{"paper_id":"34ed9627-899c-46df-9f05-886a1b05eb99","body_text":"Abstract\nLeiomyoma, adenomyosis, and endometrial polyps are benign uterine disorders which seem to develop in the context of hormonal imbalances, due to steroid hormones, estrogen and progesterone, in association with various factors ranging from genetic factors to modifiable lifestyle factors. A growing body of evidence suggests that those hormones and their receptors are key modulators in the genesis and the growth of those pathologic entities. Further studies are required to understand their involvement in the pathogenesis of those lesions and their link to other factors such as extracellular matrix components, growth factors, chemokines, cytokines, and tissue repair mechanisms.\nAccess this chapter\nTax calculation will be finalised at checkout\nPurchases are for personal use only\nSimilar content being viewed by others\nReferences\nDeneris A. PALM-COEIN nomenclature for abnormal uterine bleeding. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2016;61:376–9.\nMunro MG. Uterine polyps, adenomyosis, leiomyomas, and endometrial receptivity. Fertil Steril. 2019;111:629–40.\nCramer SF, Patel A. The frequency of uterine leiomyomas. Am J Clin Pathol. 1990;94:435–8.\nBaird DD, Dunson DB, Hill MC, Cousins D, Schectman JM. High cumulative incidence of uterine leiomyoma in black and white women: ultrasound evidence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;188:100–7.\nTiltman AJ. Smooth muscle neoplasms of the uterus. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1997;9:48–51.\nKjerulff KH, Langenberg P, Seidman JD, Stolley PD, Guzinski GM. Uterine leiomyomas. Racial differences in severity, symptoms and age at diagnosis. J Reprod Med. 1996;41:483–90.\nMarshall LM, Spiegelman D, Barbieri RL, Goldman MB, Manson JE, Colditz GA, et al. Variation in the incidence of uterine leiomyoma among premenopausal women by age and race. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;90:967–73.\nMunro MG, HOD C, Broder MS, Fraser IS, FIGO Working Group on Menstrual Disorders. FIGO classification system (PALM-COEIN) for causes of abnormal uterine bleeding in nongravid women of reproductive age. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011;113:3–13.\nFlake GP, Andersen J, Dixon D. Etiology and pathogenesis of uterine leiomyomas: a review. Environ Health Perspect. 2003;111:1037–54.\nHuyck KL, Panhuysen CIM, Cuenco KT, Zhang J, Goldhammer H, Jones ES, et al. The impact of race as a risk factor for symptom severity and age at diagnosis of uterine leiomyomata among affected sisters. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198:168.e1–9.\nPeddada SD, Laughlin SK, Miner K, Guyon J-P, Haneke K, Vahdat HL, et al. Growth of uterine leiomyomata among premenopausal black and white women. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:19887–92.\nCardozo ER, Clark AD, Banks NK, Henne MB, Stegmann BJ, Segars JH. The estimated annual cost of uterine leiomyomata in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206:211.e1–9.\nStewart EA, Cookson CL, Gandolfo RA, Schulze-Rath R. Epidemiology of uterine fibroids: a systematic review. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2017;124:1501–12.\nPavone D, Clemenza S, Sorbi F, Fambrini M, Petraglia F. Epidemiology and risk factors of uterine fibroids. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;46:3–11.\nCanevari RA, Pontes A, Rosa FE, Rainho CA, Rogatto SR. Independent clonal origin of multiple uterine leiomyomas that was determined by X chromosome inactivation and microsatellite analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193:1395–403.\nZhang P, Zhang C, Hao J, Sung CJ, Quddus MR, Steinhoff MM, et al. Use of X-chromosome inactivation pattern to determine the clonal origins of uterine leiomyoma and leiomyosarcoma. Hum Pathol. 2006;37:1350–6.\nOno M, Qiang W, Serna VA, Yin P, Coon JS, Navarro A, et al. Role of stem cells in human uterine leiomyoma growth. PLoS One. 2012;7:e36935.