{"paper_id":"49b7e072-1be9-487c-8bda-0dc0b44c8c9f","body_text":"Uterine leiomyomas, commonly known as fibroids, are benign monoclonal tumors arising from the smooth muscle cells of the myometrium.\nThey represent the most prevalent pelvic neoplasm in premenopausal women, with an estimated cumulative incidence of over 70% by the age\nof 50 [ 1 ]. While many fibroids remain asymptomatic, approximately 20-50% of affected women\nexperience significant symptoms that can profoundly impair their physical, social and emotional well-being [ 2 ].\nThe clinical presentation of uterine fibroids is highly variable and depends on their number, size and location within the uterus. Common\nsymptoms include heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB), which can lead to anemia; chronic pelvic pain or pressure; dysmenorrhea; and\nbulk-related symptoms such as urinary frequency and constipation [ 3 ]. Furthermore, fibroids,\nparticularly those that distort the uterine cavity submucosal or are intramural, have been implicated in reproductive dysfunction,\nincluding infertility, recurrent pregnancy loss and adverse obstetric outcomes [ 4 ]. The\nmanagement of symptomatic fibroids is tailored to the individual, considering factors such as symptom severity, patient age, desire for\nfuture fertility and proximity to menopause. Treatment modalities range from expectant management and medical therapies (e.g., hormonal\ncontraceptives, gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists) to more definitive procedural interventions [ 5 ].\nSurgical options remain the mainstay for patients with severe symptoms or those who have failed medical management. Myomectomy, the\nsurgical removal of fibroids while preserving the uterus, is the preferred option for women who wish to retain their fertility.\nHysterectomy, the complete removal of the uterus, provides a definitive cure for fibroid-related symptoms and is typically reserved for\nwomen who have completed childbearing [ 6 ]. Numerous studies have investigated the epidemiology\nand clinical impact of uterine fibroids globally. However, presentation patterns and management choices can vary across different\ngeographical and socio-economic populations due to genetic predispositions, healthcare access and cultural factors [ 7 ].\nWhile the fundamental pathophysiology is understood, a significant research gap exists in the form of updated, institution-specific\ndata that reflects current clinical practice and outcomes. Such localized data is essential for auditing clinical services, refining\ntreatment protocols and providing accurate patient counseling. Therefore, it is of interest to evaluate the clinicopathological\npresentation patterns and surgical management outcomes of uterine fibroids in patients treated at our tertiary care institution.\n\nThis was a retrospective, descriptive, record-based Study at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radha Devi Jageshwari\nMemorial Medical College and Hospital, Dr. Kalam Nagar, Manariya Chhajan, Turki, Muzaffarpur, Bihar, India.\n\nThe study included the medical records of all patients who underwent surgical intervention (myomectomy or hysterectomy) for a primary\ndiagnosis of uterine fibroids between two years. A total of 60 patient records that met the inclusion criteria were selected for the\nfinal analysis through a non-probability, purposive sampling technique.\n\n(1) women aged between 18 and 50 years; (2) a pre-operative diagnosis of uterine fibroids confirmed by transvaginal or transabdominal\nultrasonography; (3) surgical management via abdominal myomectomy or total abdominal hysterectomy; and (4) a postoperative histopathological\nconfirmation of leiomyoma.\n\n(1) patients with a co-existing diagnosis of adenomyosis, endometriosis, or pelvic inflammatory disease that was the primary\nindication for surgery; (2) suspected or confirmed uterine or cervical malignancy; (3) management with minimally invasive techniques\nsuch as laparoscopy, hysteroscopy, or uterine artery embolization; and (4) medical records with incomplete clinical or follow-up data.\n\nA pre-designed, structured data collection proforma was used to extract information from the hospital's electronic health records and\nphysical case files.\n\n[1] Demographic data: Age at surgery, parity.\n[2] Clinical presentation: Chief complaints (heavy menstrual bleeding, dysmenorrhea, pelvic pain/pressure, infertility, palpable\nabdominal mass).\n[3] Diagnostic findings: Pre-operative hemoglobin levels, findings from pelvic ultrasonography, including the number of fibroids\n(single, multiple), location (subserosal, intramural, submucosal) and the size of the dominant fibroid.\n[4] Surgical and postoperative data: Type of surgical procedure performed (myomectomy or hysterectomy), intraoperative findings,\npostoperative histopathology report, duration of hospital stay, occurrence of any immediate postoperative complications (e.g., hemorrhage,\nfever, wound infection) and symptom status at the 6-month follow-up visit.\n\nThe collected data were coded and entered into a spreadsheet (Microsoft Excel 2019) and subsequently analyzed using the Statistical\nPackage for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 26.0. Descriptive statistics were calculated for all variables. Continuous data (e.g.,\nage, fibroid size) were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD), while categorical data (e.g., symptoms, fibroid location)\nwere presented as frequencies and percentages (%). The Student's t-test was used to compare the means of continuous variables between\nthe myomectomy and hysterectomy groups. The Chi-square (χ 2 ) test or Fisher's exact test, where appropriate, was used to\ncompare categorical variables. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.