{"paper_id":"2417c236-c100-4c17-84c4-c720e20d4a0f","body_text":"The association between genetic polymorphisms and clinical disease has long been recognized. For example, a relationship between blood group and gastrointestinal cancer was described in the 1950s ( Billington, 1956 ). More recently, technological advances in molecular biology have fuelled the interest in molecular polymorphisms and their influence on the susceptibility and clinical presentation of diseases ( Tempfer  et al ., 2004 ).\nMany aspects of female reproductive function are strongly influenced by genetic factors, and numerous studies have attempted to identify susceptibility genes for disorders affecting female fertility such as polycystic ovary syndrome, endometriosis, fibroids, cancer (ovarian, vulvar, cervical), premature ovarian failure, recurrent pregnancy loss and pre-eclampsia ( Levanat  et al ., 2004 ;  Modugno, 2004 ;  Escobar-Morreale  et al ., 2005 ;  Goswami and Conway, 2005 ;  Tempfer  et al ., 2005 ;  Ferreira  et al ., 2006 ;  Layman, 2006 ). For many of these conditions, the search for genetic disease markers is ongoing, and no strong candidate has yet emerged.\nEndometriosis is characterized by the presence and growth of endometrial cells outside the uterus, which impair fertility ( Wenzl  et al ., 2003 ;  Halis and Arici, 2004 ), and the disease has a strong genetic component ( Treloar  et al ., 1999 ;  Bischoff and Simpson, 2004 ;  Vigano  et al ., 2007 ). In a study of the genetic influence on endometriosis risk in an Australian twin sample, for example, the risk ratio of affected versus population prevalence was 3.58 for monozygotic twins and 2.32 for dizygotic twins ( Treloar  et al ., 1999 ). Clarifying the genetic etiology of endometriosis would have implications for diagnosis, identification of individuals at risk and the development of targeted therapeutics.\nThis disorder has been the focus of a large number of association studies investigating a wide variety of polymorphisms. Previous reviews assessed the possible role of specific polymorphisms or groups of polymorphisms, indicating that the number of robust associations may be low ( Falconer  et al ., 2007 ). Some have even challenged the evidence for endometriosis having a genetic background ( Di and Guo, 2007 ).\nIn this review, we assess evidence for the role of genetic polymorphisms in endometriosis. We present a systematic review of the published literature across all polymorphisms investigated in relation to endometriosis. We have evaluated the reliability and strength of the evidence for each of the 114 selected studies and discuss methods for improving association studies. However, to enable proper evalauation of the studies, we first explore the methodology of molecular association.\n\nThe genetic basis of disease may be elucidated in different ways. One approach is to scan across the genome to identify markers/genes of interest; a second approach is to investigate specific ‘candidate’ genes. We discuss these approaches below, and provide examples of such studies in endometriosis.\nGenome-wide linkage analysis using affected sibling-pairs has been applied to endometriosis by Australian, British and Icelandic groups ( Stefansson  et al ., 1998 ;  Treloar  et al ., 2000 ;  Kennedy  et al ., 2001 ). These studies aim to find chromosomal regions shared by related individuals harbouring disease-predisposing genes. In these linkage studies, which are conceptually different from case–control studies in unrelated individuals, a possible informative locus on chromosome 10q has been reported ( Treloar  et al ., 2000 ). In addition, in a separate linkage analysis of families with three or more affected members,  Zondervan  et al . (2007 ) suggested that there may be one or more high-penetrance susceptibility loci for endometriosis on chromosome 7. A dominant mode of inheritance with reduced penetrance and a recessive mode of inheritance with high penetrance have been suggested for these potential genetic variants. To our knowledge, genome-wide genetic association studies on unrelated individuals have not been carried out.\nGenetic case–control studies identify markers/genes that are associated with a trait of interest, such as a given disease. Genetic association studies do not, however, prove an etiological link between the polymorphism and/or the gene in question and the investigated trait. Once identified, the association of a specific genetic marker within a candidate gene with the trait should be investigated further. Specifically, it has to be clarified, whether the allele of interest has a direct biological effect or whether the association is based on biological effects downstream of the allele, which are in linkage disequilibrium. Since linkage disequilibrium may vary in different populations, this is an important source of inconsistency.