{"paper_id":"0c57811d-9c1d-4f7a-9d83-03c205d8dcee","body_text":"Keywords\nEndometriosis, holistic treatment for endometriosis, complementary treatment for endometriosis, chronic pelvic pain\nALL Metrics\n-\nViews\nDownloads\nHow to cite this article\nDesai J, Strong S and Ball E. Holistic approaches to living well with endometriosis [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]. F1000Research 2024, 13:359 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.142586.1) NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.\nExport Citation\nSciwheel\nEndNote\nRef. Manager\nBibtex\nProCite\nSente\nSelect a format first\n▬\n✚\nReview\n[version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]\n* Equal contributors\nPUBLISHED 23 Apr 2024\nAuthor details Author details\n1 Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust, London, England, UK\n2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, E1 1FR, UK\n3 Centre for Maternal & Child Health Research, School of Health Sciences, City University of London, UK\n2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, E1 1FR, UK\n3 Centre for Maternal & Child Health Research, School of Health Sciences, City University of London, UK\nJessica Desai\nRoles: Data Curation, Writing – Original Draft Preparation\nRoles: Data Curation, Writing – Original Draft Preparation\nSophie Strong\nRoles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Supervision, Writing – Original Draft Preparation\nRoles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Supervision, Writing – Original Draft Preparation\nElizabeth Ball\nRoles: Conceptualization, Methodology, Resources, Supervision, Writing – Review & Editing\nRoles: Conceptualization, Methodology, Resources, Supervision, Writing – Review & Editing\nOPEN PEER REVIEW\nREVIEWER STATUS\nThis article is included in the Endometriosis collection.\nEndometriosis is a common chronic condition for which there is currently no cure. Those suffering from endometriosis-related pelvic pain (ERPP) may struggle with side effects and/or risks presented by conventional medical and surgical treatment strategies, or not get pain relief. Increasing numbers of endometriosis patients wish to explore holistic management with fewer side effects, however it is important that medical professionals maintain an evidence-based practice for recommended treatments. We present up-to-date evidence of holistic strategies used for managing ERPP including nutritional strategies, body and mind therapies, acupuncture, traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) and the use of adjunct devices such as phallus length reducers and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS).\nNutrition: Gluten-free, low-nickel and high intake of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids diets improve ERPP. Low FODMAP (fermentable oligo-, di-, monosaccharides and polyols) is helpful in those with concurrent irritable bowel syndrome. Body and mind: Cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) is particularly beneficial in postoperative pain reduction, whilst mindfulness has been shown to reduce pain scores and dyschezia. Progressive muscle relaxation therapy and regular yoga sessions improve ERPP and Quality of life.\nAcupuncture: 15 randomised control trials assessing acupuncture and moxibustion show improved pain scores when compared to those receiving conventional therapies alone. Adjunct devices: TENS improves deep dyspareunia and lessens the number of days pain is experienced.\nHolistic management strategies for ERPP should be incorporated into routine counselling when discussing conservative, medical and or surgical treatments for endometriosis. The growing evidence presented for the use of holistic management strategies gives hope to those patients who cannot have, or don’t respond to conventional approaches and as an adjunct alongside standard treatments.\nEndometriosis, holistic treatment for endometriosis, complementary treatment for endometriosis, chronic pelvic pain\nCorresponding Author(s)\nSophie Strong ([email protected])\nGrant information: This study was supported by the Centre for Maternal & Child Health Research, School of Health Sciences, City University of London.\nThe funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.\nCopyright: © 2024 Desai J et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. How to cite: Desai J, Strong S and Ball E. Holistic approaches to living well with endometriosis [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]. F1000Research 2024, 13:359 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.142586.1) First published: 23 Apr 2024, 13:359 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.142586.1) Latest published: 08 Nov 2024, 13:359 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.142586.2) The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.\nThere is a newer version\nof this article available.\nof this article available.\nEndometriosis, an inflammatory women’s health condition affecting about 10% of the female population,1 can cause infertility and chronic pelvic pain (CPP) with acute flares. Pain centralisation is thought to play a role for many patients.2 The mainstay of treatment has been laparoscopic excision or ablation of implants/affected organs. Hormonal or non-hormonal medical therapies can replace or complement this, along with pain relief.\nHowever, in our experience at a busy tertiary endometriosis centre in London, many women with endometriosis-related pelvic pain (ERPP) have adopted holistic approaches to manage pain and improve their quality of life (QOL). Recent developments also call us to reassess and contextualise traditional treatments, to look further afield for more comprehensive approaches, which support patient autonomy and empowerment toward living well with endometriosis.\n1. A systematic review (SR) of surgical outcomes for endometriosis3 showed that 11.8% of patients reported no pain improvement. Women with isolated surface endometriosis in particular, may not benefit from surgery,4 which is currently the focus of randomised control trial (RCT) ESPriT2 (NCT04081532).\n2. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic transformed how women seek advice on endometriosis. ‘Hormonophobia’ appears to be on the rise on social media platforms, with increasing numbers of women sharing negative experiences of hormonal contraceptives, reducing the willingness to try them.5\n3. Antidepressants and Gabapentin, previously prescribed as neuromodulators are not as effective as previously thought.6\nIn front of this backdrop and with an understanding that living with chronic conditions can be eased by holistic approaches and self-management,7 we present recent advances in this field.\nNumerous SRs support the role of nutrition in managing chronic pain conditions.8,9 Optimising diet quality with a high intake of anti-inflammatory nutrients reduces pain severity by modulating the body’s inflammatory response.10 Gut microbiome dysbiosis in inflammatory pain conditions such as endometriosis is hypothesised to cause incorrect immune responses resulting in pain from central sensitisation pathways. Probiotics and FODMAP diets (omitting fermentable oligo-, di-, monosaccharides and polyols), are beneficial in treating visceral pain.11 More research into dietary effects on endometriosis is recommended,12 as many studies to date have small population sizes with heterogeneity between intervention groups.\nA SR (one RCT and five observational studies) of low FODMAP, gluten-free and low-nickel diets as well as high intake of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (average treatment dose palmitoylethanolamide 400 mg & polydatin 40 mg twice daily for 3 months)13–15 reported that all diets, with the exception of low FODMAP reduced pain.16 Those with concurrent irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) may benefit the most from low-FODMAPs; observational data (n=160) demonstrated symptom improvement compared to patients with IBS alone (72% vs. 40%, respectively, p = 0.001).17\nCompared to controls, endometriosis patients may have a higher rate of nickel allergic contact mucositis (odds ratio: 2.474; 95% confidence interval: 1.023~5.988; p = 0.044),18 causing IBS-like symptoms. Reducing nickel-rich foods e.g. tomatoes, whole wheat, and soy, resulted in significant improvement of CPP (p < 0.05) in a prospective 3-month observational study of 31 women with endometriosis and gastrointestinal symptoms.19\nKrabbenborg et al.20 observed 157 women with endometriosis assessing which dietary modifications patients had already implemented improved their QOL using the EHP-30 score. The most used diets were the endometriosis diet (self-selecting nutrients to omit thought by the individual to worsen their symptoms), gluten free, low-FODMAP, low-lactose and weight loss diets. Although EHP-30 scores did not significantly alter with dietary modification, pain reduction was noted in 71.3% of patients, with gluten-free showing the greatest impact. Dietary modifications have a greater impact with longer adherence.\nIn a placebo-controlled triple-blind RCT (n = 120), garlic extract (400 mg daily over 12 weeks) showed a significant reduction in ERPP (p < 0.05). Purported mechanisms are reduction in oxidative stresses, prostaglandin production, endometriosis cell proliferation and increased oestrogen elimination.21\nEndometriosis severity may be associated with both low and high BMI.22 The association between BMI and endometriosis severity might be more complicated than a simple correlation. A confounding factor for both endometriosis and obesity may be systemic inflammation.23\nIt is tempting to speculate whether maintenance of a normal BMI is beneficial for symptom control, but studies designed to assess change in weight for ERPP are lacking.