,FETCH_BODY:()=>v,FETCH_DONE:()=>m,FETCH_START:()=>p,FN_END:()=>c,FN_START:()=>s,INTERACTION:()=>l,INTERACTION_API:()=>d,INTERACTION_EVENTS:()=>o,JSONP_END:()=>b,JSONP_NODE:()=>g,JS_TIME:()=>T,MAX_TIMER_BUDGET:()=>a,REMAINING:()=>f,SPA_NODE:()=>h,START:()=>w,originalSetTimeout:()=>y});var n=r(5763);const i=r(3325).D.spa,o=[\"click\",\"submit\",\"keypress\",\"keydown\",\"keyup\",\"change\"],a=999,s=\"fn-start\",c=\"fn-end\",u=\"cb-start\",d=\"api-ixn-\",f=\"remaining\",l=\"interaction\",h=\"spaNode\",g=\"jsonpNode\",p=\"fetch-start\",m=\"fetch-done\",v=\"fetch-body-\",b=\"jsonp-end\",y=n.Yu.ST,w=\"-start\",x=\"-end\",A=\"-body\",E=\"cb\"+x,T=\"jsTime\",_=\"fetch\"},5938:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{W:()=>o});var n=r(5763),i=r(2177);class o{constructor(e,t,r){this.agentIdentifier=e,this.aggregator=t,this.ee=i.ee.get(e,(0,n.OP)(this.agentIdentifier).isolatedBacklog),this.featureName=r,this.blocked=!1}}},9144:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{j:()=>m});var n=r(3325),i=r(5763),o=r(5546),a=r(2177),s=r(7894),c=r(8e3),u=r(3960),d=r(385),f=r(50),l=r(3081),h=r(8632);function g(){const e=(0,h.gG)();[\"setErrorHandler\",\"finished\",\"addToTrace\",\"inlineHit\",\"addRelease\",\"addPageAction\",\"setCurrentRouteName\",\"setPageViewName\",\"setCustomAttribute\",\"interaction\",\"noticeError\",\"setUserId\"].forEach((t=>{e[t]=function(){for(var r=arguments.length,n=new Array(r),i=0;i 1?r-1:0),i=1;i {e.exposed&&e.api[t]&&o.push(e.api[t](...n))})),o.length>1?o:o[0]}(t,...n)}}))}var p=r(2587);function m(e){let t=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]?arguments[1]:{},m=arguments.length>2?arguments[2]:void 0,v=arguments.length>3?arguments[3]:void 0,{init:b,info:y,loader_config:w,runtime:x={loaderType:m},exposed:A=!0}=t;const E=(0,h.gG)();y||(b=E.init,y=E.info,w=E.loader_config),(0,i.Dg)(e,b||{}),(0,i.GE)(e,w||{}),(0,i.sU)(e,x),y.jsAttributes??={},d.v6&&(y.jsAttributes.isWorker=!0),(0,i.CX)(e,y),g();const T=function(e,t){t||(0,c.R)(e,\"api\");const h={};var g=a.ee.get(e),p=g.get(\"tracer\"),m=\"api-\",v=m+\"ixn-\";function b(t,r,n,o){const a=(0,i.C5)(e);return null===r?delete a.jsAttributes[t]:(0,i.CX)(e,{...a,jsAttributes:{...a.jsAttributes,[t]:r}}),x(m,n,!0,o||null===r?\"session\":void 0)(t,r)}function y(){}[\"setErrorHandler\",\"finished\",\"addToTrace\",\"inlineHit\",\"addRelease\"].forEach((e=>h[e]=x(m,e,!0,\"api\"))),h.addPageAction=x(m,\"addPageAction\",!0,n.D.pageAction),h.setCurrentRouteName=x(m,\"routeName\",!0,n.D.spa),h.setPageViewName=function(t,r){if(\"string\"==typeof t)return\"/\"!==t.charAt(0)&&(t=\"/\"+t),(0,i.OP)(e).customTransaction=(r||\"http://custom.transaction\")+t,x(m,\"setPageViewName\",!0)()},h.setCustomAttribute=function(e,t){let r=arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2]&&arguments[2];if(\"string\"==typeof e){if([\"string\",\"number\"].includes(typeof t)||null===t)return b(e,t,\"setCustomAttribute\",r);(0,f.Z)(\"Failed to execute setCustomAttribute.\\nNon-null value must be a string or number type, but a type of was provided.\"))}else(0,f.Z)(\"Failed to execute setCustomAttribute.\\nName must be a string type, but a type of was provided.\"))},h.setUserId=function(e){if(\"string\"==typeof e||null===e)return b(\"enduser.id\",e,\"setUserId\",!0);(0,f.Z)(\"Failed to execute setUserId.\\nNon-null value must be a string type, but a type of was provided.\"))},h.interaction=function(){return(new y).get()};var w=y.prototype={createTracer:function(e,t){var r={},i=this,a=\"function\"==typeof t;return(0,o.p)(v+\"tracer\",[(0,s.z)(),e,r],i,n.D.spa,g),function(){if(p.emit((a?\"\":\"no-\")+\"fn-start\",[(0,s.z)(),i,a],r),a)try{return t.apply(this,arguments)}catch(e){throw p.emit(\"fn-err\",[arguments,this,\"string\"==typeof e?new Error(e):e],r),e}finally{p.emit(\"fn-end\",[(0,s.z)()],r)}}}};function x(e,t,r,i){return function(){return(0,o.p)(l.xS,[\"API/\"+t+\"/called\"],void 0,n.D.metrics,g),i&&(0,o.p)(e+t,[(0,s.z)(),...arguments],r?null:this,i,g),r?void 0:this}}function A(){r.e(439).then(r.bind(r,7438)).then((t=>{let{setAPI:r}=t;r(e),(0,c.L)(e,\"api\")})).catch((()=>(0,f.Z)(\"Downloading runtime APIs failed...\")))}return[\"actionText\",\"setName\",\"setAttribute\",\"save\",\"ignore\",\"onEnd\",\"getContext\",\"end\",\"get\"].forEach((e=>{w[e]=x(v,e,void 0,n.D.spa)})),h.noticeError=function(e,t){\"string\"==typeof e&&(e=new Error(e)),(0,o.p)(l.xS,[\"API/noticeError/called\"],void 0,n.D.metrics,g),(0,o.p)(\"err\",[e,(0,s.z)(),!1,t],void 0,n.D.jserrors,g)},d.il?(0,u.b)((()=>A()),!0):A(),h}(e,v);return(0,h.Qy)(e,T,\"api\"),(0,h.Qy)(e,A,\"exposed\"),(0,h.EZ)(\"activatedFeatures\",p.T),T}},3325:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{D:()=>n,p:()=>i});const n={ajax:\"ajax\",jserrors:\"jserrors\",metrics:\"metrics\",pageAction:\"page_action\",pageViewEvent:\"page_view_event\",pageViewTiming:\"page_view_timing\",sessionReplay:\"session_replay\",sessionTrace:\"session_trace\",spa:\"spa\"},i={[n.pageViewEvent]:1,[n.pageViewTiming]:2,[n.metrics]:3,[n.jserrors]:4,[n.ajax]:5,[n.sessionTrace]:6,[n.pageAction]:7,[n.spa]:8,[n.sessionReplay]:9}}},n={};function i(e){var t=n[e];if(void 0!==t)return t.exports;var o=n[e]={exports:{}};return r[e](o,o.exports,i),o.exports}i.m=r,i.d=(e,t)=>{for(var r in t)i.o(t,r)&&!i.o(e,r)&&Object.defineProperty(e,r,{enumerable:!0,get:t[r]})},i.f={},i.e=e=>Promise.all(Object.keys(i.f).reduce(((t,r)=>(i.f[r](e,t),t)),[])),i.u=e=>(({78:\"page_action-aggregate\",147:\"metrics-aggregate\",242:\"session-manager\",317:\"jserrors-aggregate\",348:\"page_view_timing-aggregate\",412:\"lazy-feature-loader\",439:\"async-api\",538:\"recorder\",590:\"session_replay-aggregate\",675:\"compressor\",733:\"session_trace-aggregate\",786:\"page_view_event-aggregate\",873:\"spa-aggregate\",898:\"ajax-aggregate\"}[e]||e)+\".\"+{78:\"ac76d497\",147:\"3dc53903\",148:\"1a20d5fe\",242:\"2a64278a\",317:\"49e41428\",348:\"bd6de33a\",412:\"2f55ce66\",439:\"30bd804e\",538:\"1b18459f\",590:\"cf0efb30\",675:\"ae9f91a8\",733:\"83105561\",786:\"06482edd\",860:\"03a8b7a5\",873:\"e6b09d52\",898:\"998ef92b\"}[e]+\"-1.236.0.min.js\"),i.o=(e,t)=>Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(e,t),e={},t=\"NRBA:\",i.l=(r,n,o,a)=>{if(e[r])e[r].push(n);else{var s,c;if(void 0!==o)for(var u=document.getElementsByTagName(\"script\"),d=0;d {s.onerror=s.onload=null,clearTimeout(h);var i=e[r];if(delete e[r],s.parentNode&&s.parentNode.removeChild(s),i&&i.forEach((e=>e(n))),t)return t(n)},h=setTimeout(l.bind(null,void 0,{type:\"timeout\",target:s}),12e4);s.onerror=l.bind(null,s.onerror),s.onload=l.bind(null,s.onload),c&&document.head.appendChild(s)}},i.r=e=>{\"undefined\"!=typeof Symbol&&Symbol.toStringTag&&Object.defineProperty(e,Symbol.toStringTag,{value:\"Module\"}),Object.defineProperty(e,\"__esModule\",{value:!0})},i.j=364,i.p=\"https://js-agent.newrelic.com/\",(()=>{var e={364:0,953:0};i.f.j=(t,r)=>{var n=i.o(e,t)?e[t]:void 0;if(0!==n)if(n)r.push(n[2]);else{var o=new Promise(((r,i)=>n=e[t]=[r,i]));r.push(n[2]=o);var a=i.p+i.u(t),s=new Error;i.l(a,(r=>{if(i.o(e,t)&&(0!==(n=e[t])&&(e[t]=void 0),n)){var o=r&&(\"load\"===r.type?\"missing\":r.type),a=r&&r.target&&r.target.src;s.message=\"Loading chunk \"+t+\" failed.\\n(\"+o+\": \"+a+\")\",s.name=\"ChunkLoadError\",s.type=o,s.request=a,n[1](s)}}),\"chunk-\"+t,t)}};var t=(t,r)=>{var n,o,[a,s,c]=r,u=0;if(a.some((t=>0!==e[t]))){for(n in s)i.o(s,n)&&(i.m[n]=s[n]);if(c)c(i)}for(t&&t(r);u {i.r(o);var e=i(3325),t=i(5763);const r=Object.values(e.D);function n(e){const n={};return r.forEach((r=>{n[r]=function(e,r){return!1!==(0,t.Mt)(r,\"\".concat(e,\".enabled\"))}(r,e)})),n}var a=i(9144);var s=i(5546),c=i(385),u=i(8e3),d=i(5938),f=i(3960),l=i(50);class h extends d.W{constructor(e,t,r){let n=!(arguments.length>3&&void 0!==arguments[3])||arguments[3];super(e,t,r),this.auto=n,this.abortHandler,this.featAggregate,this.onAggregateImported,n&&(0,u.R)(e,r)}importAggregator(){let e=arguments.length>0&&void 0!==arguments[0]?arguments[0]:{};if(this.featAggregate||!this.auto)return;const r=c.il&&!0===(0,t.Mt)(this.agentIdentifier,\"privacy.cookies_enabled\");let n;this.onAggregateImported=new Promise((e=>{n=e}));const o=async()=>{let t;try{if(r){const{setupAgentSession:e}=await Promise.all([i.e(860),i.e(242)]).then(i.bind(i,3228));t=e(this.agentIdentifier)}}catch(e){(0,l.Z)(\"A problem occurred when starting up session manager. This page will not start or extend any session.\",e)}try{if(!this.shouldImportAgg(this.featureName,t))return void(0,u.L)(this.agentIdentifier,this.featureName);const{lazyFeatureLoader:r}=await i.e(412).then(i.bind(i,8582)),{Aggregate:o}=await r(this.featureName,\"aggregate\");this.featAggregate=new o(this.agentIdentifier,this.aggregator,e),n(!0)}catch(e){(0,l.Z)(\"Downloading and initializing \".concat(this.featureName,\" failed...\"),e),this.abortHandler?.(),n(!1)}};c.il?(0,f.b)((()=>o()),!0):o()}shouldImportAgg(r,n){return r!==e.D.sessionReplay||!1!==(0,t.Mt)(this.agentIdentifier,\"session_trace.enabled\")&&(!!n?.isNew||!!n?.state.sessionReplay)}}var g=i(7633),p=i(7894);class m extends h{static featureName=g.t9;constructor(r,n){let i=!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];if(super(r,n,g.t9,i),(\"undefined\"==typeof PerformanceNavigationTiming||c.Tt)&&\"undefined\"!=typeof PerformanceTiming){const n=(0,t.OP)(r);n[g.Dz]=Math.max(Date.now()-n.offset,0),(0,f.K)((()=>n[g.qw]=Math.max((0,p.z)()-n[g.Dz],0))),(0,f.b)((()=>{const t=(0,p.z)();n[g.OJ]=Math.max(t-n[g.Dz],0),(0,s.p)(\"timing\",[\"load\",t],void 0,e.D.pageViewTiming,this.ee)}))}this.importAggregator()}}var v=i(1117),b=i(1284);class y extends v.w{constructor(e){super(e),this.aggregatedData={}}store(e,t,r,n,i){var o=this.getBucket(e,t,r,i);return o.metrics=function(e,t){t||(t={count:0});return t.count+=1,(0,b.D)(e,(function(e,r){t[e]=w(r,t[e])})),t}(n,o.metrics),o}merge(e,t,r,n,i){var o=this.getBucket(e,t,n,i);if(o.metrics){var a=o.metrics;a.count+=r.count,(0,b.D)(r,(function(e,t){if(\"count\"!==e){var n=a[e],i=r[e];i&&!i.c?a[e]=w(i.t,n):a[e]=function(e,t){if(!t)return e;t.c||(t=x(t.t));return t.min=Math.min(e.min,t.min),t.max=Math.max(e.max,t.max),t.t+=e.t,t.sos+=e.sos,t.c+=e.c,t}(i,a[e])}}))}else o.metrics=r}storeMetric(e,t,r,n){var i=this.getBucket(e,t,r);return i.stats=w(n,i.stats),i}getBucket(e,t,r,n){this.aggregatedData[e]||(this.aggregatedData[e]={});var i=this.aggregatedData[e][t];return i||(i=this.aggregatedData[e][t]={params:r||{}},n&&(i.custom=n)),i}get(e,t){return t?this.aggregatedData[e]&&this.aggregatedData[e][t]:this.aggregatedData[e]}take(e){for(var t={},r=\"\",n=!1,i=0;i t.max&&(t.max=e),e 2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(e,r,j.t,n),c.il&&((0,t.OP)(e).initHidden=Boolean(\"hidden\"===document.visibilityState),(0,N.N)((()=>(0,s.p)(\"docHidden\",[(0,p.z)()],void 0,j.t,this.ee)),!0),(0,O.bP)(\"pagehide\",(()=>(0,s.p)(\"winPagehide\",[(0,p.z)()],void 0,j.t,this.ee))),this.importAggregator())}}var P=i(3081);class C extends h{static featureName=P.t9;constructor(e,t){let r=!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(e,t,P.t9,r),this.importAggregator()}}var R,I=i(2210),k=i(1214),H=i(2177),L={};try{R=localStorage.getItem(\"__nr_flags\").split(\",\"),console&&\"function\"==typeof console.log&&(L.console=!0,-1!==R.indexOf(\"dev\")&&(L.dev=!0),-1!==R.indexOf(\"nr_dev\")&&(L.nrDev=!0))}catch(e){}function z(e){try{L.console&&z(e)}catch(e){}}L.nrDev&&H.ee.on(\"internal-error\",(function(e){z(e.stack)})),L.dev&&H.ee.on(\"fn-err\",(function(e,t,r){z(r.stack)})),L.dev&&(z(\"NR AGENT IN DEVELOPMENT MODE\"),z(\"flags: \"+(0,b.D)(L,(function(e,t){return e})).join(\", \")));var M=i(6660);class B extends h{static featureName=M.t;constructor(r,n){let i=!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(r,n,M.t,i),this.skipNext=0;try{this.removeOnAbort=new AbortController}catch(e){}const o=this;o.ee.on(\"fn-start\",(function(e,t,r){o.abortHandler&&(o.skipNext+=1)})),o.ee.on(\"fn-err\",(function(t,r,n){o.abortHandler&&!n[M.A]&&((0,I.X)(n,M.A,(function(){return!0})),this.thrown=!0,(0,s.p)(\"err\",[n,(0,p.z)()],void 0,e.D.jserrors,o.ee))})),o.ee.on(\"fn-end\",(function(){o.abortHandler&&!this.thrown&&o.skipNext>0&&(o.skipNext-=1)})),o.ee.on(\"internal-error\",(function(t){(0,s.p)(\"ierr\",[t,(0,p.z)(),!0],void 0,e.D.jserrors,o.ee)})),this.origOnerror=c._A.onerror,c._A.onerror=this.onerrorHandler.bind(this),c._A.addEventListener(\"unhandledrejection\",(t=>{const r=function(e){let t=\"Unhandled Promise Rejection: \";if(e instanceof Error)try{return e.message=t+e.message,e}catch(t){return e}if(void 0===e)return new Error(t);try{return new Error(t+(0,D.P)(e))}catch(e){return new Error(t)}}(t.reason);(0,s.p)(\"err\",[r,(0,p.z)(),!1,{unhandledPromiseRejection:1}],void 0,e.D.jserrors,this.ee)}),(0,O.m$)(!1,this.removeOnAbort?.signal)),(0,k.gy)(this.ee),(0,k.BV)(this.ee),(0,k.em)(this.ee),(0,t.OP)(r).xhrWrappable&&(0,k.Kf)(this.ee),this.abortHandler=this.#e,this.importAggregator()}#e(){this.removeOnAbort?.abort(),this.abortHandler=void 0}onerrorHandler(t,r,n,i,o){\"function\"==typeof this.origOnerror&&this.origOnerror(...arguments);try{this.skipNext?this.skipNext-=1:(0,s.p)(\"err\",[o||new F(t,r,n),(0,p.z)()],void 0,e.D.jserrors,this.ee)}catch(t){try{(0,s.p)(\"ierr\",[t,(0,p.z)(),!0],void 0,e.D.jserrors,this.ee)}catch(e){}}return!1}}function F(e,t,r){this.message=e||\"Uncaught error with no additional information\",this.sourceURL=t,this.line=r}let U=1;const q=\"nr@id\";function G(e){const t=typeof e;return!e||\"object\"!==t&&\"function\"!==t?-1:e===c._A?0:(0,I.X)(e,q,(function(){return U++}))}function V(e){if(\"string\"==typeof e&&e.length)return e.length;if(\"object\"==typeof e){if(\"undefined\"!=typeof ArrayBuffer&&e instanceof ArrayBuffer&&e.byteLength)return e.byteLength;if(\"undefined\"!=typeof Blob&&e instanceof Blob&&e.size)return e.size;if(!(\"undefined\"!=typeof FormData&&e instanceof FormData))try{return(0,D.P)(e).length}catch(e){return}}}var X=i(7243);class W{constructor(e){this.agentIdentifier=e,this.generateTracePayload=this.generateTracePayload.bind(this),this.shouldGenerateTrace=this.shouldGenerateTrace.bind(this)}generateTracePayload(e){if(!this.shouldGenerateTrace(e))return null;var r=(0,t.DL)(this.agentIdentifier);if(!r)return null;var n=(r.accountID||\"\").toString()||null,i=(r.agentID||\"\").toString()||null,o=(r.trustKey||\"\").toString()||null;if(!n||!i)return null;var a=(0,_.M)(),s=(0,_.Ht)(),c=Date.now(),u={spanId:a,traceId:s,timestamp:c};return(e.sameOrigin||this.isAllowedOrigin(e)&&this.useTraceContextHeadersForCors())&&(u.traceContextParentHeader=this.generateTraceContextParentHeader(a,s),u.traceContextStateHeader=this.generateTraceContextStateHeader(a,c,n,i,o)),(e.sameOrigin&&!this.excludeNewrelicHeader()||!e.sameOrigin&&this.isAllowedOrigin(e)&&this.useNewrelicHeaderForCors())&&(u.newrelicHeader=this.generateTraceHeader(a,s,c,n,i,o)),u}generateTraceContextParentHeader(e,t){return\"00-\"+t+\"-\"+e+\"-01\"}generateTraceContextStateHeader(e,t,r,n,i){return i+\"@nr=0-1-\"+r+\"-\"+n+\"-\"+e+\"----\"+t}generateTraceHeader(e,t,r,n,i,o){if(!(\"function\"==typeof c._A?.btoa))return null;var a={v:[0,1],d:{ty:\"Browser\",ac:n,ap:i,id:e,tr:t,ti:r}};return o&&n!==o&&(a.d.tk=o),btoa((0,D.P)(a))}shouldGenerateTrace(e){return this.isDtEnabled()&&this.isAllowedOrigin(e)}isAllowedOrigin(e){var r=!1,n={};if((0,t.Mt)(this.agentIdentifier,\"distributed_tracing\")&&(n=(0,t.P_)(this.agentIdentifier).distributed_tracing),e.sameOrigin)r=!0;else if(n.allowed_origins instanceof Array)for(var i=0;i 2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(r,n,Z.t,i),(0,t.OP)(r).xhrWrappable&&(this.dt=new W(r),this.handler=(e,t,r,n)=>(0,s.p)(e,t,r,n,this.ee),(0,k.u5)(this.ee),(0,k.Kf)(this.ee),function(r,n,i,o){function a(e){var t=this;t.totalCbs=0,t.called=0,t.cbTime=0,t.end=E,t.ended=!1,t.xhrGuids={},t.lastSize=null,t.loadCaptureCalled=!1,t.params=this.params||{},t.metrics=this.metrics||{},e.addEventListener(\"load\",(function(r){_(t,e)}),(0,O.m$)(!1)),c.IF||e.addEventListener(\"progress\",(function(e){t.lastSize=e.loaded}),(0,O.m$)(!1))}function s(e){this.params={method:e[0]},T(this,e[1]),this.metrics={}}function u(e,n){var i=(0,t.DL)(r);i.xpid&&this.sameOrigin&&n.setRequestHeader(\"X-NewRelic-ID\",i.xpid);var a=o.generateTracePayload(this.parsedOrigin);if(a){var s=!1;a.newrelicHeader&&(n.setRequestHeader(\"newrelic\",a.newrelicHeader),s=!0),a.traceContextParentHeader&&(n.setRequestHeader(\"traceparent\",a.traceContextParentHeader),a.traceContextStateHeader&&n.setRequestHeader(\"tracestate\",a.traceContextStateHeader),s=!0),s&&(this.dt=a)}}function d(e,t){var r=this.metrics,i=e[0],o=this;if(r&&i){var a=V(i);a&&(r.txSize=a)}this.startTime=(0,p.z)(),this.listener=function(e){try{\"abort\"!==e.type||o.loadCaptureCalled||(o.params.aborted=!0),(\"load\"!==e.type||o.called===o.totalCbs&&(o.onloadCalled||\"function\"!=typeof t.onload)&&\"function\"==typeof o.end)&&o.end(t)}catch(e){try{n.emit(\"internal-error\",[e])}catch(e){}}};for(var s=0;s 1?e[1]=i:e.push(i)}else e[0]&&e[0].headers&&s(e[0].headers,n)&&(this.dt=n);function s(e,t){var r=!1;return t.newrelicHeader&&(e.set(\"newrelic\",t.newrelicHeader),r=!0),t.traceContextParentHeader&&(e.set(\"traceparent\",t.traceContextParentHeader),t.traceContextStateHeader&&e.set(\"tracestate\",t.traceContextStateHeader),r=!0),r}}function x(e,t){this.params={},this.metrics={},this.startTime=(0,p.z)(),this.dt=t,e.length>=1&&(this.target=e[0]),e.length>=2&&(this.opts=e[1]);var r,n=this.opts||{},i=this.target;\"string\"==typeof i?r=i:\"object\"==typeof i&&i instanceof Y?r=i.url:c._A?.URL&&\"object\"==typeof i&&i instanceof URL&&(r=i.href),T(this,r);var o=(\"\"+(i&&i instanceof Y&&i.method||n.method||\"GET\")).toUpperCase();this.params.method=o,this.txSize=V(n.body)||0}function A(t,r){var n;this.endTime=(0,p.z)(),this.params||(this.params={}),this.params.status=r?r.status:0,\"string\"==typeof this.rxSize&&this.rxSize.length>0&&(n=+this.rxSize);var o={txSize:this.txSize,rxSize:n,duration:(0,p.z)()-this.startTime};i(\"xhr\",[this.params,o,this.startTime,this.endTime,\"fetch\"],this,e.D.ajax)}function E(t){var r=this.params,n=this.metrics;if(!this.ended){this.ended=!0;for(var o=0;o 2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(e,t,we.t,r),this.importAggregator()}}new class{constructor(e){let t=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]?arguments[1]:(0,_.ky)(16);c._A?(this.agentIdentifier=t,this.sharedAggregator=new y({agentIdentifier:this.agentIdentifier}),this.features={},this.desiredFeatures=new Set(e.features||[]),this.desiredFeatures.add(m),Object.assign(this,(0,a.j)(this.agentIdentifier,e,e.loaderType||\"agent\")),this.start()):(0,l.Z)(\"Failed to initial the agent. Could not determine the runtime environment.\")}get config(){return{info:(0,t.C5)(this.agentIdentifier),init:(0,t.P_)(this.agentIdentifier),loader_config:(0,t.DL)(this.agentIdentifier),runtime:(0,t.OP)(this.agentIdentifier)}}start(){const t=\"features\";try{const r=n(this.agentIdentifier),i=[...this.desiredFeatures];i.sort(((t,r)=>e.p[t.featureName]-e.p[r.featureName])),i.forEach((t=>{if(r[t.featureName]||t.featureName===e.D.pageViewEvent){const n=function(t){switch(t){case e.D.ajax:return[e.D.jserrors];case e.D.sessionTrace:return[e.D.ajax,e.D.pageViewEvent];case e.D.sessionReplay:return[e.D.sessionTrace];case e.D.pageViewTiming:return[e.D.pageViewEvent];default:return[]}}(t.featureName);n.every((e=>r[e]))||(0,l.Z)(\"\".concat(t.featureName,\" is enabled but one or more dependent features has been disabled (\").concat((0,D.P)(n),\"). This may cause unintended consequences or missing data...\")),this.features[t.featureName]=new t(this.agentIdentifier,this.sharedAggregator)}})),(0,T.Qy)(this.agentIdentifier,this.features,t)}catch(e){(0,l.Z)(\"Failed to initialize all enabled instrument classes (agent aborted) -\",e);for(const e in this.features)this.features[e].abortHandler?.();const r=(0,T.fP)();return delete r.initializedAgents[this.agentIdentifier]?.api,delete r.initializedAgents[this.agentIdentifier]?.[t],delete this.sharedAggregator,r.ee?.abort(),delete r.ee?.get(this.agentIdentifier),!1}}}({features:[J,m,S,class extends h{static featureName=oe;constructor(t,r){if(super(t,r,oe,!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2]),!c.il)return;const n=this.ee;let i;(0,k.QU)(n),this.eventsEE=(0,k.em)(n),this.eventsEE.on(se,(function(e,t){this.bstStart=(0,p.z)()})),this.eventsEE.on(ae,(function(t,r){(0,s.p)(\"bst\",[t[0],r,this.bstStart,(0,p.z)()],void 0,e.D.sessionTrace,n)})),n.on(ce+ne,(function(e){this.time=(0,p.z)(),this.startPath=location.pathname+location.hash})),n.on(ce+ie,(function(t){(0,s.p)(\"bstHist\",[location.pathname+location.hash,this.startPath,this.time],void 0,e.D.sessionTrace,n)}));try{i=new PerformanceObserver((t=>{const r=t.getEntries();(0,s.p)(te,[r],void 0,e.D.sessionTrace,n)})),i.observe({type:re,buffered:!0})}catch(e){}this.importAggregator({resourceObserver:i})}},C,xe,B,class extends h{static featureName=de;constructor(e,r){if(super(e,r,de,!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2]),!c.il)return;if(!(0,t.OP)(e).xhrWrappable)return;try{this.removeOnAbort=new AbortController}catch(e){}let n,i=0;const o=this.ee.get(\"tracer\"),a=(0,k._L)(this.ee),s=(0,k.Lg)(this.ee),u=(0,k.BV)(this.ee),d=(0,k.Kf)(this.ee),f=this.ee.get(\"events\"),l=(0,k.u5)(this.ee),h=(0,k.QU)(this.ee),g=(0,k.Gm)(this.ee);function m(e,t){h.emit(\"newURL\",[\"\"+window.location,t])}function v(){i++,n=window.location.hash,this[ve]=(0,p.z)()}function b(){i--,window.location.hash!==n&&m(0,!0);var e=(0,p.z)();this[pe]=~~this[pe]+e-this[ve],this[ye]=e}function y(e,t){e.on(t,(function(){this[t]=(0,p.z)()}))}this.ee.on(ve,v),s.on(be,v),a.on(be,v),this.ee.on(ye,b),s.on(ge,b),a.on(ge,b),this.ee.buffer([ve,ye,\"xhr-resolved\"],this.featureName),f.buffer([ve],this.featureName),u.buffer([\"setTimeout\"+le,\"clearTimeout\"+fe,ve],this.featureName),d.buffer([ve,\"new-xhr\",\"send-xhr\"+fe],this.featureName),l.buffer([me+fe,me+\"-done\",me+he+fe,me+he+le],this.featureName),h.buffer([\"newURL\"],this.featureName),g.buffer([ve],this.featureName),s.buffer([\"propagate\",be,ge,\"executor-err\",\"resolve\"+fe],this.featureName),o.buffer([ve,\"no-\"+ve],this.featureName),a.buffer([\"new-jsonp\",\"cb-start\",\"jsonp-error\",\"jsonp-end\"],this.featureName),y(l,me+fe),y(l,me+\"-done\"),y(a,\"new-jsonp\"),y(a,\"jsonp-end\"),y(a,\"cb-start\"),h.on(\"pushState-end\",m),h.on(\"replaceState-end\",m),window.addEventListener(\"hashchange\",m,(0,O.m$)(!0,this.removeOnAbort?.signal)),window.addEventListener(\"load\",m,(0,O.m$)(!0,this.removeOnAbort?.signal)),window.addEventListener(\"popstate\",(function(){m(0,i>1)}),(0,O.m$)(!0,this.removeOnAbort?.signal)),this.abortHandler=this.