\nMäkinen N, Mehine M, Tolvanen J, Kaasinen E, Li Y, Lehtonen HJ, et al. MED12, the mediator complex subunit 12 gene, is mutated at high frequency in uterine leiomyomas. Science. 2011;334:252–5.\nMarkowski DN, Bartnitzke S, Löning T, Drieschner N, Helmke BM, Bullerdiek J. MED12 mutations in uterine fibroids—their relationship to cytogenetic subgroups. Int J Cancer. 2012;131:1528–36.\nKämpjärvi K, Mäkinen N, Mehine M, Välipakka S, Uimari O, Pitkänen E, et al. MED12 mutations and FH inactivation are mutually exclusive in uterine leiomyomas. Br J Cancer. 2016;114:1405–11.\nLaunonen V, Vierimaa O, Kiuru M, Isola J, Roth S, Pukkala E, et al. Inherited susceptibility to uterine leiomyomas and renal cell cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:3387–92.\nTomlinson IPM, Alam NA, Rowan AJ, Barclay E, Jaeger EEM, Kelsell D, et al. Germline mutations in FH predispose to dominantly inherited uterine fibroids, skin leiomyomata and papillary renal cell cancer. Nat Genet. 2002;30:406–10.\nKovács KA, Oszter A, Göcze PM, Környei JL, Szabó I. Comparative analysis of cyclin D1 and oestrogen receptor (alpha and beta) levels in human leiomyoma and adjacent myometrium. Mol Hum Reprod. 2001;7:1085–91.\nYing Z, Weiyuan Z. Dual actions of progesterone on uterine leiomyoma correlate with the ratio of progesterone receptor A:B. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2009;25:520–3.\nViville B, Charnock-Jones DS, Sharkey AM, Wetzka B, Smith SK. Distribution of the A and B forms of the progesterone receptor messenger ribonucleic acid and protein in uterine leiomyomata and adjacent myometrium. Hum Reprod. 1997;12:815–22.\nBenassayag C, Leroy MJ, Rigourd V, Robert B, Honoré JC, Mignot TM, et al. Estrogen receptors (ERalpha/ERbeta) in normal and pathological growth of the human myometrium: pregnancy and leiomyoma. Am J Phys. 1999;276:E1112–8.\nBulun SE. Uterine fibroids. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1344–55.\nTai C-T, Lin W-C, Chang W-C, Chiu T-H, Chen GTC. Classical cadherin and catenin expression in normal myometrial tissues and uterine leiomyomas. Mol Reprod Dev. 2003;64:172–8.\nTanwar PS, Lee H-J, Zhang L, Zukerberg LR, Taketo MM, Rueda BR, et al. Constitutive activation of beta-catenin in uterine stroma and smooth muscle leads to the development of mesenchymal tumors in mice. Biol Reprod. 2009;81:545–52.\nMosimann C, Hausmann G, Basler K. Beta-catenin hits chromatin: regulation of Wnt target gene activation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2009;10:276–86.\nArici A, Sozen I. Transforming growth factor-beta3 is expressed at high levels in leiomyoma where it stimulates fibronectin expression and cell proliferation. Fertil Steril. 2000;73:1006–11.\nParsanezhad ME, Azmoon M, Alborzi S, Rajaeefard A, Zarei A, Kazerooni T, et al. A randomized, controlled clinical trial comparing the effects of aromatase inhibitor (letrozole) and gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (triptorelin) on uterine leiomyoma volume and hormonal status. Fertil Steril. 2010;93:192–8.\nKastner P, Krust A, Turcotte B, Stropp U, Tora L, Gronemeyer H, et al. Two distinct estrogen-regulated promoters generate transcripts encoding the two functionally different human progesterone receptor forms A and B. EMBO J. 1990;9:1603–14.\nKim JJ, Sefton EC. The role of progesterone signaling in the pathogenesis of uterine leiomyoma. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2012;358:223–31.\nDonnez J, Tomaszewski J, Vázquez F, Bouchard P, Lemieszczuk B, Baró F, et al. Ulipristal acetate versus leuprolide acetate for uterine fibroids. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:421–32.\nDonnez J, Tatarchuk TF, Bouchard P, Puscasiu L, Zakharenko NF, Ivanova T, et al. Ulipristal acetate versus placebo for fibroid treatment before surgery. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:409–20.\nIshikawa H, Ishi K, Serna VA, Kakazu R, Bulun SE, Kurita T. Progesterone is essential for maintenance and growth of uterine leiomyoma. Endocrinology. 2010;151:2433–42.