{"paper_id":"0676a84b-0720-4eee-891f-2ee1ce73681c","body_text":"Abstract\nArtificial intelligence (AI) may have the potential to improve existing diagnostic challenges in endometriosis imaging. To better direct future research, this descriptive review summarizes the general landscape of AI applications in endometriosis imaging. Articles from PubMed were selected to represent different approaches to AI applications in endometriosis imaging. Current endometriosis imaging literature focuses on AI applications in ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Most studies use US data, with MRI studies being limited at present. The majority of US studies employ transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) data and aim to detect deep endometriosis implants, adenomyosis, endometriomas, and secondary signs of endometriosis. Most MRI studies evaluate endometriosis disease diagnosis and segmentation. Some studies analyze multi-modal methods for endometriosis imaging, combining US and MRI data or using imaging data in combination with clinical data. Current literature lacks generalizability and standardization. Most studies in this review utilize small sample sizes with retrospective approaches and single-center data. Existing models only focus on narrow disease detection or diagnosis questions and lack standardized ground truth. Overall, AI applications in endometriosis imaging analysis are in their early stages, and continued research is essential to develop and enhance these models.\nSimilar content being viewed by others\nData availability\nNo datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.\nReferences\nBruyere C, Maniou I, Habre C, et al. Pelvic MRI for Endometriosis: A Diagnostic Challenge for the Inexperienced Radiologist. How Much Experience Is Enough? Academic Radiology. 2021;28(3):345–353. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2020.02.023\nHosny A, Parmar C, Quackenbush J, Schwartz LH, Aerts HJWL. Artificial intelligence in radiology. Nat Rev Cancer. 2018;18(8):500–510. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41568-018-0016-5\nMowers EL, Lim CS, Skinner B, et al. Prevalence of Endometriosis During Abdominal or Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Chronic Pelvic Pain. Obstet Gynecol 2016;127(6):1045–1053.\nNnoaham KE, Hummelshoj L, Webster P, et al. Impact of endometriosis on quality of life and work productivity: a multicenter study across ten countries. Fertil Steril. 2011;96(2):366–373.e8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.05.090.\nHadfield R, Mardon H, Barlow D, Kennedy S. Delay in the diagnosis of endometriosis: a survey of women from the USA and the UK. Hum Reprod. 1996;11(4):878–880. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019270\nGuerriero S, Pascual M, Ajossa S, et al. The Reproducibility of Ultrasonographic Findings of Rectosigmoid Endometriosis Among Examiners With Different Level of Expertise. J Ultrasound Med. 2022;41(2):403–408. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.15717\nLoftus TJ, Tighe PJ, Filiberto AC, et al. Artificial Intelligence and Surgical Decision-Making. JAMA Surg. 2020;155(2):148–158. doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2019.4917\nESHRE Guideline: Endometriosis. European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. 2022. Available at: https://www.eshre.eu/Guidelines-and-Legal/Guidelines/Endometriosis-guideline (Accessed on February 2, 2025.)\nYoung SW, Jha P, Chamié L, et al. Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus on Routine Pelvic US for Endometriosis. Radiology. 2024;311(1):e232191. doi:https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.232191\nFeldman MK, Wasnik AP, Adamson M, et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Endometriosis. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2024;21(11, Supplement):S384-S395. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2024.08.017\nVanBuren W, Feldman M, Shenoy-Bhangle AS, et al. Radiology State-of-the-art Review: Endometriosis Imaging Interpretation and Reporting. Radiology. 2024;312(3):e233482. doi:https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.233482\nUnlu E, Virarkar M, Rao S, Sun J, Bhosale P. Assessment of the Effectiveness of the Vaginal Contrast Media in Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Detection of Pelvic Pathologies: A Meta-analysis. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2020;44(3):436–442. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0000000000001012\nJha P, Sakala M, Chamie LP, et al. Endometriosis MRI lexicon: consensus statement from the society of abdominal radiology endometriosis disease-focused panel. Abdom Radiol. 2020;45(6):1552–1568. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-019-02291-x\nTang A, Tam R, Cadrin-Chênevert A, et al. Canadian Association of Radiologists White Paper on Artificial Intelligence in Radiology. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2018;69(2):120–135. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carj.2018.02.002\nvan Ginneken B, Schaefer-Prokop CM, Prokop M. Computer-aided diagnosis: how to move from the laboratory to the clinic. Radiology. 2011;261(3):719–732. doi:https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.11091710\nChoi RY, Coyner AS, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Chiang MF, Campbell JP. Introduction to Machine Learning, Neural Networks, and Deep Learning. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 9(2):14. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.9.2.14\nLi M, Jiang Y, Zhang Y, Zhu H. Medical image analysis using deep learning algorithms. Front Public Health. 2023;11:1273253. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1273253\nSun Y, Qu Y, Wang D, et al. Deep learning model improves radiologists’ performance in detection and classification of breast lesions. Chin J Cancer Res. 2021;33(6):682–693. doi:https://doi.org/10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2021.06.05\nDe Fauw J, Keane P, Tomasev N, et al. Automated analysis of retinal imaging using machine learning techniques for computer vision. F1000Res. 2016;5:1573. doi:https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.8996.2\nGhafoorian M, Karssemeijer N, Heskes T, et al. Location Sensitive Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Segmentation of White Matter Hyperintensities. