{"paper_id":"3279791a-365a-4578-959c-4c235b0bf729","body_text":"PGRMC1-dependent lipophagy promotes ferroptosis in paclitaxel-tolerant persister cancer cells | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article PGRMC1-dependent lipophagy promotes ferroptosis in paclitaxel-tolerant persister cancer cells Ji Hyeon You, Jaewang Lee, Jong-Lyel Roh This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-810226/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Under Review Version 1 posted 13 You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Background Progesterone receptor membrane component 1 (PGRMC1) is a heme-binding protein inducing dimerization with cytochrome P450, which mediates chemoresistance. Increased PGRMC1 expression is found in multiple types of resistant cancers but the role of PGRMC1 in ferroptosis of cancer cells remains unrevealed. Therefore, we examined the role of PGRMC1 in promoting ferroptosis in paclitaxel-tolerant persister cancer cells (PCC). Methods The effects of ferroptosis inducers and PGRMC1 gene silencing/overexpression were tested on head and neck cancer (HNC) cell lines and mouse tumor xenograft models. The effects were analyzed about cell viability, death, lipid ROS and iron production, mRNA/protein expression and interaction, and lipid assays. Results PCC had more free fatty acids, lipid droplets, and fatty acid oxidation (FAO) than their parental cells. PCC was highly sensitive to inhibitors of system xc − cystine/glutamate antiporter (xCT), such as erastin, sulfasalazine, and cyst(e)ine deprivation, but less sensitive to (1S,3R)-RSL3. PGRMC1 silencing in PCC reduced ferroptosis sensitivity by xCT inhibitors and PGRMC1 overexpression in parental cells increased ferroptosis by xCT inhibitors. Lipid droplets were degraded along with autophagy induction and autophagosome formation by erastin treatment in PCC. Lipophagy was accompanied by increased tubulin detyrosination, which was increased by SIRT1 activation but decreased by SIRT1 inhibition. FAO and lipophagy were also promoted by the interaction between lipid droplets and mitochondria. Conclusion PGRMC1 expression increased FAO and ferroptosis sensitivity from in vivo mice experiments. Our data suggest that PGRMC1 promotes ferroptosis by xCT inhibition in PCC. Otorhinolaryngology Surgery Progesterone receptor membrane component 1 ferroptosis fatty acid oxidation lipophagy tubulin detyrosination Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Figure 6 Figure 7 Figure 8 Condensed Abstract Paclitaxel-tolerant persister cancer cells (PCC) had PGRMC1 upregulation related to increased free fatty acids, lipid droplets, and fatty acid oxidation. PGRMC1 expression substantially increased ferroptosis by xCT inhibition via lipophagy and tubulin detyrosination, whereas PGRMC1 silencing decreased ferroptosis: this suggests that PGRMC1 expression promotes ferroptosis in PCC. Background Despite the development of various anti-cancer agents, cancer cells can evade effective treatment via some of the ways from pre-existing resistance, de novo mutations, and drug-tolerant persisters [ 1 ]. Drug-tolerant persister cancer cells are small surviving fractions evading from chemotherapeutic drugs that cause a major drawback of conventional or targeted therapy. A slow glowing persister cancer cells are more resistant to anti-cancer drugs [ 2 ]. Tumor cell plasticity in response to treatment toxicity is attended with the donning molecular disguise of genetic, transcriptional, chromatin, epigenetic, and microenvironmental reprogramming that may be targeted to kill persister cancer cells [ 3 ]. Understanding the resistant mechanisms can lead to incremental innovation for the development of effective anti-cancer strategies. Drug-tolerant persister cancer cells have characteristics of a high mesenchymal cell state dependent on a lipid peroxidase pathway involving glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4) [ 4 ]. Acquired drug resistance can be overcome by ferroptosis inducers targeting xCT or GPX4 which is the major regulator of ferroptosis [ 5 , 6 ]. Lipid peroxidase pathway utilizes glutathione (GSH) which is a seminal cellular antioxidant for eliminating lipid reactive oxygen species (ROS) [ 7 ]. GSH is generated from cysteine transported by system xc − cystine/glutamate antiporter (xCT) [ 7 ]. Polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) are essential sources to produce lipid peroxidation by multiple inner bonds of ROS [ 8 ]. Consequently, excessive lipid peroxidation disturbs cellular membrane integrity and causes cell death [ 9 ]. Ferrous iron catalyzes the Fenton reaction as an electron donor, which contributes to the iron-dependent accumulation of excessive lipid peroxidation, leading to a new form of necrotic cell death, ferroptosis [ 10 ]. Progesterone receptor membrane component 1 (PGRMC1) is a heme-binding protein that binds and modulates the activity of cytochrome P450 enzymes, which may impact multiple biochemical pathways and drug metabolism [ 11 ]. PGRMC1 involves the diverse functions of steroidogenesis, progesterone (P4) signaling, membrane trafficking, and mitotic spindle and cell cycle regulation [ 12 ]. Increased PGRMC1 expression is found in a variety of tumors including lung, colon, thyroid, breast, ovary, and cervix [ 13 ]. Besides, PGRMC1 induces autophagy via binding to microtubule-associated proteins 1 light chain 3 (LC3), an essential component for the degradative activity of autophagy [ 14 ]. PGRMC1 expression influences altered lipid and glycolytic metabolism, resistances to apoptosis by chemotherapeutic agents, epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), invasion, and metastasis [ 12 ]. PGRMC1 also involves in hormone and cholesterol synthesis, and drug metabolism, which mediates chemoresistance [ 15 ]. Increased PGRMC1 expression is found in multiple types of resistant cancers but the role of PGRMC1 in cancer cell ferroptosis remains unrevealed. We developed drug-tolerant persister cancer cells from parental head and neck cancer (HNC) cells. The persister cells exhibited a highly increased expression of PGRMC1 that might contribute to the acquisition of drug resistance but became vulnerable to ferroptosis by xCT inhibitors. Therefore, we examined the role of PGRMC1 in promoting ferroptosis in paclitaxel-tolerant persister cancer cells (PCC). Methods Cell culture and drug-tolerant persister cancer cell derivation HNC cell lines, namely AMC HN3 and HN4, were used for our experiments [ 16 ]. The cell lines were authenticated by short tandem repeat-based DNA fingerprinting and multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The cells were cultured in Eagle's minimum essential medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, penicillin, and streptomycin at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO 2 . Drug-tolerant persister cancer cells were derived from HN3 and HN4 cells with 10 nM paclitaxel (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Paclitaxel was treated for 6 days with a new drug added every 3 days and this was repeated in regrown cells after no treatment for 38 days. Re-derived persister and parental cells were used in experiments. PCC was selected by 10 nM paclitaxel every 2 weeks to maintain drug tolerance characteristics. Cell viability and death assays Cell viability was measured in the cells that were subjected to (1S,3R)-RSL3) (19288; Cayman Chemical Co., Ann Arbor, MI, USA), erastin (S7242; Selleckchem, Houston, TX, USA), sulfasalazine (S0883; Sigma-Aldrich), or an equivalent amount of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), or were cultured in the conditioned media with no cysteine and cystine (cyst(e)ine, 1641454; MP Biomedicals, Irvine, CA, USA). After exposure, cell viability was assessed using cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8) (CK04; Dojindo Molecular Technologies, Inc., Tokyo, Japan) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The cells were incubated with the CCK-8 solution for 1 h, and then the cell viability was measured at the absorbance of 450 nm using a SpectraMax M2 microplate reader (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). After exposure to the agents, cell death was assessed via SYTOX Green (S34860; Thermo Fisher Scientific) staining. The samples were washed three times with Hanks' balanced salt solution without calcium and magnesium (HBSS, 14025076; Thermo Fisher Scientific), followed by staining of cells in each plate with 5 µM SYTOX Green in HBSS for 20 min. The stained cells were observed using a ZEISS fluorescent microscope (Axiovert 200M; Oberkochen, Germany) and analyzed using ImageJ software (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA). The mean SYTOX Green-positive fractions were compared with those of the control group. Measurement of lipid and mitochondrial reactive oxygen species Lipid reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation was measured by adding 5 µM BODIPY™ 581/591 C11 (a lipid peroxidation sensor, D3861; Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 30 min at 37°C. The ROS levels were analyzed using a CytoFLEX flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA), (non)oxidized and oxidized forms were confirmed by ZEISS fluorescent microscope. Image quantification was performed using ImageJ software. For mitochondrial ROS, cells were seeded in 60 mm dishes. After indicated drug treatment, cells were incubated with 5 µM mitoSOX™ Red (M36008; Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 20 min. MitoSOX™ Red was measured by ZEISS fluorescent microscope. The quantification of fluorescence intensity was performed using ImageJ software. Glycolysis and glutamate assays Glycolysis assay was measured using a glycolysis assay kit (ab197244; Abcam) at 380 nm excitation and 615 nm emission using a SpectraMax M2 microplate reader. The glycolytic effect was calculated through extracellular acidification (ECAR) using a microplate fluorometer at 15 min intervals and was examined from ECAR assay at 120 min. All examinations were operated on in 5×10 5 cells per sample following the manufacturer’s protocol. Glutamate contents were measured using a glutamate assay kit (ab83389; Abcam) following the manufacture’s protocol. Measurement of GSH synthesis and intracellular iron Intracellular GSH levels in HNC cell lysates were measured using a GSH/GSSG assay kit (EGTT-100; BioAssay Systems, Hayward, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Labile iron pool (LIP) assay was measured by using calcein acetoxymethyl ester (354217; Corning Inc., Corning, NY, USA) and iron chelator, deferoxamine (ab120727; Abcam, Cambridge, UK). The cells were loaded with calcein-AM (8 µg/ml) for 30 min at 37°C and then washed with HBSS. Deferoxamine was added at a final concentration of 100 µM to remove iron from calcein, causing dequenching. The change in fluorescence following the addition of deferoxamine was used as an indirect measure of the LIP. Fluorescence was measured at 485 nm excitation and 535 nm emission with a VICTOR X3 microplate reader (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA) and ZEISS fluorescent microscope. Measurements of autophagic flux The cells were seeded and were treated with erastin or other agents with or without 30 nM Wortmannin (W1628; Sigma-Aldrich). Also, autophagy-related molecules were confirmed by immunoblotting. To assess the later process of autophagy, all cells were stained with Lysotracker™ Red DND-99 (L7528; Thermo Fisher Scientific). Co-localization of LC3-GFP-puncta and lysosome was confirmed using the ZEISS LSM 880 confocal microscope. Measurements of free fatty acid For quantification of free fatty acid (FFA), parental HNC cells and PCC were seeded in 100 mm dishes. Then, cells were treated with or without ferroptosis inducers. Intracellular FFA was measured using PicoSens™ Free Fatty Acid Quantification Kit (BM-FFA-100; BIOMAX, Seoul, Republic of Korea) according to the manufacturer's instructions. GC/MS analysis PCC and parental cells were seeded in culture medium in 150-cm tissue culture dishes and were harvested in two days with a rubber-tipped cell scraper. The cells were washed, centrifuged twice with 1× phosphate-buffered saline and transferred to tubes in an equal number of 5×10 6 cells. The cells proceeded with lipid extraction after flash-freezing in LN2. For fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) analysis, cells were lyophilized and ground into fine powders. Fatty acids were extracted using 2 mL methylation mixture (MeOH:Benzene:DMP (2,2-Dimethoxy-propane):H 2 SO 4 = 39:20:5:2) and 1 mL heptane, 80 ℃ for 2 h. Then, supernatants were analyzed using GC/MS (Agilent 7890 GC System; Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The analysis condition was as follows: column (DB-23, 120 mm*0.25 mm* 0.25 µm; Agilent), injector (250 ℃), detector (FID-280 ℃, H 2 35 ml/min, air 350 ml/min, He 10 ml/min), STD (CRM47885; Supelco 37 component FAME Mix; Supelco, Inc., Bellefonte, PA, USA), and ISTD (P6125; Pentadecanoic acid) (Sigma-Aldrich) [ 17 ]. After GC/MS analysis, all samples were normalized. RNA interference and gene transfection HNC cells were seeded for gene silencing or overexpression. Cells were transfected 24 h later with 10 nmol/L small-interfering RNA (siRNA) targeting human SIRT1 or scrambled control siRNA (Integrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, IA, USA) using Lipofectamine RNAiMAX reagent (13778075; Thermo Fisher Scientific). PCC was stably transduced with short hairpin RNA (shRNA) targeting PGRMC1 (pGPU6/Neo, GenePharma, Shanghai, China) using Lipofectamine 3000 reagent (L3000001; Thermo Fisher Scientific). HN3 and HN4 cells were seeded and stably transfected with a control pcDNA3.1 plasmid (V790-20; Addgene, Watertown, MA, USA) or pcDNA3.1-PGRMC1 plasmid by using Lipofectamine 3000 reagent. The levels of PGRMC1 and SIRT1 expression were confirmed via western blotting. pEGFP-LC3 (21073; Addgene) was stably transfected into HN4 parental cells, HN4-PGRMC1 plasmid, HN4PCC, and HN4PCC-shPGRMC1 using Lipofectamine 3000 reagent. Reverse transcription-quantitative PCR and methylation-specific PCR HNC cells were cultured with 70% confluence in 6-cm tissue culture dishes. Total RNA from HNC cells was isolated using a total RNA extraction kit (K-3140; Bioneer, Daejeon, Republic of Korea) following the manufacturer's instructions. A reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) was performed using a SensiFAST™ SYBR® No-ROX Kit (BIO-98050; Bioline International, Toronto, Canada) after cDNA synthesis with a SensiFAST™ cDNA Synthesis Kit (BIO-65054; Bioline International). PGRMC1, SIRT1, and ACTB were amplified, and the relative target mRNA levels were determined using mathematical expression 2 −(ΔΔCt) . All data were normalized against ACTB mRNA levels. Real-time PCR was performed with ViiA™ 7 Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Methylation-specific PCR (MSP) indicated methylated promoter level in bisulfite-treated genomic DNA. Genomic DNA from HNC cells was extracted by a genomic DNA extraction kit (YGB100; Real Biotech Co., Taipei, Taiwan). Extracted genomic DNA was converted into a bisulfite form using a BisulFlash DNA Modification Kit (P-1026-050; EpiGentek, Farmingdale, NY, USA). The degree of methylation was determined in SIRT1 by RT-qPCR using a Methylamp MS-qPCR Fast Kit (P-1028-100; EpiGentek). Immunoblotting and immunostaining Cells were plated and grown with 70% confluence and then treated with indicated drugs or not. Cells were lysed at 4°C in a cell lysis buffer (9803; Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA) with a protease/phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (5872; Cell Signaling Technology). A total of 10–40 µg protein was resolved by SDS-PAGE on 10–15% gels; the resolved proteins were then transferred to nitrocellulose or polyvinylidene difluoride membranes and probed with primary and secondary antibodies. The following primary antibodies were used: PGRMC1 (K004086P; Solarbio Life Science, Beijing, China), CD36 (K004214P; Solarbio), ATGL (K004384P; Solarbio), PLIN2 (K004402P; Solarbio), ACC (3662; Cell Signaling Technology Co., Danvers, MA, USA), FASN (K001685P; Solarbio), CPT1A (K000391P; Solarbio), AMPK (2532; Cell Signaling), pAMPK (2531; Cell Signaling), 4-HNE (MA5-27570; Invitrogen), LC3B (K002189P; Solarbio), ATG5 (K106671P; Solarbio), p62 (K005444P; Solarbio), SIRT1 (sc74465; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), TTL (K009740P; Solarbio), TCP1 (K003097P; Solarbio), tyrosinated α-tubulin (ABT171; Merck Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA), detyrosinated α-tubulin (AB3201; Merck Millipore), xCT (K009230P; Solarbio), GPX4 (K006597P; Solarbio), ACSL4 (K004812P; Solarbio), and β-actin (BS6007M; BioWorld, Atlanta, GA, USA). β-actin served as the total loading control. The cells were also immunostained with an antibody against PGRMC1 (1:200; Solarbio) or detyrosinated α-tubulin (1:200; Merck Millipore). The cells were co-stained with BODIPY™ 493/503 for lipid droplets (D3922; Thermo Fisher Scientific), LysoTracker™ Deep Red (L12492; Thermo Fisher Scientific), or MitoTracker TM (M7510; Thermo Fisher Scientific). Nuclei were blue-stained with 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). Tumor xenograft All animal study procedures were performed by protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC). Six-week-old athymic BALB/c male nude mice (nu/nu) were purchased from OrientBio (Seoul, Republic of Korea). HN4 cells with transfection of PGRMC1 overexpression or control vector and HN4PCC with shPGRMC1 or control vector were subcutaneously injected into the bilateral flank of nude mice. From the day when gross nodules were detected in tumor implants, mice were subjected to different treatments: vehicle or sulfasalazine (250 mg/kg daily per intraperitoneal route) [ 18 ]. Erastin was not used due to its physiological instability and instead, sulfasalazine was used in our in vivo experiment [ 4 ]. Each group included six mice. The tumor size and weight of each mouse were measured twice a week, and tumor volume was calculated as (length × width 2 )/2. After mice were sacrificed, tumors were isolated and analyzed by staining lipid droplets. The values were compared among differently treated tumors. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) dataset and statistical analysis The expression levels of PGRMC1 mRNA were obtained from the normal mucosa ( n = 44) and HNC ( n = 499) datasets of TCGA. The tumor and survival data were analyzed to find the correlation between the expression level of PGRMC1 mRNA and their survival outcomes. Data were presented as mean±standard deviation (s.d.). The statistically significant differences between the treatment groups were assessed using Mann–Whitney U -test or analysis of variance (ANOVA) with the Bonferroni post-hoc test. The median values of low and high expression levels of PCBP1 mRNA were determined and compared using a t -test. The cutoff value of PGRMC1 was determined at the lowest P values for overall survival. Univariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were used to identify associations between PGRMC1 mRNA expression levels and overall survival in the HNC cohort. The Kaplan–Meier and log-rank tests were used to determine and statistically compare the survival rates, respectively. All statistical tests were two-sided, and a P -value of < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. The statistical tests were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 22.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). Results PCC has a metabolic shift to fatty acid oxidation Drug-tolerant persister cancer cells were developed from the treatment of paclitaxel, a first-line taxane anticancer agent for a variety of cancer types arising in the head and neck, esophagus, lung, ovary, cervix, breast, pancreas, and others [ 19 ]. Two HNC cell lines, HN3 and HN4, were treated with a cytotoxic dose (10 nM) of paclitaxel for 6 days, after which remained only a small population of surviving persister cancer cells. The cells were regrown without drugs for 38 days and then were re-treated with 10 nM paclitaxel for 6 days to acquire drug-tolerant persister traits (Fig. 1 A). Cell viability significantly increased and cell death significantly decreased in HN3 and HN4 PCC when compared with those of HN3 and HN4 parental cells ( P < 0.01) (Figs. 1 B and S1A). PCC had different properties from their parental HNC cells. Microtubules were disoriented in PCC but not in parental cells (Fig. 1 C). ECAR and glycolysis effect of PCC were significantly lower than those of parental cells, whereas glutamate contents of PCC were significantly higher than those of parental cells ( P < 0.01) (Figs. 1 D– 1 F). Free fatty acids and fatty acid oxidation (FAO) significantly increased in PCC compared to parental cells ( P < 0.01) (Figs. 1 G– 1 I). Lipids were more deposited and lipid droplets substantially increased in PCC than parental cells (Figs. 1 J and 1 L). On immunoblotting, molecules related to fatty acids uptake and FAO, such as CD36, ATGL, PLIN2, PGRMC1, and CPT1A, increased but molecules related to fatty acid synthesis (FAS), such as ACC and FASN, decreased in PCC compared to parental cells (Fig. 1 K). Taken together, PCC showed more metabolic trend shifting to FAO than their parental cells. PCC is vulnerable to xCT inhibitors Cell death significantly increased in PCC compared to parental cells when exposed to ferroptosis inducers inhibiting xCT: erastin, sulfasalazine, and cyst(e)ine deprivation ( P < 0.01) (Figs. 2 A– 2 B). The cells showed minimal sensitivity to RSL3, an inhibitor of GPX4. Cell death by ferroptosis inducers was recovered by co-treatment with ferrostatin-1, an inhibitor of ferroptosis. Cell viability by xCT inhibitors also significantly decreased in PCC ( P < 0.01) (Fig. 2 C). Lipid peroxidation more increased in PCC than in parental cells when exposed to the xCT inhibitors ( P < 0.01) (Figs. 2 D and S1B). Cellular glutathione levels in PCC were higher than parental cells and were significantly decreased by xCT inhibitors ( P < 0.01) (Fig. 2 E). Free fatty acid and FAO levels increased in PCC were significantly decreased by xCT inhibitors ( P < 0.01) (Figs. 2 F– 2 H). Lipid deposition in PCC was significantly decreased by xCT inhibitors (Fig. 2 I). On immunoblotting, pAMPK, CD36, CPT1A, ATGL, and 4-HNE increased in PCC but not in parental cells when exposed to the xCT inhibitors, whereas ACC, FASN, and ATGL decreased in PCC (Fig. 2 J). Taken together, PCC showed more vulnerability to xCT inhibitors than parental cells. Regulation of FAO or FAS in PCC modestly increases ferroptosis PCC showed prominent changes in fatty acid metabolism by shifting to FAO. Therefore, we examined whether modulation of fatty acid metabolism related to FAO or FAS affected ferroptosis sensitivity by the ferroptosis inducers. CPT1A is a rate-limiting enzyme for mitochondrial FAO that can be blocked by shCPT1A transfection into cells or etomoxir, a small-molecule inhibitor of CPT1A [ 20 ]. Malonyl-CoA is formed from citrate by acetyl-CoA carboxylases (ACC), and perphenazine activates protein phosphatase 2 (PP2A) converting ACC to an active form [ 21 ]. All the malonyl-CoA, citrate, and perphenazine can increase FAS in cells. The inhibition of CPT1A or activation of ACC modestly increased ferroptotic cell death in PCC with the treatment of RSL3 or erastin (Figs. S2A–S2C). Lipid peroxidation and mitochondrial ROS generation modestly increased in PCC treated with RSL3 or erastin (Figs. S2D–S2F). CPT1A silencing inhibited FAO but enhanced FAS by the increased expression of ACC, FASN, and CD36, and malonyl-CoA, citrate, or perphenazine treatment also increased FAS by the increased expression of CD36 or ACC and FASN (Fig. S3A–S3B). Expression of PGRMC1, ATGL, and LN3B was not significantly changed. Free fatty acid, lipid droplets, and lipid deposition were modestly increased by inhibition of FAO and activation of FAS, which were modestly decreased by erastin treatment (Figs. S3D–S3F). Inhibition of FAO and activation of FAS increased the expression of ACSL4, 4-HNE, pAMPK, LC3B, p16, and α-tubulin to minimal levels (Figs. S4A–S4B). Lipid droplets were minimally changed by CTP1A inhibition or citrate treatment combined with treatment of erastin (Figs. S4C–S4D). Taken together, inhibition of FAO and activation of FAS had a modest effect on ferroptosis sensitivity and minimal effect on lipophagy. PGRMC1 is a critical regulator of enhanced ferroptosis in PCC We identified that PGRMC1 expression robustly increased in PCC. PGRMC1 is known to alter lipid metabolism and promote the proliferation and progression of cancer cells [ 22 ]. Next, we inhibited PGRMC1 expression in PCC by transfection of shPGRMC1 vector and induced PGRMC1 expression in parental HNC cells by transfection of PGRMC1 overexpression vector (Figs. 3 A– 3 B). PGRMC1 silencing in PCC significantly decreased ferroptosis sensitivity by xCT inhibitors in terms of examining cell viability, death, and labile iron pool (Figs. 3 C– 3 E). Conversely, PCRMC1 overexpression in parental HNC cells significantly decreased cell viability and increased cell death, lipid peroxidation, and intracellular labile iron pool, when the cells underwent xCT inhibitors (Figs. 3 F– 3 H). On immunoblotting, CD36, CPT1A, ATGL, PLIN2, LC3B, and PGRMC1 expression increased in parental cells with PGRMC1 overexpression as the same as shown in PCC, which were reversed in PCC with shPGRMC1 transfection (Fig. 3 I). Taken together, our data showed that PGRMC1 expression was closely related to ferroptosis sensitivity to xCT inhibitors. PGRMC1 promotes ferroptosis via lipophagy and tubulin detyrosination PGRMC1 can promote autophagy by elevating cleaved LC3B levels [ 14 ]. Therefore, we examined whether PGRMC1 engaged in cytosolic lipophagy formation in cancer cells with PGRMC1 expression when exposed to ferroptosis inducers. Erastin treatment induced lipid droplet degradation by autophagy in PCC or parental cells with transfection of PGRMC1 overexpression vector or P4 treatment (Figs. 4 A– 4 D). The degradation of lipid droplets by erastin treatment was inhibited by the treatment of Wortmannin, an autophagy inhibitor. Conversely, erastin treatment minimally affected lipid droplet degradation and autophagosome formation in parental cells with vector transfection or PCC with the inhibition of PGRMC1 expression by transfection of shPGRMC1 vector or AG205 treatment. Cleaved LC3B increased and p62 decreased along with the autophagy process in the cancer cells with PGRMC1 expression (Fig. 4 C). Pharmacological regulation of PGRMC1 expression by P4 or AG205 in parental cells and PCC significantly affected ferroptosis sensitivity by xCT inhibitors in terms of cell viability, lipid peroxidation, and intracellular labile iron pool ( P < 0.01) (Fig. S5A–SF). PGRMC1 expression was also associated with increased autophagosome formation (Figs. 4 D). Free fatty acid contents significantly increased in parental cells with PGRMC1 overexpression or P4 treatment in addition to PCC, whereas those significantly decreased in PCC with PGRMC1 inhibition ( P < 0.001) (Fig. 4 F). In particular, PUFA contents increased in parental cells with PGRMC1 overexpression or PCC, which were reversed by PGRMC1 inhibition (Fig. 4 E). Conversely, monounsaturated fatty acid (MUFA) contents decreased in cancer cells with PGRMC1 expression or P4 treatment but increased in PCC with shPGRMC1 vector transfection or AG205 treatment. Next, we examined whether the detyrosination of α-tubulin by PGRMC1 contributed to lipophagy and ferroptosis sensitivity by xCT inhibitors because PGRMC1 is known to induce microtubule stability [ 23 ]. Detyrosinated α-tubulin levels increased with lipid droplets in PCC or parental cells with PGRMC1 overexpression or P4 treatment and decreased in parental cells with vector transfection or PCC with PGRMC1 inhibition (Fig. 5 A– 5 B). Erastin treatment significantly increased the levels of detyrosinated α-tubulin and degraded lipid droplets in PGRMC1 expressing or activating cells, which were inhibited by parthenolide (PTN), a sesquiterpene lactone inhibiting the activity of tubulin carboxypeptidases (TCP) [ 24 ] (Figs. 5 A– 5 B, and 5 E). The levels of SIRT1 mRNA and protein and pAMPK were elevated along with PGRMC1 expression (Fig. 5 C and 5 E). SIRT1 expression was increased by PGRMC1 overexpression in parental cells, which were silenced by siSIRT1 transfection (Fig. 5 F). The levels of pAMPK and detyrosinated α-tubulin were significantly increased by erastin treatment, which was reversed by siSIRT1 transfection. SIRT1 inhibition in parental cancer cells with PGRMC1 overexpression blocked autophagy, but SIRT1 activation in PCC with PGRMC1 inhibition induced autophagy, which was not affected by parthenolide treatment (Fig. 5 G). Taken together, our data showed that PGRMC1 promotes lipophagy and autophagy by increased tubulin detyrosination, which contributed to increased ferroptosis sensitivity in PCC. PGRMC1 expression increases FAO and ferroptosis sensitivity in vivo FAO can be promoted by contact between lipid droplets and mitochondria [ 25 ]. Therefore, we examined whether PGRMC1 involved the connection between lipid droplets and mitochondria for increasing FAO in cancer cells. Immunofluorescent staining showed that the co-staining of lipid droplets and mitochondria in parental cells with PGRMC1 overexpression or PCC, and lipid droplets were degraded by erastin treatment (Fig. 6 A). Mitochondrial ROS and FAO significantly increased in these cells with PGRMC1 expression and further were greatly boosted by erastin treatment, which was inhibited by PGRMC1 inhibition (Figs. 6 B– 6 F). This was accompanied by the changes of CPT1A, ATGL, and PLIN2 expression with or without PGRMC1 expression and erastin treatment (Fig. 6 G). Animal experiments showed that the in vivo tumor growth was promoted by PGRMC1 expression and was more significantly inhibited in the PGRMC1-expressing tumors by the treatment of sulfasalazine, an xCT inhibitor (Fig. 7 A– 7 E). Lipid droplets were more abundant in PGRMC1 overexpression or PCC tumors than low PGRMC1 expression tumors (Figs. 7 F– 7 G). Lipid droplets in tumors were reduced by sulfasalazine treatment. From the HNC patient cohort of TCGA datasets, PGRMC1 mRNA expression was significantly higher in HNC samples than normal mucosa ( P < 0.001) (Fig. 7 H). Overall survival was significantly lower in patients with high PGRMC1 expression than those with low PGRMC1 expression ( P < 0.001) (Fig. 7 I). Discussion The present study showed that PCC had PGRMC1 upregulation related to increased free fatty acids, lipid droplets, and FAO. PCC was highly sensitive to ferroptosis inducers inhibiting the xCT, such as erastin, sulfasalazine, and cyst(e)ine deprivation, but less sensitive to GPX4 inhibition by RSL3. Regulation of FAO or FAS in PCC modestly increases ferroptosis. Ferroptosis sensitivity to xCT inhibitors was reduced by PGRMC1 silencing in PCC and increased by PGRMC1 overexpression in parental cells. From xCT inhibitors in PCC, lipid droplets were substantially degraded by autophagic processes characterizing as lipophagy and by interaction with the mitochondria. This was facilitated by the increased tubulin detyrosination that was increased by SIRT1 activation but decreased by SIRT1 inhibition (Fig. 8 ). PGRMC1 expression elevated FAO and ferroptosis sensitivity from in vivo mice experiments with tumor transplantation. Therefore, our data suggest that PGRMC1 expression was characterized as the chemo-resistant property of PCC that was vulnerable to ferroptosis by xCT inhibitors. PCC showed a metabolic shift to FAO along with PGRMC1 upregulation. Alteration of cellular metabolism and lipid homeostasis mediates the chemoresistance of tumor cells to anti-cancer drugs [ 22 ]. Enhanced glutaminolysis increases the cellular levels of glutamine, glutamate, and GSH in breast cancer cells treated with paclitaxel [ 26 ]. Adipocyte and lipid metabolic reprogramming is a hallmark of resistant cancer cells: stores excessive energy as lipid droplets that can be broken down free fatty acids and transport into the mitochondria through accelerated FAO [ 27 ]. Paclitaxel induces cytotoxicity in tumor cells by binding to tubulin, stabilizing the microtubule, and preventing its disassembly, and selectively arresting the cell cycle in the G2/M phase [ 28 ]. Predictably, the disruption of microtubule dynamics alters the binding of paclitaxel to the microtubule, resulting in paclitaxel insensitivity in cancer cells [ 29 ]. PGRMC1 also directly interacts with tubulin, stabilizes the spindle microtubule, and affects mitosis through a microtubule-dependent process [ 23 ]. PGRMC1 expression promotes tumor growth and decreased the chemosensitivity of human xenograft tumors to paclitaxel [ 30 ]. The findings may hint the potential link between paclitaxel insensitivity and PGRMC1. Our data also supported that paclitaxel insensitivity in PCC was associated with the altered lipid metabolism and disoriented microtubule by its decreased stabilization, which was accompanied by the increased expression of PGRMC1. PCC was quite sensitive to ferroptosis inducers. Ferroptosis is a new form of necrosis based on the iron-dependent accumulation of excessive lipid peroxidation [ 10 ]. Accumulation of free fatty acids, PUFAs, is an essential prerequisite to produce lipid peroxidation by the phospholipid-binding of ROS from iron-mediated reactions of peroxides [ 8 ]. Altered lipid reprogramming characterized by increased free fatty acids, lipid droplets, and FAO in PCC may contribute to more vulnerability to ferroptosis compared with parental cells. Therapy-resistant persister cancer cells show a high-mesenchymal cell state and dependency on a lipid peroxidase pathway that causes the vulnerability to ferroptotic cell death [ 5 ]. This cell state involves the alteration of lipid metabolism characterized by the increased activity of enzymes that promote PUFA synthesis and by the high expression of ZEB1 that induces EMT in epithelial cancers [ 4 ]. Inhibition of a lipid peroxidase pathway GPX4 induces ferroptosis in therapy-resistant cancer cells and prevents tumor relapse in vivo [ 5 ]. In the present study, PCC was also vulnerable to ferroptotic cell death, particularly induced by the xCT inhibitors. The enhanced ferroptosis sensitivity might be in part explained by the increased free fatty acids and PUFA contents, lipid droplets, and FAO in PCC. However, ferroptosis was only modestly promoted by the regulation of FAO or FAS in PCC. Besides, there were some differences in ferroptosis sensitivity between xCT and GPX4 inhibitors. This needed to elucidate further mechanisms that explained the increased ferroptosis sensitivity in PCC. The present study showed that PGRMC1 involved lipophagy by increased tubulin detyrosination and interaction with the mitochondria. PGRMC1 involved the substantial degradation of lipid droplets along with the autophagic process of autophagosome formation and lipophagy. PGRMC1 promotes autophagy via direct binding to a key component of the autophagy machinery LC3 causing increased cleaved LC3 levels and the degradative activity of autophagy [ 14 ]. Lipophagy is an autophagic process targeting lipid droplets to break down in lysosomes that are degraded by promoting interaction between autophagosomal lipid droplets and lysosomes [ 31 ]. Lipid droplet dispersion can be involved in the lipophagic process that occurs on the detyrosinated microtubule to increased mitochondrial FAO via AMPK activation [ 32 ]. Lipid droplet lipolysis and autophagy move cytosolic fatty acids from lipid droplets to mitochondria