{"paper_id":"46fe9b39-dd1d-4663-b326-57a3f03f2f85","body_text":"Abstract\nEndometriosis and ovarian endometrioma (OMA) cause dysmenorrhea and infertility. Current hormonal therapies for OMA treatment, may exhibit limited effectiveness. Hormonal treatments function by downregulate estrogen receptors (ERs) via progesterone receptor (PR) signaling; therefore, progestins are used for the treatment of endometriosis. Dienogest (DNG), an oral progestin, is highly selective for PRs. Previously we identified the association of azurocidin with DNG resistance. Herein, we aimed to examine the effect of azurocidin on OMAs and its clinical significance. We examined the effect of azurocidin on PR or ER and the action of DNG on the inflammatory cytokines IL-6 and IL-8 in OMAs used the human immortalized endometriotic epithelial Emosis-CC/TERT1 cell line, and measured azurocidin levels in human biological samples. DNG inhibited IL-6 and IL-8 production in vitro, which was suppressed in the presence of azurocidin. Additionally, the inflammatory cytokines IL-6 and IL-8 enhanced azurocidin production. Furthermore, azurocidin induced ER expression; the proliferation of EMosis-CC/TERT1 cells increased significantly upon incubation with 17β-estradiol and azurocidin. Overall, azurocidin inhibits the action of DNG by increasing estrogen sensitivity via promoting ER expression and endometriosis. Azurocidin concentrations in the blood and urine were higher in patients resistant to DNG therapy than in other patients. Thus, azurocidin may be associated with DNG resistance in OMAs.\nSimilar content being viewed by others\nData Availability\nThe datasets used and analysed in the current study are from the corresponding author on reasonable request.\nCode Availability\nNot applicable.\nReferences\nBrown J, Farquhar C. An overview of treatments for endometriosis. JAMA. 2015;313:296–7.\nUnited Nations Population Division. Contraceptive use by method 2019: data booklet. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/3849735?v=pdf. Accessed 7 Feb 2020.\nGrandi G, Mueller M, Bersinger N, Cangnacci A, Volpe A, McKinnon B. Does dienogest influence the inflammatory response of endometriotic cells? A systematic review. Inflamm Res. 2016;65:183–92.\nVercellini P, Buggio L, Berlanda N, Barbara G, Somigliana E, Bosari S. Estrogen-progestins and progestins for the management of endometriosis. Feritil Steril. 2016;106:1552–71.\nHarada T, Taniguchi F. Dienogest: a new therapeutic agent for the treatment of endometriosis. Women’s Health. 2010;6:27–35.\nSasagawa S, Shimizu Y, Kami H, Takeuchi T, Mita S, Imada K, Kato S, Mizuguchi K. Dienogest is a selective progesterone receptor agonist in transactivation analysis with potent oral endometrial activity due to its efficient pharmacokinetic profile. Steroids. 2008;73:222–31.\nAdachi K, Takahashi K, Nakamura K, Otake A, Sasamoto N, Miyoshi Y, Shoji M, Yoshimatsu Y, Fujirani M, Wakimoto A, Tokuhira A, Kobayashi E, Yoshimura A, Sawada K, Kimura T. Postoperative administration of dienogest for suppressing recurrence of disease and relieving pain in subjects with ovarian endometriomas. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2016;32:646–9.\nMomoeda M, Harada T, Terakawa N, Aso T, Fukunaga M, Hagino H, Taketani Y. Long-term use of dienogest for the treatment of endometriosis. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2009;35:1069–79.\nSasagawa S, Shimizu Y, Nagaoka T, Tokado H, Imada K, Mizuguchi K. Dienogest, a selective progestin, reduces plasma estradiol level through induction of apoptosis of granulosa cells in the ovarian dominant follicle without follicle-stimulating hormone suppression in monkeys. J Endocrinol Invest. 2008;31:636–41.\nMita S, Shimizu Y, Notsu T, Imada K, Kyo S. Dienogest inhibits toll-like receptor 4 expression induced by costimulation of lipopolysaccharide and high-mobility group box 1 in endometrial epithelial cells. Fertil Steril. 