\n\nA total of 60 patients who underwent surgery for uterine fibroids were included in the analysis. The baseline demographic and\nclinical presentation details are summarized in Table 1 (see PDF). The mean age of the study population was 38.5 ± 6.2 years,\nwith an age range of 18 to 50 years. The majority of patients were multiparous (63.3%). The most common presenting symptom was heavy\nmenstrual bleeding (HMB), reported by 45 patients (75.0%). This was followed by pelvic pain or pressure symptoms, which were present in\n32 patients (53.3%). A significant proportion of women also reported dysmenorrhea (46.7%). Primary or secondary infertility was the\nchief complaint in 10 patients (16.7%). The ultrasonographic and histopathological characteristics of the fibroids are shown in\nTable 2 (see PDF). Multiple fibroids were more common than single fibroids, found in 40 patients (66.7%). The mean size of the dominant\nfibroid was 8.2 ± 3.1 cm. In terms of location, intramural fibroids were the most frequent type, identified in 36 patients\n(60.0%) and followed by subserosal fibroids (33.3%). Surgical management consisted of myomectomy for 40 patients (66.7%) and hysterectomy\nfor 20 patients (33.3%). A comparison of the two surgical groups is presented in Table 3 (see PDF). There was a statistically significant\ndifference in the mean age between the two groups, with patients undergoing myomectomy being considerably younger than those undergoing\nhysterectomy (35.1 ± 4.8 vs. 45.3 ± 5.1 years, p < 0.001). At the 6-month postoperative follow-up, complete symptom\nresolution was achieved in 33 of 40 (82.5%) myomectomy patients and 19 of 20 (95.0%) hysterectomy patients. This difference was found to\nbe on the border of statistical significance (p=0.048). The overall rate of short-term postoperative complications was 13.3% (8 out of\n60 patients). There was no significant difference in the complication rates between the myomectomy and hysterectomy groups (12.5% vs.\n15.0%, p=0.812).\n\nThis retrospective study provides a snapshot of the clinical profile and surgical management outcomes of uterine fibroids at our\ninstitution. The findings confirm that fibroids are a significant cause of gynecological morbidity, predominantly affecting women in\ntheir late reproductive years, with a mean age of 38.5 years in our cohort. This demographic is consistent with reports from other\nstudies, which place the peak incidence in the fourth and fifth decades of life [ 8 ]. The most\nprevalent symptom identified in our study was heavy menstrual bleeding (75.0%), a finding that aligns with the majority of the existing\nliterature [ 2 ,  7 ]. The high frequency of HMB is\nmechanistically linked to the presence of intramural and submucosal fibroids, which were the most common types in our cohort. These\nfibroids can increase the endometrial surface area, cause vascular disruption and impair normal uterine contractility, leading to\nexcessive bleeding [ 9 ]. The significant proportion of patients with anemia (41.7%) secondary to\nHMB underscores the substantial impact of this symptom on women's health. The choice of surgical management in our study was clearly\ndelineated by patient age and, by extension, the desire for fertility preservation. Patients who underwent myomectomy were, on average,\na decade younger and more likely to be nulliparous compared to those who opted for hysterectomy. This reflects appropriate clinical\ndecision-making, where uterus-sparing surgery is prioritized for women who have not completed their families, while hysterectomy is\noffered as a definitive treatment for older women with severe symptoms [ 6 ,  10 ].\nIn terms of outcomes, both surgical procedures were highly effective in providing symptom relief. The rate of complete symptom resolution\nwas slightly higher in the hysterectomy group (95.0%) compared to the myomectomy group (82.5%). This is an expected outcome, as\nhysterectomy eliminates the source of the symptoms and precludes any possibility of fibroid recurrence, thereby offering a definitive\ncure [ 11 ,  12 - 13 ].\nSimilarly, Madunatu  et al.  in 2024 documented that intramural fibroids were the most common subtype and that\nhysterectomy resulted in higher symptom resolution compared to myomectomy in a 5-year Nigerian cohort, which closely aligns with the\nfindings of the present study [ 14 ]. The small number of patients in the myomectomy group who did\nnot experience complete resolution may have had residual small fibroids, co-existing adenomyosis, or other contributing factors.\nImportantly, our study found no statistically significant difference in the rates of short-term postoperative complications between\nabdominal myomectomy and hysterectomy. This suggests that both procedures, when performed in a tertiary care setting by experienced\nsurgeons, carry a comparable and acceptable level of surgical risk. This finding is crucial for patient counseling, as it allows\nclinicians to reassure women opting for myomectomy that the procedure is not inherently more dangerous than a hysterectomy in the\nimmediate postoperative period [ 15 ,  16 ,\n 17 - 18 ]. This study is subject to several limitations\ninherent to its design. The retrospective nature introduces the possibility of information bias and reliance on the accuracy and\ncompleteness of medical records. The small sample size of 60 patients limits the statistical power of our comparative analyses and the\ngeneralizability of our findings. Furthermore, this study only captured short-term outcomes at 6 months; it does not provide data on\nlong-term fibroid recurrence rates after myomectomy or long-term quality of life improvements, which are critical aspects of fibroid\nmanagement.\n\nUterine fibroids commonly present with heavy menstrual bleeding and bulk-related symptoms in women in their late 30s and 40s. The\nfindings of this study confirm that surgical management, tailored to the patient's age and reproductive goals, is a highly effective\ntreatment strategy. Myomectomy serves as a safe and effective uterus-preserving option for younger women, while hysterectomy provides a\ndefinitive cure for those who have completed childbearing, with both procedures demonstrating comparable short-term safety profiles.\nThis local data reinforces established clinical guidelines and highlights the importance of individualized patient counseling to achieve\noptimal outcomes in the management of symptomatic uterine fibroids.","source_license":"CC-BY-4.0","license_restricted":false}