via the fusion of lipid droplets and mitochondria [ 33 ]. Mitochondria fusion with lipid droplets induces lipid storage and utilization, resulting in simultaneous involvement in FAO and lipid droplets formation in cells [ 34 ]. Detyrosinated microtubules spatially interact with lysosomes, which increases autolysosomes, a fusion intermediate of autophagosomes and lysosomes, and play a role in carrying lipid droplets to break down in lysosomes and their utilization for mitochondrial FAO [ 35 ]. Besides, PGRMC1 expression alters genomic CpG methylation, such as NAD-dependent deacetylases, e.g. sirtuins [ 36 ]. SIRT1 activation might promote autophagy/lipophagy of lipid droplets via AMPK activation via cytosolic lipases such as ATGL [ 37 ]. Therefore, our data may support that PGRMC1-dependent lipophagy can be mediated by a SIRT1-AMPK axis. The present study has shown that PGRMC1 expression was a critical regulator of promoting ferroptosis in PCC. However, this study has several limitations. First, PGRMC1 plays diverse roles in the regulation of cytochrome P450, steroidogenesis, progesterone signaling, membrane trafficking, mitotic spindle and cell cycle regulation, and autophagy [ 12 ]. Activation of PGRMC1 may affect the functions of normal cells as well as cancer cells, which might induce ferroptotic cell death in both. Second, PCC showed high sensitivity to xCT inhibitors but relatively less sensitivity to GPX4 inhibitors. The current study has not fully elucidated key molecules or pathways that explain different sensitivities between xCT and GPX4 inhibitors. This might be a phenomenon localized in PCC and is dependent on GPX4 expression inhibited by cyst(e)ine metabolism [ 38 ]. This needs to be elucidated by further studies. Nonetheless, PGRMC1 expression in PCC promoted the sensitivity to ferroptosis inducers, which might be a promising strategy to eradicate persister cells surviving after conventional or targeted chemotherapy. Conclusion The present study suggests that PGRMC1 is required in order for xCT inhibitors to induce ferroptosis in PCC. PGRMC1 is a key regulator of being more vulnerable to ferroptosis in PCC than parental cells via lipophagy-dependent degradation of lipid droplets and mitochondrial FAO. Activation of PGRMC1 might be a potential strategy to kill recalcitrant cancer cells via promoting their ferroptosis susceptibility. Abbreviations CCK-8, cell counting kit-8; DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide; EMT, epithelial-mesenchymal transition; FFA, free fatty acid; FAO, fatty acid oxidation; FAS, fatty acid synthesis; GSH, glutathione; GPX4, Glutathione peroxidase 4; HNC, head and neck cancer; 4-HNE, 4-hydroxynonenal; LC3, microtubule-associated proteins 1 light chain 3; LIP, labile iron pool; 15-LOX, ALOX15, 15-lipoxygenase; MUFA, monounsaturated fatty acid; pAMPK, phospho-5' adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase; P4, progesterone; PCC, paclitaxel-tolerant persister cancer cells; PGRMC1, progesterone receptor membrane component 1; PUFA, polyunsaturated fatty acid; ROS, reactive oxygen species; sirtuin 1, SIRT1; xCT, system xc − cystine/glutamate antiporter. Declarations Ethics approval and consent to participate All animal studies were conducted under the guidelines of the Korean National Institutes of Health and were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of CHA University School of Medicine. Consent for publication Not applicable. Availability of data and materials The TCGA dataset regarding to PGRMC1 mRNA were available the cBioPortal for Cancer Genomics. The data in the current study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request. Competing interests All authors declare no conflict of interests. Funding This study was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant, funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT), The Government of Korea (No. 2019R1A2C2002259). Author contributions J.H.Y., J.L., and J.-L.R. conceived and designed the experiments. J.H.Y., J.L., and J.-L.R. performed the experiments. J.H.Y., J.L., and J.-L.R. analyzed the data. J.H.Y. and J.L. contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools. J.H.Y., J.L., and J.-L.R. wrote the draft, and checked and revised. All authors approved to submit this version to this publication. Acknowledgements Not applicable Authors’ information Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seongnam, Republic of Korea References Mullard A. Stemming the tide of drug resistance in cancer. Nature reviews Drug discovery. 2020;19:221–3. doi: 10.1038/d41573-020-00050-y . Sharma SV, Lee DY, Li B, Quinlan MP, Takahashi F, Maheswaran S, et al. A chromatin-mediated reversible drug-tolerant state in cancer cell subpopulations. Cell. 2010;141:69–80. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.02.027 . Boumahdi S, de Sauvage FJ. The great escape: tumour cell plasticity in resistance to targeted therapy. Nature reviews Drug discovery. 2020;19:39–56. doi: 10.1038/s41573-019-0044-1 . Viswanathan VS, Ryan MJ, Dhruv HD, Gill S, Eichhoff OM, Seashore-Ludlow B, et al. Dependency of a therapy-resistant state of cancer cells on a lipid peroxidase pathway. Nature. 2017;547:453–7. doi: 10.1038/nature23007 . Hangauer MJ, Viswanathan VS, Ryan MJ, Bole D, Eaton JK, Matov A, et al. Drug-tolerant persister cancer cells are vulnerable to GPX4 inhibition. Nature. 2017;551:247–50. doi: 10.1038/nature24297 . You JH, Lee J, Roh JL. Mitochondrial pyruvate carrier 1 regulates ferroptosis in drug-tolerant persister head and neck cancer cells via epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Cancer letters. 2021;507:40–54. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2021.03.013 . Angeli JPF, Shah R, Pratt DA, Conrad M. Ferroptosis Inhibition: Mechanisms and Opportunities. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2017;38:489–98. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2017.02.005 . Dixon SJ, Lemberg KM, Lamprecht MR, Skouta R, Zaitsev EM, Gleason CE, et al. Ferroptosis: an iron-dependent form of nonapoptotic cell death. Cell. 2012;149:1060–72. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.03.042 . Feng H, Stockwell BR. Unsolved mysteries: How does lipid peroxidation cause ferroptosis? PLoS Biol. 2018;16:e2006203. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2006203 . Stockwell BR, Friedmann Angeli JP, Bayir H, Bush AI, Conrad M, Dixon SJ, et al. Ferroptosis: A Regulated Cell Death Nexus Linking Metabolism, Redox Biology, and Disease. Cell. 2017;171:273–85. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.09.021 . Hughes AL, Powell DW, Bard M, Eckstein J, Barbuch R, Link AJ, et al. Dap1/PGRMC1 binds and regulates cytochrome P450 enzymes. Cell Metabol. 2007;5:143–9. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2006.12.009 . Cahill MA, Jazayeri JA, Catalano SM, Toyokuni S, Kovacevic Z, Richardson DR. The emerging role of progesterone receptor membrane component 1 (PGRMC1) in cancer biology. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2016;1866:339–49. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2016.07.004 . Crudden G, Loesel R, Craven RJ. Overexpression of the cytochrome p450 activator hpr6 (heme-1 domain protein/human progesterone receptor) in tumors. Tumour biology: the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology Medicine. 2005;26:142–6. doi: 10.1159/000086485 . Mir SU, Schwarze SR, Jin L, Zhang J, Friend W, Miriyala S, et al. Progesterone receptor membrane component 1/Sigma-2 receptor associates with MAP1LC3B and promotes autophagy. Autophagy. 2013;9:1566–78. doi: 10.4161/auto.25889 . Rohe HJ, Ahmed IS, Twist KE, Craven RJ. PGRMC1 (progesterone receptor membrane component 1): a targetable protein with multiple functions in steroid signaling, P450 activation and drug binding. Pharmacol Ther. 2009;121:14–9. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2008.09.006 . Kim SY, Chu KC, Lee HR, Lee KS, Carey TE. Establishment and characterization of nine new head and neck cancer cell lines. Acta oto-laryngologica. 1997;117:775–84. doi: 10.3109/00016489709113477 . Garcés R, Mancha M. One-step lipid extraction and fatty acid methyl esters preparation from fresh plant tissues. Anal Biochem. 1993;211:139–43. doi: 10.1006/abio.1993.1244 . Ishimoto T, Nagano O, Yae T, Tamada M, Motohara T, Oshima H, et al. CD44 variant regulates redox status in cancer cells by stabilizing the xCT subunit of system xc(-) and thereby promotes tumor growth. Cancer cell. 2011;19:387–400. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2011.01.038 . Ojima I, Lichtenthal B, Lee S, Wang C, Wang X. Taxane anticancer agents: a patent perspective. Expert Opin Ther Pat. 2016;26:1–20. doi: 10.1517/13543776.2016.1111872 . Qu Q, Zeng F, Liu X, Wang QJ, Deng F. Fatty acid oxidation and carnitine palmitoyltransferase I: emerging therapeutic targets in cancer. Cell death disease. 2016;7:e2226. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2016.132 . Gutierrez A, Pan L, Groen RW, Baleydier F, Kentsis A, Marineau J, et al. Phenothiazines induce PP2A-mediated apoptosis in T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Clin Investig. 2014;124:644–55. doi: 10.1172/jci65093 . Asperger H, Stamm N, Gierke B, Pawlak M, Hofmann U, Zanger UM, et al. Progesterone receptor membrane component 1 regulates lipid homeostasis and drives oncogenic signaling resulting in breast cancer progression. Breast cancer research: BCR. 2020;22:75. doi: 10.1186/s13058-020-01312-8 . Lodde V, Peluso JJ. A novel role for progesterone and progesterone receptor membrane component 1 in regulating spindle microtubule stability during rat and human ovarian cell mitosis. Biol Reprod. 2011;84:715–22. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.110.088385 . Fonrose X, Ausseil F, Soleilhac E, Masson V, David B, Pouny I, et al. Parthenolide inhibits tubulin carboxypeptidase activity. Cancer research. 2007;67:3371–8. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-06-3732 . Cui L, Liu P. Two Types of Contact Between Lipid Droplets and Mitochondria. Frontiers in cell developmental biology. 2020;8:618322. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.618322 . Stewart DA, Winnike JH, McRitchie SL, Clark RF, Pathmasiri WW, Sumner SJ. Metabolomics Analysis of Hormone-Responsive and Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cell Responses to Paclitaxel Identify Key Metabolic Differences. J Proteome Res. 2016;15:3225–40. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.6b00430 . Cao Y. Adipocyte and lipid metabolism in cancer drug resistance. J Clin Investig. 2019;129:3006–17. doi: 10.1172/jci127201 . Barbuti AM, Chen ZS. Paclitaxel Through the Ages of Anticancer Therapy: Exploring Its Role in Chemoresistance and Radiation Therapy. Cancers. 2015;7:2360–71. doi: 10.3390/cancers7040897 . Orr GA, Verdier-Pinard P, McDaid H, Horwitz SB. Mechanisms of Taxol resistance related to microtubules. Oncogene. 2003;22:7280–95. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1206934 . Friel AM, Zhang L, Pru CA, Clark NC, McCallum ML, Blok LJ, et al. Progesterone receptor membrane component 1 deficiency attenuates growth while promoting chemosensitivity of human endometrial xenograft tumors. Cancer letters. 2015;356:434–42. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2014.09.036 . Schroeder B, Schulze RJ, Weller SG, Sletten AC, Casey CA, McNiven MA. The small GTPase Rab7 as a central regulator of hepatocellular lipophagy. Hepatology. 2015;61:1896–907. doi: 10.1002/hep.27667 . Herms A, Bosch M, Reddy BJ, Schieber NL, Fajardo A, Rupérez C, et al. AMPK activation promotes lipid droplet dispersion on detyrosinated microtubules to increase mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation. Nature communications. 2015;6:7176. doi: 10.1038/ncomms8176 . Rambold AS, Cohen S, Lippincott-Schwartz J. Fatty acid trafficking in starved cells: regulation by lipid droplet lipolysis, autophagy, and mitochondrial fusion dynamics. Developmental cell. 2015;32:678–92. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2015.01.029 . Benador IY, Veliova M, Liesa M, Shirihai OS. Mitochondria Bound to Lipid Droplets: Where Mitochondrial Dynamics Regulate Lipid Storage and Utilization. Cell Metabol. 2019;29:827–35. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2019.02.011 . Mohan N, Sorokina EM, Verdeny IV, Alvarez AS, Lakadamyali M. Detyrosinated microtubules spatially constrain lysosomes facilitating lysosome-autophagosome fusion. J Cell Biol. 2019;218:632–43. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201807124 . Thejer BM, Adhikary PP, Teakel SL, Fang J, Weston PA, Gurusinghe S, et al. PGRMC1 effects on metabolism, genomic mutation and CpG methylation imply crucial roles in animal biology and disease. BMC molecular cell biology. 2020;21:26. doi: 10.1186/s12860-020-00268-z . Sathyanarayan A, Mashek MT, Mashek DG. ATGL Promotes Autophagy/Lipophagy via SIRT1 to Control Hepatic Lipid Droplet Catabolism. Cell reports. 2017;19:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.03.026 . Lee N, Carlisle AE, Peppers A, Park SJ, Doshi MB, Spears ME, et al. xCT-Driven Expression of GPX4 Determines Sensitivity of Breast Cancer Cells to Ferroptosis Inducers. Antioxidants (Basel Switzerland). 2021;10. doi: 10.3390/antiox10020317 . Supplementary Files SupplementaryData.docx Cite Share Download PDF Status: Under Review Version 1 posted Editorial decision: Major revision 30 Sep, 2021 Review # 3 received at journal 29 Sep, 2021 Review # 2 received at journal 28 Sep, 2021 Reviewer # 3 agreed at journal 17 Sep, 2021 Reviewer # 2 agreed at journal 16 Sep, 2021 Review # 1 received at journal 29 Aug, 2021 Reviews received at journal 19 Aug, 2021 Reviewers invited by journal 19 Aug, 2021 Editor assigned by journal 18 Aug, 2021 Reviewer # 1 agreed at journal 18 Aug, 2021 Submission checks completed at journal 18 Aug, 2021 Editor invited by journal 18 Aug, 2021 First submitted to journal 12 Aug, 2021 You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {\"props\":{\"pageProps\":{\"initialData\":{\"identity\":\"rs-810226\",\"acceptedTermsAndConditions\":true,\"allowDirectSubmit\":false,\"archivedVersions\":[],\"articleType\":\"Research Article\",\"associatedPublications\":[],\"authors\":[{\"id\":47067680,\"identity\":\"4f4132c3-3b12-41f6-a676-8872fbf9e3a7\",\"order_by\":0,\"name\":\"Ji Hyeon You\",\"email\":\"\",\"orcid\":\"\",\"institution\":\"CHA Bundang Medical Center\",\"correspondingAuthor\":false,\"submittingAuthor\":false,\"prefix\":\"\",\"firstName\":\"Ji\",\"middleName\":\"Hyeon\",\"lastName\":\"You\",\"suffix\":\"\"},{\"id\":47067681,\"identity\":\"2889fae3-06e5-4184-a9a9-fd6f452d5409\",\"order_by\":1,\"name\":\"Jaewang Lee\",\"email\":\"\",\"orcid\":\"\",\"institution\":\"CHA Bundang Medical Center\",\"correspondingAuthor\":false,\"submittingAuthor\":false,\"prefix\":\"\",\"firstName\":\"Jaewang\",\"middleName\":\"\",\"lastName\":\"Lee\",\"suffix\":\"\"},{\"id\":47067682,\"identity\":\"ec59f8a8-0067-46fc-85ee-0ce6b6f9a153\",\"order_by\":2,\"name\":\"Jong-Lyel Roh\",\"email\":\"\",\"orcid\":\"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1537-1977\",\"institution\":\"Bundang CHA Medical Center\",\"correspondingAuthor\":true,\"submittingAuthor\":false,\"prefix\":\"\",\"firstName\":\"Jong-Lyel\",\"middleName\":\"\",\"lastName\":\"Roh\",\"suffix\":\"\"}],\"badges\":[],\"createdAt\":\"2021-08-13 10:57:35\",\"currentVersionCode\":1,\"declarations\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.21203/rs.3.rs-810226/v1\",\"doiUrl\":\"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-810226/v1\",\"draftVersion\":[],\"editorialEvents\":[],\"editorialNote\":\"\",\"failedWorkflow\":false,\"files\":[{\"id\":12680373,\"identity\":\"e08f4a1b-c44a-4974-8461-750ab4721637\",\"added_by\":\"auto\",\"created_at\":\"2021-08-23 15:02:10\",\"extension\":\"png\",\"order_by\":1,\"title\":\"Figure 1\",\"display\":\"\",\"copyAsset\":false,\"role\":\"figure\",\"size\":2604051,\"visible\":true,\"origin\":\"\",\"legend\":\"Paclitaxel-tolerant persister cancer cells (PCC) have a metabolic shift to fatty acid oxidation. (A) PCC was made from HN3 and HN4 cells using 10 nM paclitaxel for 6 days and then was maintained without paclitaxel for 38 days before the second 6-day drug treatment to get re-derived PCC. Scale bar 10 μm. (B) Cell viability was measured using cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8) assay after 10 nM paclitaxel treatment for 48 h in parental cells (ctr) and PCC. Data are means and s.d. from three technical replicates. **P \\u003c 0.01, ***P \\u003c 0.001 relative to DMSO control. (C) Immunostaining of α-tubulin (green) in HN3 and HN4 parental cells and PCC. Nuclei (blue) were stained with 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). Scale bar 10 μm. (D–E) Extracellular acidification rate (ECAR) assay in HN3 and HN4 parental cells and PCC. ECAR was measured using a microplate fluorometer at 15 min intervals and the glycolysis effect was examined from ECAR assay at 120 min. **P \\u003c 0.01 relative to parental cells. (F) Cellular glutamate was quantified in parental cells and PCC. **P \\u003c 0.01 relative to parental cells. (G–I) Free fatty acids and fatty acid oxidation (FAO) were measured in parental cells and PCC. FAO was quantified via assessing changes in oxygen consumption (OCR) and calculated as a formula (sample untreated with etomoxir minus sample treated with 10 μM etomoxir). Data are means and s.d. and from three technical replicates. **P \\u003c 0.01 relative to parental cells. (J–L) Oil red O staining, immunoblotting, and lipid droplet staining in parental cells and PCC. Scale bars 100 μm (J) and 10 μm (L).