\nA particular problem in interpreting the results from genetic association studies in endometriosis is linked to the fact that this is not a monogenic trait but a complex trait. Therefore, various genetic factors can be expected to have an effect with an additional level of variation regarding the individual effect sizes. Especially small effect sizes may be easily missed in individual studies with small sample sizes. Common methodological problems in genetic association studies include low sample size, chance findings, multiple comparisons and subsequent type I error inflation, different ethnic backgrounds of the study subjects, varying disease definitions and inclusion/exclusion criteria and ascertainment bias. To help overcome these methodological problems,  Zondervan  et al . (2002 ) proposed the following criteria for case–control studies to identify an association between genetic polymorphisms and endometriosis: (i) use newly diagnosed, i.e. incident, cases with endometriosis, (ii) collect information predating symptoms and (iii) use at least one population-based female control group matched for unadjustable confounders and ideally also screened for pelvic symptoms. These criteria for high-quality case–control studies, however, have not been fulfilled by the majority of the studies discussed in this review. Therefore, positive associations between genetic polymorphisms and endometriosis have to be interpreted with caution.\nEthnic background is an important source of variation. As illustrated by this review, genetic associations are often inconsistent across ethnic barriers, which may be due to different frequencies of polymorphic alleles as well as gene–gene interactions. In this respect, a genetic association, although valid in a specific ethnic population, may not be relevant for individuals of another ethnicity. This has to be acknowledged when judging the external validity of any genetic association study.\nSome of these methodological problems can be overcome—at least in part—by summarizing data from individual studies in the form of a meta-analysis. This tool has been increasingly used to confirm or rule out associations. Applying meta-analysis can be generally expected to confirm only a fraction of associations previously reported in individual small studies. Also, a strong association in individual studies with a  P -value <0.001 has been reported to be a good predictor of confirmation in a meta-analysis ( Lohmueller  et al ., 2003 ).\nIn this review, we have assessed the quality of evidence for every group of polymorphisms investigated in endometriosis association studies according to the agreement between studies, the presence or absence of meta-analyses and the strength of the association.\n\nWe systematically searched the PubMed and EMBASE databases for gene association studies published up to the end of August 2007 using the term ‘endometriosis’ combined with ‘polymorphism OR polymorphisms’ or ‘mutation OR mutations’. The search was not limited by language of publication. Translations of non-English papers were not obtained. The principle author (C.B.T.) selected relevant studies using the following criteria: all studies investigating polymorphic genetic variants with cases, i.e. women with a clinical and/or surgical diagnosis of endometriosis irrespective of disease stage, and with controls, i.e. women irrespective of definition of controls, listing absolute numbers of the respective genotype distributions. The interpretation of the consistency of an association with endometriosis always refers to a specific polymorphism and not to any investigated polymorphism in a specific gene.\n\nThe search for endometriosis susceptibility polymorphisms was focused mainly on genes involved in inflammation, sex steroid regulation, metabolism, biosynthesis, detoxification, vascular function and tissue remodelling.\nIt is widely accepted that endometriosis is an inflammatory process, associated with altered immune cell function, immune cell numbers, and elevated levels of inflammatory cytokines ( Agic  et al ., 2006 ). This observation has led researchers to investigate the effects of polymorphisms in genes encoding cytokines and other molecules involved in inflammation (see Table  I ).\nPolymorphisms of genes encoding inflammatory mediators, which have been investigated for their role in endometriosis\nGenes are grouped alphabetically, and studies showing positive or negative associations of these genes with disease susceptibility and/or positive associations with phenotype are presented. RFLP, restriction fragment-length polymorphism; VNTR, variable number of tandem repeats.