{"paper_id":"0a2447ed-cb93-40dc-9665-e38eb863ba23","body_text":"Assessment of participation disorders: A cross-sectional study with patients and health care providers | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Assessment of participation disorders: A cross-sectional study with patients and health care providers Eveline Prochaska, Stephanie Boden, Peter Bernstein This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-7157286/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Background: The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) offers a comprehensive framework for assessing health and participation, yet its clinical integration is hampered by complexity and limited digital infrastructure. Digital tools like the ICFx web application may bridge this gap by enabling structured, patient-centered documentation. This study investigates the feasibility and value of patient-led, digital ICF documentation in orthopedic rehabilitation, comparing patient and professional assessments and evaluating usability and acceptance. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted at a German rehabilitation clinic with adult inpatients suffering from chronic musculoskeletal conditions. Patients completed digital self-assessments using the ICFx app, including WHODAS 2.0, SF-36, and usability questionnaires. Healthcare professionals (physicians, physiotherapists, nurses, psychologists, care managers) independently coded ICF categories, first without and then with access to patient data. Agreement between patient and professional ICF selections, usability (System Usability Scale, SUS), and digital stress (Digital Stressors Scale, DSS) were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Results: Of 268 invited patients, 130 participated; 36 professionals contributed data. Patients selected more ICF categories (mean 27) than professionals (mean 13). Initial overlap between patient and professional ICF selections was 20–30%, rising to over 60% when professionals reviewed patient input. Professional-to-professional agreement was lower (10–20%). Professionals, especially physicians, tended to underestimate patient-reported impairments, but discrepancies diminished after reviewing patient data. Usability ratings were moderate (mean SUS 49), with physiotherapists and care managers rating the app as acceptable. Digital stress was generally low, though higher among professionals. Patient feedback highlighted usability challenges and limited perceived personal benefit. Conclusions: Digital, patient-led ICF documentation using the ICFx app is feasible and yields substantial agreement with professional assessments, particularly when patient input is integrated. Patients can independently report meaningful participation restrictions, supporting patient-centered care and interprofessional collaboration. While professional input adds value, patient self-assessment alone provides a robust foundation for functional health profiling. Usability improvements and broader validation in diverse settings are recommended to enhance adoption and impact. ICF participation disorders web application interprofessionality patient perspective digital health application cross-sectional study Full Text Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {\"props\":{\"pageProps\":{\"initialData\":{\"identity\":\"rs-7157286\",\"acceptedTermsAndConditions\":true,\"allowDirectSubmit\":true,\"archivedVersions\":[],\"articleType\":\"Research Article\",\"associatedPublications\":[],\"authors\":[{\"id\":521861457,\"identity\":\"7e2b1d7c-0bf7-4f8c-88ac-c429cc0caac8\",\"order_by\":0,\"name\":\"Eveline Prochaska\",\"email\":\"\",\"orcid\":\"\",\"institution\":\"TU Dresden\",\"correspondingAuthor\":true,\"prefix\":\"\",\"firstName\":\"Eveline\",\"middleName\":\"\",\"lastName\":\"Prochaska\",\"suffix\":\"\"},{\"id\":521861458,\"identity\":\"1edf7ca8-24b4-41bf-993c-7208e2278277\",\"order_by\":1,\"name\":\"Stephanie Boden\",\"email\":\"\",\"orcid\":\"\",\"institution\":\"Johannesbad Specialist Clinic \\u0026 Health Center Raupennest\",\"correspondingAuthor\":false,\"prefix\":\"\",\"firstName\":\"Stephanie\",\"middleName\":\"\",\"lastName\":\"Boden\",\"suffix\":\"\"},{\"id\":521861459,\"identity\":\"9a6d6e0d-56cb-4d18-9be7-11fe8cb0d6ab\",\"order_by\":2,\"name\":\"Peter