{"paper_id":"2b1327a7-ad36-49dd-903a-845c2e5c469f","body_text":"A retrospective study on indications and histopathological analysis of non-oncological hysterectomies in a tertiary care hospital\nDOI:\nhttps://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20204962Keywords:\nHysterectomy, Clinical diagnosis, Histopathological diagnosisAbstract\nBackground: An increase in the number of women undergoing hysterectomy especially in South India is of great concern. Whenever hysterectomy is performed, it is imperative that clinical diagnosis is accurate. The purpose of current study is to assess whether the histopathological diagnosis after surgery is correlated with the clinical diagnosis.\nMethods: This is a retrospective study conducted in the department of obstetrics and gynaecology at Indira Gandhi medical college and research institute Puducherry, from January 2018 to December 2018. Patients, who underwent hysterectomy for benign causes, were included in the study. Data was collected from the patients' case records. Whether the histopathological diagnosis was in tandem with the clinical diagnosis, was noted\nResults: Out of the 234 hysterectomies performed, 46.15% were by abdominal route and 53.84% were by vaginal route. 24.7% were TAH with BSO with mean age of 49.72 years. VH with PFR (46.5%) was the most common surgery done. Out of the 80 cases of fibroid, 66 (28.2%) were confirmed on histopathology. Histopathological diagnosis corroborated the clinical diagnosis in patients with ovarian cyst, fibroid with ovarian cyst and DUB. Adenomyosis was validated in 7 of 9 cases. Endometriosis of ovary was confirmed in 4 (1.7%) cases. In patients with pelvic organ prolapse, histopathology showed atrophic changes.\nConclusions: Accurate clinical diagnosis, supported by in-depth preoperative evaluation and a sound clinical knowledge helps to avoid unnecessary hysterectomies. It is imperative to study the histopathology of the operated specimen and confirm the appropriateness of the clinical indication.\nMetrics\nReferences\nCarlson KJ, Nichols DH, Schiff I. Indications for hysterectomy. N Engl J Med. 1993;328(12):856-60.\nCarlson KJ. MD Outcomes of Hysterectomy. Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1997;40(4):939-46.\nUzun R, Savaş A, Ertunç D, Tok E, Dilek S. The effect of abdominal hysterectomy performed for uterine leiomyoma on quality of life. J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009;19(1):1.\nKjerulff KH, Langenberg PW, Rhodes JC, Harvey LA, Guzinski GM, Stolley PD. Effectiveness of hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;95(3):319-26.\nBachmann GA. Hysterectomy, a critical review. J Reprod Med. 1990;35(9):839-62.\nDragisic KG, Milad MP. Sexual functioning and patient expectations of sexual functioning after hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190(5): 1416-8.\nWilmoth MC, Spinelli A. Sexual implications of gynecologic cancer treatments. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2000;29(4):413-21.\nFarquhar CM, Sadler L, Harvey SA, Stewart AW. The association of hysterectomy and menopause: a prospective cohort study. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;112(7):956-62.\nParker WH, Broder MS, Liu Z, Shoupe D, Farquhar C, Berek JS. Ovarian conservation at the time of hysterectomy for benign disease. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106(2):219-26.\nErekson EA, Weitzen S, Sung VW, Raker CA, Myers DL. Socioeconomic indicators and hysterectomy status in the United States, 2004. J Reprod Med. 2009;54(9):553-8.\nSchofield MJ, Hennrikus DJ, Redman S, Sanson-Fisher RW. Prevalence and characteristics of women who have had a hysterectomy in a community survey. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1991;31(2): 153-8.\nByles JE, Mishra G, Schofield M. Factors associated with hysterectomy among women in Australia. Health Place. 2000;6(4):301-8.\nWhiteman MK, Hillis SD, Jamieson DJ, Morrow B, Podgornik MN, Brett KM, et al. Inpatient hysterectomy surveillance in the United States, 2000-2004. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198(1):34e1-7.\nStankiewicz A, Pogany L, Popadiuk C. Prevalence of self-reported hysterectomy among Canadian women, 2000/2001-2008. Chronic Dis Inj Can. 2014;34(1): 30-5.\nDesai S, Campbell OM, Sinha T, Mahal A, Cousens S. Incidence and determinants of hysterectomy in a low-income setting in Gujarat, India. Health Policy Plan. 2017;32(1):68-78.\nPrusty RK, Choithani C, Gupta SD. Predictors of hysterectomy among married women 15–49 years in India. ReprodHealth. 2018;15:3.\nVan der Meij E, Emanuel MH. Hysterectomy for heavy menstrual bleeding. Womens Health. 2016;12 (1):63-9.\nPapadopoulos MS, Tolikas AC, Miliaras DE. Hysterectomy-current methods and alternatives for benign indications. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2010;2010: 356740.\nKey statistics from the National survey of family growth, Atlanta, GA, Centers for disease control and prevention 2015. Available at: http://www.cdc. gov/nchs/nsfg/key_statistics/h.htm#hysterectomy. Accessed on 20 August 2020.\nMoorman PG, Myers ER, Schildkraut JM, Iversen ES, Wang F, Warren N. Effect of hysterectomy with ovarian preservation on ovarian function. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118(6):1271-9.\nMagon N, Divakar H, Kirpalni A. The use, misuse, and abuse of hysterectomy. J Mid-Life Health. 2013; 4(1):1.\nBroder MS, Kanouse DE, Mittman BS, Bernstein SJ. The appropriateness of recommendations for hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;95(2):199-205.\nLonnée-Hoffmann R, Pinas I. Effects of Hysterectomy on Sexual Function. Curr Sex Health Rep. 2014;6(4):244-51.\nTiwana KK, Nibhoria S, Monga T, Phutela R. Histopathological Audit of 373 Nononcological Hysterectomies in a teaching hospital. Pathol Res Int.2014;2014:468715.\nVerma D, Singh P, Kulshrestha R. Analysis of histopathological examination of the hysterectomy specimens in a north Indian teaching institute. Int J Res Med Sci. 2016;4(11):4753-8.\nKoothan V, Vijay A, Maran G, Shreelakshmi L. Prevalence and burden of adenomyosis in hysterectomy specimens for benign abnormal uterine bleeding in a tertiary care institute in Pondicherry, India. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2016;5(4):1119-23.\nSingh P, Jaiswal VK, Garg P. Endometrial patterns in abnormal uterine bleeding. Int J Biomed Res. 2016;7(5):244-50.\nKaur S, Pandey D, Shine A. Hysterectomy for Dysfunctional Uterine Bleeding (DUB) in the era of uterine conservation. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2015;4:1133-6.\nZanelotti A, Decherney AH. Surgery and Endometriosis. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2017;60(3): 477-484.\nKhadilkar S. Does saving uterus save ovaries?. J Obstet Gynecol India. 2020;70:99-102.","source_license":"CC0","license_restricted":false}