\nIn Taiwanese women, the −509C/T promoter polymorphism in the transforming growth factor (TGF) β1 gene ( Hsieh  et al ., 2005f ), the 881T/C polymorphism in the interleukin (IL)-2 receptor β gene ( Hsieh  et al ., 2005b ) and the −627A/C promoter polymorphism in the IL-10 gene ( Hsieh  et al ., 2003 ) have all been associated to endometriosis susceptibility. Two polymorphisms in the promoter region of the IL-10 gene, −1082G/A and −592C/A [note that this is the same as the −627A/C single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) studied by  Hsieh  et al . (2003) ], have been investigated in Japanese women but do not appear to influence endometriosis susceptibility in this population ( Kitawaki  et al ., 2002 ). However, the same research group found that the genotype for the CA repeat microsatellite in the interferon-γ gene may have an effect on endometriosis susceptibility in Japanese women ( Kitawaki  et al ., 2004 ). Polymorphisms in genes encoding other interleukins (IL-1β, IL-4, IL-6 and IL-18) and their receptors (IL-1 receptor and IL-12 receptor β) have been investigated but failed to show a consistent association with endometriosis susceptibility ( Hsieh  et al ., 2001a ,  2002 ,  2005b ;  Lee  et al ., 2002 ;  Wieser  et al ., 2003a ,  b ;  Bhanoori  et al ., 2005b ;  Kitawaki  et al ., 2006 ;  Wen  et al ., 2006 ).  Wieser  et al . (2003a)  suggest that the IL-6 promoter polymorphism 174G/C predisposes women to endometriosis with chocolate cysts. In one study, carriage of the IL-1 receptor antagonist A2 allele was associated with endometriosis in a Chinese population ( Wen  et al ., 2006 ).  D’Amora  et al . (2006)  also reported that the BsrBI C/A, but not the PstI C/T polymorphism of the IL-1 receptor gene, is associated with a reduced risk of endometriosis.\nThe insulin-like growth factor II (IGF2) ApaI polymorphism was not found to be associated with endometriosis in Taiwanese women ( Hsieh  et al ., 2004c ). Also, a polymorphism in the  TGF  beta 1 gene (509C/T) was not associated with deep infiltrating endometriosis in Dutch women ( van Kaam  et al ., 2007a ).\nA number of groups have investigated a possible link between polymorphisms in the tumour necrosis factor ( TNF ) gene and increased endometriosis risk. Polymorphisms in the promoter region of the TNF-α gene do not appear to influence endometriosis risk in Korean, Taiwanese or Caucasian women ( Hsieh  et al ., 2002 ;  Lee  et al ., 2002 ;  Wieser  et al ., 2002a ). An Australian study investigating 26 polymorphisms in the promoter and coding regions of TNF also found no association with endometriosis ( Zhao  et al ., 2007 ). However, the −1031T/C  TNF  promoter polymorphism may affect disease severity in Japanese women ( Asghar  et al ., 2004 ). In Japanese women, the TNF-U01 haplotype (−1031T, −863C, −857C) has also been linked to endometriosis susceptibility, although it should be noted that this haplotype is in strong linkage disequilibrium with the  HLA-B * 0702  allele, making it difficult to determine which gene is responsible for the association ( Teramoto  et al ., 2004 ). A Chinese study found an association between endometriosis and the +252 polymorphism in intron 1 of the  TNF  beta gene ( Luo  et al ., 2006 ).\nElevated levels of the pro-inflammatory molecule nitric oxide (NO) have been reported in women with endometriosis ( Wu  et al ., 2003 ). Endothelial NO synthase catalyses the production of NO, and the p.E298D polymorphism in the  NOS3  gene has been associated with endometriosis susceptibility ( Zervou  et al ., 2003 ). Intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) is thought to mediate interactions between endometrial cells and lymphocytes during the pathogenesis of endometriosis ( Vigano  et al ., 2003 ). In Caucasian women, the p.G241R polymorphism in the  ICAM1  gene may influence disease severity ( Vigano  et al ., 2003 ), but neither this nor the p.K469E polymorphism appear to have a direct influence on endometriosis susceptibility in either Caucasian or Japanese women ( Vigano  et al ., 2003 ;  Yamashita  et al ., 2005 ;  Kitawaki  et al ., 2006 ). The PmII C/T polymorphism of the epithelial cadherin ( CDH1 ) gene was associated with late-stage endometriosis in Taiwanese women ( Hsieh  et al ., 2005c ). In a Chinese study, the  CDH1  3′-UTR C/T polymorphism, but not the −160C/A or −347G/GA promoter polymorphisms, was associated with endometriosis ( Shan  et al ., 2007 ).\nHuman leukocyte antigens (HLAs) are key components of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC), which is involved in immune cell signalling processes such as T-cell activation. HLA genes involved in both MHC I ( HLA-A  and  HLA-B ) and MHC II ( HLA-DPB1 ,  HLA-DQB1  and  HLA-DRB1 ) have been studied in women with endometriosis. A study of Chinese women found that  HLA-B  genotype, but not  HLA-A  genotype, influences endometriosis susceptibility ( Wang  et al ., 2001 ). In Japanese women, both the  HLA-DRB1*1403  and  HLA-DQB1*0301  alleles have been linked to increased endometriosis risk, whereas  HLA-DPB1  alleles do not appear to affect susceptibility ( Ishii  et al ., 2002 ,  2003 ). It should be noted that the  HLA-DRB1  and  HLA-DQB1  genes are in strong linkage disequilibrium ( de Bakker  et al ., 2006 ), which may explain why they both show an association with endometriosis. Studies of Chinese and Korean women investigating many of the known alleles of the  HLA-DRB1  gene found no association between these alleles and endometriosis susceptibility in these populations ( Wang  et al ., 2002 ;  Whang  et al ., 2006 ). Two polymorphisms in the cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 ( CTLA -4) gene were found not to be associated with endometriosis ( Vigano  et al ., 2005 ).