{"paper_id":"4bc89501-ddb9-401c-ba45-e5ce493cc45f","body_text":"Menstrual disorders are common in women of reproductive age 1 . Menstrual pain, is one of such disorders and it happens to be the commonest gynaecological disorder in this group. 2  Most authors use menstrual pain interchangeably with dysmenorrhoea. However, some others have proposed dysmenorrhoea to be menstrual pain severe enough to cause functional incapacitation or seeking treatment or suggest it's a clinical diagnosis based on History on examination findings by a Physician. 1\nDysmenorrhoea can either be primary or secondary. Primary dysmenorrhoea is painful menses (of varying severity) usually beginning in adolescence in women with normal pelvic anatomy. It is characterized by cramping pelvic pain beginning shortly after the onset of menses and lasting one to three days. 1 – 3  When an identifiable organ pathology is present, dysmenorrhea is termed secondary. The most common cause of secondary dysmenorrhoea is endometriosis. Other causes include leiomyoma, adenomyosis, ovarian cysts and pelvic congestions. 4\nProstaglandin-induced increase in uterine activity was first hypothesized as a cause of dysmenorrhoea in 1932. Though the pathophysiology of menstrual pain has not been fully understood, current evidence suggests that prostaglandin F2α, a potent myometrial stimulant and vasoconstrictor, is produced by the secretory endometrium. This substance causes a decrease in myometrial blood flow and induces contraction in order to shed the endothelium in the menstrual phase of the menstrual cycle. 1 – 3\nNotably, primary dysmenorrhea is far more common than its secondary counterpart. Though severely dilapidating in some cases, dysmenorrhea still remains a widely under-diagnosed condition. This is partly due to common societal beliefs regarding lack of effective treatments and expectations about the burden of menstruation — as its expected that it should be endured. 1\nThe prevalence of dysmenorrhea among females have been studied by different workers. Consistently in literature, 20–90% of females of reproductive age experience menstrual pain 5 , 6 . Furthermore, these variations in prevalence depend on several factors which we will discuss in this paper.\nVarious risk factors have been described to influence dysmenorrhea and its severity. These include early menarche, Body Mass Index (BMI), Dietary habits, family history, amongst others 3 , 5 , 7 .\nIn Ghana, very few studies have discussed the burden of dysmenorrhea among females, and those available focus on the adolescent age group. Our study is an attempt to describe the pattern and risk factors for dysmenorrhea among University students.\n\nThe study was descriptive cross-sectional study involving two hundred female undergraduate students drawn from various faculties of the University of Cape Coast, Ghana. Data was collected using a pretested questionnaire to elicit variables of interest and menstrual pain was assessed using standardized Pain scales gotten from research done by other workers. Furthermore, Ethical waiver was granted by the UCC Ethical Review Board before the study. The questionnaire, however, included a consent section in which the respondent appended her signature after the aims and objectives of the study were explained. Assurance of participant's confidentiality was considered and the report included exactly what the respondent gave. No words or images that could depict or reveal the identity of the respondents was included in the study report.\nData gathered were carefully coded and entered into Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20. Chi-square analysis was used to test the association between the variables of interest, in this case the risk factors of dysmenorrhea (see  Table 3 ). Simple t0test, followed by a multivariant regression was used to determine the p values of risk factors that predict severe dysmenorrhea. Inference was made using 95% confidence interval with 5% error margin and a p-value < 0.05 was considered significant.\nRisk factors for dysmenorrhoea among the respondents\np<0.05 is statistically significant.\nMP: Menstrual pain, BMI: Body Mass Index\nUndergraduate female students >18 years\nGhanaian by birth\nFemales belonging to any one of the colleges of the UCC.