{"paper_id":"4618fc33-4a21-40f2-afa1-39c6c0612ea5","body_text":"Abstract\nObjectives\nTo evaluate the safety, feasibility and imaging outcomes of percutaneous image-guided cryoablation as a minimally invasive treatment for umbilical endometriosis (UE).\nMaterials and methods\nBetween March 2017 and December 2024, 17 women (median age: 38 years; [IQR, 32–38]) underwent percutaneous cryoablation of UE at a single institution. Procedures were performed under ultrasound (US) alone or combined US/CT-scan guidance. Pain severity was assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS), imaging (US and MRI) and cosmetic outcomes were compared before and after treatment. Adverse events were reported according to the Society of Interventional Radiology classification (SIR).\nResults\nMedian lesion volume was 2.42 cm3 [IQR, 0.82–4.70] on US and 2.98 cm3 [IQR, 1.14–5.49] on MRI. 12/17 procedures (70%) were performed under general anesthesia and 16/17 on an outpatient basis (94%). Complete pain relief was achieved in 14/17 patients (82%) at a median follow-up of 22 months [IQR, 12.0–31.0]. The median peak VAS score decreased significantly from 8.0 [IQR, 6.5–9.0] to 0.0 [IQR, 0.0–0.0]; p < 0.001. On MRI, median nodule volume decreased from 2.98 cm3 to 0.90 cm3, representing a median individual reduction of 73.0% [IQR, 39.3–88.4%]. Regarding cosmetic outcomes, 82.4% (14/17) of patients were “satisfied” (score 4) or “very satisfied” (score 5). Three adverse events (17.7%) were recorded, two minor (SIR Grade B; superficial frostbite) and one major (SIR Grade C; surgical debridement).\nConclusion\nPercutaneous image-guided cryoablation appears to be safe and feasible for umbilical endometriosis, offering significant pain relief, substantial nodule volume reduction and satisfactory cosmetic outcomes with predominantly minor adverse events.\nKey Points\nQuestion Umbilical endometriosis causes disabling pain and cosmetic concerns. Surgical excision is invasive and minimally invasive image-guided alternatives with proven efficacy and safety remain lacking.\nFindings Percutaneous cryoablation of umbilical endometriosis achieved durable pain relief (82%), significant nodule reduction (73%), and high cosmetic satisfaction in 82% of patients, with few adverse events, confirming its feasibility and safety.\nClinical relevance Percutaneous cryoablation represents a minimally invasive, outpatient alternative to surgery for umbilical endometriosis, offering durable symptom relief and improved cosmetic outcomes, with low morbidity, potentially improving patients’ quality of life and broadening therapeutic options for this rare entity.\nGraphical Abstract\nSimilar content being viewed by others\nAbbreviations\n- AWE:\n-\nAbdominal wall endometriosis\n- BMI:\n-\nBody mass index\n- CA:\n-\nCryoablation\n- DE:\n-\nDeep pelvic endometriosis\n- dPEI:\n-\nDeep pelvic endometriosis index\n- SIR:\n-\nSociety of Interventional Radiology\n- UE:\n-\nUmbilical endometriosis\n- VAS:\n-\nVisual analog scale\nReferences\nRousset P, Florin M, Bharwani N et al (2023) Deep pelvic infiltrating endometriosis: MRI consensus lexicon and compartment-based approach from the ENDOVALIRM group. Diagn Interv Imaging 104:95–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2022.09.004\nNeto JN, da Costa Brito AI, Nogueira MB et al (2024) Prevalence of depression and anxiety in women with chronic pelvic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 305:312–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.12.042\nTaylor HS, Kotlyar AM, Flores VA (2021) Endometriosis is a chronic systemic disease: clinical challenges and novel innovations. Lancet 397:839–852. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00389-5\nPirš B, Vengušt E, Bokal Vrtačnik E (2024) Characterising umbilical abdominal wall endometriosis as a distinct subgroup of abdominal wall endometriosis—retrospective cohort study. Hum Fertil (Camb) 27:2309389. https://doi.org/10.1080/14647273.2024.2309389\nCarsote M, Terzea DC, Valea A, Gheorghisan-Galateanu A-A (2020) Abdominal wall endometriosis (a narrative review). Int J Med Sci 17:536–542. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijms.38679\nBoesgaard-Kjer D, Boesgaard-Kjer D, Kjer JJ (2017) Primary umbilical endometriosis (PUE). Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 209:44–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.05.030\nDridi D, Chiaffarino F, Parazzini F et al (2022) Umbilical endometriosis: a systematic literature review and pathogenic theory proposal. J Clin Med 11:995. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11040995\nDas A (2019) Umbilical lesions: a cluster of known unknowns and unknown unknowns. Cureus 11:e5309. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.5309\nAllen SE, Rindos NB, Mansuria S (2021) Abdominal wall endometriosis: an update in diagnosis, perioperative considerations and management. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 33:288–295. https://doi.org/10.1097/GCO.0000000000000714\nDridi D, Buggio L, Donati A et al (2022) Clinical features and management of umbilical endometriosis: a 30 years’ monocentric retrospective study. Int J Environ Res Public Health 19:16754. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192416754\nHirata T, Koga K, Kitade M et al (2020) A national survey of umbilical endometriosis in Japan. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 27:80–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2019.02.021\nLi M, Zhang K, Liu C (2025) Primary umbilical endometriosis: clinical aspects and long-term follow-up of five cases. J Int Med Res 53:3000605251317815. https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605251317815\nSuhas AM, Girija S, Sabina I, Manjunath AP (2025) Enhancing aesthetic outcomes in primary umbilical endometriosis: novel four-flap neoumbilicoplasty with case insights and comprehensive literature review. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 51:e16271. https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.16271\nMorsi H, Tallal RES, Youssef T, Youssef Y (2025) Umbilical endometriosis (villar nodule): an uncommon extrapelvic presentation. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 32:856–858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2025.02.003\nTouimi Benjelloun G, Mokbli M, Kammoun T et al (2025) Efficacy and safety of personalized percutaneous single-probe cryoablation using liquid nitrogen in the treatment of abdominal wall endometriosis. J Pers Med 15:373. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15080373\nCornelis F, Havez M, Lippa N et al (2013) Radiologically guided percutaneous cryotherapy for soft tissue tumours: a promising treatment. Diagn Interv Imaging 94:364–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2013.02.001\nCornelis FH, Moyne T, Dohan A (2024) Percutaneous image-guided cryoablation of abdominal wall endometriosis: towards a novel standard of care? Diagn Interv Imaging 105:299–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2024.03.004\nBarat M, Dohan A, Kohi M et al (2024) Treatment of adenomyosis, abdominal wall endometriosis and uterine leiomyoma with interventional radiology: a review of current evidences. Diagn Interv Imaging 105:87–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2023.11.005\nBodard S, Razakamanantsoa L, Geevarghese R et al (2024) Percutaneous cryoablation of abdominal wall endometriosis: a systematic literature review of safety and efficacy. Insights Imaging 15:282. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-024-01823-4\nNajdawi M, Razakamanantsoa L, Mousseaux C et al (2023) Resolution of pain after percutaneous image-guided cryoablation of extraperitoneal endometriosis. J Vasc Interv Radiol 34:1192–1198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2023.03.025\nMarcelin C, Maas P, Jambon E et al (2024) Long-term outcomes after percutaneous cryoablation of abdominal wall endometriosis. Eur Radiol 34:6407–6415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-10689-5\nJouffrieau C, Cazzato RL, Gabriele V et al (2023) Percutaneous imaging-guided cryoablation of endometriosis scars of the anterior abdominal wall. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 30:890–896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2023.06.018\nCazzato RL, Shaygi B, Bertolotti L et al (2025) Percutaneous image-guided cryoablation of endometriosis scars in unusual anatomic locations. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 48:543–550. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-025-04017-7\nBachour R, Sengmanivong N, Vidal F et al (2024) Percutaneous cryoablation of abdominal wall endometriosis: an analysis of 38 patients. Diagn Interv Imaging 105:319–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2024.02.010\nRazakamanantsoa L, Bodard S, Najdawi M et al (2024) Surgical and percutaneous image-guided therapies of abdominal wall endometriosis: a systematic review of current evidence. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 31:726–737.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2024.06.007\nThomassin-Naggara I, Lamrabet S, Crestani A et al (2020) Magnetic resonance imaging classification of deep pelvic endometriosis: description and impact on surgical management. Hum Reprod 35:1589–1600. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deaa103\nThomassin-Naggara I, Monroc M, Chauveau B et al (2023) Multicenter external validation of the deep pelvic endometriosis index magnetic resonance imaging score. JAMA Netw Open 6:e2311686. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.11686\nThomassin-Naggara I, Dolciami M, Chamie LP et al (2025) ESUR consensus MRI for endometriosis: indications, reporting, and classifications. Eur Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-025-11579-0\nThomassin-Naggara I, Dolciami M, Chamie LP et al (2025) ESUR consensus MRI for endometriosis: protocol, lexicon, and compartment-based analysis. Eur Radiol 35:7272–7286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-025-11611-3\nSachs C, Lehnhardt M, Daigeler A, Goertz O (2015) The triaging and treatment of cold-induced injuries. Dtsch Arztebl Int 112:741–747. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2015.0741\nKhalilzadeh O, Baerlocher MO, Shyn PB et al (2017) Proposal of a new adverse event classification by the Society of Interventional Radiology Standards of Practice Committee. J Vasc Interv Radiol 28:1432–1437.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2017.06.019\nSacks D, McClenny TE, Cardella JF, Lewis CA (2003) Society of Interventional Radiology clinical practice guidelines. J Vasc Interv Radiol 14:S199–S202. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.RVI.0000094584.83406.3e\nKaça do Carmo LH, Brito Ceolin de Faria S, da Cruz Fagundes M et al (2025) Percutaneous cryoablation therapy for abdominal wall endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Radiol 98:345–353. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqaf009\nWelch BT, Ehman EC, VanBuren WM et al (2020) Percutaneous cryoablation of abdominal wall endometriosis: the Mayo Clinic approach. Abdom Radiol 45:1813–1817. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-019-02379-4\nHaquin A, Delacroix C, Rode A et al (2025) Feasibility of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for abdominal wall endometriosis: a prospective pilot study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 32:288–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2024.10.022\nMahdavi A, Forouzannia SA, Goudarzi E et al (2024) Radiofrequency ablation: a promising treatment method for abdominal wall endometriosis. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 47:1009–1014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-024-03755-4\nKnorren ER, de Ridder LA, Nijholt IM et al (2024) Effectiveness and complication rates of high intensity focused ultrasound treatment for abdominal wall endometriosis: a systematic review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 297:15–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.03.029\nHu S, Liu Y, Chen R, Xiao Z (2022) Exploring the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging in ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation for abdominal wall endometriosis. Front Physiol 13:819259. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.819259\nMaillot J, Brun JL, Dubuisson V et al (2017) Mid-term outcomes after percutaneous cryoablation of symptomatic abdominal wall endometriosis: comparison with surgery alone in a single institution. Eur Radiol 27:4298–4306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-4827-7\nFunding\nThe authors state that this work has not received any funding.\nAuthor information\nAuthors and Affiliations\nCorresponding author\nEthics declarations\nGuarantor\nThe scientific guarantor of this publication is Dr. Léo Razakamanantsoa.\nConflict of interest\nL.R is a consultant for Boston Scientific and Varian-Siemens. F.H. Cornelis is a consultant for Boston Scientific, Varian-Siemens and Icecure.\nStatistics and biometry\nOne of the authors has significant statistical expertise. No complex statistical methods were necessary for this paper.\nInformed consent\nWritten informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board.\nEthical approval\nInstitutional Review Board approval was obtained.\nStudy subjects or cohorts overlap\nNo study subjects of this cohort were previously reported.\nMethodology\n-\nRetrospective\n-\nObservational\n-\nPerformed at one institution\nAdditional information\nPublisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.\nSupplementary information\nRights and permissions\nSpringer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.\nAbout this article\nCite this article\nde Rycke, AC., Faure, A., Najdawi, M. et al. Percutaneous image-guided cryoablation of umbilical endometriosis: safety, feasibility, clinical, and imaging outcomes. Eur Radiol (2026). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-026-12592-7\nReceived:\nRevised:\nAccepted:\nPublished:\nVersion of record:\nDOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-026-12592-7","source_license":"public-domain-us","license_restricted":false}