\nRegulation upon Activation Normal T cell Expressed and Secreted (RANTES, recently renamed  CCL5 ) is an inflammatory cytokine that has been implicated in the induction of monocyte migration in the peritoneal fluid of women with endometriosis ( Pritts  et al ., 2002 ). Although the −403G/A and −28C/G polymorphisms in the  CCL5  gene and the delta32 and p.V64I polymorphisms in the RANTES receptor genes,  CCR5  and  CCR2 , respectively, do not appear to affect endometriosis susceptibility ( Antinolo  et al ., 2003 ,  2004 ), the p.P12A polymorphism in the gene encoding PPAR-γ ( PPARG ), which regulates the expression of  CCL5 , has been linked to an increased risk of endometriosis ( Dogan  et al ., 2004 ). On the other hand, no association was found in Japanese women between the  PPARG  p.P12A polymorphism and endometriosis, but an association was found with the exon 6 161C/T polymorphism in that same gene ( Kiyomizu  et al ., 2006 ).\nNo consistent evidence linking endometriosis with specific polymorphisms of genes coding for inflammatory mediators is available. A number of polymorphisms have been found to be associated with endometriosis in selected populations (Table  I ). However, these associations have not been independently confirmed across ethnic barriers, either because only single studies are available or because other studies investigating these polymorphisms reported no association. Nor have meta-analyses of these studies been published. Therefore, no specific polymorphisms of genes encoding inflammatory mediators have been convincingly shown to play a role in the susceptibility to endometriosis.\nInvestigations of the influence of polymorphisms in genes encoding sex hormones and hormone regulators are set out in Table  II .\nPolymorphisms of genes encoding sex hormones and hormone regulators, which have been investigated for their role in endometriosis\nGenes are grouped alphabetically, and studies showing positive or negative associations of these genes with disease susceptibility and/or positive associations with phenotype are presented.  † Not a case–control study;  ‡ Parent–offspring study. RFLP, restriction fragment-length polymorphism; SNP, single-nucleotide polymorphism.\nThe influence of estrogen receptor gene ( ESR1 ) polymorphisms has been investigated both in European and in Asian women with endometriosis. The XbaI (−351A/G) and the PvuII (−397T/C) restriction fragment-length polymorphisms (RFLPs) were not associated with endometriosis in a Korean population ( Kim  et al ., 2005b ), but appear to affect endometriosis susceptibility in Taiwanese women ( Hsieh  et al ., 2007b ). The association between endometriosis and the PvuII RFLP (−397T/C) was also found in Greek and Italian women ( Georgiou  et al ., 1999 ;  Luisi  et al ., 2006 ), and has been shown to influence disease severity, but not susceptibility, in German and Egyptian women ( El-Gindi  et al ., 2002 ;  Renner  et al ., 2006 ). This polymorphism was not found to affect endometriosis susceptibility in Korean women ( Kim  et al ., 2005b ), and studies investigating its importance in Japanese women have reported conflicting results ( Kitawaki  et al ., 2001 ;  Wang  et al ., 2004 ). An Austrian group investigated the effect of the  ESR1  −397T/C polymorphism, which they named IVS1−401T/C, but found no association with endometriosis susceptibility ( Huber  et al ., 2005 ). A TA repeat microsatellite upstream of the  ESR1  gene has been linked to endometriosis susceptibility in Greek, Taiwanese and Korean women ( Georgiou  et al ., 1999 ;  Kim  et al ., 2005b ;  Hsieh  et al ., 2005d ), and has been associated with susceptibility to mild endometriosis in Korean women ( Kim  et al ., 2005b ). Studies of Japanese, Korean and Italian women found no link between the XbaI RFLP (−351A/C) in the  ESR1  gene and endometriosis susceptibility ( Wang  et al ., 2004 ;  Kim  et al ., 2005b ;  Luisi  et al ., 2006 ), although a study of German women suggested that it may influence lesion severity ( Renner  et al ., 2006 ). The AluI RFLP (1730A/G) in the  ESR2  gene was linked to an increased risk of stage IV endometriosis in Japanese women ( Wang  et al ., 2004 ), but was not shown to influence disease susceptibility in groups of Italian and Korean women ( Luisi  et al ., 2006 ;  Lee  et al ., 2007 ).