\nOhara N, Morikawa A, Chen W, Wang J, DeManno DA, Chwalisz K, et al. Comparative effects of SPRM asoprisnil (J867) on proliferation, apoptosis, and the expression of growth factors in cultured uterine leiomyoma cells and normal myometrial cells. Reprod Sci. 2007;14:20–7.\nChen W, Ohara N, Wang J, Xu Q, Liu J, Morikawa A, et al. A novel selective progesterone receptor modulator asoprisnil (J867) inhibits proliferation and induces apoptosis in cultured human uterine leiomyoma cells in the absence of comparable effects on myometrial cells. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91:1296–304.\nHoekstra AV, Sefton EC, Berry E, Lu Z, Hardt J, Marsh E, et al. Progestins activate the AKT pathway in leiomyoma cells and promote survival. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94:1768–74.\nBagaria M, Suneja A, Vaid NB, Guleria K, Mishra K. Low-dose mifepristone in treatment of uterine leiomyoma: a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;49:77–83.\nWilliams ARW, Critchley HOD, Osei J, Ingamells S, Cameron IT, Han C, et al. The effects of the selective progesterone receptor modulator asoprisnil on the morphology of uterine tissues after 3 months treatment in patients with symptomatic uterine leiomyomata. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:1696–704.\nEngman M, Granberg S, Williams ARW, Meng CX, Lalitkumar PGL, Gemzell-Danielsson K. Mifepristone for treatment of uterine leiomyoma. A prospective randomized placebo controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2009;24:1870–9.\nEisinger SH, Meldrum S, Fiscella K, le Roux HD, Guzick DS. Low-dose mifepristone for uterine leiomyomata. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;101:243–50.\nMarret H, Fritel X, Ouldamer L, Bendifallah S, Brun J-L, De Jesus I, et al. Therapeutic management of uterine fibroid tumors: updated French guidelines. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012;165:156–64.\nGliklich RE, Leavy MB, Velentgas P, Campion DM, Mohr P, Sabharwal R, et al. Identification of Future Research Needs in the Comparative Management of Uterine Fibroid Disease. Effective Health Care Program. https://effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/topics/uterine-fibroids-2010/research\nLethaby A, Duckitt K, Farquhar C. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for heavy menstrual bleeding. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(1):CD000400.\nMutter GL, Bergeron C, Deligdisch L, Ferenczy A, Glant M, Merino M, et al. The spectrum of endometrial pathology induced by progesterone receptor modulators. Mod Pathol. 2008;21:591–8.\nTristan M, Orozco LJ, Steed A, Ramírez-Morera A, Stone P. Mifepristone for uterine fibroids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;(8):CD007687.\nShen Q, Hua Y, Jiang W, Zhang W, Chen M, Zhu X. Effects of mifepristone on uterine leiomyoma in premenopausal women: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2013;100:1722–6.e1–10.\nSangkomkamhang US, Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M, Mol BWJ. Progestogens or progestogen-releasing intrauterine systems for uterine fibroids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(2):CD008994.\nSteinauer J, Pritts EA, Jackson R, Jacoby AF. Systematic review of mifepristone for the treatment of uterine leiomyomata. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103:1331–6.\nMuzii L, Boni T, Bellati F, Marana R, Ruggiero A, Zullo MA, et al. GnRH analogue treatment before hysteroscopic resection of submucous myomas: a prospective, randomized, multicenter study. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:1496–9.\nLethaby AE, Vollenhoven BJ. An evidence-based approach to hormonal therapies for premenopausal women with fibroids. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;22:307–31.\nLaughlin-Tommaso SK, Stewart EA. Moving toward individualized medicine for uterine leiomyomas. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;132:961–71.\nFlierman PA, Oberyé JJL, van der Hulst VPM, de Blok S. Rapid reduction of leiomyoma volume during treatment with the GnRH antagonist ganirelix. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;112:638–42.