\nBody & mind therapies\nPoor mental health may result secondary to the multifactorial impact endometriosis has on physical, sexual, and psychological well-being.24 Strategies such as cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), yoga and relaxation techniques can be valuable. Increasing evidence suggests psychosocial factors, such as preoperative pain catastrophising independently impact pain experience, severity of symptoms and recurrence of endometriosis.25,26 Patient awareness and self-uptake of psychological approaches for ERPP are increasingly popular, with 93.8% of women sampled in a cross-sectional survey distributed via The Endometriosis Network Canada (n = 434) utilising at least one psychological management strategy.27\nCBT\nCBT is recognised as an effective treatment for chronic pain and associated mental health conditions, including CPP.28 Current research interest is evidenced by the publication of three RCT protocols assessing efficacy of CBT29,30 and yoga with CBT31 on QOL of patients with endometriosis. Boersen’s RCT30 aims to recruit 100 patients undergoing endometriosis surgery, assessing benefits of CBT in postoperative care.\nWu et al.32 assessed the benefits of CBT plus usual care compared to usual care alone in post-surgical endometriosis patients with a case-control study (Intervention group n = 48, Control group n = 48), utilising one CBT session before and six sessions post-surgery. During a 6-month follow-up, participants provided a score on the depression, anxiety, and stress (DASS-21). Anxiety scores improved significantly (p = 0.0091).\nAuthors suggest patient education played a large role in self-management of ERPP following CBT.\nMindfulness\nMindfulness is a psychological technique that draws on awareness and non-judgemental acceptance of present personal experience. The mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) programme, was first developed by Kabat-Zinn33 as an adjunct to treatment for chronic pain, through relating physical and psychological conditions.\nMoreira et al.34 performed an RCT to assess the impact of mindfulness on CPP. They adapted the MBSR programme, forming a brief mindfulness-based intervention (bMBI, n = 31, usual care controls n = 32) which had a reduced intensity and reduced duration (4-weeks instead of 8-weeks). Formal meditation was practised around the theme of ‘reconceptualising pain.’ The intervention group showed reduced pain scores & unpleasantness and dyschezia.\nHansen et al.35 found that psychological intervention, with a mindfulness focus, did not reduce perception of pain, but did improve QOL in a three-armed RCT. Participants were randomised to three groups: mindfulness and acceptance-based intervention (n = 20), non-specific psychological intervention that did not include mindfulness (relaxation and guided physical therapy) (n = 19), or a waitlist control that included usual treatment (n = 19). All participants received usual treatment which included analgesia. The ten-week programme developed (MY-ENDO), combined Kabat-Zinn’s MBSR programme and acceptance with commitment therapy. There was no statistically significant reduction in ERPP between the MY-ENDO group and non-specific intervention group (p = 0.144, d = 0.59). Psychological intervention significantly improved QOL-subscales ‘control and powerlessness’ (p = 0.019, d = 0.78), ‘emotional well-being’ (p = 0.003, d = 1.01), and ‘social support’ (p = 0.042, d = 0.66).\nQOL was improved through the positive effects on bowel symptoms, specifically diarrhoea (P = 0.035, d = 0.25), within the two intervention groups, thought to be due to physical activity undertaken.\nFurther studies are needed to determine whether psychological interventions in general improves QOL or whether there is a need for a mindfulness aspect to the intervention.\nYoga\nYoga has a long tradition in managing chronic pain. In an AB-design pilot study of 42 women by Ravins et al.,36 participants underwent eight-weeks of conventional therapy followed by eight-weeks of 90-minute endometriosis yoga sessions, bi-weekly. EHP-30 scores and numerical pain rating scale were lower following the completion of the yoga sessions (p = 0.001).\nGonçalves’ RCT37 randomly allocated 40 women; an intervention group who practised 90-minutes of yoga bi-weekly for 8 weeks (n = 28) and a control group who did not practise yoga (n = 12). Daily pain was significantly lower among the intervention group (p = 0.0007). EHP-30 domains were assessed at the time of presentation and again at 8-week follow up; pain (p = 0.0046), well-being (p = 0.0009), and image (p = 0.0087) from the central questionnaire, and work (p = 0.0027) and treatment (p = 0.0245) from the modular questionnaire were significantly different. One limitation of this study was the high loss to follow up, with only 57% of participants in the intervention group completing the full yoga-programme, highlighting the challenges faced of adhering to regular yoga practice.\nSimilar findings were echoed by Saxena et al.38 in a randomised case-control study of 60 women with CPP. The intervention group (n = 30) who received yoga therapy with conventional therapy (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, NSAIDs) were compared with the control group (n = 30) who received NSAIDs alone. Pain scores through VAS score and QOL by the World Health Organization quality of life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) questionnaire were assessed at the start of the study and again at an 8-week follow up. The yoga-practising group showed a significant decrease in pain intensity (p < 0.001) and improvement in the QOL with a significant increase (p < 0.001) in physical, psychological, social, and environmental domain scores of WHOQOL-BREF.\nEnriched environments (consisting of enlarged space, increased physical activity and social interactions) suppresses the development of endometriosis in mice through attenuated adrenergic signalling, enhanced autophagy, and reduced leptin levels.39 Extrapolating this to humans, offering group outdoor physical activities such yoga to optimise environmental enrichment showed significantly less ERPP and perceived stress, improved mood and emotional wellbeing QOL compared with control participants in a recent RCT by Flores.40\nProgressive muscle relaxation (PMR)\nPMR improved anxiety and depression (p < 0.05), and health-related QOL (p < 0.05) for patients with endometriosis in a study of 100 women receiving Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist treatment. Participants were randomly assigned either to a control group or PMR group, who received 12 weeks of PMR training.41\nPsychological and physical interventions positively impact on QOL in patients with ERPP. However, there remains a lack of high-powered trials in mind and body therapies. Consideration must be taken for the barriers to accessing psychological interventions. Patients should not feel their pain is less validated if a physiological approach is offered. Smart-phone applications are nowadays suggested to simplify access to Mindfulness. However, those approaches require co-development with stakeholders to be acceptable and used regularly.42\nPelvic floor muscle physiotherapy\nPelvic floor muscle dysfunction (specifically levator ani hypertonia and incomplete relaxation) contributes to ERPP with deep infiltrative endometriosis (DIE).43–45\nPelvic floor physiotherapy (PFP), with 3D/4D trans-perineal ultrasound, increased levator hiatus area (LHA) which in turn improved dyspareunia and pelvic floor muscle relaxation (PFMR) reduced ERPP. Following a successful pilot study,46 Forno et al. used trans-perineal ultrasound to assess LHA before and after PFP in an RCT of 34 women.47 Participants were assigned to a no intervention group (n = 17), or the treatment group which involved five PFP sessions (n = 17). Physiotherapy sessions involved the Thiele massage, using digital pressure to elongate and relax muscles, restoring normal tone. PFMR improved on maximum Valsalva manoeuvre in the intervention group compared to the control (20.0 ± 24.8% vs –0.5 ± 3.3%, respectively; p = 0.02), and superficial dyspareunia pain scores reduced (p < 0.01).\nPrevious studies have shown acupuncture to be a suitable tool in reducing ERPP, and is considered a safe therapy with minimal side effects.48,49 Several recent case studies have shown symptomatic improvement with acupuncture.50,51 Yan et al. published a protocol for SR and meta-analysis of RCTs on acupuncture benefits for endometriosis symptoms. ESHRE guidelines52 acknowledge that acupuncture may be a beneficial tool, however the studies that were available at that time were limited and not free from bias.\nWang et al.53 recently published a systematic review of 15 RCTs (sample sizes between 10 and 54), which assessed the effectiveness of acupuncture and/or moxibustion for the treatment of endometriosis. Compared with sham acupuncture, actual acupuncture was more effective at reducing dysmenorrhoea VAS pain score (mean difference [MD] − 2.40, 95% CI [− 2.80, − 2.00]; moderate certainty evidence), pelvic pain VAS score (MD − 2.65, 95% CI [− 3.40, − 1.90]; high certainty evidence) and dyspareunia VAS scores (MD − 2.88, [− 3.83, − 1.93]), lessened the size of ovarian cyst (MD − 3.88, 95% CI [− 7.06, − 0.70]), and improved QOL. These promising results suggest that acupuncture is an effective adjunct to treating ERPP.\nIn a multicentre, randomised, single-blind, placebo-controlled trial54 assessing the effects of acupuncture on endometriosis related symptoms (n = 106), acupuncture was delivered to the intervention group (n = 51) as 30-minute sessions once daily, three times a week, starting one week before expected onset of menstruation, for a total duration of 12-weeks. The control group (n = 53) received sham acupuncture. Lower VAS scores were seen in the intervention group at 12 weeks for dysmenorrhoea (-2.82 (-3.47, -2.18) and QOL, (EHPscore) -18.88 (-31.88, -5.87)), but not for pelvic pain and dyspareunia. At 24 weeks no statistical benefits were seen, suggesting acupuncture is a suitable immediate therapy for endometriosis related dysmenorrhoea, however the effects of acupuncture may not be sustainable over a long period of time and repeated therapy would be necessary.\nPhallus length reducing devices\nThe Ohnut© device is a phallus length reducer worn over the penis or penetrating object with the intention to reduce endometriosis-associated deep dyspareunia. The effectiveness of this device is currently being assessed in a pilot RCT of 40 participants by Zhang55 who will be randomised into an intervention group or a waitlist control group.\nTranscutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)\nA TENS unit passes a current through electrodes placed on the skin for targeted pain relief via the gate control theory.56 Its use has been shown to reduce pain in primary dysmenorrhoea57 and CPP.58,59\nMira et al.60 conducted a multicentre RCT of 101 participants with DIE. The study aimed to identify whether the addition of a TENS unit to hormonal therapy (intervention group; n = 53) would provide a greater therapeutic benefit than hormonal treatment alone (control group; n = 48). The TENS device was used twice a day, 20 minutes per day, for 8 weeks. CPP improved in the intervention group (VAS decreased from 7.11 ± 2.40–4.55 ± 3.08, p < 0.001, 36% decrease), whereas it did not in the control group (VAS from 7.33 ± 2.09–7.06 ± 2.33, p = 0.554, 3.68% decrease). A greater improvement in deep dyspareunia was found in the intervention group, 32.67% reduction vs. 13.84% reduction in the control group. There was a decrease in the number of days participants experienced pain from the first week to the eighth week (from 3.27 to 2.22, p = 0.028, 32.11% decrease), which was not identified in the control group (from 4.55 to 4.07, p = 0.203, 10.54% decrease). This study was conducted over a relatively short time interval, therefore due to the chronic nature of endometriosis, further research is needed to assess whether benefits from TENS units are sustained longer-term.\nA cross sectional survey61 of 113 women with pelvic, perineal pain, dyspareunia or endometriosis was conducted to gather information regarding patient cannabis use. 26/113 (23%) participants reported cannabis use, of which only 5/26 obtained cannabis through a medical programme, 25 had complete data and were analysed. 15/25 (60%) used a combination of cannabidiol (CBD) and tetrahydrocannabinol (THC). There was no significant difference between the demographics of cannabis users and nonusers. Overall, 24/25 (96%) of participants reported improvement in symptoms such as pain, depression and sleep disturbance with the use of cannabis. It is important to note that participants from both groups also utilised alternative medications and therapies, and therefore reported symptom improvement cannot be confidently solely attributed to cannabis use.\nTraditional Chinese medicine (TCM)\nZhao et al.62 performed a non-blinded RCT of 320 patients undergoing endometriosis surgery to investigate the effects of TCM (activating blood circulation and removing blood stasis treatment based on syndrome differentiation; n = 131) and Western medicine (GnRH agonist or progesterones; n = 141) on QOL postoperatively.\nPre-treatment WHOQOL-BREF scores, a QOL assessment tool with four domains including physical health, psychological, social relationships and environment, showed no significant difference between the two groups (p > 0.05), however post-treatment scores in the TCM group were significantly improved (p < 0.05) and the scores of 4 items (mobility, activities of daily living, sexual activity, QOL score) were also statistically significantly better (p < 0.05).\nFlower et al.63 published a Cochrane review assessing the effects of Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) for endometriosis, however only 2 RCTs were included (n = 158), neither of which assessed CHM vs. placebo. The first showed no significant different in ERPP between CHM and gestrinone administration post laparoscopic treatment (95.65% vs. 93.87%; risk ratio (RR) 1.02, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.93 to 1.12, one RCT). Combined oral CHM and herbal enema provided better improvement in dysmenorrhoea than with danazol (RR 5.06, 95% CI 1.28 to 20.05; RR 5.63, 95% CI 1.47 to 21.54, respectively). There was no significant difference in lumbosacral pain, rectal discomfort, or vaginal nodule tenderness between CHM and danazol. Flower reports a paucity of robust studies assessing the effects of CHM and that the current studies available have been too small to apply statistical analysis.\nThe previous cornerstones of endometriosis care have been shaken. Neuromodulators are less effective than assumed,6 a meaningful proportion do not get pain relief from surgery3 and ⅓ do not respond to progesterone. Complementary, self-management and lifestyle approaches are moving from fringe interest into mainstream endometriosis care.\nA historic RCT64 has shown multimodal holistic approaches yield superior outcomes to early laparoscopy in CPP.\nCurrent endometriosis centre accreditation weights bowel surgery heavily but patient education and signposting to holistic evidence-based care is left to enthusiastic HCPs, specialist nurses and patient charities, resulting in care inequities. Accreditation hinges on a multidisciplinary team of surgeons/urologists, but not with pelvic pain physiotherapists, nutritionists and psychologists.\nNumerous calls for more research into complementary approaches need to be answered by appropriate funding.\nWithin a patient journey, complementary approaches could be used in the following models as a primary approach or in conjunction with routine treatment.4\n1. Future women’s health hubs can identify DIE, likely to respond to surgery with specialised scanning even before referral to secondary and tertiary care. Models initiating this in the community would improve patient journeys and shorten the delay in endometriosis patients accessing care.\n2. Peri-operatively in the context of pre- and rehabilitation: surgery should no longer be seen in isolation but embedded in education and self-care. Clinicians observe patients recover faster and better from endometriosis surgery if they go into surgery having practised pre-habilitation.\n3. An adjunct to hormonal, surgical and pain-relieving western approaches.\n4. In the future, complementary and self-care techniques may be used in prevention of disease recurrence, whereas today the only evidence base is in hormonal manipulation65 but future evidence may enable clinicians to recommend preventive approaches.\n- 1. Smolarz B, Szyłło K, Romanowicz H: Endometriosis: Epidemiology, Classification, Pathogenesis, Treatment and Genetics (Review of Literature). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021; 22(19). PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text\n- 2. Zheng P, Zhang W, Leng J, et al.: Research on central sensitization of endometriosis-associated pain: a systematic review of the literature. J. Pain Res. 2019; 12: 1447–1456. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text\n- 3. Singh SS, Gude K, Perdeaux E, et al.: Surgical Outcomes in Patients With Endometriosis: A Systematic Review. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Can. 2020; 42(7): 881–888.e11. Publisher Full Text\n- 4. Ball E, Karavadra B, Kremer-Yeatman BJ, et al.: Systematic review of patient-specific pre-operative predictors of pain improvement to endometriosis surgery. Reprod. Fertil. 2021; 2(1): 69–80. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text\n- 5. Le Guen M, Schantz C, Régnier-Loilier A, et al.: Reasons for rejecting hormonal contraception in Western countries: A systematic review. Soc. Sci. Med. 2021; 284: 114247. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text\n- 6. Vincent K, Baranowski A, Bhattacharya S, et al.: GaPP2, a multicentre randomised controlled trial of the efficacy of gabapentin for the management of chronic pelvic pain in women: study protocol. BMJ Open. 2018; 8(1): e014924. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text\n- 7. Koirala B, Peeler A, Dennison Himmelfarb C, et al.: Living with multiple chronic conditions: How we achieve holistic care and optimize health outcomes. J. Adv. Nurs. 2023; 79(2): e7–e9. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text\n- 8. Field R, Pourkazemi F, Turton J, et al.: Dietary Interventions Are Beneficial for Patients with Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis. Pain Med. 2021; 22(3): 694–714. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text\n- 9. Genel F, Kale M, Pavlovic N, et al.: Health effects of a low-inflammatory diet in adults with arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Nutr. Sci. 2020; 9: e37. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text\n- 10. Brain K, Burrows TL, Bruggink L, et al.: Diet and Chronic Non-Cancer Pain: The State of the Art and Future Directions. J. Clin. Med. 2021; 10(21). PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text\n- 11. Ustianowska K, Ustianowski Ł, Machaj F, et al.: The Role of the Human Microbiome in the Pathogenesis of Pain. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022; 23(21). PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text\n- 12. Nirgianakis K, Egger K, Kalaitzopoulos DR, et al.: Effectiveness of Dietary Interventions in the Treatment of Endometriosis: a Systematic Review. Reprod. Sci. 2022; 29(1): 26–42. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text\n- 13. Cobellis L, Castaldi MA, Giordano V, et al.: Effectiveness of the association micronized N-Palmitoylethanolamine (PEA)-transpolydatin in the treatment of chronic pelvic pain related to endometriosis after laparoscopic assessment: a pilot study. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2011; 158(1): 82–86. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text\n- 14. Giugliano E, Cagnazzo E, Soave I, et al.: The adjuvant use of N-palmitoylethanolamine and transpolydatin in the treatment of endometriotic pain. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2013; 168(2): 209–213. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text\n- 15. Indraccolo U, Barbieri F: Effect of palmitoylethanolamide-polydatin combination on chronic pelvic pain associated with endometriosis: preliminary observations. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2010; 150(1): 76–79. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text\n- 16. Sverrisdóttir U, Hansen S, Rudnicki M: Impact of diet on pain perception in women with endometriosis: A systematic review. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2022; 271: 245–249. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text\n- 17. Moore JS, Gibson PR, Perry RE, et al.: Endometriosis in patients with irritable bowel syndrome: Specific symptomatic and demographic profile, and response to the low FODMAP diet. Aust. N. Z. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2017; 57(2): 201–205. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text\n- 18. Yuk JS, Shin JS, Shin JY, et al.: Nickel Allergy Is a Risk Factor for Endometriosis: An 11-Year Population-Based Nested Case-Control Study. PLoS One. 2015; 10(10): e0139388. Publisher Full Text\n- 19. Borghini R, Porpora MG, Casale R, et al.: Irritable Bowel Syndrome-Like Disorders in Endometriosis: Prevalence of Nickel Sensitivity and Effects of a Low-Nickel Diet. An Open-Label Pilot Study. Nutrients. 2020; 12(2). PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text\n- 20. Krabbenborg I, de Roos N , van der Grinten P , et al.: Diet quality and perceived effects of dietary changes in Dutch endometriosis patients: an observational study. Reprod. Biomed. Online. 2021; 43(5): 952–961. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text\n- 21. Amirsalari S, Behboodi Moghadam Z, Taghizadeh Z, et al.: The Effect of Garlic Tablets on the Endometriosis-Related Pains: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial. Evid. Based Complement. Alternat. Med. 2021; 2021: 5547058.\n- 22. Liu Y, Zhang W: Association between body mass index and endometriosis risk: a meta-analysis. Oncotarget. 2017; 8(29): 46928–46936. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text\n- 23. Hong J, Yi KW: What is the link between endometriosis and adiposity? Obstet. Gynecol. Sci. 2022; 65(3): 227–233. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text\n- 24. Netzl J, Gusy B, Voigt B, et al.: Chronic Pelvic Pain in Endometriosis: Cross-Sectional Associations with Mental Disorders, Sexual Dysfunctions and Childhood Maltreatment. J. Clin. Med. 2022; 11(13). Publisher Full Text\n- 25. McPeak AE, Allaire C, Williams C, et al.: Pain Catastrophizing and Pain Health-Related Quality-of-Life in Endometriosis. Clin. J. Pain. 2018; 34(4): 349–356. Publisher Full Text\n- 26. Carey ET, Martin CE, Siedhoff MT, et al.: Biopsychosocial correlates of persistent postsurgical pain in women with endometriosis. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2014; 124(2): 169–173. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text\n- 27. Gholiof M, Adamson-De Luca E, Foster WG, et al.: Prevalence of Use and Perceived Effectiveness of Medical, Surgical, and Alternative Therapies for Endometriosis Pain in Canadians. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Can. 2023; 45(1): 11–20. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text\n- 28. Brooks T, Sharp R, Evans S, et al.: Psychological Interventions for Women with Persistent Pelvic Pain: A Survey of Mental Health Clinicians. J. Multidiscip. Healthc. 2021; 14: 1725–1740. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text\n- 29. Schubert K, Lohse J, Kalder M, et al.: Internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy for improving health-related quality of life in patients with endometriosis: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2022; 23(1): 300. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text\n- 30. Boersen Z, Oosterman J, Hameleers EG, et al.: Determining the effectiveness of cognitive behavioural therapy in improving quality of life in patients undergoing endometriosis surgery: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2021; 11(12): e054896. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text\n- 31. Mikocka-Walus A, Druitt M, O’Shea M, et al.: Yoga, cognitive-behavioural therapy versus education to improve quality of life and reduce healthcare costs in people with endometriosis: a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2021; 11(8): e046603. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text\n- 32. Wu S, Wang X, Liu H, et al.: Efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy after the surgical treatment of women with endometriosis: A preliminary case-control study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022; 101(51): e32433. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text\n- 33. Noonan S: Mindfulness-based stress reduction. Can. Vet. J. 2014; 55(2): 134–135.\n- 34. Moreira MF, Gamboa OL, Pinho Oliveira MA: A single-blind, randomized, pilot study of a brief mindfulness-based intervention for the endometriosis-related pain management. Eur. J. Pain. 2022; 26(5): 1147–1162. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text\n- 35. Hansen KE, Brandsborg B, Kesmodel US, et al.: Psychological interventions improve quality of life despite persistent pain in endometriosis: results of a 3-armed randomized controlled trial. Qual. Life Res. 2023; 32(6): 1727–1744. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text\n- 36. Ravins I, Joseph G, Tene L: The Effect of Practicing “Endometriosis Yoga” on Stress and Quality of Life for Women with Endometriosis: AB Design Pilot Study. Altern. Ther. Health Med. 2023; 29(3): 8–14.\n- 37. Gonçalves AV, Barros NF, Bahamondes L: The Practice of Hatha Yoga for the Treatment of Pain Associated with Endometriosis. J. Altern. Complement. Med. 2017; 23(1): 45–52. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text\n- 38. Saxena R, Gupta M, Shankar N, et al.: Effects of yogic intervention on pain scores and quality of life in females with chronic pelvic pain. Int. J. Yoga. 2017; 10(1): 9–15. Publisher Full Text\n- 39. Yin B, Jiang H, Liu X, et al.: Enriched Environment Decelerates the Development of Endometriosis in Mouse. Reprod. Sci. 2020; 27(7): 1423–1435. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text\n- 40. I F, B B-C, G DH, D R-S, V L-R, C N-V et al.: Impact of Environmental Enrichment on Pain, Perceived Stress, Mental Health and Quality of Life of Women with Endometriosis The World Congress on Endometriosis; Edinburgh, UK.2023.\n- 41. Zhao L, Wu H, Zhou X, et al.: Effects of progressive muscular relaxation training on anxiety, depression and quality of life of endometriosis patients under gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist therapy. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2012; 162(2): 211–215. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text\n- 42. Ball E, Rivas C: Health Apps Require Co-development to Be Acceptable and Effective. Front. Psychol. 2021; 12: 714453. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text\n- 43. Fraga MV, Oliveira Brito LG, Yela DA, et al.: Pelvic floor muscle dysfunctions in women with deep infiltrative endometriosis: An underestimated association. Int. J. Clin. Pract. 2021; 75(8): e14350. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text\n- 44. da Silva JP , de Almeida BM , Ferreira RS, et al.: Sensory and muscular functions of the pelvic floor in women with endometriosis - cross-sectional study. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2023; 308(1): 163–170. Publisher Full Text\n- 45. Arena A, Degli Esposti E, Cocchi L, et al.: Three-Dimensional Ultrasound Evaluation of Pelvic Floor Muscle Contraction in Women Affected by Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis: Application of a Quick Contraction Scale. J. Ultrasound Med. 2022; 41(12): 2973–2979. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text\n- 46. Del Forno S, Arena A, Alessandrini M, et al.: Transperineal Ultrasound Visual Feedback Assisted Pelvic Floor Muscle Physiotherapy in Women With Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis and Dyspareunia: A Pilot Study. J. Sex Marital Ther. 2020; 46(7): 603–611. Publisher Full Text\n- 47. Del Forno S, Arena A, Pellizzone V, et al.: Assessment of levator hiatal area using 3D/4D transperineal ultrasound in women with deep infiltrating endometriosis and superficial dyspareunia treated with pelvic floor muscle physiotherapy: randomized controlled trial. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2021; 57(5): 726–732. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text\n- 48. Mira TAA, Buen MM, Borges MG, et al.: Systematic review and meta-analysis of complementary treatments for women with symptomatic endometriosis. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2018; 143(1): 2–9. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text\n- 49. Payne JA: Acupuncture for Endometriosis: A Case Study. Med Acupunct. 31. United States: Copyright 2019, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., Publishers; 2019; pp. 392–394.\n- 50. Martin BR: Multimodal Care for Headaches, Lumbopelvic Pain, and Dysmenorrhea in a Woman With Endometriosis: A Case Report. J. Chiropr. Med. 2021; 20: 148–157. 20. United States: © 2022 by National University of Health Sciences. Publisher Full Text\n- 51. Yan Q, Li J, Zeng J: The role of acupuncture in the treatment of women with pain in endometriosis: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021; 100(49): e27582. Publisher Full Text\n- 52. Becker CM, Bokor A, Heikinheimo O, et al.: ESHRE guideline: endometriosis. Hum. Reprod. Open. 2022; 2022(2): hoac009. Publisher Full Text\n- 53. Wang Y, Coyle ME, Hong M, et al.: Acupuncture and moxibustion for endometriosis: A systematic review and analysis. Complement. Ther. Med. 2023; 76: 102963. Publisher Full Text\n- 54. Li PS, Peng XM, Niu XX, et al.: Efficacy of acupuncture for endometriosis-associated pain: a multicenter randomized single-blind placebo-controlled trial. Fertil. Steril. 2023; 119(5): 815–823. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text\n- 55. Zhang SXJ, MacLeod RGK, Parmar G, et al.: Ohnut Versus a Waitlist Control for the Self-management of Endometriosis-Associated Deep Dyspareunia: Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Res. Protoc. 2023; 12: e39834. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text\n- 56. Teoli D, An J: Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation. StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing. Copyright © 2023, StatPearls Publishing LLC; 2023.\n- 57. Arik MI, Kiloatar H, Aslan B, et al.: The effect of TENS for pain relief in women with primary dysmenorrhea: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Explore (N.Y.). 2022; 18(1): 108–113. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text\n- 58. Bridger C, Prabhala T, Dawson R, et al.: Neuromodulation for Chronic Pelvic Pain: A Single-Institution Experience With a Collaborative Team. Neurosurgery. 2021; 88(4): 819–827. Publisher Full Text\n- 59. Guy M, Foucher C, Juhel C, et al.: Transcutaneous electrical neurostimulation relieves primary dysmenorrhea: A randomized, double-blind clinical study versus placebo. Prog. Urol. 2022; 32(7): 487–497. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text\n- 60. Mira TAA, Yela DA, Podgaec S, et al.: Hormonal treatment isolated versus hormonal treatment associated with electrotherapy for pelvic pain control in deep endometriosis: Randomized clinical trial. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2020; 255: 134–141. Publisher Full Text\n- 61. Carrubba AR, Ebbert JO, Spaulding AC, et al.: Use of Cannabis for Self-Management of Chronic Pelvic Pain. J. Womens Health (Larchmt). 2021; 30(9): 1344–1351. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text\n- 62. Zhao RH, Liu Y, Tan Y, et al.: Chinese medicine improves postoperative quality of life in endometriosis patients: a randomized controlled trial. Chin. J. Integr. Med. 2013; 19(1): 15–21. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text\n- 63. Flower A, Liu JP, Lewith G, et al.: Chinese herbal medicine for endometriosis. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2012; 2012(5): CD006568. Publisher Full Text\n- 64. Peters AA, van Dorst E , Jellis B, et al.: A randomized clinical trial to compare two different approaches in women with chronic pelvic pain. Obstet. Gynecol. 1991; 77(5): 740–744. PubMed Abstract\n- 65. Zheng Q, Mao H, Xu Y, et al.: Can postoperative GnRH agonist treatment prevent endometriosis recurrence? A meta-analysis. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2016; 294(1): 201–207. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text\nAuthor details Author details\n1 Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust, London, England, UK\n2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, E1 1FR, UK\n3 Centre for Maternal & Child Health Research, School of Health Sciences, City University of London, UK\n2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, E1 1FR, UK\n3 Centre for Maternal & Child Health Research, School of Health Sciences, City University of London, UK\nJessica Desai\nRoles: Data Curation, Writing – Original Draft Preparation\nRoles: Data Curation, Writing – Original Draft Preparation\nSophie Strong\nRoles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Supervision, Writing – Original Draft Preparation\nRoles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Supervision, Writing – Original Draft Preparation\nElizabeth Ball\nRoles: Conceptualization, Methodology, Resources, Supervision, Writing – Review & Editing\nRoles: Conceptualization, Methodology, Resources, Supervision, Writing – Review & Editing\nCompeting interests\nNo competing interests were disclosed.\nGrant information\nThis study was supported by the Centre for Maternal & Child Health Research, School of Health Sciences, City University of London.\nThe funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.\nThe funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.\nArticle Versions (2)\nCopyright\n© 2024 Desai J et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.\nmetrics\n| Views | Downloads | |\n|---|---|---|\n| F1000Research | - | - |\n| PubMed Central Data from PMC are received and updated monthly. | - | - |\nCitations\nCITE\nhow to cite this article\nDesai J, Strong S and Ball E. Holistic approaches to living well with endometriosis [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]. F1000Research 2024, 13:359 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.142586.1)\nNOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.\ntrack\nreceive updates on this article\nTrack an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.\nCurrent Reviewer Status: ?\nKey to Reviewer Statuses VIEW HIDE\nApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested\nApproved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.\nNot approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions\nVersion 1\nVERSION 1\nPUBLISHED 23 Apr 2024 Views\n0\nHow to cite this report:\nSaunders PT. Reviewer Report For: Holistic approaches to living well with endometriosis [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]. F1000Research 2024, 13:359 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.156153.r292395) The direct URL for this report is:\nhttps://f1000research.com/articles/13-359/v1#referee-response-292395\nhttps://f1000research.com/articles/13-359/v1#referee-response-292395\nNOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation.\nReviewer Report 22 Jul 2024\nNot Approved\nVIEWS 0\nEndometriosis is an incurable disorder and as the authors correctly state patients are often keen to try non-medical approaches to manage symptoms including chronic pain, bloating and fatigue. Some approaches including physiotherapy are often included in multidisciplinary care and information ... Continue reading\n2. Horne AW, Vincent K, Hewitt CA, Middleton LJ, et al.: Gabapentin for chronic pelvic pain in women (GaPP2): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.Lancet. 2020; 396 (10255): 909-917 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text\n3. Velho RV, Werner F, Mechsner S: Endo Belly: What Is It and Why Does It Happen?-A Narrative Review.J Clin Med. 2023; 12 (22). PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text\n4. Karp BI, Stratton P: Applications of botulinum toxin to the female pelvic floor: Botulinum toxin for genito-pelvic pain penetration disorder and chronic pelvic pain in women.Toxicon. 2023; 230: 107162 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text\n5. Genovese T, Cordaro M, Siracusa R, Impellizzeri D, et al.: Molecular and Biochemical Mechanism of Cannabidiol in the Management of the Inflammatory and Oxidative Processes Associated with Endometriosis.Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23 (10). PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text\n6. Liang AL, Gingher EL, Coleman JS: Medical Cannabis for Gynecologic Pain Conditions: A Systematic Review.Obstet Gynecol. 2022; 139 (2): 287-296 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text\n7. Armour M, Sinclair J, Chalmers KJ, Smith CA: Self-management strategies amongst Australian women with endometriosis: a national online survey.BMC Complement Altern Med. 2019; 19 (1): 17 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text\nI confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to state that I do not consider it to be of an acceptable scientific standard, for reasons outlined above. Close\nEndometriosis is an incurable disorder and as the authors correctly state patients are often keen to try non-medical approaches to manage symptoms including chronic pain, bloating and fatigue. Some approaches including physiotherapy are often included in multidisciplinary care and information on patient websites includes a wide range of complementary therapies some of which are discussed in this review [https://www.endometriosis-uk.org/].\nThe authors are to be commended on bringing together information about a very wide range of potential interventions and their assessment that many individuals with symptomatic endometriosis are keen to explore self management and alternative therapies as part of their care plan is something increasingly reported by health care professionals.\nThe section entitled ‘Recent findings’ makes some dogmatic statements and it was not clear they were backed up by the latest data – this was particularly true of nutrition which is a fast moving field.\nGiven the importance of the topic it is of concern that there appears to be an overall lack of ‘balance’ in the paper with a lot of emphasis in the first section placed on a systematic reviews – REFs 1-5, 8,9,12.\nIn some parts of the text it is hard to know if the results discussed relate to individuals with CPP or those with CPP/Endo so careful re-reading and clarification of is advised (examples include yoga, TENS, mindfulness). [table of mind and body therapies?]\nIt is recommended that the authors assemble information from relevant high quality original information from trials in tables – this would be more useful to the reader than simple text. Authors are referred to a number of recent reviews related to the impact of diet, inflammation and the gut brain axis as sources of information.\nAdditional References\nEsprit2 trial has a published protocol [Ref -1].\nReference 6 is to a protocol – the trial has been completed and the correct reference is\n[Ref -2]\nIn section on nutrition it would be useful to mention GWAS and other data that support patient experience of IBS-like symptoms in association with endometriosis (includes abdominal bloating [Ref-3], diarrhoea etc).\nRecent paper [Ref-3]\nNo mention of botox for treatment of pelvic floor pain although there are reports it is effective · [Ref -4]\nThe section on cannabinoids is very brief which seems at odds with the widespread use of CBD in management of chronic pain, in some countries they are prescribed and there are several trials for endometriosis CPP underway – add more references. [Ref 5-7]\nAdd more details from Ref 64 – this paper is from 1991 – any follow up papers?\nThe authors are to be commended on bringing together information about a very wide range of potential interventions and their assessment that many individuals with symptomatic endometriosis are keen to explore self management and alternative therapies as part of their care plan is something increasingly reported by health care professionals.\nThe section entitled ‘Recent findings’ makes some dogmatic statements and it was not clear they were backed up by the latest data – this was particularly true of nutrition which is a fast moving field.\nGiven the importance of the topic it is of concern that there appears to be an overall lack of ‘balance’ in the paper with a lot of emphasis in the first section placed on a systematic reviews – REFs 1-5, 8,9,12.\nIn some parts of the text it is hard to know if the results discussed relate to individuals with CPP or those with CPP/Endo so careful re-reading and clarification of is advised (examples include yoga, TENS, mindfulness). [table of mind and body therapies?]\nIt is recommended that the authors assemble information from relevant high quality original information from trials in tables – this would be more useful to the reader than simple text. Authors are referred to a number of recent reviews related to the impact of diet, inflammation and the gut brain axis as sources of information.