\nGroups in Austria, Brazil and Italy have demonstrated a link between the PROGINS polymorphism in the  PGR  gene and endometriosis susceptibility ( Wieser  et al ., 2002b ;  Lattuada  et al ., 2004a ;  De Carvalho  et al ., 2007 ). A study of Dutch women with deep infiltrating endometriosis found no association with PROGINS, but did observe an association with the  PGR  331G/A polymorphism ( van Kaam  et al ., 2007b ). A study from India ( Govindan  et al ., 2007 ) and an analysis of pooled data from an Australian group who conducted several studies investigating the PROGINS polymorphism and five SNPs in the  PGR  gene, indicated that there was no association with endometriosis susceptibility for any of these variants ( Treloar  et al ., 2005a ).\nThe CAG repeat microsatellite in the  AR  gene has been linked to an increased risk of uterine fibroids, and the 21 CAG repeat allele showed an association with endometriosis susceptibility in Taiwanese women ( Hsieh  et al ., 2001b ). However, an Italian study found no association between CAG repeat length and endometriosis susceptibility ( Lattuada  et al ., 2004c ). Receptor interacting protein 140 co-regulates the activities of estrogen and progesterone receptors and is essential for female fertility ( Caballero  et al ., 2005 ). The p.R448G polymorphism in the gene encoding this protein ( NRIP1 ) has been linked to endometriosis susceptibility in Spanish women ( Caballero  et al ., 2005 ).\nNo consistent evidence linking specific polymorphisms of genes encoding proteins involved in sex hormone activity with endometriosis is available. A number of polymorphisms have been found to be associated with endometriosis in selected populations (Table  II ). However, these associations have not been independently confirmed across ethnic barriers, either because only single studies are available or because other studies investigating the respective polymorphisms reported no association. A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies investigating sex steroid biosynthesis and sex steroid receptors in women with endometriosis has been published, demonstrating no consistent association of the investigated polymorphisms with endometriosis ( Guo, 2006a ). Therefore, no specific polymorphisms of genes encoding proteins involved in sex hormone activity have been convincingly shown to play a role in the susceptibility to endometriosis.\nThe 17-β hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 ( HSD17B1)  gene encodes a key enzyme involved in testosterone biosynthesis and estrogen metabolism. The p.S312G polymorphism in this gene has been linked to an increased risk of endometriosis in Japanese women ( Tsuchiya  et al ., 2005b ), and the −27A/C (vIV) polymorphism was associated with an increased risk of endometriosis in a cohort of Austrian women ( Huber  et al ., 2005 ).\nThe  CYP1A1  and  CYP1B1  genes encode phase I detoxification enzymes involved in estrogen metabolism. Studies in Austrian, Indian, Chinese, Japanese and Taiwanese populations found no association between known polymorphisms in the  CYP1A1  gene and susceptibility to endometriosis ( Peng  et al ., 2002 ;  Iizuka  et al ., 2003 ;  Babu  et al ., 2005 ;  Huber  et al ., 2005 ;  Juo  et al ., 2006 ). However, studies in Greece and the UK indicated that the MspI RFLP (6235T/C) in the  CYP1A1  gene may influence endometriosis susceptibility when associated with the  GSTM1  null deletion variant ( Arvanitis  et al ., 2001 ,  2003 ;  Hadfield  et al ., 2001 ).  Peng  et al . (2003a)  reported that the CYP1A1 4889A/G polymorphism is associated with endometriosis in Chinese women. An Austrian group investigated the p.N453S polymorphism in the  CYP1B1  gene but this did not appear to influence susceptibility to endometriosis ( Huber  et al ., 2005 ). In a Korean study, the CYP1B1 p.L432V, Asp(449)C/T and p.A453S polymorphisms were not associated with late stage endometriosis ( Cho  et al ., 2007 ). Polymorphisms in genes encoding other enzymes involved in estrogen metabolism ( COMT ) or phase I detoxification (myeloperoxidase) have also been investigated, but failed to show an effect on endometriosis susceptibility ( Wieser  et al ., 2002c ;  Hsieh  et al ., 2004a ;  Huber  et al ., 2005 ;  Juo  et al ., 2006 ).\nThe  CYP17A1  and  CYP19A1  genes both code for enzymes involved in estrogen biosynthesis. Whereas studies of Taiwanese women have shown a possible relation between endometriosis susceptibility and the −34T/C polymorphism in the promoter region of the  CYP17A1  gene ( Hsieh  et al ., 2004b ,  2005d ), no strong association with  CYP17A1  polymorphisms has been found in UK, Brazilian, Austrian, Taiwanese or Japanese study populations ( Kado  et al ., 2002 ;  Asghar  et al ., 2005 ;  Huber  et al ., 2005 ;  Juo  et al ., 2006 ;  De Carvalho  et al ., 2007 ). The TTTA repeat microsatellite in the  CYP19A1  gene may increase the risk of endometriosis in Greek women ( Arvanitis  et al ., 2003 ), and shows a weak association in Japanese women ( Kado  et al ., 2002 ). Another polymorphism in this gene (p.R264C) was studied in Japanese and Austrian women, but did not appear to influence endometriosis susceptibility ( Huber  et al ., 2005 ;  Tsuchiya  et al ., 2005b ).