\nPalomba S, Orio F, Morelli M, Russo T, Pellicano M, Zupi E, et al. Raloxifene administration in premenopausal women with uterine leiomyomas: a pilot study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87:3603–8.\nPalomba S, Russo T, Orio F, Tauchmanovà L, Zupi E, Panici PLB, et al. Effectiveness of combined GnRH analogue plus raloxifene administration in the treatment of uterine leiomyomas: a prospective, randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:3213–9.\nHilário SG, Bozzini N, Borsari R, Baracat EC. Action of aromatase inhibitor for treatment of uterine leiomyoma in perimenopausal patients. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:240–3.\nHartmann KE, Fonnesbeck C, Surawicz T, Krishnaswami S, Andrews JC, Wilson JE, et al. Management of Uterine Fibroids [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK537742/\nHehenkamp WJK, Volkers NA, Donderwinkel PFJ, de Blok S, Birnie E, Ankum WM, et al. Uterine artery embolization versus hysterectomy in the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids (EMMY trial): peri- and postprocedural results from a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193:1618–29.\nPeregrino PFM, de Lorenzo Messina M, dos Santos Simões R, Soares-Júnior JM, Baracat EC. Review of magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound in the treatment of uterine fibroids. Clinics. 2017;72:637–41.\nBrucker SY, Hahn M, Kraemer D, Taran FA, Isaacson KB, Krämer B. Laparoscopic radiofrequency volumetric thermal ablation of fibroids versus laparoscopic myomectomy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014;125:261–5.\nLee BB, Yu SP. Radiofrequency ablation of uterine fibroids: a review. Curr Obstet Gynecol Rep. 2016;5:318–24.\nKrämer B, Hahn M, Taran F-A, Kraemer D, Isaacson KB, Brucker SY. Interim analysis of a randomized controlled trial comparing laparoscopic radiofrequency volumetric thermal ablation of uterine fibroids with laparoscopic myomectomy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016;133:206–11.\nStewart EA, Laughlin-Tommaso SK, Catherino WH, Lalitkumar S, Gupta D, Vollenhoven B. Uterine fibroids. Nat Rev Dis Primer. 2016;2:16043.\nBird CC, McElin TW, Manalo-Estrella P. The elusive adenomyosis of the uterus—revisited. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1972;112:583–93.\nSeidman JD, Kjerulff KH. Pathologic findings from the Maryland Women’s Health Study: practice patterns in the diagnosis of adenomyosis. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 1996;15:217–21.\nPontis A, D’Alterio MN, Pirarba S, de Angelis C, Tinelli R, Angioni S. Adenomyosis: a systematic review of medical treatment. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2016;32:696–700.\nHever A, Roth RB, Hevezi PA, Lee J, Willhite D, White EC, et al. Molecular characterization of human adenomyosis. Mol Hum Reprod. 2006;12:737–48.\nFarquhar C, Brosens I. Medical and surgical management of adenomyosis. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;20:603–16.\nBazot M, Daraï E. Role of transvaginal sonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of uterine adenomyosis. Fertil Steril. 2018;109:389–97.\nGrimbizis GF, Mikos T, Tarlatzis B. Uterus-sparing operative treatment for adenomyosis. Fertil Steril. 2014;101:472–87.\nKishi Y, Suginami H, Kuramori R, Yabuta M, Suginami R, Taniguchi F. Four subtypes of adenomyosis assessed by magnetic resonance imaging and their specification. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;207:114.e1–7.\nTaran FA, Stewart EA, Brucker S. Adenomyosis: epidemiology, risk factors, clinical phenotype and surgical and interventional alternatives to hysterectomy. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2013;73:924–31.\nVannuccini S, Tosti C, Carmona F, Huang SJ, Chapron C, Guo S-W, et al. Pathogenesis of adenomyosis: an update on molecular mechanisms. Reprod Biomed Online. 2017;35:592–601.\nBergeron C, Amant F, Ferenczy A. Pathology and physiopathology of adenomyosis. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;20:511–21.\nBrosens JJ, de Souza NM, Barker FG. Uterine junctional zone: function and disease. Lancet Lond Engl. 1995;346:558–60.