{"paper_id":"43e84ac6-5897-4cf8-9e48-4fc1bab5eea6","body_text":"Abstract\nTo define the risk factors of post-operative voiding dysfunction according to the type of surgical procedure performed. A systematic review through PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases was performed. The Medical Subject Headings terms aimed for English articles about colorectal endometriosis surgery and voiding dysfunction published until December 26, 2022 were used. The primary outcome was the occurrence of post-operative voiding dysfunction. Secondary outcome was the presence of a persistent voiding dysfunction at 1 month. MeSH terms included ‘‘deep endometriosis’’, ‘‘surgery’’, or ‘‘voiding dysfunction’’. Two reviewers (AM, PE) assessed the quality of each article independently. A Study Quality Assessment Tool was used to provide rating of the quality of the included studies. 22 studies were included in the final analysis. Rectal shaving was associated with less voiding dysfunction than segmental resection (OR 0.33; 95%CI [0.20: 0.54]; I2 = 0%; p < 10–3). No difference was found between rectal shaving and discoid excision (OR 0.44; 95%CI [0.07: 2.84]; I2 = 55%; p = 0.39), nor between discoid excision and segmental resection (OR 0.44; 95%CI [0.18: 1.09]; I2 = 49%; p = 0.08). Conservative surgery (i.e., shaving and discoid) was associated with less voiding dysfunction than radical surgery (i.e., segmental resection) (OR 0.37; 95%CI [0.25: 0.55]; I2 = 0%; p < 10–3). Regarding persistent voiding dysfunction, rectal shaving and discoid excision were less associated with voiding dysfunction than segmental resection (respectively, OR 0.30; 95%CI [0.14: 0.66]; I2 = 0%; p = 0.003 and OR 0.13; 95%CI [0.03: 0.57]; I2 = 0%; p = 0.007). Conservative bowel procedures are associated with lower rates of persistent post-operative voiding dysfunction and should be considered first when possible.\nTrial registration: Our meta-analysis was registered under the PROSPERO number: CRD42023395356.\nSimilar content being viewed by others\nData availability\nNot applicable.\nReferences\nDaraï E et al (2017) Pathogenesis, genetics and diagnosis of endometriosis. Presse Med 46(12 Pt 1):1156–1165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lpm.2017.10.003\nChapron C et al (2003) Anatomical distribution of deeply infiltrating endometriosis: surgical implications and proposition for a classification. Human Reprod (Oxford, England) 18(1):157–161. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deg009\nHeinz-Partington S et al (2021) Conservative vs radical bowel surgery for endometriosis: a systematic analysis of complications. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 61(2):169–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.13311\nVesale E et al (2020) Voiding dysfunction after colorectal surgery for endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 27(7):1490-1502.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2020.07.019\nVesale E et al (2021) Predictive approach in managing voiding dysfunction after surgery for deep endometriosis: a personalized nomogram. Int Urogynecol J 32(5):1205–1212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04428-9\nTurco LC et al (2020) Surgery-related complications and long-term functional morbidity after segmental colo-rectal resection for deep infiltrating endometriosis (ENDO-RESECT Morb). Arch Gynecol Obstet 302(4):983–993. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05694-0\nRoman H et al (2016) Long-term functional outcomes following colorectal resection versus shaving for rectal endometriosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 215(6):762.e1-762.e9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2016.06.055\nRoman H et al (2010) Delayed functional outcomes associated with surgical management of deep rectovaginal endometriosis with rectal involvement: giving patients an informed choice. Human Reprod (Oxford, England) 25(4):890–899. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dep407\nRoman H, FRIENDS group (French coloRectal Infiltrating ENDometriosis Study group) (2017) A national snapshot of the surgical management of deep infiltrating endometriosis of the rectum and colon in France in 2015: a multicenter series of 1135 cases. J Gynecol Obstet Human Reprod 46(2):159–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogoh.2016.09.004\nBassi MA et al (2020) Postoperative bowel symptoms improve over time after rectosigmoidectomy for endometriosis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 27(6):1316–1323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2019.10.009\nAbo C et al (2018) Postoperative complications after bowel endometriosis surgery by shaving, disc excision, or segmental resection: a three-arm comparative analysis of 364 consecutive cases. Fertil Steril 109(1):172-178.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.10.001\nBourdel N et al (2018) Long-term evaluation of painful symptoms and fertility after surgery for large rectovaginal endometriosis nodule: a retrospective study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 97(2):158–167. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13260\nDiguisto C et al (2015) Robotic assisted laparoscopy: comparison of segmentary colorectal resection and shaving for colorectal endometriosis. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 43(4):266–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gyobfe.2015.02.006\nAfors K et al (2016) Segmental and discoid resection are preferential to bowel shaving for medium-term symptomatic relief in patients with bowel endometriosis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 23(7):1123–1129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2016.08.813\nJatan AK et al (2006) Laparoscopic management of rectal endometriosis. Dis Colon Rectum 49(2):169–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-005-0264-9\nMohr C et al (2005) Fertility considerations in laparoscopic treatment of infiltrative bowel endometriosis. JSLS J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 9(1):16–24\nJayot A et al (2020) Feasibility, complications, and recurrence after discoid resection for colorectal endometriosis: a series of 93 cases. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 27(1):212–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2019.07.011\nAbo C et al (2019) Discoid resection for colorectal endometriosis: results from a prospective cohort from two french tertiary referral centres. Colorectal Dis 21(11):1312–1320. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.14733\nLe Gac M et al (2020) Comparison of robotic versus conventional laparoscopy for the treatment of colorectal endometriosis: pilot study of an expert center. J Gynecol Obstet Human Reprod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101885\nUccella S et al (2018) Functional outcomes of nerve-sparing laparoscopic eradication of deep infiltrating endometriosis: a prospective analysis using validated questionnaires. Arch Gynecol Obstet 298(3):639–647. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-018-4852-z\nHudelist G et al (2018) Pain and fertility outcomes of nerve-sparing, full-thickness disk or segmental bowel resection for deep infiltrating endometriosis-a prospective cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 97(12):1438–1446. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13436\nJayot A et al (2018) Comparison of laparoscopic discoid resection and segmental resection for colorectal endometriosis using a propensity score matching analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 25(3):440–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2017.09.019\nStepniewska A et al (2010) Colorectal endometriosis: benefits of long-term follow-up in patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery. Fertil Steril 93(7):2444–2446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.08.029\nBrouwer R, Woods RJ (2007) Rectal endometriosis: results of radical excision and review of published work. ANZ J Surg 77(7):562–571. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-2197.2007.04153.x\nFanfani F et al (2010) Discoid or segmental rectosigmoid resection for deep infiltrating endometriosis: a case-control study. Fertil Steril 94(2):444–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.03.066\nRoman H et al (2019) Excision versus colorectal resection in deep endometriosis infiltrating the rectum: 5-year follow-up of patients enrolled in a randomized controlled trial. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England) 34(12):2362–2371. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dez217\nD’Ancona G et al (2023) Robotic assisted rectal disk excision: the 3-cm diameter cut off may be abandoned. Fertil Steril 119(5):886–888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.01.048\nNamazov A et al (2020) Double disk excision of large deep endometriosis nodules infiltrating the low and mid rectum: a pilot study of 20 cases. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 27(7):1482–1489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2020.04.019\nDutra JA, de Resende, et al (2017) Risk of urinary retention after nerve-sparing surgery for deep infiltrating endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurourol Urodyn 36(1):57–61. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.22915\nCampin L et al (2014) Urinary functional disorders bound to deep endometriosis and to its treatment: review of the literature. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 43(6):431–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgyn.2014.03.003\nGoidescu OC et al (2022) The distribution of the inferior hypogastric plexus in female pelvis. J Med Life 15(6):784–791. https://doi.org/10.25122/jml-2022-0145\nDonnez O (2021) Conservative management of rectovaginal deep endometriosis: shaving should be considered as the primary surgical approach in a high majority of cases. J Clin Med 10(21):5183. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10215183\nChou D et al (2020) Shaving for bowel endometriosis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 27(2):268–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2019.11.012\nDonnez O, Roman H (2017) Choosing the right surgical technique for deep endometriosis: shaving, disc excision, or bowel resection? Fertil Steril 108(6):931–942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.09.006\nRedwine DB, Sharpe DR (1991) Laparoscopic segmental resection of the sigmoid colon for endometriosis. J Laparoendosc Surg 1(4):217–220. https://doi.org/10.1089/lps.1991.1.217\nCentini G et al (2023) The implications of the anatomy of the nerves and vessels in the treatment of rectosigmoid endometriosis. Clin Anat. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.24059\nCeccaroni M et al (2012) Nerve-sparing laparoscopic eradication of deep endometriosis with segmental rectal and parametrial resection: the negrar method. A single-center, prospective, clinical trial. Surg Endosc 26(7):2029–2045. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2153-3\nCeccaroni M, Clarizia R, Roviglione G (2020) Nerve-sparing surgery for deep infiltrating endometriosis: laparoscopic eradication of deep infiltrating endometriosis with rectal and parametrial resection according to the negrar method. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 27(2):263–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2019.09.002\nde Resende Júnior JAD et al (2018) Urodynamic observations and lower urinary tract symptoms associated with endometriosis: a prospective cross-sectional observational study assessing women with deep infiltrating disease. Int Urogynecol J 29(9):1349–1358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-017-3531-0\nBenoit L et al (2022) Parametrial endometriosis: a predictive and prognostic factor for voiding dysfunction and complications. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 276:236–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.07.035\nBonneau C et al (2013) Incidence of pre- and postoperative urinary dysfunction associated with deep infiltrating endometriosis: relevance of urodynamic tests and therapeutic implications. Miner Ginecol 65(4):385–405\nVerma V et al (2021) Risk factors for postoperative voiding dysfunction following surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 263:127–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.06.011\nFunding\nTenon Hospital funds were used to support the authors throughout the study period and manuscript preparation.\nAuthor information\nAuthors and Affiliations\nContributions\nA. Madar, A. Crestani, and P. Eraud participated in the redaction of this article. A. Spiers, A. Constantin, F. Chiche, E. Furet, P. Collinet, B. Merlot, and H. Roman participated in the data collection and corrected the early versions of the article. C. Touboul, Y. Dabi, and S. Bendifallah reviewed the final article before submission.\nCorresponding author\nEthics declarations\nConflict of interests\nThe authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.\nHuman and animal rights\nThis article does not contain any studies directly involving human participants, as it is a review of data already collected in a hernia database.\nInformed consent\nFor this type of study, formal consent is not required.\nAdditional information\nPublisher's Note\nSpringer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.\nRights and permissions\nSpringer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.\nAbout this article\nCite this article\nMadar, A., Crestani, A., Eraud, P. et al. Voiding dysfunction after surgery for colorectal deep infiltrating endometriosis: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Updates Surg 77, 739–748 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-025-02124-1\nReceived:\nAccepted:\nPublished:\nVersion of record:\nIssue date:\nDOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-025-02124-1","source_license":"CC0","license_restricted":false}