{"paper_id":"0e9a11fa-ce06-4f25-bf90-9f695d136137","body_text":"Reproductive Surgery\nBuy print or eBook\n[Opens in a new window] The Society for Reproductive Surgeons' Manual\n- Reproductive Surgery\n- Reproductive Surgery\n- Copyright page\n- Contents\n- Videos\n- Contributors\n- Foreword\n- Preface\n- Chapter 1 Hysteroscopy: Office and Operative – Myomectomy, Polypectomy, and Adhesiolysis\n- Chapter 2 Adhesions in Reproductive Surgery: Treatment and Prevention\n- Chapter 3 Müllerian Anomalies\n- Chapter 4 Ovarian Surgery with a Focus on Reproduction\n- Chapter 5 Surgical Management of Proximal and Distal Tubal Disease\n- Chapter 6 Tubal Anastomosis for Reversal of Tubal Ligation\n- Chapter 7 Surgical Management of Ectopic Pregnancy\n- Chapter 8 Surgical Management of Uterine Myomas\n- Chapter 9 Laparoscopic Surgery for the Management of Endometriosis\n- Chapter 10 Female Fertility Preservation Surgery\n- Chapter 11 The Role of Robotics in Reproductive Surgery\n- Chapter 12 Vasectomy Reversal\n- Chapter 13 Varicocele Repair\n- Chapter 14 Surgical Sperm Retrieval Methods\n- Chapter 15 Surgical Management of Ejaculatory Duct Obstruction for Male Infertility\n- Chapter 16 Fertility Considerations in Scrotal Surgery\n- Index\n- References\nPublished online by Cambridge University Press: 02 November 2018\nBook contents\n- Reproductive Surgery\n- Reproductive Surgery\n- Copyright page\n- Contents\n- Videos\n- Contributors\n- Foreword\n- Preface\n- Chapter 1 Hysteroscopy: Office and Operative – Myomectomy, Polypectomy, and Adhesiolysis\n- Chapter 2 Adhesions in Reproductive Surgery: Treatment and Prevention\n- Chapter 3 Müllerian Anomalies\n- Chapter 4 Ovarian Surgery with a Focus on Reproduction\n- Chapter 5 Surgical Management of Proximal and Distal Tubal Disease\n- Chapter 6 Tubal Anastomosis for Reversal of Tubal Ligation\n- Chapter 7 Surgical Management of Ectopic Pregnancy\n- Chapter 8 Surgical Management of Uterine Myomas\n- Chapter 9 Laparoscopic Surgery for the Management of Endometriosis\n- Chapter 10 Female Fertility Preservation Surgery\n- Chapter 11 The Role of Robotics in Reproductive Surgery\n- Chapter 12 Vasectomy Reversal\n- Chapter 13 Varicocele Repair\n- Chapter 14 Surgical Sperm Retrieval Methods\n- Chapter 15 Surgical Management of Ejaculatory Duct Obstruction for Male Infertility\n- Chapter 16 Fertility Considerations in Scrotal Surgery\n- Index\n- References\n- Type\n- Chapter\n- Information\n- Reproductive SurgeryThe Society for Reproductive Surgeons' Manual, pp. 33 - 42Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018\nLegendre, G, Catala, L, Morinière, C, et al. Relationship between ovarian cysts and infertility: what surgery and when? Fertil Steril. 2014;101(3):608–14.10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.01.021CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\nAmerican College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin. Management of adnexal masses. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110(1):201–14.Google Scholar\nRoyal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, British Society of Gynaecologic Endoscopists. Management of suspected ovarian masses in premenopausal women. RCOG Green-Top Guideline; 2011:62. www.rcog.org.uk/en/guidelines-research-services/guidelines/gtg62/ (accessed on October 12, 2016).Google Scholar\nPadilla, LA, Radosevich, DM, Milad, MP. Accuracy of the pelvic examination in detecting adnexal masses. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;96(4):593–8.Google ScholarPubMed\nAmerican College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Practice Bulletin. Evaluation and management of adnexal masses. Number 174, November 2016.Google Scholar\nVan Holsbeke, C, Van Calster, B, Guerriero, S, et al. Endometriomas: their ultrasound characteristics. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010;35(6):730–40.10.1002/uog.7668CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\nPatel, MD, Feldstein, VA, Lipson, SD, Chen, DC, Filly, RA. Cystic teratomas of the ovary: diagnostic value of sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998;171(4):1061–5.10.2214/ajr.171.4.9762997CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\nTheodoridis, TD, Zepiridis, L, Mikos, T, et al. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound with laparoscopy in the management of patients with adnexal masses. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009;280(5):767–73.10.1007/s00404-009-1001-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\nIm, SS, Gordon, AN, Buttin, BM, et al. Validation of referral guidelines for women with pelvic masses. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105(1):35–41.10.1097/01.AOG.0000149159.69560.efCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\nMacKenna, A, Fabres, C, Alam, V, Morales, V. Clinical management of functional ovarian cysts: a prospective and randomized study. Hum Reprod. 2000;15(12):2567–9.10.1093/humrep/15.12.2567CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\nGrimes, DA, Jones, LB, Lopez, LM, Schulz, KF. Oral contraceptives for functional ovarian cysts. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(4):CD006134.Google ScholarPubMed\nHart, RJ, Hickey, M, Maouris, P, Buckett, W. Excisional surgery versus ablative surgery for ovarian endometriomata. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;(2):CD004992.Google ScholarPubMed\nPsaroudakis, D, Hirsch, M, Davis, C. Review of the management of ovarian endometriosis: paradigm shift towards conservative approaches. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2014;26(4):266–74.10.1097/GCO.0000000000000078CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\nDan, H, Limin, F. Laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy versus fenestration/coagulation or laser vaporization for the treatment of endometriomas: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2013;76:75–82.10.1159/000351165CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\nKobayashi, H, Kajihara, H, Yamada, Y, et al. Risk of carcinoma in women with ovarian endometrioma. Front Biosci. 2011;3:529–39.Google ScholarPubMed\nKalampokas, T, Kamath, MS, Kalampokaset, E. AMH after laparoscopic surgery of the ovaries: a review. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2013;29:408–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\nIwase, A, Nakamura, T, Nakahara, T, Goto, M, Kikkawa, F. Assessment of ovarian reserve using anti-Müllerian hormone levels in benign gynecologic conditions and surgical interventions: a systematic narrative review. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2014 ;12:125.10.1186/1477-7827-12-125CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\nChang, HJ, Han, SH, Lee, JR, et al. Impact of laparoscopic cystectomy on ovarian reserve: serial changes of serum anti-Müllerian hormone levels. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:343–9.10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.02.022CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\nChen, Y, Pei, H, Chang, Y, et al. The impact of endometrioma and laparoscopic cystectomy on ovarian reserve and the exploration of related factors assessed by serum anti-Mullerian hormone: a prospective cohort study. J Ovarian Res. 2014 ;7:108.10.1186/s13048-014-0108-0CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\nKuroda, M, Kuroda, K, Arakawa, A, et al. Histological assessment of impact of ovarian endometrioma and laparoscopic cystectomy on ovarian reserve. Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2012;38:1187–93.10.1111/j.1447-0756.2012.01845.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\nGoodman, LR, Goldberg, JM, Flyckt, RL, et al. Effect of surgery on ovarian reserve in women with endometriomas, endometriosis and controls. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215:589.e1–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\nSomigliana, E, Benaglia, L, Paffoni, A, Busnelli, A, Vigano, P, Vercellini, P. Risks of conservative management in women with ovarian endometriomas undergoing IVF. Hum Reprod Update. 