\nTakahashi K, Nagata H, Kitao M. Clinical usefulness of determination of estradiol level in the menstrual blood for patients with endometriosis. Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi. 1989;41:1849–50.\nTong X, Li Z, Wu Y, Fu X, Zhang Y, Fan H. COMT 158G/A and CYP1B1 432C/G polymorphisms increase the risk of endometriosis and adenomyosis: a meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014;179:17–21.\nWang Y, Qu Y, Song W. Genetic variation in COX-2 -1195 and the risk of endometriosis and adenomyosis. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2015;42:168–72.\nNie J, Liu X, Guo S-W. Promoter hypermethylation of progesterone receptor isoform B (PR-B) in adenomyosis and its rectification by a histone deacetylase inhibitor and a demethylation agent. Reprod Sci. 2010;17:995–1005.\nMehasseb MK, Panchal R, Taylor AH, Brown L, Bell SC, Habiba M. Estrogen and progesterone receptor isoform distribution through the menstrual cycle in uteri with and without adenomyosis. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:2228–35, 2235.e1.\nCohen I, Shapira J, Beyth Y, Bernheim J, Tepper R, Cordoba M, et al. Estrogen and progesterone receptors of adenomyosis in postmenopausal breast cancer patients treated with tamoxifen. Gynecol Obstet Investig. 1998;45:126–31.\nMcCluggage WG, Desai V, Manek S. Tamoxifen-associated postmenopausal adenomyosis exhibits stromal fibrosis, glandular dilatation and epithelial metaplasias. Histopathology. 2000;37:340–6.\nLeyendecker G, Wildt L. A new concept of endometriosis and adenomyosis: tissue injury and repair (TIAR). Horm Mol Biol Clin Investig. 2011;5:125–42.\nGarcía-Solares J, Donnez J, Donnez O, Dolmans M-M. Pathogenesis of uterine adenomyosis: invagination or metaplasia? Fertil Steril. 2018;109:371–9.\nLeyendecker G, Wildt L, Mall G. The pathophysiology of endometriosis and adenomyosis: tissue injury and repair. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009;280:529–38.\nRiggs JC, Lim EK, Liang D, Bullwinkel R. Cesarean section as a risk factor for the development of adenomyosis uteri. J Reprod Med. 2014;59:20–4.\nParazzini F, Vercellini P, Panazza S, Chatenoud L, Oldani S, Crosignani PG. Risk factors for adenomyosis. Hum Reprod. 1997;12:1275–9.\nTempleman C, Marshall SF, Ursin G, Horn-Ross PL, Clarke CA, Allen M, et al. Adenomyosis and endometriosis in the California Teachers Study. Fertil Steril. 2008;90:415–24.\nTaran FA, Weaver AL, Coddington CC, Stewart EA. Understanding adenomyosis: a case control study. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:1223–8.\nGargett CE. Uterine stem cells: what is the evidence? Hum Reprod Update. 2007;13:87–101.\nFerenczy A. Pathophysiology of adenomyosis. Hum Reprod Update. 1998;4:312–22.\nChan RWS, Schwab KE, Gargett CE. Clonogenicity of human endometrial epithelial and stromal cells. Biol Reprod. 2004;70:1738–50.\nGargett CE, Schwab KE, Deane JA. Endometrial stem/progenitor cells: the first 10 years. Hum Reprod Update. 2016;22:137–63.\nIbrahim MG, Chiantera V, Frangini S, Younes S, Köhler C, Taube ET, et al. Ultramicro-trauma in the endometrial-myometrial junctional zone and pale cell migration in adenomyosis. Fertil Steril. 2015;104:1475–1483.e3.\nVannuccini S, Petraglia F. Recent advances in understanding and managing adenomyosis. F1000Research 2019, 8(F1000 Faculty Rev):283 Last updated: 17 JUL 2019. https://f1000research.com/articles/8-28\nAngioni S, Pontis A, Dessole M, Surico D, De Cicco Nardone C, Melis I. Pain control and quality of life after laparoscopic en-block resection of deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) vs. incomplete surgical treatment with or without GnRHa administration after surgery. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015;291:363–70.\nFawzy M, Mesbah Y. Comparison of dienogest versus triptorelin acetate in premenopausal women with adenomyosis: a prospective clinical trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015;292:1267–71.