\",\"description\":\"\",\"filename\":\"Figure1.png\",\"url\":\"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-810226/v1/c6174606531bfb83d226e474.png\"},{\"id\":12680371,\"identity\":\"086727f0-4bb8-4636-aed1-e981e3112c10\",\"added_by\":\"auto\",\"created_at\":\"2021-08-23 15:02:10\",\"extension\":\"png\",\"order_by\":2,\"title\":\"Figure 2\",\"display\":\"\",\"copyAsset\":false,\"role\":\"figure\",\"size\":4622052,\"visible\":true,\"origin\":\"\",\"legend\":\"PCC is vulnerable to xCT inhibitors. (A–C) Cell death and viability assays in HN4 parental cells and PCC. Cell death was assessed using SYTOXTM Green stain in the cells treated with or without 2 μM ferrostatin-1 plus 1 µM RSL3, 10 µM erastin, 0.5 mM sulfasalazine (SAS), or cyst(e)ine deprivation for 48 h. Dead cells were quantified by counting SYTOX Green positive cells. Cell viability was examined using a CCK-8 assay. Scale bar 100 μm. Data are means and s.d. from three technical replicates. ns, non-significance; *P \\u003c 0.05, **P \\u003c 0.01, ***P \\u003c 0.001 relative to PCC. (D) Lipid peroxidation was examined using BODIPYTM C11 and fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) in parental cells and PCC after exposure to the ferroptosis inducers of 1 µM RSL3, 10 µM erastin, 0.5 mM SAS, and cyst(e)ine deprivation for 8 h. *P \\u003c 0.05 , **P \\u003c 0.01 relative to parental cells. (E–F) Relative glutathione (GSH) and free fatty acid contents in parental cells and PCC after treatment with ferroptosis inducers for 24 h; 1 µM RSL3, 10 µM erastin, 0.5 mM SAS, or cyst(e)ine deprivation. *P \\u003c 0.05, **P \\u003c 0.01 relative to parental cells. (G–H) FAO in parental cells and PCC with or without 10 µM erastin was quantified via assessing changes in OCR when exposed to etomoxir or not. *P \\u003c 0.05, **P \\u003c 0.01 relative to parental cells. (I–J) Oil red O staining and immunoblotting in parental cells and PCC after treatment with ferroptosis inducers for 24 h; 1 µM RSL3, 10 µM erastin, 0.5 mM SAS, and cyst(e)ine deprivation. Scale bar 100 μm.\",\"description\":\"\",\"filename\":\"Figure2.png\",\"url\":\"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-810226/v1/058d9edb98a8a716bff159d7.png\"},{\"id\":12680374,\"identity\":\"1a642916-7389-46b6-9151-580c4cdc8718\",\"added_by\":\"auto\",\"created_at\":\"2021-08-23 15:02:10\",\"extension\":\"png\",\"order_by\":3,\"title\":\"Figure 3\",\"display\":\"\",\"copyAsset\":false,\"role\":\"figure\",\"size\":665940,\"visible\":true,\"origin\":\"\",\"legend\":\"PGRMC1 expression induces ferroptosis. (A–B) Immunoblotting in HN4PCC with vector or shPGRMC1 transfection (A) and HN4 parental cells with control or PGRMC1 overexpression vector transfection (B). (C–E) Cell viability, lipid peroxidation, and labile iron pool in the PCC with vector or shPGRMC1. The cells were examined after treatment with ferroptosis inducers: 1 µM RSL3, 10 µM erastin, 0.5 mM SAS, and cyst(e)ine deprivation for 48 h for cell viability and 8 h for lipid peroxidation and labile iron pool. Data are means and s.d. from three technical replicates. *P \\u003c 0.05, **P \\u003c 0.01, ***P \\u003c 0.001 relative to vector control. (F–H) Cell viability, lipid peroxidation, and labile iron pool in HN4 parental cells and PGRMC1 overexpression cells were detected after treatment with ferroptosis inducers: 1 µM RSL3, 10 µM erastin, 0.5 mM SAS. *P \\u003c 0.05, **P \\u003c 0.01, ***P \\u003c 0.001 relative to vector control. (I) Immunoblotting in HN4 parental cells with control or PGRMC1 overexpression vector transfection and HN4PCC with vector or shPGRMC1 transfection.\",\"description\":\"\",\"filename\":\"Figure3.png\",\"url\":\"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-810226/v1/ae8d902011664429cf6aaadc.png\"},{\"id\":12680664,\"identity\":\"db4e45e4-c4fd-4329-ba33-622e312edcf6\",\"added_by\":\"auto\",\"created_at\":\"2021-08-23 15:05:10\",\"extension\":\"png\",\"order_by\":4,\"title\":\"Figure 4\",\"display\":\"\",\"copyAsset\":false,\"role\":\"figure\",\"size\":4237221,\"visible\":true,\"origin\":\"\",\"legend\":\"PGRMC1 promotes ferroptosis via lipophagy. (A–B) Lipid droplets in HN4 parental cells and PCC with or without erastin treatment. HN4 cells were transfected with control (vtr) or PGRMC1 overexpression (O/E) vector or treated with 100 nM progesterone (P4). HN4PCC were transfected with vector or shPGRMC1 or treated with 20 µM AG205, a PGRMC1 antagonist. The cells were also treated with or without 30 nM Wortmannin plus DMSO or 10 µM erastin for 24 h. Lipid droplets (green) were quantified using ImageJ, which were displayed as a heatmap relative to PCC vector control. Scale bar 10 μm. (C) Immunoblotting in HN4 parental cells and PCC with or without PGRMC1 overexpression or inhibition and with DMSO or 10 µM erastin treatment for 24 h. (D) Co-staining of LysotrackerTM Deep Red and LC3-GFP (green) in HN4 parental cells and PCC with or without PGRMC1 overexpression or inhibition and with DMSO or 10 µM erastin for 4 h. Nuclei (blue) were stained with DAPI. Scale bar 10 μm. (E–F) Quantification of cellular lipid contents by gas chromatography and mass spectrometer (GC-MS) and of free fatty acids in HN4 parental cells and PCC with or without PGRMC1 overexpression or inhibition. The GC-MS data were normalized to HN4 vector control. O/E, PGRMC1 overexpression vector; sh, shPGRMC1; SFA, saturated fatty acids; MUFA, monounsaturated fatty acids; PUFA, polyunsaturated fatty acids. Data are means and s.d. from three technical replicates. ***P \\u003c 0.001 relative vector control.\",\"description\":\"\",\"filename\":\"Figure4.png\",\"url\":\"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-810226/v1/5dbe9350309576eaf7992958.png\"},{\"id\":12680665,\"identity\":\"4867baa1-6ff0-41bf-872e-f51a45825606\",\"added_by\":\"auto\",\"created_at\":\"2021-08-23 15:05:10\",\"extension\":\"png\",\"order_by\":5,\"title\":\"Figure 5\",\"display\":\"\",\"copyAsset\":false,\"role\":\"figure\",\"size\":4559922,\"visible\":true,\"origin\":\"\",\"legend\":\"PGRMC1 promotes lipophagy via increased tubulin detyrosination. (A) Co-staining of lipid droplet (LD, green) and detyrosinated α-tubulin (red) in HN4 parental cells and PCC with or without PGRMC1 overexpression or inhibition. HN4 cells were transfected with control or PGRMC1 overexpression vector or treated with 100 nM P4. HN4PCC were transfected with vector or shPGRMC1, or 20 µM AG205. The cells were also treated with DMSO, 10 µM erastin, or 10 µM erastin plus 20 µM parthenolide (PTN), a sesquiterpene lactone inhibiting the activity of tubulin carboxypeptidase (TCP) [24], for 24 h. Nuclei (blue) were stained with DAPI. Scale bar 5 μm. (B) An illustration showing the relation between tubulin detyrosination and lipophagy. (C–D) mRNA expression (C) and genomic DNA methylation levels (D) in HN4 parental cells and PCC with or without PGRMC1 overexpression or inhibition. Data are means and s.d. from three technical replicates. **P \\u003c 0.01 relative to vector control. (E–F) Immunoblotting in HN4 parental cells and PCC with or without PGRMC1 overexpression or inhibition and with DMSO or 10 µM erastin for 24 h. HN4 cells with control or PGRMC1 overexpression vector transfection were also transfected with scrambled or SIRT1 siRNA and then, treated with DMSO or 10 µM erastin for 24 h (F). (G) Co-staining for PGRMC1 (magenta), LC3-GFP (green), and nuclei (blue) in the cells treated with 10 μM EX527 (a selective SIRT1 inhibitor), 5 μM SRT1720 (a selective SIRT1 activator), 10 µM erastin, 20 µM PTN, or their combinations for 24 h. Scale bar 5 μm.\",\"description\":\"\",\"filename\":\"Figure5.png\",\"url\":\"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-810226/v1/510bd9141b8c00ee2ed5b0ec.png\"},{\"id\":12680379,\"identity\":\"86d0f24f-316f-4b70-b132-8576be69cb31\",\"added_by\":\"auto\",\"created_at\":\"2021-08-23 15:02:10\",\"extension\":\"png\",\"order_by\":6,\"title\":\"Figure 6\",\"display\":\"\",\"copyAsset\":false,\"role\":\"figure\",\"size\":3650145,\"visible\":true,\"origin\":\"\",\"legend\":\"PGRMC1 increases FAO by anchoring lipid droplets to mitochondria. (A) Co-staining of mitotracker (orange), lipid droplets (LD, green), and PGRMC1 (red) in HN4 parental cells and PCC with or without 10 µM erastin treatment for 24 h. HN4 cells were transfected with control or PGRMC1 overexpression vector or treated with 100 nM P4. HN4PCC were transfected with vector or shPGRMC1 or treated with 20 µM AG205. Scale bar 5 μm. (B) Mitochondrial ROS was examined using incubation with 5 μM mitoSOXTM Red and FACS in HN4 parental cells and PCC with or without PGRMC1 overexpression or inhibition and with DMSO or 10 µM erastin for 8 h. Data are means and s.d. from three technical replicates. *P \\u003c 0.05, **P \\u003c 0.01, ***P \\u003c 0.001 relative to DMSO control or between different groups. (C–F) Quantification of FAO in HN4 parental cells and PCC with or without PGRMC1 overexpression or inhibition and with DMSO or 10 µM erastin. *P \\u003c 0.05, **P \\u003c 0.01 relative to DMSO control. (G) Immunoblotting in HN4 parental cells and PCC with or without PGRMC1 overexpression or inhibition and with DMSO or 10 µM erastin for 24 h. O/E, PGRMC1 overexpression vector; sh, shPGRMC1; P4, progesterone; AG, AG205.\",\"description\":\"\",\"filename\":\"Figure6.png\",\"url\":\"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-810226/v1/6aa18ac435212016794515d4.png\"},{\"id\":12680377,\"identity\":\"5587cdf1-907d-4593-8878-7e6f161f4cf2\",\"added_by\":\"auto\",\"created_at\":\"2021-08-23 15:02:10\",\"extension\":\"png\",\"order_by\":7,\"title\":\"Figure 7\",\"display\":\"\",\"copyAsset\":false,\"role\":\"figure\",\"size\":2661489,\"visible\":true,\"origin\":\"\",\"legend\":\"PGRMC1 expression increases ferroptosis sensitivity in vivo. (A–E) Representative images, tumor weights, and tumor volumes in HN4 parental cells and PCC with or without vector, PGRMC1 overexpression, or shPGRMC1 transfection and vehicle or SAS treatment. *P \\u003c 0.05, **P \\u003c 0.01 relative to vehicle control or between different groups. (F–G) Lipid droplet staining of tumors. Lipid droplets (green) were quantified using ImageJ and were normalized to HN4PCC vector control. Scale bar 100 μm. (H) Comparison of PGRMC1 mRNA expression between normal mucosa and tumor samples in the HNC patient cohort from TCGA datasets. t-test, P \\u003c 0.001. (I) Kaplan-Meier curves estimating overall survival (OS) according to patients with low and high expression levels of tumor PGRMC1 mRNA (cutoff = 34.57) from the TCGA datasets. Log-rank test, P \\u003c 0.001.\",\"description\":\"\",\"filename\":\"Figure7.png\",\"url\":\"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-810226/v1/bbe67fad102999eead9ffd75.png\"},{\"id\":12680666,\"identity\":\"53635f32-b376-4afc-913e-028da986b745\",\"added_by\":\"auto\",\"created_at\":\"2021-08-23 15:05:10\",\"extension\":\"png\",\"order_by\":8,\"title\":\"Figure 8\",\"display\":\"\",\"copyAsset\":false,\"role\":\"figure\",\"size\":882689,\"visible\":true,\"origin\":\"\",\"legend\":\"An illustration showing that PGRMC1 expression promotes ferroptosis in PCC. PCC has increased PGRMC1 expression related to increased free fatty acid acids (FFA), lipid droplets (LD), and fatty acid oxidation (FAO). PGRMC1 expression increased FAO and ferroptosis sensitivity by xCT inhibitors via lipophagy and tubulin detyrosination.\",\"description\":\"\",\"filename\":\"Figure8.png\",\"url\":\"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-810226/v1/d7f98c9c87db97f924f00cc7.png\"},{\"id\":13710558,\"identity\":\"e6f0a13f-0626-4982-af39-3b420dfacbf3\",\"added_by\":\"auto\",\"created_at\":\"2021-09-17 14:18:33\",\"extension\":\"pdf\",\"order_by\":0,\"title\":\"\",\"display\":\"\",\"copyAsset\":false,\"role\":\"manuscript-pdf\",\"size\":5690461,\"visible\":true,\"origin\":\"\",\"legend\":\"\",\"description\":\"\",\"filename\":\"manuscript.pdf\",\"url\":\"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-810226/v1/8fe24549-345c-45d5-8d2d-1ccbef880503.pdf\"},{\"id\":12680376,\"identity\":\"8587e2df-4a62-42e0-94e8-9956f6b6b297\",\"added_by\":\"auto\",\"created_at\":\"2021-08-23 15:02:10\",\"extension\":\"docx\",\"order_by\":12,\"title\":\"\",\"display\":\"\",\"copyAsset\":false,\"role\":\"supplement\",\"size\":12128721,\"visible\":true,\"origin\":\"\",\"legend\":\"\",\"description\":\"\",\"filename\":\"SupplementaryData.docx\",\"url\":\"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-810226/v1/0a599ed879947464a887b671.docx\"}],\"financialInterests\":\"\",\"formattedTitle\":\"PGRMC1-dependent lipophagy promotes ferroptosis in paclitaxel-tolerant persister cancer cells\",\"fulltext\":[{\"header\":\"Condensed Abstract\",\"content\":\"\\u003cp\\u003ePaclitaxel-tolerant persister cancer cells (PCC) had PGRMC1 upregulation related to increased free fatty acids, lipid droplets, and fatty acid oxidation. PGRMC1 expression substantially increased ferroptosis by xCT inhibition via lipophagy and tubulin detyrosination, whereas PGRMC1 silencing decreased ferroptosis: this suggests that PGRMC1 expression promotes ferroptosis in PCC.\\u003c/p\\u003e\"},{\"header\":\"Background\",\"content\":\"\\u003cp\\u003eDespite the development of various anti-cancer agents, cancer cells can evade effective treatment via some of the ways from pre-existing resistance, de novo mutations, and drug-tolerant persisters [\\u003cspan citationid=\\\"CR1\\\" class=\\\"CitationRef\\\"\\u003e1\\u003c/span\\u003e]. Drug-tolerant persister cancer cells are small surviving fractions evading from chemotherapeutic drugs that cause a major drawback of conventional or targeted therapy. A slow glowing persister cancer cells are more resistant to anti-cancer drugs [\\u003cspan citationid=\\\"CR2\\\" class=\\\"CitationRef\\\"\\u003e2\\u003c/span\\u003e]. Tumor cell plasticity in response to treatment toxicity is attended with the donning molecular disguise of genetic, transcriptional, chromatin, epigenetic, and microenvironmental reprogramming that may be targeted to kill persister cancer cells [\\u003cspan citationid=\\\"CR3\\\" class=\\\"CitationRef\\\"\\u003e3\\u003c/span\\u003e]. Understanding the resistant mechanisms can lead to incremental innovation for the development of effective anti-cancer strategies. Drug-tolerant persister cancer cells have characteristics of a high mesenchymal cell state dependent on a lipid peroxidase pathway involving glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4) [\\u003cspan citationid=\\\"CR4\\\" class=\\\"CitationRef\\\"\\u003e4\\u003c/span\\u003e]. Acquired drug resistance can be overcome by ferroptosis inducers targeting xCT or GPX4 which is the major regulator of ferroptosis [\\u003cspan citationid=\\\"CR5\\\" class=\\\"CitationRef\\\"\\u003e5\\u003c/span\\u003e, \\u003cspan citationid=\\\"CR6\\\" class=\\\"CitationRef\\\"\\u003e6\\u003c/span\\u003e].\\u003c/p\\u003e \\u003cp\\u003eLipid peroxidase pathway utilizes glutathione (GSH) which is a seminal cellular antioxidant for eliminating lipid reactive oxygen species (ROS) [\\u003cspan citationid=\\\"CR7\\\" class=\\\"CitationRef\\\"\\u003e7\\u003c/span\\u003e]. GSH is generated from cysteine transported by system xc\\u003csup\\u003e\\u0026minus;\\u003c/sup\\u003e cystine/glutamate antiporter (xCT) [\\u003cspan citationid=\\\"CR7\\\" class=\\\"CitationRef\\\"\\u003e7\\u003c/span\\u003e]. Polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) are essential sources to produce lipid peroxidation by multiple inner bonds of ROS [\\u003cspan citationid=\\\"CR8\\\" class=\\\"CitationRef\\\"\\u003e8\\u003c/span\\u003e]. Consequently, excessive lipid peroxidation disturbs cellular membrane integrity and causes cell death [\\u003cspan citationid=\\\"CR9\\\" class=\\\"CitationRef\\\"\\u003e9\\u003c/span\\u003e]. Ferrous iron catalyzes the Fenton reaction as an electron donor, which contributes to the iron-dependent accumulation of excessive lipid peroxidation, leading to a new form of necrotic cell death, ferroptosis [\\u003cspan citationid=\\\"CR10\\\" class=\\\"CitationRef\\\"\\u003e10\\u003c/span\\u003e].\\u003c/p\\u003e \\u003cp\\u003eProgesterone receptor membrane component 1 (PGRMC1) is a heme-binding protein that binds and modulates the activity of cytochrome P450 enzymes, which may impact multiple biochemical pathways and drug metabolism [\\u003cspan citationid=\\\"CR11\\\" class=\\\"CitationRef\\\"\\u003e11\\u003c/span\\u003e]. PGRMC1 involves the diverse functions of steroidogenesis, progesterone (P4) signaling, membrane trafficking, and mitotic spindle and cell cycle regulation [\\u003cspan citationid=\\\"CR12\\\" class=\\\"CitationRef\\\"\\u003e12\\u003c/span\\u003e]. Increased PGRMC1 expression is found in a variety of tumors including lung, colon, thyroid, breast, ovary, and cervix [\\u003cspan citationid=\\\"CR13\\\" class=\\\"CitationRef\\\"\\u003e13\\u003c/span\\u003e]. Besides, PGRMC1 induces autophagy via binding to microtubule-associated proteins 1 light chain 3 (LC3), an essential component for the degradative activity of autophagy [\\u003cspan citationid=\\\"CR14\\\" class=\\\"CitationRef\\\"\\u003e14\\u003c/span\\u003e]. PGRMC1 expression influences altered lipid and glycolytic metabolism, resistances to apoptosis by chemotherapeutic agents, epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), invasion, and metastasis [\\u003cspan citationid=\\\"CR12\\\" class=\\\"CitationRef\\\"\\u003e12\\u003c/span\\u003e]. PGRMC1 also involves in hormone and cholesterol synthesis, and drug metabolism, which mediates chemoresistance [\\u003cspan citationid=\\\"CR15\\\" class=\\\"CitationRef\\\"\\u003e15\\u003c/span\\u003e].\\u003c/p\\u003e \\u003cp\\u003eIncreased PGRMC1 expression is found in multiple types of resistant cancers but the role of PGRMC1 in cancer cell ferroptosis remains unrevealed. We developed drug-tolerant persister cancer cells from parental head and neck cancer (HNC) cells. The persister cells exhibited a highly increased expression of PGRMC1 that might contribute to the acquisition of drug resistance but became vulnerable to ferroptosis by xCT inhibitors. Therefore, we examined the role of PGRMC1 in promoting ferroptosis in paclitaxel-tolerant persister cancer cells (PCC).