\nUndergraduate females\nPrevious diagnosis of Secondary dysmenorrhea (PID, fibroid, endometriosis or genital tuberculosis)\nRecent delivery or Miscarriage (Voluntary or Spontaneous) in the last 6 weeks\nVerbal multidimensional scoring system for assessment of dysmenorrhoea severity was used in this study as it has been shown to be objective in assessing severity of dysmenorrhoea. This tool defines the severity of dysmenorrhea based on the table below 13\n\nMost respondents had mild (41.5%) and moderate (43.5%) menstrual pain. Only 14.3% of respondents' experienced severe dysmenorrhoea. Severity of dysmenorrhea was determined by the verbal multidimensional scoring system for dysmenorrhoea.\nSevere dysmenorr hea was more common in those that attained menarche at the age of 12 years. Average age of menarche was 12+0.12\n\nThis study demonstrated for the first time (by quantitative analysis), in a Ghanaian Tertiary Institution, the burden of dysmenorrhea among female undergraduate students.\nFrom our study, the prevalence of dysmenorrhea was 74% (see  Table 4 ). This finding is consistent with a similar study among secondary school students in Ghana 8 . Result from this study is also in agreement with Nigerian 9 , 10 , Iranian 11 , Lebanese 12 , Turkish studies 13 .\nMenstrual symptoms associated with the increasing severity of dysmenorrhoea\np<0.05 is statistically significant for increased severity of dysmenorrhea\nIt was however in sharp contrast with result by Japanese (15.8%) 14 , another Lebanese (26.8%) 15 , Iranian (38.1%),6 Gambian (14%) 16 and Georgian (52%) 17  workers. Higher prevalence was seen in studies by Seven et al. (84.9%)18, Amaza et al. (87.6%) 19 , and the highest was 97% in an Australian survey 20 .\nThe reasons suggested for these wide variations in prevalence are numerous. Some of these include: stricter definition of dysmenorrhea, ethnic differences, the method employed in assessing dysmenorrhea (including chronological age of the respondents) and presence of premenstrual syndrome. 8 . 14 , 17 . 21  Some researchers have also suggested that studies in older females are less consistent in reporting prevalence. 22\nPain beginning at the onset of menses, lasting for 1 – 2 days observed in this study (see  Table 2 ) has also been reported in other studies; this is characteristic of dysmenorrhea. 8 , 18\nCharacteristics of Menstrual pain\nVerbal multidimensional scoring system for assessment of dysmenorrhoea severity was used in this study as it has been shown to be objective in assessing severity of dysmenorrhoea 13 . The prevalence of mild, moderate and severe dysmenorrhoea in this study was 41.5% 43.5% and 14.3% respectively (see  figure 2 ).\nAge of menarche (expressed in years) in relation to severity of dysmenorrhoea among respondents\nMore than half (57.8%) the respondents described their pain to be moderate to severe. This is similar to the 52% observed by Jerry et al 23 .\nThe prevalence rate of 14.3% observed in this study for severe dysmenorrhoea is similar to a report by Harlow et al 24  and other studies 19 , 22 . This value is slightly only less than other available Ghanaian study (18.8%)8. A Nigerian study puts the prevalence of severe dysmenorrhoea as 66% among adolescent girls. 7  Severe dysmenorrhea was 6.23% in another study 25 . Cultural differences in pain perception and individual differences in pain threshold are possible reasons for this difference. 26 , 25\nHaving a female relative with dysmenorrhea significantly increased the likelihood of having severe dysmenorrhoea in this study (see  Table 4 ). This again is consistent with available literature thus suggesting that genetics may play a role in prevalence and severity of dysmenorrhoea3,22. Some researchers hypothesize that dysmenorrhea in families is related to conditioned behaviour that is learned from mother or sisters for the possibility of societal reward or that control for pain exists. 1 , 22  Similar living patterns and lifestyles in the families is another possibility 27 .\nThe presence of a heavy menstrual flow ( Table 4 ) was another risk factor for determining the severity of dysmenorrhoea. The current thinking is that it is associated with an increase in concentration of circulating prostaglandins, which in turn increase the severity of menstrual pain. 1 , 2 , 3  Alcohol use, smoking and higher body mass index have been identified as risk factor for the severity and prevalence of dysmenorrhoea 22 . These were not so in this study (see  Table 4 ) and some other studies. 2 , 18 , 21\nWe concur with Ju et al  22 . 30  who suggested that mixed results have been observed for many of the risk factors for dysmenorrhoea, though no reason was given immediately for this.