\nThe  GSTM1, GSTP1, GSTT1 ,  NAT1  and  NAT2  genes all encode phase II detoxification enzymes. Null deletions in the glutathione- S -transferase  GSTM1  gene have been linked to an increased risk of endometriosis in French, Russian, Indian, Chinese and Taiwanese women ( Baranova  et al ., 1997 ,  1999 ;  Ivashchenko  et al ., 2003 ;  Peng  et al ., 2003b ;  Hsieh  et al ., 2004a ;  Babu  et al ., 2005 ). These null deletions were not shown to affect endometriosis susceptibility in Korean, Japanese and Australian study populations ( Baxter  et al ., 2001 ;  Iizuka  et al ., 2003 ;  Morizane  et al ., 2004 ;  Hur  et al ., 2005 ), although the Australian study indicated that  GSTM1  null deletion may predispose endometrial lesions to malignant transformation ( Baxter  et al ., 2001 ). The p.I105V polymorphism in the  GSTP1  gene is associated with an increased risk of endometriosis in Turkish women ( Ertunc  et al ., 2005 ), but does not seem to have an effect on susceptibility in Korean women ( Hur  et al ., 2005 ). Studies conducted in Greece, France, India, UK, Japan and Korea showed no correlation between the  GSTT1  null deletion variant and endometriosis susceptibility ( Baranova  et al ., 1999 ;  Arvanitis  et al ., 2003 ;  Morizane  et al ., 2004 ;  Babu  et al ., 2005 ;  Hur  et al ., 2005 ), whereas a study of Russian women did show such an association ( Ivashchenko  et al ., 2003 ). Several studies have investigated the association between  NAT2  polymorphisms and endometriosis susceptibility, but they reported conflicting results ( Baranova  et al ., 1999 ;  Nakago  et al ., 2001 ;  Iizuka  et al ., 2003 ;  Ivashchenko  et al ., 2003 ;  Babu  et al ., 2004 ;  Deguchi  et al ., 2005 ;  Iskhakova, 2006 ). One study investigated  NAT1  polymorphisms and found no association with endometriosis susceptibility ( Deguchi  et al ., 2005 ).\nThe arylhydrocarbon receptor (AhR) and the AhR nuclear translocator (ARNT) are transcription factors that promote the expression of a number of genes encoding metabolic enzymes (including  CYP1A1  and  GST ). The action of AhR is suppressed by the AhR repressor (AhRR). In Japanese women, the p.A185P polymorphism in the  AHRR  gene has been shown to confer endometriosis susceptibility and severity, but polymorphisms in the  AHR  and  ARNT  genes did not have an effect ( Tsuchiya  et al ., 2005a ). In a Korean study, concomitant carriage of the p.A185P polymorphism in the  AHRR  gene and the  GSTT1  null deletion, but not carriage of  AHRR  p.A185P,  GSTT1  null deletion or  GSTM1  null deletion alone, was associated with endometriosis ( Kim  et al ., 2007b ). The  AHRR  p.A185P polymorphism was not associated with endometriosis in Japanese women ( Watanabe  et al ., 2001 ).\nThe most solid evidence so far linking specific polymorphisms to endometriosis comes from studies investigating phase II detoxification enzymes, namely the  GSTT1  null deletion variant. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the  GSTM1  and  GSTT1  variants demonstrated a consistent association between  GSTT1  polymorphisms and endometriosis with a moderate effect size. There was a 29% increased risk of endometriosis in  GSTT1  null deletion carriers ( Guo, 2005 ). It has to be mentioned, however, that there was evidence of publication bias in this meta-analysis, indicating that the size of the increased risk associated with the  GSTT1  deletion variant may actually be smaller or non-existent. In addition, a number of polymorphisms have been found to be associated with endometriosis in selected populations, e.g.  HSD17B1  p.S312G and −27A/C (vIV),  CYP1A1  MspI RFLP (6235T/C),  NAT2 *5,  CYP17A1  −34T/C,  CYP19A1  TTTA repeat microsatellite and  AHRR  p.A185P (Table  III ). These associations, however, have not been independently confirmed across ethnic barriers either because only single studies are available or because other studies investigating these polymorphisms reported no association.\nPolymorphisms of genes encoding enzymes involved in metabolism and biosynthesis, which have been investigated for their role in endometriosis\nGenes are grouped alphabetically, and studies showing positive or negative associations of these genes with disease susceptibility and/or positive associations with phenotype are presented.  † Affected family members.\nEndometriosis shows some of the characteristics typically seen in malignant cells, such as neovascularization and local invasion ( Hsieh  et al ., 2005c ). Therefore, polymorphisms in a number of genes involved in vascular and cellular growth and reorganization have been investigated for a possible role in endometriosis.\nVascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) mediates vascular permeability and angiogenesis, and is known to be a key molecule in the pathogenesis of endometriosis ( Bhanoori  et al ., 2005a ;  Kim  et al ., 2005a ). Three polymorphisms in the  VEGF  gene have been evaluated in women with endometriosis. The 405G/C polymorphism has been linked to endometriosis susceptibility in South Indian women, and with susceptibility to advanced-stage endometriosis in Korean women ( Bhanoori  et al ., 2005a ;  Kim  et al ., 2005a ). In contrast, the −460C/T polymorphism did not appear to affect susceptibility in either of these populations ( Bhanoori  et al ., 2005a ;  Kim  et al ., 2005a ), but may influence the risk of endometriosis in Taiwanese women ( Hsieh  et al ., 2004d ). The  VEGF  936C/T polymorphism and the endostatin 4349G/A polymorphism were not associated with endometriosis in Korean women ( Kim  et al ., 2007a ) (Table  IV ). The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is another molecule involved in angiogenesis, and the  EGFR  2073*T allele has been linked to an increased risk of endometriosis in Taiwanese women ( Hsieh  et al ., 2005e ) (Table  I ).\nPolymorphisms encoding genes involved in glucose homeostasis, vascular function and tissue remodelling, which have been investigated for their role in endometriosis\nGenes are grouped according to their function and then alphabetically, and studies showing positive or negative associations of these genes with disease susceptibility and/or positive associations with phenotype are presented.\nAngiotensin-I-converting enzyme (ACE) catalyzes the conversion of angiotensin I to angiotensin II, a potent vasoconstrictor. Three polymorphisms in the gene encoding this enzyme have been investigated in Taiwanese women with endometriosis, and both the 2350A/G and −240A/T variants as well as the insertion/deletion (I/D) polymorphism are associated with endometriosis susceptibility in this population ( Hsieh  et al ., 2005a ,  2007a ).\nMatrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are thought to be involved in the tissue invasion that occurs during endometriotic lesion formation ( Ferrari  et al ., 2006 ). Polymorphisms in  MMP1 ,  MMP3 ,  MMP7  and  MMP9  genes have been investigated in Chinese women with endometriosis. A single I/D polymorphism 1G/2G (also referred to as −1607ins/delG) in the promoter region of the  MMP1  gene and the −181A/G polymorphism in the  MMP7  gene were associated with an increased risk of endometriosis ( Kang  et al ., 2005 ;  Shan  et al ., 2006 ). In contrast, a single I/D polymorphism −1171ins/delA (5A/6A) in the promoter region of the  MMP3  gene did not appear to affect endometriosis susceptibility ( Kang  et al ., 2005 ;  Shan  et al ., 2005 ). The  MMP1(2G)/MMP3(6A)  combination showed an association ( Kang  et al ., 2005 ;  Shan  et al ., 2005 ), but this is probably due to the effects of the  MMP1  (2G) genotype rather than a combined effect of both genes. The −1562C/T polymorphism in the  MMP9  gene was not associated with endometriosis susceptibility ( Shan  et al ., 2006 ). A group that investigated MMP polymorphisms in a population of Italian women found no association between  MMP1  or  MMP3  gene polymorphisms and susceptibility to endometriosis ( Ferrari  et al ., 2006 ).\nα2-HS glycoprotein (AHSG) has been implicated in tissue development, and polymorphisms in the  AHSG  gene (p.T230M and p.T238S) have been linked to endometriosis susceptibility in Korean women ( Kim  et al ., 2004 ). The plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI-1) 4G/5G promoter polymorphism has been investigated in 75 women with laparoscopically confirmed endometriosis and 43 controls ( Bedaiwy  et al ., 2006 ). In this study, the 4G/4G genotype, known to be associated with hypofibrinolysis, was found to be over-represented among women with endometriosis.\nNo consistent evidence linking specific polymorphisms of genes endoding proteins involved in vascular function and tissue remodelling with endometriosis is available. A number of polymorphisms have been found to be associated with endometriosis in selected populations (Table  IV ). These associations, however, have not been independently confirmed across ethnic barriers either because only single studies are available or because other studies investigating these polymorphisms reported no association. No meta-analysis of respective studies has been published. Therefore, no specific polymorphisms of genes encoding proteins involved in vascular function and tissue remodelling have been convincingly shown to play a role in the susceptibility to endometriosis.