#e,this.importAggregator()}#e(){this.removeOnAbort?.abort(),this.abortHandler=void 0}}],loaderType:\"spa\"})})(),window.NRBA=o})(); window.jQuery || document.write(' ') CKEDITOR_BASEPATH='https://f1000research.com/js/vendor/ckeditor/' window.reactTheme = 'research'; window.MathJax = { CommonHTML: { linebreaks: { automatic: true } }, 'HTML-CSS': { linebreaks: { automatic: true } }, SVG: { linebreaks: { automatic: true } }, AuthorInit: function() { MathJax.Hub.Register.MessageHook('End Process', function () { let timeout = false; // holder for timeout id const delay = 250; // delay after event is \"complete\" to run callback const reflowMath = function() { const dispFormulas = document.querySelectorAll('.disp-formula.panel'); if (!dispFormulas) { return; } for (const dispFormula of dispFormulas) { const child = dispFormula.querySelector('.MathJax_Preview').nextSibling.firstChild; const isMultiline = MathJax.Hub.getAllJax(dispFormula)[0].root.isMultiline; if (dispFormula.offsetWidth < child.offsetWidth || isMultiline) { MathJax.Hub.Queue(['Rerender', MathJax.Hub, dispFormula]); } } }; window.addEventListener('resize', function() { clearTimeout(timeout); // clear the timeout timeout = setTimeout(reflowMath, delay); // start timing for event \"completion\" }); }); }, }; if (window.location.hash == '#_=_'){ window.location = window.location.href.split('#')[0] } !function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s){if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function() {n.callMethod? n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)} ;if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n; n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version='2.0';n.queue=[];t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0; t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0];s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window, document,'script','https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js'); fbq('init', '1641728616063202'); fbq('track', \"PixelInitialized\", {}); (function(h,o,t,j,a,r){ h.hj=h.hj||function(){(h.hj.q=h.hj.q||[]).push(arguments)}; h._hjSettings={hjid:2318163,hjsv:6}; a=o.getElementsByTagName('head')[0]; r=o.createElement('script');r.async=1; r.src=t+h._hjSettings.hjid+j+h._hjSettings.hjsv; a.appendChild(r); })(window,document,'https://static.hotjar.com/c/hotjar-','.js?sv='); search file_upload Submit your research search menu close search Browse Gateways & Collections How to Publish Submit your Research My Submissions Article Guidelines Article Guidelines (New Versions) Open Data, Software and Code Guidelines Open Data and Accessible Source Materials Guidelines (HSS) Open Data, Software and Code Guidelines (PSE) Prepublication Checks Production Process Posters and Slides Guidelines Document Guidelines Article Processing Charges Peer Review Finding Article Reviewers About How it Works For Reviewers Our Advisors Policies Glossary FAQs For Developers Newsroom Contact My Research Submissions Content and Tracking Alerts My Details Sign In file_upload Submit your research { \"@context\": \"https://schema.org\", \"@type\": \"ScholarlyArticle\", \"mainEntityOfPage\": { \"@type\": \"WebPage\", \"@id\": \"https://f1000research.com/articles/14-101\" }, \"headline\": \"Measuring life satisfaction of self-help groups: Role of perceived social support and social empowerment\", \"datePublished\": \"2025-01-17T16:22:51\", \"dateModified\": \"2025-03-06T09:27:37\", \"author\": [ { \"@type\": \"Person\", \"name\": \"Suraksha Suvarna\" }, { \"@type\": \"Person\", \"name\": \"Satish Kumar\" }, { \"@type\": \"Person\", \"name\": \"Navin Kumar Koodamara\" } ], \"publisher\": { \"@type\": \"Organization\", \"name\": \"F1000Research\", \"logo\": { \"@type\": \"ImageObject\", \"url\": \"https://f1000research.com/img/AMP/F1000Research_image.png\", \"height\": 480, \"width\": 60 } }, \"image\": { \"@type\": \"ImageObject\", \"url\": \"https://f1000research.com/img/AMP/F1000Research_image.png\", \"height\": 1200, \"width\": 150 }, \"description\": \" Background This study was designed to investigate the mediation effects of social empowerment (SE) in the relationship between perceived social support (PSS) and life satisfaction (LS) in women self-help group members. Also, this research attempted to understand the moderating effect of decision making (DM) and external communication (EC) on the relationship between the constructs. Methods To achieve the above objective, the primary data were collected from the self-help group women members by using an existing scale. In this survey, 333 participants who are members of self-help group completed the questionnaire and considered for the study. The study is non-experimental and survey-based, with no interventions or manipulations involved. In line with ethical guidelines, we obtained informed consent directly from each respondent before their participation. Conclusion The path coefficient values, t-statistics and P-Values confirmed the positive relationship between PSS-&gt;LS; PSS-&gt;SE &amp; SE-&gt;LS in women self-group members. PLS structural equation modelling estimated by the bootstrap method revealed that SE partially mediates the relationship between PSS &amp; LS. With regard to the interaction effect, the slope analysis and f2 effect size confirmed the moderating effect of EC in the relationship between PSS -&gt; LS &amp; SE -&gt; LS. \" } { \"@context\": \"http://schema.org\", \"@type\": \"BreadcrumbList\", \"itemListElement\": [ { \"@type\": \"ListItem\", \"position\": \"1\", \"item\": { \"@id\": \"https://f1000research.com/\", \"name\": \"Home\" } }, { \"@type\": \"ListItem\", \"position\": \"2\", \"item\": { \"@id\": \"https://f1000research.com/browse/articles\", \"name\": \"Browse\" } }, { \"@type\": \"ListItem\", \"position\": \"3\", \"item\": { \"@id\": \"https://f1000research.com/articles/14-101/v2\", \"name\": \"Measuring life satisfaction of self-help groups: Role of perceived...\" } } ] } Home Browse Measuring life satisfaction of self-help groups: Role of perceived... ALL Metrics - Views Downloads Get PDF Get XML Cite How to cite this article Suvarna S, Kumar S and Koodamara NK. Measuring life satisfaction of self-help groups: Role of perceived social support and social empowerment [version 2; peer review: 3 approved, 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved] . F1000Research 2025, 14 :101 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.148209.2 ) NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. Close Copy Citation Details Export Export Citation Sciwheel EndNote Ref. Manager Bibtex ProCite Sente EXPORT Select a format first Track Share ▬ ✚ Research Article Revised Measuring life satisfaction of self-help groups: Role of perceived social support and social empowerment [version 2; peer review: 3 approved, 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved] Suraksha Suvarna 1 , Satish Kumar https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7007-2064 2 , Navin Kumar Koodamara https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9198-8939 3 Suraksha Suvarna 1 , Satish Kumar https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7007-2064 2 , Navin Kumar Koodamara https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9198-8939 3 PUBLISHED 06 Mar 2025 Author details Author details 1 Department of Commerce, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India 2 Department of Commerce, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India 3 Manipal Institute of Management, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India Suraksha Suvarna Roles: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Funding Acquisition, Investigation, Writing – Original Draft Preparation Satish Kumar Roles: Methodology, Resources, Supervision, Writing – Review & Editing Navin Kumar Koodamara Roles: Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Validation OPEN PEER REVIEW DETAILS REVIEWER STATUS This article is included in the Sociology of Health gateway. This article is included in the Manipal Academy of Higher Education gateway. Abstract Background This study was designed to investigate the mediation effects of social empowerment (SE) in the relationship between perceived social support (PSS) and life satisfaction (LS) in women self-help group members. Also, this research attempted to understand the moderating effect of decision making (DM) and external communication (EC) on the relationship between the constructs. Methods To achieve the above objective, the primary data were collected from the self-help group women members by using an existing scale. In this survey, 333 participants who are members of self-help group completed the questionnaire and considered for the study. The study is non-experimental and survey-based, with no interventions or manipulations involved. In line with ethical guidelines, we obtained informed consent directly from each respondent before their participation. Conclusion The path coefficient values, t-statistics and P-Values confirmed the positive relationship between PSS->LS; PSS->SE & SE->LS in women self-group members. PLS structural equation modelling estimated by the bootstrap method revealed that SE partially mediates the relationship between PSS & LS. With regard to the interaction effect, the slope analysis and f 2 effect size confirmed the moderating effect of EC in the relationship between PSS -> LS & SE -> LS. READ ALL READ LESS Keywords Decision Making; External Communication; Life Satisfaction; Perceived Social Support; Social Empowerment; Women Empowerment. Corresponding Author(s) Satish Kumar ( [email protected] ) Close Corresponding author: Satish Kumar Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Grant information: This study was funded by the Indian Council of Social Science Research (ICSSR). The grant number is RFD/2022-23/GEN/COMM/89 The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Copyright: © 2025 Suvarna S et al . This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. How to cite: Suvarna S, Kumar S and Koodamara NK. Measuring life satisfaction of self-help groups: Role of perceived social support and social empowerment [version 2; peer review: 3 approved, 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved] . F1000Research 2025, 14 :101 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.148209.2 ) First published: 17 Jan 2025, 14 :101 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.148209.1 ) Latest published: 06 Mar 2025, 14 :101 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.148209.2 ) Revised Amendments from Version 1 In the new version the social desirability bias was acknowledged in the methodology section. The reason was elaborated why decision making do not moderate the relationship between social support and life satisfaction. Also, the significance of external communication in the relationship between perceived social support and life satisfaction was discussed. The barriers for the policy intervention is clearly discussed in the new version. In the new version the social desirability bias was acknowledged in the methodology section. The reason was elaborated why decision making do not moderate the relationship between social support and life satisfaction. Also, the significance of external communication in the relationship between perceived social support and life satisfaction was discussed. The barriers for the policy intervention is clearly discussed in the new version. See the authors' detailed response to the review by Andika Pratama READ REVIEWER RESPONSES 1. Introduction New and innovative therapeutic modalities, social services, and self-help groups have drawn much research attention in recent years. Research has also examined the outcomes of self-help group participation. One of the most critical themes in self-help group research is women’s social empowerment ( Cheung, Mok, & Cheung, 2005 ) and satisfaction with life. Women’s social empowerment is widely acknowledged as a critical driver of socioeconomic development, making it a key component of global efforts to promote progress and prosperity. Women’s social empowerment and life satisfaction have received considerable attention because of their potential to provide equal opportunities and outcomes for women, address gender inequities, alleviate poverty, and promote inclusive economic growth. Their contributions and empowerment have been instrumental in driving positive economic growth, and essential drivers of GDP growth ( Chatterjee, Gupta, & Upadhyaya, 2018 ; Khursheed, Azim Khan, & Mustafa, 2021). Further, Women’s self-help groups are essential for addressing poverty among marginalized people in developing countries. These organizations support viable socioeconomic growth and empower communities to raise themselves economically by providing financial services to people with little to no income Self-help groups support sustainable growth and offer possibilities for those previously excluded from formal banking (Khursheed, Azim Khan, & Mustafa, 2021). However, in almost all cultural, social, and political affairs, women face discrimination from society and their families. Females are mistreated and face many obstacles and difficulties in their daily life, which factors restricting women’s empowerment is lack of family support ( Qureshi & Shaikh, 2007 ). The social status of women consistently affects their life satisfaction ( Kyungeh, Ji-Young, O’Connor, & Wexler, 2008 ), where they draw less satisfaction from having used borrowed money but gain more satisfaction from joining self-help groups ( Hossain, Asadullah, & Kambhampati, 2019 ). This means that social status and empowerment are positively related to life satisfaction ( Kyungeh, Ji-Young, O’connor, & Wexler, 2008 ). Self-help groups play a significant role in promoting economic endeavours and enhancing rural women’s engagement in making decisions for their families. SHGs increase women’s participation in household decision making, access to financial and economic resources, social networks, and bargaining power. The significance of women’s active engagement in decision-making, both within families and on a broader national scale, has been recognized as crucial for attaining equality and fostering peace. Thus, the relationship among perceived social support, women’s social empowerment, and life satisfaction has attracted considerable research interest. Whether women are satisfied with their lives remains debated in the literature ( Hossain, Asadullah, & Kambhampati, 2019 ). Empowerment is also an instrument for improving life satisfaction of self-help group members ( Cheung, Mok, & Cheung, 2005 ). However, an in-depth investigation of the impact of empowerment on life satisfaction in overseas societies is an exciting topic for research ( Cheung, Mok, & Cheung, 2005 ). Furthermore, the research suggests that the influence of women’s empowerment on life satisfaction should be revisited ( Hossain, Asadullah, & Kambhampati, 2019 ). Although one study investigated the impact of life satisfaction in Western countries, further study is warranted to determine the differences in women’s life satisfaction in Asian countries ( Kyungeh, Ji-Young, O’connor, & Wexler, 2008 ). Furthermore, some studies have presented a simplified relationship between perceived social support and life satisfaction ( Danielsen, Samdal, Hetland, & Wold, 2009 ). However, this relationship may be more complex and could have been better represented in a model allowing additional pathways. Other variables not included in those studies could also influence the relationship between perceived social support and life satisfaction ( Danielsen, Samdal, Hetland, & Wold, 2009 ). Therefore, this study introduces an alternative model incorporating women’s social empowerment as a mediating variable and decision-making and external communication as moderating variables. This research focuses on women who are members of self-help groups, unlike previous studies that primarily targeted specific populations such as aging ( Sahin, Ozer, & Yanardag, 2019 ), students ( Akanni & Oduaran, 2018 ), and drug addicts ( Cao & Liang, 2017 ). Additionally, earlier studies have recommended future research to include a broader range of groups in geographically diverse areas ( Sahin, Ozer, & Yanardag, 2019 ). Some studies have conducted online surveys that are only accessible to individuals with the necessary technological resources, which reduces inclusivity. The current study aims to address this gap. Additionally, many studies fail to capture gender-specific data or go beyond the conventional scope of research. This study seeks to fill this methodological gap. Therefore, this study aims to contribute to the literature on the relationship between perceived social support, women’s social empowerment, and the life satisfaction of self-help group members. This study also investigated the effect of women’s social empowerment on the relationship between perceived social support and life satisfaction. Further, the present study investigated the interaction effect of women’s decision-making and external communication in the relationship between perceived social support, social empowerment, and life satisfaction of self-help group members. In this context, this study addressed the following research problem: Does perceived social support influence women’s life satisfaction through social empowerment? Does decision-making power and external communication influence the relationship between perceived social support, social empowerment, and life satisfaction? This is the research question of concern in this study. 2. Literature 2.1 Perceived social support and women’s social empowerment Women’s empowerment is a process that results in the movement of position from powerless to powerful. This means making women stronger and more financially, socially, and politically skilled. Women’s empowerment is a multidimensional concept in which women achieve greater control over material, financial, and intellectual resources ( Mohapatra & Sahoo, 2016 ). Perceived social support refers to an individual’s perception of material, psychological, and overall support from friends, family members, and other members of society whenever required ( Ioannou, Kassianos, & Symeou, 2019 ). Existing literature clarifies that perceived social support advances the sense of social empowerment in women ( Moradi & Funderburk, 2006 ). Perceived social support is critical predictor of social empowerment in women. Women’s perceived ability to draw attention to needed help contributes to their empowerment ( Cakir & Guneri, 2011 ). This study indicates that various types of perceived social support impact women’s empowerment differently ( Barringer, Hunter, Salina, & Jason, 2016 ). Consequently, positive perceived social support helps women empower resources to cope with multiple stressors and belonging support enhances perceived empowerment among women, creating an environment in which they engage in positive activities ( Barringer, Hunter, Salina, & Jason, 2016 ). However, there are relatively few empirical findings on the relationship between these two variables among self-help group members. 2.2 Women’s social empowerment and life satisfaction Life satisfaction has become an important issue in recent years for most organizations and governments. Countries such as the UK, Germany, Australia, and the USA spend considerable amounts of money and continuously track life satisfaction over time. The level of empowerment is significantly related to life satisfaction, regardless of income, gender, religion, geographical location, and so on ( Hossain et al., 2019 ). The perception of empowerment substantiates the sense of control over one’s life, improves self-esteem, and increases life satisfaction ( Cheung et al., 2005 ). Thus, life satisfaction, self-esteem, and a sense of mastery are the outcomes of social empowerment. The study found that women get more life satisfaction from being a self-help group member than from having a say in production decisions ( Hossain et al., 2019 ). According to a study by ( Panter-Brick, et al., 2024 ), women are eager and determined to be visible in society to showcase their capabilities. They need to be empowered to have the freedom to act in various situations and should receive social support to help them gain that freedom. Social empowerment can be fostered through the support of family and friends. Women’s narratives about empowerment and life satisfaction tend to be more holistic. Empowerment encompasses more than just financial or psychological well-being; it also includes opportunities for learning and self-education, which can lead to greater productivity within the community. Furthermore, life satisfaction is not solely about happiness; it intertwines with faith and family. While this study offers valuable insights into empowerment and life satisfaction, it falls short of exploring the connection between social empowerment and life satisfaction. In a study by ( Francescato, et al., 2017 ) the researchers aimed to explore how socio-demographic characteristics, modifiable dispositions, and relational well-being influence life satisfaction and empowerment. The findings indicated that dispositional variables played a significant role in empowerment while living situations and relational well-being had a minor impact. The study also highlighted that positivity, mainly through enhancing hopefulness, is substantial for empowerment. Additionally, it demonstrated that higher levels of relational well-being and positivity are crucial for improving life satisfaction. The importance of family support on life satisfaction was also emphasized. However, the study focused primarily on the roles of positivity and relational well-being in empowerment and life satisfaction, and it did not thoroughly address the interconnections between social empowerment and life satisfaction. 