{"paper_id":"24fbfef8-6eae-453e-830a-ed5f7ad1fa7d","body_text":"Posttraumatic cervical conditions: prevention of the complications after microivasive interventions\nDOI:\nhttps://doi.org/10.31640/JVD.1-2.2018(21)Keywords:\ncervical erosive ectropion, hormonal therapy, postoperative complications, implant endometriosis.Abstract\nThe paper is aimed at optimal treatment of posttraumatic cervical pathology. 192 patients with cervical erosive ectropion (67 patients with CIN I) have been observed. The results of the conventional treatment made according to the clinical protocols (control group; n = 64) have been compared with the results of the patient's management according to the proposed algorithm (main group; n = 128). The algorithm includes microsurgical intervention, prolonged use of combined oral contraceptives or dienogest during 6–12 weeks, non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs immediately after excision, and regenerative agents not earlier than at the fourth week after the excision. The six months after the minor operation the positive therapeutic effect was 1,7 times higher in the main group. The frequency of complications was significantly lower: implant cervical endometriosis – 3,6 times, retention cysts – 4,2 times, abnormal scarring – 3,8 times, relapses of endocervical ectopia and CIN – 2,2 times, postcoagulation hemorrhage – 2,75 times, leukoplakia – 2,6 times. The use of integrated algorithm in the treatment of the cervical erosive ectropion is clinical reasonable.\nDownloads\nReferences\nAphar B. S., Brotsman H. L., Shpytser M. Klynycheskaia kolposkopyia. Ylliustryrovannoe rukovodstvo: Per. s anhl. / Pod obshch. red. V. N. Prylepskoi. – M.: Prakt. medytsyna, 2012. – 496 s.\nBadretdynova F. F., Hlebova N. N., Korotkova L. A. y dr. Akusherskaia travma y rubtsovaia deformatsyia sheiky matky. Nekotorыe spornыe voprosы problemы (obzor lyteraturы) // Med. nauky. – 2016. – № 5. – S. 23–31.\nHromova A. M., Krutikova E. I., Nesterenko L. A., Martynenko V. B. Dvokhetapna ekstsyziia – metod vyboru pry likuvanni dobroiakisnykh epidermizuiuchykh protsesiv na shyitsi matky // Zb. nauk. prats Asotsiatsii akusheriv-hinekolohiv Ukrainy. – K.: Intermed, 2011. – S. 224–229.\nKyzhaev Yu. E. Kompleksnoe lechenye bolnыkh s rubtsovoi deformatsyei sheiky matky. Avtoref. … dys. kand. med. nauk. – M., 2009. – 23 s.\nKorolenkova L. Y. Konyzatsyy sheiky matky v ambulatornoi praktyke u bolnыkh CIN tiazheloi stepeny – kak povыsyt эffektyvnost operatsyy // Materyalы vseros. konh. s mezhdunar. uchastyem «Ambulatorno-polyklynycheskaia praktyka – v эpytsentre zhenskoho zdorovia». – M., 2012. – S. 255–256.\nLyhyrda N. F., Krotevych M. S., Svyntsytskyi V. S., Skovoroda L. V. Do pytannia diahnostyky ta likuvannia dysplazii epiteliiu shyiky matky, shcho suprovodzhuiutsia keratozom // Zdorove zhenshchynы. – 2016. – Vyp. 112, № 6. – S. 62–69.\nMarshetta Zh., Dekamp F. Kolposkopyia. Metod y dyahnostyka: Per. s fr. / Pod obshch. red. prof. V. N. Prylepskoi. – M.: MEDpress-ynfom, 2009. – 200 s.\nMynkyna H. N. Tservykalnыi rak y hormonalnыe kontratseptyvы (obzor lyteraturы) // Doktor Ru. – 2014. – Vyp. 5, № 1. – S. 56–59.\nProlonhyrovannaia kontratseptsyia. Udobstvo kak zaloh nadёzhnosty // Pod red. V. E. Radzynskoho. – M.: StatusPaesens, 2014. – 24 s.\nRadyovolna y arhonovaia plazma v praktyke akushera-hynekoloha / Pod red. V. E. Radzynskoho, E. Yu. Hlukhova. – M.: Status Praesens, 2016. – 216 s.\nCenchuk A. Ya., Savrun S. S., Samsonova V. V. y dr. Profylaktyka vospalytelnыkh oslozhnenyi y retsydyvov zabolevanyi sheiky matky posle ykh khyrurhycheskoho lechenyia // Zdorove zhenshchynы. – 2014. – Vyp. 87, № 1. – C. 157–161.\nFyrychenko S. V., Manukhyn Y. B., Mynkyna H. N. y dr. Nekrasyvaia sheika matky. Chto delat? (kolposkopycheskaia kartyna bez pryznakov VPCh-assotsyyrovannoho porazhenyia) // Hynekolohyia. – 2013. – № 4. – S. 39–44.\nSheika matky vlahalyshche, vulva. Fyzyolohyia, patolohyia, kolposkopyia, эstetycheskaia korrektsyia: Rukovodstvo dlia praktykuiushchykh vrachei / Pod red. S. Y. Rohovskoi, E. V. Lypovoi. – M.: Status Praesens, 2014. – 832 c.\nCuzick J., Bergeron C., von Knebel Doebieritz M. et al. New technologies and procedures for cervical cancer screening // Vaccine. – 2012. – Vol. 30, N 5. – P. 107–116.\nJohnson Neil P. Hummelshoj Lone Reply for the World Endometriosis Society Montpellier. Consensus on current management of endometriosis // Consortium. Hum. Reprod. – 2013. – Vol. 28, N 11. – P. 1143–1150.\nLidegaard О. Hormonal contraception and thromboembolic risk in midlife women // Maturitas. – 2013. – Vol. 74, N 1. – P. 1–2.\nParikh R., Brotzman S., Anasti J. N. Cervical lacerations: some surprising facts // Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. – 2007. – 196. – N 5. – Р. 7–8.\nRogovskaya S. I, Shabalova I. P., Mikheeva I. V. et al. Human Papillomavirus Prevalence and Type-Distribution, Cervical Cancer Screening Practices and Current Status of Vaccination Implementation the Russian Federation, The Western Countries of the former Soviet Union, Caucasus region and Central Asia // Vaccine. – 2013. – Vol. 31S. – P. 46–58.\nDownloads\nPublished\nHow to Cite\nIssue\nSection\nLicense\nCopyright (c) 2018 E. I. Krutikova, A. M. Gromova\nThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.","source_license":"CC0","license_restricted":false}