\nAdditional References\nEsprit2 trial has a published protocol [Ref -1].\nReference 6 is to a protocol – the trial has been completed and the correct reference is\n[Ref -2]\nIn section on nutrition it would be useful to mention GWAS and other data that support patient experience of IBS-like symptoms in association with endometriosis (includes abdominal bloating [Ref-3], diarrhoea etc).\nRecent paper [Ref-3]\nNo mention of botox for treatment of pelvic floor pain although there are reports it is effective · [Ref -4]\nThe section on cannabinoids is very brief which seems at odds with the widespread use of CBD in management of chronic pain, in some countries they are prescribed and there are several trials for endometriosis CPP underway – add more references. [Ref 5-7]\nAdd more details from Ref 64 – this paper is from 1991 – any follow up papers?\n-\nIs the topic of the review discussed comprehensively in the context of the current literature?\nNo\n-\nAre all factual statements correct and adequately supported by citations?\nNo\n-\nIs the review written in accessible language?\nYes\n-\nAre the conclusions drawn appropriate in the context of the current research literature?\nNo\nReferences\n1. Mackenzie SC, Stephen J, Williams L, Daniels J, et al.: Effectiveness of laparoscopic removal of isolated superficial peritoneal endometriosis for the management of chronic pelvic pain in women (ESPriT2): protocol for a multi-centre randomised controlled trial.Trials. 2023; 24 (1): 425 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text2. Horne AW, Vincent K, Hewitt CA, Middleton LJ, et al.: Gabapentin for chronic pelvic pain in women (GaPP2): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.Lancet. 2020; 396 (10255): 909-917 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text\n3. Velho RV, Werner F, Mechsner S: Endo Belly: What Is It and Why Does It Happen?-A Narrative Review.J Clin Med. 2023; 12 (22). PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text\n4. Karp BI, Stratton P: Applications of botulinum toxin to the female pelvic floor: Botulinum toxin for genito-pelvic pain penetration disorder and chronic pelvic pain in women.Toxicon. 2023; 230: 107162 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text\n5. Genovese T, Cordaro M, Siracusa R, Impellizzeri D, et al.: Molecular and Biochemical Mechanism of Cannabidiol in the Management of the Inflammatory and Oxidative Processes Associated with Endometriosis.Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23 (10). PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text\n6. Liang AL, Gingher EL, Coleman JS: Medical Cannabis for Gynecologic Pain Conditions: A Systematic Review.Obstet Gynecol. 2022; 139 (2): 287-296 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text\n7. Armour M, Sinclair J, Chalmers KJ, Smith CA: Self-management strategies amongst Australian women with endometriosis: a national online survey.BMC Complement Altern Med. 2019; 19 (1): 17 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text\nCompeting Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.\nReviewer Expertise: Reproductive biologist, specialising in women's health conditions including endometriosis. Translational research focused on improving range of treatments for chronic pelvic pain including self management strategies.\nCITE\nHOW TO CITE THIS REPORT Saunders PT. Reviewer Report For: Holistic approaches to living well with endometriosis [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]. F1000Research 2024, 13:359 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.156153.r292395)\nThe direct URL for this report is:\nhttps://f1000research.com/articles/13-359/v1#referee-response-292395\nhttps://f1000research.com/articles/13-359/v1#referee-response-292395\nNOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.\n- Author Response 08 Nov 2024Jessica Desai, Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK08 Nov 2024Author ResponseWe thank you for the suggestions and have made the following adjustments:\nIn some parts of the text it is hard to know if the results discussed relate to ... Continue reading We thank you for the suggestions and have made the following adjustments:\nIn some parts of the text it is hard to know if the results discussed relate to individuals with CPP or those with CPP/Endo so careful re-reading and clarification of is advised (examples include yoga, TENS, mindfulness). [table of mind and body therapies?]\n- Clarification has been made on relation to CPP/endometriosis throughout the text\nIt is recommended that the authors assemble information from relevant high quality original information from trials in tables – this would be more useful to the reader than simple text.\n- Please see Table 1\nEsprit2 trial has a published protocol [Ref -1].\n- Espirit2 trial protocol has now been referenced, please see reference 5\nReference 6 is to a protocol – the trial has been completed and the correct reference is\n[Ref -2]\n- Reference amended\nIn section on nutrition it would be useful to mention GWAS and other data that support patient experience of IBS-like symptoms in association with endometriosis (includes abdominal bloating [Ref-3], diarrhoea etc).\nRecent paper [Ref-3]\n- Please see use of reference 23 in our paper\nNo mention of botox for treatment of pelvic floor pain although there are reports it is effective · [Ref -4]\n- Section on botulinum toxin added to paper\nThe section on cannabinoids is very brief which seems at odds with the widespread use of CBD in management of chronic pain, in some countries they are prescribed and there are several trials for endometriosis CPP underway – add more references. [Ref 5-7]\n- CBD section has been expanded, please see references 69, 70\nAdd more details from Ref 64 – this paper is from 1991 – any follow up papers?\n- Section expanded, please refer to reference 76We thank you for the suggestions and have made the following adjustments:Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Close\nIn some parts of the text it is hard to know if the results discussed relate to individuals with CPP or those with CPP/Endo so careful re-reading and clarification of is advised (examples include yoga, TENS, mindfulness). [table of mind and body therapies?]\n- Clarification has been made on relation to CPP/endometriosis throughout the text\nIt is recommended that the authors assemble information from relevant high quality original information from trials in tables – this would be more useful to the reader than simple text.\n- Please see Table 1\nEsprit2 trial has a published protocol [Ref -1].\n- Espirit2 trial protocol has now been referenced, please see reference 5\nReference 6 is to a protocol – the trial has been completed and the correct reference is\n[Ref -2]\n- Reference amended\nIn section on nutrition it would be useful to mention GWAS and other data that support patient experience of IBS-like symptoms in association with endometriosis (includes abdominal bloating [Ref-3], diarrhoea etc).\nRecent paper [Ref-3]\n- Please see use of reference 23 in our paper\nNo mention of botox for treatment of pelvic floor pain although there are reports it is effective · [Ref -4]\n- Section on botulinum toxin added to paper\nThe section on cannabinoids is very brief which seems at odds with the widespread use of CBD in management of chronic pain, in some countries they are prescribed and there are several trials for endometriosis CPP underway – add more references. [Ref 5-7]\n- CBD section has been expanded, please see references 69, 70\nAdd more details from Ref 64 – this paper is from 1991 – any follow up papers?\n- Section expanded, please refer to reference 76\nCOMMENTS ON THIS REPORT\n- Author Response 08 Nov 2024Jessica Desai, Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK08 Nov 2024Author ResponseWe thank you for the suggestions and have made the following adjustments:\nIn some parts of the text it is hard to know if the results discussed relate to ... Continue reading We thank you for the suggestions and have made the following adjustments:\nIn some parts of the text it is hard to know if the results discussed relate to individuals with CPP or those with CPP/Endo so careful re-reading and clarification of is advised (examples include yoga, TENS, mindfulness). [table of mind and body therapies?]\n- Clarification has been made on relation to CPP/endometriosis throughout the text\nIt is recommended that the authors assemble information from relevant high quality original information from trials in tables – this would be more useful to the reader than simple text.\n- Please see Table 1\nEsprit2 trial has a published protocol [Ref -1].\n- Espirit2 trial protocol has now been referenced, please see reference 5\nReference 6 is to a protocol – the trial has been completed and the correct reference is\n[Ref -2]\n- Reference amended\nIn section on nutrition it would be useful to mention GWAS and other data that support patient experience of IBS-like symptoms in association with endometriosis (includes abdominal bloating [Ref-3], diarrhoea etc).\nRecent paper [Ref-3]\n- Please see use of reference 23 in our paper\nNo mention of botox for treatment of pelvic floor pain although there are reports it is effective · [Ref -4]\n- Section on botulinum toxin added to paper\nThe section on cannabinoids is very brief which seems at odds with the widespread use of CBD in management of chronic pain, in some countries they are prescribed and there are several trials for endometriosis CPP underway – add more references. [Ref 5-7]\n- CBD section has been expanded, please see references 69, 70\nAdd more details from Ref 64 – this paper is from 1991 – any follow up papers?\n- Section expanded, please refer to reference 76We thank you for the suggestions and have made the following adjustments:Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Close\nIn some parts of the text it is hard to know if the results discussed relate to individuals with CPP or those with CPP/Endo so careful re-reading and clarification of is advised (examples include yoga, TENS, mindfulness). [table of mind and body therapies?]\n- Clarification has been made on relation to CPP/endometriosis throughout the text\nIt is recommended that the authors assemble information from relevant high quality original information from trials in tables – this would be more useful to the reader than simple text.