\\u003c/p\\u003e\"},{\"header\":\"Methods\",\"content\":\"\\u003cdiv id=\\\"Sec3\\\" class=\\\"Section2\\\"\\u003e \\u003ch2\\u003eCell culture and drug-tolerant persister cancer cell derivation\\u003c/h2\\u003e \\u003cp\\u003eHNC cell lines, namely AMC HN3 and HN4, were used for our experiments [\\u003cspan citationid=\\\"CR16\\\" class=\\\"CitationRef\\\"\\u003e16\\u003c/span\\u003e]. The cell lines were authenticated by short tandem repeat-based DNA fingerprinting and multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The cells were cultured in Eagle's minimum essential medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, penicillin, and streptomycin at 37\\u0026deg;C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO\\u003csub\\u003e2\\u003c/sub\\u003e. Drug-tolerant persister cancer cells were derived from HN3 and HN4 cells with 10 nM paclitaxel (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Paclitaxel was treated for 6 days with a new drug added every 3 days and this was repeated in regrown cells after no treatment for 38 days. Re-derived persister and parental cells were used in experiments. PCC was selected by 10 nM paclitaxel every 2 weeks to maintain drug tolerance characteristics.\\u003c/p\\u003e \\u003c/div\\u003e \\u003cdiv id=\\\"Sec4\\\" class=\\\"Section2\\\"\\u003e \\u003ch2\\u003eCell viability and death assays\\u003c/h2\\u003e \\u003cp\\u003eCell viability was measured in the cells that were subjected to (1S,3R)-RSL3) (19288; Cayman Chemical Co., Ann Arbor, MI, USA), erastin (S7242; Selleckchem, Houston, TX, USA), sulfasalazine (S0883; Sigma-Aldrich), or an equivalent amount of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), or were cultured in the conditioned media with no cysteine and cystine (cyst(e)ine, 1641454; MP Biomedicals, Irvine, CA, USA). After exposure, cell viability was assessed using cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8) (CK04; Dojindo Molecular Technologies, Inc., Tokyo, Japan) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The cells were incubated with the CCK-8 solution for 1 h, and then the cell viability was measured at the absorbance of 450 nm using a SpectraMax M2 microplate reader (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA).\\u003c/p\\u003e \\u003cp\\u003eAfter exposure to the agents, cell death was assessed via SYTOX Green (S34860; Thermo Fisher Scientific) staining. The samples were washed three times with Hanks' balanced salt solution without calcium and magnesium (HBSS, 14025076; Thermo Fisher Scientific), followed by staining of cells in each plate with 5 \\u0026micro;M SYTOX Green in HBSS for 20 min. The stained cells were observed using a ZEISS fluorescent microscope (Axiovert 200M; Oberkochen, Germany) and analyzed using ImageJ software (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA). The mean SYTOX Green-positive fractions were compared with those of the control group.\\u003c/p\\u003e \\u003c/div\\u003e \\u003cdiv id=\\\"Sec5\\\" class=\\\"Section2\\\"\\u003e \\u003ch2\\u003eMeasurement of lipid and mitochondrial reactive oxygen species\\u003c/h2\\u003e \\u003cp\\u003eLipid reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation was measured by adding 5 \\u0026micro;M BODIPY\\u0026trade; 581/591 C11 (a lipid peroxidation sensor, D3861; Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 30 min at 37\\u0026deg;C. The ROS levels were analyzed using a CytoFLEX flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA), (non)oxidized and oxidized forms were confirmed by ZEISS fluorescent microscope. Image quantification was performed using ImageJ software. For mitochondrial ROS, cells were seeded in 60 mm dishes. After indicated drug treatment, cells were incubated with 5 \\u0026micro;M mitoSOX\\u0026trade; Red (M36008; Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 20 min. MitoSOX\\u0026trade; Red was measured by ZEISS fluorescent microscope. The quantification of fluorescence intensity was performed using ImageJ software.\\u003c/p\\u003e \\u003c/div\\u003e \\u003cdiv id=\\\"Sec6\\\" class=\\\"Section2\\\"\\u003e \\u003ch2\\u003eGlycolysis and glutamate assays\\u003c/h2\\u003e \\u003cp\\u003eGlycolysis assay was measured using a glycolysis assay kit (ab197244; Abcam) at 380 nm excitation and 615 nm emission using a SpectraMax M2 microplate reader. The glycolytic effect was calculated through extracellular acidification (ECAR) using a microplate fluorometer at 15 min intervals and was examined from ECAR assay at 120 min. All examinations were operated on in 5\\u0026times;10\\u003csup\\u003e5\\u003c/sup\\u003e cells per sample following the manufacturer\\u0026rsquo;s protocol. Glutamate contents were measured using a glutamate assay kit (ab83389; Abcam) following the manufacture\\u0026rsquo;s protocol.\\u003c/p\\u003e \\u003c/div\\u003e \\u003cdiv id=\\\"Sec7\\\" class=\\\"Section2\\\"\\u003e \\u003ch2\\u003eMeasurement of GSH synthesis and intracellular iron\\u003c/h2\\u003e \\u003cp\\u003eIntracellular GSH levels in HNC cell lysates were measured using a GSH/GSSG assay kit (EGTT-100; BioAssay Systems, Hayward, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions.\\u003c/p\\u003e \\u003cp\\u003eLabile iron pool (LIP) assay was measured by using calcein acetoxymethyl ester (354217; Corning Inc., Corning, NY, USA) and iron chelator, deferoxamine (ab120727; Abcam, Cambridge, UK). The cells were loaded with calcein-AM (8 \\u0026micro;g/ml) for 30 min at 37\\u0026deg;C and then washed with HBSS. Deferoxamine was added at a final concentration of 100 \\u0026micro;M to remove iron from calcein, causing dequenching. The change in fluorescence following the addition of deferoxamine was used as an indirect measure of the LIP. Fluorescence was measured at 485 nm excitation and 535 nm emission with a VICTOR X3 microplate reader (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA) and ZEISS fluorescent microscope.\\u003c/p\\u003e \\u003c/div\\u003e \\u003cdiv id=\\\"Sec8\\\" class=\\\"Section2\\\"\\u003e \\u003ch2\\u003eMeasurements of autophagic flux\\u003c/h2\\u003e \\u003cp\\u003eThe cells were seeded and were treated with erastin or other agents with or without 30 nM Wortmannin (W1628; Sigma-Aldrich). Also, autophagy-related molecules were confirmed by immunoblotting. To assess the later process of autophagy, all cells were stained with Lysotracker\\u0026trade; Red DND-99 (L7528; Thermo Fisher Scientific). Co-localization of LC3-GFP-puncta and lysosome was confirmed using the ZEISS LSM 880 confocal microscope.\\u003c/p\\u003e \\u003c/div\\u003e \\u003cdiv id=\\\"Sec9\\\" class=\\\"Section2\\\"\\u003e \\u003ch2\\u003eMeasurements of free fatty acid\\u003c/h2\\u003e \\u003cp\\u003eFor quantification of free fatty acid (FFA), parental HNC cells and PCC were seeded in 100 mm dishes. Then, cells were treated with or without ferroptosis inducers. Intracellular FFA was measured using PicoSens\\u0026trade; Free Fatty Acid Quantification Kit (BM-FFA-100; BIOMAX, Seoul, Republic of Korea) according to the manufacturer's instructions.\\u003c/p\\u003e \\u003c/div\\u003e \\u003cdiv id=\\\"Sec10\\\" class=\\\"Section2\\\"\\u003e \\u003ch2\\u003eGC/MS analysis\\u003c/h2\\u003e \\u003cp\\u003ePCC and parental cells were seeded in culture medium in 150-cm tissue culture dishes and were harvested in two days with a rubber-tipped cell scraper. The cells were washed, centrifuged twice with 1\\u0026times; phosphate-buffered saline and transferred to tubes in an equal number of 5\\u0026times;10\\u003csup\\u003e6\\u003c/sup\\u003e cells. The cells proceeded with lipid extraction after flash-freezing in LN2. For fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) analysis, cells were lyophilized and ground into fine powders. Fatty acids were extracted using 2 mL methylation mixture (MeOH:Benzene:DMP (2,2-Dimethoxy-propane):H\\u003csub\\u003e2\\u003c/sub\\u003eSO\\u003csub\\u003e4\\u003c/sub\\u003e\\u0026thinsp;=\\u0026thinsp;39:20:5:2) and 1 mL heptane, 80 ℃ for 2 h. Then, supernatants were analyzed using GC/MS (Agilent 7890 GC System; Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The analysis condition was as follows: column (DB-23, 120 mm*0.25 mm* 0.25 \\u0026micro;m; Agilent), injector (250 ℃), detector (FID-280 ℃, H\\u003csub\\u003e2\\u003c/sub\\u003e 35 ml/min, air 350 ml/min, He 10 ml/min), STD (CRM47885; Supelco 37 component FAME Mix; Supelco, Inc., Bellefonte, PA, USA), and ISTD (P6125; Pentadecanoic acid) (Sigma-Aldrich) [\\u003cspan citationid=\\\"CR17\\\" class=\\\"CitationRef\\\"\\u003e17\\u003c/span\\u003e]. After GC/MS analysis, all samples were normalized.\\u003c/p\\u003e \\u003c/div\\u003e \\u003cdiv id=\\\"Sec11\\\" class=\\\"Section2\\\"\\u003e \\u003ch2\\u003eRNA interference and gene transfection\\u003c/h2\\u003e \\u003cp\\u003eHNC cells were seeded for gene silencing or overexpression. Cells were transfected 24 h later with 10 nmol/L small-interfering RNA (siRNA) targeting human SIRT1 or scrambled control siRNA (Integrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, IA, USA) using Lipofectamine RNAiMAX reagent (13778075; Thermo Fisher Scientific). PCC was stably transduced with short hairpin RNA (shRNA) targeting PGRMC1 (pGPU6/Neo, GenePharma, Shanghai, China) using Lipofectamine 3000 reagent (L3000001; Thermo Fisher Scientific). HN3 and HN4 cells were seeded and stably transfected with a control pcDNA3.1 plasmid (V790-20; Addgene, Watertown, MA, USA) or pcDNA3.1-PGRMC1 plasmid by using Lipofectamine 3000 reagent. The levels of PGRMC1 and SIRT1 expression were confirmed via western blotting. pEGFP-LC3 (21073; Addgene) was stably transfected into HN4 parental cells, HN4-PGRMC1 plasmid, HN4PCC, and HN4PCC-shPGRMC1 using Lipofectamine 3000 reagent.\\u003c/p\\u003e \\u003c/div\\u003e \\u003cdiv id=\\\"Sec12\\\" class=\\\"Section2\\\"\\u003e \\u003ch2\\u003eReverse transcription-quantitative PCR and methylation-specific PCR\\u003c/h2\\u003e \\u003cp\\u003eHNC cells were cultured with 70% confluence in 6-cm tissue culture dishes. Total RNA from HNC cells was isolated using a total RNA extraction kit (K-3140; Bioneer, Daejeon, Republic of Korea) following the manufacturer's instructions. A reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) was performed using a SensiFAST\\u0026trade; SYBR\\u0026reg; No-ROX Kit (BIO-98050; Bioline International, Toronto, Canada) after cDNA synthesis with a SensiFAST\\u0026trade; cDNA Synthesis Kit (BIO-65054; Bioline International). PGRMC1, SIRT1, and ACTB were amplified, and the relative target mRNA levels were determined using mathematical expression 2\\u003csup\\u003e\\u0026minus;(ΔΔCt)\\u003c/sup\\u003e. All data were normalized against ACTB mRNA levels. Real-time PCR was performed with ViiA\\u0026trade; 7 Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Methylation-specific PCR (MSP) indicated methylated promoter level in bisulfite-treated genomic DNA. Genomic DNA from HNC cells was extracted by a genomic DNA extraction kit (YGB100; Real Biotech Co., Taipei, Taiwan). Extracted genomic DNA was converted into a bisulfite form using a BisulFlash DNA Modification Kit (P-1026-050; EpiGentek, Farmingdale, NY, USA). The degree of methylation was determined in SIRT1 by RT-qPCR using a Methylamp MS-qPCR Fast Kit (P-1028-100; EpiGentek).\\u003c/p\\u003e \\u003c/div\\u003e \\u003cdiv id=\\\"Sec13\\\" class=\\\"Section2\\\"\\u003e \\u003ch2\\u003eImmunoblotting and immunostaining\\u003c/h2\\u003e \\u003cp\\u003eCells were plated and grown with 70% confluence and then treated with indicated drugs or not. Cells were lysed at 4\\u0026deg;C in a cell lysis buffer (9803; Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA) with a protease/phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (5872; Cell Signaling Technology). A total of 10\\u0026ndash;40 \\u0026micro;g protein was resolved by SDS-PAGE on 10\\u0026ndash;15% gels; the resolved proteins were then transferred to nitrocellulose or polyvinylidene difluoride membranes and probed with primary and secondary antibodies. The following primary antibodies were used: PGRMC1 (K004086P; Solarbio Life Science, Beijing, China), CD36 (K004214P; Solarbio), ATGL (K004384P; Solarbio), PLIN2 (K004402P; Solarbio), ACC (3662; Cell Signaling Technology Co., Danvers, MA, USA), FASN (K001685P; Solarbio), CPT1A (K000391P; Solarbio), AMPK (2532; Cell Signaling), pAMPK (2531; Cell Signaling), 4-HNE (MA5-27570; Invitrogen), LC3B (K002189P; Solarbio), ATG5 (K106671P; Solarbio), p62 (K005444P; Solarbio), SIRT1 (sc74465; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), TTL (K009740P; Solarbio), TCP1 (K003097P; Solarbio), tyrosinated α-tubulin (ABT171; Merck Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA), detyrosinated α-tubulin (AB3201; Merck Millipore), xCT (K009230P; Solarbio), GPX4 (K006597P; Solarbio), ACSL4 (K004812P; Solarbio), and β-actin (BS6007M; BioWorld, Atlanta, GA, USA). β-actin served as the total loading control.\\u003c/p\\u003e \\u003cp\\u003eThe cells were also immunostained with an antibody against PGRMC1 (1:200; Solarbio) or detyrosinated α-tubulin (1:200; Merck Millipore). The cells were co-stained with BODIPY\\u0026trade; 493/503 for lipid droplets (D3922; Thermo Fisher Scientific), LysoTracker\\u0026trade; Deep Red (L12492; Thermo Fisher Scientific), or MitoTracker \\u003csup\\u003eTM\\u003c/sup\\u003e (M7510; Thermo Fisher Scientific). Nuclei were blue-stained with 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI).\\u003c/p\\u003e \\u003c/div\\u003e \\u003cdiv id=\\\"Sec14\\\" class=\\\"Section2\\\"\\u003e \\u003ch2\\u003eTumor xenograft\\u003c/h2\\u003e \\u003cp\\u003e All animal study procedures were performed by protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC). Six-week-old athymic BALB/c male nude mice (nu/nu) were purchased from OrientBio (Seoul, Republic of Korea). HN4 cells with transfection of PGRMC1 overexpression or control vector and HN4PCC with shPGRMC1 or control vector were subcutaneously injected into the bilateral flank of nude mice. From the day when gross nodules were detected in tumor implants, mice were subjected to different treatments: vehicle or sulfasalazine (250 mg/kg daily per intraperitoneal route) [\\u003cspan citationid=\\\"CR18\\\" class=\\\"CitationRef\\\"\\u003e18\\u003c/span\\u003e]. Erastin was not used due to its physiological instability and instead, sulfasalazine was used in our \\u003cem\\u003ein vivo\\u003c/em\\u003e experiment [\\u003cspan citationid=\\\"CR4\\\" class=\\\"CitationRef\\\"\\u003e4\\u003c/span\\u003e]. Each group included six mice. The tumor size and weight of each mouse were measured twice a week, and tumor volume was calculated as (length \\u0026times; width\\u003csup\\u003e2\\u003c/sup\\u003e)/2. After mice were sacrificed, tumors were isolated and analyzed by staining lipid droplets. The values were compared among differently treated tumors.\\u003c/p\\u003e \\u003c/div\\u003e \\u003cdiv id=\\\"Sec15\\\" class=\\\"Section2\\\"\\u003e \\u003ch2\\u003eThe Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) dataset and statistical analysis\\u003c/h2\\u003e \\u003cp\\u003eThe expression levels of PGRMC1 mRNA were obtained from the normal mucosa (\\u003cem\\u003en\\u003c/em\\u003e\\u0026thinsp;=\\u0026thinsp;44) and HNC (\\u003cem\\u003en\\u003c/em\\u003e\\u0026thinsp;=\\u0026thinsp;499) datasets of TCGA. The tumor and survival data were analyzed to find the correlation between the expression level of PGRMC1 mRNA and their survival outcomes.\\u003c/p\\u003e \\u003cp\\u003eData were presented as mean\\u0026plusmn;standard deviation (s.d.). The statistically significant differences between the treatment groups were assessed using Mann\\u0026ndash;Whitney \\u003cem\\u003eU\\u003c/em\\u003e-test or analysis of variance (ANOVA) with the Bonferroni post-hoc test. The median values of low and high expression levels of PCBP1 mRNA were determined and compared using a \\u003cem\\u003et\\u003c/em\\u003e-test. The cutoff value of PGRMC1 was determined at the lowest \\u003cem\\u003eP\\u003c/em\\u003e values for overall survival. Univariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were used to identify associations between PGRMC1 mRNA expression levels and overall survival in the HNC cohort. The Kaplan\\u0026ndash;Meier and log-rank tests were used to determine and statistically compare the survival rates, respectively. All statistical tests were two-sided, and a \\u003cem\\u003eP\\u003c/em\\u003e-value of \\u0026lt;\\u0026thinsp;0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. The statistical tests were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 22.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA).\\u003c/p\\u003e \\u003c/div\\u003e\"},{\"header\":\"Results\",\"content\":\"\\u003cdiv id=\\\"Sec17\\\" class=\\\"Section2\\\"\\u003e \\u003ch2\\u003ePCC has a metabolic shift to fatty acid oxidation\\u003c/h2\\u003e \\u003cp\\u003eDrug-tolerant persister cancer cells were developed from the treatment of paclitaxel, a first-line taxane anticancer agent for a variety of cancer types arising in the head and neck, esophagus, lung, ovary, cervix, breast, pancreas, and others [\\u003cspan citationid=\\\"CR19\\\" class=\\\"CitationRef\\\"\\u003e19\\u003c/span\\u003e]. Two HNC cell lines, HN3 and HN4, were treated with a cytotoxic dose (10 nM) of paclitaxel for 6 days, after which remained only a small population of surviving persister cancer cells. The cells were regrown without drugs for 38 days and then were re-treated with 10 nM paclitaxel for 6 days to acquire drug-tolerant persister traits (Fig.\\u0026nbsp;\\u003cspan refid=\\\"Fig1\\\" class=\\\"InternalRef\\\"\\u003e1\\u003c/span\\u003eA). Cell viability significantly increased and cell death significantly decreased in HN3 and HN4 PCC when compared with those of HN3 and HN4 parental cells (\\u003cem\\u003eP\\u003c/em\\u003e\\u0026thinsp;\\u0026lt;\\u0026thinsp;0.01) (Figs.