2015;21:486–99.10.1093/humupd/dmv012CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\nBenschop, L, Farquhar, C, van der Poel, N, Heineman, MJ. Interventions for women with endometrioma prior to assisted reproductive technology (Review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;CD008571.Google Scholar\nPractice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Endometriosis and infertility: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2012;98:591–8.Google Scholar\nTsoumpou, I, Kyrgiou, M, Gelbaya, TA, Nardo, LG. The effect of surgical treatment for endometrioma on in vitro fertilization outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2009;92:75–87.10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.05.049CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\nKeckstein, J, Ulrich, U, Sasse, V, Roth, A, Tuttlies, F, Karageorgieva, E. Reduction of postoperative adhesion formation after laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy. Hum Reprod. 1996;11:579–82.10.1093/HUMREP/11.3.579CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\nUncu, G, Kasapoglu, I, Ozerkan, K, Seyhan, A, Oral Yilmaztepe, A, Ata, B. Prospective assessment of the impact of endometriomas and their removal on ovarian reserve and determinants of the rate of decline in ovarian reserve. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(8):2140–5.10.1093/humrep/det123CrossRefGoogle Scholar\nBenaglia, L, Candotti, G, Busnelli, A, Paffoni, A, Vercellini, P, Somigliana, E. Antral follicle count as a predictor of ovarian responsiveness in women with endometriomas or with a history of surgery for endometriomas. Fertil Steril. 2015;103(6):1544–50.e1–3.10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.03.013CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\nJang, WK, Lim, SY, Park, JC, Lee, KR, Lee, A, Rhee, JH. Surgical impact on serum anti-Müllerian hormone in women with benign ovarian cyst: a prospective study. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2014;57(2):121–7.10.5468/ogs.2014.57.2.121CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\nCagnacci, A, Bellafronte, M, Xholli, A, et al. Impact of laparoscopic cystectomy of endometriotic and non-endometriotic cysts on ovarian volume, antral follicle count (AFC) and ovarian doppler velocimetry. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2016;32(4):298–301.10.3109/09513590.2016.1142523CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\nMohamed, AA, Al-Hussaini, TK, Fathalla, MM, El Shamy, TT, Abdelaal, II, Amer, SA. The impact of excision of benign nonendometriotic ovarian cysts on ovarian reserve: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215(2):169–76.10.1016/j.ajog.2016.03.045CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\nRaffi, F, Metwally, M, Amer, S. The impact of excision of ovarian endometrioma on ovarian reserve: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97(9):3146–54.10.1210/jc.2012-1558CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\nPergialiotis, V, Prodromidou, A, Frountzas, M, Bitos, K, Perrea, D, Doumouchtsis, SK. The effect of bipolar electrocoagulation during ovarian cystectomy on ovarian reserve: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213(5):620–8.10.1016/j.ajog.2015.04.006CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\nAta, B, Turkgeldi, E, Seyhan, A, Urman, B. Effect of hemostatic method on ovarian reserve following laparoscopic endometrioma excision: comparison of suture, hemostatic sealant, and bipolar dessication. A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015;22(3):363–72.10.1016/j.jmig.2014.12.168CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\nSpinelli, C, Piscioneri, J, Strambi, S. Adnexal torsion in adolescents: update and review of the literature. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2015;27(5):320–5.10.1097/GCO.0000000000000197CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\nSasaki, KJ, Miller, CE. Adnexal torsion: review of the literature. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014;21(2):196–202.10.1016/j.jmig.2013.09.010CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\nHuchon, C, Staraci, S, Fauconnier, A. Adnexal torsion: a predictive score for pre-operative diagnosis. Hum Reprod. 2010;25(9):2276–80.10.1093/humrep/deq173CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\nHuchon, C, Fauconnier, A. Adnexal torsion: a literature review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010;150(1):8–12.10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.02.006CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\nGaner Herman, H, Shalev, A, Ginat, S, Kerner, R, Keidar, R, Bar, J, Sagiv, R. Clinical characteristics of adnexal torsion in premenarchal patients. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016;293(3):603–8.10.1007/s00404-015-3840-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\nGinath, S, Shalev, A, Keidar, R, et al. Differences between adnexal torsion in pregnant and nonpregnant women. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2012;19(6):708–14.10.1016/j.jmig.2012.07.007CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\nMcWilliams, GD, Hill, MJ, Dietrich, CS 3rd. Gynecologic emergencies. Surg Clin North Am. 2008;88(2):265–83.10.1016/j.suc.2007.12.007CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\nShadinger, LL, Andreotti, RF, Kurian, RL. Preoperative sonographic and clinical characteristics as predictors of ovarian torsion. J Ultrasound Med. 2008;27(1):7–13.10.7863/jum.2008.27.1.7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\nMashiach, R, Melamed, N, Gilad, N, Ben-Shitrit, G, Meizner, I. Sonographic diagnosis of ovarian torsion: accuracy and predictive factors. J Ultrasound Med. 2011;30(9):1205–10.10.7863/jum.2011.30.9.1205CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\nRha, SE, Byun, JY, Jung, SE, et al. CT and MR imaging features of adnexal torsion. Radiographics. 2002;22(2):283–94.10.1148/radiographics.22.2.g02mr02283CrossRefGoogle Scholar\nCohen, SB, Wattiez, A, Seidman, DS, et al. Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for detorsion and sparing of twisted ischemic adnexa. JSLS. 2003;7(4):295–9.Google ScholarPubMed\nMcGovern, PG, Noah, R, Koenigsberg, R, Little, AB. Adnexal torsion and pulmonary embolism: case report and review of the literature. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1999;54(9):601–8.10.1097/00006254-199909000-00025CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\nShalev, E, Bustan, M, Yarom, I, Peleg, D. Recovery of ovarian function after laparoscopic detorsion. Hum Reprod. 1995;10(11):2965–6.10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a135830CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\nPansky, M, Smorgick, N, Herman, A, Schneider, D, Halperin, R. Torsion of normal adnexa in postmenarchal women and risk of recurrence. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109(2 Pt 1):355–9.10.1097/01.AOG.0000250969.15438.17CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\nCelik, A, Ergün, O, Aldemir, H, et al. Long-term results of conservative management of adnexal torsion in children. J Pediatr Surg. 2005;40(4):704–8.10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2005.01.008CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\nGeimanaite, L, Trainavicius, K. Ovarian torsion in children: management and outcomes. J Pediatr Surg. 2013;48(9):1946–53.10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2013.04.026CrossRefGoogle Scholar\nLacher, M, Kuebler, JF, Yannam, GR, et al. Single-incision pediatric endosurgery for ovarian pathology. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2013;23(3):291–6.10.1089/lap.2012.0380CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\nOelsner, G, Cohen, SB, Soriano, D, Admon, D, Mashiach, S, Carp, H. Minimal surgery for the twisted ischaemic adnexa can preserve ovarian function. Hum Reprod. 2003;18(12):2599–602.10.1093/humrep/deg498CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\nOelsner, G, Bider, D, Goldenberg, M, Admon, D, Mashiach, S. Long-term follow-up of the twisted ischemic adnexa managed by detorsion. Fertil Steril. 1993;60(6):976–9.10.1016/S0015-0282(16)56395-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar\nDonesky, BW, Adashi, EY. Surgically induced ovulation in the polycystic ovary syndrome: wedge resection revisited in the age of laparoscopy. Fertil Steril. 1995;63:439–63.Google ScholarPubMed\nGjönnaess, H. Polycystic ovarian syndrome treated by ovarian electrocautery through the laparoscope. Fertil Steril. 1984;41:20–5.10.1016/S0015-0282(16)47534-5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\nSeow, KM, Juan, CC, Hwang, JL, Ho, LT. Laparoscopic surgery in polycystic ovary syndrome: reproductive and metabolic effects. Semin Reprod Med. 2008;26:101–110.10.1055/s-2007-992930CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\nFernandez, H, Morin-Surruca, M, Torre, A, Faivre, E, Deffieux, X, Gervaise, A. Ovarian drilling for surgical treatment of polycystic ovarian syndrome: a comprehensive review. Reprod Biomed Online. 