\n- Please see Table 1\nEsprit2 trial has a published protocol [Ref -1].\n- Espirit2 trial protocol has now been referenced, please see reference 5\nReference 6 is to a protocol – the trial has been completed and the correct reference is\n[Ref -2]\n- Reference amended\nIn section on nutrition it would be useful to mention GWAS and other data that support patient experience of IBS-like symptoms in association with endometriosis (includes abdominal bloating [Ref-3], diarrhoea etc).\nRecent paper [Ref-3]\n- Please see use of reference 23 in our paper\nNo mention of botox for treatment of pelvic floor pain although there are reports it is effective · [Ref -4]\n- Section on botulinum toxin added to paper\nThe section on cannabinoids is very brief which seems at odds with the widespread use of CBD in management of chronic pain, in some countries they are prescribed and there are several trials for endometriosis CPP underway – add more references. [Ref 5-7]\n- CBD section has been expanded, please see references 69, 70\nAdd more details from Ref 64 – this paper is from 1991 – any follow up papers?\n- Section expanded, please refer to reference 76\nViews\n0\nHow to cite this report:\nRaimondo D. Reviewer Report For: Holistic approaches to living well with endometriosis [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]. F1000Research 2024, 13:359 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.156153.r271069) The direct URL for this report is:\nhttps://f1000research.com/articles/13-359/v1#referee-response-271069\nhttps://f1000research.com/articles/13-359/v1#referee-response-271069\nNOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation.\nReviewer Report 02 Jul 2024\nDiego Raimondo, Division of Gynaecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, IRCCS AOUBO, Bologna, Italy\nApproved with Reservations\nVIEWS 0\nAbstract:\nThe abstract is well-structured and provides a clear overview of the topic. However, it could benefit from a concluding sentence that highlights the clinical significance of the findings to enhance reader understanding.\nIntroduction:\nThe ... Continue reading\n2. Ianieri MM, De Cicco Nardone A, Benvenga G, Greco P, et al.: Vascular- and nerve-sparing bowel resection for deep endometriosis: A retrospective single-center study.Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2024; 164 (1): 277-285 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text\nI confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above. Close\nThe abstract is well-structured and provides a clear overview of the topic. However, it could benefit from a concluding sentence that highlights the clinical significance of the findings to enhance reader understanding.\nIntroduction:\nThe ... Continue reading\nAbstract:\nThe abstract is well-structured and provides a clear overview of the topic. However, it could benefit from a concluding sentence that highlights the clinical significance of the findings to enhance reader understanding.\nIntroduction:\nThe introduction is comprehensive and provides adequate context on endometriosis and the challenges associated with its treatment. However, it could benefit from emphasizing more recent research, particularly from the last two to three years.\nPlease discuss on the iatrogenic risk of endometriosis surgery and not only on the risk of recurrence (i.e. Ref [1,2])\nMethods:\nThe methodology section is detailed and rigorous but could use some clarifications.\nInclusion and Exclusion Criteria: Provide more details on the criteria used to include or exclude specific studies.\nSearch Methodology: Describe the databases used and the search terms applied more specifically.\nQuality Assessment: Describe the metrics or tools used to evaluate the quality of the included studies.\nResults:\nThe results are well-presented and supported by a solid evidence base. However, some sections could benefit from more synthesis to improve readability.\nNutrition: The information is detailed and pertinent, but a summary table could help visualize the effects of different dietary interventions better.\nAcupuncture: The acupuncture section is thorough but could benefit from a discussion on the limitations of the cited studies.\nConclusions:\nThe conclusions effectively summarize the key points of the article. However, reinforcing the message on the importance of integrating holistic strategies into clinical practice could enhance the impact.\nGraphs and Tables: Including more graphs and tables to visualize key data could improve the manuscript's comprehensibility and visual appeal..\nThe abstract is well-structured and provides a clear overview of the topic. However, it could benefit from a concluding sentence that highlights the clinical significance of the findings to enhance reader understanding.\nIntroduction:\nThe introduction is comprehensive and provides adequate context on endometriosis and the challenges associated with its treatment. However, it could benefit from emphasizing more recent research, particularly from the last two to three years.\nPlease discuss on the iatrogenic risk of endometriosis surgery and not only on the risk of recurrence (i.e. Ref [1,2])\nMethods:\nThe methodology section is detailed and rigorous but could use some clarifications.\nInclusion and Exclusion Criteria: Provide more details on the criteria used to include or exclude specific studies.\nSearch Methodology: Describe the databases used and the search terms applied more specifically.\nQuality Assessment: Describe the metrics or tools used to evaluate the quality of the included studies.\nResults:\nThe results are well-presented and supported by a solid evidence base. However, some sections could benefit from more synthesis to improve readability.\nNutrition: The information is detailed and pertinent, but a summary table could help visualize the effects of different dietary interventions better.\nAcupuncture: The acupuncture section is thorough but could benefit from a discussion on the limitations of the cited studies.\nConclusions:\nThe conclusions effectively summarize the key points of the article. However, reinforcing the message on the importance of integrating holistic strategies into clinical practice could enhance the impact.\nGraphs and Tables: Including more graphs and tables to visualize key data could improve the manuscript's comprehensibility and visual appeal..\n-\nIs the topic of the review discussed comprehensively in the context of the current literature?\nYes\n-\nAre all factual statements correct and adequately supported by citations?\nYes\n-\nIs the review written in accessible language?\nYes\n-\nAre the conclusions drawn appropriate in the context of the current research literature?\nYes\nReferences\n1. Seracchioli R, Ferrini G, Montanari G, Raimondo D, et al.: Does laparoscopic shaving for deep infiltrating endometriosis alter intestinal function? A prospective study.Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015; 55 (4): 357-62 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text2. Ianieri MM, De Cicco Nardone A, Benvenga G, Greco P, et al.: Vascular- and nerve-sparing bowel resection for deep endometriosis: A retrospective single-center study.Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2024; 164 (1): 277-285 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text\nCompeting Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.\nReviewer Expertise: endometriosis\nCITE\nHOW TO CITE THIS REPORT Raimondo D. Reviewer Report For: Holistic approaches to living well with endometriosis [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]. F1000Research 2024, 13:359 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.156153.r271069)\nThe direct URL for this report is:\nhttps://f1000research.com/articles/13-359/v1#referee-response-271069\nhttps://f1000research.com/articles/13-359/v1#referee-response-271069\nNOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.\n- Author Response 08 Nov 2024Jessica Desai, Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK08 Nov 2024Author ResponseWe thank you for the suggestions and have made the following adjustments to our paper:\nAbstract:\nThe abstract is well-structured and provides a clear overview of the topic. However, ... Continue reading We thank you for the suggestions and have made the following adjustments to our paper:\nAbstract:\nThe abstract is well-structured and provides a clear overview of the topic. However, it could benefit from a concluding sentence that highlights the clinical significance of the findings to enhance reader understanding.\n- Abstract concluding sentence adjusted\nIntroduction:\nThe introduction is comprehensive and provides adequate context on endometriosis and the challenges associated with its treatment. However, it could benefit from emphasizing more recent research, particularly from the last two to three years.\nPlease discuss on the iatrogenic risk of endometriosis surgery and not only on the risk of recurrence (i.e. Ref [1,2])\n- Please refer to reference 6 and 7 cited in the amended submission\nMethods:\nThe methodology section is detailed and rigorous but could use some clarifications.\nInclusion and Exclusion Criteria: Provide more details on the criteria used to include or exclude specific studies.\nSearch Methodology: Describe the databases used and the search terms applied more specifically.\nQuality Assessment: Describe the metrics or tools used to evaluate the quality of the included studies.\n- Inclusion and exclusion criteria, search methodology and quality assessment sections added to paper\nResults:\nThe results are well-presented and supported by a solid evidence base. However, some sections could benefit from more synthesis to improve readability.\nNutrition: The information is detailed and pertinent, but a summary table could help visualize the effects of different dietary interventions better.\nAcupuncture: The acupuncture section is thorough but could benefit from a discussion on the limitations of the cited studies.\n- Limitations of paper reference 62 has been added\nConclusions:\nThe conclusions effectively summarize the key points of the article. However, reinforcing the message on the importance of integrating holistic strategies into clinical practice could enhance the impact.