Bernstein\",\"email\":\"\",\"orcid\":\"\",\"institution\":\"Johannesbad Specialist Clinic \\u0026 Health Center Raupennest\",\"correspondingAuthor\":false,\"prefix\":\"\",\"firstName\":\"Peter\",\"middleName\":\"\",\"lastName\":\"Bernstein\",\"suffix\":\"\"}],\"badges\":[],\"createdAt\":\"2025-07-18 11:38:19\",\"currentVersionCode\":1,\"declarations\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7157286/v1\",\"doiUrl\":\"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7157286/v1\",\"draftVersion\":[],\"editorialEvents\":[],\"editorialNote\":\"\",\"failedWorkflow\":false,\"files\":[{\"id\":92376771,\"identity\":\"90a61c42-912b-46d7-b0cb-ac49b8565120\",\"added_by\":\"auto\",\"created_at\":\"2025-09-29 05:11:47\",\"extension\":\"pdf\",\"order_by\":0,\"title\":\"\",\"display\":\"\",\"copyAsset\":false,\"role\":\"acdc-reference\",\"size\":484359,\"visible\":true,\"origin\":\"\",\"legend\":\"\",\"description\":\"\",\"filename\":\"Version24.pdf\",\"url\":\"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7157286/v1/c84cb08fe4c597efa061e9b1.pdf\"},{\"id\":92376772,\"identity\":\"8b6d3f98-0491-47d7-87cc-df7137585018\",\"added_by\":\"auto\",\"created_at\":\"2025-09-29 05:11:47\",\"extension\":\"json\",\"order_by\":1,\"title\":\"\",\"display\":\"\",\"copyAsset\":false,\"role\":\"acdc-reference\",\"size\":6656,\"visible\":true,\"origin\":\"\",\"legend\":\"\",\"description\":\"\",\"filename\":\"392f151fa675444abbc55b1e373cf5e8.json\",\"url\":\"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7157286/v1/b7dc6e299e4b7d5f71ddaa50.json\"},{\"id\":94195849,\"identity\":\"8164ca64-b7e0-43fa-b0e7-2817a60795e1\",\"added_by\":\"auto\",\"created_at\":\"2025-10-23 13:02:16\",\"extension\":\"pdf\",\"order_by\":1,\"title\":\"\",\"display\":\"\",\"copyAsset\":false,\"role\":\"manuscript-pdf\",\"size\":497342,\"visible\":true,\"origin\":\"\",\"legend\":\"\",\"description\":\"\",\"filename\":\"Version24.pdf\",\"url\":\"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7157286/v1_covered_06a29b6e-1108-443c-ac54-a7434c414986.pdf\"}],\"financialInterests\":\"No competing interests reported.\",\"formattedTitle\":\"Assessment of participation disorders: A cross-sectional study with patients and health care providers\",\"fulltext\":[],\"fulltextSource\":\"\",\"fullText\":\"\",\"funders\":[],\"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow\":false,\"hasManuscriptDocX\":false,\"hasOptedInToPreprint\":true,\"hasPassedJournalQc\":\"\",\"hasAnyPriority\":false,\"hideJournal\":true,\"highlight\":\"\",\"institution\":\"\",\"isAcceptedByJournal\":false,\"isAuthorSuppliedPdf\":true,\"isDeskRejected\":\"\",\"isHiddenFromSearch\":false,\"isInQc\":false,\"isInWorkflow\":false,\"isPdf\":true,\"isPdfUpToDate\":true,\"isWithdrawnOrRetracted\":false,\"journal\":{\"display\":true,\"email\":\"info@researchsquare.com\",\"identity\":\"researchsquare\",\"isNatureJournal\":false,\"hasQc\":true,\"allowDirectSubmit\":true,\"externalIdentity\":\"\",\"sideBox\":\"\",\"snPcode\":\"\",\"submissionUrl\":\"/submission\",\"title\":\"Research Square\",\"twitterHandle\":\"researchsquare\",\"acdcEnabled\":true,\"dfaEnabled\":false,\"editorialSystem\":\"\",\"reportingPortfolio\":\"\",\"inReviewEnabled\":false,\"inReviewRevisionsEnabled\":true},\"keywords\":\"ICF, participation disorders, web application, interprofessionality, patient perspective, digital health application, cross-sectional study\",\"lastPublishedDoi\":\"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7157286/v1\",\"lastPublishedDoiUrl\":\"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7157286/v1\",\"license\":{\"name\":\"CC BY 4.0\",\"url\":\"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/\"},\"manuscriptAbstract\":\"\\u003cp\\u003e\\u003cstrong\\u003eBackground:\\u003c/strong\\u003e The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) offers a comprehensive framework for assessing health and participation, yet its clinical integration is hampered by complexity and limited digital infrastructure. Digital tools like the ICFx web application may bridge this gap by enabling structured, patient-centered documentation. This study investigates the feasibility and value of patient-led, digital ICF documentation in orthopedic rehabilitation, comparing patient and professional assessments and evaluating usability and acceptance.