2.3 Perceived social support and life satisfaction Self-help group members experience several life challenges that require support from others. The others referred to here were family, friends, and colleagues. It is evident from research that support from family and friends is the strongest determinant of life satisfaction ( Akanni & Oduaran, 2018 ; Kasprzak, 2010 ). Social support plays a significant role in managing stress, leading to higher life satisfaction ( Mahanta & Agarwal, 2013 ). Females reported higher levels of perceived social support from friends than males, but there was no significant difference between males and females in terms of social support from family. Furthermore, females were found to have higher life satisfaction than males ( Mahanta & Agarwal, 2013 ). An increase in the extent of attachment leads to an increase in life satisfaction and a decrease in attachment among people, leading to a reduction in life satisfaction ( Shahyad, Besharat, Asadi, Shiralipour, & MirnaderMiri, 2011 ). Thus, perceived social support is a significant factor that influences life satisfaction ( Lu et al., 2015 ). Young adults who experience higher levels of social support tend to have greater life satisfaction ( Gan, Ong, Lee, & Lin, 2020 ). Support from friends, family, and others helps them cope with their problems, providing emotional affiliation and care ( Gan, Ong, Lee, & Lin, 2020 ) ( Yalcm, 2011 ) ( Alorani & Alradaydeh, 2018 ). Women, in particular, are often emotionally sensitive and may experience poor physical conditions, which makes it essential for them to receive adequate emotional and instrumental support ( Yu, Qiu, Liu, Cui, & Wu, 2020 ). Increased support from friends, family, and others can significantly enhance women’s life satisfaction ( Yu, Qiu, Liu, Cui, & Wu, 2020 ). Hypothesis development The study’s hypothesis was developed after the conceptual framework was finalized. The first hypothesis explored the relationship between Perceived Social Support (PSS) and Social Empowerment (SE). H1: Perceived Social Support (PSS) significantly influences Social Empowerment (SE). The second hypothesis investigates the relationship between perceived social support and life satisfaction. H2: Perceived Social Support (PSS) positively associated with Life Satisfaction (LS). hypothesis is developed to understand the nature of the relationship between social empowerment and life satisfaction. H3: Social Empowerment (SE) is positively related to Life Satisfaction (LS). The mediating role of SE The latent construct PSS is hypothesized to influence SE and Effects. The potential mediating effect of social empowerment is interesting to fill this research gap. Therefore, the fourth and fifth hypotheses were developed as follows: H4: Social Empowerment (SE) significantly mediates the relationship between PSS and LS. Moderating role of Decision Making (DM) and External Communication (EC) This study is also interested in understanding and confirming the moderating role of DM and EC in the relationship between the constructs. Hence, this study develops the following hypothesis to test this moderating effect: H5a: Decision making (DM) significantly moderates the relationship between PSS and LS. H5b: The DM significantly moderates the relationship between SE and LS. H6a: EC positively moderates the positive relationship between PSS and LS. H6b: EC negatively moderates the positive relationship between SE and LS. H6c: EC negatively moderates the positive relationship between PSS and SE. 3. Materials and methods 3.1 Sample In order to assess the hypothesis of the study, a comprehensive empirical investigation was carried out involving the members of three notable self-help groups: the Navodaya Self-Help Group, the Sthri Shakthi Self-Help Group, and the Shri Kshetra Dharmasthala Rural Development (SKDRD) self-help group, all located in the vibrant region of Southern Karnataka, India. The research utilized a judgmental sampling method, a strategic approach that allowed us to select participants based on our informed knowledge and insights. This method was deliberately chosen to ensure that we could target a specific demographic with anticipated characteristics that aligned with the objectives of our study. The final sample comprised a total of 333 individuals. Among the respondents, the largest segment, accounting for 43%, belonged to the middle age group of 40 to 50 years, indicating a robust representation of middle-aged individuals. In addition, 22% of the participants were in the 50 to 60 age range, while 18% were younger than 30. The study also captured insights from 17% of respondents who were aged 60 and over, highlighting a diverse age spectrum within the groups. More than 63% of the respondents were married, demonstrating a strong commitment to personal relationships, contrasting with approximately 37% who identified as single, divorced, or widowed. When examining employment status, a significant portion of the respondents, 46%, identified themselves as homemakers, reflecting the traditional roles often observed in the community. Meanwhile, 30% of the population were daily wage earners, who typically engage in various manual labor jobs to support their families. Around 24% were employed in the private or public sector, contributing to the local economy in different professional capacities. Remarkably, the participants in this study exhibited a deep-rooted connection to their self-help groups, with over 80% having engaged in their activities for more than a year. This statistic underscores not only their commitment but also the meaningful experiences and support that self-help groups provide to their members, fostering personal growth and community resilience. 3.2 Data collection procedure Data were gathered through a carefully designed survey questionnaire administered during the regular weekly meetings of the Self-Help Group (SHG) located in the southern Karnataka. The investigator actively facilitated the survey process, ensuring that all participants understood the questions and had the necessary support to complete the questionnaire. The researcher secured both verbal and written permission from all participants. The informed written consent form was included with the questionnaire. Verbal consent was obtained to affirm understanding of the research and participation in the study. Furthermore, data collection was voluntary, and all responses were anonymized. Participants were informed of their right to withdraw from the survey at any time, with the assurance that their personal information would be kept confidential. To ensure a comfortable setting, each member was allocated 15 minutes to complete the survey at their own pace thoughtfully. Once the members finished, the investigator collected the completed questionnaires. 3.3 Measurements The model formulated in this study comprises five distinct variables that interact to explore the relationship between perceived social support and life satisfaction. The independent variable, perceived social support (PSS), is at the forefront, quantified using a comprehensive 12-item scale developed by Zimet, Dahlem, Zimet, and Farley (1988) . This scale assesses the extent to which individuals feel supported by their social networks. The dependent variable under investigation is life satisfaction, evaluated through a 5-item scale created by Diener, Emmons, Larsen, and Griffin (1985) . This scale captures individuals’ overall contentment with their lives, providing insights into their subjective well-being. In addition to these primary variables, the model incorporates one intervening variable, Women’s Social Empowerment, which reflects how women feel empowered to make decisions and take action. Furthermore, the model features two moderators: decision-making and external communication. These moderators examine how the ability to make choices and communicate with others can influence the relationship between perceived social support and life satisfaction. The measures for Women’s Social Empowerment, decision-making, and external communication are derived from a scale developed by Chatterjee, Gupta, and Upadhyay in their 2018 research titled “Empowering Women and Stimulating Development at the Bottom of the Pyramid through Micro-entrepreneurship.” To gauge responses for all these constructs, participants completed a 5-point Likert scale survey, where a score of 5 indicates “Strongly Agree,” a score of 4 represents “Agree,” a score of 3 signifies “Neutral,” a score of 2 denotes “Disagree,” and a score of 1 means “Strongly Disagree.” This structured approach to measuring the variables enhances the depth and clarity of the study’s findings. 3.4 Common method bias To mitigate the risk of common method bias, the questionnaire was designed with the constructs arranged in a random order. This strategy was implemented to discourage respondents from making assumptions about causal relationships between the constructs based on their positioning in the survey. While social desirability bias can affect responses, particularly among women in self-help groups, this was minimized by not revealing the study’s purpose and assumptions to the participants. Additionally, we reassured respondents that there were no right or wrong answers and encouraged them to answer as accurately as possible based on their perceptions and realities. Furthermore, the analysis included a collinearity test, which reported a Variance Inflation Factor (VIF) value of less than 5. This result indicates that concerns regarding common method bias are unlikely to affect the findings of this study, thereby enhancing the validity of the results. 4. Results The outer loading of each item indicates the estimated relationship in the reflective measurement model that determines its contribution to the construct. Each indicator’s acceptable level of outer loading for any reflective model was greater than 0.6 ( Henseler, Ringle, & Sarstedt, 2012 ). Table 1 shows that the outer loading value of each indicator is above the threshold value of 0.6. Therefore, in the present study, there was no problem with the outer loading of any construct indicator. The indicator reliability is the square of each outer loading, where an indicator reliability of 0.4 or higher is acceptable ( Hulland, 1999 ). Table 1 shows that all indicators have individual reliability values much larger than the minimum adequate level of 0.4. Table 1. Result summary of reflective outer models. Construct Indicators Outer Loadings Indicator Reliability Composite Reliability Convergent Validity AVE Discriminant validity VIF Perceived Social Support PSS1 0.909 0.826 0.963 0.676 0.822 3.931 PSS2 0.896 0.802 1.995 PSS3 0.717 0.514 1.364 PSS4 0.734 0.538 1.931 PSS5 0.871 0.758 2.533 PSS6 0.828 0.685 2.517 PSS7 0.915 0.837 1.434 PSS8 0.812 0.659 3.754 PSS9 0.864 0.746 1.529 PSS10 0.892 0.795 4.331 PSS11 0.588 0.345 4.003 PSS12 0.780 0.608 3.983 Social Empowerment SWE1 0.875 0.765 0.893 0.691 0.831 2.216 SWE2 0.916 0.839 3.012 SWE3 0.711 0.505 1.549 SWE4 0.808 0.652 1.948 Life Satisfaction LS1 0.900 0.810 0.918 0.751 0.866 4.559 LS2 0.902 0.813 4.568 LS3 0.858 0.736 2.606 LS4 0.847 0.717 2.474 LS5 0.822 0.675 2.348 External Communication EXTWE11 0.711 0.505 0.715 0.670 0.780 3.433 EXTWE12 0.690 0.476 2.510 EXTWE13 0.673 0.452 3.434 EXTWE10 0.754 0.568 3.754 EXTWE5 0.671 0.450 1.519 EXTWE6 0.846 0.715 1.331 EXTWE7 0.881 0.776 1.258 EXTWE8 0.693 0.480 3.211 EXTWE9 0.815 0.664 1.960 Decision-Making Power DWE14 0.899 0.808 0.780 0.710 0.810 3.754 DWE15 0.956 0.913 4.529 DWE16 0.922 0.850 2.331 Furthermore, composite reliability or construct reliability measures the internal consistency of each item in the construct. To complete the examination of the structural model, it is essential to establish the reliability and validity of the latent variables. A composite reliability value of 0.7 or more is considered acceptable ( Bagozzi & Yi, 1988 ). Table 1 describes the composite reliability of all constructs as greater than the threshold level of 0.7. The convergent validity of each latent variable was assessed by examining the Average Variance Extracted (AVE). Generally, an AVE value of 0.5 or above is considered acceptable ( Bagozzi & Yi, 1988 ). The table indicates that all latent variables have an AVE value exceeding the 0.5 threshold, confirming their convergent validity. To establish discriminant validity, Fornell and Larcker (1981) recommended comparing the square root of AVE for each latent variable with its correlations with other latent variables. If the square root of AVE is greater than the correlations, discriminant validity is achieved. In this study, the square root of AVE for each construct surpassed the correlation values with other constructs, confirming discriminant validity. Additionally, we assessed potential collinearity issues within the inner model by examining the Variance Inflation Factor (VIF). A VIF value below 5 (or a tolerance level above 0.2) is generally considered acceptable to avoid collinearity problems ( Hair, Ringle, & Sarstedt, 2011 ). Table 1 shows that all VIF values for the variables are below 5, indicating no collinearity issues in the structural model of this study. 4.1 Measurement model In Figure 1 , the numbers on the arrows are path coefficients that indicate the direct effect of one variable (cause) on another variable (effect). The weights of the different path coefficients enabled us to rank their relative statistical importance. The path coefficient values between the two constructs of the structural model should be more than 0.20 to demonstrate its significance ( Wong, 2013 ). The path coefficient value in Figure 1 (inner model) explains that Perceived Social Support (PSS) has the most substantial effect on Social Empowerment (0.725) and Life Satisfaction (0.580). Social empowerment was a good predictor of life satisfaction (0.407). Figure 1. Measurement model to explain the relationship between the variables. Alt Text: Image of the measurement model, which explains the relationship between the PSS, SE, and LS. This image also explains the R 2 value (value in the circle) to show the overall impact of the independent variable on the dependent variable. The R 2 values or numbers in the circle show the extent to which the other latent variables explain the latent variable’s variance. In management research, the R 2 of 0.75 was substantial, 0.50 is moderate, and 0.25 is weak ( Wong, 2013 ). Figure 1 above shows that the coefficient of determination R 2 is 0.845 for the life satisfaction endogenous latent variable, implying that exogenous latent variables, i.e., perceived social support and social empowerment) explain 84.5% of the variance in life satisfaction of women’s self-help group members. Also, Figure 1 illustrates that the coefficient of determination R 2 is 0.526 for the women’s social empowerment, implying that perceived social support explains 52.6% variance in the social empowerment (SE). Table 2 presents the path, t-value, and statistical significance values for all the variables considered for the study. The positive path coefficient value in the relationship between different constructs considered for the study indicates a direct relationship between the two constructs. Using the bootstrapping procedure in the PLS-SEM, T-statistics were checked to see if the inner model’s path coefficient was significant. The path coefficient will be substantial if the T-statistics is higher than 1.96 using a two-tailed T-test with a significance level of 5% ( Wong, 2013 ). Table 2 explains that PSS (β=0.725, t=30.548, p=0.000) strongly influences the SE, supporting H1. Further, the exogenous variable PSS (β=0.580, t=13.781, p=0.000) and SE (β=0.407, t=9.446, p=0.000) strongly predict the endogenous variable life satisfaction, supporting H2 & H3. Table 2. Path coefficient, T-value and P-values. Relationship Path coefficient SE T statistics P values Perceived Social Support (PSS) and social Empowerment (SE) 0.725 0.024 30.548 0.000 Perceived Social Support (PSS) & Life Satisfaction (LS) 0.580 0.042 13.781 0.000 Social Empowerment (SE) & Life Satisfaction (LS) 0.407 0.043 9.446 0.000 4.2 Mediating analysis A mediation analysis was performed to assess the mediating role of social empowerment in the relationship between PSS and LS. The results (see Table 3 ) reveal a significant indirect effect of PSS on life satisfaction (β=0.295, t=9.084, p=0.000). PSS’s total effect of PSS ( Table 3 ) on LS was significant (β=0.875, t=64.127, p=0.000). However, as shown in Table 3 , the effect of PSS on LS was significantly reduced with inclusion of the mediator (SE) (β=0.295, t=9.084, p=0.000). The difference in the values can be easily seen in the results. This shows the mediating role of SE in the relationship between PSS and LS, thus supporting H4. Table 3. Mediating analysis. Relationship Original sample Standard deviation T statistics P values PSS -> SE -> LS 0.295 0.032 9.084 0.000 PSS -> LS 0.875 0.014 64.127 0.000 SE -> LS 0.407 0.043 9.446 0.000 4.3 Moderation analysis This study assessed the moderating role of DM on the relationship between PSS→ LS and SE→ LS. Without including the moderating effect (DM*PSS), the R-squared value for LS is 0.845. This shows that PSS accounts for an 84.5% change in LS. Including the interactive term, the R-square increased to 87.4%. This indicates an increase of 2.9% in variance explained by the dependent variable (LS). Furthermore, the significance of this moderating effect was analyzed. The results indicate a negative and insignificant moderating impact of DM on the relationship between PSS and LS (β=-0.001, t=0.025, p=0.980), not supporting H5a. This shows that, with an increase in DM, the relationship between PSS and LS is not weakened. Table 4 presents a summary of the moderation analyses. A similar observation was made in the moderating effect of DM on the relationship between SE and LS, not supporting H5b. Table 4. Moderation analysis (decision making). Relationship Beta *SE T Value P Value DM x PSS->LS -0.001 0.034 0.025 0.980 DM ->LS 0.223 0.025 8.846 0.000 PSS->LS 0.457 0.040 11.465 0.000 DM x SE->LS -0.031 0.036 0.861 0.389 SE->LS 0.371 0.033 11.279 0.000 Further, a slope analysis is presented to better understand the nature of the moderating effects ( Figure 3 ). As shown in Figure 2 , the line is flatter for low DM. This indicates that, at a low level of DM, the impact of PSS on LS is like that of higher DM. At higher DM, the line tends to flatter; this shows that at higher DM, the increase in PSS does not lead to a similar change in LS. In conclusion, a higher DM does not weaken the impact of PSS on LS. Figure 2. Moderation effect of decision-making. Alt Text: This image shows the moderating effect of decision-making in the relationship between PSS-LS & SE-LS. Figure 3. Slope analysis. Alt Text: This image explains the moderating effect of decision-making through the Slope Analysis (Graph). The X-axis represents PSS, and the Y-axis shows the LS. F 2 Effect size Regarding the interactive effect, the f 2 effect size indicates the extent to which moderation explains the endogenous construct. The f-square effect size was 0.00, which was insignificant. According to Cohen ( Cohen, 1988 ), f 2 effect size values of 0.02, 0.15, and 0.35 are considered as small, medium, and large effect sizes of moderation, respectively. In this study, there was a negligible or insignificant moderating effect. This indicates that the moderating effect does not contribute significantly to explaining the endogenous construct (LS). This study assessed the moderating role of EC on the relationship between constructs. Without including the moderating effect (EC*PSS), the R-squared value for LS is 0.845. This shows that PSS accounts for an 84.5% change in LS. Including the interactive term, the R-square increased to 89.9%. This indicates an increase of 5.4% in variance explained by the dependent variable (LS). Furthermore, the significance of this moderating effect was analyzed as shown in Figure 4 . The results indicate a positive and significant moderating impact of EC on the relationship between PSS and LS (β=-0.167, t=5.370, p=0.000), supporting H6a. This indicates that increased EC strengthens the relationship between PSS and LS. Table 5 presents a summary of the moderation analyses. Figure 4. Moderating effect of external communication. Alt Text: This image describes the moderating effect of external communication in the relationship between PSS-LS, PSS-SE, and SE-LS. Table 5. Moderating effect of External Communication (EC). Relationship Beta *SE T Value P Value EC x PSS->LS 0.167 0.031 5.370 0.000 EC x SE->LS -0.290 0.034 8.589 0.000 EC x PSS->SE -0.006 0.054 0.118 0.906 EC ->LS 0.091 0.046 1.994 0.046 SE->LS 0.317 0.037 8.542 0.000 Further, slope analysis is presented to better understand the nature of the moderating effects ( Figure 5 ). Figure 5. Slope analysis (moderating effect of EC). Alt Text: This image explains the moderating effect of external communication through the Slope Analysis (Graph). The X-axis represents PSS, and the Y-axis shows the LS. As shown in Figure 5 , the line is much steeper for low EC, indicating that at a low EC level, the impact of PSS on LS is much more robust compared to higher EC. However, at higher EC, the line tends to straighten, indicating that the increase in PSS leads to a similar change in LS at higher EC. In conclusion, higher EC strengthens the impact of PSS on LS. F 2 Effect size Concerning the interactive effect, the f 2 effect size indicates the extent to which moderation explains the endogenous construct. The F-squared effect size was 0.136, which was significant. According to Cohen ( Cohen, 1988 ), the f 2 effect size values of 0.02, 0.15, and 0.35 are considered small, medium, and large effect sizes of moderation, respectively. In this study, there was a moderately significant moderating effect. This shows that the moderating effect significantly explains the endogenous construct (LS). Furthermore, this study assessed the moderating role of EC on the relationship between SE and LS. The results indicate a negative and significant moderating impact of EC on the relationship between SE and LS (β=-0.290, t=8.589, p=0.000), supporting H6b. This shows that an increase in EC weakened the relationship between SE and LS. The F-squared effect size was 0.488, which was significant. This reveals that the EC has a large, significant moderating effect. This shows that the moderating effect of EC significantly contributes to explaining the endogenous construct (LS). However, the moderating effect of EC on the relationship between PSS and SE was insignificant (β=-0.006, t=0.118, p=0.906), which does not support H6c. 5. Discussion This research contributes to the existing knowledge on the role of perceived social support (PSS) and social empowerment (SE) on life satisfaction (LS) among female self-help group members. This study also describes the mediating effect of SE on the relationship between PSS and LS. Furthermore, this study empirically tested the interaction effect of decision-making (DM) and external communication (EC) on the relationships between PSS, SE, and LS. The present study revealed a significant positive association between PSS-SE, PSS-LS, and SE-LS scores. The results of the current study corresponded with the findings of other research that explains how social support to SHG women members (family, friends, relatives, etc.) empowers her socially ( Ghasemi, Badsar, Falahati, & Karamidehkordi, 2021 ; Dakhan, Sohu, Mustafa, Asadullah, & Sohu, 2021 ). The patient’s life satisfaction improved ( Alorani & Alradaydeh, 2018 ; Danielsen, Samdal, Hetland, & Wold, 2009 ). This implies that social support substantially affects social empowerment and life satisfaction. Social support changes women’s social status. It is evident from the findings of the present study that social support plays a significant role in women’s empowerment, which is consistent with the findings of previous studies ( Reininger, Pe’rez, Flores, Chen, & Rahbar, 2012 ; Ghasemi, Badsar, Falahati, & Karamidehkordi, 2021 ; Dakhan, Sohu, Mustafa, Asadullah, & Sohu, 2021 ). These findings suggest that women feel empowered when support is provided ( Chou et al., 2018 ). Support from family or friends also plays a significant role in handling stressful situations and boosting psychological wellbeing. Moreover, perceived social support provides women with self-help group members with better interpersonal relationships and comfort, leading to better life