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):5110. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05300-5\nBalica A, Dai J, Piiwaa K, et al. Augmenting endometriosis analysis from ultrasound data using deep learning. In: Medical Imaging 2023: Ultrasonic Imaging and Tomography. Vol 12470. SPIE; 2023:118–123. doi:https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2653940\nGuerriero S, Pascual M, Ajossa S, et al. Artificial intelligence (AI) in the detection of rectosigmoid deep endometriosis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021;261:29–33. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.04.012\nMaicas G, Leonardi M, Avery J, et al. Deep learning to diagnose pouch of Douglas obliteration with ultrasound sliding sign. Reproduction and Fertility. 2021;2(4):236–243. doi:https://doi.org/10.1530/RAF-21-0031\nReid S, Lu C, Condous G. Can we improve the prediction of pouch of Douglas obliteration in women with suspected endometriosis using ultrasound-based models? A multicenter prospective observational study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015;94(12):1297–1306. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.12779\nRaimondo D, Raffone A, Aru AC, et al. Application of Deep Learning Model in the Sonographic Diagnosis of Uterine Adenomyosis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(3):1724. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20031724\nHu P, Gao Y, Zhang Y, Sun K. Ultrasound image-based deep learning to differentiate tubal-ovarian abscess from ovarian endometriosis cyst. Front Physiol. 2023;14:1101810. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2023.1101810\nMiao K, Lv Q, Zhang L, Zhao N, Dong X. Discriminative diagnosis of ovarian endometriosis cysts and benign mucinous cystadenomas based on the ConvNeXt algorithm. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2024;298:135–139. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.05.010\nLiu L, Cai W, Zhou C, et al. Ultrasound radiomics-based artificial intelligence model to assist in the differential diagnosis of ovarian endometrioma and ovarian dermoid cyst. Front Med. 2024;11. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1362588\nȘtefan RA, Ștefan PA, Mihu CM, et al. Ultrasonography in the Differentiation of Endometriomas from Hemorrhagic Ovarian Cysts: The Role of Texture Analysis. Journal of Personalized Medicine. 2021;11(7):611. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm11070611\nWu M, Cui G, Lv S, et al. Deep convolutional neural networks for multiple histologic types of ovarian tumors classification in ultrasound images. Front Oncol. 2023;13. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1154200\nButler D, Wang H, Zhang Y, et al. The Effectiveness of Self-supervised Pre-training for Multi-modal Endometriosis Classification*†. In: 2023 45th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC).; 2023:1–5. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC40787.2023.10340504\nLupean RA, Ștefan PA, Csutak C, et al. Differentiation of Endometriomas from Ovarian Hemorrhagic Cysts at Magnetic Resonance: The Role of Texture Analysis. Medicina (Kaunas). 2020;56(10):487. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina56100487\nYang M, Liu M, Chen Y, He S, Lin Y. Diagnostic efficacy of ultrasound combined with magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of deep pelvic endometriosis under deep learning. J Supercomput. 2021;77(7):7598–7619. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-020-03535-0\nNouri B, Hashemi SH, J Ghadimi D, Roshandel S, Akhlaghdoust M. Machine Learning-Based Detection of Endometriosis: A Retrospective Study in A Population of Iranian Female Patients. Int J Fertil Steril. 2024;18(4):362–366. doi:https://doi.org/10.22074/ijfs.2024.2009338.1519\nWang H, Butler D, Zhang Y, et al. Human-AI collaborative multi-modal multi-rater learning for endometriosis diagnosis. Phys Med Biol. 2024;70(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ad997e\nZhang Y, Wang H, Butler D, et al. Distilling Missing Modality Knowledge from Ultrasound for Endometriosis Diagnosis with Magnetic Resonance Images. In: 2023 IEEE 20th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI). IEEE; 2023:1–5. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/ISBI53787.2023.10230667\nImagendo®– Non Invasive Diagnosis of endometriosis using Artificial Intelligence. Accessed January 1, 2025. https://imagendo.org.au/\nWiggins WF, Kitamura F, Santos I, Prevedello LM. Natural Language Processing of Radiology Text Reports: Interactive Text Classification. Radiology: Artificial Intelligence. 2021;3(4):e210035. doi:https://doi.org/10.1148/ryai.2021210035\nAuthor information\nAuthors and Affiliations\nContributions\nAll authors contributed to the review article’s conception and design. Literature search was performed by SM, and analysis was performed by all authors. The first draft of the manuscript was written by SM, and all authors critically revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.\nCorresponding author\nEthics declarations\nCompeting interests\nAngela Tong has received an honorarium from Siemens Healthineers as a speaker and research support from Siemens Healthineers in the form of hardware and software. The other authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.\nAdditional information\nPublisher’s note\nSpringer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.\nElectronic supplementary material\nBelow is the link to the electronic supplementary material.\nRights and permissions\nSpringer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.\nAbout this article\nCite this article\nMittal, S., Tong, A., Young, S. et al. Artificial intelligence applications in endometriosis imaging. Abdom Radiol 50, 4901–4913 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-025-04897-w\nReceived:\nRevised:\nAccepted:\nPublished:\nVersion of record:\nIssue date:\nDOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-025-04897-w","source_license":"public-domain-us","license_restricted":false}