\\u0026nbsp;\\u003cspan refid=\\\"Fig1\\\" class=\\\"InternalRef\\\"\\u003e1\\u003c/span\\u003eB and S1A).\\u003c/p\\u003e \\u003cp\\u003e \\u003c/p\\u003e \\u003cp\\u003ePCC had different properties from their parental HNC cells. Microtubules were disoriented in PCC but not in parental cells (Fig.\\u0026nbsp;\\u003cspan refid=\\\"Fig1\\\" class=\\\"InternalRef\\\"\\u003e1\\u003c/span\\u003eC). ECAR and glycolysis effect of PCC were significantly lower than those of parental cells, whereas glutamate contents of PCC were significantly higher than those of parental cells (\\u003cem\\u003eP\\u003c/em\\u003e\\u0026thinsp;\\u0026lt;\\u0026thinsp;0.01) (Figs.\\u0026nbsp;\\u003cspan refid=\\\"Fig1\\\" class=\\\"InternalRef\\\"\\u003e1\\u003c/span\\u003eD\\u0026ndash;\\u003cspan refid=\\\"Fig1\\\" class=\\\"InternalRef\\\"\\u003e1\\u003c/span\\u003eF). Free fatty acids and fatty acid oxidation (FAO) significantly increased in PCC compared to parental cells (\\u003cem\\u003eP\\u003c/em\\u003e\\u0026thinsp;\\u0026lt;\\u0026thinsp;0.01) (Figs.\\u0026nbsp;\\u003cspan refid=\\\"Fig1\\\" class=\\\"InternalRef\\\"\\u003e1\\u003c/span\\u003eG\\u0026ndash;\\u003cspan refid=\\\"Fig1\\\" class=\\\"InternalRef\\\"\\u003e1\\u003c/span\\u003eI). Lipids were more deposited and lipid droplets substantially increased in PCC than parental cells (Figs.\\u0026nbsp;\\u003cspan refid=\\\"Fig1\\\" class=\\\"InternalRef\\\"\\u003e1\\u003c/span\\u003eJ and \\u003cspan refid=\\\"Fig1\\\" class=\\\"InternalRef\\\"\\u003e1\\u003c/span\\u003eL). On immunoblotting, molecules related to fatty acids uptake and FAO, such as CD36, ATGL, PLIN2, PGRMC1, and CPT1A, increased but molecules related to fatty acid synthesis (FAS), such as ACC and FASN, decreased in PCC compared to parental cells (Fig.\\u0026nbsp;\\u003cspan refid=\\\"Fig1\\\" class=\\\"InternalRef\\\"\\u003e1\\u003c/span\\u003eK). Taken together, PCC showed more metabolic trend shifting to FAO than their parental cells.\\u003c/p\\u003e \\u003c/div\\u003e \\u003cdiv id=\\\"Sec18\\\" class=\\\"Section2\\\"\\u003e \\u003ch2\\u003ePCC is vulnerable to xCT inhibitors\\u003c/h2\\u003e \\u003cp\\u003eCell death significantly increased in PCC compared to parental cells when exposed to ferroptosis inducers inhibiting xCT: erastin, sulfasalazine, and cyst(e)ine deprivation (\\u003cem\\u003eP\\u003c/em\\u003e\\u0026thinsp;\\u0026lt;\\u0026thinsp;0.01) (Figs.\\u0026nbsp;\\u003cspan refid=\\\"Fig2\\\" class=\\\"InternalRef\\\"\\u003e2\\u003c/span\\u003eA\\u0026ndash;\\u003cspan refid=\\\"Fig2\\\" class=\\\"InternalRef\\\"\\u003e2\\u003c/span\\u003eB). The cells showed minimal sensitivity to RSL3, an inhibitor of GPX4. Cell death by ferroptosis inducers was recovered by co-treatment with ferrostatin-1, an inhibitor of ferroptosis. Cell viability by xCT inhibitors also significantly decreased in PCC (\\u003cem\\u003eP\\u003c/em\\u003e\\u0026thinsp;\\u0026lt;\\u0026thinsp;0.01) (Fig.\\u0026nbsp;\\u003cspan refid=\\\"Fig2\\\" class=\\\"InternalRef\\\"\\u003e2\\u003c/span\\u003eC). Lipid peroxidation more increased in PCC than in parental cells when exposed to the xCT inhibitors (\\u003cem\\u003eP\\u003c/em\\u003e\\u0026thinsp;\\u0026lt;\\u0026thinsp;0.01) (Figs.\\u0026nbsp;\\u003cspan refid=\\\"Fig2\\\" class=\\\"InternalRef\\\"\\u003e2\\u003c/span\\u003eD and S1B). Cellular glutathione levels in PCC were higher than parental cells and were significantly decreased by xCT inhibitors (\\u003cem\\u003eP\\u003c/em\\u003e\\u0026thinsp;\\u0026lt;\\u0026thinsp;0.01) (Fig.\\u0026nbsp;\\u003cspan refid=\\\"Fig2\\\" class=\\\"InternalRef\\\"\\u003e2\\u003c/span\\u003eE). Free fatty acid and FAO levels increased in PCC were significantly decreased by xCT inhibitors (\\u003cem\\u003eP\\u003c/em\\u003e\\u0026thinsp;\\u0026lt;\\u0026thinsp;0.01) (Figs.\\u0026nbsp;\\u003cspan refid=\\\"Fig2\\\" class=\\\"InternalRef\\\"\\u003e2\\u003c/span\\u003eF\\u0026ndash;\\u003cspan refid=\\\"Fig2\\\" class=\\\"InternalRef\\\"\\u003e2\\u003c/span\\u003eH). Lipid deposition in PCC was significantly decreased by xCT inhibitors (Fig.\\u0026nbsp;\\u003cspan refid=\\\"Fig2\\\" class=\\\"InternalRef\\\"\\u003e2\\u003c/span\\u003eI). On immunoblotting, pAMPK, CD36, CPT1A, ATGL, and 4-HNE increased in PCC but not in parental cells when exposed to the xCT inhibitors, whereas ACC, FASN, and ATGL decreased in PCC (Fig.\\u0026nbsp;\\u003cspan refid=\\\"Fig2\\\" class=\\\"InternalRef\\\"\\u003e2\\u003c/span\\u003eJ). Taken together, PCC showed more vulnerability to xCT inhibitors than parental cells.\\u003c/p\\u003e \\u003cp\\u003e \\u003c/p\\u003e \\u003c/div\\u003e \\u003cdiv id=\\\"Sec19\\\" class=\\\"Section2\\\"\\u003e \\u003ch2\\u003eRegulation of FAO or FAS in PCC modestly increases ferroptosis\\u003c/h2\\u003e \\u003cp\\u003ePCC showed prominent changes in fatty acid metabolism by shifting to FAO. Therefore, we examined whether modulation of fatty acid metabolism related to FAO or FAS affected ferroptosis sensitivity by the ferroptosis inducers. CPT1A is a rate-limiting enzyme for mitochondrial FAO that can be blocked by shCPT1A transfection into cells or etomoxir, a small-molecule inhibitor of CPT1A [\\u003cspan citationid=\\\"CR20\\\" class=\\\"CitationRef\\\"\\u003e20\\u003c/span\\u003e]. Malonyl-CoA is formed from citrate by acetyl-CoA carboxylases (ACC), and perphenazine activates protein phosphatase 2 (PP2A) converting ACC to an active form [\\u003cspan citationid=\\\"CR21\\\" class=\\\"CitationRef\\\"\\u003e21\\u003c/span\\u003e]. All the malonyl-CoA, citrate, and perphenazine can increase FAS in cells. The inhibition of CPT1A or activation of ACC modestly increased ferroptotic cell death in PCC with the treatment of RSL3 or erastin (Figs. S2A\\u0026ndash;S2C). Lipid peroxidation and mitochondrial ROS generation modestly increased in PCC treated with RSL3 or erastin (Figs. S2D\\u0026ndash;S2F). CPT1A silencing inhibited FAO but enhanced FAS by the increased expression of ACC, FASN, and CD36, and malonyl-CoA, citrate, or perphenazine treatment also increased FAS by the increased expression of CD36 or ACC and FASN (Fig. S3A\\u0026ndash;S3B). Expression of PGRMC1, ATGL, and LN3B was not significantly changed. Free fatty acid, lipid droplets, and lipid deposition were modestly increased by inhibition of FAO and activation of FAS, which were modestly decreased by erastin treatment (Figs. S3D\\u0026ndash;S3F). Inhibition of FAO and activation of FAS increased the expression of ACSL4, 4-HNE, pAMPK, LC3B, p16, and α-tubulin to minimal levels (Figs. S4A\\u0026ndash;S4B). Lipid droplets were minimally changed by CTP1A inhibition or citrate treatment combined with treatment of erastin (Figs. S4C\\u0026ndash;S4D). Taken together, inhibition of FAO and activation of FAS had a modest effect on ferroptosis sensitivity and minimal effect on lipophagy.\\u003c/p\\u003e \\u003c/div\\u003e \\u003cdiv id=\\\"Sec20\\\" class=\\\"Section2\\\"\\u003e \\u003ch2\\u003ePGRMC1 is a critical regulator of enhanced ferroptosis in PCC\\u003c/h2\\u003e \\u003cp\\u003eWe identified that PGRMC1 expression robustly increased in PCC. PGRMC1 is known to alter lipid metabolism and promote the proliferation and progression of cancer cells [\\u003cspan citationid=\\\"CR22\\\" class=\\\"CitationRef\\\"\\u003e22\\u003c/span\\u003e]. Next, we inhibited PGRMC1 expression in PCC by transfection of shPGRMC1 vector and induced PGRMC1 expression in parental HNC cells by transfection of PGRMC1 overexpression vector (Figs.\\u0026nbsp;\\u003cspan refid=\\\"Fig3\\\" class=\\\"InternalRef\\\"\\u003e3\\u003c/span\\u003eA\\u0026ndash;\\u003cspan refid=\\\"Fig3\\\" class=\\\"InternalRef\\\"\\u003e3\\u003c/span\\u003eB). PGRMC1 silencing in PCC significantly decreased ferroptosis sensitivity by xCT inhibitors in terms of examining cell viability, death, and labile iron pool (Figs.\\u0026nbsp;\\u003cspan refid=\\\"Fig3\\\" class=\\\"InternalRef\\\"\\u003e3\\u003c/span\\u003eC\\u0026ndash;\\u003cspan refid=\\\"Fig3\\\" class=\\\"InternalRef\\\"\\u003e3\\u003c/span\\u003eE). Conversely, PCRMC1 overexpression in parental HNC cells significantly decreased cell viability and increased cell death, lipid peroxidation, and intracellular labile iron pool, when the cells underwent xCT inhibitors (Figs.\\u0026nbsp;\\u003cspan refid=\\\"Fig3\\\" class=\\\"InternalRef\\\"\\u003e3\\u003c/span\\u003eF\\u0026ndash;\\u003cspan refid=\\\"Fig3\\\" class=\\\"InternalRef\\\"\\u003e3\\u003c/span\\u003eH). On immunoblotting, CD36, CPT1A, ATGL, PLIN2, LC3B, and PGRMC1 expression increased in parental cells with PGRMC1 overexpression as the same as shown in PCC, which were reversed in PCC with shPGRMC1 transfection (Fig.\\u0026nbsp;\\u003cspan refid=\\\"Fig3\\\" class=\\\"InternalRef\\\"\\u003e3\\u003c/span\\u003eI). Taken together, our data showed that PGRMC1 expression was closely related to ferroptosis sensitivity to xCT inhibitors.\\u003c/p\\u003e \\u003cp\\u003e \\u003c/p\\u003e \\u003c/div\\u003e \\u003cdiv id=\\\"Sec21\\\" class=\\\"Section2\\\"\\u003e \\u003ch2\\u003ePGRMC1 promotes ferroptosis via lipophagy and tubulin detyrosination\\u003c/h2\\u003e \\u003cp\\u003ePGRMC1 can promote autophagy by elevating cleaved LC3B levels [\\u003cspan citationid=\\\"CR14\\\" class=\\\"CitationRef\\\"\\u003e14\\u003c/span\\u003e]. Therefore, we examined whether PGRMC1 engaged in cytosolic lipophagy formation in cancer cells with PGRMC1 expression when exposed to ferroptosis inducers. Erastin treatment induced lipid droplet degradation by autophagy in PCC or parental cells with transfection of PGRMC1 overexpression vector or P4 treatment (Figs.\\u0026nbsp;\\u003cspan refid=\\\"Fig4\\\" class=\\\"InternalRef\\\"\\u003e4\\u003c/span\\u003eA\\u0026ndash;\\u003cspan refid=\\\"Fig4\\\" class=\\\"InternalRef\\\"\\u003e4\\u003c/span\\u003eD). The degradation of lipid droplets by erastin treatment was inhibited by the treatment of Wortmannin, an autophagy inhibitor. Conversely, erastin treatment minimally affected lipid droplet degradation and autophagosome formation in parental cells with vector transfection or PCC with the inhibition of PGRMC1 expression by transfection of shPGRMC1 vector or AG205 treatment. Cleaved LC3B increased and p62 decreased along with the autophagy process in the cancer cells with PGRMC1 expression (Fig.\\u0026nbsp;\\u003cspan refid=\\\"Fig4\\\" class=\\\"InternalRef\\\"\\u003e4\\u003c/span\\u003eC). Pharmacological regulation of PGRMC1 expression by P4 or AG205 in parental cells and PCC significantly affected ferroptosis sensitivity by xCT inhibitors in terms of cell viability, lipid peroxidation, and intracellular labile iron pool (\\u003cem\\u003eP\\u003c/em\\u003e\\u0026thinsp;\\u0026lt;\\u0026thinsp;0.01) (Fig. S5A\\u0026ndash;SF). PGRMC1 expression was also associated with increased autophagosome formation (Figs.\\u0026nbsp;\\u003cspan refid=\\\"Fig4\\\" class=\\\"InternalRef\\\"\\u003e4\\u003c/span\\u003eD). Free fatty acid contents significantly increased in parental cells with PGRMC1 overexpression or P4 treatment in addition to PCC, whereas those significantly decreased in PCC with PGRMC1 inhibition (\\u003cem\\u003eP\\u003c/em\\u003e\\u0026thinsp;\\u0026lt;\\u0026thinsp;0.001) (Fig.\\u0026nbsp;\\u003cspan refid=\\\"Fig4\\\" class=\\\"InternalRef\\\"\\u003e4\\u003c/span\\u003eF). In particular, PUFA contents increased in parental cells with PGRMC1 overexpression or PCC, which were reversed by PGRMC1 inhibition (Fig.\\u0026nbsp;\\u003cspan refid=\\\"Fig4\\\" class=\\\"InternalRef\\\"\\u003e4\\u003c/span\\u003eE). Conversely, monounsaturated fatty acid (MUFA) contents decreased in cancer cells with PGRMC1 expression or P4 treatment but increased in PCC with shPGRMC1 vector transfection or AG205 treatment.\\u003c/p\\u003e \\u003cp\\u003e \\u003c/p\\u003e \\u003cp\\u003eNext, we examined whether the detyrosination of α-tubulin by PGRMC1 contributed to lipophagy and ferroptosis sensitivity by xCT inhibitors because PGRMC1 is known to induce microtubule stability [\\u003cspan citationid=\\\"CR23\\\" class=\\\"CitationRef\\\"\\u003e23\\u003c/span\\u003e]. Detyrosinated α-tubulin levels increased with lipid droplets in PCC or parental cells with PGRMC1 overexpression or P4 treatment and decreased in parental cells with vector transfection or PCC with PGRMC1 inhibition (Fig.\\u0026nbsp;\\u003cspan refid=\\\"Fig5\\\" class=\\\"InternalRef\\\"\\u003e5\\u003c/span\\u003eA\\u0026ndash;\\u003cspan refid=\\\"Fig5\\\" class=\\\"InternalRef\\\"\\u003e5\\u003c/span\\u003eB). Erastin treatment significantly increased the levels of detyrosinated α-tubulin and degraded lipid droplets in PGRMC1 expressing or activating cells, which were inhibited by parthenolide (PTN), a sesquiterpene lactone inhibiting the activity of tubulin carboxypeptidases (TCP) [\\u003cspan citationid=\\\"CR24\\\" class=\\\"CitationRef\\\"\\u003e24\\u003c/span\\u003e] (Figs.\\u0026nbsp;\\u003cspan refid=\\\"Fig5\\\" class=\\\"InternalRef\\\"\\u003e5\\u003c/span\\u003eA\\u0026ndash;\\u003cspan refid=\\\"Fig5\\\" class=\\\"InternalRef\\\"\\u003e5\\u003c/span\\u003eB, and \\u003cspan refid=\\\"Fig5\\\" class=\\\"InternalRef\\\"\\u003e5\\u003c/span\\u003eE). The levels of SIRT1 mRNA and protein and pAMPK were elevated along with PGRMC1 expression (Fig.\\u0026nbsp;\\u003cspan refid=\\\"Fig5\\\" class=\\\"InternalRef\\\"\\u003e5\\u003c/span\\u003eC and \\u003cspan refid=\\\"Fig5\\\" class=\\\"InternalRef\\\"\\u003e5\\u003c/span\\u003eE). SIRT1 expression was increased by PGRMC1 overexpression in parental cells, which were silenced by siSIRT1 transfection (Fig.\\u0026nbsp;\\u003cspan refid=\\\"Fig5\\\" class=\\\"InternalRef\\\"\\u003e5\\u003c/span\\u003eF). The levels of pAMPK and detyrosinated α-tubulin were significantly increased by erastin treatment, which was reversed by siSIRT1 transfection. SIRT1 inhibition in parental cancer cells with PGRMC1 overexpression blocked autophagy, but SIRT1 activation in PCC with PGRMC1 inhibition induced autophagy, which was not affected by parthenolide treatment (Fig.\\u0026nbsp;\\u003cspan refid=\\\"Fig5\\\" class=\\\"InternalRef\\\"\\u003e5\\u003c/span\\u003eG). Taken together, our data showed that PGRMC1 promotes lipophagy and autophagy by increased tubulin detyrosination, which contributed to increased ferroptosis sensitivity in PCC.\\u003c/p\\u003e \\u003cp\\u003e \\u003c/p\\u003e \\u003c/div\\u003e \\u003cdiv id=\\\"Sec22\\\" class=\\\"Section2\\\"\\u003e \\u003ch2\\u003ePGRMC1 expression increases FAO and ferroptosis sensitivity in vivo\\u003c/h2\\u003e \\u003cp\\u003eFAO can be promoted by contact between lipid droplets and mitochondria [\\u003cspan citationid=\\\"CR25\\\" class=\\\"CitationRef\\\"\\u003e25\\u003c/span\\u003e]. Therefore, we examined whether PGRMC1 involved the connection between lipid droplets and mitochondria for increasing FAO in cancer cells. Immunofluorescent staining showed that the co-staining of lipid droplets and mitochondria in parental cells with PGRMC1 overexpression or PCC, and lipid droplets were degraded by erastin treatment (Fig.\\u0026nbsp;\\u003cspan refid=\\\"Fig6\\\" class=\\\"InternalRef\\\"\\u003e6\\u003c/span\\u003eA). Mitochondrial ROS and FAO significantly increased in these cells with PGRMC1 expression and further were greatly boosted by erastin treatment, which was inhibited by PGRMC1 inhibition (Figs.\\u0026nbsp;\\u003cspan refid=\\\"Fig6\\\" class=\\\"InternalRef\\\"\\u003e6\\u003c/span\\u003eB\\u0026ndash;\\u003cspan refid=\\\"Fig6\\\" class=\\\"InternalRef\\\"\\u003e6\\u003c/span\\u003eF). This was accompanied by the changes of CPT1A, ATGL, and PLIN2 expression with or without PGRMC1 expression and erastin treatment (Fig.\\u0026nbsp;\\u003cspan refid=\\\"Fig6\\\" class=\\\"InternalRef\\\"\\u003e6\\u003c/span\\u003eG).\\u003c/p\\u003e \\u003cp\\u003e \\u003c/p\\u003e \\u003cp\\u003eAnimal experiments showed that the \\u003cem\\u003ein vivo\\u003c/em\\u003e tumor growth was promoted by PGRMC1 expression and was more significantly inhibited in the PGRMC1-expressing tumors by the treatment of sulfasalazine, an xCT inhibitor (Fig.\\u0026nbsp;\\u003cspan refid=\\\"Fig7\\\" class=\\\"InternalRef\\\"\\u003e7\\u003c/span\\u003eA\\u0026ndash;\\u003cspan refid=\\\"Fig7\\\" class=\\\"InternalRef\\\"\\u003e7\\u003c/span\\u003eE). Lipid droplets were more abundant in PGRMC1 overexpression or PCC tumors than low PGRMC1 expression tumors (Figs.\\u0026nbsp;\\u003cspan refid=\\\"Fig7\\\" class=\\\"InternalRef\\\"\\u003e7\\u003c/span\\u003eF\\u0026ndash;\\u003cspan refid=\\\"Fig7\\\" class=\\\"InternalRef\\\"\\u003e7\\u003c/span\\u003eG). Lipid droplets in tumors were reduced by sulfasalazine treatment. From the HNC patient cohort of TCGA datasets, PGRMC1 mRNA expression was significantly higher in HNC samples than normal mucosa (\\u003cem\\u003eP\\u003c/em\\u003e\\u0026thinsp;\\u0026lt;\\u0026thinsp;0.001) (Fig.\\u0026nbsp;\\u003cspan refid=\\\"Fig7\\\" class=\\\"InternalRef\\\"\\u003e7\\u003c/span\\u003eH). Overall survival was significantly lower in patients with high PGRMC1 expression than those with low PGRMC1 expression (\\u003cem\\u003eP\\u003c/em\\u003e\\u0026thinsp;\\u0026lt;\\u0026thinsp;0.001) (Fig.\\u0026nbsp;\\u003cspan refid=\\\"Fig7\\\" class=\\\"InternalRef\\\"\\u003e7\\u003c/span\\u003eI).\\u003c/p\\u003e \\u003cp\\u003e \\u003c/p\\u003e \\u003c/div\\u003e\"},{\"header\":\"Discussion\",\"content\":\"\\u003cp\\u003eThe present study showed that PCC had PGRMC1 upregulation related to increased free fatty acids, lipid droplets, and FAO. PCC was highly sensitive to ferroptosis inducers inhibiting the xCT, such as erastin, sulfasalazine, and cyst(e)ine deprivation, but less sensitive to GPX4 inhibition by RSL3. Regulation of FAO or FAS in PCC modestly increases ferroptosis. Ferroptosis sensitivity to xCT inhibitors was reduced by PGRMC1 silencing in PCC and increased by PGRMC1 overexpression in parental cells. From xCT inhibitors in PCC, lipid droplets were substantially degraded by autophagic processes characterizing as lipophagy and by interaction with the mitochondria. This was facilitated by the increased tubulin detyrosination that was increased by SIRT1 activation but decreased by SIRT1 inhibition (Fig.