2011;96:1485–9.\nHorie S, Harada T, Mitsunari M, Taniguchi F, Iwabe T, Terakawa N. Progesterone and progestational compounds attenuate tumor necrosis factor alpha-induced interleukin-8 production via nuclear factor kappaB inactivation in endometriotic stromal cells. Fertil Steril. 2005;83:1530–5.\nKobayashi Y, Toshiyuki F, Mita S, Watanabe M, Suzuki A. Identification of biomarkers for drug-resistant endometriosis using clinical proteomics. Hum Cell. 2021;34:394–9.\nWatorek W. Azurocidin– inactive serine proteinase homolog acting as multifunctional inflammatory mediator. Acta Biochim Pol. 2003;50:743–52.\nSoehnlein O, Lindbom L. Neutrophil-derived azurocidin alarms the immune system. J Leukoc Biol. 2009;85:344–51.\nNelmpantis D, Gatou A, Fragkioudakis I, Margariti A, Lemonia S, Sakellari D. Azurocidin in gingival crevicular fluid as a potential biomarker of chronic periodontitis. J Periodontal Res. 2020;55:209–2014.\nIpek E, Yolcu M, Yildirim E, Altinkaynak K, Ozbek Sebin S, Kalkan K, Gulcu O, Ermis E, Ozturk M. A novel marker of inflammation: azurocidin in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19:3797.\nBrandt K, Lunedell K, Brismar K. Neutrophil-derived azurocidin cleaves insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-1, -2 and– 4. Growth Horm IGF Res. 2011;21:167–73.\nKlemmt PA, Carver JG, Kennedy SH, Koninckx PR, Mardon HJ. Stromal cells from endometriotic lesions and endometrium from women with endometriosis have reduced decidualization capacity. Fertil Steril. 2006;85:564–72.\nSugita S, Morishita Y, Kano J, Furuya S, Shibata-Ishii A, Noguchi M. IGFBP-1 is expressed specifically in ovarian clear cell adenocarcinoma. Histopathology. 2011;58:729–38.\nKenneth JL, Thomas DS. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2–∆∆CTmethod. Methods. 2001;25:402–8.\nStrober W. Trypan blue exclusion test of cell viability. Curr Protoc Immunol. 2015; 111: A3.B.1-A3.B.3.\nSingh SS, Suen MW. Surgery for endometriosis: beyond medical therapies. Fertil Steril. 2017;107:549–54.\nKoshiba A, Mori T, Okimura H, Akiyama K, Kataoka H, Takaoka O, Ito F, Matsushima H, Kusuki I, Kitawaki J. Dienogest therapy during the early stages of recurrence of endometrioma might be an alternative therapeutic option to avoid repeat surgeries. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2018;44:1970–6.\nChen Y, Pei H, Chang Y, Chen M, Wang H, Xie H, Yao S. The impact endometrioma and laparoscopic cystectomy on ovarian reserve and the exploration of related factors assessed by serum anti-mulllerian hormone: a prospective cohort study. J Ovarian Res. 2014;7:108.\nAndres M, Lopes L, Baracat E, Podgaec S. Dienogest in the treatment of endmetriosis: systematic review. Arch Gynecol Obset. 2015;292:523–9.\nSchweppe KW. Long-term use progestogens– effects on endometriosis, adenomyosis and myomas. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2007;23:17–21.\nBono Y, Kyo S, Takakura M, Maida Y, Mizumoto Y, Nakamura M, Nomura K, Kiyono T, Inoue M. Creation of immortalised epithelial cells from ovarian endometrioma. Br J Cancer. 2012;106:1205–13.\nRasmussen PB, Bjørn S, Hastrup S, Nielsen PF, Norris K, Thim L, Wiberg FC, Flodgaard H. Characterization of recombinant human HBP/CAP37/azurocidin, a pleiotropic mediator of inflammation-enhancing LPS-induced cytokine release from monocytes. FEBS Lett. 1996;390:109–12.\nOkuyama Y, Cho J, Nakajima Y, Homma K, Sekimizu K, Natori S. Binding between azurocidin and calreticulin: its involvement in the activation of peripheral monocytes. J Biochem. 2004;135:171–7.\nLauritzen B, Lykkesfeidt J, Djurup R, Flodgaard H, Svendsen. Effect of heparin-binding protein (CAP37/azurocidin) in a porcine model of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae-induced pneumonia. Pharmacol Res. 2005;51:509–14.