\n- Conclusion has been amended with statement on the importance of integration into clinical practice\nGraphs and Tables: Including more graphs and tables to visualize key data could improve the manuscript's comprehensibility and visual appeal..\n- Please refer to Table 1We thank you for the suggestions and have made the following adjustments to our paper:Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Close\nAbstract:\nThe abstract is well-structured and provides a clear overview of the topic. However, it could benefit from a concluding sentence that highlights the clinical significance of the findings to enhance reader understanding.\n- Abstract concluding sentence adjusted\nIntroduction:\nThe introduction is comprehensive and provides adequate context on endometriosis and the challenges associated with its treatment. However, it could benefit from emphasizing more recent research, particularly from the last two to three years.\nPlease discuss on the iatrogenic risk of endometriosis surgery and not only on the risk of recurrence (i.e. Ref [1,2])\n- Please refer to reference 6 and 7 cited in the amended submission\nMethods:\nThe methodology section is detailed and rigorous but could use some clarifications.\nInclusion and Exclusion Criteria: Provide more details on the criteria used to include or exclude specific studies.\nSearch Methodology: Describe the databases used and the search terms applied more specifically.\nQuality Assessment: Describe the metrics or tools used to evaluate the quality of the included studies.\n- Inclusion and exclusion criteria, search methodology and quality assessment sections added to paper\nResults:\nThe results are well-presented and supported by a solid evidence base. However, some sections could benefit from more synthesis to improve readability.\nNutrition: The information is detailed and pertinent, but a summary table could help visualize the effects of different dietary interventions better.\nAcupuncture: The acupuncture section is thorough but could benefit from a discussion on the limitations of the cited studies.\n- Limitations of paper reference 62 has been added\nConclusions:\nThe conclusions effectively summarize the key points of the article. However, reinforcing the message on the importance of integrating holistic strategies into clinical practice could enhance the impact.\n- Conclusion has been amended with statement on the importance of integration into clinical practice\nGraphs and Tables: Including more graphs and tables to visualize key data could improve the manuscript's comprehensibility and visual appeal..\n- Please refer to Table 1\nCOMMENTS ON THIS REPORT\n- Author Response 08 Nov 2024Jessica Desai, Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK08 Nov 2024Author ResponseWe thank you for the suggestions and have made the following adjustments to our paper:\nAbstract:\nThe abstract is well-structured and provides a clear overview of the topic. However, ... Continue reading We thank you for the suggestions and have made the following adjustments to our paper:\nAbstract:\nThe abstract is well-structured and provides a clear overview of the topic. However, it could benefit from a concluding sentence that highlights the clinical significance of the findings to enhance reader understanding.\n- Abstract concluding sentence adjusted\nIntroduction:\nThe introduction is comprehensive and provides adequate context on endometriosis and the challenges associated with its treatment. However, it could benefit from emphasizing more recent research, particularly from the last two to three years.\nPlease discuss on the iatrogenic risk of endometriosis surgery and not only on the risk of recurrence (i.e. Ref [1,2])\n- Please refer to reference 6 and 7 cited in the amended submission\nMethods:\nThe methodology section is detailed and rigorous but could use some clarifications.\nInclusion and Exclusion Criteria: Provide more details on the criteria used to include or exclude specific studies.\nSearch Methodology: Describe the databases used and the search terms applied more specifically.\nQuality Assessment: Describe the metrics or tools used to evaluate the quality of the included studies.\n- Inclusion and exclusion criteria, search methodology and quality assessment sections added to paper\nResults:\nThe results are well-presented and supported by a solid evidence base. However, some sections could benefit from more synthesis to improve readability.\nNutrition: The information is detailed and pertinent, but a summary table could help visualize the effects of different dietary interventions better.\nAcupuncture: The acupuncture section is thorough but could benefit from a discussion on the limitations of the cited studies.\n- Limitations of paper reference 62 has been added\nConclusions:\nThe conclusions effectively summarize the key points of the article. However, reinforcing the message on the importance of integrating holistic strategies into clinical practice could enhance the impact.\n- Conclusion has been amended with statement on the importance of integration into clinical practice\nGraphs and Tables: Including more graphs and tables to visualize key data could improve the manuscript's comprehensibility and visual appeal..\n- Please refer to Table 1We thank you for the suggestions and have made the following adjustments to our paper:Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Close\nAbstract:\nThe abstract is well-structured and provides a clear overview of the topic. However, it could benefit from a concluding sentence that highlights the clinical significance of the findings to enhance reader understanding.\n- Abstract concluding sentence adjusted\nIntroduction:\nThe introduction is comprehensive and provides adequate context on endometriosis and the challenges associated with its treatment. However, it could benefit from emphasizing more recent research, particularly from the last two to three years.\nPlease discuss on the iatrogenic risk of endometriosis surgery and not only on the risk of recurrence (i.e. Ref [1,2])\n- Please refer to reference 6 and 7 cited in the amended submission\nMethods:\nThe methodology section is detailed and rigorous but could use some clarifications.\nInclusion and Exclusion Criteria: Provide more details on the criteria used to include or exclude specific studies.\nSearch Methodology: Describe the databases used and the search terms applied more specifically.\nQuality Assessment: Describe the metrics or tools used to evaluate the quality of the included studies.\n- Inclusion and exclusion criteria, search methodology and quality assessment sections added to paper\nResults:\nThe results are well-presented and supported by a solid evidence base. However, some sections could benefit from more synthesis to improve readability.\nNutrition: The information is detailed and pertinent, but a summary table could help visualize the effects of different dietary interventions better.\nAcupuncture: The acupuncture section is thorough but could benefit from a discussion on the limitations of the cited studies.\n- Limitations of paper reference 62 has been added\nConclusions:\nThe conclusions effectively summarize the key points of the article. However, reinforcing the message on the importance of integrating holistic strategies into clinical practice could enhance the impact.\n- Conclusion has been amended with statement on the importance of integration into clinical practice\nGraphs and Tables: Including more graphs and tables to visualize key data could improve the manuscript's comprehensibility and visual appeal..\n- Please refer to Table 1\nAlongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:\n- Approved\n- Approved with reservations\n- Not approved\n| Invited Reviewers | ||\n|---|---|---|\n| 1 | 2 | |\n| Version 2 (revision) 08 Nov 24 | read | read |\n| Version 1 23 Apr 24 | read | read |\nSign up for content alerts\nYou are now signed up to receive this alert\nAlongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:\nApproved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested\nApproved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.\nNot approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions\nProvide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:\nExamples of 'Non-Financial Competing Interests'\n- Within the past 4 years, you have held joint grants, published or collaborated with any of the authors of the selected paper.\n- You have a close personal relationship (e.g. parent, spouse, sibling, or domestic partner) with any of the authors.\n- You are a close professional associate of any of the authors (e.g. scientific mentor, recent student).\n- You work at the same institute as any of the authors.\n- You hope/expect to benefit (e.g. favour or employment) as a result of your submission.\n- You are an Editor for the journal in which the article is published.\nExamples of 'Financial Competing Interests'\n- You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, any of the following from any commercial organisation that may gain financially from your submission: a salary, fees, funding, reimbursements.\n- You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, shared grant support or other funding with any of the authors.\n- You hold, or are currently applying for, any patents or significant stocks/shares relating to the subject matter of the paper you are commenting on.\nSign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles\nAlready registered? Sign in\nclose\nError\nSign In\nIf you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.\nEmail us for further assistance.\nThe email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.\nEmail address not valid, please try again\nYou registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.\nTo sign in, please click here.\nIf you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.\nYou registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.\nTo sign in, please click here.\nIf you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.\nCode not correct, please try again\nServer error, please try again.\nIf your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.\nIf you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.\nPlease wait...","source_license":"CC0","license_restricted":false}