\\u0026nbsp;\\u003cspan refid=\\\"Fig8\\\" class=\\\"InternalRef\\\"\\u003e8\\u003c/span\\u003e). PGRMC1 expression elevated FAO and ferroptosis sensitivity from \\u003cem\\u003ein vivo\\u003c/em\\u003e mice experiments with tumor transplantation. Therefore, our data suggest that PGRMC1 expression was characterized as the chemo-resistant property of PCC that was vulnerable to ferroptosis by xCT inhibitors.\\u003c/p\\u003e \\u003cp\\u003e \\u003c/p\\u003e \\u003cp\\u003ePCC showed a metabolic shift to FAO along with PGRMC1 upregulation. Alteration of cellular metabolism and lipid homeostasis mediates the chemoresistance of tumor cells to anti-cancer drugs [\\u003cspan citationid=\\\"CR22\\\" class=\\\"CitationRef\\\"\\u003e22\\u003c/span\\u003e]. Enhanced glutaminolysis increases the cellular levels of glutamine, glutamate, and GSH in breast cancer cells treated with paclitaxel [\\u003cspan citationid=\\\"CR26\\\" class=\\\"CitationRef\\\"\\u003e26\\u003c/span\\u003e]. Adipocyte and lipid metabolic reprogramming is a hallmark of resistant cancer cells: stores excessive energy as lipid droplets that can be broken down free fatty acids and transport into the mitochondria through accelerated FAO [\\u003cspan citationid=\\\"CR27\\\" class=\\\"CitationRef\\\"\\u003e27\\u003c/span\\u003e]. Paclitaxel induces cytotoxicity in tumor cells by binding to tubulin, stabilizing the microtubule, and preventing its disassembly, and selectively arresting the cell cycle in the G2/M phase [\\u003cspan citationid=\\\"CR28\\\" class=\\\"CitationRef\\\"\\u003e28\\u003c/span\\u003e]. Predictably, the disruption of microtubule dynamics alters the binding of paclitaxel to the microtubule, resulting in paclitaxel insensitivity in cancer cells [\\u003cspan citationid=\\\"CR29\\\" class=\\\"CitationRef\\\"\\u003e29\\u003c/span\\u003e]. PGRMC1 also directly interacts with tubulin, stabilizes the spindle microtubule, and affects mitosis through a microtubule-dependent process [\\u003cspan citationid=\\\"CR23\\\" class=\\\"CitationRef\\\"\\u003e23\\u003c/span\\u003e]. PGRMC1 expression promotes tumor growth and decreased the chemosensitivity of human xenograft tumors to paclitaxel [\\u003cspan citationid=\\\"CR30\\\" class=\\\"CitationRef\\\"\\u003e30\\u003c/span\\u003e]. The findings may hint the potential link between paclitaxel insensitivity and PGRMC1. Our data also supported that paclitaxel insensitivity in PCC was associated with the altered lipid metabolism and disoriented microtubule by its decreased stabilization, which was accompanied by the increased expression of PGRMC1.\\u003c/p\\u003e \\u003cp\\u003ePCC was quite sensitive to ferroptosis inducers. Ferroptosis is a new form of necrosis based on the iron-dependent accumulation of excessive lipid peroxidation [\\u003cspan citationid=\\\"CR10\\\" class=\\\"CitationRef\\\"\\u003e10\\u003c/span\\u003e]. Accumulation of free fatty acids, PUFAs, is an essential prerequisite to produce lipid peroxidation by the phospholipid-binding of ROS from iron-mediated reactions of peroxides [\\u003cspan citationid=\\\"CR8\\\" class=\\\"CitationRef\\\"\\u003e8\\u003c/span\\u003e]. Altered lipid reprogramming characterized by increased free fatty acids, lipid droplets, and FAO in PCC may contribute to more vulnerability to ferroptosis compared with parental cells. Therapy-resistant persister cancer cells show a high-mesenchymal cell state and dependency on a lipid peroxidase pathway that causes the vulnerability to ferroptotic cell death [\\u003cspan citationid=\\\"CR5\\\" class=\\\"CitationRef\\\"\\u003e5\\u003c/span\\u003e]. This cell state involves the alteration of lipid metabolism characterized by the increased activity of enzymes that promote PUFA synthesis and by the high expression of ZEB1 that induces EMT in epithelial cancers [\\u003cspan citationid=\\\"CR4\\\" class=\\\"CitationRef\\\"\\u003e4\\u003c/span\\u003e]. Inhibition of a lipid peroxidase pathway GPX4 induces ferroptosis in therapy-resistant cancer cells and prevents tumor relapse \\u003cem\\u003ein vivo\\u003c/em\\u003e [\\u003cspan citationid=\\\"CR5\\\" class=\\\"CitationRef\\\"\\u003e5\\u003c/span\\u003e]. In the present study, PCC was also vulnerable to ferroptotic cell death, particularly induced by the xCT inhibitors. The enhanced ferroptosis sensitivity might be in part explained by the increased free fatty acids and PUFA contents, lipid droplets, and FAO in PCC. However, ferroptosis was only modestly promoted by the regulation of FAO or FAS in PCC. Besides, there were some differences in ferroptosis sensitivity between xCT and GPX4 inhibitors. This needed to elucidate further mechanisms that explained the increased ferroptosis sensitivity in PCC.\\u003c/p\\u003e \\u003cp\\u003eThe present study showed that PGRMC1 involved lipophagy by increased tubulin detyrosination and interaction with the mitochondria. PGRMC1 involved the substantial degradation of lipid droplets along with the autophagic process of autophagosome formation and lipophagy. PGRMC1 promotes autophagy via direct binding to a key component of the autophagy machinery LC3 causing increased cleaved LC3 levels and the degradative activity of autophagy [\\u003cspan citationid=\\\"CR14\\\" class=\\\"CitationRef\\\"\\u003e14\\u003c/span\\u003e]. Lipophagy is an autophagic process targeting lipid droplets to break down in lysosomes that are degraded by promoting interaction between autophagosomal lipid droplets and lysosomes [\\u003cspan citationid=\\\"CR31\\\" class=\\\"CitationRef\\\"\\u003e31\\u003c/span\\u003e]. Lipid droplet dispersion can be involved in the lipophagic process that occurs on the detyrosinated microtubule to increased mitochondrial FAO via AMPK activation [\\u003cspan citationid=\\\"CR32\\\" class=\\\"CitationRef\\\"\\u003e32\\u003c/span\\u003e]. Lipid droplet lipolysis and autophagy move cytosolic fatty acids from lipid droplets to mitochondria via the fusion of lipid droplets and mitochondria [\\u003cspan citationid=\\\"CR33\\\" class=\\\"CitationRef\\\"\\u003e33\\u003c/span\\u003e]. Mitochondria fusion with lipid droplets induces lipid storage and utilization, resulting in simultaneous involvement in FAO and lipid droplets formation in cells [\\u003cspan citationid=\\\"CR34\\\" class=\\\"CitationRef\\\"\\u003e34\\u003c/span\\u003e]. Detyrosinated microtubules spatially interact with lysosomes, which increases autolysosomes, a fusion intermediate of autophagosomes and lysosomes, and play a role in carrying lipid droplets to break down in lysosomes and their utilization for mitochondrial FAO [\\u003cspan citationid=\\\"CR35\\\" class=\\\"CitationRef\\\"\\u003e35\\u003c/span\\u003e]. Besides, PGRMC1 expression alters genomic CpG methylation, such as NAD-dependent deacetylases, e.g. sirtuins [\\u003cspan citationid=\\\"CR36\\\" class=\\\"CitationRef\\\"\\u003e36\\u003c/span\\u003e]. SIRT1 activation might promote autophagy/lipophagy of lipid droplets via AMPK activation via cytosolic lipases such as ATGL [\\u003cspan citationid=\\\"CR37\\\" class=\\\"CitationRef\\\"\\u003e37\\u003c/span\\u003e]. Therefore, our data may support that PGRMC1-dependent lipophagy can be mediated by a SIRT1-AMPK axis.\\u003c/p\\u003e \\u003cp\\u003eThe present study has shown that PGRMC1 expression was a critical regulator of promoting ferroptosis in PCC. However, this study has several limitations. First, PGRMC1 plays diverse roles in the regulation of cytochrome P450, steroidogenesis, progesterone signaling, membrane trafficking, mitotic spindle and cell cycle regulation, and autophagy [\\u003cspan citationid=\\\"CR12\\\" class=\\\"CitationRef\\\"\\u003e12\\u003c/span\\u003e]. Activation of PGRMC1 may affect the functions of normal cells as well as cancer cells, which might induce ferroptotic cell death in both. Second, PCC showed high sensitivity to xCT inhibitors but relatively less sensitivity to GPX4 inhibitors. The current study has not fully elucidated key molecules or pathways that explain different sensitivities between xCT and GPX4 inhibitors. This might be a phenomenon localized in PCC and is dependent on GPX4 expression inhibited by cyst(e)ine metabolism [\\u003cspan citationid=\\\"CR38\\\" class=\\\"CitationRef\\\"\\u003e38\\u003c/span\\u003e]. This needs to be elucidated by further studies. Nonetheless, PGRMC1 expression in PCC promoted the sensitivity to ferroptosis inducers, which might be a promising strategy to eradicate persister cells surviving after conventional or targeted chemotherapy.\\u003c/p\\u003e\"},{\"header\":\"Conclusion\",\"content\":\"\\u003cp\\u003eThe present study suggests that PGRMC1 is required in order for xCT inhibitors to induce ferroptosis in PCC. PGRMC1 is a key regulator of being more vulnerable to ferroptosis in PCC than parental cells via lipophagy-dependent degradation of lipid droplets and mitochondrial FAO. Activation of PGRMC1 might be a potential strategy to kill recalcitrant cancer cells via promoting their ferroptosis susceptibility.\\u003c/p\\u003e \"},{\"header\":\"Abbreviations\",\"content\":\"\\u003cp\\u003eCCK-8, cell counting kit-8; DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide; EMT, epithelial-mesenchymal transition; FFA, free fatty acid; FAO, fatty acid oxidation; FAS, fatty acid synthesis; GSH, glutathione; GPX4, Glutathione peroxidase 4; HNC, head and neck cancer; 4-HNE, 4-hydroxynonenal; LC3, microtubule-associated proteins 1 light chain 3; LIP, labile iron pool; 15-LOX, ALOX15, 15-lipoxygenase; MUFA, monounsaturated fatty acid; pAMPK, phospho-5' adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase; P4, progesterone; PCC, paclitaxel-tolerant persister cancer cells; PGRMC1, progesterone receptor membrane component 1; PUFA, polyunsaturated fatty acid; ROS, reactive oxygen species; sirtuin 1, SIRT1; xCT, system xc\\u003csup\\u003e\\u0026minus;\\u003c/sup\\u003e cystine/glutamate antiporter.\\u003c/p\\u003e\"},{\"header\":\"Declarations\",\"content\":\"\\u003cp\\u003e\\u003cstrong\\u003eEthics approval and consent to participate\\u003c/strong\\u003e\\u003c/p\\u003e\\n\\u003cp\\u003eAll animal studies were conducted under the guidelines of the Korean National Institutes of Health and were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of\\u0026nbsp;CHA\\u0026nbsp;University School of Medicine.\\u003c/p\\u003e\\n\\u003cp\\u003e\\u003cstrong\\u003eConsent for publication\\u003c/strong\\u003e\\u003c/p\\u003e\\n\\u003cp\\u003eNot applicable.\\u003cstrong\\u003e\\u0026nbsp;\\u003c/strong\\u003e\\u003c/p\\u003e\\n\\u003cp\\u003e\\u003cstrong\\u003eAvailability of data and materials\\u003c/strong\\u003e\\u003c/p\\u003e\\n\\u003cp\\u003eThe TCGA dataset regarding to PGRMC1 mRNA were available the cBioPortal for Cancer Genomics.\\u0026nbsp;The data in the current study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.\\u003c/p\\u003e\\n\\u003cp\\u003e\\u003cstrong\\u003eCompeting interests\\u003c/strong\\u003e\\u003c/p\\u003e\\n\\u003cp\\u003eAll authors declare no conflict of interests.\\u003c/p\\u003e\\n\\u003cp\\u003e\\u003cstrong\\u003eFunding\\u003c/strong\\u003e\\u003c/p\\u003e\\n\\u003cp\\u003eThis study was supported\\u0026nbsp;by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant, funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT), The Government of Korea (No.\\u0026nbsp;2019R1A2C2002259).\\u003c/p\\u003e\\n\\u003cp\\u003e\\u003cstrong\\u003eAuthor contributions\\u003c/strong\\u003e\\u003c/p\\u003e\\n\\u003cp\\u003eJ.H.Y., J.L., and J.-L.R. conceived and designed the experiments. J.H.Y., J.L., and J.-L.R. performed the experiments. J.H.Y., J.L., and J.-L.R. analyzed the data. J.H.Y. and J.L. contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools. J.H.Y., J.L., and J.-L.R. wrote the draft, and checked and revised. All authors approved to submit this version to this publication.\\u003c/p\\u003e\\n\\u003cp\\u003e\\u003cstrong\\u003eAcknowledgements\\u003c/strong\\u003e\\u003c/p\\u003e\\n\\u003cp\\u003eNot applicable\\u003c/p\\u003e\\n\\u003cp\\u003e\\u003cstrong\\u003eAuthors\\u0026rsquo; information\\u003c/strong\\u003e\\u003c/p\\u003e\\n\\u003cp\\u003eDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seongnam, Republic of Korea\\u003c/p\\u003e\"},{\"header\":\"References\",\"content\":\"\\u003col\\u003e\\u003cli\\u003e\\u003cspan\\u003eMullard A. Stemming the tide of drug resistance in cancer. Nature reviews Drug discovery. 2020;19:221\\u0026ndash;3. doi:\\u003cspan class=\\\"ExternalRef\\\"\\u003e\\u003cspan class=\\\"RefSource\\\"\\u003e10.1038/d41573-020-00050-y\\u003c/span\\u003e\\u003c/span\\u003e.\\u003c/span\\u003e\\u003c/li\\u003e \\u003cli\\u003e\\u003cspan\\u003eSharma SV, Lee DY, Li B, Quinlan MP, Takahashi F, Maheswaran S, et al. A chromatin-mediated reversible drug-tolerant state in cancer cell subpopulations. Cell. 2010;141:69\\u0026ndash;80. doi:\\u003cspan class=\\\"ExternalRef\\\"\\u003e\\u003cspan class=\\\"RefSource\\\"\\u003e10.1016/j.cell.2010.02.027\\u003c/span\\u003e\\u003c/span\\u003e.\\u003c/span\\u003e\\u003c/li\\u003e \\u003cli\\u003e\\u003cspan\\u003eBoumahdi S, de Sauvage FJ. The great escape: tumour cell plasticity in resistance to targeted therapy. Nature reviews Drug discovery. 2020;19:39\\u0026ndash;56. doi:\\u003cspan class=\\\"ExternalRef\\\"\\u003e\\u003cspan class=\\\"RefSource\\\"\\u003e10.1038/s41573-019-0044-1\\u003c/span\\u003e\\u003c/span\\u003e.\\u003c/span\\u003e\\u003c/li\\u003e \\u003cli\\u003e\\u003cspan\\u003eViswanathan VS, Ryan MJ, Dhruv HD, Gill S, Eichhoff OM, Seashore-Ludlow B, et al. Dependency of a therapy-resistant state of cancer cells on a lipid peroxidase pathway. Nature. 2017;547:453\\u0026ndash;7. doi:\\u003cspan class=\\\"ExternalRef\\\"\\u003e\\u003cspan class=\\\"RefSource\\\"\\u003e10.1038/nature23007\\u003c/span\\u003e\\u003c/span\\u003e.\\u003c/span\\u003e\\u003c/li\\u003e \\u003cli\\u003e\\u003cspan\\u003eHangauer MJ, Viswanathan VS, Ryan MJ, Bole D, Eaton JK, Matov A, et al. Drug-tolerant persister cancer cells are vulnerable to GPX4 inhibition. Nature. 2017;551:247\\u0026ndash;50. doi:\\u003cspan class=\\\"ExternalRef\\\"\\u003e\\u003cspan class=\\\"RefSource\\\"\\u003e10.1038/nature24297\\u003c/span\\u003e\\u003c/span\\u003e.\\u003c/span\\u003e\\u003c/li\\u003e \\u003cli\\u003e\\u003cspan\\u003eYou JH, Lee J, Roh JL. Mitochondrial pyruvate carrier 1 regulates ferroptosis in drug-tolerant persister head and neck cancer cells via epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Cancer letters. 2021;507:40\\u0026ndash;54. doi:\\u003cspan class=\\\"ExternalRef\\\"\\u003e\\u003cspan class=\\\"RefSource\\\"\\u003e10.1016/j.canlet.2021.03.013\\u003c/span\\u003e\\u003c/span\\u003e.\\u003c/span\\u003e\\u003c/li\\u003e \\u003cli\\u003e\\u003cspan\\u003eAngeli JPF, Shah R, Pratt DA, Conrad M. Ferroptosis Inhibition: Mechanisms and Opportunities. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2017;38:489\\u0026ndash;98. doi:\\u003cspan class=\\\"ExternalRef\\\"\\u003e\\u003cspan class=\\\"RefSource\\\"\\u003e10.1016/j.tips.2017.02.005\\u003c/span\\u003e\\u003c/span\\u003e.\\u003c/span\\u003e\\u003c/li\\u003e \\u003cli\\u003e\\u003cspan\\u003eDixon SJ, Lemberg KM, Lamprecht MR, Skouta R, Zaitsev EM, Gleason CE, et al. Ferroptosis: an iron-dependent form of nonapoptotic cell death. Cell. 2012;149:1060\\u0026ndash;72. doi:\\u003cspan class=\\\"ExternalRef\\\"\\u003e\\u003cspan class=\\\"RefSource\\\"\\u003e10.1016/j.cell.2012.03.042\\u003c/span\\u003e\\u003c/span\\u003e.\\u003c/span\\u003e\\u003c/li\\u003e \\u003cli\\u003e\\u003cspan\\u003eFeng H, Stockwell BR. Unsolved mysteries: How does lipid peroxidation cause ferroptosis? PLoS Biol. 2018;16:e2006203. doi:\\u003cspan class=\\\"ExternalRef\\\"\\u003e\\u003cspan class=\\\"RefSource\\\"\\u003e10.1371/journal.pbio.2006203\\u003c/span\\u003e\\u003c/span\\u003e.\\u003c/span\\u003e\\u003c/li\\u003e \\u003cli\\u003e\\u003cspan\\u003eStockwell BR, Friedmann Angeli JP, Bayir H, Bush AI, Conrad M, Dixon SJ, et al. Ferroptosis: A Regulated Cell Death Nexus Linking Metabolism, Redox Biology, and Disease. Cell. 2017;171:273\\u0026ndash;85. doi:\\u003cspan class=\\\"ExternalRef\\\"\\u003e\\u003cspan class=\\\"RefSource\\\"\\u003e10.1016/j.cell.2017.09.021\\u003c/span\\u003e\\u003c/span\\u003e.\\u003c/span\\u003e\\u003c/li\\u003e \\u003cli\\u003e\\u003cspan\\u003eHughes AL, Powell DW, Bard M, Eckstein J, Barbuch R, Link AJ, et al. Dap1/PGRMC1 binds and regulates cytochrome P450 enzymes. Cell Metabol. 2007;5:143\\u0026ndash;9. doi:\\u003cspan class=\\\"ExternalRef\\\"\\u003e\\u003cspan class=\\\"RefSource\\\"\\u003e10.1016/j.cmet.2006.12.009\\u003c/span\\u003e\\u003c/span\\u003e.\\u003c/span\\u003e\\u003c/li\\u003e \\u003cli\\u003e\\u003cspan\\u003eCahill MA, Jazayeri JA, Catalano SM, Toyokuni S, Kovacevic Z, Richardson DR. The emerging role of progesterone receptor membrane component 1 (PGRMC1) in cancer biology. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2016;1866:339\\u0026ndash;49. doi:\\u003cspan class=\\\"ExternalRef\\\"\\u003e\\u003cspan class=\\\"RefSource\\\"\\u003e10.1016/j.bbcan.2016.07.004\\u003c/span\\u003e\\u003c/span\\u003e.\\u003c/span\\u003e\\u003c/li\\u003e \\u003cli\\u003e\\u003cspan\\u003eCrudden G, Loesel R, Craven RJ. Overexpression of the cytochrome p450 activator hpr6 (heme-1 domain protein/human progesterone receptor) in tumors. Tumour biology: the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology Medicine. 2005;26:142\\u0026ndash;6. doi:\\u003cspan class=\\\"ExternalRef\\\"\\u003e\\u003cspan class=\\\"RefSource\\\"\\u003e10.1159/000086485\\u003c/span\\u003e\\u003c/span\\u003e.\\u003c/span\\u003e\\u003c/li\\u003e \\u003cli\\u003e\\u003cspan\\u003eMir SU, Schwarze SR, Jin L, Zhang J, Friend W, Miriyala S, et al. Progesterone receptor membrane component 1/Sigma-2 receptor associates with MAP1LC3B and promotes autophagy. Autophagy. 