satisfaction. Thus, it is evident from this study that social support promotes life satisfaction, which is consistent with the results of previous studies ( Akanni & Oduaran, 2018 ; Alorani & Alradaydeh, 2018 ; Danielsen, Samdal, Hetland, & Wold, 2009 ; Shahyad et al., 2011 ; Ali et al., 2010 ). These findings signify that women who receive high social support have positive evaluations of their lives. Support may be in the form of advice, counseling, financial assistance, or timely help, which ultimately leads to a sense of life satisfaction. Therefore, women in the self-help group perceive a satisfied life if they provide social support. Family members should encourage women to participate in self-help group-related activities, which improves their social networks and, consequently, their life satisfaction. Research indicates that individuals with close friends in their congregations tend to feel more empowered and satisfied with their lives. Notably, those with more than ten friends in their congregation report significantly higher levels of satisfaction almost double that of individuals with no friends. This study suggests that frequent attendance at religious services contributes to life satisfaction not simply because of a more significant number of friends but precisely due to the presence of friends within the congregation. Therefore, social support, empowerment, and life satisfaction are interconnected. Additionally, women who regularly participate in self-help group activities may develop a stronger social network and experience greater satisfaction than those who do not. Ultimately, sitting alone in the pew does not enhance one’s life satisfaction ( Lim & Putnam, 2010 ). Further, this study has shown that life satisfaction is a prominent outcome of the social empowerment of female members of SHG, which is consistent with the findings of other studies ( Cheung, Mok, & Cheung, 2005 ; Hossain et al., 2019 ). These findings suggest that family relations, marital relations, and self-confidence improved after joining the self-help groups, which helped boost life satisfaction. This means judging how satisfied women are with their present state of affairs, based on their social empowerment. Therefore, the judgment of the overall life satisfaction of women is based on their sense of improvement in their marital or family relations. Therefore, this study answered affirmatively to the question: Will SHG members who experience a higher degree of social support and empowerment report a higher degree of life satisfaction? The findings also suggest that the state’s efforts in the last decade to support SHG members have effectively empowered and enhanced life satisfaction. This is the first study to explore how social support affects SHG life satisfaction using social empowerment as an intervening variable. It was statistically proven that the impact of social support on life satisfaction was passed through social empowerment. Feelings of social support might increase the sense of empowerment of SHG members, thereby improving their life satisfaction. Therefore, the current study’s findings highlight the significance of the context within which women’s social empowerment influences the relationship between social support and life satisfaction. Moreover, this research makes a significant contribution to the existing literature by assessing the moderating effect of decision-making and external communication on the relationship between PSS-LS and SE-LS. In the present study, decision-making does not moderate the relationship between Perceived social support and Life Satisfaction (PSS-LS) and empowerment and Life Satisfaction (SE-LS). This might be due to the varying degrees of women’s decision-making power across different aspects of life and in various situations. For instance, a woman may have sole autonomy to make decisions regarding household purchases, healthcare, and visits to relatives, but she may have little control over asset purchases. Additionally, traditional beliefs and norms influence a woman’s decision-making power in some cultures. The level of decision-making power can also vary between rural and urban areas and is often affected by educational and occupational status. Furthermore, some women may hesitate to make certain decisions due to their shy nature. However, the moderating effect of external communication on the relationship between PSS-LS and SE-LS was significant. These results indicate that external communication is an important index that reflects empowerment and life satisfaction. This means that the higher the level of external communication, the greater is the effect of social support on life satisfaction and empowerment. Access to information serves as a powerful catalyst for empowering women, unlocking doors to new opportunities and experiences. The most prevalent avenues for this access are the flickering screens of televisions, the buzz of mobile phones, and the rich tapestry of face-to-face conversations. These forms of communication can reach women, igniting their participation in economic and social progress while enabling them to make informed decisions on issues that profoundly impact their lives. As women connect through these diverse communication channels, they weave an intricate web of social networks, fostering relationships that nurture personal growth. This interconnectedness cultivates a deep sense of self-efficacy, instilling confidence and self-assurance that radiates in their daily lives. Ultimately, this surge in empowerment leads to greater life satisfaction, encouraging women to embrace their potential and thrive in their communities. 6. Implications The results of this paper offer significant contributions and policy recommendations for NGOs, policymakers, and governments to consider. In light of these findings, policymakers and governments can implement measures to empower women in developing countries, particularly India. Due to cultural and societal constraints, women often cannot contribute socially and economically. Therefore, policymakers must focus on the women’s community to promote gender equality. To address these challenges, the government should enhance employment and entrepreneurship opportunities for women. Access to credit at discounted rates should be made available to empower women to invest, save, and build their assets. Additionally, the government should provide health facilities, nutritional support, better housing, and other welfare measures to improve women’s overall well-being. Policymakers need to be aware that social support and empowerment are vital to women’s life satisfaction. Through the self-help group (SHG), policymakers should encourage the role of psychological counselors in conducting an assessment of female members with low social support, low empowerment, and less satisfaction. The state should provide the necessary programs for women’s participation in SHG activities to develop a social network. This helps them to create a plan of action to promote self-help group members’ sense of social support, empowerment, and life satisfaction. Furthermore, SHG managers can empower their members by facilitating solid social support, leading to life satisfaction. It is also essential to encourage and motivate women to participate in external communication, which strengthens the relationship between social support, empowerment, and life satisfaction. 7. Limitations and future scope of research This study was a cross-sectional survey, in which it was difficult to precisely determine and analyze the causal relationships between variables over time. In addition, cross-sectional analyses may be prone to bias. Therefore, longitudinal studies should be considered in the future. The longitudinal approach can be employed to collect data repeatedly over an extended period. This method allows researchers to observe changes in empowerment and life satisfaction over time, helping them examine how various factors evolve. Maintaining consistent data collection methods throughout the study is crucial for accurate results. Additionally, future researchers could conduct qualitative studies using focus group discussions to gain deeper insights into the factors influencing women’s life satisfaction in self-help groups. Further, the current study evaluated a sample from the three significant SHGs, Navodaya, Sthri Shakthi, and Shri Kshetra Dharmasthala Rural Development (SKDRD), ignoring the members of the other SHG are present in these areas. Future research should consider samples from all SHGs to generalize our findings. The study focused exclusively on respondents from southern Karnataka, India, due to certain constraints faced by the researchers. As a result, this limitation affects the generalizability of the research findings to a broader population of self-help groups. Furthermore, using a cross-sectional design means that all variables were measured simultaneously, which restricts our ability to establish causal relationships between social support and life satisfaction outcomes. Future studies could adopt longitudinal or experimental designs to investigate how social support and life satisfaction change. This study has addressed life satisfaction in general; however, to gain a deeper understanding of the concept, future researchers might consider examining various dimensions of life satisfaction, such as economic and psychological aspects. 8. Conclusion This study concluded that perceived social support and social empowerment are significant in improving the life satisfaction of self-help group members. We have attempted to shed light on social support and empowerment as a mechanism to increase the life satisfaction of female SHG members. The results of the present study further revealed that social empowerment mediates the relationship between perceived social support and life satisfaction, which is a unique finding of this study. Moreover, this study demonstrated for the first time that external communication intensifies the influence of perceived social support and social empowerment on life satisfaction. Ethics and consent: Given the non-experimental, survey-based design of this research, formal ethical approval was taken from the Institutional ethics committee. The signed informed consent was collected from each research participant. The informed consent form was included with the questionnaire. The researcher secured both verbal and written permission from all participants. The verbal consent was obtained to affirm understanding of the research and participation in the study. Furthermore, data collection was voluntary, and all responses were anonymized. Participants were informed of their right to withdraw from the survey at any time, with assurances that their personal information would be kept confidential. Approval No: IECI: 412/2022 Date of Approval: 14 th December 2022 Name: Kasturba Medical College and Kasturba Hospital Institutional Ethics Committee Data availability Underlying data Dryad: Coded respondents survey data to measure life satisfaction of self-help group women members. https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.6hdr7sr9f ( Suvarna et al. , 2024 ). The project contains the following underlying data: - Response_Sheet.csv Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero “No rights reserved” data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication). Extended data Dryad: Coded respondents survey data to measure life satisfaction of self-help group women members. https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.6hdr7sr9f ( Suvarna et al. , 2024 ). The project contains the following extended data: - README.md (Questionnaire) Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero “No rights reserved” data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication). References Akanni AA, Oduaran CA: Perceived social support and life satisfaction among freshmen: Mediating roles of academic self-efficacy and academic adjustment. J. Psychol. Afr. 2018; 28 (2): 89–93. Publisher Full Text Ali A, Deuri SP, Deuri SK, et al. : Perceived social support and life satisfaction in persons with somatization disorder. Ind. Psychiatry J. 2010; 19 (2): 115–118. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text Alorani OI, Alradaydeh MF: Spiritual well-being, perceived social support, and life satisfaction among university students. Int. J. Adolesc. Youth. 2018; 23 (3): 291–298. Publisher Full Text Bagozzi RP, Yi Y: On the Evalauation of Structural Equation Models. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 1988; 16 (1): 74–94. Publisher Full Text Barringer A, Hunter BA, Salina DD, et al. : Empowerment and Social Support: Implications for Practice and Programming Among Minority Women with Substance Abuse and Criminal Justice Histories. J. Behav. Health Serv. Res. 2016; 75–88. Cakir SG, Guneri OY: Exploring the factors contributing to empowerment of Turkish migrant women in the UK. Int. J. Psychol. 2011; 46 (3): 223–233. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text Cao Q, Liang Y: Perceived social support and life satisfaction in drug addicts: Self- esteem and loneliness as mediators. J. Health Psychol. 2017; 25 (7): 976–985. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text Chatterjee S, Gupta SD, Upadhyaya P: Empowering women and stimulating development at bottom of pyramid through micro-entrepreneurship. Manag. Decis. 2018; 56 (1): 160–174. Publisher Full Text Cheung YW, Mok B-H, Cheung T-S: Personal empowerment and life satisfaction among self-help group members in HongKong. Small Group Res. 2005; 36 (3): 354–377. Publisher Full Text Chou JL, Pierce KJ, Pennington LB, et al. : Social Support, Family Empowerment, Substance Use, and Perceived Parenting Competency during Pregnancy for Women with Substance Use Disorders. Subst. Use Misuse. 2018; 53 : 2250–2256. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text Cohen J: Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Science. New York: LAWRENCE ERLBAUM ASSOCIATES, PUBLISHERS; 1988. Dakhan SA, Sohu JM, Mustafa S, et al. : FACTORS INFLUENCING POLITICAL ORIENTATION: MEDIATING ROLE OF WOMEN EMPOWERMENT. International Journal of Management (IJM). 2021; 12 (1): 786–795. Publisher Full Text Danielsen AG, Samdal O, Hetland J, et al. : School-Related Social Support and Students’ Perceived Life Satisfaction. J. Educ. Res. 2009; 102 (4): 303–320. Publisher Full Text Diener E, Emmons RA, Larsen RJ, et al. : The Satisfaction With Life Scale. J. Pers. Assess. 1985; 49 (1): 71–75. Publisher Full Text Fornell C, Larcker DF: Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 1981; 18 (1): 39–50. Publisher Full Text Francescato D, Pezzuti L, Mebane M, et al. : Dispositional characteristics, relational well-being and perceived life satisfaction and empowerment of elders. Aging Ment. Health. 2017; 21 (10): 1052–1057. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text Gan S-W, Ong SL, Lee CH, et al. : Perceived Social Support and Life Satisfaction of Malaysian Chinese Young Adults: The Mediating Effect of Loneliness. J. Genet. Psychol. 2020; 181 (6): 458–469. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text Ghasemi M, Badsar M, Falahati L, et al. : The mediation effect of rural women empowerment between social factors and environment conservation. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2021; 23 : 13755–13777. Publisher Full Text Hair JF, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M: PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet. J. Mark. Theory Pract. 2011; 19 (2): 139–152. Publisher Full Text Henseler J, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M: Using Partial Least Squares Path Modeling in Adversting Research: Basic Concepts and Recent Issues.Okazaki S, Okazaki S, editors. Hand Book of Research on International Advertising Edward Elgar; 2012; pp. 252–276. Hossain M, Asadullah MN, Kambhampati U: Empowerment and life satisfaction: Evidence from Bangladesh. World Dev. 2019; 122 : 170–183. Publisher Full Text Hulland J: Use of Partial Least Squares (PLS) in Strategic Management Research: A Review of Four Recent Studies. Strateg. Manag. J. 1999; 20 (1): 195–204. <a target=\"xrefwindow\" id=\"d96949e2541\" href=\"https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199902)20:2 Publisher Full Text Ioannou M, Kassianos AP, Symeou M: Coping With Depressive Symptoms in Young Adults: Perceived Social Support Protects Against Depressive Symptoms Only Under Moderate Levels of Stress. Front. Psychol. 2019; 9 : 1–11. Publisher Full Text Kasprzak E: Perceived social support and life-satisfaction. Pol. Psychol. Bull. 2010; 41 : 144–154. Publisher Full Text Kyungeh A, Ji-Young A, O’connor L, et al. : Life Satisfaction, Self-Esteem, and Perceived Health Status Among Elder Korean Women: Focus on Living Arrangements. J. Transcult. Nurs. 2008; 19 (2): 151–160. Publisher Full Text Lim C, Putnam RD: Religion, Social Networks, and Life Satisfaction. Am. Sociol. Rev. 2010; 75 (6): 914–933. Publisher Full Text Lu M, Yang G, Skora E, et al. : Self-esteem, social support, and life satisfaction in Chinese parents of children with autism spectrum disorder. Res. Autism Spectr. Disord. 2015; 17 : 70–77. Publisher Full Text Mahanta D, Agarwal M: Effect of Perceived Social Support on Life Satisfaction of University Students. Eur. Acad. Res. 2013; 1085. Mohapatra S, Sahoo BK: Determinants of participation in self-help-groups (SHG) and its impact on women empowerment. Indian Growth and Development Review. 2016; 9 (1): 53–78. Publisher Full Text Moradi B, Funderburk JR: Roles of perceived sexist events and perceived social support in the mental health of women seeking counseling. J. Couns. Psychol. 2006; 53 (4): 464–473. Publisher Full Text Panter-Brick C, Qtaishat L, Eggerman JJ, et al. : Volunteer programs, empowerment, and life satisfaction in Jordan: mapping local knowledge and systems change to inform public policy and science diplomacy. Front. Sociol. 2024; 9 (13): 1–16. Publisher Full Text Qureshi N, Shaikh BT: Women’s empowerment and health: The role of institutions of power in Pakistan. East Mediterr. Health J. 2007; 13 (6): 1459–1465. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text Reininger BM, Pe´rez A, Flores MA, et al. : Perceptions of Social Support, Empowerment and Youth Risk Behaviors. J. Prim. Prev. 2012; 33 (1): 33–46. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text Sahin DS, Ozer O, Yanardag MZ: Perceived social support, quality of life and satisfaction with life in elderly people. Educ. Gerontol. 2019; 45 (1): 69–77. Publisher Full Text Shahyad S, Besharat AM, Asadi, et al. : The Relation of Attachment and perceived social support with Life Satisfaction: Structural Equation Model. Procedia. Soc. Behav. Sci. 2011; 15 : 952–956. Publisher Full Text Suvarna S, Kumar S, Koodamara N: Coded respondents survey data to measure life satisfaction of self-help group women members. [Dataset]. Dryad. 2024. Publisher Full Text Wong KK-K: Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Techniques Using SmartPLS. Mark. Bull. 2013; 24 (1): 1–32. Yalcm I: Social Support and Optimism as Predictors of Life Satisfaction of College Students. Int. J. Adv. Counselling. 2011; 33 (1): 79–87. Yu M, Qiu T, Liu C, et al. : The mediating role of perceived social support between anxiety symptoms and life satisfaction in pregnant women: a cross-sectional study. Health Qual. Life Outcomes. 2020; 18 (1): 223. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text Zimet GD, Dahlem NW, Zimet SG, et al. : The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. J. Pers. Assess. 1988; 52 (1): 30–41. Publisher Full Text Comments on this article Comments (0) Version 2 VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 17 Jan 2025 ADD YOUR COMMENT Comment Author details Author details 1 Department of Commerce, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India 2 Department of Commerce, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India 3 Manipal Institute of Management, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India Suraksha Suvarna Roles: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Funding Acquisition, Investigation, Writing – Original Draft Preparation Satish Kumar Roles: Methodology, Resources, Supervision, Writing – Review & Editing Navin Kumar Koodamara Roles: Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Validation Competing interests No competing interests were disclosed. Grant information This study was funded by the Indian Council of Social Science Research (ICSSR). The grant number is RFD/2022-23/GEN/COMM/89 The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Article Versions (2) version 2 Revised Published: 06 Mar 2025, 14:101 https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.148209.2 version 1 Published: 17 Jan 2025, 14:101 https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.148209.1 Copyright © 2025 Suvarna S et al . This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Download Export To Sciwheel Bibtex EndNote ProCite Ref. Manager (RIS) Sente metrics Views Downloads F1000Research - - PubMed Central info_outline Data from PMC are received and updated monthly. - - Citations open_in_new 0 open_in_new 0 open_in_new SEE MORE DETAILS CITE how to cite this article Suvarna S, Kumar S and Koodamara NK. Measuring life satisfaction of self-help groups: Role of perceived social support and social empowerment [version 2; peer review: 3 approved, 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved] . F1000Research 2025, 14 :101 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.148209.2 ) NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS track receive updates on this article Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article. TRACK THIS ARTICLE Share Open Peer Review Current Reviewer Status: ? Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW HIDE Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions Version 2 VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 06 Mar 2025 Revised Views 0 Cite How to cite this report: Barba-Sánchez V. Reviewer Report For: Measuring life satisfaction of self-help groups: Role of perceived social support and social empowerment [version 2; peer review: 3 approved, 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved] . F1000Research 2025, 14 :101 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.179008.r371650 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/14-101/v2#referee-response-371650 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. Close Copy Citation Details Reviewer Report 10 Jul 2025 Virginia Barba-Sánchez , ENSITMA R.G., Department of Business Science, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Albacete, Spain Approved with Reservations VIEWS 0 https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.179008.r371650 Thank you for the opportunity to review the manuscript ‘Measuring life satisfaction of self-help groups: Role of perceived social support and social empowerment’ submitted to F1000Research. I enjoyed reading the manuscript and found it to be an informative study of ... Continue reading READ ALL Thank you for the opportunity to review the manuscript ‘Measuring life satisfaction of self-help groups: Role of perceived social support and social empowerment’ submitted to F1000Research. I enjoyed reading the manuscript and found it to be an informative study of factors that affect the life satisfaction of self-help groups. Overall, the research addresses the relevant topic and takes as a starting point some questions that require further investigation. These research questions should be developed in a theoretical and conceptual framework. Empirical analysis has been carried out to provide evidence for research questions, but their research hypotheses are wrongly formulated, since readers need not know what a mediating and/or moderating effect is. I would highly recommend that the authors rewrite the hypotheses. The results are appropriately interpreted and discussed. So, the manuscript has potential, but the reasoning does not flow naturally. The paper must be improved in line with the comments below: The last three sentences of the abstract are superfluous in the summary; however, it would be good to specify the implications of the study. Regarding the Introduction, the first two paragraphs need to be enhanced with more arguments exemplifying the importance of life satisfaction and this research. There is a lot of published work, such as Barba-Sanchez et al. (2024) (Ref 1), to strengthen the narrative on this. In the introduction, it is very worthwhile to introduce readers in more detail to the social and cultural context in southern Karnataka. Section 2 should integrate the hypotheses. Please rewrite the hypotheses. In section 2, you introduce the theoretical framework, but it is a succession of empirical works without theoretical cohesion. Please explain. The sample has been chosen to demonstrate that it is representative of the society being studied. We would also recommend adding a table with accurate information about the technical specifications of the study and another table with the comparative demographics between the population and sample. Please specify the different items used to compose the different measurements. It could incorporate them in one simplified table, which shows a list of items used to measure each of the hypotheses. Why aren’t control variables used? Please add the Conbrach’s Alpha and the HTMT0.85 criteria in Table 1. Please add an endogeneity study to ensure that no important variables are missing from the model. An article must be self-contained, i.e. it must contain all the information necessary for its comprehension. In this sense, please add the direct effect, t-value, p-value, percentile confidence interval (PCI), and f 2 in Table 2. Please add the total effect and indirect effect, t-value, VAF, and percentile confidence interval (PCI) in Table 3. In addition, please add a new table with the moderation effects of decision-making and external communication. Please note that your proposed model corresponds to Hayes's (2015) case number 58. The conclusion and discussion sections lack significant theoretical references to the findings. We hope you find the above comments useful and we wish you the best of luck with developing the paper further. Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature? Partly Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound? Partly Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? Partly If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? Partly Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility? Yes Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results? Yes References 1. Barba-Sánchez V, Salinero Y, Jiménez Estévez P, Ruiz-Palomino P: How entrepreneurship drives life satisfaction among people with intellectual disabilities (PwID): a mixed-method approach. Management Decision . 2024; 62 (2): 426-449 Publisher Full Text 2. Hayes A: An Index and Test of Linear Moderated Mediation. Multivariate Behavioral Research . 2015; 50 (1): 1-22 Publisher Full Text Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise: Measuring social value, Entrepreneurship, Structural equations. I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above. Close READ LESS CITE CITE HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT Barba-Sánchez V. Reviewer Report For: Measuring life satisfaction of self-help groups: Role of perceived social support and social empowerment [version 2; peer review: 3 approved, 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved] . F1000Research 2025, 14 :101 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.179008.r371650 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/14-101/v2#referee-response-371650 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS Report a concern Respond or Comment COMMENT ON THIS REPORT Views 0 Cite How to cite this report: Sapre N. Reviewer Report For: Measuring life satisfaction of self-help groups: Role of perceived social support and social empowerment [version 2; peer review: 3 approved, 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved] . F1000Research 2025, 14 :101 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.179008.r371644 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/14-101/v2#referee-response-371644 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. Close Copy Citation Details Reviewer Report 08 Apr 2025 Nikhil Sapre , University of Bristol Business School, Bristol, UK Approved VIEWS 0 https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.179008.r371644 This study examines the life satisfaction of women in self help groups in Southern India. The literature review critically evaluates recent studies leading to six well developed hypotheses. Appropriate and robust empirical methods have been employed. The discussion situates the ... Continue reading READ ALL This study examines the life satisfaction of women in self help groups in Southern India. The literature review critically evaluates recent studies leading to six well developed hypotheses. Appropriate and robust empirical methods have been employed. The discussion situates the results in the broader literature and makes sound policy recommendations. Concerns around the sample and research design raised on the first submission, have been sufficiently addressed in the current version. Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature? Yes Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound? Yes Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? Yes If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? Yes Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility? Yes Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results? Yes Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise: Banking, Social Finance I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. Close READ LESS CITE CITE HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT Sapre N. Reviewer Report For: Measuring life satisfaction of self-help groups: Role of perceived social support and social empowerment [version 2; peer review: 3 approved, 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved] . F1000Research 2025, 14 :101 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.179008.r371644 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/14-101/v2#referee-response-371644 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS Report a concern Respond or Comment COMMENT ON THIS REPORT Views 0 Cite How to cite this report: Sateeshchandra NG. Reviewer Report For: Measuring life satisfaction of self-help groups: Role of perceived social support and social empowerment [version 2; peer review: 3 approved, 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved] . F1000Research 2025, 14 :101 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.179008.r371647 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/14-101/v2#referee-response-371647 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. Close Copy Citation Details Reviewer Report 26 Mar 2025 Navya Gubbi Sateeshchandra , Berlin School of Business and Innovation, Berlin, Berlin, Germany Approved VIEWS 0 https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.179008.r371647 The article highlights how life satisfaction is impacted by a perceived social support and social empowerment. The study is significant in the field of social science and helpful to other researchers. The researchers have made an effort not only to ... Continue reading READ ALL The article highlights how life satisfaction is impacted by a perceived social support and social empowerment. The study is significant in the field of social science and helpful to other researchers. The researchers have made an effort not only to examine the direct relationships but also to explore how mediators influence the connection. Perceived social support and social empowerment is an important factor in life satisfaction. The title of the article attracts interested scholars and practitioners. The author has made efforts to address the importance of social support and women empowerment by exploring the complex relationship between social support and life satisfaction. Further, the findings of the study can help policy makers to develop strategies towards women empowerment and improve life satisfaction of self-help group members. The robust methodology ensures an insightful understanding by making the purpose of the study evident and valuable for various practitioners, NGO's and policy makers. In this context, I approve this article without any revisions. Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature? Yes Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound? Yes Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? Yes If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? Yes Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility? Yes Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results? Yes Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise: Economics, institutional Economics, Public Policy, Sustainable Development I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. Close READ LESS CITE CITE HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT Sateeshchandra NG. Reviewer Report For: Measuring life satisfaction of self-help groups: Role of perceived social support and social empowerment [version 2; peer review: 3 approved, 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved] . F1000Research 2025, 14 :101 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.179008.r371647 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/14-101/v2#referee-response-371647 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS Report a concern Respond or Comment COMMENT ON THIS REPORT Views 0 Cite How to cite this report: Pratama A. Reviewer Report For: Measuring life satisfaction of self-help groups: Role of perceived social support and social empowerment [version 2; peer review: 3 approved, 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved] . F1000Research 2025, 14 :101 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.179008.r369751 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/14-101/v2#referee-response-369751 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. Close Copy Citation Details Reviewer Report 14 Mar 2025 Andika Pratama , Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Indonesia; Community Education, Universitas Sriwijaya (Ringgold ID: 175522), Palembang, South Sumatra, Indonesia Approved VIEWS 0 https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.179008.r369751 Having carefully assessed the revisions made to the manuscript, I am pleased to confirm that the authors have satisfactorily addressed the concerns raised in my previous review. The incorporation of an acknowledgement of social desirability bias within the methodology section, ... Continue reading READ ALL Having carefully assessed the revisions made to the manuscript, I am pleased to confirm that the authors have satisfactorily addressed the concerns raised in my previous review. The incorporation of an acknowledgement of social desirability bias within the methodology section, along with a more detailed explanation of why decision-making does not moderate the relationship between social support and life satisfaction, significantly enhances the clarity and robustness of the study. Furthermore, the expanded discussion on the role of external communication and the delineation of barriers to policy intervention provide a more comprehensive understanding of the findings. Given these improvements, I find the revised manuscript sufficiently aligned with the required standards and am happy to amend my previous status of Approved with reservations to Approved. Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise: I am a researcher and practitioner in the fields of social work, community education, and community empowerment. My expertise enables me to rigorously evaluate scholarly research, ensuring that studies contribute meaningfully to academic discourse I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. Close READ LESS CITE CITE HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT Pratama A. Reviewer Report For: Measuring life satisfaction of self-help groups: Role of perceived social support and social empowerment [version 2; peer review: 3 approved, 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved] . F1000Research 2025, 14 :101 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.179008.r369751 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/14-101/v2#referee-response-369751 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS Report a concern Respond or Comment COMMENT ON THIS REPORT Version 1 VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 17 Jan 2025 Views 0 Cite How to cite this report: Pratama A. Reviewer Report For: Measuring life satisfaction of self-help groups: Role of perceived social support and social empowerment [version 2; peer review: 3 approved, 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved] . F1000Research 2025, 14 :101 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.162492.r363968 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/14-101/v1#referee-response-363968 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. Close Copy Citation Details Reviewer Report 27 Feb 2025 Andika Pratama , Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Indonesia; Community Education, Universitas Sriwijaya (Ringgold ID: 175522), Palembang, South Sumatra, Indonesia Approved with Reservations VIEWS 0 https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.162492.r363968 The article, \" Measuring Life Satisfaction of Self-Help Groups: Role of Perceived Social Support and Social Empowerment ,\" presents a relevant and contemporary analysis of the interplay between perceived social support, social empowerment, and life satisfaction among women members of self-help groups. ... Continue reading READ ALL The article, \" Measuring Life Satisfaction of Self-Help Groups: Role of Perceived Social Support and Social Empowerment ,\" presents a relevant and contemporary analysis of the interplay between perceived social support, social empowerment, and life satisfaction among women members of self-help groups. While the study contributes to the existing body of literature on social empowerment and its psychological and social benefits, several critical aspects warrant closer examination. The conceptual foundation of the study is well-framed within the broader discourse on women’s empowerment, but certain theoretical gaps are apparent. The literature review, though extensive, lacks a nuanced critique of prior studies, particularly concerning methodological limitations and conflicting findings. While multiple references support the claims made, the integration of theoretical perspectives remains relatively superficial. The discussion on the role of social empowerment in enhancing life satisfaction is compelling but does not sufficiently address alternative explanations or counterarguments that could provide a more balanced understanding. The methodology demonstrates a systematic approach, yet there are notable concerns regarding sampling and data collection. The use of judgmental sampling, while justified for targeting specific demographics, raises questions about selection bias and the generalizability of findings. The study states that 333 participants were surveyed from three self-help groups in Southern Karnataka, India, but does not clarify whether these groups are representative of the broader population of self-help group members across different cultural and socioeconomic contexts. The reliance on self-reported measures, though common in social science research, introduces the potential for social desirability bias, which the study does not explicitly acknowledge or control for. The statistical analysis is robust, employing partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) with bootstrapping. The authors present clear evidence of mediation effects, reinforcing the claim that social empowerment partially mediates the relationship between perceived social support and life satisfaction. However, the moderation analysis results are less conclusive, with decision-making showing an insignificant moderating effect while external communication exhibits a significant impact. The interpretation of these findings could be expanded to explore why decision-making did not exert a moderating influence, especially given the broader discourse on women’s empowerment and autonomy. One notable strength of the study is its focus on external communication as a moderating variable, an aspect often overlooked in similar research. The findings suggest that higher levels of external communication strengthen the relationship between perceived social support and life satisfaction. However, the study could have further interrogated the mechanisms underlying this effect. For instance, does external communication facilitate access to better resources, enhance self-efficacy, or contribute to greater community engagement? Addressing these aspects would enhance the study’s explanatory power. The discussion and implications section aligns with the study’s objectives, providing practical recommendations for policymakers, self-help group managers, and social workers. The emphasis on fostering external communication to enhance life satisfaction is particularly valuable. However, the study could benefit from a more critical engagement with policy implications. While it advocates for increased social support initiatives, it does not sufficiently address structural barriers such as gender norms, economic constraints, and institutional limitations that may impede the effectiveness of such interventions. Despite its contributions, the study has limitations that should have been more explicitly acknowledged. The cross-sectional design restricts the ability to infer causality, and while the authors suggest longitudinal studies for future research, they do not outline a clear methodological framework for how such studies could be conducted. Additionally, qualitative insights from self-help group members could have provided richer contextual understanding and complemented the quantitative findings. Overall, this study makes a meaningful contribution to understanding the dynamics of social support, empowerment, and life satisfaction among women in self-help groups. However, it would benefit from a more critical engagement with theoretical perspectives, a more rigorous discussion of methodological constraints, and a deeper exploration of the mechanisms driving the observed relationships. Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature? Partly Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound? Yes Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? Yes If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? Partly Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility? Yes Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results? Partly Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise: I am a researcher and practitioner in the fields of social work, community education, and community empowerment. My expertise enables me to rigorously evaluate scholarly research, ensuring that studies contribute meaningfully to academic discourse I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above. Close READ LESS CITE CITE HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT Pratama A. Reviewer Report For: Measuring life satisfaction of self-help groups: Role of perceived social support and social empowerment [version 2; peer review: 3 approved, 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved] . F1000Research 2025, 14 :101 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.162492.r363968 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/14-101/v1#referee-response-363968 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS Report a concern Author Response 08 Mar 2025 SATISH KUMAR , Department of Commerce, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, India 08 Mar 2025 Author Response Reviewer Comments: The conceptual foundation of the study is well-framed within the broader discourse on women’s empowerment, but certain theoretical gaps are apparent. The literature review, though extensive, lacks a ... Continue reading Reviewer Comments: The conceptual foundation of the study is well-framed within the broader discourse on women’s empowerment, but certain theoretical gaps are apparent. The literature review, though extensive, lacks a nuanced critique of prior studies, particularly concerning methodological limitations and conflicting findings. While multiple references support the claims made, the integration of theoretical perspectives remains relatively superficial. The discussion on the role of social empowerment in enhancing life satisfaction is compelling but does not sufficiently address alternative explanations or counterarguments that could provide a more balanced understanding. Author Response: Thank you for the valuable suggestions. We have addressed the concern positively in the literature section pertaining to social empowerment and life satisfaction. Reviewer Comment: The methodology demonstrates a systematic approach, yet there are notable concerns regarding sampling and data collection. The use of judgmental sampling, while justified for targeting specific demographics, raises questions about selection bias and the generalizability of findings. The study states that 333 participants were surveyed from three self-help groups in Southern Karnataka, India, but does not clarify whether these groups are representative of the broader population of self-help group members across different cultural and socioeconomic contexts. The reliance on self-reported measures, though common in social science research, introduces the potential for social desirability bias, which the study does not explicitly acknowledge or control for. Authors Response: Thank you for the comments. We have acknowledged the social desirability bias in the methodology section. Reviewer Comment: The statistical analysis is robust, employing partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) with bootstrapping. The authors present clear evidence of mediation effects, reinforcing the claim that social empowerment partially mediates the relationship between perceived social support and life satisfaction. However, the moderation analysis results are less conclusive, with decision-making showing an insignificant moderating effect while external communication exhibits a significant impact. The interpretation of these findings could be expanded to explore why decision-making did not exert a moderating influence, especially given the broader discourse on women’s empowerment and autonomy. Authors Response: Thank you for the suggestions. We have responded positively to the concern raised in the discussion section. Reviewer Comments: One notable strength of the study is its focus on external communication as a moderating variable, an aspect often overlooked in similar research. The findings suggest that higher levels of external communication strengthen the relationship between perceived social support and life satisfaction. However, the study could have further interrogated the mechanisms underlying this effect. For instance, does external communication facilitate access to better resources, enhance self-efficacy, or contribute to greater community engagement? Addressing these aspects would enhance the study’s explanatory power. Author Response: We have addressed this concern in the discussion section. The discussion and implications section aligns with the study’s objectives, providing practical recommendations for policymakers, self-help group managers, and social workers. The emphasis on fostering external communication to enhance life satisfaction is particularly valuable. However, the study could benefit from a more critical engagement with policy implications. While it advocates for increased social support initiatives, it does not sufficiently address structural barriers such as gender norms, economic constraints, and institutional limitations that may impede the effectiveness of such interventions. Author Response: Thank you for the suggestions. We have addressed this concern positively in the limitations section. Reviewer Comments: Despite its contributions, the study has limitations that should have been more explicitly acknowledged. The cross-sectional design restricts the ability to infer causality, and while the authors suggest longitudinal studies for future research, they do not outline a clear methodological framework for how such studies could be conducted. Additionally, qualitative insights from self-help group members could have provided richer contextual understanding and complemented the quantitative findings. Author Response: Thank you for the suggestions. We have addressed this concern positively in the limitations section. Reviewer Comments: Overall, this study makes a meaningful contribution to understanding the dynamics of social support, empowerment, and life satisfaction among women in self-help groups. However, it would benefit from a more critical engagement with theoretical perspectives, a more rigorous discussion of methodological constraints, and a deeper exploration of the mechanisms driving the observed relationships. Author Response: We have incorporated all the changes suggested by the reviewer. Thank you so much for your time and consideration. Reviewer Comments: The conceptual foundation of the study is well-framed within the broader discourse on women’s empowerment, but certain theoretical gaps are apparent. The literature review, though extensive, lacks a nuanced critique of prior studies, particularly concerning methodological limitations and conflicting findings. While multiple references support the claims made, the integration of theoretical perspectives remains relatively superficial. The discussion on the role of social empowerment in enhancing life satisfaction is compelling but does not sufficiently address alternative explanations or counterarguments that could provide a more balanced understanding. Author Response: Thank you for the valuable suggestions. We have addressed the concern positively in the literature section pertaining to social empowerment and life satisfaction. Reviewer Comment: The methodology demonstrates a systematic approach, yet there are notable concerns regarding sampling and data collection. The use of judgmental sampling, while justified for targeting specific demographics, raises questions about selection bias and the generalizability of findings. The study states that 333 participants were surveyed from three self-help groups in Southern Karnataka, India, but does not clarify whether these groups are representative of the broader population of self-help group members across different cultural and socioeconomic contexts. The reliance on self-reported measures, though common in social science research, introduces the potential for social desirability bias, which the study does not explicitly acknowledge or control for. Authors Response: Thank you for the comments. We have acknowledged the social desirability bias in the methodology section. Reviewer Comment: The statistical analysis is robust, employing partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) with bootstrapping. The authors present clear evidence of mediation effects, reinforcing the claim that social empowerment partially mediates the relationship between perceived social support and life satisfaction. However, the moderation analysis results are less conclusive, with decision-making showing an insignificant moderating effect while external communication exhibits a significant impact. The interpretation of these findings could be expanded to explore why decision-making did not exert a moderating influence, especially given the broader discourse on women’s empowerment and autonomy. Authors Response: Thank you for the suggestions. We have responded positively to the concern raised in the discussion section. Reviewer Comments: One notable strength of the study is its focus on external communication as a moderating variable, an aspect often overlooked in similar research. The findings suggest that higher levels of external communication strengthen the relationship between perceived social support and life satisfaction. However, the study could have further interrogated the mechanisms underlying this effect. For instance, does external communication facilitate access to better resources, enhance self-efficacy, or contribute to greater community engagement? Addressing these aspects would enhance the study’s explanatory power. Author Response: We have addressed this concern in the discussion section. The discussion and implications section aligns with the study’s objectives, providing practical recommendations for policymakers, self-help group managers, and social workers. The emphasis on fostering external communication to enhance life satisfaction is particularly valuable. However, the study could benefit from a more critical engagement with policy implications. While it advocates for increased social support initiatives, it does not sufficiently address structural barriers such as gender norms, economic constraints, and institutional limitations that may impede the effectiveness of such interventions. Author Response: Thank you for the suggestions. We have addressed this concern positively in the limitations section. Reviewer Comments: Despite its contributions, the study has limitations that should have been more explicitly acknowledged. The cross-sectional design restricts the ability to infer causality, and while the authors suggest longitudinal studies for future research, they do not outline a clear methodological framework for how such studies could be conducted. Additionally, qualitative insights from self-help group members could have provided richer contextual understanding and complemented the quantitative findings. Author Response: Thank you for the suggestions. We have addressed this concern positively in the limitations section. Reviewer Comments: Overall, this study makes a meaningful contribution to understanding the dynamics of social support, empowerment, and life satisfaction among women in self-help groups. However, it would benefit from a more critical engagement with theoretical perspectives, a more rigorous discussion of methodological constraints, and a deeper exploration of the mechanisms driving the observed relationships. Author Response: We have incorporated all the changes suggested by the reviewer. Thank you so much for your time and consideration. Competing Interests: There are no competing interest to disclose. Close Report a concern Respond or Comment COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT Author Response 08 Mar 2025 SATISH KUMAR , Department of Commerce, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, India 08 Mar 2025 Author Response Reviewer Comments: The conceptual foundation of the study is well-framed within the broader discourse on women’s empowerment, but certain theoretical gaps are apparent. The literature review, though extensive, lacks a ... Continue reading Reviewer Comments: The conceptual foundation of the study is well-framed within the broader discourse on women’s empowerment, but certain theoretical gaps are apparent. The literature review, though extensive, lacks a nuanced critique of prior studies, particularly concerning methodological limitations and conflicting findings. While multiple references support the claims made, the integration of theoretical perspectives remains relatively superficial. The discussion on the role of social empowerment in enhancing life satisfaction is compelling but does not sufficiently address alternative explanations or counterarguments that could provide a more balanced understanding. Author Response: Thank you for the valuable suggestions. We have addressed the concern positively in the literature section pertaining to social empowerment and life satisfaction. Reviewer Comment: The methodology demonstrates a systematic approach, yet there are notable concerns regarding sampling and data collection. The use of judgmental sampling, while justified for targeting specific demographics, raises questions about selection bias and the generalizability of findings. The study states that 333 participants were surveyed from three self-help groups in Southern Karnataka, India, but does not clarify whether these groups are representative of the broader population of self-help group members across different cultural and socioeconomic contexts. The reliance on self-reported measures, though common in social science research, introduces the potential for social desirability bias, which the study does not explicitly acknowledge or control for. Authors Response: Thank you for the comments. We have acknowledged the social desirability bias in the methodology section. Reviewer Comment: The statistical analysis is robust, employing partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) with bootstrapping. The authors present clear evidence of mediation effects, reinforcing the claim that social empowerment partially mediates the relationship between perceived social support and life satisfaction. However, the moderation analysis results are less conclusive, with decision-making showing an insignificant moderating effect while external communication exhibits a significant impact. The interpretation of these findings could be expanded to explore why decision-making did not exert a moderating influence, especially given the broader discourse on women’s empowerment and autonomy. Authors Response: Thank you for the suggestions. We have responded positively to the concern raised in the discussion section. Reviewer Comments: One notable strength of the study is its focus on external communication as a moderating variable, an aspect often overlooked in similar research. The findings suggest that higher levels of external communication strengthen the relationship between perceived social support and life satisfaction. However, the study could have further interrogated the mechanisms underlying this effect. For instance, does external communication facilitate access to better resources, enhance self-efficacy, or contribute to greater community engagement? Addressing these aspects would enhance the study’s explanatory power. Author Response: We have addressed this concern in the discussion section. The discussion and implications section aligns with the study’s objectives, providing practical recommendations for policymakers, self-help group managers, and social workers. The emphasis on fostering external communication to enhance life satisfaction is particularly valuable. However, the study could benefit from a more critical engagement with policy implications. While it advocates for increased social support initiatives, it does not sufficiently address structural barriers such as gender norms, economic constraints, and institutional limitations that may impede the effectiveness of such interventions. Author Response: Thank you for the suggestions. We have addressed this concern positively in the limitations section. Reviewer Comments: Despite its contributions, the study has limitations that should have been more explicitly acknowledged. The cross-sectional design restricts the ability to infer causality, and while the authors suggest longitudinal studies for future research, they do not outline a clear methodological framework for how such studies could be conducted. Additionally, qualitative insights from self-help group members could have provided richer contextual understanding and complemented the quantitative findings. Author Response: Thank you for the suggestions. We have addressed this concern positively in the limitations section. Reviewer Comments: Overall, this study makes a meaningful contribution to understanding the dynamics of social support, empowerment, and life satisfaction among women in self-help groups. However, it would benefit from a more critical engagement with theoretical perspectives, a more rigorous discussion of methodological constraints, and a deeper exploration of the mechanisms driving the observed relationships. Author Response: We have incorporated all the changes suggested by the reviewer. Thank you so much for your time and consideration. Reviewer Comments: The conceptual foundation of the study is well-framed within the broader discourse on women’s empowerment, but certain theoretical gaps are apparent. The literature review, though extensive, lacks a nuanced critique of prior studies, particularly concerning methodological limitations and conflicting findings. While multiple references support the claims made, the integration of theoretical perspectives remains relatively superficial. The discussion on the role of social empowerment in enhancing life satisfaction is compelling but does not sufficiently address alternative explanations or counterarguments that could provide a more balanced understanding. Author Response: Thank you for the valuable suggestions. We have addressed the concern positively in the literature section pertaining to social empowerment and life satisfaction. Reviewer Comment: The methodology demonstrates a systematic approach, yet there are notable concerns regarding sampling and data collection. The use of judgmental sampling, while justified for targeting specific demographics, raises questions about selection bias and the generalizability of findings. The study states that 333 participants were surveyed from three self-help groups in Southern Karnataka, India, but does not clarify whether these groups are representative of the broader population of self-help group members across different cultural and socioeconomic contexts. The reliance on self-reported measures, though common in social science research, introduces the potential for social desirability bias, which the study does not explicitly acknowledge or control for. Authors Response: Thank you for the comments. We have acknowledged the social desirability bias in the methodology section. Reviewer Comment: The statistical analysis is robust, employing partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) with bootstrapping. The authors present clear evidence of mediation effects, reinforcing the claim that social empowerment partially mediates the relationship between perceived social support and life satisfaction. However, the moderation analysis results are less conclusive, with decision-making showing an insignificant moderating effect while external communication exhibits a significant impact. The interpretation of these findings could be expanded to explore why decision-making did not exert a moderating influence, especially given the broader discourse on women’s empowerment and autonomy. Authors Response: Thank you for the suggestions. We have responded positively to the concern raised in the discussion section. Reviewer Comments: One notable strength of the study is its focus on external communication as a moderating variable, an aspect often overlooked in similar research. The findings suggest that higher levels of external communication strengthen the relationship between perceived social support and life satisfaction. However, the study could have further interrogated the mechanisms underlying this effect. For instance, does external communication facilitate access to better resources, enhance self-efficacy, or contribute to greater community engagement? Addressing these aspects would enhance the study’s explanatory power. Author Response: We have addressed this concern in the discussion section. The discussion and implications section aligns with the study’s objectives, providing practical recommendations for policymakers, self-help group managers, and social workers. The emphasis on fostering external communication to enhance life satisfaction is particularly valuable. However, the study could benefit from a more critical engagement with policy implications. While it advocates for increased social support initiatives, it does not sufficiently address structural barriers such as gender norms, economic constraints, and institutional limitations that may impede the effectiveness of such interventions. Author Response: Thank you for the suggestions. We have addressed this concern positively in the limitations section. Reviewer Comments: Despite its contributions, the study has limitations that should have been more explicitly acknowledged. The cross-sectional design restricts the ability to infer causality, and while the authors suggest longitudinal studies for future research, they do not outline a clear methodological framework for how such studies could be conducted. Additionally, qualitative insights from self-help group members could have provided richer contextual understanding and complemented the quantitative findings. Author Response: Thank you for the suggestions. We have addressed this concern positively in the limitations section. Reviewer Comments: Overall, this study makes a meaningful contribution to understanding the dynamics of social support, empowerment, and life satisfaction among women in self-help groups. However, it would benefit from a more critical engagement with theoretical perspectives, a more rigorous discussion of methodological constraints, and a deeper exploration of the mechanisms driving the observed relationships. Author Response: We have incorporated all the changes suggested by the reviewer. Thank you so much for your time and consideration. Competing Interests: There are no competing interest to disclose. Close Report a concern COMMENT ON THIS REPORT Views 0 Cite How to cite this report: Turpo-Chaparro JE. Reviewer Report For: Measuring life satisfaction of self-help groups: Role of perceived social support and social empowerment [version 2; peer review: 3 approved, 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved] . F1000Research 2025, 14 :101 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.162492.r365390 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/14-101/v1#referee-response-365390 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. Close Copy Citation Details Reviewer Report 18 Feb 2025 Josue Edison Turpo-Chaparro , Universidad Peruana Union, Lima District, Lima Region, Peru Not Approved VIEWS 0 https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.162492.r365390 1. Explain in the introduction with example how self-help groups empower people economically. 2. It is important to frame the main theory under which the study is being carried out 3. When it comes to almost all cultural, ... Continue reading READ ALL 1. Explain in the introduction with example how self-help groups empower people economically. 2. It is important to frame the main theory under which the study is being carried out 3. When it comes to almost all cultural, social and political contexts, women face discrimination, it could be clearer. Are you specifically describing an Asian context? 4. It is important that in the introduction or in the literature review you place the concepts of the variables you are using 5. In the methodology, although 333 people are included, it would be useful to know the total population 6. When you mention 63% that they were married, does that mean they were legally married or were some couples cohabiting? 7. In the data collection process, although it is specified that approval was obtained from the ethics committee, it is necessary to specify what the criteria were for excluding minors since it is possible that some women could have participated as minors but legally married. 