\\u0026nbsp;\\u003c/p\\u003e\\n\\u003cp\\u003e\\u003cstrong\\u003eMethods:\\u003c/strong\\u003e A cross-sectional study was conducted at a German rehabilitation clinic with adult inpatients suffering from chronic musculoskeletal conditions. Patients completed digital self-assessments using the ICFx app, including WHODAS 2.0, SF-36, and usability questionnaires. Healthcare professionals (physicians, physiotherapists, nurses, psychologists, care managers) independently coded ICF categories, first without and then with access to patient data. Agreement between patient and professional ICF selections, usability (System Usability Scale, SUS), and digital stress (Digital Stressors Scale, DSS) were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics.\\u0026nbsp;\\u003c/p\\u003e\\n\\u003cp\\u003e\\u003cstrong\\u003eResults:\\u003c/strong\\u003e Of 268 invited patients, 130 participated; 36 professionals contributed data. Patients selected more ICF categories (mean 27) than professionals (mean 13). Initial overlap between patient and professional ICF selections was 20–30%, rising to over 60% when professionals reviewed patient input. Professional-to-professional agreement was lower (10–20%). Professionals, especially physicians, tended to underestimate patient-reported impairments, but discrepancies diminished after reviewing patient data. Usability ratings were moderate (mean SUS 49), with physiotherapists and care managers rating the app as acceptable. Digital stress was generally low, though higher among professionals. Patient feedback highlighted usability challenges and limited perceived personal benefit.\\u0026nbsp;\\u003c/p\\u003e\\n\\u003cp\\u003e\\u003cstrong\\u003eConclusions:\\u003c/strong\\u003e Digital, patient-led ICF documentation using the ICFx app is feasible and yields substantial agreement with professional assessments, particularly when patient input is integrated. Patients can independently report meaningful participation restrictions, supporting patient-centered care and interprofessional collaboration. While professional input adds value, patient self-assessment alone provides a robust foundation for functional health profiling. Usability improvements and broader validation in diverse settings are recommended to enhance adoption and impact.\\u003c/p\\u003e\",\"manuscriptTitle\":\"Assessment of participation disorders: A cross-sectional study with patients and health care providers\",\"msid\":\"\",\"msnumber\":\"\",\"nonDraftVersions\":[{\"code\":1,\"date\":\"2025-09-29 05:11:42\",\"doi\":\"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7157286/v1\",\"editorialEvents\":[{\"type\":\"communityComments\",\"content\":0}],\"status\":\"published\",\"journal\":{\"display\":true,\"email\":\"info@researchsquare.com\",\"identity\":\"researchsquare\",\"isNatureJournal\":false,\"hasQc\":true,\"allowDirectSubmit\":true,\"externalIdentity\":\"\",\"sideBox\":\"\",\"snPcode\":\"\",\"submissionUrl\":\"/submission\",\"title\":\"Research Square\",\"twitterHandle\":\"researchsquare\",\"acdcEnabled\":true,\"dfaEnabled\":false,\"editorialSystem\":\"\",\"reportingPortfolio\":\"\",\"inReviewEnabled\":false,\"inReviewRevisionsEnabled\":true}}],\"origin\":\"\",\"ownerIdentity\":\"336a8812-63c5-4c20-93f0-9ad528b8266e\",\"owner\":[],\"postedDate\":\"September 29th, 2025\",\"published\":true,\"recentEditorialEvents\":[],\"rejectedJournal\":[],\"revision\":\"\",\"amendment\":\"\",\"status\":\"posted\",\"subjectAreas\":[],\"tags\":[],\"updatedAt\":\"2025-10-23T12:54:07+00:00\",\"versionOfRecord\":[],\"versionCreatedAt\":\"2025-09-29 05:11:42\",\"video\":\"\",\"vorDoi\":\"\",\"vorDoiUrl\":\"\",\"workflowStages\":[]},\"version\":\"v1\",\"identity\":\"rs-7157286\",\"journalConfig\":\"researchsquare\"},\"__N_SSP\":true},\"page\":\"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]\",\"query\":{\"redirect\":\"/article/rs-7157286\",\"identity\":\"rs-7157286\",\"version\":[\"v1\"]},\"buildId\":\"XKTyCvWXoU3ODBz1xrDgd\",\"isFallback\":false,\"isExperimentalCompile\":false,\"dynamicIds\":[84888],\"gssp\":true,\"scriptLoader\":[]}","source_license":"CC-BY-4.0","license_restricted":false}