\nIgarashi M. A new therapy for pelvic endometriosis and uterine adenomyosis: local effect of vaginal and intrauterine danazol application. Asia Oceania J Obstet Gynaecol. 1990;16:1–12.\nLuisi S, Razzi S, Lazzeri L, Bocchi C, Severi FM, Petraglia F. Efficacy of vaginal danazol treatment in women with menorrhagia during fertile age. Fertil Steril. 2009;92:1351–4.\nMuneyyirci-Delale O, Chandrareddy A, Mankame S, Osei-Tutu N, von Gizycki H. Norethindrone acetate in the medical management of adenomyosis. Pharmaceuticals. 2012;5:1120–7.\nSasagawa S, Shimizu Y, Kami H, Takeuchi T, Mita S, Imada K, et al. Dienogest is a selective progesterone receptor agonist in transactivation analysis with potent oral endometrial activity due to its efficient pharmacokinetic profile. Steroids. 2008;73:222–31.\nTakebayashi T, Fujino Y, Umesaki N, Ogita S. Danazol suspension injected into the uterine cervix of patients with adenomyosis and myoma. Preliminary study. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1995;39:207–11.\nTosti C, Vannuccini S, Troìa L, Luisi S, Centini G, Lazzeri L, et al. Long-term vaginal danazol treatment in fertile age women with adenomyosis. J Endometr Pelvic Pain Disord. 2017;9:39–43.\nZhang X, Yuan H, Deng L, Hu F, Ma J, Lin J. Evaluation of the efficacy of a danazol-loaded intrauterine contraceptive device on adenomyosis in an ICR mouse model. Hum Reprod. 2008;23:2024–30.\nFedele L, Bianchi S, Raffaelli R, Portuese A, Dorta M. Treatment of adenomyosis-associated menorrhagia with a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device. Fertil Steril. 1997;68:426–9.\nFraser IS. Non-contraceptive health benefits of intrauterine hormonal systems. Contraception. 2010;82:396–403.\nSabbioni L, Petraglia F, Luisi S. Non-contraceptive benefits of intrauterine levonorgestrel administration: why not? Gynecol Endocrinol. 2017;33:822–9.\nFong YF, Singh K. Medical treatment of a grossly enlarged adenomyotic uterus with the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system. Contraception. 1999;60:173–5.\nOzdegirmenci O, Kayikcioglu F, Akgul MA, Kaplan M, Karcaaltincaba M, Haberal A, et al. Comparison of levonorgestrel intrauterine system versus hysterectomy on efficacy and quality of life in patients with adenomyosis. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:497–502.\nMarjoribanks J, Proctor M, Farquhar C, Derks RS. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for dysmenorrhoea. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(1):CD001751.\nBrosens I, Gordts S, Habiba M, Benagiano G. Uterine cystic adenomyosis: a disease of younger women. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2015;28:420–6.\nGordts S, Campo R, Brosens I. Hysteroscopic diagnosis and excision of myometrial cystic adenomyosis. Gynecol Surg. 2014;11:273–8.\nKriplani A, Mahey R, Agarwal N, Bhatla N, Yadav R, Singh MK. Laparoscopic management of juvenile cystic adenomyoma: four cases. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2011;18:343–8.\nDueholm M. Uterine adenomyosis and infertility, review of reproductive outcome after in vitro fertilization and surgery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017;96:715–26.\nPepas L, Deguara C, Davis C. Update on the surgical management of adenomyosis. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2012;24:259–64.\nKim K-R, Peng R, Ro JY, Robboy SJ. A diagnostically useful histopathologic feature of endometrial polyp: the long axis of endometrial glands arranged parallel to surface epithelium. Am J Surg Pathol. 2004;28:1057–62.\nde Rijk SR, Steenbergen ME, Nieboer TE, Coppus SF. Atypical endometrial polyps and concurrent endometrial cancer: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128:519–25.\nKelly P, Dobbs SP, McCluggage WG. Endometrial hyperplasia involving endometrial polyps: report of a series and discussion of the significance in an endometrial biopsy specimen. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2007;114:944–50.\nWong M, Crnobrnja B, Liberale V, Dharmarajah K, Widschwendter M, Jurkovic D. The natural history of endometrial polyps. Hum Reprod. 2017;32:340–5.