8. In relation to the instruments used, clearly state whether these were adapted or translated 9. Specify what psychometric properties the instruments used have. 10. Specify the test of normality of the data, if this was through the Standard Deviation and Kurtosis or if it was through another test 11. It is necessary to place the practical aspects of the research in the discussion 12. In the discussion place the theoretical implications 13. It is important that the sample be placed in the limitation, since the type of sampling used has disadvantages and it is necessary to propose future studies 14. Place an additional limitation on self-reports used in research Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature? Partly Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound? Partly Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? Partly If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? Yes Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility? Yes Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results? Yes Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise: Research methodology. Psychometric and bibliometric studies.Organizational psychology I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to state that I do not consider it to be of an acceptable scientific standard, for reasons outlined above. Close READ LESS CITE CITE HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT Turpo-Chaparro JE. Reviewer Report For: Measuring life satisfaction of self-help groups: Role of perceived social support and social empowerment [version 2; peer review: 3 approved, 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved] . F1000Research 2025, 14 :101 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.162492.r365390 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/14-101/v1#referee-response-365390 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS Report a concern Respond or Comment COMMENT ON THIS REPORT Comments on this article Comments (0) Version 2 VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 17 Jan 2025 ADD YOUR COMMENT Comment keyboard_arrow_left keyboard_arrow_right Open Peer Review Reviewer Status info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions Reviewer Reports Invited Reviewers 1 2 3 4 5 Version 2 (revision) 06 Mar 25 read read read read Version 1 17 Jan 25 read read Josue Edison Turpo-Chaparro , Universidad Peruana Union, Lima District, Peru Andika Pratama , Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Indonesia; Universitas Sriwijaya (Ringgold ID: 175522), Palembang, Indonesia Navya Gubbi Sateeshchandra , Berlin School of Business and Innovation, Berlin, Germany Nikhil Sapre , University of Bristol Business School, Bristol, UK Virginia Barba-Sánchez , Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Albacete, Spain Comments on this article All Comments (0) Add a comment Sign up for content alerts Sign Up You are now signed up to receive this alert Browse by related subjects keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports Reviewer Report 0 Views copyright © 2025 Barba-Sánchez V. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 10 Jul 2025 | for Version 2 Virginia Barba-Sánchez , ENSITMA R.G., Department of Business Science, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Albacete, Spain 0 Views copyright © 2025 Barba-Sánchez V. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. format_quote Cite this report speaker_notes Responses (0) Approved With Reservations info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions Thank you for the opportunity to review the manuscript ‘Measuring life satisfaction of self-help groups: Role of perceived social support and social empowerment’ submitted to F1000Research. I enjoyed reading the manuscript and found it to be an informative study of factors that affect the life satisfaction of self-help groups. Overall, the research addresses the relevant topic and takes as a starting point some questions that require further investigation. These research questions should be developed in a theoretical and conceptual framework. Empirical analysis has been carried out to provide evidence for research questions, but their research hypotheses are wrongly formulated, since readers need not know what a mediating and/or moderating effect is. I would highly recommend that the authors rewrite the hypotheses. The results are appropriately interpreted and discussed. So, the manuscript has potential, but the reasoning does not flow naturally. The paper must be improved in line with the comments below: The last three sentences of the abstract are superfluous in the summary; however, it would be good to specify the implications of the study. Regarding the Introduction, the first two paragraphs need to be enhanced with more arguments exemplifying the importance of life satisfaction and this research. There is a lot of published work, such as Barba-Sanchez et al. (2024) (Ref 1), to strengthen the narrative on this. In the introduction, it is very worthwhile to introduce readers in more detail to the social and cultural context in southern Karnataka. Section 2 should integrate the hypotheses. Please rewrite the hypotheses. In section 2, you introduce the theoretical framework, but it is a succession of empirical works without theoretical cohesion. Please explain. The sample has been chosen to demonstrate that it is representative of the society being studied. We would also recommend adding a table with accurate information about the technical specifications of the study and another table with the comparative demographics between the population and sample. Please specify the different items used to compose the different measurements. It could incorporate them in one simplified table, which shows a list of items used to measure each of the hypotheses. Why aren’t control variables used? Please add the Conbrach’s Alpha and the HTMT0.85 criteria in Table 1. Please add an endogeneity study to ensure that no important variables are missing from the model. An article must be self-contained, i.e. it must contain all the information necessary for its comprehension. In this sense, please add the direct effect, t-value, p-value, percentile confidence interval (PCI), and f 2 in Table 2. Please add the total effect and indirect effect, t-value, VAF, and percentile confidence interval (PCI) in Table 3. In addition, please add a new table with the moderation effects of decision-making and external communication. Please note that your proposed model corresponds to Hayes's (2015) case number 58. The conclusion and discussion sections lack significant theoretical references to the findings. We hope you find the above comments useful and we wish you the best of luck with developing the paper further. Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature? Partly Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound? Partly Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? Partly If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? Partly Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility? Yes Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results? Yes References 1. Barba-Sánchez V, Salinero Y, Jiménez Estévez P, Ruiz-Palomino P: How entrepreneurship drives life satisfaction among people with intellectual disabilities (PwID): a mixed-method approach. Management Decision . 2024; 62 (2): 426-449 Publisher Full Text 2. Hayes A: An Index and Test of Linear Moderated Mediation. Multivariate Behavioral Research . 2015; 50 (1): 1-22 Publisher Full Text Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise Measuring social value, Entrepreneurship, Structural equations. I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above. reply Respond to this report Responses (0) Barba-Sánchez V. Peer Review Report For: Measuring life satisfaction of self-help groups: Role of perceived social support and social empowerment [version 2; peer review: 3 approved, 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved] . F1000Research 2025, 14 :101 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.179008.r371650) NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/14-101/v2#referee-response-371650 keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports Reviewer Report 0 Views copyright © 2025 Sapre N. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 08 Apr 2025 | for Version 2 Nikhil Sapre , University of Bristol Business School, Bristol, UK 0 Views copyright © 2025 Sapre N. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. format_quote Cite this report speaker_notes Responses (0) Approved info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions This study examines the life satisfaction of women in self help groups in Southern India. The literature review critically evaluates recent studies leading to six well developed hypotheses. Appropriate and robust empirical methods have been employed. The discussion situates the results in the broader literature and makes sound policy recommendations. Concerns around the sample and research design raised on the first submission, have been sufficiently addressed in the current version. Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature? Yes Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound? Yes Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? Yes If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? Yes Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility? Yes Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results? Yes Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise Banking, Social Finance I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. reply Respond to this report Responses (0) Sapre N. Peer Review Report For: Measuring life satisfaction of self-help groups: Role of perceived social support and social empowerment [version 2; peer review: 3 approved, 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved] . F1000Research 2025, 14 :101 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.179008.r371644) NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/14-101/v2#referee-response-371644 keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports Reviewer Report 0 Views copyright © 2025 Sateeshchandra N. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 26 Mar 2025 | for Version 2 Navya Gubbi Sateeshchandra , Berlin School of Business and Innovation, Berlin, Berlin, Germany 0 Views copyright © 2025 Sateeshchandra N. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. format_quote Cite this report speaker_notes Responses (0) Approved info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions The article highlights how life satisfaction is impacted by a perceived social support and social empowerment. The study is significant in the field of social science and helpful to other researchers. The researchers have made an effort not only to examine the direct relationships but also to explore how mediators influence the connection. Perceived social support and social empowerment is an important factor in life satisfaction. The title of the article attracts interested scholars and practitioners. The author has made efforts to address the importance of social support and women empowerment by exploring the complex relationship between social support and life satisfaction. Further, the findings of the study can help policy makers to develop strategies towards women empowerment and improve life satisfaction of self-help group members. The robust methodology ensures an insightful understanding by making the purpose of the study evident and valuable for various practitioners, NGO's and policy makers. In this context, I approve this article without any revisions. Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature? Yes Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound? Yes Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? Yes If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? Yes Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility? Yes Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results? Yes Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise Economics, institutional Economics, Public Policy, Sustainable Development I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. reply Respond to this report Responses (0) Sateeshchandra NG. Peer Review Report For: Measuring life satisfaction of self-help groups: Role of perceived social support and social empowerment [version 2; peer review: 3 approved, 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved] . F1000Research 2025, 14 :101 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.179008.r371647) NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/14-101/v2#referee-response-371647 keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports Reviewer Report 0 Views copyright © 2025 Pratama A. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 14 Mar 2025 | for Version 2 Andika Pratama , Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Indonesia; Community Education, Universitas Sriwijaya (Ringgold ID: 175522), Palembang, South Sumatra, Indonesia 0 Views copyright © 2025 Pratama A. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. format_quote Cite this report speaker_notes Responses (0) Approved info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions Having carefully assessed the revisions made to the manuscript, I am pleased to confirm that the authors have satisfactorily addressed the concerns raised in my previous review. The incorporation of an acknowledgement of social desirability bias within the methodology section, along with a more detailed explanation of why decision-making does not moderate the relationship between social support and life satisfaction, significantly enhances the clarity and robustness of the study. Furthermore, the expanded discussion on the role of external communication and the delineation of barriers to policy intervention provide a more comprehensive understanding of the findings. Given these improvements, I find the revised manuscript sufficiently aligned with the required standards and am happy to amend my previous status of Approved with reservations to Approved. Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise I am a researcher and practitioner in the fields of social work, community education, and community empowerment. My expertise enables me to rigorously evaluate scholarly research, ensuring that studies contribute meaningfully to academic discourse I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. reply Respond to this report Responses (0) Pratama A. Peer Review Report For: Measuring life satisfaction of self-help groups: Role of perceived social support and social empowerment [version 2; peer review: 3 approved, 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved] . F1000Research 2025, 14 :101 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.179008.r369751) NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/14-101/v2#referee-response-369751 keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports Reviewer Report 0 Views copyright © 2025 Pratama A. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 27 Feb 2025 | for Version 1 Andika Pratama , Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Indonesia; Community Education, Universitas Sriwijaya (Ringgold ID: 175522), Palembang, South Sumatra, Indonesia 0 Views copyright © 2025 Pratama A. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. format_quote Cite this report speaker_notes Responses (1) Approved With Reservations info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions The article, \" Measuring Life Satisfaction of Self-Help Groups: Role of Perceived Social Support and Social Empowerment ,\" presents a relevant and contemporary analysis of the interplay between perceived social support, social empowerment, and life satisfaction among women members of self-help groups. While the study contributes to the existing body of literature on social empowerment and its psychological and social benefits, several critical aspects warrant closer examination. The conceptual foundation of the study is well-framed within the broader discourse on women’s empowerment, but certain theoretical gaps are apparent. The literature review, though extensive, lacks a nuanced critique of prior studies, particularly concerning methodological limitations and conflicting findings. While multiple references support the claims made, the integration of theoretical perspectives remains relatively superficial. The discussion on the role of social empowerment in enhancing life satisfaction is compelling but does not sufficiently address alternative explanations or counterarguments that could provide a more balanced understanding. The methodology demonstrates a systematic approach, yet there are notable concerns regarding sampling and data collection. The use of judgmental sampling, while justified for targeting specific demographics, raises questions about selection bias and the generalizability of findings. The study states that 333 participants were surveyed from three self-help groups in Southern Karnataka, India, but does not clarify whether these groups are representative of the broader population of self-help group members across different cultural and socioeconomic contexts. The reliance on self-reported measures, though common in social science research, introduces the potential for social desirability bias, which the study does not explicitly acknowledge or control for. The statistical analysis is robust, employing partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) with bootstrapping. The authors present clear evidence of mediation effects, reinforcing the claim that social empowerment partially mediates the relationship between perceived social support and life satisfaction. However, the moderation analysis results are less conclusive, with decision-making showing an insignificant moderating effect while external communication exhibits a significant impact. The interpretation of these findings could be expanded to explore why decision-making did not exert a moderating influence, especially given the broader discourse on women’s empowerment and autonomy. One notable strength of the study is its focus on external communication as a moderating variable, an aspect often overlooked in similar research. The findings suggest that higher levels of external communication strengthen the relationship between perceived social support and life satisfaction. However, the study could have further interrogated the mechanisms underlying this effect. For instance, does external communication facilitate access to better resources, enhance self-efficacy, or contribute to greater community engagement? Addressing these aspects would enhance the study’s explanatory power. The discussion and implications section aligns with the study’s objectives, providing practical recommendations for policymakers, self-help group managers, and social workers. The emphasis on fostering external communication to enhance life satisfaction is particularly valuable. However, the study could benefit from a more critical engagement with policy implications. While it advocates for increased social support initiatives, it does not sufficiently address structural barriers such as gender norms, economic constraints, and institutional limitations that may impede the effectiveness of such interventions. Despite its contributions, the study has limitations that should have been more explicitly acknowledged. The cross-sectional design restricts the ability to infer causality, and while the authors suggest longitudinal studies for future research, they do not outline a clear methodological framework for how such studies could be conducted. Additionally, qualitative insights from self-help group members could have provided richer contextual understanding and complemented the quantitative findings. Overall, this study makes a meaningful contribution to understanding the dynamics of social support, empowerment, and life satisfaction among women in self-help groups. However, it would benefit from a more critical engagement with theoretical perspectives, a more rigorous discussion of methodological constraints, and a deeper exploration of the mechanisms driving the observed relationships. Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature? Partly Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound? Yes Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? Yes If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? Partly Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility? Yes Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results? Partly Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise I am a researcher and practitioner in the fields of social work, community education, and community empowerment. My expertise enables me to rigorously evaluate scholarly research, ensuring that studies contribute meaningfully to academic discourse I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above. reply Respond to this report Responses (1) Author Response 08 Mar 2025 SATISH KUMAR, Department of Commerce, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, India Reviewer Comments: The conceptual foundation of the study is well-framed within the broader discourse on women’s empowerment, but certain theoretical gaps are apparent. The literature review, though extensive, lacks a nuanced critique of prior studies, particularly concerning methodological limitations and conflicting findings. While multiple references support the claims made, the integration of theoretical perspectives remains relatively superficial. The discussion on the role of social empowerment in enhancing life satisfaction is compelling but does not sufficiently address alternative explanations or counterarguments that could provide a more balanced understanding. Author Response: Thank you for the valuable suggestions. We have addressed the concern positively in the literature section pertaining to social empowerment and life satisfaction. Reviewer Comment: The methodology demonstrates a systematic approach, yet there are notable concerns regarding sampling and data collection. The use of judgmental sampling, while justified for targeting specific demographics, raises questions about selection bias and the generalizability of findings. The study states that 333 participants were surveyed from three self-help groups in Southern Karnataka, India, but does not clarify whether these groups are representative of the broader population of self-help group members across different cultural and socioeconomic contexts. The reliance on self-reported measures, though common in social science research, introduces the potential for social desirability bias, which the study does not explicitly acknowledge or control for. Authors Response: Thank you for the comments. We have acknowledged the social desirability bias in the methodology section. Reviewer Comment: The statistical analysis is robust, employing partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) with bootstrapping. The authors present clear evidence of mediation effects, reinforcing the claim that social empowerment partially mediates the relationship between perceived social support and life satisfaction. However, the moderation analysis results are less conclusive, with decision-making showing an insignificant moderating effect while external communication exhibits a significant impact. The interpretation of these findings could be expanded to explore why decision-making did not exert a moderating influence, especially given the broader discourse on women’s empowerment and autonomy. Authors Response: Thank you for the suggestions. We have responded positively to the concern raised in the discussion section. Reviewer Comments: One notable strength of the study is its focus on external communication as a moderating variable, an aspect often overlooked in similar research. The findings suggest that higher levels of external communication strengthen the relationship between perceived social support and life satisfaction. However, the study could have further interrogated the mechanisms underlying this effect. For instance, does external communication facilitate access to better resources, enhance self-efficacy, or contribute to greater community engagement? Addressing these aspects would enhance the study’s explanatory power. Author Response: We have addressed this concern in the discussion section. The discussion and implications section aligns with the study’s objectives, providing practical recommendations for policymakers, self-help group managers, and social workers. The emphasis on fostering external communication to enhance life satisfaction is particularly valuable. However, the study could benefit from a more critical engagement with policy implications. While it advocates for increased social support initiatives, it does not sufficiently address structural barriers such as gender norms, economic constraints, and institutional limitations that may impede the effectiveness of such interventions. Author Response: Thank you for the suggestions. We have addressed this concern positively in the limitations section. Reviewer Comments: Despite its contributions, the study has limitations that should have been more explicitly acknowledged. The cross-sectional design restricts the ability to infer causality, and while the authors suggest longitudinal studies for future research, they do not outline a clear methodological framework for how such studies could be conducted. Additionally, qualitative insights from self-help group members could have provided richer contextual understanding and complemented the quantitative findings. Author Response: Thank you for the suggestions. We have addressed this concern positively in the limitations section. Reviewer Comments: Overall, this study makes a meaningful contribution to understanding the dynamics of social support, empowerment, and life satisfaction among women in self-help groups. However, it would benefit from a more critical engagement with theoretical perspectives, a more rigorous discussion of methodological constraints, and a deeper exploration of the mechanisms driving the observed relationships. Author Response: We have incorporated all the changes suggested by the reviewer. Thank you so much for your time and consideration. View more View less Competing Interests There are no competing interest to disclose. reply Respond Report a concern Pratama A. Peer Review Report For: Measuring life satisfaction of self-help groups: Role of perceived social support and social empowerment [version 2; peer review: 3 approved, 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved] . F1000Research 2025, 14 :101 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.162492.r363968) NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/14-101/v1#referee-response-363968 keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports Reviewer Report 0 Views copyright © 2025 Turpo-Chaparro J. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 18 Feb 2025 | for Version 1 Josue Edison Turpo-Chaparro , Universidad Peruana Union, Lima District, Lima Region, Peru 0 Views copyright © 2025 Turpo-Chaparro J. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. format_quote Cite this report speaker_notes Responses (0) Not Approved info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions 1. Explain in the introduction with example how self-help groups empower people economically. 2. It is important to frame the main theory under which the study is being carried out 3. When it comes to almost all cultural, social and political contexts, women face discrimination, it could be clearer. Are you specifically describing an Asian context? 4. It is important that in the introduction or in the literature review you place the concepts of the variables you are using 5. In the methodology, although 333 people are included, it would be useful to know the total population 6. When you mention 63% that they were married, does that mean they were legally married or were some couples cohabiting? 7. In the data collection process, although it is specified that approval was obtained from the ethics committee, it is necessary to specify what the criteria were for excluding minors since it is possible that some women could have participated as minors but legally married. 8. In relation to the instruments used, clearly state whether these were adapted or translated 9. Specify what psychometric properties the instruments used have. 10. Specify the test of normality of the data, if this was through the Standard Deviation and Kurtosis or if it was through another test 11. It is necessary to place the practical aspects of the research in the discussion 12. In the discussion place the theoretical implications 13. It is important that the sample be placed in the limitation, since the type of sampling used has disadvantages and it is necessary to propose future studies 14. Place an additional limitation on self-reports used in research Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature? Partly Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound? Partly Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? Partly If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? Yes Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility? Yes Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results? Yes Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise Research methodology. Psychometric and bibliometric studies.Organizational psychology I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to state that I do not consider it to be of an acceptable scientific standard, for reasons outlined above. reply Respond to this report Responses (0) Turpo-Chaparro JE. Peer Review Report For: Measuring life satisfaction of self-help groups: Role of perceived social support and social empowerment [version 2; peer review: 3 approved, 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved] . F1000Research 2025, 14 :101 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.162492.r365390) NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/14-101/v1#referee-response-365390 Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions Adjust parameters to alter display View on desktop for interactive features Includes Interactive Elements View on desktop for interactive features Competing Interests Policy Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list: Examples of 'Non-Financial Competing Interests' Within the past 4 years, you have held joint grants, published or collaborated with any of the authors of the selected paper. You have a close personal relationship (e.g. parent, spouse, sibling, or domestic partner) with any of the authors. You are a close professional associate of any of the authors (e.g. scientific mentor, recent student). You work at the same institute as any of the authors. You hope/expect to benefit (e.g. favour or employment) as a result of your submission. You are an Editor for the journal in which the article is published. Examples of 'Financial Competing Interests' You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, any of the following from any commercial organisation that may gain financially from your submission: a salary, fees, funding, reimbursements. You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, shared grant support or other funding with any of the authors. You hold, or are currently applying for, any patents or significant stocks/shares relating to the subject matter of the paper you are commenting on. Stay Updated Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles Register with F1000Research Already registered? Sign in Not now, thanks close PLEASE NOTE If you are an AUTHOR of this article, please check that you signed in with the account associated with this article otherwise we cannot automatically identify your role as an author and your comment will be labelled as a “User Comment”. If you are a REVIEWER of this article, please check that you have signed in with the account associated with this article and then go to your account to submit your report, please do not post your review here. If you do not have access to your original account, please contact us . All commenters must hold a formal affiliation as per our Policies . The information that you give us will be displayed next to your comment. User comments must be in English, comprehensible and relevant to the article under discussion. We reserve the right to remove any comments that we consider to be inappropriate, offensive or otherwise in breach of the User Comment Terms and Conditions . Commenters must not use a comment for personal attacks. When criticisms of the article are based on unpublished data, the data should be made available. I accept the User Comment Terms and Conditions Please confirm that you accept the User Comment Terms and Conditions. Affiliation ✕ refresh Please enter your institution. Note: To add your institution or organisation, start typing the name and then select the correct name from the list. Where applicable, the name will appear in both the original language and in English. Do not paste in the name. If the name does not appear in the drop-down list, we will display the information you have entered. ✕ refresh Country/Region * USA UK Canada China France Germany Afghanistan Aland Islands Albania Algeria American Samoa Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Indian Ocean Territory British Virgin Islands Brunei Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cape Verde Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia Comoros Congo Cook Islands Costa Rica Cote d'Ivoire Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Democratic Republic of the Congo Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands Faroe Islands Federated States of Micronesia Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guam Guatemala Guernsey Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti Heard Island and Mcdonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jersey Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Kosovo (Serbia and Montenegro) Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macao Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Minor Outlying Islands of the United States Moldova Monaco Mongolia Montenegro Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands Antilles New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island North Korea North Macedonia Northern Mariana Islands Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Palestinian Territory Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Reunion Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Helena Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Pierre and Miquelon Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Georgia and the South Sandwich Is South Korea South Sudan Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syria Taiwan Tajikistan Tanzania Thailand The Gambia The Netherlands Timor-Leste Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu UK USA Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United States Virgin Islands Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela Vietnam Wallis and Futuna West Bank and Gaza Strip Western Sahara Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe Please select your country/region. You must enter a comment. Competing Interests Please disclose any competing interests that might be construed to influence your judgment of the article's or peer review report's validity or importance. Competing Interests Policy Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list: Examples of 'Non-Financial Competing Interests' Within the past 4 years, you have held joint grants, published or collaborated with any of the authors of the selected paper. You have a close personal relationship (e.g. parent, spouse, sibling, or domestic partner) with any of the authors. You are a close professional associate of any of the authors (e.g. scientific mentor, recent student). You work at the same institute as any of the authors. You hope/expect to benefit (e.g. favour or employment) as a result of your submission. You are an Editor for the journal in which the article is published. Examples of 'Financial Competing Interests' You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, any of the following from any commercial organisation that may gain financially from your submission: a salary, fees, funding, reimbursements. You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, shared grant support or other funding with any of the authors. You hold, or are currently applying for, any patents or significant stocks/shares relating to the subject matter of the paper you are commenting on. Please state your competing interests The comment has been saved. An error has occurred. Please try again. Cancel Post var lTitle = \"Measuring life satisfaction of self-help...\".replace(\"'\", ''); var linkedInUrl = \"http://www.linkedin.com/shareArticle?url=https://f1000research.com/articles/14-101/v2\" + \"&title=\" + encodeURIComponent(lTitle) + \"&summary=\" + encodeURIComponent('Read the article by '); var deliciousUrl = \"https://del.icio.us/post?url=https://f1000research.com/articles/14-101/v2&title=\" + encodeURIComponent(lTitle); var redditUrl = \"http://reddit.com/submit?url=https://f1000research.com/articles/14-101/v2\" + \"&title=\" + encodeURIComponent(lTitle); linkedInUrl += encodeURIComponent('Suvarna S et al.'); var offsetTop = /chrome/i.test( navigator.userAgent ) ? 4 : -10; var addthis_config = { ui_offset_top: offsetTop, services_compact : \"facebook,twitter,www.linkedin.com,www.mendeley.com,reddit.com\", services_expanded : \"facebook,twitter,www.linkedin.com,www.mendeley.com,reddit.com\", services_custom : [ { name: \"LinkedIn\", url: linkedInUrl, icon:\"/img/icon/at_linkedin.svg\" }, { name: \"Mendeley\", url: \"http://www.mendeley.com/import/?url=https://f1000research.com/articles/14-101/v2/mendeley\", icon:\"/img/icon/at_mendeley.svg\" }, { name: \"Reddit\", url: redditUrl, icon:\"/img/icon/at_reddit.svg\" }, ] }; var addthis_share = { url: \"https://f1000research.com/articles/14-101\", templates : { twitter : \"Measuring life satisfaction of self-help groups: Role of perceived.... Suvarna S et al., published by \" + \"@F1000Research\" + \", https://f1000research.com/articles/14-101/v2\" } }; if (typeof(addthis) != \"undefined\"){ addthis.addEventListener('addthis.ready', checkCount); addthis.addEventListener('addthis.menu.share', checkCount); } $(\".f1r-shares-twitter\").attr(\"href\", \"https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=\" + addthis_share.templates.twitter); $(\".f1r-shares-facebook\").attr(\"href\", \"https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=\" + addthis_share.url); $(\".f1r-shares-linkedin\").attr(\"href\", addthis_config.services_custom[0].url); $(\".f1r-shares-reddit\").attr(\"href\", addthis_config.services_custom[2].url); $(\".f1r-shares-mendelay\").attr(\"href\", addthis_config.services_custom[1].url); function checkCount(){ setTimeout(function(){ $(\".addthis_button_expanded\").each(function(){ var count = $(this).text(); if (count !== \"\" && count != \"0\") $(this).removeClass(\"is-hidden\"); else $(this).addClass(\"is-hidden\"); }); }, 1000); } close How to cite this report {{reportCitation}} Cancel Copy Citation Details $(function(){R.ui.buttonDropdowns('.dropdown-for-downloads');}); $(function(){R.ui.toolbarDropdowns('.toolbar-dropdown-for-downloads');}); $.get(\"/articles/acj/148209/179008\") new F1000.Clipboard(); new F1000.ThesaurusTermsDisplay(\"articles\", \"article\", \"179008\"); $(document).ready(function() { $( \"#frame1\" ).on('load', function() { var mydiv = $(this).contents().find(\"div\"); var h = mydiv.height(); console.log(h) }); var tooltipLivingFigure = jQuery(\".interactive-living-figure-label .icon-more-info\"), titleLivingFigure = tooltipLivingFigure.attr(\"title\"); tooltipLivingFigure.simpletip({ fixed: true, position: [\"-115\", \"30\"], baseClass: 'small-tooltip', content:titleLivingFigure + \" \" }); tooltipLivingFigure.removeAttr(\"title\"); $(\"body\").on(\"click\", \".cite-living-figure\", function(e) { e.preventDefault(); var ref = $(this).attr(\"data-ref\"); $(this).closest(\".living-figure-list-container\").find(\"#\" + ref).fadeIn(200); }); $(\"body\").on(\"click\", \".close-cite-living-figure\", function(e) { e.preventDefault(); $(this).closest(\".popup-window-wrapper\").fadeOut(200); }); $(document).on(\"mouseup\", function(e) { var metricsContainer = $(\".article-metrics-popover-wrapper\"); if (!metricsContainer.is(e.target) && metricsContainer.has(e.target).length === 0) { $(\".article-metrics-close-button\").click(); } }); var articleId = $('#articleId').val(); if($(\"#main-article-count-box\").attachArticleMetrics) { $(\"#main-article-count-box\").attachArticleMetrics(articleId, { articleMetricsView: true }); } }); var figshareWidget = $(\".new_figshare_widget\"); if (figshareWidget.length > 0) { window.figshare.load(\"f1000\", function(Widget) { // Select a tag/tags defined in your page. In this tag we will place the widget. _.map(figshareWidget, function(el){ var widget = new Widget({ articleId: $(el).attr(\"figshare_articleId\") //height:300 // this is the height of the viewer part. [Default: 550] }); widget.initialize(); // initialize the widget widget.mount(el); // mount it in a tag that's on your page // this will save the widget on the global scope for later use from // your JS scripts. This line is optional. //window.widget = widget; }); }); } close Error Close Add Reset F1000.MICROSERVICES.AFFILIATION = ''; $(document).ready(function () { $('.js-affiliations-form').each((index, form) => { new AffiliationForm({ formId: form.id, institutionErrorSelector: '.comment-enter-institution', departmentErrorSelector: '.comment-enter-department', placeSelector: '.js-add-comment-place', stateSelector: '.js-add-comment-state', zipCodeSelector: '.js-add-comment-zipcode', countrySelector: '.js-add-comment-country', countryErrorSelector: '.comment-enter-country', }); }); }); $(document).ready(function () { var reportIds = { \"360973\": 0, \"360972\": 0, \"360975\": 0, \"360974\": 0, \"360971\": 0, \"360980\": 0, \"360977\": 0, \"360976\": 0, \"360979\": 0, \"360978\": 0, \"363965\": 0, \"371645\": 0, \"371644\": 9, \"363967\": 0, \"371647\": 28, \"363966\": 0, \"371646\": 0, \"371643\": 0, \"363973\": 0, \"363972\": 0, \"371652\": 0, \"363974\": 0, \"363969\": 0, \"371649\": 0, \"363968\": 27, \"371648\": 0, \"363971\": 0, \"371651\": 0, \"363970\": 0, \"371650\": 10, \"362573\": 0, \"365389\": 0, \"362572\": 0, \"365388\": 0, \"362575\": 0, \"365391\": 0, \"365390\": 28, \"362574\": 0, \"362569\": 0, \"362568\": 0, \"362571\": 0, \"365387\": 0, \"362570\": 0, \"365386\": 0, \"369751\": 17, \"362577\": 0, \"365393\": 0, \"362576\": 0, \"365392\": 0, \"365395\": 0, \"365394\": 0, \"369752\": 0, \"370549\": 0, \"370548\": 0, \"370551\": 0, \"370550\": 0, \"370557\": 0, \"370556\": 0, \"370553\": 0, \"370552\": 0, \"370555\": 0, \"370554\": 0, }; $(\".referee-response-container,.js-referee-report\").each(function(index, el) { var reportId = $(el).attr(\"data-reportid\"), reportCount = reportIds[reportId] || 0; $(el).find(\".comments-count-container,.js-referee-report-views\").html(reportCount); }); var uuidInput = $(\"#article_uuid\"), oldUUId = uuidInput.val(), newUUId = \"0ea755e7-e6a7-464c-be64-d6d48f1cf3b1\"; uuidInput.val(newUUId); $(\"a[href*='article_uuid=']\").each(function(index, el) { var newHref = $(el).attr(\"href\").replace(oldUUId, newUUId); $(el).attr(\"href\", newHref); }); }); An innovative open access publishing platform offering rapid publication and open peer review, whilst supporting data deposition and sharing. Browse Gateways Collections How it Works Contact For Developers Cookie Notice Privacy Notice RSS Submit Your Research Follow us © 2012-2026 F1000 Research Ltd. ISSN 2046-1402 | Legal | Partner of Research4Life • CrossRef • ORCID • FAIRSharing R.templateTests.simpleTemplate = R.template(' $text $text $text $text $text '); R.templateTests.runTests(); var F1000platform = new F1000.Platform({ name: \"f1000research\", displayName: \"F1000Research\", hostName: \"f1000research.com\", id: \"1\", editorialEmail: \"research@f1000.com\", infoEmail: \"info@f1000.com\", usePmcStats: true }); $(function(){R.ui.dropdowns('.dropdown-for-authors, .dropdown-for-about, .dropdown-for-myresearch');}); // $(function(){R.ui.dropdowns('.dropdown-for-referees');}); $(document).ready(function () { if ($(\".cookie-warning\").is(\":visible\")) { $(\".sticky\").css(\"margin-bottom\", \"35px\"); $(\".devices\").addClass(\"devices-and-cookie-warning\"); } $(\".cookie-warning .close-button\").click(function (e) { $(\".devices\").removeClass(\"devices-and-cookie-warning\"); $(\".sticky\").css(\"margin-bottom\", \"0\"); }); $(\"#tweeter-feed .tweet-message\").each(function (i, message) { var self = $(message); self.html(linkify(self.html())); }); $(\".partner\").on(\"mouseenter mouseleave\", function() { $(this).find(\".gray-scale, .colour\").toggleClass(\"is-hidden\"); }); }); <!-- Sign in --> Sign In Remember me Forgotten your password? Sign In Cancel Email or password not correct. Please try again Please wait... $(function(){ // Note: All the setup needs to run against a name attribute and *not* the id due the clonish // nature of facebox... $(\"a[id=googleSignInButton]\").click(function(event){ event.preventDefault(); $(\"input[id=oAuthSystem]\").val(\"GOOGLE\"); $(\"form[id=oAuthForm]\").submit(); }); $(\"a[id=facebookSignInButton]\").click(function(event){ event.preventDefault(); $(\"input[id=oAuthSystem]\").val(\"FACEBOOK\"); $(\"form[id=oAuthForm]\").submit(); }); $(\"a[id=orcidSignInButton]\").click(function(event){ event.preventDefault(); $(\"input[id=oAuthSystem]\").val(\"ORCID\"); $(\"form[id=oAuthForm]\").submit(); }); }); If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password. The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000. Email address not valid, please try again You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password. To sign in, please click here . If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here . You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password. To sign in, please click here . If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here . Code not correct, please try again Reset password Cancel Email us for further assistance. Server error, please try again. If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password. If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance. Please wait... Register $(document).ready(function () { signIn.createSignInAsRow($(\"#sign-in-form-gfb-popup\")); $(\".target-field\").each(function () { var uris = $(this).val().split(\"/\"); if (uris.pop() === \"login\") { $(this).val(uris.toString().replace(\",\",\"/\")); } }); });","source_license":"CC-BY-4.0","license_restricted":false}