\nMenstrual characteristics of females are known to be risk factors for dysmenorrhoea. It is generally postulated that dysmenorrhoea begins 6–12 months after menarche, peaking during the late teens and early twenties 11 . Thereafter, its prevalence and severity then declines gradually with age influenced partly by increasing parity in later years of a woman's life. 2 , 11  This study showed no significant relationship between the chronological age, parity of the respondents and the prevalence and severity of dysmenorrhoea (see  table 4 ). The reason for this deviation from what is generally presumed is immediately not known.\nWe however wish to point out some interesting findings. Though a younger population was used in the other Ghanaian study8, their prevalence rate was just about the same with this present study and a Nigerian study 28 . Meanwhile, a Hong Kong 29  and Nigerian study 19  with similar study population to this study reported a higher prevalence (80%, 87% respectively). Yet another Nigerian7 and Georgian study5 with a younger (adolescent) population had much lower prevalence rate of dysmenorrhoea (64.3%, 52% respectively).\nCeteris paribus, these latter studies should have reported higher prevalence rate to the present study like the Australian study 20 , 29  as a lower prevalence rate perhaps ought to have been obtained in this study just as the Lebanese study with similar age of respondents to ours. 15  Furthermore, Nigerian 2 , Georgian, 5  Lebanese 12  and studies found a negative association between age and dysmenorrhoea while an Italian study found a positive relationship between age and dysmenorrhea. 30  The statistically insignificant effect of chronological age on prevalence of dysmenorrhea in this present study tallies with result from French 31 , Lebanese 17  and a Hong Kong studies 29 .\nIt can therefore be inferred that the relationship between the chronological age of females and the prevalence of dysmenorrhoea may be more complex than we think and generalization of results from epidemiologic studies should be done with caution.\nMost of the undergraduate students recruited in this study were in their early twenties ( Table 1 ), this is in variance with the average age observed in the other Ghanaian study involving adolescents and similar to a Nigerian study 2. The average age of menarche was 12.7+ 0.12 years with a range of 7–17 years ( Figure 1 ). This is in agreement with findings in Nigerian and Ghanaian studies 7 , 8 . Higher age of menarche has been observed by others. 2 , 21\nDemographic characteristics of respondents\nSeverity of Menstrual Pain\nThe age of menarche did not correlate with having dysmenorrhoea in the present study (see  Table 4 ). Unsal et al. 13 , Okoro et al. 2  and Gumanga 8  findings were consistent with this. Other studies however showed a correlation between age of menarche and dysmenorrhoea. 22\nDysmenorrhea is associated with other menstrual symptoms. In a study among adolescent girls, they described these symptoms as negative menstrual experiences 13 . The commonest associated symptoms with menses are shown in  table 4 . The trend is similar to reports by other workers 13 , 18 . In this study, about 80% of respondents with mood changes during menses had dysmenorrhoea (not shown) and it significantly predicted the severity of dysmenorrhea, along with dizziness, loss of appetite, diarrhoea and fatigue ( table 3 ).\nAlso, it was established in this study that severe dysmenorrhoea was associated with heavy menstrual flow ( table 4 ). The resulting anaemia from menorrohagia may be the reason for the dizziness, fatigue and anorexia experienced by the females especially those with severe dysmenorrhoea. Prostaglandins do not only stimulate uterine contractions during menses, they can cause contraction of bowel smooth muscle resulting in nausea and vomiting17 as observed also observed in this study ( table 3 ).\nWe have put the prevalence of menstrual pain in Ghana at 74% in a previous study 31 . The impact of dysmenorrhea on the activities of female undergraduates including student absenteeism and poor academic performance have also been documented 32 . Unfortunately, despite the high use of analgesics in our previous work, pain control was sub-optimal 33 .\nIndeed, dysmenorrhea, especially when severe has adverse consequences that ought not to be overlooked. Patients should be managed on individualistic basis. Hence, the need for widespread public education to encourage females with dysmenorrhoea to seek medical care. Healthcare workers' attitude to patients who report with dysmenorrhea should also be humane so as to encourage them to seek treatment, especially when it is severe.","source_license":"CC-BY-4.0","license_restricted":false}