\nFletcher JA, Pinkus JL, Lage JM, Morton CC, Pinkus GS. Clonal 6p21 rearrangement is restricted to the mesenchymal component of an endometrial polyp. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 1992;5:260–3.\nDal Cin P, Vanni R, Marras S, Moerman P, Kools P, Andria M, et al. Four cytogenetic subgroups can be identified in endometrial polyps. Cancer Res. 1995;55:1565–8.\nTallini G, Vanni R, Manfioletti G, Kazmierczak B, Faa G, Pauwels P, et al. HMGI-C and HMGI(Y) immunoreactivity correlates with cytogenetic abnormalities in lipomas, pulmonary chondroid hamartomas, endometrial polyps, and uterine leiomyomas and is compatible with rearrangement of the HMGI-C and HMGI(Y) genes. Lab Investig J Tech Methods Pathol. 2000;80:359–69.\nDal Cin P, Timmerman D, Van den Berghe I, Wanschura S, Kazmierczak B, Vergote I, et al. Genomic changes in endometrial polyps associated with tamoxifen show no evidence for its action as an external carcinogen. Cancer Res. 1998;58:2278–81.\nMaia H, Pimentel K, Silva TMC, Freitas LAR, Zausner B, Athayde C, et al. Aromatase and cyclooxygenase-2 expression in endometrial polyps during the menstrual cycle. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2006;22:219–24.\nPal L, Niklaus AL, Kim M, Pollack S, Santoro N. Heterogeneity in endometrial expression of aromatase in polyp-bearing uteri. Hum Reprod. 2008;23:80–4.\nZhang C, Sung CJ, Quddus MR, Simon RA, Jazaerly T, Lawrence WD. Association of ovarian hyperthecosis with endometrial polyp, endometrial hyperplasia, and endometrioid adenocarcinoma in postmenopausal women: a clinicopathological study of 238 cases. Hum Pathol. 2017;59:120–4.\nBerlière M, Radikov G, Galant C, Piette P, Marbaix E, Donnez J. Identification of women at high risk of developing endometrial cancer on tamoxifen. Eur J Cancer. 2000;36(Suppl 4):S35–6.\nNappi L, Indraccolo U, Di Spiezio Sardo A, Gentile G, Palombino K, Castaldi MA, et al. Are diabetes, hypertension, and obesity independent risk factors for endometrial polyps? J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2009;16:157–62.\nLee SC, Kaunitz AM, Sanchez-Ramos L, Rhatigan RM. The oncogenic potential of endometrial polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116:1197–205.\nGoldstein SR, Monteagudo A, Popiolek D, Mayberry P, Timor-Tritsch I. Evaluation of endometrial polyps. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186:669–74.\nSalim S, Won H, Nesbitt-Hawes E, Campbell N, Abbott J. Diagnosis and management of endometrial polyps: a critical review of the literature. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2011;18:569–81.\nSavelli L, De Iaco P, Santini D, Rosati F, Ghi T, Pignotti E, et al. Histopathologic features and risk factors for benignity, hyperplasia, and cancer in endometrial polyps. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;188:927–31.\nLi F, Wei S, Yang S, Liu Z, Nan F. Post hysteroscopic progesterone hormone therapy in the treatment of endometrial polyps. Pak J Med Sci. 2018;34:1267–71.\nArnes M, Hvingel B, Orbo A. Levonorgestrel-impregnated intrauterine device reduces occurrence of hyperplastic polyps: a population-based follow-up cohort study. Anticancer Res. 2014;34:2319–24.\nAuthor information\nAuthors and Affiliations\nCorresponding authors\nEditor information\nEditors and Affiliations\nRights and permissions\nCopyright information\n© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG\nAbout this chapter\nCite this chapter\nKossaï, M., Penault-Llorca, F. (2020). Role of Hormones in Common Benign Uterine Lesions: Endometrial Polyps, Leiomyomas, and Adenomyosis. In: Deligdisch-Schor, L., Mareş Miceli, A. (eds) Hormonal Pathology of the Uterus . Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 1242. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38474-6_3\nDownload citation\nDOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38474-6_3\nPublished:\nPublisher Name: Springer, Cham\nPrint ISBN: 978-3-030-38473-9\nOnline ISBN: 978-3-030-38474-6\neBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)","source_license":"CC0","license_restricted":false}