\nBurney RO, Giudice LC. Pathogenesis and pathophysiology of endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 2012;98:511–9.\nYilmaz BD, Bulun SE. Endometriosis and nuclear receptors. Hum Reprod Update. 2019;25:473–85.\nPatel B, Elguero S, Thakore S, Dahoud W, Bedaiwy M, Mesiano S. Role of nuclear progesterone receptor isoforms in uterine pathophysiology. Hum Reprod Update. 2015;21:155–73.\nHayashi A, Tanabe A, Kawabe S, Hayashi M, Yuguchi H, Yamashita Y, Okuda K, Ohmichi M. Dienogest increases the progesterone receptor isoform B/A ratio in patients with ovarian endometriosis. J Ovarian Res. 2012;5:31.\nAttia GR, Zeitoun K, Edwards D, Johns A, Carr BR, Bulun SE. Progesterone receptor isoform A but not B is expressed in endometriosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000;85:2897–902.\nMisao R, Iwagaki S, Fujimoto J, Sun W, Tamaya T. Dominant expression of progesterone receptor form B mRNA in ovarian endometriosis. Horm Res. 1999;52:30–4.\nIchioka M, Mita S, Shimizu Y, Imada K, Kiyono T, Bono Y, Kyo S. Dienogest, a synthetic progestin, down-regulates expression of CYP19A1 and inflammatory and neuroangiogenesis factors through progesterone receptor isoforms a and B in endometriotic cells. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2015;147:103–10.\nIgarashi T, Morioka M, Komura A, Nakamura H, Kouso T, Nakamura Y, Tsuruga T, Hayashi M, Liang S, Yamazaki K, Yamada M, Ishida Y. Is endometriosis (endometriosis) lesion epithelial PR down-regulation by genogest associated with clinical efficacy? J Japan Soc Endometr. 2017;38:158–61.\nPatel BG, Rudnicki M, Yu J, Shu Y, Taylor RN. Progesterone resistance in endometriosis: origins, consequences and interventions. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017;96:623–32.\nWu Y, Strawn E, Basir Z, Halverson G, Guo SW. Promoter hypermethylation of progesterone receptor isoform in endometriosis. Epigenetics. 2016;1:106–11.\nZhang P, Wang G. Progesterone resistance in endometriosis: current and putative mechanisms. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24:6992. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24086992.\nAnderson G. Endometriosis pathoetiology and pathophysiology. Roles of vitamin A, estrogen, immunity, adipocytes, gut microbiome and melatonergic pathway on mitochondria regulation. Biomol Concepts. 2019;10:133–49.\nSerdar EB, Diana M, Mary EP, Matthew D, Qing X, Erkut A, Hideki T, Emily JS. Role of estrogen recepter-β in endometriosis. Semin Reprod Med. 2012;30:39–45.\nBulun SE, Endometriosis. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:268–79.\nAcknowledgements\nWe are very grateful to Ms. Manami Ishida for her excellent technical assistance.\nFunding\nThis study was partly supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C), Grant number 18K09236.\nAuthor information\nAuthors and Affiliations\nCorresponding author\nEthics declarations\nEthics Approval\nThe study was approved by our institution’s IRB (IRB No. H28-037_673-03).\nConsent for Publication\nAll authors read the final version of the manuscript and consented to its publication.\nConsent to Participate\nInformed consent was obtained from all participants included in the study.\nCompeting Interests\nThe authors declare no competing interests.\nAdditional information\nPublisher’s Note\nSpringer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.\nRights and permissions\nSpringer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.\nAbout this article\nCite this article\nWatanabe, M., Kobayashi, Y., Ishida, M. et al. Azurocidin is Associated with Dienogest-resistance in Ovarian Endometriotic Cysts. Reprod. Sci. 32, 702–715 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-025-01795-w\nReceived:\nAccepted:\nPublished:\nVersion of record:\nIssue date:\nDOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-025-01795-w","source_license":"public-domain-us","license_restricted":false}