2013;9:1566\\u0026ndash;78. doi:\\u003cspan class=\\\"ExternalRef\\\"\\u003e\\u003cspan class=\\\"RefSource\\\"\\u003e10.4161/auto.25889\\u003c/span\\u003e\\u003c/span\\u003e.\\u003c/span\\u003e\\u003c/li\\u003e \\u003cli\\u003e\\u003cspan\\u003eRohe HJ, Ahmed IS, Twist KE, Craven RJ. PGRMC1 (progesterone receptor membrane component 1): a targetable protein with multiple functions in steroid signaling, P450 activation and drug binding. Pharmacol Ther. 2009;121:14\\u0026ndash;9. doi:\\u003cspan class=\\\"ExternalRef\\\"\\u003e\\u003cspan class=\\\"RefSource\\\"\\u003e10.1016/j.pharmthera.2008.09.006\\u003c/span\\u003e\\u003c/span\\u003e.\\u003c/span\\u003e\\u003c/li\\u003e \\u003cli\\u003e\\u003cspan\\u003eKim SY, Chu KC, Lee HR, Lee KS, Carey TE. Establishment and characterization of nine new head and neck cancer cell lines. Acta oto-laryngologica. 1997;117:775\\u0026ndash;84. doi:\\u003cspan class=\\\"ExternalRef\\\"\\u003e\\u003cspan class=\\\"RefSource\\\"\\u003e10.3109/00016489709113477\\u003c/span\\u003e\\u003c/span\\u003e.\\u003c/span\\u003e\\u003c/li\\u003e \\u003cli\\u003e\\u003cspan\\u003eGarc\\u0026eacute;s R, Mancha M. One-step lipid extraction and fatty acid methyl esters preparation from fresh plant tissues. Anal Biochem. 1993;211:139\\u0026ndash;43. doi:\\u003cspan class=\\\"ExternalRef\\\"\\u003e\\u003cspan class=\\\"RefSource\\\"\\u003e10.1006/abio.1993.1244\\u003c/span\\u003e\\u003c/span\\u003e.\\u003c/span\\u003e\\u003c/li\\u003e \\u003cli\\u003e\\u003cspan\\u003eIshimoto T, Nagano O, Yae T, Tamada M, Motohara T, Oshima H, et al. CD44 variant regulates redox status in cancer cells by stabilizing the xCT subunit of system xc(-) and thereby promotes tumor growth. Cancer cell. 2011;19:387\\u0026ndash;400. doi:\\u003cspan class=\\\"ExternalRef\\\"\\u003e\\u003cspan class=\\\"RefSource\\\"\\u003e10.1016/j.ccr.2011.01.038\\u003c/span\\u003e\\u003c/span\\u003e.\\u003c/span\\u003e\\u003c/li\\u003e \\u003cli\\u003e\\u003cspan\\u003eOjima I, Lichtenthal B, Lee S, Wang C, Wang X. Taxane anticancer agents: a patent perspective. Expert Opin Ther Pat. 2016;26:1\\u0026ndash;20. doi:\\u003cspan class=\\\"ExternalRef\\\"\\u003e\\u003cspan class=\\\"RefSource\\\"\\u003e10.1517/13543776.2016.1111872\\u003c/span\\u003e\\u003c/span\\u003e.\\u003c/span\\u003e\\u003c/li\\u003e \\u003cli\\u003e\\u003cspan\\u003eQu Q, Zeng F, Liu X, Wang QJ, Deng F. Fatty acid oxidation and carnitine palmitoyltransferase I: emerging therapeutic targets in cancer. Cell death disease. 2016;7:e2226. doi:\\u003cspan class=\\\"ExternalRef\\\"\\u003e\\u003cspan class=\\\"RefSource\\\"\\u003e10.1038/cddis.2016.132\\u003c/span\\u003e\\u003c/span\\u003e.\\u003c/span\\u003e\\u003c/li\\u003e \\u003cli\\u003e\\u003cspan\\u003eGutierrez A, Pan L, Groen RW, Baleydier F, Kentsis A, Marineau J, et al. Phenothiazines induce PP2A-mediated apoptosis in T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Clin Investig. 2014;124:644\\u0026ndash;55. doi:\\u003cspan class=\\\"ExternalRef\\\"\\u003e\\u003cspan class=\\\"RefSource\\\"\\u003e10.1172/jci65093\\u003c/span\\u003e\\u003c/span\\u003e.\\u003c/span\\u003e\\u003c/li\\u003e \\u003cli\\u003e\\u003cspan\\u003eAsperger H, Stamm N, Gierke B, Pawlak M, Hofmann U, Zanger UM, et al. Progesterone receptor membrane component 1 regulates lipid homeostasis and drives oncogenic signaling resulting in breast cancer progression. Breast cancer research: BCR. 2020;22:75. doi:\\u003cspan class=\\\"ExternalRef\\\"\\u003e\\u003cspan class=\\\"RefSource\\\"\\u003e10.1186/s13058-020-01312-8\\u003c/span\\u003e\\u003c/span\\u003e.\\u003c/span\\u003e\\u003c/li\\u003e \\u003cli\\u003e\\u003cspan\\u003eLodde V, Peluso JJ. A novel role for progesterone and progesterone receptor membrane component 1 in regulating spindle microtubule stability during rat and human ovarian cell mitosis. Biol Reprod. 2011;84:715\\u0026ndash;22. doi:\\u003cspan class=\\\"ExternalRef\\\"\\u003e\\u003cspan class=\\\"RefSource\\\"\\u003e10.1095/biolreprod.110.088385\\u003c/span\\u003e\\u003c/span\\u003e.\\u003c/span\\u003e\\u003c/li\\u003e \\u003cli\\u003e\\u003cspan\\u003eFonrose X, Ausseil F, Soleilhac E, Masson V, David B, Pouny I, et al. Parthenolide inhibits tubulin carboxypeptidase activity. Cancer research. 2007;67:3371\\u0026ndash;8. doi:\\u003cspan class=\\\"ExternalRef\\\"\\u003e\\u003cspan class=\\\"RefSource\\\"\\u003e10.1158/0008-5472.can-06-3732\\u003c/span\\u003e\\u003c/span\\u003e.\\u003c/span\\u003e\\u003c/li\\u003e \\u003cli\\u003e\\u003cspan\\u003eCui L, Liu P. Two Types of Contact Between Lipid Droplets and Mitochondria. Frontiers in cell developmental biology. 2020;8:618322. doi:\\u003cspan class=\\\"ExternalRef\\\"\\u003e\\u003cspan class=\\\"RefSource\\\"\\u003e10.3389/fcell.2020.618322\\u003c/span\\u003e\\u003c/span\\u003e.\\u003c/span\\u003e\\u003c/li\\u003e \\u003cli\\u003e\\u003cspan\\u003eStewart DA, Winnike JH, McRitchie SL, Clark RF, Pathmasiri WW, Sumner SJ. Metabolomics Analysis of Hormone-Responsive and Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cell Responses to Paclitaxel Identify Key Metabolic Differences. J Proteome Res. 2016;15:3225\\u0026ndash;40. doi:\\u003cspan class=\\\"ExternalRef\\\"\\u003e\\u003cspan class=\\\"RefSource\\\"\\u003e10.1021/acs.jproteome.6b00430\\u003c/span\\u003e\\u003c/span\\u003e.\\u003c/span\\u003e\\u003c/li\\u003e \\u003cli\\u003e\\u003cspan\\u003eCao Y. Adipocyte and lipid metabolism in cancer drug resistance. J Clin Investig. 2019;129:3006\\u0026ndash;17. doi:\\u003cspan class=\\\"ExternalRef\\\"\\u003e\\u003cspan class=\\\"RefSource\\\"\\u003e10.1172/jci127201\\u003c/span\\u003e\\u003c/span\\u003e.\\u003c/span\\u003e\\u003c/li\\u003e \\u003cli\\u003e\\u003cspan\\u003eBarbuti AM, Chen ZS. Paclitaxel Through the Ages of Anticancer Therapy: Exploring Its Role in Chemoresistance and Radiation Therapy. Cancers. 2015;7:2360\\u0026ndash;71. doi:\\u003cspan class=\\\"ExternalRef\\\"\\u003e\\u003cspan class=\\\"RefSource\\\"\\u003e10.3390/cancers7040897\\u003c/span\\u003e\\u003c/span\\u003e.\\u003c/span\\u003e\\u003c/li\\u003e \\u003cli\\u003e\\u003cspan\\u003eOrr GA, Verdier-Pinard P, McDaid H, Horwitz SB. Mechanisms of Taxol resistance related to microtubules. Oncogene. 2003;22:7280\\u0026ndash;95. doi:\\u003cspan class=\\\"ExternalRef\\\"\\u003e\\u003cspan class=\\\"RefSource\\\"\\u003e10.1038/sj.onc.1206934\\u003c/span\\u003e\\u003c/span\\u003e.\\u003c/span\\u003e\\u003c/li\\u003e \\u003cli\\u003e\\u003cspan\\u003eFriel AM, Zhang L, Pru CA, Clark NC, McCallum ML, Blok LJ, et al. Progesterone receptor membrane component 1 deficiency attenuates growth while promoting chemosensitivity of human endometrial xenograft tumors. Cancer letters. 2015;356:434\\u0026ndash;42. doi:\\u003cspan class=\\\"ExternalRef\\\"\\u003e\\u003cspan class=\\\"RefSource\\\"\\u003e10.1016/j.canlet.2014.09.036\\u003c/span\\u003e\\u003c/span\\u003e.\\u003c/span\\u003e\\u003c/li\\u003e \\u003cli\\u003e\\u003cspan\\u003eSchroeder B, Schulze RJ, Weller SG, Sletten AC, Casey CA, McNiven MA. The small GTPase Rab7 as a central regulator of hepatocellular lipophagy. Hepatology. 2015;61:1896\\u0026ndash;907. doi:\\u003cspan class=\\\"ExternalRef\\\"\\u003e\\u003cspan class=\\\"RefSource\\\"\\u003e10.1002/hep.27667\\u003c/span\\u003e\\u003c/span\\u003e.\\u003c/span\\u003e\\u003c/li\\u003e \\u003cli\\u003e\\u003cspan\\u003eHerms A, Bosch M, Reddy BJ, Schieber NL, Fajardo A, Rup\\u0026eacute;rez C, et al. AMPK activation promotes lipid droplet dispersion on detyrosinated microtubules to increase mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation. Nature communications. 2015;6:7176. doi:\\u003cspan class=\\\"ExternalRef\\\"\\u003e\\u003cspan class=\\\"RefSource\\\"\\u003e10.1038/ncomms8176\\u003c/span\\u003e\\u003c/span\\u003e.\\u003c/span\\u003e\\u003c/li\\u003e \\u003cli\\u003e\\u003cspan\\u003eRambold AS, Cohen S, Lippincott-Schwartz J. Fatty acid trafficking in starved cells: regulation by lipid droplet lipolysis, autophagy, and mitochondrial fusion dynamics. Developmental cell. 2015;32:678\\u0026ndash;92. doi:\\u003cspan class=\\\"ExternalRef\\\"\\u003e\\u003cspan class=\\\"RefSource\\\"\\u003e10.1016/j.devcel.2015.01.029\\u003c/span\\u003e\\u003c/span\\u003e.\\u003c/span\\u003e\\u003c/li\\u003e \\u003cli\\u003e\\u003cspan\\u003eBenador IY, Veliova M, Liesa M, Shirihai OS. Mitochondria Bound to Lipid Droplets: Where Mitochondrial Dynamics Regulate Lipid Storage and Utilization. Cell Metabol. 2019;29:827\\u0026ndash;35. doi:\\u003cspan class=\\\"ExternalRef\\\"\\u003e\\u003cspan class=\\\"RefSource\\\"\\u003e10.1016/j.cmet.2019.02.011\\u003c/span\\u003e\\u003c/span\\u003e.\\u003c/span\\u003e\\u003c/li\\u003e \\u003cli\\u003e\\u003cspan\\u003eMohan N, Sorokina EM, Verdeny IV, Alvarez AS, Lakadamyali M. Detyrosinated microtubules spatially constrain lysosomes facilitating lysosome-autophagosome fusion. J Cell Biol. 2019;218:632\\u0026ndash;43. doi:\\u003cspan class=\\\"ExternalRef\\\"\\u003e\\u003cspan class=\\\"RefSource\\\"\\u003e10.1083/jcb.201807124\\u003c/span\\u003e\\u003c/span\\u003e.\\u003c/span\\u003e\\u003c/li\\u003e \\u003cli\\u003e\\u003cspan\\u003eThejer BM, Adhikary PP, Teakel SL, Fang J, Weston PA, Gurusinghe S, et al. PGRMC1 effects on metabolism, genomic mutation and CpG methylation imply crucial roles in animal biology and disease. BMC molecular cell biology. 2020;21:26. doi:\\u003cspan class=\\\"ExternalRef\\\"\\u003e\\u003cspan class=\\\"RefSource\\\"\\u003e10.1186/s12860-020-00268-z\\u003c/span\\u003e\\u003c/span\\u003e.\\u003c/span\\u003e\\u003c/li\\u003e \\u003cli\\u003e\\u003cspan\\u003eSathyanarayan A, Mashek MT, Mashek DG. ATGL Promotes Autophagy/Lipophagy via SIRT1 to Control Hepatic Lipid Droplet Catabolism. Cell reports. 2017;19:1\\u0026ndash;9. doi:\\u003cspan class=\\\"ExternalRef\\\"\\u003e\\u003cspan class=\\\"RefSource\\\"\\u003e10.1016/j.celrep.2017.03.026\\u003c/span\\u003e\\u003c/span\\u003e.\\u003c/span\\u003e\\u003c/li\\u003e \\u003cli\\u003e\\u003cspan\\u003eLee N, Carlisle AE, Peppers A, Park SJ, Doshi MB, Spears ME, et al. xCT-Driven Expression of GPX4 Determines Sensitivity of Breast Cancer Cells to Ferroptosis Inducers. Antioxidants (Basel Switzerland). 2021;10. doi:\\u003cspan class=\\\"ExternalRef\\\"\\u003e\\u003cspan class=\\\"RefSource\\\"\\u003e10.3390/antiox10020317\\u003c/span\\u003e\\u003c/span\\u003e.\\u003c/span\\u003e\\u003c/li\\u003e\\u003c/ol\\u003e\"}],\"fulltextSource\":\"\",\"fullText\":\"\",\"funders\":[],\"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow\":false,\"hasManuscriptDocX\":true,\"hasOptedInToPreprint\":true,\"hasPassedJournalQc\":\"\",\"hasAnyPriority\":false,\"hideJournal\":false,\"highlight\":\"\",\"institution\":\"\",\"isAcceptedByJournal\":true,\"isAuthorSuppliedPdf\":false,\"isDeskRejected\":\"\",\"isHiddenFromSearch\":false,\"isInQc\":false,\"isInWorkflow\":true,\"isPdf\":false,\"isPdfUpToDate\":true,\"isWithdrawnOrRetracted\":false,\"journal\":{\"display\":true,\"email\":\"info@researchsquare.com\",\"identity\":\"journal-of-experimental-and-clinical-cancer-research\",\"isNatureJournal\":false,\"hasQc\":true,\"allowDirectSubmit\":false,\"externalIdentity\":\"jecc\",\"sideBox\":\"Learn more about [Journal of Experimental \\u0026 Clinical Cancer Research](http://jeccr.biomedcentral.com)\",\"snPcode\":\"\",\"submissionUrl\":\"https://www.editorialmanager.com/jecc/default.aspx\",\"title\":\"Journal of Experimental \\u0026 Clinical Cancer Research\",\"twitterHandle\":\"@OncoBioMed\",\"acdcEnabled\":true,\"dfaEnabled\":true,\"editorialSystem\":\"em\",\"reportingPortfolio\":\"BMC/SO AJ\",\"inReviewEnabled\":true,\"inReviewRevisionsEnabled\":true},\"keywords\":\"Progesterone receptor membrane component 1, ferroptosis, fatty acid oxidation, lipophagy, tubulin detyrosination\",\"lastPublishedDoi\":\"10.21203/rs.3.rs-810226/v1\",\"lastPublishedDoiUrl\":\"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-810226/v1\",\"license\":{\"name\":\"CC BY 4.0\",\"url\":\"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/\"},\"manuscriptAbstract\":\"\\u003ch2\\u003eBackground\\u003c/h2\\u003e \\u003cp\\u003eProgesterone receptor membrane component 1 (PGRMC1) is a heme-binding protein inducing dimerization with cytochrome P450, which mediates chemoresistance. Increased PGRMC1 expression is found in multiple types of resistant cancers but the role of PGRMC1 in ferroptosis of cancer cells remains unrevealed. Therefore, we examined the role of PGRMC1 in promoting ferroptosis in paclitaxel-tolerant persister cancer cells (PCC).\\u003c/p\\u003e\\u003ch2\\u003eMethods\\u003c/h2\\u003e \\u003cp\\u003eThe effects of ferroptosis inducers and PGRMC1 gene silencing/overexpression were tested on head and neck cancer (HNC) cell lines and mouse tumor xenograft models. The effects were analyzed about cell viability, death, lipid ROS and iron production, mRNA/protein expression and interaction, and lipid assays.\\u003c/p\\u003e\\u003ch2\\u003eResults\\u003c/h2\\u003e \\u003cp\\u003ePCC had more free fatty acids, lipid droplets, and fatty acid oxidation (FAO) than their parental cells. PCC was highly sensitive to inhibitors of system xc\\u003csup\\u003e\\u0026minus;\\u003c/sup\\u003e cystine/glutamate antiporter (xCT), such as erastin, sulfasalazine, and cyst(e)ine deprivation, but less sensitive to (1S,3R)-RSL3. PGRMC1 silencing in PCC reduced ferroptosis sensitivity by xCT inhibitors and PGRMC1 overexpression in parental cells increased ferroptosis by xCT inhibitors. Lipid droplets were degraded along with autophagy induction and autophagosome formation by erastin treatment in PCC. Lipophagy was accompanied by increased tubulin detyrosination, which was increased by SIRT1 activation but decreased by SIRT1 inhibition. FAO and lipophagy were also promoted by the interaction between lipid droplets and mitochondria.\\u003c/p\\u003e\\u003ch2\\u003eConclusion\\u003c/h2\\u003e \\u003cp\\u003ePGRMC1 expression increased FAO and ferroptosis sensitivity from \\u003cem\\u003ein vivo\\u003c/em\\u003e mice experiments. Our data suggest that PGRMC1 promotes ferroptosis by xCT inhibition in PCC.\\u003c/p\\u003e\",\"manuscriptTitle\":\"PGRMC1-dependent lipophagy promotes ferroptosis in paclitaxel-tolerant persister cancer cells\",\"msid\":\"\",\"msnumber\":\"\",\"nonDraftVersions\":[{\"code\":1,\"date\":\"2021-08-23 15:02:08\",\"doi\":\"10.21203/rs.3.rs-810226/v1\",\"editorialEvents\":[{\"type\":\"communityComments\",\"content\":0},{\"type\":\"decision\",\"content\":\"Major revision\",\"date\":\"2021-10-01T00:00:00+00:00\",\"index\":\"\",\"fulltext\":\"\"},{\"type\":\"editorInvitedReview\",\"content\":\"\",\"date\":\"2021-09-30T00:00:00+00:00\",\"index\":3,\"fulltext\":\"Recommendation: Reviewer's comments unavailable due to the journal's policy.\\n\"},{\"type\":\"editorInvitedReview\",\"content\":\"\",\"date\":\"2021-09-29T00:00:00+00:00\",\"index\":2,\"fulltext\":\"Recommendation: Reviewer's comments unavailable due to the journal's policy.\\n\"},{\"type\":\"reviewerAgreed\",\"content\":\"\",\"date\":\"2021-09-18T00:00:00+00:00\",\"index\":3,\"fulltext\":\"\"},{\"type\":\"reviewerAgreed\",\"content\":\"\",\"date\":\"2021-09-17T00:00:00+00:00\",\"index\":2,\"fulltext\":\"\"},{\"type\":\"editorInvitedReview\",\"content\":\"\",\"date\":\"2021-08-30T00:00:00+00:00\",\"index\":1,\"fulltext\":\"Recommendation: Reviewer's comments unavailable due to the journal's policy.\\n\"},{\"type\":\"editorInvitedReview\",\"content\":\"\",\"date\":\"2021-08-19T12:28:41+00:00\",\"index\":0,\"fulltext\":\"\"},{\"type\":\"reviewersInvited\",\"content\":\"\",\"date\":\"2021-08-19T10:24:09+00:00\",\"index\":\"\",\"fulltext\":\"\"},{\"type\":\"editorAssigned\",\"content\":\"\",\"date\":\"2021-08-19T00:00:00+00:00\",\"index\":\"\",\"fulltext\":\"\"},{\"type\":\"reviewerAgreed\",\"content\":\"\",\"date\":\"2021-08-19T00:00:00+00:00\",\"index\":1,\"fulltext\":\"\"},{\"type\":\"checksComplete\",\"content\":\"\",\"date\":\"2021-08-18T23:00:00+00:00\",\"index\":\"\",\"fulltext\":\"\"},{\"type\":\"editorInvited\",\"content\":\"\",\"date\":\"2021-08-18T23:00:00+00:00\",\"index\":\"\",\"fulltext\":\"\"},{\"type\":\"submitted\",\"content\":\"Journal of Experimental \\u0026 Clinical Cancer Research\",\"date\":\"2021-08-12T20:16:15+00:00\",\"index\":\"\",\"fulltext\":\"\"}],\"status\":\"published\",\"journal\":{\"display\":true,\"email\":\"info@researchsquare.com\",\"identity\":\"journal-of-experimental-and-clinical-cancer-research\",\"isNatureJournal\":false,\"hasQc\":true,\"allowDirectSubmit\":false,\"externalIdentity\":\"jecc\",\"sideBox\":\"Learn more about [Journal of Experimental \\u0026 Clinical Cancer Research](http://jeccr.biomedcentral.com)\",\"snPcode\":\"\",\"submissionUrl\":\"https://www.editorialmanager.com/jecc/default.aspx\",\"title\":\"Journal of Experimental \\u0026 Clinical Cancer Research\",\"twitterHandle\":\"@OncoBioMed\",\"acdcEnabled\":true,\"dfaEnabled\":true,\"editorialSystem\":\"em\",\"reportingPortfolio\":\"BMC/SO AJ\",\"inReviewEnabled\":true,\"inReviewRevisionsEnabled\":true}}],\"origin\":\"\",\"ownerIdentity\":\"b2488e77-0a0b-4756-99e8-d40b0216e846\",\"owner\":[],\"postedDate\":\"August 23rd, 2021\",\"published\":true,\"recentEditorialEvents\":[],\"rejectedJournal\":[],\"revision\":\"\",\"amendment\":\"\",\"status\":\"under-review\",\"subjectAreas\":[{\"id\":6626275,\"name\":\"Otorhinolaryngology\"},{\"id\":6626276,\"name\":\"Surgery\"}],\"tags\":[],\"updatedAt\":\"2021-11-03T18:10:01+00:00\",\"versionOfRecord\":[],\"versionCreatedAt\":\"2021-08-23 15:02:08\",\"video\":\"\",\"vorDoi\":\"\",\"vorDoiUrl\":\"\",\"workflowStages\":[]},\"version\":\"v1\",\"identity\":\"rs-810226\",\"journalConfig\":\"researchsquare\"},\"__N_SSP\":true},\"page\":\"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]\",\"query\":{\"redirect\":\"/article/rs-810226\",\"identity\":\"rs-810226\",\"version\":[\"v1\"]},\"buildId\":\"GqpaHPwrfC8PjnIFayRh5\",\"isFallback\":false,\"isExperimentalCompile\":false,\"dynamicIds\":[84888],\"gssp\":true,\"scriptLoader\":[]}","source_license":"CC-BY-4.0","license_restricted":false}