2011;22:556–68.10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.03.013CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\nAmer, SAK, Li, TC, Cooke, ID. A prospective dose-finding study of the amount of thermal energy required for laparoscopic ovarian diathermy. Hum Reprod. 2003;18:1693–8.10.1093/humrep/deg307CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\nDabirashrafi, H. Complications of laparoscopic ovarian cauterization. Fertil Steril. 1989;52:878–9Google ScholarPubMed\nArmar, NA, McGarrigle, HHG, Honour, J, Holownia, P, Jacobs, HS, Lachelin, GCL. Laparoscopic ovarian diathermy in the management of anovulatory infertility in women with polycystic ovaries:endocrine changes and clinical outcome. Fertil Steril. 1990;53:45–9.10.1016/S0015-0282(16)53214-2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\nGurgan, T, Urman, B, Aksu, T, Yarali, H, Develioglu, O, Kisnisci, HA. The effect of short-interval laparoscopic lysis of adhesions on pregnancy rates following Nd-YAG laser photocoagulation of polycystic ovaries. Obstet Gynecol. 1992;80:45–7.Google ScholarPubMed\nGreenblatt, EM, Casper, RF. Adhesion formation after laparoscopic ovarian cautery for polycystic ovarian syndrome: lack of correlation with pregnancy rates. Fertil Steril. 1993;60:766–70.10.1016/S0015-0282(16)56273-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar\nMercorio, F, Mercorio, A, Di Spiezio Sardo, A, Barba, GV, Pellicano, M, Nappi, C. Evaluation of ovarian adhesion formation after laparoscopic ovarian drilling by second look minilaparoscopy. Fertil Steril. 2008;89:1229–33.10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.05.009CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\nApi, M. Is ovarian reserve diminished after laparoscopic ovarian drilling? Gynecol Endocrinol. 2009;25:159–6510.1080/09513590802585605CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\nCampo, S. Ovulatory cycles, pregnancy outcomes and complications after surgical treatment of polycystic ovary syndrome. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1998;53:297–308.10.1097/00006254-199805000-00022CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\nThe Thessaloniki ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored PCOS Consensus Workshop Group. Consensus on infertility treatment related to polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2008;89:505–22.Google Scholar\nFarquhar, C, Brown, J, Marjoribanks, J. Laparoscopic drilling by diathermy or laser for ovulation induction in anovulatory polycystic ovary syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 ;6. Art. No:CD001122.10.1002/14651858.CD001122.pub4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\nAbu Hashim, H, El Lakany, N, Sherief, L. Combined metformin and clomiphene citrate versus laparoscopic ovarian diathermy for ovulation induction in clomiphene-resistant women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2011;37:169–77.10.1111/j.1447-0756.2010.01383.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\nAbu Hashim, H, Foda, O, Ghayaty, E. Combined metformin-clomiphene in clomiphene resistant polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015;94:921–30.10.1111/aogs.12673CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed\nAccessibility compliance for the HTML of this chapter is currently unknown\nand may be updated in the future.\nTo save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.\nNote you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.\nFind out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.\n- Ovarian Surgery with a Focus on Reproduction\n-\n- Book: Reproductive Surgery\n- Online publication: 02 November 2018\nTo save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.\n- Ovarian Surgery with a Focus on Reproduction\n-\n- Book: Reproductive Surgery\n- Online publication: 02 November 2018\nTo save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.\n- Ovarian Surgery with a Focus on Reproduction\n-\n- Book: Reproductive Surgery\n- Online publication: 02 November 2018","source_license":"CC0","license_restricted":false}