\nGenes involved in signal transduction ( STAT6 , Table  IV ), malignant transformation ( TP53 ,  P21 ,  KRAS , Table  IV ;  BRAF ), apoptosis ( FAS , Table  I ;  FASLG , Table  I ) and galactose metabolism ( GAL T ,Table  IV ) have been investigated for a role in endometriosis susceptibility, but no consistent association has been found (Tables  I – IV ) ( Cramer  et al ., 1996 ;  Morland  et al ., 1998 ;  Hadfield  et al ., 1999 ;  Hsieh  et al ., 2001c ;  Stefansson  et al ., 2001 ;  Chang  et al ., 2002 ;  Lattuada  et al ., 2004b ;  Omori  et al ., 2004 ;  Fernandez  et al ., 2005 ;  He  et al ., 2006 ;  Hsieh and Lin, 2006 ;  Zhao  et al ., 2006 ;  Bhanoori  et al ., 2007 ;  Vietri  et al ., 2007 ). Two exceptions are the  STAT6  3′-UTR 2964G/A polymorphism ( Bhanoori  et al ., 2007 ) and the  GALT  p.N314D polymorphism ( Cramer  et al ., 1996 ), which are over-represented among South Indian women and US women with endometriosis, respectively.  Hsieh and Lin (2006)  found that the  TP53  codon p.R72P polymorphism was associated with endometriosis in Taiwanese women and also looked for the presence of mutations at codons 11 and 248 in this population, but did not find any (Table  I ). An Australian study of 22 polymorphisms in the  EMX2  gene and 15 polymorphisms in the  PTEN  gene found no association with endometriosis ( Treloar  et al ., 2007 ).\nNo consistent and independently confirmed evidence linking specific polymorphisms of the  STAT6, TP53, P21, FAS, FASLG, EMX2, PTEN, CTLA4  and  GALT  genes is available.\n\nIn this review, we have summarized the current evidence linking genetic polymorphisms and endometriosis, showing that the majority of polymorphisms investigated so far are not associated with this disease in a methodologically reliable way. This may be because they have been investigated in only a single study or a limited number of studies, or because conflicting results were obtained.\nThe most solid evidence to date linking specific polymorphisms to endometriosis comes from studies investigating phase II detoxification enzymes. A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies investigating the glutathione- S -transferases  GSTM1  and  GSTT1  variants demonstrated a consistent association of a  GSTT1  polymorphism and endometriosis, with a 29% increased risk of endometriosis in  GSTT1  null deletion carriers.\nThere is no consistent evidence to link specific polymorphisms of genes encoding inflammatory mediators and proteins involved in sex steroid metabolism, vascular function and tissue remodelling with endometriosis. Although a number of polymorphisms have been found associated with endometriosis in selected populations, these associations have not been independently confirmed across ethnic barriers, either because only single studies are available or because other studies reported no association. The majority of polymorphisms have not been subjected to meta-analysis due to the limited availability of comparable studies. However, a systematic review and meta-analysis of sex steroid biosynthesis and sex steroid receptors demonstrated no consistent association of the investigated polymorphisms with endometriosis.\nClearly, absence of evidence of an association between a specific polymorphism and endometriosis does not rule out that this gene in general or other polymorphisms of this gene in particular may be involved in the etiology of this disease.\nTo date, most studies are retrospective genetic association studies, whereas others are studies with prospectively identified cases. This is a potential source of inconsistency, since studies including prospectively identified cases, i.e. incident cases, may produce different results compared with studies using retrospectively identified cases, i.e. prevalent cases. Other problems facing researchers in this field are well-illustrated in two recent reviews on the genetics of endometriosis ( Guo, 2006a ,  b ). The author ruled out many of the previous positive findings, highlighting issues such as lack of independent confirmation for many studies ( Guo, 2006b ) and faulty analyses ( Guo, 2006a ).\nIn order to further explore the importance of known and new polymorphisms in female reproductive function, it is essential that studies are well-designed and sufficiently powered. Whereas retrospective studies are useful for generating hypotheses, a prospective design must be used to test these hypotheses. Exploratory (hypothesis-generating) studies should aim to screen large numbers of genetic variations. This becomes an option for more researchers as high-throughput genotyping technologies improve and become more widely accessible. The exploratory phase should be followed by validation of a limited number of candidate markers (hypothesis testing), and prospective studies should be conducted whenever an association is confirmed. This approach will allow the identification and validation of polymorphisms, and those with strong links to susceptibility may help in developing new drugs or regimens. In addition, the discovery of genes that influence treatment response may enable individualized treatment to be tailored on the basis of genotype.\n\nThe preparation of this manuscript was sponsored by an unrestricted educational grant from  Merck Serono , Geneva, Switzerland.","source_license":"CC0","license_restricted":false}