{"paper_id":"1822a6a4-4d73-4454-955e-126155bb666c","body_text":"This was a semi-empirical clinical trial with cross-sectional method. It was a three-step research in which 30 patients were enrolled according to inclusion criteria. They were women between the ages of 15 to 49 years suffering from dysmenorrhea and there was no other diagnosed reason for their illness but symptomatic endometriosis diagnosed via laparoscopy or laparotomy. The visual analog scale (VAS) 21  was used to measure the severity of pain and McGill questionnaires for personal/fertility information were used to collect other data.\nAfter reviewing the patients’ files and observing the registered diagnosis of endometriosis, they were invited to the Infertility Center to receive the complete explanation of the research. Among the participants in the first session, those who willed to take part in the study were interviewed to complete the questionnaires. This initial invitation went on several times for the 30 patients to be picked using a simple method. The researcher was not in any way biased in picking the patients, since the limited number of patients was a major factor in picking the ones who wished to participate. Thus the number of chosen sample units was more than the calculated number so that if anyone declared unwillingness to continue working and left the study, the researcher would not face a shortage in samples.\nThe questionnaire was completed once before the beginning and twice after the end of the intervention (once immediately after the first post-intervention menstruation and once six weeks after that). The intervention consisted of 20 twenty-minute sessions of massage on some specific points of abdomen, sides, and the back (sacrum) of patients. The researcher did the massage after a few minutes when the patient had drifted off to make her relax. To do this, hands were drenched in oil and massaged the patient’s abdomen, sides, and back.\nThe researcher had been trained for twenty sessions to correctly utilize the massage skills. After being approved for her massage skills (finding the specific points, massage duration, and the pressure on each point) and receiving the certificate, the researcher performed the first step during which the required observations were made to secure the process. The massage therapy technique consisted of pressuring 24 specific point of abdomen and 10 points on the sacrum each one for two minutes while hands keep moving on the abdomen, sides, and sacrum.\nThe Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was used to validate the questionnaire. The questionnaire was confirmed with a Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 0.7.\nThe data was analyzed by descriptive and inferential statistical methods (Wilcoxon signedrank test). The VAS measured data were compared by Friedman test. The Wilcoxon signedrank test was used to compare data too. Statistical analysis was done by SPSS software.\n\nConsidering the loss of sample units due to their unwillingness to continue participating in the study the number dropped from a total 30 (which was more than the calculated number) to 23. The sample units were all of ages 21-40 years, the majority of whom were 26-30 years old and the average age was 28.2 ± 4.2 years. Most of the patients had a normal body mass index (BMI) around 22.96 ± 3.59 kg/m 2 . 69.6 percent of the patients felt dysmenorrhea after and during their menstruation and 60.9 percent of them took analgesics before the study.\nThe highest frequency of menstrual pain before the beginning of the intervention was that of “severe pain” (52.3 percent); while the highest frequency of menstrual pain for “no pain” was that of immediately after the intervention and six weeks after the intervention (34.8 and 65.2 percent respectively). The Friedman test showed that the severity of pain was significantly in three studied times (p < 0.001). The Wilcoxon test also showed that the severity of pain during those three times have a significant difference (p < 0.001) with each other. Also the severity of the pain before intervention had a significant difference (p < 0.001) with that after it and this difference persisted after six weeks (p < 0.001). In addition, the severity of pain immediately after the end of intervention shows a significant difference from that of after six weeks (p = 0.001). The t-test showed a significant difference between before the intervention and immediately it (t = 7.831; p < 0.001) and also between before the intervention and six weeks after (t = 9.755; p < 0.001) ( Table 1 ).\nFrequency of menstrual pain score (VAS) of units under study in three different periods of the research\n\nThe findings of this research showed that the effects of the massage therapy are more at six weeks after it, when the body has adjusted itself to the new conditions. Wurn et al concerning the reduction of the pelvis pains and the pain during the intercourse stated that body needs two weeks time after therapy to adjust to the changes. 19\nIn all the previous studies on the effects of massages on pelvis pains, such as the menstrual pain and the pain during intercourse, the effects of massage have been evaluated only before and six weeks after the intervention; but in this study, we evaluated this effect immediately after the intervention too, in order to be able to evaluate the speed of intervention’s effectiveness. The findings showed a significant change in the level of pain immediately after the intervention, while the effects of massage increased six weeks after the intervention and the level of analgesia reached 65.2% (six weeks after the intervention) from 34.8% (immediately after the intervention) and none of the patients has experienced severe pain after the intervention. Wurn et al studied the menstrual pain caused by endometriosis after massage during the three phases of ovulation, before menstruation, and during menstruation and observed significant reduction in the menstrual pain in all three phases (p = 0.014). 20\nEbrahim zadeh, also examined the effects of acupressure on 216 teenage girls suffering from dysmenorrhea. He found that the severity of dysmenorrhea after the acupressure therapy decreased significantly (p < 0.001). 17\n\nAccording to the findings of this study, it can be stated that massage therapy can result in reducing the menstrual pain caused by endometriosis. Massage therapy can also be used as an inexpensive therapy in medicine and an alternative to reduce the pain in patients suffering from endometriosis. It can also be considered as a complementary therapy with no side effects. Thus, by teaching these techniques to the midwifery groups we can improve women’s health and develop the skills of this profession. By improving women’s health, their positive role in the society would become clearer, their sense of capability would be strengthened, and they would be more effective in taking care of the family health.\nIn this study, the standard of the research was having menstrual pain regardless of the endometriosis level of the patients, it is suggested that in the future studies, endometriosis level be considered as a variable.\nThe authors declare no conflict of interest in this study.","source_license":"CC0","license_restricted":false}